Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: results with preoperative chemoembolization

Multidisciplinary Taiwan consensus for the use of conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Developed in early 1980s, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with Lipiodol was adopted globally after large-scale randomized control trials and meta-analyses proving its effectiveness were completed. Also known as "conventional TACE" (cTACE), TACE is currently the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and delivers both ischemic and cytotoxic effects to targeted tumors. Although new technology and clinical studies have contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of when and how to apply this widely-adopted therapeutic modality, some of these new findings and techniques have yet to be incorporated into a guideline appropriate for Taiwan. In addition, differences in the underlying liver pathologies and treatment practices for transcatheter embolization between Taiwan and other Asian or Western populations have not been adequately addressed, with significant variations in the cTACE protocols adopted in different parts of the world. These mainly revolve around the amount and type of chemotherapeutic agents used, the type of embolic materials, reliance on Lipiodol, and the degree of selectiveness in catheter positioning. Subsequently, interpreting and comparing results obtained from different centers in a systematic fashion remain difficult, even for experienced practitioners. To address these concerns, we convened a panel of experts specializing in different aspects of HCC treatment to devise modernized recommendations that reflect recent clinical experiences, as well as cTACE protocols which are tailored for use in Taiwan. The conclusions of this expert panel are described herein.

Liver targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to transplant: contemporary management strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive neoplastic disease that has been rapidly increasing in incidence. It usually occurs in the background of liver disease, and cirrhosis. Definitive therapy requires surgical resection. However, in majority of cases surgical resection is not tolerated, especially in the presence of portal hypertension and cirrhosis. Orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) in well selected candidates has been accepted as a viable option. Due to a relative scarcity of donors compared to the number of listed recipients, long waiting times are anticipated. To prevent patients with HCC from dropping out from the transplant list due to progression of their disease, most centers utilize loco-regional therapies. These loco-regional therapies(LRT) include minimally invasive treatments like percutaneous thermal ablation, trans-arterial chemoembolization, trans-arterial radio-embolization or a combination thereof. The type of therapy or combination used is determined by the size and location of the HCC and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification. The data regarding the efficacy of LRT in reducing post-transplant recurrence or disease-free survival is limited. This article reviews the available therapies, their strengths, limitations, and current use in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting transplant.

Bridging locoregional therapy: Longitudinal trends and outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

The purpose of this article is to analyze longitudinal trends in locoregional therapy (LRT) use and review locoregional therapy's role in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to orthotropic liver transplantation Porrett et al. (2006) . LRT has a role in both bridge to transplantation and downstaging of patients not initially meeting Milan or UCSF Criteria. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials, no specific bridging LRT modality is recommended over another for treating patients on the waiting list, however each modality has unique and patient-specific advantages. Pre-transplant LRT use in the United States has increased dramatically over the last two decades with more than 50% of the currently listed patients receiving LRT Freeman et al. (2008) . Despite these national trends, significant differences in LRT utilization, referral patterns, recurrence rates and survival have been observed among UNOS regions, socioeconomic levels and races. The use of LRT as a biologic selection tool based on response to treatment has shown promising results in its ability to predict successful post-transplant outcomes.

Poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial chemoembolization pre-transplantation: Retrospective analysis

AIM: To investigate whether transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) before liver transplantation (LT) improves long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among 204 patients with HCC who received LT from January 2002 to December 2010 in PLA General Hospital. Among them, 88 patients received TACE before LT. Prognostic factors of serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, disease-free survival time, survival time with tumor, number of tumor nodules, tumor size, tumor number, presence of blood vessels and bile duct invasion, lymph node metastasis, degree of tumor differentiation, and preoperative liver function were determined in accordance with the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (Child) classification and model for end-stage liver disease. We also determined time of TACE before transplant surgery and tumor recurrence and metastasis according to different organs. Cumulative survival rate and disease-free survival rate curves were prepared using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank and χ² tests were used for comparisons.

RESULTS: In patients with and without TACE before LT, the 1, 3 and 5-year cumulative survival rate was 70.5% ± 4.9% vs 91.4% ± 2.6%, 53.3% ± 6.0% vs 83.1% ± 3.9%, and 46.2% ± 7.0% vs 80.8% ± 4.5%, respectively. The median survival time of patients with and without TACE was 51.857 ± 5.042 mo vs 80.930 ± 3.308 mo (χ² = 22.547, P < 0.001, P < 0.05). The 1, 3 and 5-year disease-free survival rates for patients with and without TACE before LT were 62.3% ± 5.2% vs 98.9% ± 3.0%, 48.7% ± 6.7% vs 82.1% ± 4.1%, and 48.7% ± 6.7% vs 82.1% ± 4.1%, respectively. The median survival time of patients with and without TACE before LT was 50.386 ± 4.901 mo vs 80.281 ± 3.216 mo (χ² = 22.063, P < 0.001, P < 0.05). TACE before LT can easily lead to pulmonary or distant metastasis of the primary tumor. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups, the chance of metastasis of the primary tumor in the group with TACE was significantly higher than that of the group without TACE.

