Severe alcoholic relapse after liver transplantation: What consequences on the graft? A study based on liver biopsies analysis

Substance Use Disorders and Interprofessional Management in the Pre and Post Liver Transplant Settings

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are rising in the general population and also in the transplant population. Alcohol use disorder leading to alcohol-associated liver disease is the most common of all SUDs in the liver transplantation setting. Uncontrolled SUDs and relapse after transplant can lead to graft loss and mortality, as well as reduce quality of life and patient functioning. SUDs can be treated effectively through integrated, interprofessional management by addiction and medical/surgical professional members of the transplant team. Teams should be aware of pitfalls in interprofessional teamwork and communication so that corrective steps could be implemented for improved efficiency.

Perioperative Outcomes of Limited Sobriety Versus Standard Sobriety Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Disease

Alcohol-associated liver disease is now the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States in the context of liver transplantation for patients with less than 6 months of abstinence from alcohol. To determine whether patients with less than 6 months of sobriety have worse perioperative outcomes than those with standard sobriety requirements, we performed a retrospective cohort study, comparing limited and standard sobriety patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation from May 2018 to October 2022 at a single academic tertiary transplant center. The limited sobriety cohort comprised adult patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to alcohol use disorder who presented with their first episode of hepatic decompensation, with less than 6 months of sobriety. This group was compared with a standard sobriety cohort, consisting of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease with more than 6 months of sobriety. A total of 169 patients were selected for analysis, with 58 in the limited sobriety group and 111 in the standard sobriety group. The limited- sobriety group was younger (median 42 years vs 54 years; P < .01) and had more severe liver disease than the standard sobriety group (median Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 39 vs 34; P < .01) at the time of transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the 2 groups. Despite having more severe liver disease, the limited sobriety management pathway was not associated with worse perioperative outcomes than the standard sobriety pathway. Our findings indicate liver transplantation in patients with limited sobriety do not require increased perioperative resources.

Safety of acamprosate for alcohol use disorder after liver transplant: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Acamprosate is a therapy for alcohol use disorder, but data on feasibility and safety in recipients of liver transplants are lacking. This was a single-center unblinded prospective pilot randomized controlled trial of adults (≥18 y) with liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease enrolled between 2021 and 2023, who were randomized 2:1 to the intervention of acamprosate (666 mg dose 3 times daily) or standard of care (SOC) over 14 weeks. Outcomes included safety (prevalence of adverse events [AEs]), feasibility (weekly survey response rate >60%), adherence (self-reported acamprosate use >60%), and efficacy (reduction in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale), and relapse-blood phosphatidylethanol (≥20 ng/mL/reported alcohol use) evaluated by standardized weekly surveys. The efficacy analysis was done in both the intention-to-treat (excluding withdrawals before medication administration) and per-protocol population (excluding withdrawals/<4 weeks participation). Of 78 participants who were approached, 30 enrolled (19 acamprosate and 11 SOC) with similar baseline characteristics. Eight participants withdrew (6 acamprosate before medication administration and 2 SOC). AEs were similar between acamprosate and SOC groups (92.3% vs. 90.0%, p > 0.99), including grade 3 AEs (53.9% vs. 60.0%, p > 0.99) with no reported grade 4/5 AEs. Survey response rates were similar in acamprosate versus SOC groups (61.0% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.19), and 69.0% were acamprosate adherents. Baseline Penn Alcohol Craving Scale values were low with no difference by the group in median absolute change in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale for intention-to-treat (0, IQR: -4 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: 0-0, p = 0.32), and per-protocol analyses (-1, IQR: -6 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: -0 to 0, p = 0.36). There was no reported or biochemical evidence of alcohol relapse. In this pilot study, preliminary data suggest that acamprosate may be safe and feasible. These data can inform larger studies and clinician efforts to address alcohol use disorder in post-liver transplant care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT06471686).

Outcomes for Early Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Disease in High-acuity Liver Transplant Recipients With Alcohol Use Disorder

Background

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) incidence is increasing, and alcohol-associated liver disease is the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. Many centers have adopted "early LT" (ELT) for patients with <6 mo of abstinence. This study evaluates whether ELT outcomes in acutely ill recipients are equivalent to standard LT (SLT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed LTs for alcohol-associated liver disease in patients with AUD at a single center between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were categorized as ELT (<6 mo) or SLT (≥6 mo). Alcohol relapse was categorized as "abstinent," "slip," or "harmful," with use defined by phosphatidylethanol or self-reported consumption. Outcomes were post-LT relapse, graft, and patient survival.

Results

Of 183 patients (ELT: 99 [54.1%]; SLT: 84 [45.9%]), ELT recipients were younger, had higher model for end-stage liver disease scores, shorter waitlist times, and were more frequently in intensive care unit pre-LT. Multivariable analysis showed no association in time to post-LT relapse, graft, or patient survival. Intensive care unit status was associated with lower relapse risk (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.43; P < 0.001), whereas higher education levels were associated with higher risk (hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.49; P = 0.014).

