Toxicity of photodynamic therapy with photofrin in the normal rat brain

Carrier-Free, Amorphous Verteporfin Nanodrug for Enhanced Photodynamic Cancer Therapy and Brain Drug Delivery

Glioblastoma (GBM) is hard to treat due to cellular invasion into functioning brain tissues, limited drug delivery, and evolved treatment resistance. Recurrence is nearly universal even after surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves photosensitizer administration followed by light activation to generate reactive oxygen species at tumor sites, thereby killing cells or inducing biological changes. PDT can ablate unresectable GBM and sensitize tumors to chemotherapy. Verteporfin (VP) is a promising photosensitizer that relies on liposomal carriers for clinical use. While lipids increase VP's solubility, they also reduce intracellular photosensitizer accumulation. Here, a pure-drug nanoformulation of VP, termed "NanoVP", eliminating the need for lipids, excipients, or stabilizers is reported. NanoVP has a tunable size (65-150 nm) and 1500-fold higher photosensitizer loading capacity than liposomal VP. NanoVP shows a 2-fold increase in photosensitizer uptake and superior PDT efficacy in GBM cells compared to liposomal VP. In mouse models, NanoVP-PDT improved tumor control and extended animal survival, outperforming liposomal VP and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Moreover, low-dose NanoVP-PDT can safely open the blood-brain barrier, increasing drug accumulation in rat brains by 5.5-fold compared to 5-ALA. NanoVP is a new photosensitizer formulation that has the potential to facilitate PDT for the treatment of GBM.

Subcutaneous Xenograft Models for Studying PDT In Vivo

The most facile, reproducible, and robust in vivo models for evaluating the anticancer efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) are subcutaneous xenograft models of human tumors. The accessibility and practicality of light irradiation protocols for treating subcutaneous xenograft models also increase their value as relatively rapid tools to expedite the testing of novel photosensitizers, respective formulations, and treatment regimens for PDT. This chapter summarizes the methods used in the literature to prepare various types of subcutaneous xenograft models of human cancers and syngeneic models to explore the role of PDT in immuno-oncology. This chapter also summarizes the PDT treatment protocols tested on the subcutaneous models, and the procedures used to evaluate the efficacy at the molecular, macromolecular, and host organism levels.

Sinoporphyrin sodium, a novel sensitizer for photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy

Sinoporphyrin sodium (DVDMS) is a novel sensitizer discovered by Professor Fang Qi-Cheng and widely used in photodynamic (PDT) and sonodynamic therapy (SDT). We searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, etc. for system review of its progress. We found that, both DVDMS-PDT and -SDT had been proven effective for inhibiting tumor growth and mechanisms involved reactive oxygen species, autophagy, and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways. Material advances enhanced antitumor effects and expanded its application. The safety of DVDMS in animals was evaluated, and metabolic parameters were uncovered. Additionally, DVDMS-PDT also exhibited therapeutic effects on non-neoplastic diseases like psoriasis and bacterial infections. Two phase I clinical trials of DVDMS have been documented, but recruitments had still not been completed. In conclusion, DVDMS is a promising sensitizer for both PDT and SDT; however, there are some shortcomings in previous studies like inconsistent treatment parameters, which need systematic assessments in future. Moreover, more mechanisms such as the role of autophagy need to be discovered. Further evidence of the safety and effectiveness of new materials are needed, and the application in non-neoplastic diseases like actinic keratosis and fungal infection deserves further development. Above all, promoting its clinical applications is the most important goal.

Physical energy for drug delivery; poration, concentration and activation

Techniques for controlling the rate and duration of drug delivery, while targeting specific locations of the body for treatment, to deliver the cargo (drugs or DNA) to particular parts of the body by what are becoming called "smart drug carriers" have gained increased attention during recent years. Using such smart carriers, researchers have also been investigating a number of physical energy forces including: magnetic fields, ultrasound, electric fields, temperature gradients, photoactivation or photorelease mechanisms, and mechanical forces to enhance drug delivery within the targeted cells or tissues and also to activate the drugs using a similar or a different type of external trigger. This review aims to cover a number of such physical energy modalities. Various advanced techniques such as magnetoporation, electroporation, iontophoresis, sonoporation/mechnoporation, phonophoresis, optoporation and thermoporation will be covered in the review. Special emphasis will be placed on photodynamic therapy owing to the experience of the authors' laboratory in this area, but other types of drug cargo and DNA vectors will also be covered. Photothermal therapy and theranostics will also be discussed.

