Disparities in Survival of Head and Neck Cancer in the Hispanic Population: Systematic-Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The Hispanic health paradox (HHP), the observation that Hispanic people in the United States often experience better health outcomes than non-Hispanic people despite having worse prognostic factors, has not been evaluated for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a malignancy with marked racial disparities in outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the HHP within the context of HNSCC.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies that compared survival between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with HNSCC in the United States were included. Meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was conducted to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between Hispanic white (HW) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients with HNSCC.

RESULTS

Of 2106 unique abstracts reviewed, 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Among the 657,185 patients in the meta-analysis, 6.9% (95% CI: 5.8%-8.3%) were of Hispanic ethnicity. HW patients had improved OS relative to NHW patients (aHR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.94) among the 17 studies reporting OS and improved CSS relative to NHW patients (aHR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94) among the 4 studies reporting this outcome.

CONCLUSION

HW people with HNSCC exhibit improved survival relative to NHW people with HNSCC, supporting the HHP in the context of HNSCC. Research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms, which could provide insights into improving outcomes for all patients with HNSCC.

Treatment and related morbidity of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers

Introduction

Sinonasal malignancies are rare and histologically heterogeneous cancers of the nasal cavity and sinuses. The treatment of choice is usually surgery and, if necessary, adjuvant radiotherapy. In this study, we aimed to investigate treatment modalities and associated morbidity.

Methods

A consecutive case series of solid sinonasal cancer treated at our tertiary referral center was analyzed. We performed a retrospective chart review and statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 156 patients with sinonasal cancer were enrolled in the present study. Male patients were more frequently affected (62%) and the median age was 64 years. Squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma (MM) were the most common histopathological entities. Surgery was the primary treatment modality for 73% of curatively treated patients. Primary radiotherapy alone or in combination with systemic treatment was less frequent. Median overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 164 months and 71.3 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed negative associations of histology (MM) and skull base involvement on RFS and age, skull base involvement and the type of primary therapy (radiochemotherapy) on OS. Postoperative 30-day morbidity was low, with most patients (84%) experiencing no reported events. Radiotherapy was generally well-tolerated, despite most of patients experienced acute toxicity such as dermatitis (80.6%) or mucositis (72.1%). However, only one event of acute toxicity > grade 3 was reported. Long term morbidity was most frequently reported as pain (23%), dry mucosa (19%) and anosmia (14%).

Conclusion

We observed negative associations of histology (MM) and skull base involvement on RFS and age, skull base involvement and the type of primary therapy (radiochemotherapy) on OS. Acute treatment-related morbidity was generally low for surgical patients and considerable for irradiated patients. Moreover, a consistent part of the cohort displayed long term morbidity.

Assessing the Association Between Time to Surgery and Survival in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

To assess the association between time to surgery (TTS) and survival in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma patients (SSCC).

METHODS

We queried the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database for all cases of adult SSCC undergoing primary surgical treatment. Patients with missing TTS information were excluded. We conducted a multivariate analysis of patient demographic and clinicopathological characteristics' effect on overall survival (OS) using a Cox proportional hazards model enhanced with cubic spline non-linear approximation. Bootstrapping methods were utilized to detect the aggregate risk of TTS delay on patient OS.

RESULTS

A total of 2,881 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were male (63.5%), White (86.3%), and over the age of 60 (58.4%). Parametric cubic spline approximation Cox hazard model detected a non-linear association between patient OS and TTS below 30 days with the lowest risk occurring at 18 days and steadily increasing subsequently. To analyze the aggregate risk and identify the optimal TTS cut-off after 30 days of surgical delay, the cohort sample was bootstrapped and dichotomized. The largest increase in aggregated risk was identified at 59 days (Hazards Ratio [HR] = 1.006 [0.839-1.084], p = 0.003). 60 days were used as the optimal TTS cut-off for analyzing the survival rate using the Cox proportional hazard model. Undergoing surgery within 60 days translated to a 14.6% decreased chance of death (HR: 0.854 [0.83-0.96]).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing TTS is associated with worse overall survival in patients with SSCC. Our study suggests that surgery should be done within 60 days to achieve optimal survival results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:3389-3395, 2023.

