Biliary reconstructive techniques and associated anatomic variants in adult living donor liver transplantations: The adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study experience

Optimizing pediatric liver transplantation: Evaluating the impact of donor age and graft type on patient survival outcome

BACKGROUND

We examined the combined effects of donor age and graft type on pediatric liver transplantation outcomes with an aim to offer insights into the strategic utilization of these donor and graft options.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a national database on 0-2-year-old (N = 2714) and 3-17-year-old (N = 2263) pediatric recipients. These recipients were categorized based on donor age (≥40 vs <40 years) and graft type. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, followed by an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis to examine overall patient survival.

RESULTS

Living and younger donors generally resulted in better outcomes compared to deceased and older donors, respectively. This difference was more significant among younger recipients (0-2 years compared to 3-17 years). Despite this finding, ITT survival analysis showed that donor age and graft type did not impact survival with the exception of 0-2-year-old recipients who had an improved survival with a younger living donor graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely transplantation has the largest impact on survival in pediatric recipients. Improving waitlist mortality requires uniform surgical expertise at many transplant centers to provide technical variant graft (TVG) options and shed the conservative mindset of seeking only the "best" graft for pediatric recipients.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Left Lobe or Right Lobe

Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) has seen great advancements since its inception in 1988. Herein, the nuances of LDLT are discussed spanning from donor evaluation to the recipient operation. Special attention is given to donor anatomy and graft optimization techniques in the recipient.

Left Lobe First With Purely Laparoscopic Approach: A Novel Strategy to Maximize Donor Safety in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate outcome of left-lobe graft (LLG) first combined with purely laparoscopic donor hemihepatectomy (PLDH) as a strategy to minimize donor risk.

BACKGROUND

An LLG first approach and a PLDH are 2 methods used to reduce surgical stress for donors in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). But the risk associated with application LLG first combined with PLDH is not known.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2023, 186 adult LDLTs were performed with hemiliver grafts, procured by open surgery in 95 and PLDH in 91 cases. LLGs were considered first when graft-to-recipient weight ratio ≥0.6%. Following a 4-month adoption process, all donor hepatectomies, since December 2019, were performed laparoscopically.

RESULTS

There was one intraoperative conversion to open (1%). Mean operative times were similar in laparoscopic and open cases (366 vs 371 minutes). PLDH provided shorter hospital stays, lower blood loss, and lower peak aspartate aminotransferase. Peak bilirubin was lower in LLG donors compared with right-lobe graft donors (1.4 vs 2.4 mg/dL, P < 0.01), and PLDH further improved the bilirubin levels in LLG donors (1.2 vs 1.6 mg/dL, P < 0.01). PLDH also afforded a low rate of early complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II, 8% vs 22%, P = 0.007) and late complications, including incisional hernia (0% vs 13.7%, P < 0.001), compared with open cases. LLG was more likely to have a single duct than a right-lobe graft (89% vs 60%, P < 0.01). Importantly, with the aggressive use of LLG in 47% of adult LDLT, favorable graft survival was achieved without any differences between the type of graft and surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The LLG first with PLDH approach minimizes surgical stress for donors in adult LDLT without compromising recipient outcomes. This strategy can lighten the burden for living donors, which could help expand the donor pool.

Multiple Graft Bile Ducts Do Not Affect the Postoperative Outcomes of Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Multiple graft duct openings are associated with a high incidence of biliary complications (BCs), and biliary reconstruction for multiple graft bile ducts (BDs) remains a surgical challenge during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In particular, biliary reconstruction using "high biliary radicals (HBR)" of recipients for multiple graft BDs has a high probability of BCs. Herein, we analyzed outcomes by retrospectively reviewing 283 patients who underwent right lobe LDLT from January 2013 to September 2019. In total, 112 LDLT procedures using grafts with multiple BDs have been performed under our policies. In recent cases with 2 orifices located on the same hilar plate, we did dunking with a mucosal eversion technique instead of ductoplasty. When 2 orifices are located far apart on different hilar plates, we attempted to perform separate duct-to-duct anastomosis (DDA) using HBR of the recipient instead of hepaticojejunostomy. Among patients with multiple graft BDs, 20 underwent ductoplasty, 50 were treated using dunking with mucosal eversion technique, and 40 underwent separate DDA using HBR (HBR group). The incidence rates of biliary leakage and stricture were 8.9% and 10.7% in the multiple BD group, respectively, congruent with the outcomes of the single BD group. In subgroup analysis, we compared clinical outcomes between the HBR and single BD groups; the incidence of BCs in the HBR group was 15.0%, comparable to that of the single BD group. In conclusion, multiple graft BDs do not negatively impact the BC rate compared with single-graft BD when applying our technique to prevent BCs.

