Dupilumab Adverse Events in Nasal Polyp Treatment: Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence

Dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab have demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in phase 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). With recent regulatory approvals, there has been a surge in real-world studies (RWSs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the efficacy and safety of these four biologics in real-world settings. Primary outcomes were nasal polyp score and sino-nasal outcome test-22 score. Secondary outcomes included smell identification test score, loss of smell score, nasal congestion score, overall nasal symptom score, treatment response, and adverse events (AEs) prompting discontinuation. Efficacy outcomes at 4, 6, 12, and over 12 months were summarised, and meta-analyses of mean changes from baseline were conducted. Sixty-four RWSs involving 3921 patients were included. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed at most follow-up time points, with dupilumab showing particularly notable effects. The efficacy observed in these RWSs was superior to that demonstrated in phase 3 RCTs. All biologics exhibited low discontinuation rates due to AEs. Overall, biologic treatments for CRSwNP in real-world settings demonstrate strong efficacy and good safety. However, the limitations in current RWSs highlight the need for long-term, high-quality multicentre prospective studies and comprehensive healthcare database analyses.

Chinese Position Paper on Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Emerging biologics that selectively target key cytokines present a promising therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from severe, uncontrollable chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Despite the limited availability of registered biologics for CRSwNP treatment in China, the country is experiencing rapid development in this field. It is imperative to standardize the application of biologic agents in CRSwNP management in preparation for their future integration into the CRSwNP care pathway. The Rhinology Group, Chinese Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; the Rhinology Group, Chinese Medical Doctor Association of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; and the Nasal and Ocular Allergy Group, Chinese Society of Allergy have convened an expert panel consisting of principal investigators experienced in clinical trials of biologic treatment for CRSwNP. This expert panel was assembled to discuss the application of biologic agents in patients with CRSwNP in China. Additionally, the latest findings on the pathogenesis of CRSwNP, mechanisms of biologic agents, and efficacy and safety of biologic treatment in patients with CRSwNP were reviewed, with a special emphasis on research evidence from China. The expert panel reached a consensus on several critical issues, including criteria for the prescription, treatment course, and efficacy evaluation from a Chinese perspective. This position paper aims to guide Chinese physicians in the use of biologic agents for patients with CRSwNP. As our experience with biologic treatment continues to grow, this position paper will be further updated.

Practice Patterns of Biologics Prescriptions and Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remains challenging to manage effectively, with high symptom recurrence rates and significant impacts on quality of life, prompting a need to evaluate the real-world use of biologics and optimize treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the real-world application and perspectives of American Rhinologic Society (ARS) members on biologic treatments and surgical interventions for CRSwNP, focusing on clinical practice patterns, adoption of biologics, and their impact on surgical practices.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire evaluated clinical practice patterns of biologics prescriptions and surgery in treating CRSwNP between July 2022 and August 2023. Data collected from 162 ARS members were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 162 participants, a substantial majority (95.06%, n = 154) reported prescribing biologics in their practice. Notably, 45.45% (n = 70) found biologics easily accessible, although accessibility challenges remained for some. The impact of biologics on surgical practices was significant, with 36.36% (n = 56) observing a marked reduction in revision sinus surgeries. Among the participants, 47.16% (n = 71) agreed that aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) was the highest phenotype that tended to increase the possibility of biological treatment by more than 20%. Adopting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) was prevalent, with 57.79% (n = 89) utilizing them in patient management.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the evolving landscape in managing CRSwNP, with a marked trend toward integrating biological treatments into clinical practice. It underscores the necessity for continued research, updates to clinical guidelines, and enhanced practitioner education to optimize treatment outcomes for CRSwNP patients.

A rare case of disseminated amebiasis in a patient on biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis

KEY POINTS

Dupilumab targets Th2-associated inflammatory mediators to reduce disease burden in CRSwNP. While rare, potential sequelae include viral, helminth, and potentially amebic infections.

Adverse events of mepolizumab in the treatment of nasal polyps: A FDA database evaluation

BACKGROUND

Mepolizumab has shown significant efficacy in managing eosinophil-associated disorders such as eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Despite the advancements in treatment options for CRSwNP, traditional therapies often fail to prevent polyp recurrence and come with substantial side effects, emphasizing the need for ongoing evaluation of new therapeutic approaches and their safety profiles.

OBJECTIVES

Utilize the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to identify and evaluate adverse effects related to the use of mepolizumab in treating CRSwNP.

METHODS

From Q12021 until Q12023, the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database was queried to identify mepolizumab adverse reactions (MARs), which were compared between the two treatment groups of interest, CRSwNP and asthma. Individual MARs (iMARs) were modeled using zero-truncated Poisson regression, while serious MARs and outcomes were modeled using logistic regression.