Hypothyroidism as an Independent Predictor of 30-day Readmission in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

To define the role of hypothyroidism and other risk factors for unplanned readmissions after surgery for head and neck cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to identify patients who underwent surgery for mucosal head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx) between 2010 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine patient, tumor, and hospital related risk factors for 30-day readmission. Readmitted patients were stratified by preoperative diagnosis of hypothyroidism to compare readmission characteristics.

RESULTS

For the 131,013 patients who met inclusion criteria, the readmission rate was 15.9%. Overall, 11.91% of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of hypothyroidism. After controlling for other variables, patients with a preoperative diagnosis of hypothyroidism had 12.2% higher odds of readmission compared to those without hypothyroidism (OR: 1.12, 1.03-1.22, p = 0.008). Patients with hypothyroidism had different reasons for readmission, including higher rates of wound dehiscence, fistula, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Among readmitted patients, the length of stay for index admission (mean 10.5 days vs. 9.2 days, p < 0.001), readmission (mean 7.0 vs. 6.6 days, p = 0.05), and total hospital charge were higher for hypothyroid patients ($137,742 vs. $119,831, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hypothyroidism is an independent risk factor for 30-day readmission following head and neck cancer resection. Furthermore, hypothyroid patients are more likely to be readmitted for wound complications, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Targeted interventions should be considered for hypothyroid patients to decrease readmission rates and associated patient morbidity, potentially leading to earlier initiation of adjuvant treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2988-2998, 2023.

Unmet Needs and Receipt of Supportive Care Services in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Prior to Oncologic Treatment: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the supportive care (SC) needs and receipt of SC services among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients prior to oncologic treatment and to explore the influence of social determinants of health on these outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed HNC patients were surveyed via telephone prior to oncologic treatment between 10/2019 and 1/2021 using a prospective, cross-sectional, bi-institutional, pilot study design. The primary study outcome was unmet SC needs (Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form34 [SCNS-SF34]). Hospital type (university- vs county safety-net) was explored as an exposure. Descriptive statistics were performed using STATA16 (College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Among 158 potentially eligible patients, 129 were successfully contacted, 78 met the study criteria, and 50 completed the survey. The mean age was 61, 58% exhibited clinical stage III-IV disease, and 68% and 32% were treated at the university and county safety-net hospital, respectively. Patients were surveyed a median of 20 days after their first oncology visit and 17 days prior to initiation of oncology treatment. They had a median of 24 total needs (11 were met and 13 were unmet) and preferred to see a median of 4 SC services but received care from none. County safety-net patients had comparatively more unmet needs than university patients (14.5 vs 11.5, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment HNC patients at a bi-institutional academic medical center report a high number of unmet SC needs with corollary poor receipt of available SC services. Novel interventions to address this significant gap in care are needed.

Postoperative Radiation Therapy Refusal in Major Salivary Gland Cancers

OBJECTIVE

Major salivary gland cancers (MSGCs) are often treated with primary surgery followed by adjuvant therapy for high-risk pathology. Patients with these cancers may opt out of recommended postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for many reasons and consequently may suffer worse outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with MSGC from 2004 to 2016 were identified, and overall survival and risk factors for refusal of recommended PORT were analyzed based on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. Multivariable logistic regression and a Cox model were used to conduct the analysis.

RESULTS

211 out of 4704 qualifying patients (4.5%) refused recommended PORT. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased PORT refusal for age >74 years (odds ratio OR 4.34, confidence interval [CI] [2.43-7.85]), Asian race (OR 2.25, CI [1.10-4.23]), and certain facility types (comprehensive cancer center, OR 2.39, CI [1.08-6.34]; academic research program, OR 3.29, CI [1.49-8.74]; and integrated network cancer program, OR 2.75, CI [1.14-7.7]). N2 stage was associated with decreased PORT refusal (OR 0.67, CI [0.45-0.98]). The 5-year overall survival for patients who received and refused PORT were significantly different at 65.8% and 53.8%, respectively (p < .001). When controlling for several factors, PORT refusal was independently associated with significantly lower overall survival (HR 1.54, CI [1.21-1.98]).

CONCLUSION

Patient refusal of recommended PORT in MSGC is rare, associated with various disease and socioeconomic factors, and may decrease overall survival. Our findings can assist clinicians in counseling patients and identifying those who may be more likely to opt out of recommended PORT.