Preliminary safety and efficacy of laser stricturotomy for treatment of refractory biliary anastomotic strictures following liver transplantation

Biliary anastomotic stricture (BAS) is a frequent complication of liver transplantation and is associated with reduced graft survival and patient morbidity. Existing treatments for BAS involve dilation of the stricture though placement of 1 or more catheters for 6 to 24 months yielding limited effectiveness in transplant patients. In this case series, we present preliminary safety and efficacy of a novel percutaneous laser stricturotomy treatment in a cohort of 5 posttransplant patients with BAS refractory to long-term large bore catheterization. In all patients, holmium or thulium laser was used to excise the stricture and promote biliary re-epithelization. There were no periprocedural complications. Technical success was 100% and at mean follow-up time of 22 months, there have been no recurrences. In conclusion, percutaneous laser stricturotomy demonstrates preliminary safety and efficacy in treatment of refractory BAS following liver transplantation.

A rare hepatic artery variant reporting and a new classification

Variations of the hepatic artery are very common, but they greatly increase the difficulty of surgery and the risk of complications in perihepatic surgeries such as liver transplantation, liver segmentectomy, and gastroduodenal surgery. Thus, it is important to precisely define the type of hepatic artery variant before surgery. However, there are often rare variants that cannot be defined with existing classifications. For example, the type of hepatic artery variant in the current case could not be classified with conventional classifications, and no such variation has been reported to date, involving two accessory left hepatic arteries from the common hepatic and left inferior phrenic arteries, respectively. Based on the existing 3DCT technology and the CRL classification method, which is applicable to the most common hepatic artery variants, we reviewed many rare variant types and proposed a new classification method (ex-CRL classification) for hepatic artery variations that do not fit the classic scope. The ex-CRL classification can accurately classify the vast majority of rare cases in the literature, greatly compensates for the limitations of current hepatic artery classifications, improves the generalization and understanding of rare cases, and reduces surgical complications.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of outcomes after open, mini-laparotomy, hybrid, totally laparoscopic, and robotic living donor right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes after living donor right hepatectomy via the following techniques: conventional open (Open), mini-laparotomy (Minilap), hybrid (Hybrid), totally laparoscopic (Lap), and robotic living donor right hepatectomy (Robotic).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched from inception to August 2021 for comparative studies of patients who underwent living donor right hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies comprising 2,261 patients were included. Operation time was longer in Lap versus Minilap and Open (mean difference 65.09 min, 95% confidence interval 3.40-126.78 and mean difference 34.81 minutes, 95% confidence interval 1.84-67.78), and in Robotic versus Hybrid, Lap, Minilap, and Open (mean difference 144.72 minutes, 95% confidence interval 89.84-199.59, mean difference 113.24 minutes, 95% confidence interval 53.28-173.20, mean difference 178.33 minutes, 95% confidence interval 105.58-251.08 and mean difference 148.05 minutes, 95% confidence interval 97.35-198.74, respectively). Minilap and Open were associated with higher blood loss compared to Lap (mean difference 258.67 mL, 95% confidence interval 107.00-410.33 and mean difference 314.11 mL, 95% confidence interval 143.84-484.37) and Robotic (mean difference 205.60 mL, 95% confidence interval 45.92-365.28 and mean difference 261.04 mL, 95% confidence interval 84.26-437.82). Open was associated with more overall complications compared to Minilap (odds ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.11-6.08). Recipient biliary complication rate was higher in Minilap and Open versus Hybrid (odds ratio 3.91, 95% confidence interval 1.13-13.55 and odds ratio 11.42, 95% confidence interval 2.27-57.49), and lower in Open versus Minilap (OR 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.34).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive donor right hepatectomy via the various techniques is safe and feasible when performed in high-volume centers, with no major differences in donor complication rates and comparable recipient outcomes once surgeons have mounted the learning curve.

Biliary complications in recipients of living donor liver transplantation: A single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications (BCs) after liver transplantation (LT) remain a considerable cause of morbidity, mortality, increased cost, and graft loss.