RESULTS

For the CRSwNP-tx group, there were 80 MARs (16 serious MARs, 19 serious outcomes, 0 deaths). For the asthma-tx group, there were 4779 MARs (4308 serious MARs, 2334 serious outcomes, 124 deaths). 68,479 iMARs were observed, with 1198 iMARS in the CRSwNP-tx group. Common CRSwNP-tx iMARs were pulmonary (27.1 %), generalized (10.9 %), neurologic (9.9 %), and hematologic (9.0 %). Age < 50, RR 1.63 [1.41, 1.90], and asthma, RR 5.73 [4.29, 7.66], were significant predictive factors for total iMAR, while sex, RR 1.00 [0.86, 1.16], was not. Within the CRSwNP-tx group, concurrent asthma treatment increased the odds of having a serious MAR by 11.77 [3.02, 53.74] and serious outcome by 26.58 [3.23, 605.81].

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab treatment of CRSwNP is associated with fewer individual adverse reactions. Pulmonary reactions were, by far, the most common type of adverse reaction. Concurrent asthma treatment in CRSwNP-only-tx increases the number of reactions, and the seriousness of reactions and outcomes.

Dupilumab-related late adverse events in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody (dupilumab) has demonstrated favorable sinonasal outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is mainly caused by type 2 inflammation. Although increased blood eosinophil levels and injection site symptoms are frequently observed as acute adverse events (AEs) of dupilumab, limited knowledge is available regarding the late AEs of dupilumab for CRSwNP.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the late AEs following the initiation of dupilumab treatment for CRSwNP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients with CRSwNP treated with dupilumab for > 3 months were enrolled, and their clinical data were collected from their medical records.

RESULTS

Six (11.8%) patients experienced late AEs. One case of eczema with pruritus, one case of psoriasis-like dermatitis, two cases of severe rash, one case of malignant lymphoma, and one case of alopecia areata were observed. Skin disorders were the most common late AEs in this study. It is a Th1-inflammatory disease, and its mechanism is thought to be due to the immune imbalance caused by dupilumab. We could not confirm whether malignant lymphoma in our case was caused by dupilumab use.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Skin disorders are often late AEs associated with dupilumab; therefore, careful monitoring after dupilumab initiation should be considered.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by local chronic inflammation of the mucous membranes of the nose and paranasal sinuses. It affects approximately 5% of the population.

METHODS

This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature, with particular attention to current national and international guidelines.

RESULTS

CRS is defined by, and diagnosed on the basis of, a combination of symptoms and objective findings of nasal endoscopy and imaging studies. It markedly impairs quality of life and gives rise to both direct and indirect health care costs. In 20-45% of cases, CRS is associated with comorbid bronchial asthma and a significantly elevated risk of further diseases (e.g., COPD, OR 1.73; depression, HR 1.50; obstructive sleep apnea, OR 1.91; carcinoma, OR 1.14-5.30). CRS is primarily treated medically with topical steroids (standardized mean difference of nasal symptoms, -0.63 (95% confidence interval [-0.89; -0.37]; standardized mean difference of quality of life as measured by SNOT -22, -5.46 [-8.08; -2.84]), as well as with nasal lavage and, as an option, systemic steroids (and antibiotics where appropriate). If appropriate medical treatment fails to bring about adequate and sustained improvement, endoscopic sinus surgery is indicated. This improves the individual symptoms, the overall symptom score, and patients' quality of life. Severe refractory CRS with nasal polyposis can be treated with biological agents.

CONCLUSION

CRS calls for individually adapted medical and/or surgical treatment.

A Biologic With Otologic Consequences: Analysis of Hearing Loss and Teprotumumab Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate otologic adverse reactions (OARs), including hearing loss (OARs-HL) among patients taking teprotumumab, a new biologic approved for the treatment of active thyroid eye disease, using publicly available pharmacovigilance reporting data.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

METHODS

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) was queried for cases involving teprotumumab from 2020Q1 to 2023Q1. Patient demographics and adverse reactions (OAR and OAR-HL) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to predict OAR and OAR-HL, and disproportionality analysis was performed using OpenVigil.

RESULTS

A total of 2,109 teprotumumab-AR cases were reported, of which 296 (14.05%; mean age 55.46 yr) were OARs. Of these, 149 (7.06%) reported OAR-HL and 194 (9.20%) reported other OAR (e.g., tinnitus, ear discomfort, vertigo), with 47 (2.23%) reporting both. Disproportionality analysis showed a reported odds ratio (ROR) for OARs-HL of 44.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.40-52.55; p < 0.001). Age was associated with RORs of 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07) for developing OARs and specifically OARs-HL, respectively (p < 0.01). Age 50 and 65 years and older were associated with RORs of 2.54 (95% CI, 1.16-6.38) and 3.36 (95% CI, 1.75-6.53), respectively, for OARs-HL (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study using FAERS data suggests an increased risk of OARs, specifically hearing loss, associated with teprotumumab. Increasing age was a significant predictor of OARs. Audiometric counseling and evaluation should be considered with teprotumumab therapy in Graves' orbitopathy patients, especially in older patients.

