Quantification of Residual Water in Pharmaceutical Frozen Solutions via 1H Solid-state NMR

Freezing is essential for the stability of biological drug substances and products, particularly in frozen solution formulations and during the primary drying of lyophilized preparations. However, the unfrozen segment within the frozen matrix can alter solute concentration, ionic strength, and stabilizer crystallization, posing risks of increased biophysical instability and faster chemical degradation. While quantifying the unfrozen water content is important for designing stable biopharmaceuticals, there is a lack of analytical techniques for in situ quantitative measurements. In this study, we introduce a 1H magic angle spinning NMR technique to identify the freezing point (Tice) and quantify mobile water content in frozen biologics, applying this method to analyze the freezing of a commercial high-concentration drug product, Dupixent®. Our results demonstrate that water freezing is influenced by buffer salt properties and formulation composition, including the presence of sugar cryoprotectants and protein concentration. Additionally, the 1H chemical shift can probe pH in the unfrozen phase, potentially predicting the microenvironmental acidity in the frozen state. Our proposed methodology provides fresh insights into the analysis of freeze-concentrated solutions, enhancing our understanding of the stability of frozen and lyophilized biopharmaceuticals.

The Inflation Reduction Act: Implications for Medicare spending and access to biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and asthma

KEY POINTS

In 2021, Medicare spending on biologics was $926 million in Part B (FFS) and $1.3 billion in Part D (FFS/MA). Between 2017 and 2021, annual Medicare spending on biologics increased by approximately 200%. Between 2023 and 2025, Medicare Part D OOP costs for biologics will decrease by an estimated 50%-60%.

Prescribing Patterns of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory disease caused by a type 2 T helper cell-mediated immune response to environmental antigens. Approximately 1 in 5 patients with AD presents with moderate to severe disease, and treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration include emollients, topical glucocorticoids, and calcineurin inhibitors. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, improves AD via inhibition of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to characterize the prescribing patterns of dupilumab for AD in adults at a large university-affiliated health system.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted using electronic data from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics database, assessing data from the University of Colorado Medical Campus and its affiliates. The outcome measured was the prevalence of dupilumab prescribed for adults with AD (n=6421), between March 28, 2013, and March 28, 2021. We assessed whether the characteristics of patients who received dupilumab were different from those who did not. Each patient characteristic was assessed using a univariate logistic regression with the binary outcome of receiving or not receiving dupilumab.

RESULTS

We found a population prevalence of 5.6% (6421/114,476) for AD. In our cohort, Black patients with AD were more than twice as likely to have received dupilumab compared to White patients (odds ratio 2.352, 95% CI 1.58-3.39). Patients with a diagnosis of atopic neurodermatitis were approximately twice as likely to have received dupilumab compared to those with other diagnostic variants of AD (odds ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.01-3.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that both patient racial characteristics and specific AD diagnoses were associated with variations in dupilumab prescription patterns.

Overview of use, efficacy, and safety of dupilumab in complex patients: a retrospective, case-series study from a large, urban academic center

Dupilumab has emerged as an effective treatment option for those suffering from moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Since its approval in 2017 by the United States Food and Drug Administration, dupilumab demonstrated efficacy in a wide range of "off-label" dermatologic conditions. With its increasing use, dermatologists must navigate prescribing dupilumab in complex patient populations. To that end, we performed a single-institution, retrospective, case-series study to assess efficacy, tolerability, and safety of dupilumab in elderly, patients on concomitant immunosuppressive/immunomodulating therapies, and those with pre-existing co-morbidities (e.g., malignancies, chronic renal and/or liver diseases, organ transplantation, hematologic malignancies, and infection). We conducted chart reviews of 248 patients who were prescribed dupilumab between January 1, 2017 and August 31, 2021, and identified 64 patients who met the criteria of being in the complex patient group as described above. Our results showed that 87.5% (56/64) of complex patients demonstrated improvement and/or disease clearance on dupilumab. 20.3% (13/64) of them experienced one or more side effects reported as conjunctivitis, seborrheic dermatitis, psoriasiform eruption, xerosis, facial burning sensation, anaphylactic reaction/angioedema, and worsening of AD. 9.4% (6/64) of them discontinued dupilumab due to the side effects. These findings demonstrated that dupilumab can be safely considered in certain complex patient populations such as elderly and those with significant pre-existing co-morbidities and can be safely combined with immunosuppressive medications and/or other biologic therapies. In the future, more studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in these challenging patients with complex medical histories.