AIM

To investigate the impact of BCs on chronic graft rejection, graft failure and mortality.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2016, 215 adult recipients underwent right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (RT-LDLT) at our centre. We excluded 46 recipients who met the exclusion criteria, and 169 recipients were included in the final analysis. Donors’ and recipients’ demographic data, clinical data, operative details and postoperative course information were collected. We also reviewed the management and outcomes of BCs. Recipients were followed for at least 12 mo post-LT until December 2017 or graft or patient loss.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rate of BCs including biliary leakage, biliary infection and biliary stricture was 57.4%. Twenty-seven (16%) patients experienced chronic graft rejection. Graft failure developed in 20 (11.8%) patients. A total of 28 (16.6%) deaths occurred during follow-up. BCs were a risk factor for the occurrence of chronic graft rejection and failure; however, mortality was determined by recurrent hepatitis C virus infection.

CONCLUSION

Biliary complications after RT-LDLT represent an independent risk factor for chronic graft rejection and graft failure; nonetheless, effective management of these complications can improve patient and graft survival.

Circuitous Path to Live Donor Liver Transplantation from the Coordinator's Perspective

Background: The live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) process is circuitous and requires a considerable amount of coordination and matching in multiple aspects that the literature does not completely address. From the coordinators’ perspective, we systematically analyzed the time and risk factors associated with interruptions in the LDLT process. Methods: In this retrospective single center study, we reviewed the medical records of wait-listed hospitalized patients and potential live donors who arrived for evaluation. We analyzed several characteristics of transplant candidates, including landmark time points of accompanied live donation evaluation processes, time of eventual LDLT, and root causes of not implementing LDLT. Results: From January 2014 to January 2021, 417 patients (342 adults and 75 pediatric patients) were enrolled, of which 331 (79.4%) patients completed the live donor evaluation process, and 205 (49.2%) received LDLT. The median time from being wait-listed to the appearance of a potential live donor was 19.0 (interquartile range 4.0–58.0) days, and the median time from the appearance of the donor to an LDLT or a deceased donor liver transplantation was 68.0 (28.0–188.0) days. The 1-year mortality rate for patients on the waiting list was 34.3%. Presence of hepatitis B virus, encephalopathy, and hypertension as well as increased total bilirubin were risk factors associated with not implementing LDLT, and biliary atresia was a positive predictor. The primary barriers to LDLT were a patient’s critical illness, donor’s physical conditions, motivation for live donation, and stable condition while on the waiting list. Conclusions: Transplant candidates with potential live liver donors do not necessarily receive LDLT. The process requires time, and the most common reason for LDLT failure was critical diseases. Aggressive medical support and tailored management policies for these transplantable patients might help reduce their loss during the process.

Liver transplantation in pediatric patients under 15 kg; duct-to-duct vs. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy biliary anastomoses

Back ground. Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for acute or chronic liver failure and metabolic liver disease, which is associated with good quality of life in over 80 percent of recipients. We aimed to evaluate outcome of duct-to-duct vs. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy biliary anastomoses in pediatric liver transplant recipients below 15-kg.

Methods. In this single-center retrospective study, all children less than 15 kg that have undergone liver transplantation at Nemazee Hospital Organ Transplant Center affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from 2009 till 2019, were enrolled. Over a 10-yr period, 181 liver transplants were performed in patients with two techniques including duct-to-duct (Group 1) vs. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy biliary anastomoses (Group 2). All data was collected from patients’ medical records, operative notes, and post-transplant follow up notes. Data was analyzed by SPSS software V21.

Results. Overall, 94 patients had duct to duct anastomosis (group 1) and 87 cases had Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 2.46 ± 1.5. The most common underlying diseases was biliary atresia (32%). The most prevalent complication after the surgery was infection in both groups. cardiopulmonary problems were significantly higher in group 2 (24.1% vs 4.3%) (p < 0.001). The rate of infection was significantly higher in group 2, as well.

Conclusion. Our study showed a relatively high rate of post-operative infection which was the most among patients who had undergone Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Except from biliary complications which were mostly observed in DD group, other complications were more common among Roux-en-Y group.

Management and outcome of hepatic artery thrombosis after pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pediatric LT are at particular risk of HAT, and its management still constitutes a matter of debate. Our purpose was to study predisposing factors and outcome of HAT post-LT, including the impact of surgical revisions on survival and biliary complications.