Real-World Adverse Events After Type 2 Biologic use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the frequency and nature of adverse events related to type 2 biologic use in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), including dupilumab and mepolizumab.

METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective study of real-world patient data. Patients were included if they have a diagnosis of CRSwNP, have undergone at least one endoscopic sinus surgery, and have taken at least two doses of dupilumab or mepolizumab between January 1, 2016, and July 1, 2023. Data collected include clinicodemographic information and past medical/surgical history. The primary outcomes are the incidence and types of adverse events. Adjusted odds ratio was calculated to compare the biologics using logistic regression. Risk factors for developing adverse events were investigated.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients on dupilumab and 51 patients on mepolizumab were included. Thirty-nine (45%) and 10 (20%) patients respectively encountered adverse events, which differed from phase 3 trial data. The adjusted odds ratio for adverse event rates between these two treatment groups was 3.8 (95% CI, 1.5-10.5). The most common adverse events for dupilumab were arthralgia (16%), rash (14%), and conjunctivitis or xerophthalmia (10%). The main adverse events for mepolizumab were headache (6%) and fatigue (6%). Seven dupilumab and three mepolizumab patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. The average duration of treatment was 22.5 (range: 1-77) months for mepolizumab and 15.9 (range: 1-35) months for dupilumab.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab and mepolizumab have distinct adverse event profiles. This study contributes to informing clinicians' decisions regarding the use of type 2 biologics in CRSwNP patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3054-3059, 2024.

Ocular Surface Adverse Events are not Associated with Dupilumab use in Nasal Polyp Treatment

OBJECTIVES

Ocular surface reactions (OSR) have been associated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. However, the association of dupilumab-associated OSR (DA-OSR) for nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treatment has not been studied. We evaluated DA-OSR for CRSwNP treatment using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

FAERS was queried for any general ocular reactions (DA-GOR) from 2019Q1 to 2022Q4. DA-OSR were subcategorized from DA-GOR and compared between treatment groups (CRSwNP, asthma, AD). Logistic regression was used to predict DA-OSR. Disproportionality analysis (DPA) of DA-OSR was performed using OpenVigil.

RESULTS

There were 60,198 total observations, of which 5344 were treated for CRSwNP. The prevalence of DA-GOR and DA-OSR was greatest for AD (15.3%, 7.8%), followed by CRSwNP (12.2%, 6.7%) and asthma (9.2%, 3.5%). The most commonly reported OSRs were dry eyes (35.9%), conjunctivitis (15.7%), and increased lacrimation (11.0%). The reported odds ratio (ROR) of CRSwNP-treated DA-OSR was 0.84 (0.73-0.97; p = 0.015), compared to 1.29 (1.20-1.40; p < 0.001) for AD and 0.66 (0.59-0.73; p < 0.001) for asthma. For CRSwNP treatment, the DA-OSR ROR was 0.97 (0.90-1.03; p = 0.3) for men and 0.78 (0.73-0.83, p < 0.001) for older adults (age > 50). ROR in the DPA for DA-OSR was 12.5 (12.2-12.8; p < 0.001) for any indication and 0.58 (0.53-0.64; p < 0.001) for CRSwNP treatment only.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are limitations to FAERS, this study confirms the association between dupilumab and OSR for AD treatment, and does not support an association between dupilumab and OSR for CRSwNP treatment. Younger adults experience more DA-OSR in CRSwNP treatment without a specific predilection for sex.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 134:2602-2608, 2024.

Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a common inflammatory condition, with subtypes like aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and central compartment atopic disease sharing a common type 2 inflammatory pathway. Respiratory biologic therapies have been developed that target type 2 inflammation. In this article, we discuss the use of respiratory biologic therapies for nasal polyposis in general, as well as within the various subtypes of nasal polyps. Further, we discuss future roles of novel biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in nasal polyposis.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Treated With Dupilumab: Real-World Use and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Biologic medications are increasingly incorporated into chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) management. However, little is known about prescribing patterns in real-world settings and how this relates to proposed international guidelines and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize use patterns of dupilumab for CRSwNP better in relation to proposed guidelines and explore real-world outcomes.

METHODS

We used the TriNetX Web-based tool to identify patients who were prescribed dupilumab for CRSwNP. Patients prescribed dupilumab for a CRSwNP indication were included for analysis. Dupilumab initiation criteria were determined via the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 (EPOS2020).

