Upadacitinib for the management of bullous pemphigoid coexisting with psoriasis vulgaris: a case report and literature review

Both bullous pemphigoid (BP) and psoriasis are common immune-related dermatological conditions in clinical practice, but the co-occurrence of these two diseases is rare. Currently, there is no consensus on the long-term safe and effective treatment for patients with both BP and psoriasis. JAK inhibitors are emerging as targeted therapeutic drugs that act by inhibiting Janus kinase activity, regulating the JAK/STAT pathway, blocking the transduction pathway of key proinflammatory cytokines, and influencing T-cell differentiation. These cytokines upstream of the JAK/STAT pathway play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Upadacitinib, a second-generation JAK inhibitor with high selectivity, demonstrates promising potential.This case report aims to provide a description of the successful treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) and psoriasis vulgaris by using upadacitinib, highlighting significant clinical outcomes. Additionally, we aim to analyze the underlying mechanism of upadacitinib in treating these two comorbidities by reviewing relevant literature from both domestic and international sources. Based on our clinical observations, upadacitinib appears to be a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with concurrent BP and psoriasis, offering valuable insights for developing appropriate treatment strategies in clinical practice.

Predictive factors for responders to upadacitinib treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib is therapeutically effective for atopic dermatitis (AD). However, predictive factors for high responders to upadacitinib have not been established in real-world clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictive factors for responders to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, defined as achievers of investigator's global assessment (IGA) 0/1 with ≥ 2-point improvement from basal IGA.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from August 2021 to July 2023 on 159 AD patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg and 52 patients with 30 mg. Patients in each group were categorized into responders (achievers of IGA 0/1 at week 12) and non-responders (non-achievers). We compared baseline values of clinical and laboratory parameters between responders and non-responders. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect variables predicting responders. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used for evaluating prediction capabilities of the variables.

RESULTS

In logistic regression analysis, responders to 15 mg upadacitinib were associated with lower total EASI and higher age whereas responders to 30 mg were associated with lower LDH and lower IgE.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower total EASI and higher age may predict responders to upadacitinib 15 mg while lower IgE and lower LDH may predict responders to 30 mg.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib for Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a real-world clinical study

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical trials presented efficacy and safety of Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib through 52 weeks for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib through 48 weeks in real-world clinical practice for Japanese AD patients (aged ≥12 years).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 287 patients with moderate-to severe AD treated with 15 mg (n = 216) or 30 mg (n = 71) of upadacitinib daily. Effectiveness was assessed using eczema area severity index (EASI) scores, atopic dermatitis control tool (ADCT), peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS), and investigator's global assessment (IGA). Safety was evaluated through the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

From baseline, EASI, ADCT, PP-NRS, and IGA rapidly reduced at week 4, and the reduction was maintained until week 48 of treatment with upadacitinib at both doses. Achievement rates of EASI 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 at week 48 were 63.5, 30.2, and 7.9 in 15 mg group, and 77.4, 54.8, and 3.2% in 30 mg group, respectively. Acne and herpes zoster were frequent, but no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib was therapeutically effective and tolerable for moderate-to-severe AD through 48 weeks in real-world clinical practice.

Early itch relief with upadacitinib predicts later skin clearance in Atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Though Janus kinase inhibitors such as upadacitinib rapidly relieve itch in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients, how early itch relief impacts later skin clearance is not examined.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine if early itch relief by upadacitinib could predict complete skin clearance in later phases.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 105 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with upadacitinib 15 mg/day. Eczema area and severity index (EASI), atopic dermatitis control tool, and achievement rate of EASI 100 were evaluated at weeks 4, 12, and 24. The threshold of early peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) predicting later skin clearance was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, and predictors for EASI 100 achievement were determined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of achieving EASI 100 at week 24 was extremely higher in patients who achieved week 2 PP-NRS ≤ 1 (42.9%) than in non-achievers (1.4%). The logistic regression analysis showed that the achievement of week 2 PP-NRS ≤ 1 and low body mass index were associated with achievement of EASI 100 at weeks 12 and 24.

CONCLUSIONS

The achievement of week 2 PP-NRS ≤ 1 may predict later skin clearance in upadacitinib treatment.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a rheumatic disorder that may be responsible for relevant articular impairment. The recently licensed Janus Kinase (JaK) inhibitors represent a new opportunity to improve PsA treatment. This review deals with the clinical usefulness of the selective JaK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) in patients with PsA.

COVERED AREAS

Two phase-III studies are available: SELECT-PsA 1, performed in patients with an inadequate response to non-biological therapies, and SELECT-PsA 2, conducted in biologic-experienced patients. Long-term extension results and post-hoc analysis data of these two trials are also available.