The Impact of Delay in Treatment on Survival in Surgically Managed Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma

Background  Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, and multimodal therapy is the standard of care. We sought to characterize treatment delays in SNUC managed with surgery and adjuvant radiation and to determine the impact on survival using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods  This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients with SNUC between 2004 and 2016 in the NCDB. The intervals of diagnosis to surgery (DTS), surgery to radiation (SRT), and radiation duration (RTD) were examined. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to identify the variables with the greatest impact on survival. The association between treatment delay and overall survival (OS) was then assessed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Results  Of 173 patients who met inclusion criteria, 65.9% were male, average age at diagnosis was 56.6 years, and 5-year OS was 48.1%. Median durations of DTS, SRT, and RTD were 18, 43, and 46 days, respectively. Predictors of treatment delay included Black race, government insurance excluding Medicare/Medicaid, and positive margins. RPA-derived optimal thresholds were 29, 28, and 38 days for DTS, SRT and RTD, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28-10.2) and DTS less than 29 days (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.23-4.73) were associated with worse OS. Conclusion  Our results likely reflect the aggressive nature of the disease with surgeons taking more invasive disease to the operating room more quickly. Median treatment intervals described may serve as relevant national benchmarks.

Association of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With Esthesioneuroblastoma Presentation, Treatment, and Survival

Objective

Socioeconomic and other demographic factors are associated with outcomes in head and neck cancer. This study uses a national cancer database to explore how patient race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with esthesioneuroblastoma outcomes, including 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS), conditional DSS, stage at diagnosis, and treatment.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting

Patients with esthesioneuroblastomas between 1973 and 2015 from the SEER registry (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results).

Methods

The National Cancer Institute Yost Index, a census tract–level composite score composed of 7 parameters, was used to categorize the SES of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were conducted to assess DSS. Conditional DSS was calculated per estimates from simplified Cox models. Logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors for advanced cancer stage at diagnosis and the likelihood of receiving multimodal therapy.

Results

Complete data were included for 561 patients. DSS was significantly associated with SES (log-rank, P < .01) but not race. According to Cox regression, DSS was worse for the lowest SES tertile vs the highest (hazard ratio, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.05-2.75]; P = .03). Patients of the lowest SES tertile exhibited an increased risk of advanced cancer stage at diagnosis as compared with the highest SES tertile (odds ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.06-3.30]; P = .035). Black patients (odds ratio, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24-0.84]; P = .011) were less likely than other patients to receive multimodal therapy. SES alone was not associated with receiving multimodal therapy.

Conclusion

SES is significantly associated with DSS and conditional DSS for patients with esthesioneuroblastomas. Inequalities in access to care and treatment likely contribute to these disparities.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Paranasal Sinus Cancer Disease-Specific and Conditional Survival

OBJECTIVE

Socioeconomic status (SES) is often used to quantify social determinants of health. This study uses the National Cancer Institute SES index to examine the effect of SES on disease-specific survival and 5-year conditional disease-specific survival (CDSS; the change in life expectancy with increasing survivorship) in paranasal sinus cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program.

METHODS

A study of adults with sinus cancer between 1973 and 2015 was performed. The Yost index, a census tract-level composite score of SES, was used to categorize patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression for disease-specific survival were stratified by SES. CDSS was calculated with simplified models. Logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors for advanced stage at diagnosis, multimodal therapy, and diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

There were 3437 patients analyzed. In Cox models adjusting for patient-specific factors, the lowest SES tertile exhibited worse mortality (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.39; P < .01). After addition of treatment and pathology, SES was not significant (P = .07). The lowest SES tertile was more often diagnosed at later stages (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.06; P < .01). For those with regional/distant disease, the middle tertile (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90; P < .01) and lowest tertile (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91; P < .01) were less likely to receive multimodal therapy. SES tertiles primarily affected 5-year CDSS for regional/distant disease. CDSS for all stages converged over time.

CONCLUSION

Lower SES is associated with worse outcomes in paranasal sinus cancer. Research should be devoted toward understanding factors that contribute to such disparities, including tumor pathology and treatment course.