RESULTS

In total, 121 patients were identified who were prescribed dupilumab for a CRSwNP indication. Of these, 86 (71%) met EPOS2020 indications for biologic initiation and 35 (29%) did not. Overall, patients had significant improvements in the 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test scores (mean improvement of 24.3 points) and nasal polyp scores (mean improvement of 1.0 point). However, 20 patients (30%) did not show meaningful improvement in the 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test scores. Twenty-one patients (17%) failed a previous biologic attempt. Therapy was discontinued by six patients (5%) due to side effects, and by six (5%) owing to a lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, patients prescribed dupilumab for CRSwNP frequently may not meet EPOS2020 Guidelines. Over 25% of those who do not meet criteria may not have CRSwNP. Overall, dupilumab use among well-selected patients appears to be safe and effective. Further real-world study of biologic use for CRSwNP will help improve its judicious use and identify populations who benefit most from biologic therapies.

Safety of triazole antifungals: a pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS

Background

Triazole antifungals are widely used as broad-spectrum antifungal activity; however, there are many undetected and unreported adverse events (AEs).

Methods

Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the third quarter (Q3) of 2021 were selected for disproportionality analysis to assess the connection between antifungal triazoles, and AEs and important medical events (IMEs).

Results

A total of 22,566 records associated with triazole antifungals were identified, with 9584 triazole antifungal-IME pairs. The following system organ classes (SOCs) appeared as significant signals: 'Endocrine disorders' [reported odds ratio (ROR) = 167.94], 'Metabolism and nutrition disorders' (ROR = 46.30), and 'Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' (ROR = 21.37). Strong signals were observed with respiratory failure, rash, hepatic function abnormal, and hypokalemia. Uncommon security signals included a change in the QT interval, neurotoxicity, pseudoaldosteronism, and hallucinations.

Conclusion

Various triazole antifungals cause AEs of different types and intensities of association. Our results are broadly consistent with prescribing information and previous studies; however, additional pharmacoepidemiological studies are required to verify AEs with modest incidence but high signal.

Plain Language Summary

A study on the adverse effects of triazole antifungals Introduction: The triazole antifungals we studied include fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Triazole antifungals are widely used as broad-spectrum antifungals; however, there are many undetected and unreported adverse events (AEs).Materials and Methods: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database contains AEs reported to the FDA by different countries regarding post-marketing drugs. Through the FAERS database, we retrieved a total of 22,566 AE reports related to triazole antifungals. We not only counted information about patients' gender, age, weight, reporting country, outcome indicators, and indications but also analyzed the system organ classes (SOCs) of AEs, and the number of reported drug-related AEs and the degree of relevance.Results: We found a total of 22,566 records related to triazole antifungal agents, of which 9584 reports made important medical events (IMEs) about triazole antifungal agents, which are serious AEs. The following SOCs appear as important signals: 'endocrine disorders', 'metabolic and nutritional disorders', and 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders'. Triazole antifungals produce AEs, such as respiratory failure, rash, hepatic function abnormal, and hypokalemia. They also produce uncommon AEs, including changes in the QT interval, neurotoxicity, pseudoaldosteronism, and hallucinations.Conclusion: By analyzing data from the FAERS database, we identified more AEs associated with these five triazole antifungals than were indicated in the instructions and our findings provide additional insight into triazole-related AEs to inform clinicians before and during treatment.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps management in the biologic therapy era: an international YO-IFOS survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the consistency between the international guidelines recommendations and worldwide standard practices regarding diagnostic work-up and follow-up strategies for managing patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) in the era of monoclonal antibodies.

METHODS

A questionnaire developed by the Rhinology section of the Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (Yo-IFOS) included items regarding the management of CRSwNP patients, monoclonal prescription, surgical and follow-up procedures, awareness of biologicals availability, and other relevant clinical practices. The online survey was directed to otolaryngologists and distributed in Europe, North America, South America, and the Middle East through otolaryngological and/or rhinological societies.

RESULTS

A total of 202 responses were analyzed; the mean participants' age was 45 ± 11 (73% men and 27% women), and 31% were from the United States, Canada 19%, Europe 45%, Middle East and South America 5%. Only 60% of the respondents declared using validated symptoms and endoscopic score systems in their clinical practice. Several practice discrepancies emerged in our cohort, including preferred surgical approach, prescription of preoperative oral steroids, and perioperative antibiotics (59% and 58%, respectively), as well as divergent awareness levels of available biologics for CRSwNP worldwide.

CONCLUSIONS

CRSwNP needs a complex and time-consuming assessment, according to the latest guidelines. There seems to be a gap between these recommendations and the real-world data, which should draw more attention to bringing them into uniform clinical practice in the near future.