METHODS

Among 882 primary pediatric LT performed between 1993 and 2015, 36 HAT were encountered (4.1%, 35 fully documented). Each HAT case was retrospectively paired with a LT recipient without HAT, according to diagnosis, age at LT, type of graft, and era.

RESULTS

Five-year patient survivals were 77.0% versus 83.9% in HAT and non-HAT paired groups, respectively (P = .321). Corresponding graft survivals were 20.0% versus 80.5% (P < .001), and retransplantation rates 77.7% versus 10.7%, respectively (P < .001). One-year biliary complication-free survivals were 16.6% versus 83.8% in the HAT and non-HAT groups, respectively (P < .001). Regarding chronology of surgical re-exploration, only HAT cases that occurred within 14 days post-LT were re-operated, fourteen of them being explored within 7 days post-LT (revascularization rate: 6/14), versus two beyond 7 days (no revascularization). When revascularization was achieved, graft and biliary complication-free survival rates at 1 year were 33.3% and 22.2%, respectively, both rates being 0.0% in case of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The pejorative prognosis associated with HAT in terms of graft survival is confirmed, whereas patient survival could be preserved through retransplantation. Results suggest that HAT should be re-operated if occurring within 7 days post-LT, but not beyond.

Bile acid-activated macrophages promote biliary epithelial cell proliferation through integrin αvβ6 upregulation following liver injury

Cholangiopathies caused by biliary epithelial cell (BEC) injury represent a leading cause of liver failure. No effective pharmacologic therapies exist, and the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. We aimed to explore the mechanisms of bile duct repair after targeted BEC injury. Injection of intermedilysin into BEC-specific human CD59 (hCD59) transgenic mice induced acute and specific BEC death, representing a model to study the early signals that drive bile duct repair. Acute BEC injury induced cholestasis followed by CCR2+ monocyte recruitment and BEC proliferation. Using microdissection and next-generation RNA-Seq, we identified 5 genes, including Mapk8ip2, Cdkn1a, Itgb6, Rgs4, and Ccl2, that were most upregulated in proliferating BECs after acute injury. Immunohistochemical analyses confirmed robust upregulation of integrin αvβ6 (ITGβ6) expression in this BEC injury model, after bile duct ligation, and in patients with chronic cholangiopathies. Deletion of the Itgb6 gene attenuated BEC proliferation after acute bile duct injury. Macrophage depletion or Ccr2 deficiency impaired ITGβ6 expression and BEC proliferation. In vitro experiments revealed that bile acid-activated monocytes promoted BEC proliferation through ITGβ6. Our data suggest that BEC injury induces cholestasis, monocyte recruitment, and induction of ITGβ6, which work together to promote BEC proliferation and therefore represent potential therapeutic targets for cholangiopathies.

[Bilary anastomotic strictures after right lobe living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of AS after right lobe living donor liver transplantation with various biliary reconstructions and to identify the predictors of this complication.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective and prospective analysis included 245 RLLDLTs for the period 2011-2018 at the Burnazjan Federal Medical Biophysical Center. The results of transplantations in 207 patients aged 19-68 years (median 43 years) were assessed. There were 82 men and 125 women. Follow-up period ranged from 10 to 98 months (median 35 months). We analyzed the relationship between surgical characteristics (preoperative data of recipients and donors, graft parameters, technical features of biliary reconstruction and features of post-transplantation period) and incidence of anastomotic strictures. A total of 58 parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

AS occurred in 20 (9.7%) recipients. Median AS-free period was 5 months (range 1-44). In 17 (85%) patients, AC developed within a year after surgery. Cumulative 1-, 2- and 5-year incidence of AS was 8.3%, 8.9%, and 11%, respectively. Significant predictors of AS were impaired arterial blood supply to the graft (HR 7.8, 95% CI 2.3-26.0, p<0.001), biliary leakage ISGLS class B or C (HR 5.0, 95% CI 2.0-12.8, p<0.001), early allograft dysfunction (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5-11.6, p=0.006) and female recipient (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.9, p=0.04). In our sample, variant biliary anatomy of the graft and recipient liver, as well as technical features of biliary reconstruction did not affect the risk of AS.