Conclusions

Pre-LT alcohol abstinence duration does not significantly impact post-LT relapse or survival. ELT should be considered for acutely ill patients with AUD.

Women and People From Deprived Areas Are Less Likely to be Assessed for Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-related Liver Disease: Results From a National Study of Transplant Assessments

Background

Alcohol-related liver disease (ArLD) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in Europe and the United States. Few studies have examined the characteristics of patients with ArLD formally assessed for liver transplants.

Methods

We collected prospective data on every patient with ArLD formally assessed for liver transplantation in the United Kingdom during a 12-mo period.

Results

Five hundred forty-nine patients with ArLD were assessed for liver transplantation. The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 and the UK MELD score was 54. 24% were women. The median duration of abstinence was 12 mo. Listing outcomes were 59% listed, 4% deferred, and 37% not listed. The reasons for not listing were medical comorbidities (29%), too early for transplantation (20%), potential recoverability (18%), recent alcohol use (12%), and other (21%). Patients listed for transplant had a higher median MELD (16 versus 13; P < 0.001) and UK MELD scores (55 versus 53; P < 0.001), longer duration of abstinence (median 12 versus 10 mo; P = 0.026), and no differences in sex (P = 0.258), age distribution (P = 0.53), or deprivation deciles compared with those not listed. Comparing patients assessed for transplantation to national data on deaths from ArLD revealed a lower proportion of female patients (24% assessed versus 36% deaths; P < 0.001) and patients from areas of high deprivation (assessments: deaths, most deprived decile 1:20 versus least deprived decile 1:9).

Conclusions

This study provides the first complete national profile of evaluations for liver transplantation for patients with ArLD. Women and patients from the most deprived deciles of the population may be relatively underrepresented.

Liver Transplantation in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease: Current Status and Future Landscape

Alcohol-associated liver disease is a well-validated indication for liver transplantation and recent data have refined the patterns of alcohol consumption and their impact on the pre-LT and post-LT periods. The selection process is a multidisciplinary approach that integrates liver and addiction parameters. The present review analyzes the drivers of outcome and alcohol relapse and focuses on the changing paradigm in terms of access to the waiting list.

Recurrence of Primary Disease After Adult Liver Transplant - Risk Factors, Early Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention

Liver transplantation offers a new lease of life to patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the implantation of an exogenous allograft and the accompanying immunosuppression bring their own challenges. Moreover, the persistence of risk factors for the initial liver insult place the new graft at a higher risk of damage. With the increasing number of liver transplants along with the improvement in survival posttransplant, the recurrence of primary disease in liver grafts has become more common. Pre-2015, the most common disease to recur after transplant was hepatitis C. However, directly acting antivirals have nearly eliminated this problem. The greatest challenge of disease recurrence we now face are those of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. We focus on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of the recurrence of primary disease after transplant. We also discuss means of early identification, risk stratification, prevention, and management of recurrent primary disease after liver transplantation.

Management of alcohol-associated liver disease and alcohol use disorder in liver transplant candidates and recipients: Challenges and opportunities

Alcohol-associated liver disease poses a significant global health burden, with rising alcohol consumption and prevalence of alcohol use disorder (AUD) contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. This review examines the challenges and opportunities in the care of candidates and recipients of liver transplant (LT) with AUD. Despite advancements in posttransplant patient survival, the risk of disease recurrence and alcohol relapse remains substantial. Several challenges have been identified, including (1) rising disease burden of alcohol-associated liver disease, variable transplant practices, and systemic barriers; (2) disparities in mental health therapy access and the impact on transplant; (3) variable definitions, underdiagnosis, and stigma affecting access to care; and (4) post-LT relapse, its risk factors, and consequential harm. The review focuses on the opportunities to improve AUD care for candidates and recipients of LT through effective biochemical monitoring, behavioral and pharmacologic approaches, creating Centers of Excellence for post-LT AUD care, advocating for policy reforms, and ensuring insurance coverage for necessary services as essential steps toward improving patient outcomes. The review also highlights unmet needs, such as the scarcity of addiction specialists, and calls for further research on personalized behavioral treatments, digital health, and value-based care models to optimize AUD care in the LT setting.

Workup and management of liver transplantation in alcohol-related liver disease

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) represents the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Outcomes of LT for ALD are comparable with those of LT for other etiologies; however, ALD is still considered a controversial indication for LT, mainly because it is considered a self-inflicted disease with a high risk of return to alcohol use after LT. Pre-LT evaluation criteria have changed over time, with a progressive re-evaluation of the required pre-transplant duration of abstinence. Despite the fact that some transplant programs still require 6 months of abstinence in order to consider a patient suitable for LT, there is increasing evidence that a pre-transplant abstinence period of <6 months can be considered for well-selected patients. Early LT for severe alcohol-related hepatitis that has not responded to medical therapy has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option with high survival benefit when performed within strict and well-recognized criteria. However, high variability in LT access exists for these patients due to the presence of social and medical stigma. A psycho-social assessment, together with an evaluation by an addiction specialist, should be mandatory in patients with ALD who are potential candidates for LT in order to assess the risk of post-transplant return to alcohol use and to ensure good long-term outcomes. Finally, before LT, attention should be paid to the presence of other potential comorbidities (i.e., cardiovascular and neurological diseases), which could represent a potential contraindication to LT. Similarly, after LT, patients should be adequately monitored for the development of cardiovascular events and screened for "de novo" tumors, although standardized protocols for this monitoring do not exist at this time.