EXPERT OPINION

The results provided by the trials indicate that UPA may be used to treat all of the clinical manifestations of PsA. Venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular events, and malignancy, the most feared adverse events associated with JaK inhibitor use, were not increased in the trial populations, yet long-term observational studies are needed to make sure that UPA is safe in this respect.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors Differentially Inhibit Specific Cytokine Signals in the Mesenteric Lymph Node Cells of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors [JAKinibs] are effective small molecule therapies for treating Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. By preventing JAKs from phosphorylating signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins, JAKinibs disrupt cytokine signalling pathways that promote inflammation. Despite considerable overlap in the JAKs they target, first- and second-generation JAKinibs display different clinical efficacies in CD and UC.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative phosflow study of four JAKinibs [filgotinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and deucravacitinib] to observe subtle mechanistic differences that may dictate their clinical behaviour. Resected mesenteric lymph node [MLN] cells from 19 patients [9 CD, 10 UC] were analysed by flow cytometry in the presence or absence of different cytokine stimuli and titrated JAKinibs.

RESULTS

We found a higher potency of the JAK 1/3-preferential inhibitor, tofacitinib, for JAK 3-dependent cytokine signalling pathways in comparison to filgotinib, but a higher potency of the JAK 1-preferential inhibitors, filgotinib and upadacitinib, for JAK 3-independent cytokine signalling pathways. Deucravacitinib, a TYK2-preferential inhibitor, demonstrated a much narrower selectivity by inhibiting only IL-10 and IFN-β pathways, albeit more potently than the other JAKinibs. Additionally, we found some differences in the sensitivity of immune cells from CD versus UC, and patients with versus without a CD-associated NOD2 polymorphism, to phosphorylate signal transducer and activator of transcriptions in response to specific cytokine stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their similarities, differences exist in the relative potencies of different JAKinibs against distinct cytokine families, to explain their clinical efficacy.

A Gastroenterologist's guide to drug interactions of small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease

Small molecule drugs are becoming increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, unlike monoclonal antibody drugs, which have few interactions with other medications, the pharmacokinetics of small molecule drugs are complex and may be influenced by a myriad of drug-drug interactions (DDI) as well as by patient characteristics and food intake. This review aims to provide a concise practical guide to small molecule drug interactions for the use of IBD physicians. It starts with a brief overview of the main metabolizing enzymes and transporters involved in drug interactions and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approach to determining drug-interaction hazard thresholds. It is then followed by a more detailed review of the pharmacokinetics of four novel small molecules approved in IBD: Tofacitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib, and Ozanimod, including their known interactions and specific warnings. This review will also inform readers on challenges in determining the actual magnitude of interactions and their clinical relevance, including the arbitrary nature of some hazard thresholds, the inference of the impact on metabolizing enzymes and transporters from single-drug assays which may not reflect poly-pharmaceutical regimens, and other challenges in this field which the IBD physician needs to be cognizant of. In practice, before administering a small molecule drug, it is advisable to evaluate any potential interactions with other medications the patient is receiving. An increased awareness by health care professionals and patients, may reduce the possible risks associated with DDI of small molecule IBD drugs.

Upadacitinib in Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

The small molecule and oral selective and reversible Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe active Crohn's disease (CD) in adult patients since April 2023 by EMA/FDA.

AREAS COVERED

The approval is based on the two induction studies a maintenance study showing that upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy was superior to placebo. The approval of upadacitinib in CD expands the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Upadacitinib is the first and only JAK inhibitor approved in patients with CD and provides a novel mechanism of action and the first advanced oral treatment option for patients with CD. Upadacitinib is approved for the treatment of other immunologically mediated disorders, including ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis arthritis, axial spondylarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. Treatment of atopic dermatitis has been approved from the age of 12 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Upadacitinib may cause relevant changes of our current treatment algorithms for Crohn's disease. Further real world studies and head-to-head comparisons are needed to position upadacitinib in our current treatment algorithms for CD.

Practical Use of Upadacitinib in Patients with Severe Atopic Dermatitis in a Real-World Setting: A Systematic Review

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This systematic review aims to summarize the most recent data in terms of effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of severe AD in a real-world setting. The review included a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search initially identified 242 studies. Of these, 214 were excluded after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We then conducted a full-text review of 25 studies, of which 17 met our inclusion criteria and were therefore included in our systematic review. The analysis of real-world studies showed high effectiveness of upadacitinib, in terms of both clinical signs and subjective symptoms, in different patient populations, including those resistant to other treatments. No new significant safety concerns have emerged as compared to randomized clinical trials.

Improvement of severe alopecia areata in an adolescent patient on upadacitinib

Recently, alopecia areata (AA) treatment via the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway has been reported. However, as baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor is only approved for adult patients, children, and adolescent patients still lack treatment options. We present a case that showed improvement of severe AA in an adolescent patient on upadacitinib, which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in patients with rheumatoid disease or atopic dermatitis (AD) in children aged 12 years or older and weighing 40 kg or more. Herein, we suggest that upadacitinib can be a good alternative for adolescent patients with AA, particularly those who may also have AD.