CONCLUSION

Variant biliary anatomy of potential donor alone should not be considered as a contraindication for organ donation and right liver lobe transplantation. Precise surgical technique, high transplantation activity, as well as experience of reconstructive interventions on the bile ducts during other operations can significantly reduce the incidence of AS after RLLDLT up to 9.7%.

Bile duct reconstruction using scaffold-free tubular constructs created by Bio-3D printer

Introduction

Biliary strictures after bile duct injury or duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction are serious complications that markedly reduce patients’ quality of life because their treatment involves periodic stent replacements. This study aimed to create a scaffold-free tubular construct as an interposition graft to treat biliary complications.

Methods

Scaffold-free tubular constructs of allogeneic pig fibroblasts, that is, fibroblast tubes, were created using a Bio-3D Printer and implanted into pigs as interposition grafts for duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction.

Results

Although the fibroblast tube was weaker than the native bile duct, it was sufficiently strong to enable suturing. The pigs' serum hepatobiliary enzyme levels remained stable during the experimental period. Micro-computed tomography showed no biliary strictures, no biliary leakages, and no intrahepatic bile duct dilations. The tubular structure was retained in all resected specimens, and the fibroblasts persisted at the graft sites. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed angiogenesis in the fibroblast tube and absence of extensions of the biliary epithelium into the fibroblast tube's lumen.

Conclusions

This study's findings demonstrated successful reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct with a scaffold-free tubular construct created from pig fibroblasts using a novel Bio-3D Printer. This construct could provide a novel regenerative treatment for patients with hepatobiliary diseases.

Living-donor liver transplantation: Right versus left

A dilemma of graft selection between right or left livers occurs during the planning of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as well as splitting a whole liver graft into full right/full left grafts in deceased-donor liver transplantation. The right liver's relation to the whole liver could be considered as the trunk of a tree; it has a larger volume, the main axis of bile ducts, and the inferior vena cava mainly belongs to the right liver. Therefore, it was considered as the standard graft in LDLTs. Whether to procure the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with a right liver graft or to leave it attached to the left-liver remnant largely depends on the transplant institute. Recently, most transplant institutes tend to leave the MHV with the left liver for the sake of donor safety. Unlike hepatectomy for liver tumors, it is vital to preserve inflow and outflow for both the resected as well as the remaining livers. While procuring any graft type, the most important is to procure a liver graft with reconstructable portal veins, hepatic arteries, hepatic veins, and bile ducts, which should be well preoperatively planned using 3D-computed tomography with considerations given to graft volume and potential congestion areas.

Novel Method for Reconstructing Multiple Graft Bile Ducts During Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant: Dunking With Mucosal Eversion Technique

BACKGROUND

Multiple graft bile ducts (BDs) and anastomoses have been considered as risk factors for biliary complications after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). Various surgical techniques have been introduced, and most surgeons perform unification ductoplasty for multiple adjacent BDs during LDLT. However, this could cause hemobilia and is difficult to perform when 2 ductal orifices are far apart or show a size discrepancy.

METHODS

Here, we introduce our novel reconstruction technique for multiple adjacent graft BDs and discuss its effects on postoperative outcomes compared with ductoplasty. We compared the clinical outcomes of 2 biliary reconstruction techniques by retrospectively reviewing 58 recipients who underwent LDLT with right lobe grafts using these 2 techniques at our institution between January 2013 and September 2018: group 1 (n = 20) received ductoplasty, and group 2 (n = 38) was treated with dunking with mucosal eversion technique.

RESULTS

Overall biliary complication rates were 20.0% in group 1 and 10.5% in group 2 (P = .32). Biliary stricture in group 2 was not frequent compared with that in group 1 (7.9% vs 15.0%, P = .398). Moreover, incidence of biliary stricture in group 2 was not different than that in the group using graft with single BD during the same period (P > .624).

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel technique could be a useful method for reconstructing adjacent BDs in LDLT and the best alternative to ductoplasty. Moreover, it seems to be a reasonable option when 2 orifices are far apart or show a size discrepancy.