Dual alcohol and metabolic-related liver disease: Results from a population of liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

If alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are now the two main indications for liver transplantation (LT), it has been recognized that both conditions can coexist in varying degrees and the concept of dual-aetiology fatty liver disease (DAFLD) has been proposed. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate, in a cohort of patients transplanted for ALD and NAFLD, the prevalence of DAFLD before LT and the impact on liver graft outcome.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2010, all patients who underwent LT for the so-called ALD or NAFLD in our centre were included. Before LT, DAFLD was defined as patients with a history of excessive alcohol consumption and obesity associated with either diabetes or hypertension. Before LT, patients were separated into three groups: DAFLD, ALD, and NAFLD. Fatty liver graft disease was classified according to the FLIP algorithm.

RESULTS

Out of 907, adult LT recipients were identified: 33 DAFLD patients, 333 ALD patients, and 24 NAFLD patients. After LT, ALD patients experienced significantly more alcohol relapse than DAFLD patients, who had twice more post-LT metabolic syndrome. Out of 926, post-LT biopsies, DAFLD patients had significantly more fatty liver graft disease due to metabolic syndrome features than ALD patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results support that DAFLD recently emerged as an indication of LT. In the future, this particular population needs to be identified as a specific entity since post-LT outcome on the graft is different from ALD and more similar to NAFLD patients.

Concept and risk factors of alcohol relapse in liver transplant recipients with alcohol-related aetiologies: A scoping review

Alcohol relapse in those who received liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-related liver disease can lead to poor graft function, low medication adherence rates and decreased chances of survival. Numerous studies have evaluated on this topic; however, discrepancies in the meaning and measurement of 'alcohol relapse' lead to heterogeneous results. This scoping review aimed to explore the conceptual and operational definitions of alcohol relapse in LT recipients with alcohol-related aetiologies and to examine newly reported risk factors of alcohol relapse. Following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review method and PRISMA guidelines, structured searches for articles published from 2012 to 2022 were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO. Twenty-eight studies were included in the final review. Alcohol relapse was either defined as 'any alcohol consumption' or 'a certain degree of alcohol drinking' after transplantation. Discrepancies in the incidence rates persisted even within studies that shared the same conceptual definition. Commonly reported risk factors for alcohol relapse were younger age, social isolation and shorter abstinence periods before LT. Self-efficacy and post-transplant complications were newly identified risk factors in recent studies; whereas environmental factors such as external stressors were rarely included. The variance in the definition of alcohol relapse and inconsistent identification methods make it difficult to organize a structured interventional study. A standardized stratification of post-LT alcohol relapse behaviour is needed to prior to implementing interventions that employ a harm minimization approach. Cost-effective interventions promoting self-efficacy could enable the prevention and management of alcohol relapse after LT.

Protocolized screening and detection of occult alcohol use before and after liver transplant: Lessons learned from a quality improvement initiative

INTRODUCTION

Detection of alcohol (ETOH) use with biomarkers provides an opportunity to intervene and treat patients with alcohol use disorder before and after liver transplant (LT). We describe our center's experience using urine ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and serum phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in alcohol screening protocols.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective review of patients presenting for LT evaluation, patients waitlisted for LT for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), and patients who received a LT for ALD over a 12-month period, from October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. Patients were followed from waitlisting to LT, or for up to 12 months post-LT. We monitored protocol adherence to screening for ETOH use- defined as completion of all possible tests over the follow-up period- at the initial LT visit, while on the LT waitlist and after LT.

RESULTS

During the study period, 227 patients were evaluated for LT (median age 57 years, 58% male, 78% white, 54.2% ALD). Thirty-one patients with ALD were placed on the waitlist, and 38 patients underwent LT for ALD during this time period. Protocolized adherence to screening for alcohol use was higher for PEth for all LT evaluation patients (191 [84.1%] vs. 146 [67%] eligible patients, p < .001), in patients with ALD waitlisted for LT (22 [71%] vs. 14 (48%] eligible patients, p = .04) and after LT for ALD, 20 (33 [86.8%] vs. 20 [52.6%] eligible patients, p < .01). Few patients with a positive test in any group completed chemical dependency treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

When screening for ETOH use in pre- and post-LT patients, protocol adherence is higher using PEth compared to EtG. While protocolized biomarker screening can detect recurrent ETOH use in this population, engagement of patients into chemical dependency treatment remains challenging.