Postoperative Radiation Therapy Refusal in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct clinical entity with good prognosis, unique demographics, and a trend toward treatment deintensification. Patients with this disease may opt out of recommended postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for a variety of reasons. The aim of this paper was to examine factors that predict patient refusal of recommended PORT in HPV-associated OPSCC, and the association of refusal with overall survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with OPSCC between January 2010 and December 2015. We primarily assessed overall survival and the odds of refusing PORT based on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. Analysis was conducted using multivariable logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 4229 patients were included in the final analysis, with 156 (3.7%) patients opting out of recommended PORT. On multivariable analysis, patient refusal of PORT was independently associated with a variety of socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance status, comorbidity, treatment at a single facility, and margin status. Lastly, PORT refusal was associated with significantly lower overall survival compared to receipt of recommended PORT (hazard ratio 1.69, confidence interval 1.02-2.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient refusal of recommended PORT in HPV-associated OPSCC is rare and associated with variety of disease and socioeconomic factors. PORT refusal may decrease overall survival in this population. Our findings may help clinicians when counseling patients and identifying those who may be more likely to opt out of recommended adjuvant therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Prognosis of Distant Metastatic Sites in Anterior Skull Base Malignancies

Objective This study aimed to provide information regarding the prognosis of patients presenting with metastatic anterior skull base malignancies based upon histology and site of distant metastasis (DM).

Patients and Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with anterior skull base malignant neoplasms with DM.

Outcomes Prognosis was compared between site of DM and tumor histologies. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

Results A total of 481 patients were identified. Lung was the most common site of DM (24.9%), followed by bone (22.2%), liver (5.6%), and brain (2.5%). Lung was the most common site for squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) (28.3%), melanoma (37.7%), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC; 31.4%). The median survival for patients presenting with metastatic disease regardless of tumor histology was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.2–10.3), and patients with metastasis to the liver had the best median survival at 15.5 months (95% CI: 10.5–25.6). The median survivals for the most common histologies, SCCa, melanoma, and ACC were 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.5–10.2), 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.7–14.1), and 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.1–61.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated worse overall survival (OS) for older patients, higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores, and tumors with higher grade and T stage. Compared with metastasis to bone, lung metastasis had better OS on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51–97). Adenoid cystic carcinoma had improved OS compared with SCCa (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39–99).

Conclusion Tumor histology, metastatic sites, and several disease factors affected prognosis in anterior skull base malignancies with DM.

Palliative care in metastatic head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Due to inherent impact on quality of life, metastatic head and neck cancer patients are well-suited to benefit from palliative care (PC). Our objective was to examine factors that shape PC utilization and implications for overall survival in stage IVc head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with stage IVc head and neck cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2004 and 2015 was conducted.

RESULTS

7794 cases met inclusion criteria, of which 19.3% received PC. PC use was associated with more recent years of diagnosis, Northeast facility geography, and non-private insurances (p < 0.05). Compared to no PC, "interventional" PC, defined as palliative surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy, and "pain management only" PC were associated with lower overall survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PC use increased over time and was associated with demographic and clinical factors. There remains opportunity for improvement in optimal implementation of palliative care.

Socioeconomic Factors Affect Presentation Stage and Survival in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Socioeconomic factors affect oncologic outcome in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). However, the relationship between these factors and stage at presentation (SAP)-a critical, early point in the care cycle-is not known. This study sought to determine the role of race/ethnicity, treatment facility type, insurance status/carrier, and other socioeconomic factors in SAP and survival among patients with advanced SNSCC.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, 6,155 patients with SNSCC were identified and divided into those with "early" (Stage I or II; 2,212 (35.9%)) versus "advanced" (Stage III or IV; 3,943 (64.1%)) disease. Associations between sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors on SAP and survival were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Black (odds ratio [OR]: 2.18, CI: 1.74-2.76), Asian and Pacific Islander (API) (OR: 2.37, CI: 1.43-4.14), and Medicaid or uninsured (OR: 2.04, CI: 1.66-2.53) patients were more likely to present with advanced disease. Among patients with advanced disease, API patients demonstrated the highest 10-year survival rate (30.2%), and Black patients had the lowest 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates (47.7%, 31.9% and 19.2%, respectively). Older age (HR:1.03, CI:1.03-1.04), Black race (HR:1.39, CI:1.21-1.59), Medicaid or uninsured status (HR:1.48, CI:1.27-1.71), and treatment at a community hospital (HR:1.25, CI:1.14-1.37) were associated with poorer overall survival among patients with advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors including race/ethnicity, treatment facility type, insurance status/carrier, and other socioeconomic factors influence SAP and survival in SNSCC. An improved understanding of how these factors relate to outcomes may elucidate opportunities to address gaps in education and access to care in vulnerable populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Role of elective neck dissection and adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with polymorphous adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of elective neck dissection (END) and of adjuvant radiation (aRT) in polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC), previously known as polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database with a histology of PAC (coded as PLGA) at a head and neck site diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess overall survival in the overall population, and in sub-analyses of clinically N0 disease, positive resection margins, and late stage disease.