CONCLUSION: TACE pre-LT for HCC patients increased the chances of pulmonary or distant metastasis of the primary tumor, thus reducing the long-term survival rate.

Standing the test of time: outcomes of a decade of prioritizing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, results of the UNOS natural geographic experiment

Priority is given to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to receive liver transplants, potentially causing significant regional disparities in organ access and possibly outcomes in this population. Our aim was to assess these disparities by comparing outcomes in long waiting time regions (LWTR, regions 5 and 9) and short waiting time regions (SWTR regions 3 and 10) by analyzing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We analyzed 6,160 HCC patients who received exception points in regions 3, 5, 9, and 10 from 2002 to 2012. Data from regions 5 and 9 were combined and compared to data from regions 3 and 10. Survival was studied in three patient cohorts: an intent-to-treat cohort, a posttransplant cohort, and a cohort examining overall survival in transplanted patients only (survival from listing to last posttransplant follow-up). Multivariate analysis and log-rank testing were used to analyze the data. Median time on the list in the LWTR was 7.6 months compared to 1.6 months for SWTR, with a significantly higher incidence of death on the waiting list in LWTR than in SWTR (8.4% versus 1.6%, P < 0.0001). Patients in the LWTR were more likely to receive loco-regional therapy, to have T3 tumors at listing, and to receive expanded-criteria donor (ECD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts than patients in the SWTR (P < 0.0001 for all). Survival was significantly better in the LWTR compared to the SWTR in all three cohorts (P < 0.0001 for all three survival points). Being listed/transplanted in an SWTR was an independent predictor of poor patient survival on multivariate analysis (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 1.545, 95% confidence interval 1.375-1.736).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that expediting patients with HCC to transplant at too fast a rate may adversely affect patient outcomes.

Current status of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide. A multi-disciplinary approach is required for its management. Screening high-risk patients allows for earlier diagnosis and the use of potentially curative therapies. Current recommendations for HCC screening for patients with cirrhosis are an abdominal ultrasound and serum alpha fetoprotein level every 6 to 12 months. Treatment choice depends on tumor stage, liver function and the patient's overall functional status. Curative therapies include surgical resection, liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Surgical resection, either primary resection or LT, is the treatment most likely to result in cure of HCC. Which option to pursue is based on multiple factors. LT has the potential benefit of treating both HCC and the underlying cirrhosis; however, long wait times incur the risk of tumor progression. Firm recommendations regarding the role of living donor LT for HCC are not yet possible because of conflicting data. HCC recurrence after LT is 8-11% and several adjuvant therapies have been investigated to reduce this. Bridging therapy and tumor downsizing are techniques that also may be considered to deal with long waiting periods and qualification for LT, respectively. If neither LT nor primary resection is possible, loco-regional therapies such as RFA and TACE should be considered. Systemic chemotherapies have proved disappointing for the treatment of HCC; however, newer targeted therapies such as sorafenib and cetuximab have provided new hope for the future.

[Influence of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation on post transplant tumor recurrence and survival]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) and its influence on survival and tumor recurrence in patients transplanted for HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 67 liver transplant patients with a preoperative diagnosis of HCC and pathological confirmation in the native liver between January 2000 and October 2007. Treatment before LT was performed in 46 (68.7%) patients [radiofrequency ablation in 18, transarterial chemoembolization in 31 and percutaneous ethanol injection in two].