Efficacy of oral JAK1 or JAK1/2 inhibitor for treating refractory pruritus in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A retrospective case series

Refractory pruritus is the most distressing, disease-related symptom in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB), inducing an itch-scratch-blister cycle. Chronic inflammation is a hallmark of DEB, thus upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and Janus kinase (JAK) signaling may play a role in DEB-related pruritus. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of DEB patients with refractory pruritus who were treated with either baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, or upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor. Patients received baricitinib (4 mg) or upadacitinib (15 mg) once a day for 2-32 weeks. A total of 12 DEB patients (six recessive DEB and six dominant DEB) were included in this study. The mean±SD baseline pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.5 ± 1.7. Upadacitinib or baricitinib treatment resulted in a rapid and sustained decrease in itch. Four out of 12 patients (33.3%) and seven out of 10 patients (70%) showed a decrease of at least 3 points in the pruritus VAS score from baseline at weeks 2 and 4, respectively. The mean percentage changes from baseline in pruritus VAS scores at weeks 2 and 4 were -42.9% and -52.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed greater reductions in the pruritus VAS score in the baricitinib group (n = 5) compared to the upadacitinib group (n = 7), and in patients with epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (n = 3) compared to other subtypes of DEB (n = 9); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Three out of 10 (33.3%) patients showed at least a 2-point reduction in pain intensity from baseline at week 4. Eight out of 12 patients (66.7%) also showed a reduction in the number of new blisters, which correlated with a reduction in the pruritus score. No patient discontinued treatment because of serious adverse events. Our results suggest that JAK1 or JAK1/2 inhibitors could be a promising treatment option for DEB-related pruritus. Long-term safety should be assessed in future studies.

An Update on Current Clinical Management and Emerging Treatments in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a severe, debilitating, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent painful nodules, abscesses and draining sinus tracts in intertriginous areas. While this condition appears to stem from follicular unit dysfunction, its cause is multifactorial and the exact pathogenesis has yet to be fully elucidated. These factors make treatment selection challenging and contribute to variable therapeutic response among affected patients. Typical regimens consist of a combination of medical and surgical modalities, tailored to individual responses. However, HS is often refractory to traditional treatments, prompting the need for newer and more effective therapies. Herein, we review current and emerging HS therapies.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in a JAK inhibitor patient: A case report

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are novel molecules increasingly prescribed for various dermatologic conditions. However, the Food and Drug Administration recently reported increased risks of malignancy in patients taking this class of medication. To shed more light on this potential adverse effect, we present a patient with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma possibly associated with his treatment with a JAK inhibitor for atopic dermatitis. To our knowledge, there are no reported cases of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in association with JAK inhibitors in the literature. We highlight the importance of remaining cautious when prescribing this new class of medication, especially in patients with risk factors for malignancy. Moreover, when faced with atypical presentations of atopic dermatitis, we stress the need for a biopsy to make the correct diagnosis prior to treatment. Lastly, we encourage further studies to better characterize the malignancy risk associated with JAK inhibitors.

Effects of upadacitinib on enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of SELECT-PsA 1 and 2

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the effect of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (UPA15) on enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis from the SELECT-PsA Phase 3 trials.

METHODS

Patients with an inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 non-biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 1) or ≥ 1 biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 2) received UPA15, adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo (weeks 0-24) switched to UPA15 (week 24 onward). The Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index were used to assess improvement in enthesitis, enthesitis resolution, maintenance of enthesitis resolution, and protection from enthesitis development through week 56.

RESULTS

Data from 639 patients receiving UPA15 and 635 patients receiving placebo (including 317 patients who switched from placebo to UPA15) were analysed. UPA15 led to higher rates of enthesitis resolution vs placebo at week 24 (LEI: 59.8% vs 38.0%; SPARCC index: 50.6% vs 31.5%, respectively) and greater improvements in the LEI (-1.7 vs -1.0) and SPARCC index (-3.4 vs -1.9); improvements were maintained through week 56. Improvements were observed after 12 weeks of UPA15 treatment. Over 90% of patients without enthesitis (LEI = 0) at baseline receiving UPA15 were enthesitis-free at week 56, and UPA15 prevented recurrence of enthesitis at week 56 in > 80% of patients with enthesitis at baseline who achieved resolution (LEI = 0) at week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

UPA15 is associated with a comprehensive improvement in enthesitis, with improvements observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, treatment with UPA15 was associated with maintaining an enthesitis-free state after resolution and protection against new-onset enthesitis.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT03104400 (SELECT-PsA 1) and NCT03104374 (SELECT-PsA 2).

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the risk of Herpes zoster with biological therapies and selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitors in atopic dermatitis

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients have an increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). The relationship of dupilumab, tralokinumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib to HZ incidence in AD patients remains unclear.

Aim

To evaluate and compare the incidence and risk of HZ among patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis treated with advanced systemic therapies.

Material and methods

Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid Medline and Embase. The primary outcome was incidence of HZ in patients with moderate to severe AD receiving placebo or the aforementioned treatments. A frequentist random-effects NMA was conducted with odds ratio.

