Dupilumab in real-life settings: a review of adverse events and their pathogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is a safe and effective biological drug that revolutionized the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Concerning adverse events (AEs), the most commonly reported included ocular involvement, nasopharyngitis, and injection site reactions in clinical trials. Anyway, its use in daily practice is revealing novel dupilumab-induced manifestations.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant English literature (real-life studies, case series, reviews, and meta-analyses) regarding real-life adverse events induced by dupilumab were searched for up to 10 June 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Dupilumab is an effective treatment for AD, showing favorable safety profile since no routine laboratory monitoring is recommended. However, several cutaneous and extracutaneous AEs have been reported in real-life setting expanding the pool emerged from clinical trials. In detail, dupilumab may determine de-novo onset or exacerbation of preexisting conditions, whose pathogenesis is still unclear and seems to involve Th1/Th2 and Th2/Th17 immune-response imbalance. Also, the heterogeneity and the variable onset time of AEs with respect to dupilumab initiation warrant a thorough patients' history collection and strict short- and long-term monitoring. Finally, the most appropriate management of patients with AEs related to dupilumab should take into consideration efficacy for AD as well as severity and nature of the AE, available treatment and patients' preferences.

Biologics for the Management of Erythrodermic Psoriasis: An Updated Review

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a severe and rare variant of psoriasis (less than 3% of cases), characterized by generalized scaling and erythema affecting more than 90% of body surface area. Several systemic symptoms can be present in patients with EP such as lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, fever, fatigue, dehydration, serum electrolyte disturbances, and tachycardia making this condition a possible life-threatening disease, particularly if appropriate treatments are not performed. In this scenario, effective and safe therapies are required. Unfortunately, the rarity of EP makes head-to-head Phase III trials challenging, leading to the lack of established guidelines for its management. Globally, conventional systemic drugs such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, and retinoids often have contraindications linked to patients' comorbidities and have not shown a high profile of efficacy and safety. Recently, the development of biologic drugs including anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and anti-interleukin 12-23, 23, and 17 has revealed favorable results for the management of plaque psoriasis, making them also a possible therapeutic option for EP disease. However, their use in EP is still off-label. The aim of our study was to review current literature on the use of biologic drugs for the treatment of EPs in order to offer a wide perspective on their possible application in EP management.

New Onset and Exacerbation of Psoriasis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Review of the Current Knowledge

COVID-19 vaccination was the main measure to overcome the pandemic. As with other drugs and vaccines, mild to moderate adverse events have been reported following vaccination. In addition, several cutaneous reactions have been described. In particular, there are several reports investigating de novo psoriasis or the exacerbation of psoriasis following COVID-19 vaccination. However, data on the possible pathogenetic mechanisms as well as comprehensive manuscripts on the topic are scant. Thus, the aim of our manuscript was to perform a review of the current literature on post-COVID-19 vaccination exacerbations and new-onset psoriasis in order to offer a wide perspective on this area and to point out possible pathogenetic mechanisms. Research on the current literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines. In total, 49 studies involving 134 patients developing new-onset psoriasis (n = 27, 20.1%) or psoriasis exacerbation (n = 107, 79.9%) were collected. Although cases of de novo psoriasis or a worsening of psoriasis have been reported following vaccination, all of the cases have been successfully treated while overall benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccination does not justify vaccine hesitancy due to the risk of psoriasis being developed or worsening. Certainly, further studies are needed to identify possible pathogenetic mechanisms in order to identify "at-risk" patients. Finally, vaccination should not be discouraged.

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for Dysgeusia During Treatment With Smoothened (SMO) Inhibitors for Basal Cell Carcinomas: The SMO-iD Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

Dysgeusia may occur during conventional or target-therapies and affect patients adherence-to-treatment. Therefore, it should be monitored to improve clinical outcome. To date, available questionnaires on dysgeusia relate to traditional antineoplastics and do not apply to target-therapies as the pathogenetic mechanism and clinical expression differ.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to screen for and monitor the occurrence and severity of dysgeusia in patients under Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors: the SMO-iD questionnaire.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinomas referring dysgeusia under SMO inhibitors at the University Hospital of Naples Federico II, were enrolled between January-December 2020. The PROM was elaborated based on chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia (CiTas) scale (development phase) and then validated by measuring internal consistency and reliability (validation phase).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and interviewed every 8 weeks. In the first phase, 160 CiTas questionnaires were collected, and the SMO-iD questionnaire was developed. In the second phase, 195 SMO-iD questionnaires were recorded, and reliability and validity assessed. Cronbach alpha was 0.89.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMO-iD questionnaire is a validated questionnaire that shows high face and content validity as well as high internal consistency and reliability. Hence, it may be introduced in daily clinical setting to monitor dysgeusia in patients under SMO-inhibitors.