RESULTS

The median time between inclusion on the waiting list and LT was 4 months and was similar in treated and untreated patients. The median time between pre-transplantation locoregional therapy and LT was less than 6 months in 65.2% of the patients. Treated patients had better liver function (Child A 52.2 vs 19%; Child B 39.1 vs 33.3%; Child C 8.7 vs. 47.6%; p=0.001) and a higher proportion of total tumor size > 3 cm (59.1% vs 30%; p=0.031). Total tumor necrosis was observed in 26.1% of the patients, with no differences according to treatment modality or tumor size. Tumor recurrence occurred in six patients (9%). The median time between LT and tumor recurrence was 26.5 months with a subsequent median survival of 6.6 months. Overall survival was 83.5%, 69.9% and 59.5%, and tumor recurrence-free survival was 83.5%, 68.3% and 58% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Previous HCC treatment showed no influence on survival or tumor recurrence. Likewise, the grade of tumor necrosis was unrelated to overall survival or the probability of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of HCC before LT in patients with a waiting list time of less than 6 months does not appear to influence survival or tumor recurrence.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to perform a retrospective analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) before undergoing liver transplantation at our institution.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to August 2005, 56 patients with HCC underwent TACE before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Radiologic findings before and after TACE were assessed and correlated with histologic findings after OLT. The area of induced necrosis was pathologically evaluated in each HCC nodule.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one HCC nodules were detected at histologic study. One hundred seventeen HCC nodules (91.4%) were hyperenhancing in the arterial phase on the preoperative imaging studies. The percentage of tumor necrosis was greater than 90% in 48 nodules (38%), between 50% and 90% in 19 nodules (15%), and less than 50% in 61 nodules (48%); tumor necrosis data were not recorded for the remaining three nodules. The size of the preoperatively detected lesions ranged from 0.2 to 9 cm (mean, 2.58 cm). The mean percentage of tumor necrosis was 67.8% in this group, but it rose to 79.2% in the hypervascular lesions. The size of the nodules that were not detected preoperatively ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 cm (mean, 0.68 cm), and the mean percentage of tumor necrosis was only 1.57%.

CONCLUSION

TACE is a safe treatment in well-selected patients. Its antitumoral effect is high in hypervascular lesions (mean necrosis, 79.2%). It provides good local control in preoperatively diagnosed HCC (mean necrosis, 67.8%), but its impact is limited in lesions not detected preoperatively (mean necrosis, 1.57%).

Treatment before liver transplantation for HCC

Liver transplantation (LT) which is currently an established therapy for sma1l, early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis requires in most cases long waiting period. Tumor development during the waiting period may be associated with vascular invasion which is a strong factor of postoperative recurrence. Therefore, local treatment of the tumor including trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) or partial liver resection can be used before transplantation. In the present paper we reviewed the efficacy of these treatments prior to LT. Although, TACE induced complete tumor necrosis in some patients there is no convincing arguments showing that this treatment reduces the rate of drop out before LT, nor improves the survival after LT. Although, RF can induce complete necrosis in the majority of small tumors (<2.5 cm), there is no data demonstrating that this treatment reduce the rate of drop out before LT, nor improves the survival after LT. It has been showed that both short and long term survival after LT was not compromised by previous partial liver resection of HCC. However, there is no data demonstrating that liver resection before LT, which can be used either as a bridge treatment or as a primary treatment, improves the survival after LT. The current data suggest that there is no role for pre-transplant therapy for HCC within Milano criteria transplanted within six months. On the opposite, if the waiting time is predicted to be prolonged, the risk of tumor progression and either drop-off from the list or interval dissemination with post-transplant tumor recurrence is recognized. In this setting, bridge therapy can reduce that risk but its efficacy has to be determined.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemic and treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a worldwide epidemic. Survival rates are poor; however, oncologists are able to offer regional therapies to those patients who present with early disease. Prevention through vaccination remains a mainstay of this epidemic. New staging systems that incorporate important information about tumor characteristics and liver disease improve our ability to prognosticate and treat these patients.

A primer on transarterial, chemical, and thermal ablative therapies for hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative approach for patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors. Unfortunately, most patients with hepatic malignancy are precluded from resection due to multifocal disease, anatomic limitations, inadequate functional liver reserve, extrahepatic metastases, or medical comorbidities. Consequently, several methods of tumor ablation have been developed as alternate treatment strategies for patients with unresectable hepatic tumors or as adjuncts in total cancer therapy. The purpose of this review is to inclusively define the various ablation modalities available (transarterial, chemical, and thermal ablative), and to describe the procedures, general applications, and reported outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE and CINAHL search of the English-language literature was performed on transarterial, chemical, and thermal ablative therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Presently, radiofrequency thermal ablation is the most widely applicable liver-directed modality for hepatic tumor ablation, enabling treatment of primary and metastatic tumors. However, other transarterial and thermoablative techniques are available with accumulating data for their use. Lacking at present are studies that define the role and potential benefit of the various liver-directed modalities in the treatment algorithm for hepatic tumors.

The best candidates for transarterial chemotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: a cohort-based characterization of dropout times

BACKGROUND

Although transarterial chemotherapy is used to retard tumour progression for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), information regarding the acceptable waiting time and appropriate patient selection for the therapy is lacking.

