Photodynamic therapy of the canine peritoneum: normal tissue response to intraperitoneal and intravenous photofrin followed by 630 nm light

Photoimmunotherapy of Ovarian Cancer: A Unique Niche in the Management of Advanced Disease

Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths in the United States, with five-year survival rates of 15-20% for stage III cancers and 5% for stage IV cancers. The standard of care for advanced OvCa involves surgical debulking of disseminated disease in the peritoneum followed by chemotherapy. Despite advances in treatment efficacy, the prognosis for advanced stage OvCa patients remains poor and the emergence of chemoresistant disease localized to the peritoneum is the primary cause of death. Therefore, a complementary modality that is agnostic to typical chemo- and radio-resistance mechanisms is urgently needed. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a photochemistry-based process, is an ideal complement to standard treatments for residual disease. The confinement of the disease in the peritoneal cavity makes it amenable for regionally localized treatment with PDT. PDT involves photochemical generation of cytotoxic reactive molecular species (RMS) by non-toxic photosensitizers (PSs) following exposure to non-harmful visible light, leading to localized cell death. However, due to the complex topology of sensitive organs in the peritoneum, diffuse intra-abdominal PDT induces dose-limiting toxicities due to non-selective accumulation of PSs in both healthy and diseased tissue. In an effort to achieve selective damage to tumorous nodules, targeted PS formulations have shown promise to make PDT a feasible treatment modality in this setting. This targeted strategy involves chemical conjugation of PSs to antibodies, referred to as photoimmunoconjugates (PICs), to target OvCa specific molecular markers leading to enhanced therapeutic outcomes while reducing off-target toxicity. In light of promising results of pilot clinical studies and recent preclinical advances, this review provides the rationale and methodologies for PIC-based PDT, or photo-immunotherapy (PIT), in the context of OvCa management.

Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review

Background

The aim of this review was to analyze preclinical studies and clinical trials evaluating photodynamic therapy (PDT), and photothermal therapy (PTT) in peritoneal metastasis (PM) treatment.

Content

Systematic review according PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches using PubMed and Clinical Trials.

Summary

A total of 19 preclinical studies analyzing PDT in PM treatment were included. Each new generations of photosensitizers (PS) permitted to improve tumoral targeting. Phase III preclinical studies showed an important tumoral biodistribution (ratio 9.6 vs normal tissue) and significant survival advantage (35.5 vs 52.5 days for cytoreductive surgery vs cytoreductive surgery+PDT, p<0.005). Height clinical trials showed important side effects (capillary leak syndrome and bowel perforation), mainly explained by low tumor-selectivity of the PS used (first generation mainly).

Peritoneal mesothelioma apparition with carbon nanotubes first limited the development of PTT. But gold nanoparticles, with a good tolerance, permitted a limitation of tumoral growth (reduction of bioluminescence to 37 % 20 days after PTT), and survival benefit (35, 32, and 26 days for PTT with cisplatine, PTT alone and laser alone, respectively).

Outlook

Recent improvement in tumor-selectivity and light delivery systems is promising but further development would be necessary before PDT and PTT routinely applied for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy for an ovarian cancer ascite model in Fischer 344 rat using hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether

With limited treatment options, intraperitoneal spread of ovarian cancer is a common problem leading to high morbidity. Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy combined with debulking surgery to treat residual disease is an alternative choice for clinicians. Hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME) is a promising second-generation photosensitizer developed in China. Our study was designed to investigate the phototoxicity of HMME on ovarian cancer. NuTu-19, a cell line derived from adenocarcinoma of Fischer 344 rat, and its allogeneic graft ascites tumor model was used in this study. HMME was confirmed to be localized in cytolysosome, and HMME-based photosensitization induced direct necrosis as well as mitochondria damage. The photocytotoxicity of HMME was both light- and drug dose-dependent and no significant dark cytotoxicity was observed in NuTu-19 cells. With the ascite tumor-bearing Fischer 344 rat model, HMME-based intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy was proved to be useful in improving the prognosis of ovarian cancer. Thus, this study provides evidence that HMME-based photodynamic therapy is an effective adjuvant therapy for ovarian cancer.