Dupilumab (Dupixent) for eosinophilic esophagitis and prurigo nodularis

The FDA has approved the subcutaneously injected interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha antagonist dupilumab (Dupixent – Sanofi/Regeneron) for treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in patients ≥12 years old who weigh ≥40 kg and treatment of prurigo nodularis in adults.

Targeting interleukin 4 receptor alpha on tumor-associated macrophages reduces the pro-tumor macrophage phenotype

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are an abundant tumor-promoting cell type in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Most TAMs exhibit a pro-tumor M2-like phenotype supportive of tumor growth, immune evasion, and metastasis. IL-4 and IL-13 are major cytokines that polarize macrophages to an M2 subset and share a common receptor, IL-4 receptor alpha (IL-4R alpha). Treatment of human ex vivo polarized M2 macrophages and M2 macrophage precursors with IL-4R alpha antagonist antibody Dupilumab (Dupixent^Ⓡ) reduces M2 macrophage features, including a shift in cell surface marker protein expression and gene expression. In animal models of prostate cancer, both pharmacologic inhibition of IL-4R alpha and genetic deletion of IL-4R alpha utilizing an Il4ra -/- mouse model result in decreased CD206 on TAMs. These data support IL-4R alpha as a target to reduce the pro-tumor, M2-like macrophage phenotype as a novel adjunct cancer therapy.

Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients on Dupilumab

Dupilumab is a biologic approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. While it is an effective medication for eczema, ocular side effects are common in patients receiving dupilumab therapy. Greater consideration is needed when evaluating these individuals for corneal refractive surgery. Dupilumab patients may suffer from atopy, a condition that also merits consideration in those desiring refractive surgery. Additional testing and careful consideration are needed, as these patients have an increased risk of dry eye syndrome, keratoconus, cataracts, diffuse lamellar keratitis, viral keratitis, and perioperative infection. This commentary discusses the current understanding of dupilumab ocular side effects and investigates factors to consider when evaluating these patients for corneal refractive surgery.

Outcomes of Dupilumab Treatment versus Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Outside of the SINUS-24 and SINUS-52 trials, there is limited data on the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The objective was to compare dupilumab to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in CRSwNP patients by assessing the change in nasal polyp and SNOT-22 scores post-intervention.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study compared 54 CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab to 54 CRSwNP patients who underwent FESS with both cohorts treated with topical corticosteroids. The primary endpoints were change in NPS and change in overall SNOT-22 score. Secondary endpoints were change in SNOT-22 domain scores and change in SNOT-22 olfaction score.

RESULTS

FESS patients had a greater improvement in NPS (5.18 ± 2.01) compared to dupilumab patients (4.27 ± 1.98, p=0.02). There was no significant difference in terms of the change in overall SNOT-22 score. Dupilumab patients had greater improvement in the extra-nasal rhinologic SNOT-22 domain scores (4.87 ± 3.91) compared to FESS patients (2.93 ± 4.32, p=0.02). There was a greater improvement in the SNOT-22 olfaction scores for dupilumab patients (2.35 ± 2.17) compared to FESS patients (1.48 ± 2.24, p=0.04). Dupilumab patients were followed on average for 12.20 months and FESS patients for 17.90 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, both therapies are effective at reducing symptoms in patients with CRSwNP by SNOT-22. Dupilumab patients reported improved olfaction and decreased cough, post-nasal drainage, and thick nasal drainage as compared to FESS patients while FESS patients had a greater reduction in polyp burden. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A review of dupilumab in the treatment of atopic diseases

Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal IgG4 antibody directed against the alpha subunit of the IL-4 receptor and prevents the signaling of IL-4 and IL-13, two type 2 cytokines known to be important drivers of atopic diseases. In March of 2017, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dupilumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults that is uncontrolled with topical medications, becoming the first biologic agent approved to treat this chronic skin condition. In October of 2018, Dupilumab received approval by the FDA as an add-on maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma aged 12 years or older with an eosinophilic phenotype or with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. This review summarizes the characteristics of dupilumab and the clinical research that has been published to date, including treatment efficacy and adverse events.