AIM

To examine dropout times and determine the best candidates for pre-transplant transarterial therapy in a cohort study.

METHODS

In total, 180 consecutive HCC candidates receiving pre-transplant chemo-lipiodolization were included in the study.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 (38.9%) patients dropped off the waiting list during the median follow-up of 19 months. According to the Child-Pugh (C-P) classification, the estimated dropout rates at 1 and 2 years were 17.2% and 44.8% for the C-P A group and 33.4% and 81.3% for the C-P B/C group, respectively. C-P B/C patients experienced more frequent dropouts than C-P A patients (P < 0.001). Risk factor analysis identified C-P classification to be the strongest predictor of dropout (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >100 ng/mL, tumour size >3 cm and multiple nodules remained independently predictive of dropout for C-P A group (all P < 0.05). Candidates with none of these factors were found to be at the lowest risk of dropout, with only a 22.5% dropout rate up to 41 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that Child-Pugh A patients with one nodule <3 cm and AFP < 100 ng/mL may be the best candidates for pre-transplant chemo-lipiodolization, with the lowest dropout rate. However, comparative studies with other therapeutic options are needed to assess the definitive role of transarterial therapy in this setting.

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with 26 HCC nodules (range, 0.8-5 cm; mean, 1.96 cm) and decompensated liver cirrhosis (mean Child score, 10.7) were treated with radiofrequency ablation using cooled-tip electrodes and a 200-W generator. Radiofrequency ablation was performed under the guidance of sonography or CT. Procedure-related complications, therapeutic efficacy, each patient's survival, changes in blood test results--that is, serum aminotransferase and bilirubin--and changes in the Child score before and after ablation therapy were analyzed. To assess the therapeutic response of the tumor to radiofrequency ablation, we performed contrast-enhanced CT after the procedure and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Complete necrosis without marginal recurrence at the 6-month follow-up was attained in 23 lesions (88.5%). During follow-up (mean, 13.3 months), one patient experienced a remote tumor recurrence in the liver. The median survival time was 12.0 +/- 1.7 months. Two patients died of liver failure--one at 2 months and one at 4 months after treatment. The other patients were followed for at least 6 months (range, 6-28 months; mean, 12 months). The first and second weeks after therapy, the serum aminotransferase and bilirubin levels were significantly higher than were pretreatment levels (p < 0.05). However, 3 weeks after therapy, those figures were nearly restored to the pretreatment levels. The mean Child scores 3 weeks after radiofrequency ablation (10.8) were similar to those before treatment (10.7).

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation can be used selectively for treatment of HCC in patients with decompensated cirrhosis but has the potential to aggravate the preexisting hepatic dysfunction.

Comparison of two techniques of transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

Supraselective transarterial chemoembolization (STACE) more efficiently targets chemotherapy delivered via the feeding arterial branches of the tumor than does conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, the hypothesis of its greater efficacy compared with the latter is subject to controversy. The aim of the present study was to compare STACE to conventional TACE in a controlled study of candidates for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients were matched for factors associated with HCC recurrence and survival. Sixty patients were included: 30 who were treated with STACE and 30 treated with conventional TACE. The 2 groups were similar in terms of matched criteria. In the overall population (uni- and multinodular HCC), there was no marked difference between the 2 groups in 5-year disease-free survival: 76.8% vs. 74.8%. In sensitivity analysis of patients considered to be the best candidates for TACE (uninodular HCC < or =5 cm), there was a trend toward significance between STACE and TACE in 5-year disease-free survival: 87% vs. 64% (P = 0.09). The only factor associated with complete tumor necrosis was STACE in the overall population (30.8% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.02), with a similar trend in the subgroup of patients with a single nodule (33.3% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.06), whereas the mean number of procedures was similar in the 2 groups (mean, 1.3 procedures; range 1-5 procedures; P = NS). STACE is more efficient at inducing complete tumor necrosis in the liver. This study observed trends toward improvement in the disease-free survival of patients with uninodular HCC < or =5 cm. Future studies focusing on such patients are warranted.