RESULTS

A total of 922 patients [66.8% female; mean (SD) age, 60.9 (13.9) years] met inclusion criteria. 74.7% of patients received surgery alone, and 18.0% received surgery and aRT. Only 7.6% of patients with clinically N0 disease received an END, with 10.6% of these having at least one positive node. END did not have a survival benefit compared to no END [HR 1.28 (0.61-2.68)]. Compared to surgery alone, aRT did not have significantly increased survival in the overall population or in late stage [HR 0.68 (0.39-1.19) and HR 0.46 (0.18-1.22), respectively]. On sub-analysis of patients with positive resection margins, aRT had a significant survival benefit compared to surgery alone [HR 0.37 (0.14-0.99)].

CONCLUSION

PAC is a rare, slow-growing malignant tumor typically treated with surgical excision, with undefined indications for END or aRT. Our findings show END to not have a benefit to overall survival. In patients with positive resection margins, there was a survival benefit for aRT.

Predictors of surgical readmission, unplanned hospitalization and emergency department use in head and neck oncology: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of unplanned hospitalization and emergency department (ED) use among head and neck oncology patients.

METHODS

Peer reviewed publications were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies describing a cohort of HNC patients that detailed predictors of unplanned hospitalization or ED use in risk-adjusted models were eligible for inclusion. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality In Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and an adapted version of the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

Of the 932 articles identified, 39 studies met our inclusion criteria with 31/39 describing predictors of surgical readmission and 10/39 describing predictors of ED use or unplanned hospitalization during radiation/chemoradiation treatment. Risk factors were classified into either 'patient-related', 'cancer severity' or 'process' factors. In the subset of studies looking at readmission following surgery wound complications (10/14 studies), presence of comorbidity (16/28 studies), low socioeconomic status (8/17 studies), cancer stage (9/14 studies), and prolonged hospital stay (7/18 studies) were the variables most frequently associated with readmission on multivariable analysis. Presence of comorbidity (6/10) and chemotherapy use (4/10) were more frequently associated with ED use and unplanned hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Several consistent predictors have been identified across a variety of studies. This work is a critical first step towards the development of readmission and ED prediction models. It also enables meaningful comparison of hospital readmission rates with risk adjustment in HNC patients.

Prognostic Factors of Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinomas Arising De Novo and From Inverted Papilloma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic factors and survival difference between inverted papilloma (IP)-associated sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and de novo SCC are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical features and oncologic outcomes in patients with IP-associated SCC and de novo SCC; and additionally, to analyze the prognostic factors of the two types of SCCs.

METHODS

Data from 173 SCC patients treated for IP-associated SCC (n = 89) and de novo SCC (n = 84), were reviewed retrospectively for demographic features, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, and clinical outcomes. 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze factors influencing prognosis.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of IP-associated SCC occurred in frontal and sphenoid sinus compared to de novo SCC. The two groups demonstrated similar 5-year OS and DFS (5-year OS: 63.3% and 55.4%, DFS: 45.4% and 50.1%, respectively). The metachronous tumor had a relatively better prognosis outcome than synchronous tumor and de novo SCC (5-year OS: 73.1%, 54.5% and 55.4%, respectively). Both groups showed similar loco-regional recurrence rates (p > 0.05); however, de novo SCC tumors demonstrated an increased incidence of distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis indicated that age >70 years, advanced tumor stage and surgical margin were independent predictive factors for the risk of mortality (HR 2.047, 1.581 and 1.931, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IP-associated SCCs have an aggressive loco-regional tendency, whereas de novo SCCs have a higher aggressive distant metastatic propensity. Age, tumor stage and surgical positive margin are key factors for poor prognosis and should be routinely taken into consideration during treatment planning and subsequent surveillance.