Alcohol use disorder in community management of chronic liver diseases

Rising rates of alcohol use disorder (AUD) combined with increases in alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and other liver disease have resulted in the need to develop alcohol management strategies at all levels of patient care. For those with pre-existing liver disease, whether ALD or others, attention to alcohol use treatment and abstinence becomes critical to avoiding worsening liver-related consequences. Modalities to help patients reduce or stop alcohol include screening/brief intervention/referral to treatment, various therapeutic modalities including cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational enhancement therapy and 12-step facilitation, and alcohol relapse prevention medications. Harm reduction approaches versus total abstinence may be considered, but for those with existing ALD, particularly advanced ALD (cirrhosis or acute alcoholic hepatitis), total abstinence from alcohol is the recommendation, given clear data that ongoing alcohol use worsens mortality and liver-related morbidity. For certain populations, alcohol cessation is even more critically important. For those with hepatitis C or NAFLD, alcohol use accelerates negative liver-related outcomes. In women, alcohol use accelerates liver damage and results in worsened liver-related mortality. Efforts to integrate AUD and liver disease care are urgently needed and can occur at several levels, with establishment of multidisciplinary ALD clinics for fully integrated co-management as an important goal.

Liver Transplantation in Alcohol-related Liver Disease and Alcohol-related Hepatitis

Alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) remains one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease and the prevalence of alcohol-related cirrhosis is still increasing worldwide. Thus, ARLD is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide especially after the arrival of direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection. Despite the risk of alcohol relapse, the outcomes of LT for ARLD are as good as for other indications such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with 1-, 5-, and 10- year survival rates of 85%, 74%, and 59%, respectively. Despite these good results, certain questions concerning LT for ARLD remain unanswered, in particular because of persistent organ shortages. As a result, too many transplantation centers continue to require 6 months of abstinence from alcohol for patients with ARLD before LT to reduce the risk of alcohol relapse even though compelling data show the poor prognostic value of this criterion. A recent pilot study even observed a lower alcohol relapse rate in patients receiving LT after less than 6 months of abstinence as long as addictological follow-up is reinforced. Thus, the question should not be whether LT should be offered to patients with ARLD but how to select patients who will benefit from this treatment.

Positive blood phosphatidylethanol concentration is associated with unfavorable waitlist-related outcomes for patients medically appropriate for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Excessive alcohol use is a leading etiology of liver disease and indication for liver transplantation. Accurate measurement of alcohol use remains a challenge in the management of patients in the pre-, peri-, and post-liver transplant settings. Blood 16:0-18:1 phosphatidylethanol (PEth) concentration is a sensitive and specific biomarker of binge and moderate, chronic alcohol use. As PEth has the longest detection window of available blood-based direct alcohol biomarkers for moderate to heavy drinking, it shows promise as an indicator of patterns and chronicity of drinking. However, the utility of PEth in clinical liver transplantation is understudied. This study examines the association of PEth results with liver transplantation waitlist-focused patient outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective data for all patients tested for PEth for a one-year period at a tertiary care medical center with an active liver transplantation program were abstracted. Indications for PEth testing, liver transplantation waitlist-related outcomes (e.g., listing and delisting) following testing and associations of PEth results with other parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Over a one-year period, 153 PEth tests were performed on 109 individuals. The most frequent indications for PEth testing were as an objective indicator of alcohol use patterns (86.3%) and to assess alcohol as a putative etiology of liver injury (13.7%). Of the 109 patients, 56 were medically appropriate for liver transplantation. Medically acceptable candidates with unfavorable transplantation waitlist-related outcomes (delisting, deferment of transplant evaluation, deferment of listing until completion of recommended alcohol rehabilitation, and being deemed not a transplant candidate) were at least 3.41 times more likely to have a positive PEth test than those with favorable transplantation waitlist-related outcomes (odds ratio 3.41, confidence interval 3.41 to ∞, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This single-center study reporting a comprehensive account of PEth utilization at a liver transplant center demonstrates that liver transplantation waitlist-related outcomes are associated with PEth test results. Patients with positive PEth tests were more likely to have unfavorable transplant waitlist-related outcomes. PEth testing has not been validated as a predictor of relapse to drinking in post-transplant patients and because its utility in the pre-transplant setting is unclear its use could lead to disparities in the selection of patients for liver transplantation.

Poor Outcomes after Recidivism in Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

Recidivism in patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is shown to be associated with poor survival in some studies.

METHODS

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients for ALD with at least 2 years of follow-up and history of significant alcohol relapse were included. The recipients underwent LDLT from June 2010 to December 2016, and data were analyzed until June 2019. The cohort had a median follow-up of 54 (33-78 IQR) months. Recidivism (significant alcohol intake) was defined as >21 units per week.