Response to preoperative chemoembolization correlates with outcome after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be cured by liver transplantation (LT). However, many patients drop out during the waiting time as a result of tumor progression. We prospectively investigated the effect of transarterial chemoembolization on long-term survival of 116 patients with HCC listed for LT. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that patients with either complete or partial response to therapy (no vital tumor or devascularization of > or =30%, respectively) as assessed by computed tomographic scan before LT had far better 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates (100, 93.2, and 85.7%; and 93.8, 83.6, and 66.2%, respectively) compared with those with no response or with tumor progression (82.4, 50.7, and 19.3%). Posttransplant survival analysis showed a marked survival benefit according to transarterial chemoembolization response: patients with complete or partial response had 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of 89.1, 85.1, and 85.1%, and 88.6, 77.4, and 63.9%, respectively, compared with 68.6, 51.4, and 51.4% for patients whose disease did not respond to therapy. Subgroup analysis, however, showed that these benefits were only seen in patients whose disease met the Milan criteria, but not in disease exceeding the Milan criteria but fitting the expanded University of California at San Francisco criteria. These patients were also more likely to drop out as a result of tumor progression while waiting for LT (dropout rate 12.1 vs. 2.9%) and to develop recurrent HCC (21.6 vs. 7.6%). Downstaged patients did even worse, with a dropout rate of 26.7% and a 5-year survival rate of only 25%. In conclusion, the response to preoperative chemoembolization may predict long-term outcome after LT.

Transarterial chemoembolization as a bridge to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis

The aim of this review was to assess the impact of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a neoadjuvant therapy prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An electronic search on the Medline database (1990-2005) was used to identify relevant articles. The studies were reviewed and ranked according to their quality of evidence using the grading system proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. As a bridge to OLT, pretransplant TACE does not improve long-term survival (grade C). There is currently no convincing evidence that TACE allows to expand the current selection criteria for OLT, nor that TACE decreases dropout rates on the waiting list (grade C). However, TACE does not increase the risk for postoperative complications (grade C). There is insufficient evidence that TACE offers any benefit when used prior to OLT, neither for early nor for advanced HCC. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to define the role of TACE in OLT patients.

Pre-liver transplantation locoregional adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma as a strategy to improve longterm survival

BACKGROUND

Preorthotopic liver transplantation locoregional therapy (LRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) reduces drop-out rates in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study, we investigated the efficacy of LRT as a strategy to improve longterm survival after transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data identified 100 patients with HCC who underwent OLT between 1985 and 2005. Of these, 46 received LRT in the form of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or a combination of these.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals, regardless of LRT, were 81.3%, 66.1%, and 61.3%, respectively. Demographic data and waiting time for OLT were similar between LRT and untreated groups. Pre-OLT radiologic stage was comparable (LRT: 2.11 +/- 0.74 versus Untreated: 2.39 +/- 0.94; p = 0.16). At the time of transplantation, the LRT group had notable tumor downstaging (1.50 +/- 1.34 versus 2.49 +/- 1.17; p = 0.008). The LRT group had better 5-year survival (82.4% versus 51.8%; p = 0.01), but this improvement was observed in patients with HCC stages II, III, and IV (77.6% versus 37.4%; p = 0.016). Sixteen LRT patients, and none untreated, revealed complete tumor necrosis with no viable tumor cells on explant pathology (pT0). These patients did not experience any longterm recurrence, in contrast to those with similar pre-OLT tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

OLT is a viable treatment option for primary HCC. LRT substantially downstages the primary tumor and improves longterm survival in patients with advanced disease. Complete tumor necrosis with LRT is associated with excellent longterm recurrence-free survival.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is there Evidence for Expanding the Selection Criteria?

A consequent application of the Milan criteria in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may lead to excellent long-term survival and a low incidence of recurrence. Expanding the selection criteria will result in more patients with hepatocellular carcinoma being potentially curative treated, but this approach is associated with at least a higher incidence of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 110 patients, who underwent liver transplantation for HCC in our institution between 1987 and 2004, showed a significant improvement in patient survival with time. A change in criteria for patient selection may have contributed to the improved outcome. In 28 of 110 patients a recurrence of HCC was observed. In 82% of patients, who developed recurrence of carcinoma, the Milan criteria were not met. Dropout from the waiting list is common and several methods, including percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, and chemoembolization, are used to prevent tumor progression and thus prevent dropout. As no randomized trials are available some uncertainty remains, whether these neoadjuvant procedures improve outcome. At present, there is no evidence that this approach enables expansion of the selection criteria. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major indication for living related liver transplantation because the risk of dropout while waiting is negligible. Extension of the Milan criteria in the setting of living related liver transplantation may offer more patients a potentially curative treatment, without reducing the donor pool of organs for other patients on the waiting list with nonmalignant liver disease.