Results

Our search identified 16 trials comprising 10,689 patients. Upadacitinib was associated with a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of HZ compared to placebo (OR = 2.55 [1.09, 5.95] and (OR = 4.29 [1.89, 9.74], respectively) and compared to various dupilumab doses (OR = 4.48 [1.29, 15.57], 3.61 [1.28, 10.18] and 7.54 [2.21, 25.68], 6.09 [2.24, 16.52], respectively). Upadacitinib 30 mg was associated with a higher incidence of HZ when compared to upadacitinib 15 mg (OR = 1.68 [1.19, 2.38]). Abrocitinib 200 mg was associated with a higher increase in HZ compared to placebo (OR = 3.34 [1.34, 8.31]). According to SUCRA ranks, both JAK-1 inhibitors had a higher cumulative incidence of HZ compared to dupilumab.

Conclusions

JAK-1 inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher incidence of HZ compared to dupilumab and placebo. Our results suggest that recombinant HZ vaccination should be highly considered for all adult patients prior to starting oral JAK-1 inhibitors.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of adults with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA)

INTRODUCTION

Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory condition with axial and peripheral musculoskeletal involvement, fulfilling criteria of axSpA in the absence of advanced radiographic sacroiliitis. While appropriate treatment is required for chronic pain and disability resulting from disease progression, the limited availability of treatment options becomes evident. Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was approved in Europe, the United States, and other countries for management of nr-axSpA with inadequate response to existing therapies.

AREA COVERED

This review summarizes essential drug profiles, efficacy, and safety of upadacitinib for nr-axSpA in conjunction with data pertaining to radiographic axSpA.

EXPERT OPINION

In a phase 3 trial, upadacitinib exhibited efficacy for patients with nr-axSpA, irrespective of prior exposures to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The safety profiles of upadacitinib in nr-axSpA mirrored those in other indications, underscoring its potential as a promising treatment option for nr-axSpA. Concurrently, physicians should be aware of the absence of real-world data, longitudinal efficacy and safety, direct comparative studies between upadacitinib and bDMARDs in nr-axSpA, and evidence for precision medicine to identify patients who may optimally benefit from upadacitinib over bDMARDs. Future research is imperative to facilitate the effective utilization of upadacitinib in daily clinical practice.

Differential properties of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of cytosolic tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine signal transduction, including cytokines involved in a range of inflammatory diseases, such as RA, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and IBD. Several small-molecule JAK inhibitors (JAKis) are now approved for the treatment of various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. There are, however, key differences between these agents that could potentially translate into unique clinical profiles. Each JAKi has a unique chemical structure, resulting in a distinctive mode of binding within the catalytic cleft of the target JAK, and giving rise to distinct pharmacological characteristics. In addition, the available agents have differing selectivity for JAK isoforms, as well as off-target effects against non-JAKs. Other differences include effects on haematological parameters, DNA damage repair, reproductive toxicity and metabolism/elimination. Here we review the pharmacological profiles of the JAKis abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Biologic and Small-Molecule Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, necessitates long-term medical therapy to manage symptoms and prevent complications. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a strategy to optimize treatment efficacy, particularly with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) alpha drugs. This review explores the role of TDM for non-anti-TNF advanced therapies in IBD, focusing on vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, risankizumab and ozanimod. Methods: The literature search, conducted through OVID (Medline) and PubMed, delves into proactive versus reactive TDM, timing of monitoring and methods for measuring drug levels and anti-drug antibodies. Results: While ustekinumab and vedolizumab exhibit exposure-response relationships, consensus on target levels and the role of TDM adjustments remains elusive. Limited data on risankizumab suggest a dose-dependent response, while for small molecule therapies (janus kinase inhibitors and ozanimod), the absence of real-world data and commercially available TDM tools pose challenges. Conclusion: At present, with the available data, there is a limited role for TDM in non-anti-TNF biologic and small-molecule therapies. This review underscores the need for further research to delineate the utility of TDM in guiding treatment decisions for these agents.

Drug Survival of Upadacitinib and Predicting Factors of Discontinuation in Adult Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Italian Multicenter Analysis

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020-August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Real-Life Experience from a Prospective Longitudinal Multicentric Study

BACKGROUND

We provide the first prospective longitudinal multicenter experience on Upadacitinib efficacy and safety profile in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in a real-life context, focusing on clinimetric and ultrasonographic (US) data.

METHODS

RA patients referred to three Italian tertiary Centers who started Upadacitinib were enrolled as per ACR/EULAR classification criteria and prospectively reviewed. The primary aim of this study was to assess changes in clinimetric and ultrasonographic scores through time (at baseline, after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months from the beginning of the therapy). Secondary aims were to: (i) estimate the impact of biologic lines of treatment and concomitant therapies on response to therapy; (ii) explore changes in laboratory parameters; and (iii) find potential predictive factors associated with response to therapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (49 Females and 22 Males) were included. Clinimetric scores, including the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) and Simplified Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and US findings (synovial hypertrophy and power Doppler) significantly improved (p = 0.029, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). Regression analysis revealed a significant association between the concomitant csDMARDs therapy at baseline and the lack of improvement in synovial hypertrophy [OR -4.824, p = 0.010] as well as with DAS28-CRP [OR -0.690, p = 0.045], whereas the presence of increased ESR or CRP at baseline was able to predict a significant improvement in SDAI [OR 8.481, p = 0.003]. No adverse events, such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or herpes zoster virus infection, were reported during this study observation.