Efficacy and safety of spesolimab for the management of generalized pustular psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare form of psoriasis (less of 1% of cases). Currently, GPP is recognized as a clinical entity, distinguished from plaque psoriasis. However, there are not guidelines for GPP management and treatments are often derived from plaque psoriasis. Therefore, conventional systemic drugs are usually used as first-line treatment options, and biologics are still used off label. Recently, spesolimab, an anti-IL36 receptor humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, has been specifically approved for GPP disease, revolutionizing treatment scenario.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to investigate current literature on the use of spesolimab for GPP management to underline its potential role in GPP and offer a current clinical perspective. Literature research using the Google Scholar, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Skin, and clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed, selecting the most relevant manuscripts.

EXPERT OPINION

Spesolimab is efficacious and has a consistent and favorable safety profile in patients presenting with a GPP flare. However, despite excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy have been reported by both clinical trials and very limited real-life experiences, long-term data, especially in flare-up prevention, are scant. Thus, while the available data are encouraging, further research is warranted to understand the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes associated with spesolimab treatment in GPP.

Use of Biological Therapies for the Management of Pustular Psoriasis: A New Era?

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe and rare form of psoriasis, being a potentially life-threatening condition, characterized by recurring episodes or flares of widespread cutaneous erythema with macroscopic sterile pustules. An irregular innate immune response is linked to GPP, which is considered an auto-inflammatory disorder, while innate and adaptive immunopathogenic responses are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. In consequence, different cytokine cascades have been suggested to be mainly involved in the pathogenesis of each different psoriasis form, with the interleukin (IL)23/IL17 axis implied in plaque psoriasis, and the IL36 pathway in the GPP. As regards GPP treatment, conventional systemic drugs available for plaque psoriasis are usually used as the first-line treatment option. However, contraindications and adverse events often limit the use of these therapies. In this scenario, biologic drugs may represent a promising treatment option. To date, even if 12 different biologics have been approved for plaque psoriasis, none of these is approved for GPP where they are employed off-label. Recently, spesolimab, an anti-IL36 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been recently approved for GPP. The purpose of this article is to assess the current literature about the use of biological therapies for the treatment of GPP to establish the basis for a shared GPP management algorithm.

The Natural Evolution of Nevi with Peripheral Globules

BACKGROUND

Peripheral globules (PG) in melanocytic lesions represent a concerning dermoscopic feature since they might be present in growing nevi and melanomas. Their natural evolution has not been fully elucidated, and an age-based management approach has been recommended.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to calculate the growth rate of lesions with PG and investigate possible association with age, sex, location, and the global dermoscopic pattern.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected the lesions of interest from a cohort of Caucasian patients who underwent sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring. Lesions with PG distributed at 75% or more of their circumference with available follow-up images or histopathologic report were included. The surface area was automatically calculated with the help of an incorporated tool used in the acquisition of the images. The images were also evaluated by independent investigators for the presence of pre-defined criteria. Growth-curve models were used to assess the growth rate. The outcome variable was the area of nevi in mm2, and scatterplots with Lowess curves were used to present the mean change of nevi during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 208 lesions from 98 patients with a median age of 36 years (range 15-75) were included. The median follow-up time was 18 months (range 4-48). The mean growth rate for all nevi was 0.16 mm2/month (95% CI, 0.14-0.18, p < 0.001), ranging from -0.29 to 0.61 mm2/month. The growth rate was higher in nevi with a homogeneous dermoscopic pattern (p < 0.001). The number of peripheral globules during follow-up varied from increasing to complete disappearance. None of the lesions developed any melanoma-specific structure at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Nevi with PG grew at a mean rate of 0.16 mm2/month, and the growth rate was independent of age, gender, or anatomic location. Nevi with homogeneous pattern demonstrated the highest growth rate in our cohort. None of the monitored nevi with PG developed melanoma-specific criteria at follow-up.