Impact of pretransplantation transarterial chemoembolization on survival and recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The actual impact of transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on patient survival and HCC recurrence is not known. Between 1985 and 1998, 479 patients with HCC in 14 French centers were evaluated for LT. Among these 479 patients, this case-control study included 100 patients who received transarterial chemoembolization before LT (TACE group) and 100 control patients who did not receive chemoembolization (no-TACE group). Patients and controls were matched for the pre-LT tumor characteristics, the period of transplantation, the time spent on the waiting list, and pre- and posttransplantation treatments. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated 5 years after LT and were compared with the log-rank test. The mean waiting time before LT was 4.2 +/- 3.2 months in the TACE group and 4.3 +/- 4.4 months in the no-TACE group. The median number of TACE procedures was 1 (range: 1-12). Demographic data, median alpha-fetoprotein level (21.6 ng/mL and 22.0 ng/mL, respectively), and pre- and post-LT morphologic characteristics of the tumors did not differ in the TACE and no-TACE groups. Overall 5-year survival was 59.4% with TACE and 59.3% without TACE (ns). Survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups with respect to the time on the waiting list, the tumor diameter, or the type of TACE (selective or nonselective). In the TACE group, 30 patients had tumor necrosis > or =80% on the liver explant with a 5-year survival rate of 63.2%, compared with 54.2% among their matched controls (P = 0.9). In conclusion, with a mean waiting period of 4.2 months and 1 TACE procedure, pre-LT TACE does not influence post-LT overall survival and disease-free survival.

The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

No prior studies have shown that pre-operative loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improves survival following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We performed subgroup analyses according to pathologic HCC stage among 168 patients who underwent OLT to test the hypothesis that pre-operative loco-regional therapy confers a survival advantage in a subgroup at intermediate risk for HCC recurrence. Patients with pathologic T3 HCC meeting the proposed UCSF expanded criteria (single lesion not exceeding 6.5 cm or two to three lesions none > 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter within 8 cm) had a similar 5-year recurrence-free survival as patients with pathologic T2 HCC (88.5% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.56). In the subgroup with pathologic T2 or T3 HCC, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 93.8% for the 85 patients who received pre-operative loco-regional therapy, versus 80.6% for the other 41 patients without treatment (p = 0.049). The treatment benefit, according to 5-year recurrence-free survival, appeared greater for pathologic T3 (85.9% vs. 51.4%; p = 0.05) than T2 HCC (96.4% versus 87.1%; p = 0.12). In conclusion, although the lack of a randomized controlled design precludes drawing firm conclusions, our results suggest that pre-operative loco-regional therapy may confer a survival benefit after OLT in the subgroup with pathologic T2 and T3 HCC.

Brain metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma detected after liver transplantation

AIM

We report the case of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma submitted to liver transplantation, who subsequently manifested tumor recurrence initially as brain metastasis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 48-year-old male cirrhotic patient with hepatitis C infection, and two focal hepatic lesions, had a cytologic and histologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Before transplant, he was submitted to adjuvant treatment with a combination of arterial embolization and intratumoral ethanol injection. In the 3rd month post-liver transplantation, the patient developed headache, nausea and vomiting, without any neurological impairment. Brain computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging identified an expansive hypervascular lesion with internal bleeding. Evaluation of the surgical explant revealed macroscopic invasion of portal vessels.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastasis of a hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation may occur. This metastasis may have occurred before or soon after the transplant. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, awaiting liver transplant, should be screened for cerebral metastasis. Vascular invasion may indicate hematogenic dissemination of the tumor.

Diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinomas are aggressive tumors with a high dissemination power. An early diagnosis of these tumors is of great importance in order to offer the possibility of curative treatment. For an early diagnosis, abdominal ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein determinations at 6-month intervals are suggested for all patients with cirrhosis of the liver, since this disease is considered to be the main risk factor for the development of the neoplasia. Helicoidal computed tomography, magnetic resonance and/or hepatic arteriography are suggested for diagnostic confirmation and tumor staging. The need to obtain a fragment of the focal lesion for cytology and/or histology for a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma depends on the inability of imaging methods to diagnose the lesion. Several classifications are currently available for tumor staging in order to determine patient prognosis. All take into consideration not only the stage of the tumor but also the degree of hepatocellular dysfunction, which is known to be the main factor related to patient survival. Classifications, however, fail to correlate treatment with prognosis and cannot suggest the ideal treatment for each tumor stage. The Barcelona Classification (BCLC) attempts to correlate tumor stage with treatment but requires prospective studies for validation. For single tumors smaller than 5 cm or up to three nodules smaller than 3 cm, surgical resection, liver transplantation and percutaneous treatment may offer good anti-tumoral results, as well as improved patient survival. Embolization or chemoembolization are therapeutic alternatives for patients who do not benefit from curative therapies.