The high-end range of biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent evidence in literature regarding incidence and risk factors for biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and current concepts in evaluation of donor biliary anatomy and surgical techniques of biliary reconstruction, to reduce the incidence of biliary complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in biliary imaging in the donor, both before surgery, and during donor hepatectomy, as well as safe hepatic duct isolation in the donor, have played a significant role in reducing biliary complications in both the donor and recipient. Duct-to-duct biliary anastomoses (DDA) is the preferred mode of biliary reconstruction currently, especially when there is a single bile duct orifice in the donor. The debate on stenting the anastomoses, especially a DDA, continues. Stenting a Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy in children with small ductal orifices in the donor is preferred. With growing experience, and use of meticulous surgical technique and necessary modifications, the incidence of biliary complications in multiple donor bile ducts, and more than one biliary anastomoses can be reduced.

SUMMARY

Biliary anastomosis continues to be the Achilles heel of LDLT. Apart from surgical technique, which includes correct choice of type of reconstruction technique and appropriate use of stents across ductal anastomoses, better imaging of the biliary tree, and safe isolation of the graft hepatic duct, could help reduce biliary complications in the recipient, and make donor hepatectomy safe .

Liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to discuss existing data on liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis, emerging controversies, and future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contemporary experience with transplanting patients with liver metastasis from colon cancer is mainly derived from European centers, with a large proportion being from a single institution (SECA study), made possible in part by a relatively high donor pool. The initial results prove to be encouraging by demonstrating an overall survival advantage over unresectable patients with liver-limited disease managed with chemotherapy only. Recurrence patterns, however, suggest a need for better patient selection and treatment sequencing optimization. In North America, the main barriers in establishing similar protocols result from national liver graft shortage, which represents an issue of competing resources when indications have yet to be well defined. Evolving strategies in transplantation, such as the utilization of marginal liver grafts and living donor liver transplantation might constitute potential solutions.

SUMMARY

Evidence suggests a potential survival benefit of liver transplantation for a subset of patients with unresectable liver-limited CRLM. Further prospective trials are needed to clarify the role and feasibility of this treatment strategy in oncotransplantation.

Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Introduced by Biliary Stents or Local Immersion in Porcine Bile Duct Anastomoses

Biliary complications (strictures and leaks) represent major limitations in living donor liver transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising modality to prevent biliary complications because of immunosuppressive and angiogenic properties. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of adipose-derived MSC delivery to biliary anastomoses in a porcine model. Secondary objectives were defining the optimal method of delivery (intraluminal versus extraluminal) and to investigate MSC engraftment, angiogenesis, and fibrosis. Pigs were divided into 3 groups. Animals underwent adipose collection, MSC isolation, and expansion. Two weeks later, animals underwent bile duct transection, reanastomosis, and stent insertion. Group 1 received plastic stents wrapped in unseeded Vicryl mesh. Group 2 received stents wrapped in MSC-seeded mesh. Group 3 received unwrapped stents with the anastomosis immersed in an MSC suspension. Animals were killed 1 month after stent insertion when cholangiograms and biliary tissue were obtained. Serum was collected for liver biochemistries. Tissue was used for hematoxylin-eosin and trichrome staining and immunohistochemistry for MSC markers (CD44 and CD34) and for a marker of neoangiogenesis (CD31). There were no intraoperative complications. One pig died on postoperative day 3 due to acute cholangitis. All others recovered without complications. Cholangiography demonstrated no biliary leaks and minimal luminal narrowing. Surviving animals exhibited no symptoms, abnormal liver biochemistries, or clinically significant biliary stricturing. Group 3 showed significantly greater CD44 and CD34 staining, indicating MSC engraftment. Fibrosis was reduced at the anastomotic site in group 3 based on trichrome stain. CD31 staining of group 3 was more pronounced, supporting enhanced neoangiogenesis. In conclusion, adipose-derived MSCs were safely applied to biliary anastomoses. MSCs were locally engrafted within the bile duct and may have beneficial effects in terms of fibrosis and angiogenesis.

Risk factors of hepatic artery thrombosis in pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) remains a life-threatening complication in liver transplantation. We aim to investigate the risk factors of HAT in deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

104 recipients from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled; donor and recipient characteristics, surgical variables, graft and recipient survival rate were compared between recipients with or without HAT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify the risk factors of HAT.

RESULTS

The recipient survival rate was 87.0% and 96.3% at 1 year, and 87.0% and 96.3% at 3 years in HAT and non-HAT groups without significant difference. The graft survival rate was 73.9% and 96.3% at 1 year, and 73.9% and 95.1% at 3 years in HAT and non-HAT groups; significant difference was observed between two groups at both 1 and 3 years. Donor age less than 8.5 months, graft weight less than 190 g and GRWR less than 2.2% were identified as independent risk factors for HAT. Recipients with HAT were associated with higher incidence of post-operative biliary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Young donor age and small liver graft are risk factors for HAT in deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation.