Synergism of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted immunotherapy with photodynamic treatment of ovarian cancer in vivo

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer often develops resistance to standard treatments, which is a major reason for the high mortality associated with the disease. We examined the efficacy of a treatment regimen that combines immunotherapy to block the activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), overexpression of which is associated with the development of resistant ovarian cancer, and photodynamic therapy (PDT), a mechanistically distinct photochemistry-based modality that is effective against chemo- and radioresistant ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We tested a combination regimen consisting of C225, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR, and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid A (BPD)-based PDT in a mouse model of human ovarian cancer. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in acute treatment response and survival studies that used 9-19 mice per group. Analysis of variance and Wilcoxon statistics were used to analyze the data. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Mice treated with PDT + C225 had the lowest mean tumor burden compared with that in the no-treatment control mice (mean percent tumor burden = 9.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3% to 17.3%, P < .001). Mean percent tumor burden for mice treated with C225 only or PDT only was 66.6% (95% CI = 58.7% to 74.4%, P < .001) and 38.2% (95% CI = 29.3% to 47.0%, P < .001), respectively. When compared with PDT only or C225 only, PDT + C225 produced synergistic reductions in mean tumor burden (P < .001, analysis of variance) and improvements in survival (P = .0269, Wilcoxon test). Median survival was approximately threefold greater for mice in the PDT + C225 group than for mice in the no-treatment control group (80 days versus 28 days), and more mice in the PDT + C225 group were alive at 180 days (3/9; 33% [95% CI = 7% to 70%]) than mice in the C225-only (0/12; 0% [95% CI = 0% to 22%]) or PDT-only (1/10; 10% [95% CI = 0.2% to 44%]) groups.

CONCLUSION

A mechanistically nonoverlapping combination modality consisting of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition with C225 and BPD-PDT is well tolerated, effective, and synergistic in mice.

Phase II trial of debulking surgery and photodynamic therapy for disseminated intraperitoneal tumors

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines photosensitizer drug, oxygen, and laser light to kill tumor cells on surfaces. This is the initial report of our phase II trial, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical debulking and PDT in carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were enrolled between April 1997 and January 2000. Patients were given Photofrin (2.5 mg/kg) intravenously 2 days before tumor-debulking surgery. Laser light was delivered to all peritoneal surfaces. Patients were followed with CT scans and laparoscopy to evaluate responses to treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were adequately debulked at surgery; these comprise the treatment group. There were 14 GI malignancies, 12 ovarian cancers and 15 sarcomas. Actuarial median survival was 21 months. Median time to recurrence was 3 months (range, 1-21 months). The most common serious toxicities were anemia (38%), liver function test (LFT) abnormalities (26%), and gastrointestinal toxicities (19%), and one patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

Photofrin PDT for carcinomatosis has been successfully administered to 42 patients, with acceptable toxicity. The median survival of 21 months exceeds our expectations; however, the relative contribution of surgical resection versus PDT is unknown. Deficiencies in photosensitizer delivery, tissue oxygenation, or laser light distribution leading to recurrences may be addressed through the future use of new photosensitizers.

Minimally-invasive debulking of ovarian cancer in the rat pelvis by means of photodynamic therapy using the pegylated photosensitizer PEG-m-THPC

Interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) using the pegylated photosensitizer PEG-m-THPC was evaluated as a minimally-invasive procedure to selectively debulk unrespectable pelvic ovarian cancer (NuTu-19) in immunocompetent rats. To assess tumour selectivity, PEG-m-THPC at dosages of 0.3, 3.0 and 30 mg kg(-1) body weight was administered intravenously to 30 rats 4 weeks following tumour induction. Eight days later laser light at 652 nm and optical doses ranging from 100 to 900 J cm(-1) diffuser-length was delivered by an interstitial cylindrical diffusing fibre inserted blindly into the pelvis. Three days following light application, the volume of necrosis was measured and the damage to pelvic organs was assessed histologically on cross sections. For analysis of survival, 20 tumour-bearing rats received PDT using drug doses of 3 or 9 mg kg(-1) body weight and an optical dose of 900 J cm(-1) diffuser-length, whereas ten untreated tumour-bearing rats served as controls. The histological assessment of PDT induced necrosis showed a non-linear dose-response for both the photosensitizer dose and the optical dose. The lowest drug dose activated with the highest optical dose did not induce more necrosis than seen in tumour-bearing control animals. The same optical dose induced necrosis of 17 mm in diameter using 30 mg kg(-1) and 11 mm using 3 mg kg(-1) photosensitizer. The optical threshold for induction of significant necrosis was between 100 and 300 J cm(-1) diffuser-length for 30 mg kg(-1) and between 300 and 500 J cm(-1) for 3 mg kg(-1) PEG-m-THPC. Significant damage to normal pelvic organs was only seen if 30 mg kg(-1) photosensitizer was activated with optical doses of 700 J cm(-1) or more. In the survival study, all treated animals survived PDT for at least 2 weeks and the intestinal and urinary tract remained functional. No clinical signs of blood vessel or nerve injury were observed. Mean overall survival of untreated tumour-bearing rats was 25.0 +/- 4.5 days compared to 38.4 +/- 3.8 days and 40.0 +/- 3.6 days for rats treated with 3 mg kg(-1) or 9 mg kg(-1) PEG-m-THPC mediated PDT respectively (P < 0.05). We conclude that PEG-m-THPC mediated PDT has a favourable therapeutic window and that this minimally-invasive procedure can reduce pelvic cancer bulks effectively and selectively.

Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy of the rat CC531 adenocarcinoma

The goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) of a single tumour growing intraperitoneally. For this purpose the CC531 colon carcinoma, implanted in an intraperitoneal fat pad of Wag/RijA rats, was treated with intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy (IPPDT) using Photofrin as the photosensitiser. Two illumination techniques have been compared. An invasive illumination technique using Perspex blocks to illuminate 30 cm2 of the lower abdomen gave a significant delay in tumour growth with 25 J cm-2 applied 1 day after Photofrin. A minimally invasive illumination technique using a balloon catheter to illuminate 14 cm2 resulted in an equivalent growth delay with 75 J cm-2. The route of administration of the photosensitiser did not influence regrowth times of the tumour. Mitomycin C (MMC), a bioreductive agent, was used to exploit the known PDT-induced hypoxia. The combination of IPPDT with MMC resulted in an increased tumoricidal effect. In conclusion, IPPDT led to a significant growth delay for a single tumour implanted intraperitoneally and repetition of the PDT treatment was possible using a minimally invasive illumination technique. Repeated treatments resulted in increased tumour response.

Evaluating the role of photodynamic therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cancer of the pancreas constitutes one of the major causes of cancer related death throughout the world. A 5-year survival rate of only 2% and a maximum of 20 months median survival in multi modality treatment studies dealing with the most favorable patients only, has been demonstrated. This review analyzes the principal treatments and available experimental data in view of a clinical application of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

On the basis of published results, we examined the palliation of pancreatic cancer by chemotherapy alone; radiation alone and multimodality schedules (radiation and chemotherapy). Radical tumor resection was examined as attempted curative treatment.

RESULTS

In reported therapeutic procedures, palliative or potentially curative, median survival was below 2 years. The GTSG reported survival time increases from 10.9 to 21.0 months when surgery is followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. This combination postoperatively does not increase mortality, but adds 30% morbidity. Photodynamic therapy has been demonstrated in preclinical studies to have a selective effect on malignant versus the normal pancreas.

CONCLUSION

PDT is highly effective in eliciting the destruction of experimental pancreatic tumors with the lack of significant effect on the normal pancreas. The poor prognosis for patients with this disease, especially those patients with advanced disease, warrants closer examination of PDT for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy in the rat: comparison of toxicity profiles for photofrin and MTHPC

Toxicity studies for intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy (IPPDT) were performed in Wag/RijA rats, using specially designed light delivery blocks for proper light distribution and light dosimetry. A recently developed photosensitizer mesotetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC), excited at 652-nm wave-length, was compared with Photofrin (630 nm). Toxicity profiles for various sensitizer doses, light fluences and time intervals were investigated. A light fluence of 15 J.cm-2 delivered to the entire peritoneum 24 hr after 5 mg Photofrin per kg i.v. induced reversible impairment of intestinal, liver and kidney function. A dose of 0.2 mg mTHPC per kg i.v. followed by 6 J.cm-2 at 72 hr appeared to be equitoxic to the intestines; however, functional tests revealed little effect for this mTHPC-mediated IPPDT regime on liver or kidney. Histology demonstrated focal irreversible damage to the kidneys for both photosensitizers, not reflected in functional impairment. Light doses of 25 to 30 J.cm-2 at 24 hr after Photofrin or 8-12 J.cm-2, 72 hr after mTHPC caused lethal toxicity in the first 2 weeks due to intestinal damage. Higher light doses caused a shock syndrome and rhabdomyolysis resulting in death within 20 hr for both photosensitizers. In conclusion, maximum tolerable schedules for whole-abdomen IPPDT were defined for Photofrin and mTHPC. Both photosensitizers caused similar toxicity profiles depending on drug dose, light fluence and time interval.