RESULTS

A total of 27 of 463 (5.8%) LDLT recipients (all men), aged 43.5 ± 9.6 years, had significant alcohol intake. A liver biopsy was performed on demand in 14 patients (in the presence of raised levels of liver enzymes or jaundice). The histological diagnoses in these patients were as follows: alcoholic hepatitis in 7 (50%), alcoholic hepatitis and acute cellular rejection or chronic rejection in 4 (28.5%), cirrhosis in 2 (14.2%), and acute cellular rejection and cirrhosis in 1 (7.1%) patient. Four of 5 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of acute or chronic rejection were noncompliant with immunosuppression. Six of these patients died. The mortality after 1 year of transplant was significantly more in patients with recidivism.

CONCLUSION

Recidivism was associated with significant morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation.

Management of alcohol use disorder in patients with cirrhosis in the setting of liver transplantation

The prevalence of alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been steadily increasing over the past decade. In parallel, alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has been increasing at an alarming rate, especially among young patients. Data suggest that most patients with ALD do not receive AUD therapy. Although liver transplantation is the only curative therapy for end-stage ALD, transplant candidacy is often a matter of debate given concerns about patients being under-treated for AUD and fears of post-transplantation relapse affecting the allograft. In this Review, we discuss diagnosis, predictors and effects of relapse, behavioural therapies and pharmacotherapies, and we also propose an integrative, multidisciplinary and multimodality approach for treating AUD in patients with cirrhosis, especially in the setting of liver transplantation. Notably, this approach takes into account the utility of AUD pharmacotherapy in patients on immunosuppressive medications and those with renal impairment after liver transplantation. We also propose a comprehensive and objective definition of relapse utilizing contemporary biomarkers to guide future clinical trials. Future research using the proposed approach and definition is warranted with the goal of optimizing AUD treatment in patients with cirrhosis, the transplant selection process and post-transplantation care of patients with AUD.

Factors Having an Impact on Relapse and Survival in Transplant Recipients With Alcohol-Induced Liver Disease

Objective

To assess the impact of standardized pretransplant alcohol abstinence and treatment guidelines on liver transplant outcomes.

Methods

This study assessed the posttransplant relapse and survival associated with a pretransplant guideline mandating alcohol abstinence, addiction treatment, and Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) attendance. This retrospective cohort study included liver recipients with alcohol-induced liver disease transplanted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, at a Midwest transplant center. Cox regression models tested for associations between pretransplant treatment, demographic and clinical characteristics, and outcome measures.

Results

Of 236 liver recipients (188 [79.7%] male; 210 [89%] white; mean follow-up, 88.6±55.0 months), 212 (90.2%) completed pretransplant treatment and 135 (57.2%) attended AA weekly. At 5 years, 16.3% and 8.2% had relapsed to any alcohol use and to high-dose drinking, respectively. Smoking during the 6 months before transplant was associated with any relapse (P=.0002) and high-dose relapse (P<.0001), and smoking at transplant was associated with death (P=.001). High-dose relapse was associated with death (hazard ratio, 3.5; P<.0001).

Conclusion

A transplant center with a guideline requiring abstinence, treatment, and AA participation experienced lower posttransplant relapse rates from those previously reported in comparable large US transplant programs. Smoking cessation may further improve posttransplant outcomes.

Direct Alcohol Biomarkers Prediction Capacity on Relapse and Mortality in Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Follow-Up Study

Liver transplantation is a complex procedure that requires multiple evaluations, including abstinence monitorization. While literature assessing the impact of different variables on relapse, survival, and graft loss exists, little is known about the predictive capacity of direct alcohol biomarkers. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the prediction capacity of direct alcohol biomarkers regarding patient survival and clinical relapse. We hypothesized that patients screening positive for any of the experimental biomarkers would show an increased risk of clinical alcohol relapse and death. We conducted a retrospective data recollection from medical files of patients awaiting liver transplantation, who were at baseline screened with Peth, EtG in hair and urine, and EtS. We tested the prediction capacity of the biomarkers with two Cox-regression models. A total of 50 patients were included (84% men, mean age 59 years (SD = 6)). Biomarkers at baseline were positive in 18 patients. The mean follow-up time for this study was 26 months (SD = 10.4). Twelve patients died, liver transplantation was carried out in 12 patients, and clinical relapse was observed in eight patients. The only significant covariate in the Cox-regression models was age with clinical relapse, with younger patients being at greater risk of relapse. This study could not find a significant prediction capacity of direct alcohol biomarkers for mortality or clinical relapse during follow-up. Higher sample sizes might be needed to detect statistically significant differences. All in all, we believe that direct alcohol biomarkers should be widely used in liver transplantation settings due to their high sensitivity for the detection of recent drinking.

Transplants for Acute Alcoholic Hepatitis: Controversies and Early Successes

Liver transplant for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis remains a controversial practice despite evidence for a substantial survival benefit compared with medical therapy and posttransplant alcohol relapse rates comparable with previously published studies in alcohol-associated cirrhosis. The controversy stems in part from concern regarding patient selection practices, lack of long-term follow-up data, and the potential negative public perception of the practice affecting organ donation. Despite these concerns, it seems that early liver transplant for alcohol-associated hepatitis is increasingly being offered to selected patients across the United States and the world.