Photodynamic therapy of brain tumours: evaluation of porphyrin uptake versus clinical outcome

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the level of the photosensitizer haematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) uptake measured in tissue samples taken from brain tumour patients was associated with survival post-treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT). The mean HpD uptake in tumour tissue was significantly higher in glioblastoma multiforme than anaplastic astrocytoma. Recurrent tumours had a higher mean uptake compared to primary tumours, which was evident in all grades of tumour. Among patients with GBM, there was a significant association between greater HpD uptake and survival (HR = 0.26 [0.12, 0.59], p = 0.001). There was also some evidence of a weak association between greater HpD uptake and survival among patients with AA, although the result was inconclusive (HR = 0.73 [0.32, 1.71], p = 0.472).

Photoirradiation therapy of experimental malignant glioma with 5-aminolevulinic acid

OBJECT

Accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) in malignant gliomas is induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Because PPIX is a potent photosensitizer, the authors sought to discover whether its accumulation might be exploited for use in photoirradiation therapy of experimental brain tumors, without injuring normal or edematous brain.

METHODS

Thirty rats underwent craniotomy and were randomized to the following groups: 1) photoirradiation of cortex (200 J/cm2, 635-nm argon-dye laser); 2) photoirradiation of cortex (200 J/cm2) 6 hours after intravenous administration of 5-ALA (100 mg/kg body weight); 3) cortical cold injury for edema induction; 4) cortical cold injury with simultaneous administration of 5-ALA (100 mg/kg body weight) and photoirradiation of cortex (200 J/cm2) 6 hours later; or 5) irradiation of cortex (200 J/cm2) 6 hours after intravenous administration of Photofrin II (5 mg/kg body weight). Tumors were induced by cortical inoculation of C6 cells and 9 days later, magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained. On Day 10, animals were given 5-ALA (100 mg/kg body weight) and their brains were irradiated (100 J/cm2) 3 or 6 hours later. Seventy-two hours after irradiation, the brains were removed for histological examination. Irradiation of brains after administration of 5-ALA resulted in superficial cortical damage, the effects of which were not different from those of the irradiation alone. Induction of cold injury in combination with 5-ALA and irradiation slightly increased the depth of damage. In the group that received irradiation after intravenous administration of Photofrin II the depth of damage inflicted was significantly greater. The extent of damage in response to 5-ALA and irradiation in brains harboring C6 tumors corresponded to the extent of tumor determined from pretreatment MR images.

CONCLUSIONS

Photoirradiation therapy in combination with 5-ALA appears to damage experimental brain tumors selectively, with negligible damage to normal or perifocal edematous tissue.

Optimal light dose for interstitial photodynamic therapy in treatment for malignant brain tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The primary goal was to determine the maximal tolerable light dose that can be administered to patients undergoing multifiber interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) of malignant brain tumors at a fixed dose of photosensitizer.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients (12 glioblastomas, 5 anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 malignant ependymoma) were included in this study. The total light dose delivered to the tumor was divided into three groups of six patients each: 1,500-3,700 J, 3,700-4,400 J, and 4,400-5,900 J.

RESULTS

Five patients (all glioblastomas) demonstrated postoperative permanent neurologic deficits. None of the patients in 1,500-3,700 J, two patients in 3,700-4,400 J, and three patients in 4,400-5,900 J had neurologic deficits. Glioblastomas recurred more often than anaplastic astrocytomas. Increasing the light dose did not make a difference in local/regional control of glioblastomas. Patients with anaplastic astrocytomas survived (mean, 493 days) longer than patients with glioblastomas (mean, 116.5 days) after PDT. Four patients had prolonged survival (more than a year) after PDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the total light dose delivered to the tumor increases the odds of having a permanent neurologic deficit but does not increase survival or time to tumor progression. There was no difference in local or marginal recurrence with increasing light dose. Recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas tend to do better than recurrent glioblastomas with PDT.

Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts

The photosensitizing properties of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) and polyethylene glycol-derivatized mTHPC (pegylated mTHPC) were compared in nude mice bearing human malignant mesothelioma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma xenografts. Laser light (20 J/cm2) at 652 nm was delivered to the tumour (surface irradiance) and to an equal-sized area of the hind leg of the animals after i.p. administration of 0.1 mg/kg body weight mTHPC and an equimolar dose of pegylated mTHPC, respectively. The extent of tumour necrosis and normal tissue injury was assessed by histology. Both mTHPC and pegylated mTHPC catalyse photosensitized necrosis in mesothelioma xenografts at drug-light intervals of 1-4 days. The onset of action of pegylated mTHPC seemed slower but significantly exceeds that of mTHPC by days 3 and 4 with the greatest difference being noted at day 4. Pegylated mTHPC also induced significantly larger photonecrosis than mTHPC in squamous cell xenografts but not in adenocarcinoma at day 4, where mTHPC showed greatest activity. The degree of necrosis induced by pegylated mTHPC was the same for all three xenografts. mTHPC led to necrosis of skin and underlying muscle at a drug-light interval of 1 day but minor histological changes only at drug-light intervals from 2-4 days. In contrast, pegylated mTHPC did not result in histologically detectable changes in normal tissues under the same treatment conditions at any drug-light interval assessed. In this study, pegylated mTHPC had advantages as a photosensitizer compared to mTHPC. Tissue concentrations of mTHPC and pegylated mTHPC were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in non-irradiated animals 4 days after administration. There was no significant difference in tumour uptake between the two sensitizers in mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma xenografts. Tissue concentration measurements were of limited use for predicting photosensitization in this model.