Intrathoracic photodynamic therapy: a canine normal tissue tolerance study and early clinical experience

Surgery with intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT) has the potential to improve the treatment of pleural malignancies. Before embarking on such treatment in humans, however, thoracic tissue tolerance to PDT was studied. For each of three (1 week, 1 month, and 6 month) study end-points, one control (no Photofrin II [PII]) and four treated animals underwent thoracotomy 72 hours after I.V. injection (6 mg/kg) PII. Red light (630 nm) was delivered (5-40 J/cm2) to the pleural surface (1 cm diameter) of selected thoracic organs. No clinical differences were observed between PDT and control dogs. The control showed no histological changes; however, in the treated animals focal areas of coagulation necrosis were found at 1 week which progressed to fibrosis at 1 month. The extent and depth of injury was proportional to light dose. The lung was the most sensitive; the chest wall was the most resistant. Myocardium had superficial damage, whereas coronary arteries appeared normal. The results provide the basis for proceeding to phase I human trials in the evaluation of PDT as an intraoperative adjuvant treatment in the management of pleural malignancies.

Phase I study of debulking surgery and photodynamic therapy for disseminated intraperitoneal tumors

PURPOSE

Phase I study designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT) at laparotomy/debulking surgery in patients with refractory or recurrent, disseminated intraperitoneal tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients received dihematoporphyrin ethers (DHE) 1.5-2.5 mg/kg by i.v. injection prior to surgery. Patients resected to < or = 5 mm of residual disease underwent laser light delivery to all peritoneal surfaces.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients entered the study. Thirty-nine underwent resection and light delivery/PDT. PDT dose was escalated by increasing DHE from 1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg, shortening the interval between DHE injection and surgery from 72 to 48 hr, and increasing the light dose. Initially, 630 nm red light alone was used. In this group, PDT of 2.8-3.0 J/cm2 induced small bowel edema and resulted in 3 small bowel perforations after bowel resection or enterotomy. Further light dose escalation, however, was achieved by switching to less penetrating 514 nm green light to the bowel/mesentery. In later patients, whole peritoneal PDT was supplemented with boost doses of 10-15 J/cm2 red light or 5-7.5 J/cm2 green light to high risk areas. Small bowel complications were not seen after switching to less penetrating green light. Dose limiting toxicities occurred in 2 of 3 patients at the highest light dose of 5.0 J/cm2 green light with boost. These patients had pleural effusions that required thoracentesis and postoperative respiratory support for 7-9 days, while one had a gastric perforation. At potential follow-up times of 3.8-43.1 months (median 22.1 months), 30/39 patients are alive and 9/39 are free of disease.

CONCLUSION

The maximum tolerated dose of intraoperative PDT following debulking surgery performed 48 hr after intravenous administration 2.5 mg/kg DHE is 3.75 J/cm2 of 514 nm green light to the entire peritoneal surface with boosts to 5.0-7.5 J/cm2 of 514 nm green light or 10-15 J/cm2 of 630 nm red light to sites of gross disease encountered at surgery.

Tolerance of small bowel anastomoses in rabbits to photodynamic therapy with dihematoporphyrin ethers and 630 nm red light

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is being evaluated in experimental clinical trials in patients with peritoneal malignancies. Some patients require partial small bowel resection with re-anastomosis prior to PDT because of bulky tumor or focal involvement of the small bowel by tumor. To assess the safety of PDT in this setting, the tolerance of small bowel anastomoses in New Zealand white rabbits to PDT with dihematoporphyrin ethers (DHE) and 630 nm light was studied. With conventional DHE doses of 1.5-2.5 mg/kg given 24 hours prior to surgery and light doses of 0-20 J/cm2 of 630 nm light, no adverse effects were seen on the healing of small bowel anastomoses. Higher photosensitizer doses of 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg in conjunction with 20 J/cm2, however, induced failure and breakdown of fresh anastomoses in 2/3 and 4/4 animals, respectively.