The holistic approach to psoriasis patients with comorbidities: the role of investigational drugs

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a high-burden syndrome characterized by cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations that profoundly reduce patients' quality of life. The presence of concomitant comorbidities often represents a limit to the most appropriate psoriasis treatment that will be overcome by the development of drugs effective for diseases with common pathogenetic pathways.

AREAS COVERED

The current review summarizes the latest findings on investigational drugs for psoriasis and their role on potentially concomitant diseases that share similar pathogenetic pathways.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of novel drugs that target key-molecules in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including psoriasis, will impact on the reduction of polypharmacy and drug interaction with increased patients' compliance to treatment, wellbeing and quality of life. Certainly, the efficacy and safety profile of each novel agent must be defined and evaluated in real-life, since the performance may vary according to comorbidities and their severity. Anyway, future is now, and research must continue in this direction.

Acral Melanocytic Nevi in a High-Risk Population: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics and Dermatoscopic Patterns

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of acral nevi and their dermatoscopic patterns have been mainly studied in Asian populations. Few data exist on the prevalence and clinico-dermatoscopic morphology of acral nevi in white populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of acral nevi and evaluate their features in a cohort of Caucasian individuals at high risk for skin cancer.

METHODS

We prospectively examined the palms and soles of 680 high-risk patients who underwent total body clinical and dermatoscopic documentation, as a part of their routine follow-up, between January 2016 and March 2020 at a skin cancer referral center in Greece.

RESULTS

Overall, 334 acral lesions were detected in 217 (37.0%) of 585 patients in the study. The presence of acral nevi was associated with 2.6 higher odds of a total nevus count higher than 50 (OR: 2.6, p < 0.05, confidence intervals [CI]: 1.11-6.09). Of 334 acral nevi, 65.0% were clinically flat and 35.0% were clinically palpable. Palpable lesion had 19-fold higher probability of being located on the sole (OR: 19.44, p < 0.05, CI: 3.91-96.7). The parallel furrow pattern was present in 147 lesions (44.0%). In 76 lesions (22.8%), we observed a previously undefined pattern consisting of wavy lines, which was correlated with clinically palpable lesions (p < 0.001). The third most common pattern was homogeneous (10.5%), followed by the fibrillar (8.7%), the lattice-like (7.2%), the reticular (3.6%), and globular (3.3%).

CONCLUSION

We observed a higher prevalence of benign acral melanocytic lesions than expected, probably related to our cohort selection of patients at high risk for developing skin cancer. Our study confirms the previously described dermatoscopic patterns and provides novel insights into the dermatoscopic morphology of acral palpable nevi, for which we described a new benign pattern consisting of wavy lines.

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part I: focus on pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis management is challenging, especially in pediatric age for different factors. The introduction of biologic drugs and oral small molecules (OSM) revolutionized the armamentarium of available weapons in psoriasis treatment. Despite the use of these drugs in adult patients has been widely investigated, pediatric patients have often been unconsidered in clinical trials and real-life studies. However, the high efficacy and speed of action, the safety profile and the ease-to-use administration make these innovative drugs an invaluable therapeutic opportunity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this manuscript is to perform a review of the current literature examining data on the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs and OSM for the management of psoriasis in pediatric patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review based on currently available evidence suggests biologics and OSM as an ideal treatment option for pediatric patients, with an excellent profile in terms of efficacy and safety as compared to traditional systemic drugs.

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part II: focus on elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis is becoming a frequent concern in geriatric age due to the higher risk to develop treatment adverse events, logistic issues, vulnerability to immune-related diseases and cancer, presence of comorbidities and the risk of drug interactions. In this context, traditional systemic treatments are often contraindicated, and biologic drugs and small molecules seem to be a valuable option. However, data on their effectiveness and safety in elderly patients are scant.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to analyze the current literature in order to point out data on the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs and small molecules for the management of psoriasis in elderly patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review suggests biologics and small molecules as an effective and safe option for the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis in elderly patients.