Recidivism in Liver Transplant Recipients for Alcohol-related Liver Disease

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only cure for patients with end-stage liver disease, which offers good long-term survival. The long-term issues after LT affecting survival are cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, de novo malignancies, recurrence of original disease and immunological causes. Alcoholic-related liver disease (ALD) is one of the most common indications for LT worldwide including India. LT for ALD is associated with several unique challenges as compared with other etiologies. Long-term survival after LT in patients with ALD is affected by recidivism. Various studies have shown different predictors of relapse; the main predictors of relapse are pretransplant abstinence, psychiatric comorbidities, and lack of social support. Although several risk scores have been proposed, these scores are not validated. Studies with active involvement of psychiatrist have shown lower relapse rates. The relapse prevention strategy for reducing likelihood and severity of relapse after initial cessation of alcohol uses a combination of pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral approach (identifying and addressing high-risk situations for relapse).

Liver transplant for alcoholic hepatitis: a current clinical overview

INTRODUCTION

Current management of severe alcoholic hepatitis is based on corticosteroid therapy and abstinence from alcohol. As liver transplantation is lifesaving in alcoholic hepatitis patients at high risk of early death, refractory alcoholic hepatitis has become a new indication for liver transplantation in highly selected non-responders to corticosteroids.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the conditions under which liver transplantation may be considered, the available data on liver transplantation for refractory alcoholic hepatitis and explores the ethical considerations surrounding the use of liver transplantation in these patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Selection of candidates should be made according to available scientific results on post-liver transplantation outcomes and the risk of alcohol relapse. Currently, a strict selection process based on a good psychosocial profile, including social stability, no previous treatments for alcohol dependence, no current drug use, and no co-existing severe mental disorder, seems to be the best way to manage these issues. Well-defined selection criteria for candidate selection and accurate tools to predict alcohol relapse after liver transplantation are still needed.

Impact of PNPLA3 (rs738409-G) polymorphism on post-transplant outcomes after liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver disease

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the association between PNPLA3 polymorphism and post-liver transplantation (LT) outcomes related to alcohol relapse (AR).

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients receiving LT for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) from 04/2014 to 12/2017. Liver-related clinical outcomes were assessed by the gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) level and alcohol-related liver failure (ARLF). Genotyping was performed using prospectively collected DNA samples in both donors and recipients.

RESULTS

A total of 83 recipients were enrolled. Post-LT AR occurred in 31 patients (37.3%). Thirty-one patients (14 AR, 9 abstainers) showed elevated GGT levels, and 3 AR patients experienced ARLF. In the multivariate analysis, rs738409 G allele carrier and heavy drinking (HRAR score ≥ 4) were independent risk factors for elevated GGT levels (odds ratio [OR] = 8.69, P < .01; OR = 13.07, P = .01) and ARLF (OR = 4.52, P = .04; OR = 19.62, P = .03). Among 15 heavy AR patients, being an rs738409 G allele carrier was related to GGT elevation (P = .03) and ARLF (P = .04), but it was not related to GGT elevation in mild drinkers (n = 16) or abstainers (n = 52).

CONCLUSION

PNPLA3 polymorphism of the recipient genotype can independently affect the post-LT prognosis of LT patients for ALD, especially in heavy AR patients. Therefore, strong abstinence education is recommended in patients with this single nucleotide polymorphism.

Natural History of Recurrent Alcohol-Related Cirrhosis After Liver Transplantation: Fast and Furious

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is one of the main indications for liver transplantation (LT). Severe alcohol relapse can rapidly lead to recurrent alcohol-related cirrhosis (RAC) for the graft. The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of RAC and the overall survival after LT and after an RAC diagnosis. From 1992 to 2012, 812 patients underwent primary LT for ALD in 5 French transplant centers. All patients with severe alcohol relapse and an RAC diagnosis on the graft were included. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on the analysis of liver biopsy or on the association of clinical, biological, radiological, and/or endoscopic features of cirrhosis. RAC was diagnosed in 57/162 patients (35.2%) with severe alcohol relapse, and 31 (54.4%) of those patients had at least 1 episode of liver decompensation. The main types of decompensation were ascites (70.9%), jaundice (58.0%), and hepatic encephalopathy (9.6%). The cumulative probability of decompensation was 23.8% at 5 years, 50.1% at 10 years, and 69.9% at 15 years after LT. During the follow-up, 36 (63.2%) patients died, the main cause of death being liver failure (61.1%). After diagnosis of cirrhosis, the survival rate was 66.3% at 1 year, 37.8% at 5 years, and 20.6% at 10 years. In conclusion, RAC is associated with a high risk of liver decompensation and a poor prognosis. Prevention of severe alcohol relapse after LT is a major goal to improve patient survival.