CONCLUSION

Our real-life experience confirms the efficacy of Upadacitinib in terms of clinical and ultrasonographic improvement, as well as displaying a good safety profile.

Costo per Number Needed to Treat (NNT) di upadacitinib nel trattamento dei pazienti bio-exposed con rettocolite ulcerosa attiva da moderata a grave

Background:

Only limited information is available on cost efficacy of the advanced therapies for the treatment of ulcerative rectocolitis. We evaluated the efficacy and the treatment costs of these advanced therapies in the treatment of bio-exposed (primary failure to a biological agent) patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis.

Methods:

Data from a previous network meta-analysis (NMA) in the treatment of bio-exposed patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis was used. The analysis involved three therapies approved in Italy for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis: upadacitinib (UPA), ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ). According to the NMA results, the analysis was conducted considering two different timepoints: induction and maintenance. The pharmacoeconomic comparison between advanced therapies was carried out to estimate the respective cost for the NNT (Number Needed to Treat) compared to placebo using the clinical response (CRes) for the induction and clinical remission (CRem) and endoscopic improvement (EI) for the maintenance. Only the ex-factory price of each advanced therapy was considered. The cost per NNT was adopted as a cost-effectiveness indicator.

Results:

Independently of the timepoint considered (induction or maintenance) and the clinical (CRem and CRes) or endoscopic endpoint (EI) evaluated, UPA had always the lower cost per NNT than UST and VDZ. For example, considering the induction and the CRes, the cost per NNT for upadacitinib (45 mg) was € 7,862.07 compared to € 30,459.38 for ustekinumab (6 mg/kg) and to € 67,868.00 for vedolizumab.

Conclusion:

Upadacitinib is a cost-effective therapeutic option compared to ustekinumab and vedolizumab in the treatment of bio-exposed patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis.

Improvement of Recalcitrant Dissecting Cellulitis of the Scalp After a Trial of Upadacitinib

Dissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) is a rare condition characterized by painful inflammatory nodules and abscesses on the scalp, often leading to sinus tracts and scarring alopecia. We present a case of DCS in a 26-year-old male who experienced significant clinical improvement following a short course of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. The patient received multiple standard treatments such as topical antimicrobials, oral antibiotics, corticosteroids, and intralesional triamcinolone injections, with limited success. However, following the initiation of upadacitinib, the patient reported reduced pain, pustular draining, and bleeding, with significantly improved quality of life. To our knowledge, there is currently a paucity of literature documenting the use of JAK inhibitors for DCS. This case aims to highlight the potential of JAK inhibitors as a therapy for refractory DCS, a condition with limited treatment options.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of upadacitinib as a treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

AIM

To evaluate cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib (targeted synthetic-disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug [ts-DMARD]) as first-line (1 L) treatment versus current treatment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), who had an inadequate response to prior conventional-synthetic (csDMARDs) and/or biologic-DMARDs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

This Excel-based model included patients with moderate (Disease Activity Score [DAS28]: >3.2 to ≤5.1) or severe RA (DAS28 > 5.1). Cost-effectiveness of current treatment (1 L: adalimumab-originator/biosimilar; second-line (2 L): other bDMARDs/tofacitinib) was compared against a new treatment involving two scenarios (1 L: upadacitinib, 2 L: adalimumab-biosimilar [scenario-1]/adalimumab-originator [scenario-2]) for a 10-year time-horizon from societal perspective. Model outcomes included direct and indirect costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), hospitalization days, number of orthopedic surgeries, and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) per QALY.

RESULTS

With the current pathway, estimated total societal costs for 100 RA patients over 10-year period were Saudi Riyal (SAR) 50,450,354 (United States dollars [USD] 13,453,428) (moderate RA) and SAR50,013,945 (USD13,337,052) (severe RA). New pathway (scenario-1) showed that in patients with moderate-to-severe RA, upadacitinib led to higher QALY gain (+8.99 and +15.63) at lower societal cost (cost difference: -SAR2,023,522 [-USD539,606] and -SAR3,373,029 [-USD899,474], respectively). Thus, as 1 L, upadacitinib projects "dominant" ICUR per QALY over current pathway. Moreover, in alternate pathway (scenario-2), upadacitinib also projects "dominant" ICUR per QALY for patient with severe RA (QALY gain: +15.63; cost difference: -SAR 164,536 [-USD43,876]). However, moderate RA was associated with additional cost of SAR1,255,696 (USD334,852) for improved QALY (+8.99) over current pathway (ICUR per QALY: SAR139,742 [USD37,264]). Both scenarios resulted in reduced hospitalization days (scenario-1: -14.83 days; scenario-2: -11.41 days) and number of orthopedic surgeries (scenario-1: -8.36; scenario-2: -6.54) for moderate-to-severe RA over the current treatment pathway.

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib as 1 L treatment in moderate-to-severe RA can considerably reduce healthcare resource burden in KSA, majorly due to reduced drug administration/monitoring/hospitalization/surgical and indirect costs.