Drug safety evaluation of tildrakizumab for psoriasis: a review of the current knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that may have an important negative impact on a patient's quality of life. Biological agents deeply changed the management of its moderate-to-severe forms. Interleukin-23 inhibitors represent the latest biologics class approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In particular, tildrakizumab, the latest available anti-interleukin-23 on the Italian market, is a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to evaluate the safety profile of tildrakizumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients. A literature review included articles until July 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Our analysis showed tildrakizumab as a generally safe option for the treatment of psoriasis, with most of the reported adverse events being classified as mild or moderate, and rarely requiring treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, in line with other interleukin-23 inhibitor, no concerns have been raised for tildrakizumab in regard to inflammatory bowel diseases, which represent a significant comorbidity to investigate before starting other biologics (IL-17 inhibitors). However, more real-life long-term data are needed to confirm trial results to further confirm tildrakizumab as a generally safe treatment option for psoriasis.

Treating psoriasis in the elderly: biologics and small molecules

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis prevalence in the elderly is growing. It is estimated that 15% of elderly psoriasis patients suffer from moderate-to-severe disease, thus requiring systemic treatments. However, conventional systemic agents' use is limited due to contraindications and drug-interactions. Conversely, biologics and small molecules seem to be a valuable option, although the geriatric psoriasis population is frequently excluded from trials and shared guidelines are lacking.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant English literature (trials, real-life studies, case series, and reviews) regarding biologics and/or small molecules in the elderly were searched for up to January 17, 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the elderly may be challenging due to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and increased risk of infections and cancers. However, new targeted therapies offer the possibility to perform a tailored-tail management, considering comorbidities, drug-interactions, and frailties which characterize this class of patients. Several real-world data support biologics and small molecules' efficacy and safety in the elderly with mainly no significant difference as compared to young adults. Elderly psoriasis patients' expectations are as high as those of their younger counterparts. Hence, they deserve the best therapeutic options according to their peculiarities for a long-term psoriasis remission and an improved quality of life.

Towards Personalized Medicine in Psoriasis: Current Progress

Although innovative targeted therapies have positively revolutionized psoriasis treatment shifting treatment goals to complete or almost complete skin clearance, primary or secondary lack of efficacy is still possible. Hence, identifying robust biomarkers that reflect the various clinical psoriasis phenotypes would allow stratify patients in subgroups or endotypes, and tailor treatments according to the characteristics of each individual (precision medicine). To sum up the current progress in personalized medicine for psoriasis, we performed a review on the available evidence on biomarkers predictive of response to psoriasis treatments, with focus on phototherapy and systemic agents. Relevant literature published in English was searched for using the following databases from the last five years up to March 20, 2022: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, EBSCO, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library. Currently, more evidence exists towards biologicals, as justified by the huge health care costs as compared to phototherapy or conventional systemic drugs. Among them, most of the studies focused on anti-TNF and IL12/23, with still few on IL17 (mainly secukinumab). The most discussed biomarker gene is the HLA-C*02:06 status that has been shown to be associated with psoriasis, and also differential response to biologicals. Although its positivity is associated with great response to MTX, debatable results were retrieved concerning both anti-TNF and IL12/23 while it seems not to affect secukinumab response. Personalized treatment in psoriasis would provide excellent outcome minimizing the risk of side effects. To date, although several candidates were proposed and assessed, the scarcity and heterogeneity of the results do not allow the identification of the gold-standard biomarker per each treatment. Anyway, the creation of a more comprehensive panel would be more reliable for the treatment decision process.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-TNF Biosimilars for Psoriasis in Pediatric and Geriatric Populations: A 72-Week Real-Life Study

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETA) biosimilars in elderly and children with psoriasis.

Methods

A real-life retrospective observational study was conducted on pediatric (<18 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) psoriasis patients treated with anti-TNF biosimilar agents referring to the Psoriasis Unit of the University of Naples Federico II, Italy, from January 2018 to January 2022. At baseline, demographic characteristics (age and sex), data on psoriasis duration and severity (measured by Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] and body surface area [BSA]), presence of psoriatic arthritis if applicable, comorbidities, and previous psoriasis treatments were recorded. Patients were monitored by regular follow-ups (week 12, 24, 48 and 72) through clinical and haematological assessments and adverse events (AEs) were registered.