Experiences in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Beside surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is not only effective but also the only potentially curable treatment in selected cases of small tumors. We report our experience in 11 male patients transplanted for HCC from August 1998 to July 2002. Selection criteria for OLT were unresectability of the hepatic tumor and severity of the underlying liver disease. The tumor diagnosis was confirmed by histology, imaging techniques, and tumor markers. All patients received an orthotopic liver allograft using a modified piggyback technique. Six of the 11 patients are alive; one died due to acute rejection and four died from recurrent disease. In all four patients with recurrent disease, vascular invasion was shown histologically, whereas only one patient without evidence of recurrence showed vascular invasion. To prevent recurrence after OLT the immunosuppressive regime was adjusted to the underlying disease by early cessation of prednisolone and reduction in the long-term exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. Patients were screened for recurrence by ultrasound and computed tomography. Recurrent HCC were treated symptomatically. OLT is an effective treatment for subgroups of patients with HCC. It might be possible to downstage the liver tumor by chemoembolization and/or radiofrequency ablation and allow the patients to wait for a suitable donor. After OLT the early withdrawal of prednisolone and the reduction of other immunosuppression is feasible. In conclusion, OLT can be a potentially curative therapy for HCC.

Role of liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignant disorders

The role of liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignant disorders remains controversial and will remain so until several crucial issues are resolved, the main difficulty being the shortage of organ donors. Furthermore, a consensus needs to be reached within the transplantation community on the tumour stage at which each disorder is too advanced to be salvaged by liver transplantation. Despite these limitations, there are generally accepted criteria that define when transplantation can, and should, be offered for hepatobiliary malignant disorders.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: lessons from the first year under the Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) organ allocation policy

We examined the impact of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) organ allocation scheme on 44 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between February 2002 and January 2003, and compared the outcome with 58 patients listed in the 4 years before MELD implementation. Patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier probabilities for OLT at 3, 6, and up to 8.5 months were 22.5%, 64.0%, and 88.0%, respectively, under MELD versus 17.2%, 24.7%, and 35.8% at 3, 6 and 9 months, respectively, in the pre-MELD group (P =.0006). In Cox regression analysis, non-O blood group (hazard ratio 2.5; P =.047 versus blood group O) and 3 tumor nodules (hazard ratio 5.5; P =.005) were associated with a significantly higher probability for OLT under MELD. The probabilities of dropout were 5.6% at 6 and 8.5 months under MELD versus 7.2% and 37.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, in the pre-MELD group (P =.74). The lack of a significant difference in dropout may be due to low dropout rates in the first 6 months in either group. No HCC was found in the explant in 1 patient from each group. In conclusion, the HCC-adjusted MELD system significantly improved the probability of timely OLT, albeit a significant disadvantage for blood group O was evident. Compared with preliminary UNOS data, in which 90% of patients with HCC have received OLT within 3 months, our results reflect the wide regional variation in the impact of MELD.

Drop-out rates of patients with hepatocellular cancer listed for liver transplantation: outcome with chemoembolization

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are assigned model for end stage liver disease (MELD) scores to provide access to liver transplantation (LT). An equitable policy would equate HCC progression beyond acceptable transplantation criteria with death on the waiting list. However, limited information is available regarding this issue. Thus, our aim was to analyze drop-out rates on the waiting list for patients with HCC. Between January 1994 and August 2001, 54 patients with HCC were listed for LT. Patients underwent chemoembolization prior to LT, and were assessed every three months for disease progression until LT. Two patients were stage T1, 45 patients were stage T2, and 7 patients were stage T3 at time of first chemoembolization. Median time was 211 days (range 28-1099 days) for patients that were eventually transplanted. Eight patients were removed from the list. Cumulative probability of drop out on the waiting list, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, was 15% and 25% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in age, gender, initial tumor stage, or serum AFP levels in those who eventually underwent LT vs. those who dropped out. In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemoembolization for patients with HCC has a drop-out rate of 15% over 6 months.

Chemoembolization in the Management of Liver Tumors

The dual vascular supply of the liver affords a unique opportunity to explore intraarterial therapies for hepatic malignancies. Chemoembolization is a well-established technique combining intra-arterial chemotherapy with delivery of embolic agents in order to achieve an antitumor effect due to a high local concentration and prolonged dwell time of the drug, along with select ischemia. Many tumors, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and neuroendocrine tumors, cause symptoms and death by local growth and destruction of the liver. While there are other methods capable of controlling small or isolated hepatic neoplasms, none are suitable for the majority of these patients. Chemoembolization can produce significant results in terms of tumor shrinkage in many of these patients, and there are studies to suggest a survival advantage in hepatocellular carcinoma. Toxicity, however, may be substantial, and patient selection is crucial in order to achieve the optimal benefit of this powerful technique for individual populations.