Donor ductal anomaly is not a contraindication to right liver lobe donation

BACKGROUND

Data of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) suggested that donor ductal anomaly may contribute to postoperative biliary complications in recipients and in donors. This retrospective study aimed to determine if the occurrence of postoperative biliary stricture in donors or recipients in right-lobe LDLT (RLDLT) is related to donor biliary anatomy type.

METHODS

We analyzed our RLDLT recipients' clinical data and those of their graft donors. The recipients were divided into 2 groups: with and without postoperative biliary stricture. The 2 groups were compared. The primary endpoints were donor biliary anatomy type and postoperative biliary complication incidence; the secondary endpoints were 1-, 3- and 5-year graft and patient survival rates.

RESULTS

Totally 127 patients were included in the study; 25 (19.7%) of them developed biliary anastomotic stricture. In these 25 patients, 16 had type A biliary anatomy, 3 had type B, 2 had type C, 3 had type D, and 1 had type E. In the 127 donors, 96 (75.6%) had type A biliary anatomy, 13 (10.2%) had type B, 6 (4.7%) had type C, 10 (7.9%) had type D, and 2 (1.6%) had type E. Biliary stricture was seen in 2 donors, who had type A biliary anatomy. None of the recipients or donors developed bile leakage. No association between the occurrence of postoperative biliary stricture and donor biliary anatomy type was found (P = 0.527).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of biliary stricture in donors or recipients after RLDLT was not related to donor biliary anatomy type. As postoperative complications were similar in whatever type of donor bile duct anatomy, donor ductal anomaly should not be considered a contraindication to donation of right liver lobe.

Early Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

AIM

Hepatic artery thrombosis is one of the major complications affecting patient and graft survival after liver transplantation. In this study, we analyzed the factors affecting the development of early hepatic artery thrombosis (eHAT) and its outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 175 pediatric patients underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2013 and November 2018. Factors affecting eHAT and its outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Nine patients (5.1%) developed eHAT. In multivariate analysis, intraoperative hepatic artery revision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy biliary reconstruction type were statistically significant (all, P < .05). Thrombectomy and reanastomosis was performed in 5 patients. Two of them were successful. In total, 3 retransplantations were performed and all of those patients are still alive.

CONCLUSION

The factors affecting eHAT are still a matter of debate. Intraoperative hepatic artery anastomosis revision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy reconstruction were independent risk factors for development of eHAT. In the present study, the confidence interval of the variables is high, therefore exact determination of the risk factors may not be possible. Early detection and thrombectomy and reanastomosis may be the first treatment of choice to rescue the patient and graft. When it fails, retransplantation must be an alternative. The results of the present study state that at least once a day the vascular anastomosis must be examined by Doppler ultrasonography in the post-transplant first week. It must be repeated when liver enzymes increase. The patients under high risk for eHAT may be followed up closer.

Adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation: The experience of the Université catholique de Louvain

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the treatment for end-stage liver diseases and well-selected malignancies. The allograft shortage may be alleviated with living donation. The initial UCLouvain experience of adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is presented.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 64 adult-to-adult LDLTs performed at our institution between 1998 and 2016 was conducted. The median age of 29 (45.3%) females and 35 (54.7%) males was 50.2 years (interquartile range, IQR 32.9-57.5). Twenty-two (34.4%) recipients had no portal hypertension. Three (4.7%) patients had a benign and 33 (51.6%) a malignant tumor [19 (29.7%) hepatocellular cancer, 11 (17.2%) secondary cancer and one (1.6%) each hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma and embryonal liver sarcoma]. Median donor and recipient follow-ups were 93 months (IQR 41-159) and 39 months (22-91), respectively.