Costo per NNT di upadacitinib nel trattamento dei pazienti con dermatite atopica da moderata a severa in Italia

Background:

Targeted systemic therapies, including abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab and upadacitinib, are new treatments for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We evaluated the efficacy and the costs of these targeted systemic therapies in the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe AD.

Methods:

The clinical efficacy was assessed considering the results of a previous network meta-analysis (NMA). The analysis involved five therapies approved in Italy for the treatment of moderate to severe AD: abrocitinib (ABR), baricitinib (BAR), dupilumab (DUP), tralokinumab (TRA) and upadacitinib (UPA). According to the NMA, the cost of the treatment was based on the number of administrations dispensed at 16 weeks and the clinical efficacy was measured by the number needed to treat (NNT) compared to placebo using the improvement ≥ 75% (EASI-75) or ≥ 90 (EASI-90) from baseline of the eczema area and severity index (EASI). Only the ex-factory price of the targeted systemic therapies was considered. The cost per NNT was adopted as a cost-effectiveness indicator.

Results:

At 16 weeks, the cost per NNT based on EASI-75 was lower for UPA 15 mg (€ 6,384.00) compared to BAR 4 mg (€ 11,619.73) and 2 mg (€ 14,524.66), ABR 100 mg (€ 16,265.22), DUP 300 mg (€ 16,115.04) and TRA 300 mg (€ 31,710.24). UPA 15 (€ 8,512.00) also showed the lower cost per NNT based on EASI-90 at 16 weeks compared to BAR 4 mg (€ 14,788.75) and 2 mg (€ 20,862.70), ABR 100 mg (€ 25,922.69), DUP 300 mg (€ 25,992.00) and TRA 300 mg (€ 41,067.36).

Conclusions:

The findings show that upadacitinib is the most cost-effective option (cost per NNT) for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Symptomatic creatine phosphokinase elevation in a Crohn's disease patient caused by upadacitinib

We present a Crohn's disease patient receiving high dose upadacitinib treatment with elevated CPK levels and myopathy, and provide the reader with practical tips on stopping and restarting upadacitinib, emphasizing the need for adequate monitoring.

Successful treatment of anti-PTX3 positive seronegative rheumatoid arthritis with upadacitinib

Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) can be a rapid-progressing and highly disabling disease. Anti-PTX3 autoantibody may be a potential biomarker in SNRA diagnosis. SNRA patients could respond well to upadacitinib.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Chronic Pouchitis, Cuffitis, and Crohn's Disease of the Pouch

Upadacitinib has shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD). The use of upadacitinib in the treatment of chronic antibiotics-refractory pouchitis (CARP), as well as CD of the pouch, has not been previously reported. We treated a series of 6 patients with CARP or CD of the pouch with a minimal 6 weeks of upadacitinib. The patients showed minimal or no significant improvement in clinical and endoscopic presentations. Our findings warrant further study to validate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of CARP or CD of the pouch.

Cytomegalovirus Colitis in a Patient with Severe Treatment Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be reactivated in ulcerative colitis (UC), but its role in progression of inflammation is unclear. Risk factors include severe colitis and treatment with immunosuppressive medications, particularly corticosteroids and immunomodulators.

Methods

We report a case of cytomegalovirus colitis in a pediatric patient with pancolitis who had been refractory to aminosalicylate, infliximab, and ustekinumab and was in clinical remission and with transmural response on upadacitinib.

Results

This is a case of a 13-year-old male with UC refractory to multiple therapies who were in clinical remission on upadacitinib 30 mg daily. He developed an acute increase in symptoms and did not respond to therapy escalation with increased upadacitinib 45 mg daily for 2 weeks and prednisone for 1 week. He was diagnosed with cytomegalovirus colitis on flexible sigmoidoscopy biopsy. He was treated with intravenous ganciclovir with tapering of immunosuppressive regimen. Despite initial response, he underwent subtotal colectomy and subsequent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis.

Conclusions

Despite our patient having multiple risk factors for developing CMV colitis, upadacitinib may have played a role when considering its known impact on the herpes family of viruses. CMV colitis should be evaluated for in any patient who presents with worsening symptoms without evidence of other infection or response to increase in therapy.

Upadacitinib Salvage Therapy for Infliximab-Experienced Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] is a medical emergency treated with intravenous steroids followed by infliximab or cyclosporin in the case of steroid failure with emergent colectomy required in refractory or severe cases. Case series have reported on the effectiveness of tofacitinib for refractory disease, but data regarding the effectiveness of upadacitinib in this setting have not been previously reported. We describe the use of upadacitinib therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC in patients with prior loss of response to infliximab.

METHODS

Six patients who received upadacitinib for steroid-refractory ASUC were identified at two Australian tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres. Patients were followed for up to 16 weeks after discharge with clinical, biochemical and intestinal ultrasound [IUS] outcomes.

RESULTS

All six patients demonstrated clinical response to upadacitinib induction during their inpatient admission. Four patients achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission by week 8, including complete resolution of rectal bleeding and transmural healing assessed by IUS, and sustained clinical remission at week 16. One patient proceeded to colectomy at week 15 due to refractory disease. No adverse events directly attributable to upadacitinib were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib may have a role as a safe and effective salvage therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC in patients who have previously failed to respond to infliximab therapy. Prospective studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib use in this setting before routine use can be recommended.