Sinonasal carcinomas - A single-centre experience at Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia, from 1994 to 2016

INTRODUCTION

Sinonasal carcinomas (SNCs) are rare neoplasms that are often diagnosed at advanced stages due to asymptomatic growth of tumours in the spaces of the sinonasal complex. Treatment is associated with high morbidity, and outcomes have only improved slightly in the past few decades despite advancements in treatment modalities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment at our institution.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analysed patients who received definitive treatment at the Prince of Wales Hospital (POWH), Sydney, for non-metastatic SNC. Patients with non-carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma pathology were excluded. Data were collected from the POWH electronic patient database. Survival functions were calculated through Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate analysis for prognostic factors was performed through Cox regression.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients from 1994 to 2016 were eligible for analysis. Overall 5-year local control (LC), ultimate local control (ULC), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 76 ± 6%, 80 ± 5%, 69 ± 6% and 77 ± 5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, clinical stage was prognostic for LC and primary site was prognostic for OS and CSS. Lymphovascular invasion and tumour inoperability were also predictive of CSS.

CONCLUSION

Survival and local control rates at our centre were greater than those reported in the literature. Early-stage patients treated with surgery alone had excellent oncologic outcomes. Radical surgery with postoperative radiation provides the best outcome in the setting of advanced disease.

Predictors of nodal metastasis in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: A national cancer database analysis

Objective

We present the largest population based study of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to identify risk factors for presentation with nodal metastasis.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used for this study. Location codes corresponding to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and histology codes representing SCC malignancy were queried. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with presentation with nodal metastasis.

Results

6448 cases met inclusion criteria. Nodal metastasis at presentation was seen in 13.2% of patients, with the sinus subsite (19.3%) being a significant risk factor for nodal metastasis at presentation when compared to the nasal cavity (7.9%). Logistic regression analysis showed black, uninsured and Medicaid patients were more likely than white and privately insured patients, respectively, to present with nodal metastasis.

Conclusions

In sinonasal SCC, the sinus subsite has a significantly increased risk of nodal metastasis compared to the nasal cavity. Black race, uninsured and Medicaid patients are more likely to have nodal metastasis at presentation.

Association of Type of Treatment Facility With Overall Survival After a Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Patients with head and neck cancer receive care at academic comprehensive cancer programs (ACCPs), integrated network cancer programs (INCPs), comprehensive community cancer programs (CCCPs), and community cancer programs (CCPs). The type of treatment facility may be associated with overall survival.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether type of treatment facility is associated with overall survival after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based retrospective cohort study included patients from the National Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained, hospital-based cancer registry of patients treated at more than 1500 US hospitals. Participants were diagnosed with malignant tumors of the head and neck from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from May 1 through November 30, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Treatment at facilities classified as ACCPs, INCPs, CCCPs, or CCPs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival after diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the odds of receiving treatment at ACCPs and INCPs vs CCCPs and CCPs. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 525 740 patients (368 821 men [70.2%]; mean [SD] age, 63.3 [14.0] years) were diagnosed with malignant tumors of the head and neck during the study period. Among them, 36 595 patients (7.0%) were treated at CCPs; 174 658 (33.2%), at CCCPs; 232 867 (44.3%), at ACCPs; and 57 857 (11.0%), at INCPs. The median survival for patients with aerodigestive cancers was 69.2 (95% CI, 68.6-69.8) months; salivary gland cancers, 107.2 (95% CI, 103.9-110.2) months; and skin cancers, 113.2 (95% CI, 111.4-114.6) months. Improved overall survival was associated with treatment at ACCPs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.91), INCPs (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96), and CCCPs (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95) compared with CCPs. Compared with patients with private insurance, those with government insurance (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.29-1.41), no insurance (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), or Medicaid (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.14-1.20) were more likely to receive treatment at ACCPs and INCPs, whereas patients with Medicare were less likely to receive treatment at ACCPs and INCPs (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Compared with white patients, black (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.52-1.59) and Asian (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.49-1.63) patients were more likely to receive care at ACCPs and INCPs. Compared with patients from lower-income areas, patients from high-income areas were more likely to receive treatment at ACCPs and INCPs (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.22-1.28).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that treatment at ACCPs and INCPs was associated with a better overall survival rate in patients with head and neck cancer. Key social determinants of health such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and type of insurance were associated with receiving treatment at ACCPs and INCPs.