Results

A total of 11 children and 23 elderly psoriasis patients were enrolled. Concerning children, 6 (54.5%) were under ADA biosimilar and 5 (45.5%) under ETA biosimilar. ETA and ADA biosimilars were equally effective and safe for up to 72 weeks (mean PASI and BSA < 3). No significant AEs were reported, and none discontinued treatment. In the elderly, 15 (65.2%) were treated with ADA biosimilar and 8 (34.8%) with ETA biosimilar. ETA and ADA biosimilars were equally effective up to 72 weeks (mean PASI < 4 and mean BSA < 5%). AEs (mainly mild) were registered in 9 subjects (39.1%). Also, 4 (17.4%) patients discontinued biologicals for secondary lack of efficacy (3, 75%) or AEs (1, 25%).

Conclusion

Our study found that ADA and ETA biosimilars are effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in children and the elderly. No statistically significant efficacy and safety differences were found between ADA and ETA biosimilars in both children and the elderly. Geriatric patients displayed a higher discontinuation rate and side effects than the pediatric counterpart even if without approaching statistical significance.

Ixekizumab and brodalumab indirect comparison in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from an Italian single-centre retrospective study in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Eleven biologic drugs are currently approved for psoriasis management. Real-life studies are needed to guide clinicians in choosing a tailored-tail therapy. The aim of our retrospective study is to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and brodalumab in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A single-centre real-life retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriatic patients under biologic treatment with ixekizumab or brodalumab. For each patient, clinical and demographic data were collected and the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab and ixekizumab treatment were evaluated at weeks 4, 12 and 24. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) were used for psoriasis severity.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were included in the study: 98(70.5%) and 41(29.5%) patients received ixekizumab and brodalumab, respectively. Mean PASI and BSA significantly reduced at each follow up for both ixekizumab and brodalumab groups. Even if ixekizumab reached higher rates of PASI90 and PASI100 than brodalumab (PASI90: 43.8%vs39.0% PASI100: 20.4%vs17.1% at week4 and PASI90: 83.6%vs75.6% PASI100: 71.5%vs60.9% at week24), these results were not statistically significant. Adverse events, mainly mild, were registered in 25.5% of ixekizumab and 26.8% of brodalumab group, respectively. Discontinuation rate was higher for brodalumab (17.1%vs9.1%), without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety for ixekizumab and brodalumab.

Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review of the Current Knowledge

Bimekizumab, a novel humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that neutralizes both IL-17A and IL-17F, was recently approved the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. Bimekizumab represents the latest anti IL-17 treatment available for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy profiles were evaluated in four Phase III clinical trials, which evaluated bimekizumab versus placebo and ustekinumab (BE VIVID), versus placebo (BE READY), versus adalimumab (BE SURE), and versus secukinumab (BE RADIANT). Overall, bimekizumab displayed promising results in terms of both efficacy and safety, allowing reach PASI90 and PASI100 in short time (as early as week 4) and maintain it in the long term (52 weeks), with acceptable safety profile. Also, bimekizumab showed a rapid onset of response and a higher efficacy when compared to adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab, with comparable safety profile. Herein, we carried out a comprehensive literature review of the available literature data about bimekizumab in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Risankizumab treatment in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a 52-week real-life study

Recent knowledge on the key role of interleukin (IL) 23/17 axis in psoriasis pathogenesis, led to development of new biologic drugs. Risankizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody specifically targeting IL23. Its efficacy and safety were showed by both clinical trials and real‐life experiences. However, real‐life data on effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in patients who previously failed anti‐IL17 are scant. To assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients who previously failed anti‐IL17. A 52‐week real‐life retrospective study was performed to assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients who previously failed anti‐IL17. A total of 39 patients (26 male, 66.7%; mean age 50.5 ± 13.7 years) were enrolled. A statistically significant reduction of psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA) was assessed at each follow‐up (PASI at baseline vs. week 52: 13.7 ± 5.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001; BSA 21.9 ± 14.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.0001). Nail psoriasis severity index improved as well, being statistically significative only at week 16 and thereafter [9.3 ± 4.7 at baseline, 4.1 ± 2.4 (p < 0.01) at week 16, 1.4 ± 0.8 (p < 0.0001) at week 52]. Treatment was discontinued for primary and secondary inefficacy in 1(2.6%) and 3(7.7%) patients, respectively. No cases of serious adverse events were assessed. Our real‐life study confirmed the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, suggesting it as a valuable therapeutic weapon among the armamentarium of biologics, also in psoriasis patients who previously failed anti‐IL17 treatments.