Use of Upadacitinib in 16 Tofacitinib-refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Single-center Case 2Series

We present a case series of 16 patients with ulcerative colitis who received upadacitinib after failing tofacitinib. Five patients (36%) achieved steroid-free clinical remission. Five (62%) demonstrated endoscopic response, while 2 patients (25%) achieved endoscopic remission. Adverse events were low.

Single-center Experience With Upadacitinib for Adolescents With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective JAK inhibitor approved for adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) and with positive phase 3 data for Crohn's disease (CD). Pediatric off-label use is common due to delays in pediatric approvals; real-world data on UPA are needed to understand the safety and effectiveness in pediatric IBD.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective case series study of adolescents (12-17 years) with inflammatory bowel disease IBD on UPA. The primary outcome was postinduction steroid-free clinical remission (SF-CR) defined as Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI) or Pediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI) ≤10. Secondary outcomes include postinduction clinical response (decrease ≥12.5 in PUCAI/PCDAI), postinduction C-reactive protein (CRP) normalization, 6-month SF-CR, and intestinal ultrasound response and remission. Adverse events were recorded through last follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (9 CD, 10 UC, 1 IBD-U; 55% female; median age 15 years, 90% ≥2 biologics) were treated with UPA for ≥12 weeks (median 51 [43-63] weeks). Upadacitinib was used as monotherapy in 55% and as combination with ustekinumab and vedolizumab in 35% and 10%, respectively. Week 12 SF-CR was achieved in 75% (15/20) and 80% (16/20) with CRP normalization. About 3/4 (14/19) achieved SF-CR at 6 months. Adverse event occurred in 2 patients (10%): Cytomegalovirus colitis requiring hospitalization and hyperlipidemia requiring no treatment. In the 75% with ultrasound monitoring, response and remission were achieved in 77% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While awaiting pediatric registration trials, our data suggest that UPA is effective in inducing and maintaining SF-CR in adolescents with highly-refractory IBD with an acceptable safety profile.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of concomitant psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: a case series

Purpose: The overlap of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) is rare and treating moderate-to-severe cases can be challenging. Conventional immune-suppressive drugs cannot be used long-term, and no biological drugs are currently approved for treating both conditions.Method: We report the cases of four patients with overlapping features of both psoriasis and AD.Result: After being treated with several systemic drugs, including gold-standard treatments for both psoriasis and AD, they received upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg, achieving complete remission. Upadacitinib is an inhibitor of Janus Kinase 1, currently approved for treating moderate-to-severe AD.Conclusion: To date, very limited data are available regarding the efficacy of upadacitinib in psoriasis. In a phase-3 trial on the efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg in patients affected by psoriatic arthritis, 52.3% of patients achieved a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) after one year. Currently, no clinical trials are evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib in plaque psoriasis.

Therapeutic effectiveness of upadacitinib on individual types of rash in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disease with various types of rash, erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification. Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib is effective for moderate-to-severe AD. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of upadacitinib on each rash type in AD patients in real-world clinical practice. Seventy-two Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD were treated with oral upadacitinib 15 mg/day plus topical corticosteroids. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores for erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification on the whole body or on head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, or trunk were assessed at weeks 0, 4, and 12 of treatment. The proportions of patients who achieved resolution or at least 75% reduction of EASI from baseline (EASI 75) for individual rash types were calculated at weeks 4 and 12 on the whole body or each anatomical site. The resolution rates for excoriation, erythema, edema/papulation, or lichenification on the whole body were 38.3%, 23.7%, 21.7%, and 8.3% at week 4 and 18.3%, 18.6%, 11.6%, and 13.3% at week 12, respectively. The EASI scores for all rash types significantly decreased at weeks 4 and 12 compared to week 0. The achievement rates of EASI 75 for excoriation, erythema, edema/papulation, or lichenification on the whole body were 67.2%, 66.7%, 49.2%, and 37.7% at week 4 and 57.3%, 65%, 41%, and 41% at week 12, respectively. The achievement rate of EASI 75 for erythema on head and neck at week 4 (45.3%) was lower than that on upper limbs (71%) and on lower limbs (70.8%), and that on head and neck at week 12 (42.2%) was lower than that on lower limbs (69.2%). These results indicate that upadacitinib is effective for all AD rash types, especially for excoriation and erythema, while head-and-neck erythema might be less responsive to upadacitinib.

Upadacitinib in end stage renal disease: A case of acute severe ulcerative colitis

Recent data, indicating that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be a risk factor for future chronic kidney disease, highlight the need to study the safety and clinical effectiveness of advanced IBD therapies in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2. Upadacitinib, a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. There is also emerging data indicating that JAK inhibition may be clinically effective in the setting of steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). There is, however, a lack of "real-world" data documenting the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with ESRD. Here, we report the use of upadacitinib in a patient with ESRD for the management of steroid-refractory ASUC, demonstrating, for the first time, the safe and clinically effective use of upadacitinib in this population.