Alcohol Use Relapse Following Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND Alcohol use disorders affect 10% of the European population. Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in Slovakia. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with ALD who received a liver transplant who had alcohol relapsed, and the risk factors for alcohol relapse, as well as to compare clinical outcomes according to relapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of consecutive patients with ALD, who underwent liver transplantation in a single transplant center between May 2008 and December 2017. We included adult patients who received a liver transplant due to ALD and excluded those who died <1 month after liver transplantation. We recorded demographic and clinical characteristics, graft injury, and overall mortality and compared them between relapsers and abstainers. RESULTS During the study period, we reviewed 196 cases of liver transplantation in 191 patients. We excluded 87 patients for non-ALD etiology and 15 patients by predefined criteria. The final analysis was carried out in 89 patients, mean aged 55 years; 24.7% were female. We diagnosed relapse in 23 patients (26%) with harmful drinking in 52% and occasional drinking in 48% of relapsers. The independent risk factors associated with relapse were: smoking (OR=5.92, P=0.006), loss of social status (OR=7.61, P=0.002), and time after liver transplantation (OR=1.0008, P=0.015). Graft injury was more frequent in relapsers with 2 independent risk factors: occasional drinking (OR=12.7, P=0.0005), and harmful drinking (OR=36.6, P<0.0001); overall survival was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS We found relapse to alcohol drinking in 26% of patients who received a liver transplant for ALD. Risk factors associated with alcohol drinking relapse were time, cigarette smoking, and loss of social status. Graft injury was more frequent in relapsers, but mortality was similar between relapsers and non-relapsers.

The Role of Liver Transplantation in Alcoholic Hepatitis

Acute alcoholic hepatitis is a syndrome of jaundice and hepatic decompensation that occurs with excessive alcohol consumption. The diagnosis can be made with a combination of clinical characteristics and laboratory studies, though biopsy may be required in unclear cases. Acute alcoholic hepatitis can range from mild to severe disease, as determined by a Maddrey discriminant function ≥32. Mild forms can be managed with supportive care and abstinence from alcohol. While mild form has an overall good prognosis, severe alcoholic hepatitis is associated with an extremely high short-term mortality of up to 50%. Additional complications of severe alcoholic hepatitis can include hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, and infection; these patients frequently require intensive care unit admission. Corticosteroids may have short-term benefit in this group of patients if there are no contraindications; however, a subset of patients do not respond to steroids. New emerging therapies, which target hepatic regeneration, bile acid metabolism, and extracorporeal liver support, are being investigated. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease was traditionally only considered in patients who have achieved 6 months of abstinence, in part due to social and ethical concerns regarding the use of a limited resource. However, the majority of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who fail medical therapy will not live long enough to meet this requirement. Recent studies have demonstrated that early liver transplantation in carefully selected patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who fail medical therapy can provide a significant survival benefit and yields survival outcomes comparable to liver transplantation for other indications, with 6-month survival rates ranging from 77% to 100%. Alcohol relapse posttransplantation remains an important challenge, and heavy consumption can contribute to graft loss and mortality. Future investigation should address the substantial post-liver transplantation recidivism rate, from improving selection criteria to increasing posttransplantation substance abuse treatment resources.

Controversies in early liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis

Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a condition of acute liver inflammation in the setting of heavy alcohol use that is often managed with corticosteroids in severe cases. Among non-responders to steroids, however, prognosis is poor with up to 75% mortality within 6 months after treatment failure. Early liver transplantation (LT) can achieve an acceptable short-term survival, and initial studies have demonstrated 3-year survival rates of up to 84%. However, the practice of early LT in severe AH remains controversial with concerns over the 6-month rule of sobriety and risk of alcohol relapse post-transplant. Proponents of LT advocate for better understanding of alcohol use as a disorder rather than self-inflicted cause of illness, aim to redefine the misguided application of the 6-month rule, and point out similar relapse rates among patients with early LT and those with greater than 6 months abstinence before transplant. Opponents of LT emphasize the correlation between alcohol relapse and graft failure and mortality, public resistance and potential for distrust among donors, and arguments that transplant centers need to establish improved models to predict relapse and standardize candidate selection criteria across centers. Here we review recent literature on this controversy and provide recommendations for moving forward to consensus.

Outcomes and predictors of harmful relapse following liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease in an Australian population

BACKGROUND

Limited studies of patient survival and alcoholic relapse following transplantation for alcoholic liver disease have been described in Australian populations.

AIM

To describe these outcomes in an Australian population, to determine the association between harmful alcoholic relapse and patient survival, and to examine pre-transplant variables associated with harmful relapse.

