Quality of Life and Screening on Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Depression, Anxiety in Septorhinoplasty

Normative Values of Rhinology Questionnaires in Young Adults: A Tool to Identify Candidates for Rhinoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Normative values of Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17) allow the monitoring of surgery outcomes. The objective of our study was to determine the reference norms of these disease-specific questionnaires in the age group that most often seeks rhinoplasty.

METHODS

The normative values of the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires were calculated for 570 (459 women and 111 men) young adults at the mean age of 19.3 ± 1.3 years, range 18-25 years. Each participant underwent an ENT examination. All those who obtained a positive result were asked to complete two questionnaires: ROE and FROI-17.

RESULTS

The mean total ROE score was 13.4 ± 2.3, with a median of 13 and a range from 7 to 24. The mean overall FROI-17 score was 9.1 ± 13.3, with a median of 4 and a range from 4 to 72. For nasal symptoms, the mean was 4.0 ± 6.0, with a median of 1 and a range from 0 to 29. We observed a statistically significant difference between men and women only for the normative values of nasal symptoms (mean 4.0 ± 5.9 and median 2 (0-27) vs. mean 3.7 ± 6.5 and median 0 (0-29)). Additionally, there was a statistically significant correlation between the normative values of the ROE and FROI-17 scores (ρs = -0.413 for all participants, ρs = -0.314 for women, and ρs = -0.437 for men).

CONCLUSIONS

The established normative values for the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires among young, healthy individuals without nasal abnormalities can assist in the initial assessment of individuals seeking rhinoplasty. Deviations from these normative values in the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires results may serve as indicators of potential concerns, such as body dysmorphic disorder (BDD).

Impact of Psychiatric Symptoms on Nasal Perception in Septorhinoplasty Patients

Psychological assessment plays a crucial role in the preoperative phase of septorhinoplasty (SRPL), exerting potential influence on both pre- and postoperative aspects of quality of life (QoL). In this prospective study, SRPL patients were systematically screened using two validated questionnaires for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) and one each for anxiety, depression, and somatic symptom disorder (SSD). Nasal perception was evaluated utilizing two disease-specific, self-report instruments: The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) and the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory-17 (FROI-17). A total of 95 patients were enrolled. Positive screening rates were 40.4 and 28.3% for BDD, 37.3% for elevated anxiety, 16.4% for depression, and 22.4% for SSD. Mean scores on the ROE and FROI indicated lower QoL in all positive screening groups. Statistically significant differences were observed for anxiety (FROI total score: 47.1 ± 14.6 to 37.8 ± 16.2; p = 0.021) and BDD (ROE: 43.7 ± 15.7 to 32.5 ± 15.5; p = 0.003 and FROI total score: 47.4 ± 15.3 to 37.8 ± 17.1; p = 0.014). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale exhibited a significant correlation with the preoperative FROI score (r = 0.34, p = 0.005). Patients with positive screenings for depression, anxiety, BDD, and SSD demonstrated compromised QoL during preoperative assessments compared with their negative counterparts, reflecting diminished nasal perception in both esthetic and functional dimensions. Surgeons must be cognizant of these psychological aspects during preoperative evaluations.

Self-image, self-esteem, anxiety, and functional capacity in patients undergoing open-structure rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty may improve negative psychological aspects, such as mild to moderate body dysmorphic disorder; however, the repercussions on the self-image and quality of life of patients after the procedure are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate self-image, self-esteem, anxiety, and functional capacity of patients undergoing open-structure rhinoplasty.

METHODS

A primary, analytical, clinical, longitudinal, and prospective study was conducted, which included 30 female patients, aged between 18 and 50 years with elongated nose and nasal hump, who underwent open and structured rhinoplasty. All procedures were performed by a team from the Rhinology DCP/Unifesp. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - EPM, BDSS, BDD-YBOCS, SF-36, SRQ-20, and STAI (T/E) questionnaires were administered before the surgery and at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The results showed statistically significant differences in the Rosenberg scale - EPM (p = 0.017), BDSS (p < 0.001), BDD (p = 0.006), SF-36 (p = 0.041), SRQ-20 (p = 0.012), and STAI-T (p = 0.001) scores in general analyses. Additionally, the statistically significant changes persisted in various stratified postoperative periods. In the qualitative analysis, there was only statistical significance for the classification of the BDSS score, where the "Absent" (absence of body dysmorphism) index increased from 70.0% in the preoperative state to 96.7% in 18 months postoperatively. The "Present" (presence of body dysmorphism) index fell from 30.0% to 3.3% in the same period (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Open-structure rhinoplasty improved the patients' self-image, self-esteem, anxiety, and mental health.

Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) presents significant challenges in aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery, impacting patient outcomes and well-being. Understanding its prevalence and associated factors is crucial for effective patient care. (2) Methods: A systematic review of national and international databases on body dysmorphic disorder, plastic surgery, cosmetic surgery, reconstructive surgery, and prevalence yielded 999 studies between 1878 and April 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting prevalence while excluding those with small sample sizes (<20 participants), unclear diagnostic criteria for BDD, and non-English accessibility. (3) Results: A meta-analysis using a random effects model was conducted on 65 studies involving 17,107 patients to estimate the prevalence of BDD. The overall estimated prevalence of BDD was 18.6%; 10,776 (62.9%) were females, with a mean age of 35.5 ± 11.7 years. Subgroup meta-analysis found significant variability in effect sizes across countries and types of specialty, of which Brazil showed the highest proportion and dermatology exhibited the smallest. Meta-regression analysis found no significant relationship between the year of publication and prevalence rates. (4) Conclusions: Our findings update the current literature on BDD prevalence in aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. We emphasize the importance of proactive screening and multidisciplinary care approaches to address the complex challenges posed by patients with BDD. Further research is needed to explore evolving trends in BDD prevalence and factors influencing its expression across different cultural contexts.