RESULTS

Right and left hemi-livers were implanted in 39 (60.9%) and 25 (39.1%) cases, respectively. Median weights of right- and left-liver were 810 g (IQR 730-940) and 454 g (IQR 394-534), respectively. Graft-to-recipient weight ratios (GRWRs) were 1.17% (right, IQR 0.98%-1.4%) and 0.77% (left, 0.59%-0.95%). One- and five-year patient survivals were 85% and 71% (right) vs. 84% and 58% (left), respectively. One- and five-year graft survivals were 74% and 61% (right) vs. 76% and 53% (left), respectively. The patient and graft survival of right and left grafts and of very small (<0.6%), small (0.6%-0.79%) and large (≥0.8%) GRWR were similar. Survival of very small grafts was 86% and 86% at 3- and 12-month. No donor died while five (7.8%) developed a Clavien-Dindo complication IIIa, IIIb or IV. Recipient morbidity consisted mainly of biliary and vascular complications; three (4.7%) recipients developed a small-for-size syndrome according to the Kyushu criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult-to-adult LDLT is a demanding procedure that widens therapeutic possibilities of many hepatobiliary diseases. The donor procedure can be done safely with low morbidity. The recipient operation carries a major morbidity indicating an important learning curve. Shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient, by moving from the larger right-liver to the smaller left-liver grafts, should be further explored as this policy makes donor hepatectomy safer and may stimulate the development of transplant oncology.

Endoscopic Management of Biliary Issues in the Liver Transplant Patient

Biliary complications remain a common problem after liver transplantation (LT). The therapeutic endoscopist encounters a variety of situations in LT including strictures at the duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, strictures elsewhere in the biliary tree caused by an ischemic injury, and bile leaks at the anastomosis or from the cut surface and stone disease. Biliary complications lead to significant morbidity and occasionally reduced graft and patient survival. Several factors increase the risk of strictures and leaks. Endoscopic intervention in experienced hands is successful in the management of biliary complications following LT and percutaneous or surgical correction should seldom be required.

Longterm Analysis of Biliary Complications After Duct-to-Duct Biliary Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplantations

Biliary complication (BC) is still regarded as the Achilles' heel of a living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aims to evaluate the longterm outcomes of the duct-to-duct (DD) biliary reconstruction using 7-0 suture and to identify the risk factors of BCs after LDLTs. Data of 140 LDLTs between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed. All biliary reconstructions were performed as DD anastomoses using 7-0 suture: 102 for the right lobe, 20 for the left lobe, and 18 for right posterior sector grafts. BC was defined as a bile leakage (BL) or a biliary stricture (BS), and the median follow-up time after LDLT was 65 months. A total of 19 recipients (13.5%) developed BCs (8 BLs and 16 BSs) after LDLT. The survival rates between recipients with and without BCs were 83% and 86.7%, respectively (P = 0.88). In univariate analyses, the risk factors for BC were small diameter of the graft's bile duct, long warm ischemic time, small graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and no use of external biliary stent (EBS). The graft's bile duct diameter ≤ 3 mm and no use of EBS were determined as independent risk factors (hazard ratios of 9.74 and 7.68, respectively) in multivariate analyses. The 116 recipients with EBS had no BL, 11 had BSs (9%), while 24 without EBS had 8 BLs (33%) and 5 BSs (21%). After a propensity score match between the recipients with and without EBS, the EBS group (24) developed only 1 BS (4%). In conclusion, DD anastomosis using 7-0 suture combined with EBS could provide favorable longterm outcomes after LDLT, which should thus be considered the surgical technique of choice for LDLTs.

Effects of infection on post-transplant outcomes: living versus deceased donor liver transplants

Introduction

Post-transplant infections have been studied widely but data on comparisons of deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) and living donor liver transplants (LDLT), type and timings of infections, and their relations to outcomes are not explored.

Material and methods

We analysed data from 612 participants of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Study (A2ALL), a retrospective data set of LDLT and DDLT. We compared the type and timing of the first post-transplant infection in relation to transplant outcomes between the two groups.

Results

Out of 611 patients, 24.5% experienced the first post-transplant infection, the majority of which were bacterial (35.3%), followed by fungal (11%) and viral infections (4.2%). There was no significant difference in the rate, type or timing of infection between LDLT and DDLT. Patients with late (> 1 year) first infection were 1.8 times more likely to die (95% CI: 1.12-2.98, p = 0.015) and 9 times more likely to have graft failures (95% CI: 3.26-24.8, p < 0.001). DDLT recipients who experienced bacterial infection had a significantly lower survival rate compared to LDLT recipients (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Late infection is associated with lower survival in both DDLT and LDLT. Bacterial infection might be more detrimental for DDLT than LDLT. Late infection should be managed aggressively to improve outcomes.