Photodynamic therapy of intracranial tissues: a preclinical comparative study of four different photosensitizers

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of four different photosensitizers for intracranial photodynamic therapy (PDT) of normal brain tissues and an intracranial tumor was investigated in rabbits, using the photodynamic threshold model.

SUMMARY

PDT is currently being investigated as an adjuvant treatment to surgical resection and/or radio chemotherapy of intracranial neoplasms. While possible neurotoxic side effects of the treatment have been noted, only limited preclinical data quantifying the response of intracranial normal and tumor tissues following PDT are available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The photodynamic threshold dose values for the four photosensitizers, Photofrin, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), Tin Ethyl Etiopurpurin (SnET2), and chloroaluminum phthalocyanine (AlClPc), were determined using measured light fluence distributions, photosensitizer concentration in tissue, and histologically-determined extent of necrosis following PDT. These measurements were made in normal rabbit brain and in an intracranially-implanted carcinoma (VX2).

RESULTS

For Photofrin, AlClPc, and SnET2 (in an emulsion delivery vehicle) normal grey and white matter were very sensitive to PDT, showing a significantly lower threshold dose value than VX2-tumor. For ALA-induced PpIX and SnET2 (in liposome) very little or no white matter damage was observed. Additionally, ALA-PpIX showed significantly lower concentration in white matter than in cortex and tumor. Normal brain structures lacking a blood-brain barrier showed high uptake of all photosensitizers and, hence, are at risk of collateral damage during PDT.

CONCLUSIONS

For clinical PDT of most adult intracranial neoplasms ALA-induced PpIX appears to be promising, and SnET2 (liposomal) has potential for selective tumor destruction with relative sparing of white matter. Other normal brain structures and, for the other photosensitizers, also white matter are at risk of collateral damage, if exposed to light during PDT.

Photodynamic effects induced by meso-tetrakis[4-(carboxymethyleneoxy)phenyl]porphyrin using rat hepatic microsomes as model membranes

Porphyrins, in combination with light, offer an alternate approach to the treatment of cancer, in the form of photodynamic therapy (PDT). With a view to locate new porphyrins for use in PDT, we evaluated the ability of a novel water-soluble porphyrin, meso-tetrakis[4-(carboxymethyleneoxy)phenyl]porphyrin (T4CPP) to induce photodamage in membranes, using rat hepatic microsomes as a model system. Hepatic microsomes treated with T4CPP and exposed to visible light showed significant lipid peroxidation, as assessed by the formation of conjugated dienes, lipid hydroperoxides, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances. The peroxidation induced was both time- and concentration-dependent. T4CPP plus light also resulted in the destruction of the microsomal enzymes adenosine triphosphatase and glucose-6-phosphatase. Analysis of the products of peroxidation and selective inhibition by specific inhibitors showed that the oxidative damage induced was mainly due to singlet oxygen and partly due to hydroxyl radical. The porphyrin T4CPP was efficiently labeled with 99mTc. When this 99mTc-labeled porphyrin was injected into a mammary-tumor-bearing rat, it accumulated in the tumor. Our studies suggest that T4CPP, due to its potential to localize in tumors and to induce membrane damage as exemplified by alteration in rat liver microsomes, may have possible applications in this new modality of cancer treatment.

Photodynamic therapy in neurosurgery: a review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been investigated extensively, both experimentally and clinically, as an adjunctive treatment in the neuro-oncological field. It is based on the more selective accumulation of a photosensitizer in malignant than normal tissue with low systemic toxicity. Subsequent light activation induces photo-oxidation, followed by selective tumour destruction via vascular and direct cellular mechanisms. Malignant brain tumours carry a lethal prognosis with a median survival of 15 months despite surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. PDT is therefore a logical therapeutic concept for brain tumours infiltrating into normal brain. In this review, all the available data on patients treated with haematoporphyrin derivative-mediated PDT are critically analysed. Over 310 patients have been reported in the literature suffering from primary or recurrent malignant brain tumours which were treated with PDT following tumour resection in open clinical phase I/II trials. This number includes 58 patients treated at our own institution. Variations in the treatment protocols make evaluation scientifically difficult; however, there is a clear trend of increased median survival after surgical resection and one single photodynamic treatment. PDT is generally well tolerated and side effects consist of moderate increased intracranial pressure and prolonged skin sensitivity to direct sunlight. The current available data indicate that PDT is a safe treatment, which is well tolerated by the patients and yields an improvement in survival of those with malignant brain tumours. Conclusive information can be expected from controlled clinical trials which are currently being designed. The results raise the hope that PDT will be a valuable addition to the armamentarium for the treatment of cerebral malignancies.