Clinical efficacy of JAK inhibitors on enthesitis in spondyloarthropathy: A scoping literature review

BACKGROUND

Enthesitis is a key feature of spondyloarthropathy (SpA). In recent years, JAK inhibitors have emerged as efficacious drugs in the landscape of advanced therapies for patients with SpA.

METHOD

The aim of this scoping literature review was to search the published literature for studies on JAK inhibitors and their effects on enthesitis in patients with SpA and evaluate the data and summarise the findings. The clinical trials reviewed used the Leeds Enthesitis Index, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index, and Maastrich Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib had numerically greater reductions in the enthesitis scores when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

While the JAK inhibitors are therapeutic options for enthesitis in SpA, head-to-head studies are needed to compare the JAK inhibitors against the biological drugs (targeting TNF, IL-17, and IL-12/23) as well as studies showing the effects of JAK inhibitors on enthesitis imaging.

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Introduction

Recent studies have confirmed the possibility of using upadacitinib for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). However, there is no meta-analysis to summarize and quantify the efficacy and safety of the drug, especially for adolescents with AD.

Aim

To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in adults and adolescents with AD.

Material and methods

We developed this systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Risk-of-bias assessment tool, RoB2 (revised version 2019) was used for quality assessment.

Results

Four RCTs were enrolled in the analysis, 3 of which on both adults and adolescents, while the other on adults only. For either adults or adolescents, the group treated with upadacitinib all had better performance than controls: EASI-75 (adults): RR = 4.68, 95% CI: 4.09, 5.35; NRS4 (adults): RR = 4.07, 95% CI: 3.15, 5.25; EASI-75 (adolescents): RR = 4.16, 95% CI: 2.70, 6.42; NRS4 (adolescents): RR = 4.52, 95% CI: 2.49, 8.21. Furthermore, upadacitinib 30 mg was more effective than 15 mg. For serious AEs, upper respiratory tract infection and headache, there was no significant difference between the upadacitinib group and controls. However, the treatment of upadacitinib may increase the risk of nasopharyngitis, increase blood creatine phosphokinase and cause acne.

Conclusions

Upadacitinib seems to be a promising drug for AD. More long-term and larger-sized randomized clinical trials are required to further assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib for AD.

Upadacitinib in Crohn's Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety

Crohn's disease (CD) presents a formidable challenge as a chronic inflammatory condition. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess upadacitinib, a novel Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, regarding its efficacy, safety, and mechanistic insights in CD treatment. A thorough search of electronic databases identified studies investigating upadacitinib's impact on CD patients. Study characteristics, efficacy outcomes (clinical remission and endoscopic response), safety profiles, and mechanistic insights were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using established tools. The synthesis of three studies consistently demonstrated improvements in clinical remission rates and endoscopic outcomes in upadacitinib-treated patients. Adverse events, such as herpes zoster, intestinal perforation, non-melanoma skin cancer, adjudicated cardiovascular events, and anemia, were reported, necessitating vigilant safety monitoring. Upadacitinib emerges as a promising therapeutic option for CD, supported by its observed clinical benefits and mechanistic implications. However, safety concerns underscore the importance of careful patient selection. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussion surrounding personalized treatment approaches for CD, emphasizing the need for further research to confirm its enduring efficacy and safety.

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Upadacitinib, an oral selective-JAK1 inhibitor, has been used in clinical trials to treat atopic dermatitis (AD).

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.

Material and methods

We searched clinical trials from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of upadacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the fixed- or random-effects models to calculate pooled standard mean differences or relative risks (SMD or RR, respectively).

Results

Compared with the placebo group, our meta-analysis revealed that upadacitinib was related to a significant decrease in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. A higher response rate in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and EASI-75 were also detected in the upadacitinib group. Although patients treated with upadacitinib experienced a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), these AEs were mild and tolerated. As for serious adverse events (SAEs), there was no difference between the placebo group and the upadacitinib group.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Further long-term trials are required for confirmation.

The differential effects of upadacitinib treatment on skin rashes of four anatomical sites in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor approved in Japan for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), and it provides a high therapeutic efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the therapeutic effects of upadacitinib on skin rashes of individual anatomical sites, head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk in patients with AD.

METHODS

From August 2021 to December 2022, 65 Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD (aged ≥ 12 years) were treated with oral once daily upadacitinib 15 mg plus twice daily topical corticosteroids of moderate-to-strongest classes.

RESULTS

The eczema area and severity indexes (EASIs) of individual sites decreased significantly at weeks 4, 12, and 24 compared to those at week 0 in parallel to total (whole body) EASI. The achievement rates of EASI 75 at week 24 and of EASI 90 at week 12 of lower limbs were significantly higher than those of trunk. The percent reductions of EASI of lower limbs at weeks 12 and 24 were significantly higher than those of head and neck and of trunk.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the four anatomical sites, the treatment responsiveness to upadacitinib in lower limbs appeared the highest, while those in trunk and in head and neck appeared relatively lower.