Guselkumab is efficacious and safe in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a 52-week real-life study

BACKGROUND

Interleukin (IL)23/Th17 axis is the leading actor of psoriasis pathogenesis. Guselkumab is the first anti-IL23 approved for psoriasis. Anti-IL23 and anti-IL17 partially share their therapeutic target currently appearing as the most efficacious available psoriasis treatments. Real-life data on guselkumab performance in anti-IL17 failure patients are scant.

METHODS

A 52-week real-life single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients who previously failed anti-IL17.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were enrolled (28 male, 63.6%; mean age 59.0 ± 10.2years). A statistically significant improvement of Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) was assessed at each follow-up (PASI decreased from 13.9 ± 8.1 to 0.9 ± 0.7 at week52 while BSA from 24.3 ± 19.6 to 1.3 ± 1.4, p < 0.001). Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) improvement was collected as well, even if being statistically significative only at week28 and thereafter [2.9 ± 6.2 at baseline, 0.9 ± 1.5 at week28, (p < 0.05)]. Only 3(6.8%) patients discontinued guselkumab due to secondary inefficacy. No cases of serious Adverse Events were assessed.

CONCLUSION

Our real-life study confirmed the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in daily clinical practice suggesting it as a valuable weapon also in psoriasis patients who previously failed anti-IL17 treatments.

Anti-interleukin-23 for psoriasis in elderly patients: guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab in real-world practice

Background

Elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) represent an increasing proportion of patients with psoriasis and 15% of these have moderate to severe disease. Biologics are being used frequently in this group of patients even though safety and efficacy data are limited. In addition, owing to anti‐interleukin (IL)‐23 therapies being a relatively recent option, no data have been reported about their use in elderly patients with psoriasis.

Aim

To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab in real‐world practice in elderly patients.

Methods

This was a single‐centre retrospective study that enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, treated with guselkumab, risankizumab or tildrakizumab. The length of the study for each group depended on the drug (44 weeks for risankisumab, 40 weeks for guselkumab and 28 weeks for tildrakizumab, owing to its more recent availability in Italy).

Results

In total, 34 patients were enrolled (n = 20 on guselkumab; n = 8 on risankizumab; n = 6 on tildrakizumab). At Week 4, 29.4% reached 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) and 8.8% reached 100% improvement in PASI (PASI100); at Week 28, PASI90 and PASI100 was reached by 58.8% and 29.4%, respectively. At the final follow‐up (Week 40 or 44, depending on drug), data were available only for the risankizumab (Week 40) and guselkumab (Week 44) and groups, and showed that 71.4% of patients had reached PASI90 and 53.5% had reached PASI100. Four patients (11.7%) discontinued treatment. No significant differences were found between the three groups. The limitations of the study included its retrospective nature of the study, small sample size, and different numbers of patients and follow‐up duration for the different groups (highest for guselkumab, lowest for tildrakizumab).

Conclusion

The three anti‐IL‐23 therapies assessed are promising, safe and effective options in elderly patients, and there was no significant difference between them. However, more data are needed to confirm our results and to understand their role in the management of this group of patients.

Topical oil formulation of plant extracts and vitamins as effective treatment for stretch marks and xerosis-An observational longitudinal study

Background

Stretch marks are linear scars that result from elastic fiber destruction. They usually occur as the consequence of rapid change in the body mass (weight gain and loss, pregnancy, weightlifting), long‐term steroid use, or endocrinopathies. Treatment is challenging and mainly based on topical and procedural therapies, although the standard of care is still under debate.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a topical oil formulation of plant extracts and vitamins on the aesthetic improvement of stretch marks and xerosis.