Photodynamic therapy of human glioma (U87) in the nude rat

We measured the response of normal brain and the human U87 glioma implanted in the brain of rats (n = 65) to photodynamic therapy (PDT) using Photofrin as the sensitizer. Normal brain and U87 tumor implanted within brain of athymic (nude) rats were subjected to PDT (12.5 mg/kg of Photofrin) at increasing optical energy doses (35 J/cm2, 140 J/cm2, 280 J/cm2) of 632 nm light. Photofrin concentration in tumor, brain adjacent to tumor and normal brain were measured in a separate population of rats. Twenty-four hours after PDT, the brains were removed, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and the volumes of the PDT-induced lesion measured. Photofrin concentration in tumor greatly exceeded that of normal brain and brain adjacent to tumor (> 20x). Both normal brain and U87 tumor exhibited superficial tissue damage with PDT at 35 J/cm2. However, both normal and tumor-implanted brain exhibited tissue damage with increasing optical dose. A heterogeneous pattern of pannecrosis along with a uniform volume of pannecrosis was detected in the tumor. In contrast, normal brain exhibited a uniform sharply demarcated volume of necrosis. Our data indicate that the U87 human brain tumor model and the normal brain in the athymic rat are sensitive to PDT and Photofrin with an optical dose-dependent response to treatment.

Damage threshold of normal rat brain in photodynamic therapy

Normal brain tissue response to photodynamic therapy (PDT) must be quantified in order to implement PDT as a treatment of brain neoplasm. We therefore calculated the threshold for PDT-induced tissue necrosis in normal brain using Photofrin (porfimer sodium, Quadralogic Technologies Inc., Vancouver, BC) as the photosensitizer. The absolute light fluence-rate distribution for superficial irradiation and effective attenuation depth were measured in vivo using an invasive optical probe. Photosensitizer uptake in cerebral cortex was measured with chemical extraction and fluorometric analysis. Photodynamic therapy-induced lesion depths at various drug dose levels were measured as a biological end point. The PDT threshold for normal brain necrosis was calculated as in the magnitude of 10(16) photons/cm3. Thus normal rat brain is extremely vulnerable to PDT damage. This suggests that extra precautions must be exercised when PDT is used in brain.

The sensitivity of normal brain and intracranially implanted VX2 tumour to interstitial photodynamic therapy

The applicability and limitations of a photodynamic threshold model, used to describe quantitatively the in vivo response of tissues to photodynamic therapy, are currently being investigated in a variety of normal and malignant tumour tissues. The model states that tissue necrosis occurs when the number of photons absorbed by the photosensitiser per unit tissue volume exceeds a threshold. New Zealand White rabbits were sensitised with porphyrin-based photosensitisers. Normal brain or intracranially implanted VX2 tumours were illuminated via an optical fibre placed into the tissue at craniotomy. The light fluence distribution in the tissue was measured by multiple interstitial optical fibre detectors. The tissue concentration of the photosensitiser was determined post mortem by absorption spectroscopy. The derived photodynamic threshold values for normal brain are significantly lower than for VX2 tumour for all photosensitisers examined. Neuronal damage is evident beyond the zone of frank necrosis. For Photofrin the threshold decreases with time delay between photosensitiser administration and light treatment. No significant difference in threshold is found between Photofrin and haematoporphyrin derivative. The threshold in normal brain (grey matter) is lowest for sensitisation by 5 delta-aminolaevulinic acid. The results confirm the very high sensitivity of normal brain to porphyrin photodynamic therapy and show the importance of in situ light fluence monitoring during photodynamic irradiation.

Lasers in neurosurgery

Lasers have been used in neurosurgery for the past 25 years, undergoing modifications to suit the specific needs of this medical discipline. The present report reviews the current use of lasers in neurosurgical practice and examines the pros and cons of lasers in specific neurosurgical applications. In spite of their advantages, laser use is still not widespread in neurosurgery. One reason is the continued lack of complete control over real-time laser interactions with neural tissue. A greater acceptance and use of lasers by neurosurgeons will depend upon automated control over defined specific parameters for laser applications based upon the type of tissue, the desired effect on tissue, and application to the clinical situation without loss of precision and a lot of expense. This will require the integration of newer lasers, computers, robotics, stereotaxy, and concepts of minimally invasive surgery into the routine management of neurosurgical problems.