METHODS

Single centre, retrospective review of consecutive patients transplanted at the South Australian Liver Transplant Unit. Relapse was identified by an independent investigator using case note review and confidential patient questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients (median age 52 years, 84% male, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score 18) was included in the study with a median follow-up time of 50 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of patients was 93.1, 87.4 and 82.0% respectively. Two deaths were directly attributable to graft failure due to alcohol. Fourteen (16%) patients fulfilled criteria for harmful relapse and 18 (21%) patients experienced any form of relapse to alcohol. Harmful relapse was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-9.7, P = 0.041). Only two factors were independently associated with harmful relapse on multivariate analysis; prior alcohol rehabilitation (HR 8.4, 95% CI 2.5-28.4, P = 0.001) and single versus married status (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-1.2, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Good patient survival outcomes were seen for this South Australian population. Harmful alcohol relapse occurs in a minority of patients and rarely results in direct graft loss. Modifiable pre-transplant factors that predict harmful relapse were not identified.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcoholic Liver Disease

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) comprises a clinical-histologic spectrum including fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis (AH), and cirrhosis with its complications. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages and data on the prevalence and profile of patients with early disease are limited. Diagnosis of ALD requires documentation of chronic heavy alcohol use and exclusion of other causes of liver disease. Prolonged abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent disease progression. AH presents with rapid onset or worsening of jaundice, and in severe cases may transition to acute on chronic liver failure when the risk for mortality, depending on the number of extra-hepatic organ failures, may be as high as 20-50% at 1 month. Corticosteroids provide short-term survival benefit in about half of treated patients with severe AH and long-term mortality is related to severity of underlying liver disease and is dependent on abstinence from alcohol. General measures in patients hospitalized with ALD include inpatient management of liver disease complications, management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, surveillance for infections and early effective antibiotic therapy, nutritional supplementation, and treatment of the underlying alcohol-use disorder. Liver transplantation, a definitive treatment option in patients with advanced alcoholic cirrhosis, may also be considered in selected patients with AH cases, who do not respond to medical therapy. There is a clinical unmet need to develop more effective and safer therapies for patients with ALD.

Impact of etiological treatment on prognosis

Portal hypertension (PHT) is a frequent and severe complication of cirrhosis. PHT may lead to the development of various complications with high mortality. Liver transplantation is the gold standard as a surgical curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Theoretically, etiological treatment focusing on the pathophysiology of the underlying disease should be the objective of the nonsurgical management of cirrhotic PHT. Chronic viral hepatitis is the major etiology of cirrhosis and PHT. In cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, antiviral therapies can suppress viral replication, ameliorate hepatic inflammation, regress fibrosis, and restore liver functional reserve. Moreover, they can delay the progression of liver cirrhosis and ameliorate the severity of PHT. In patients with hepatitis C virus-induced liver cirrhosis, interferon and ribavirin combination therapy provide a favorable long-term prognosis, including lower rates of liver-related and non-liver-related deaths, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly in those who have successful eradication of the virus after therapy. In patients with PHT, direct antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus infection have good safety profiles and excellent viral suppression. Moreover, DAAs can reduce hepatic venous pressure gradient. However, these effects are stronger during the earlier stage of liver cirrhosis. Abstinence is the cornerstone of etiological treatment for alcoholic liver disease. The effects of pharmacological treatments are not satisfactory, and additional studies are mandatory.

Risk factors and outcomes associated with alcohol relapse after liver transplantation

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States and Europe. Unlike other indications for LT, transplantation for ALD may be controversial due to the concern for alcohol relapse and non-compliance after LT. However, the overall survival in patients transplanted for ALD is comparable or higher than in patients transplanted for other etiologies of liver disease. While the rate of alcohol use after liver transplantation does not differ among various etiologies of liver disease, alcohol relapse after transplantation for ALD has been associated with complications such as graft rejection, graft loss, recurrent alcoholic cirrhosis and reduced long-term patient survival. Given these potential complications, our review aimed to discuss risk factors associated with alcohol relapse and the efficacy of various interventions attempted to reduce the risk of alcohol relapse. We also describe the impact of alcohol relapse on post-transplant outcomes including graft and patient survival. Overall, alcohol liver disease remains an appropriate indication for liver transplantation, and long-term mortality in this group of patients is primarily attributed to cardiovascular disease or de novo malignancies rather than alcohol related hepatic complications, among those who relapse.

Liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis-The CON view

In patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH) who have failed medical therapy, liver transplantation (LT) remains a controversial therapeutic option. This is exemplified by the fact that most of these patients will not have had a period of abstinence prior to consideration for transplantation. Both abstinence before transplantation and the duration of abstinence are important predictors of post-transplant relapse. Furthermore, relapse after transplantation has been associated with accelerated graft injury and increase mortality. Recent pilot studies have demonstrated a benefit in short-term survival with early transplantation in highly selected small number of patients compared to matched controls. The results of these studies raises the possibility of extending graft allocation to these subjects. Despite stringent assessment and a multi-tiered approach to selecting out patients for transplantation, the relapse rate was not insignificant at 12%. As the long-term outcome remains unclear, further relapses with time can still occur. These studies also highlight the fact that the overwhelming majority of subjects with severe AH who are non-responsive to medical therapy are not suitable for LT. Indeed, further large-scale multicentre prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm the preliminary findings.