Materials and methods

Fifty male and female patients, aged between 14 and 45 years, with stretch marks referring at the University Hospital Federico II, Naples, were enrolled between March and November 2019. Topical application of plant extracts and vitamin‐rich oil was performed twice daily on affected skin for 4 months. Patients were monitored at baseline (T0), and at two‐month (T1) and 4‐month (T2) follow‐ups, through clinical and dermoscopic assessment, confocal microscopy, cutaneous ultrasound, MoistureMeterEpiD, and X‐Rite spectrocolorimeter. Primary endpoints were as follows: 70% clinical improvement of stretch marks and 3‐point decrease in clinical score from baseline to T2. Secondary endpoints were as follows: change in the T0 parallel pattern of collagen fibers at confocal microscopy, cutaneous thickness increase at ultrasounds, cutaneous hydration increase at MoistureMeterEpiD, erythema reduction at X‐Rite spectrocolorimeter, and safety and adverse events (AEs).

Results

At 4‐month follow‐up, stretch marks improved objectively and subjectively in all patients (p < 0.001). In detail, there was a 29% and 71% improvement in clinical appearance of stretch marks at T1 and T2, respectively, as documented dermoscopically and by the 3‐point reduction in the assessor's mean clinical score at each follow‐up visits [from 8.1±0.7 at baseline to 5.7±1.0 at T1 and 2.3 ±0.5 at T2 (p < 0.001)]. Erythema decreased by 15% and 30% and in parallel hydration increased by 25% and 71%, at T1 and T2, respectively (p < 0.001). At T2 confocal microscopy of stretch marks, dermal collagenous fibers assumed casual disposition with reticular pattern and refractivity, as signs of collagen remodeling and neocollagenesis, and also the T2 cutaneous ultrasound revealed increased epidermal thickness and decreased dermal hypoechogenicity as for a higher skin hydration.

Conclusion

Our study showed that a topical oil formulation rich in plant extracts and vitamins appears to be effective and safe in treating stretch marks and xerosis.

Risankizumab in real life: preliminary results of efficacy and safety in psoriasis during a 16-week period

No data on real-life experiences of risankizumab efficacy and safety are reported, apart from two isolated case reports. We carried out a single-centre, prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab. Fourteen patients were included (mean age 44.5 ± 14.2 years). Mean PASI decreased from 12.3 ± 5.2 (baseline) to 4.4 ± 2.7 at week 4 (p < 0.01), and to 2.7 ± 1.7 at week 16 (p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for BSA. In patients previously treated with biologics (71.4%, n = 10) versus the naïve ones, mean baseline PASI was similar (12.7 ± 5.8 vs 11.3 ± 3.8). Mean BSA was higher in multifailure (23.5 ± 11.8 vs 15.5 ± 11.8). At 4 and 16 weeks, a significant improvement in PASI and BSA was observed in both groups. An improvement in NAPSI score, mean scalp, and palmo-plantar area reduction was noticed during follow-up. No AEs were reported up to week 16 and few and mild grade laboratory tests were reported. Our initial data confirm the promising results on efficacy and safety of Risankizumab, even in a more challenging and "real" population, composed of a high percentage of multi-failure psoriatic patients who have benefitted from a new class agent.

Therapeutic update of biologics and small molecules for scalp psoriasis: a systematic review

Scalp psoriasis represents the most common difficult-to-treat area in psoriasis patients. Its presence is linked to severe discomfort and impairment of quality of life given the associated symptoms (most of all, scaling and pruritus) and the location in a highly visible area, thus a prompt treatment is required. Its management may be challenging as the scalp is quite sensitive to long-term treatment with topical corticosteroids and usually resistant to topical and systemic agents. Likely, the currently available therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with biologicals and small molecules that revolutionized psoriasis treatment and that of scalp psoriasis. Nevertheless, the lack of international dedicated guidelines pushed us to perform a comprehensive review on the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis with the aim to put the basis for a therapeutic algorithm. After reviewing all the available evidence on the short-term and long-term efficacy of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis the use of the newest biologics (anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23) seems to be linked to the highest clinical performances in controlling scalp psoriasis. However, head-to-head comparisons between different biologics or biologics and small molecules are lacking. Hence, treatment selection should always be individualized.

Adalimumab in the Management of Isotretinoin-Induced Acne Fulminans: Report of a Case

Acne fulminans (AF) is a rare, acute, and severe form of acne vulgaris often associated with systemic symptoms. Its treatment is challenging and controversial. We report a case of isotretinoin-induced AF (IIAF) in a 12-year-old boy resistant to traditional therapies (oral steroids and isotretinoin). The patient was successfully treated with adalimumab that can be considered an effective off-label option in the treatment of resistant IIAF in children.