A follow-up analysis of the pattern and predictors of dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the current organ allocation policy

Since our interim report of the intention-to-treat outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we have performed a follow-up analysis of an expanded cohort of 70 patients to further assess whether the observed pattern and predictors of dropout are consistent with the rationale behind current HCC-adjusted Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) organ allocation scheme. All except one patient had pretransplantation staging meeting our proposed expanded criteria-a single lesion < or =6.5 cm, or three or fewer lesions none >4.5 cm and total tumor diameter < or =8 cm. Thirty-eight patients received OLT. The cumulative probabilities of dropout at 6, 12, and 18 months were 7.2%, 37.8%, and 55.1%, respectively. The respective dropout probabilities would have been 11.0%, 57.4%, and 68.7% if the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria for exclusion (single lesion < or =5 cm or three or fewer lesions none >3 cm) were applied. Predictors of dropout with either criteria included three tumor nodules and a single lesion >3 cm at initial presentation, whereas preoperative chemoembolization or ablation therapies were associated with a lower risk for dropout only when applying the UNOS criteria for patient exclusion. In the subgroup with two or three lesions or a solitary tumor >3 cm, the cumulative probabilities of dropout were nine-fold higher than those with a single lesion < or =3 cm (P =.004). In conclusion, the low dropout rate in the first 6 months and the differing dropout risks based on tumor characteristics support further refinements in the HCC-adjusted MELD organ allocation scheme.

Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been considered the best treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of a steadily increasing waiting time, a noteworthy proportion of patients are excluded from OLT because of tumor progression. A 20% and more dropout rate from the waiting list has recently been reported. In this prospective study, we evaluated the effect of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on preventing tumor progression while on the waiting list in patients meeting current selection criteria (solitary lesion < or = 5 cm, three lesions < or = 3 cm). In addition, we analyzed the outcome of a separate group of patients with advanced-stage HCC outside the selection criteria but with at least 50% tumor reduction after TACE (downstaging) to expand current criteria. Forty-eight patients met the selection criteria and were eligible for this study. Seven patients are still on the waiting list; 41 underwent OLT. None of these patients had to be removed from the list because of tumor progression after a mean waiting time of 178 days (23 patients > or =180 days). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year intention-to-treat survival was 98%, 98%, and 94%. The outcome after OLT was also excellent with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of 98%, 98%, and 93%. Tumor recurrence occurred only in 1 patient (2.4%). Fifteen patients with advanced-stage HCC were included in this study. Three developed a tumor progression and had to be removed from the list (20% dropout rate). Despite tumor reduction before OLT, these patients had a significantly less favorable outcome in the intention-to-treat analysis as well as in the posttransplantation survival. Tumor recurrence was seen in 30% of patients after OLT. In conclusion, TACE followed by OLT is associated with an excellent outcome in selected patients. Furthermore, TACE is highly efficacious in preventing tumor progression while waiting for OLT. Although TACE reduced tumor preoperatively, it failed to show a beneficial effect on patient survival in advanced-stage HCCs.

Indications and limitations of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, yet remains difficult to treat, with dismal overall long-term survival rates. Recent strategies using liver transplantation for carefully selected patients with stage I and II HCC and cirrhosis have shown promising results, with 5-year survival rates comparable to survival rates for transplantation patients without malignancy. Currently, however, limited resources and a severe organ shortage make liver transplantation an option for only a limited number of patients with HCC in the United States. Future studies must document the long-term success of this therapy and improve methods for disease control before and after transplantation.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list

A major obstacle for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is tumor growth resulting in dropout from the waiting list for OLT. There is a paucity of data on survival according to intention-to-treat analysis and the rate of dropout from the waiting list for OLT among patients with HCC. To further evaluate these issues, we analyzed the outcome of 46 consecutive patients with HCC listed for OLT between January 1998 and January 2001. Exclusion criteria for OLT were tumor size greater than 5 cm for one to three lesions or four lesions or greater of any size. Twenty-one patients underwent OLT. There were 11 dropouts because of tumor progression and six deaths, including three deaths after dropout. Kaplan-Meier 1- and 2-year intention-to-treat survival rates were 91.7% and 72.6%, respectively. Monthly dropout rates were 0% from 0 to 3 months, 1.5% from 3 to 6 months, 1.0% from 6 to 9 months, 4.9% from 9 to 12 months, and 5.6% from 12 to 15 months. One dropout occurred beyond 15 months among 4 patients remaining at risk. Cumulative probabilities for dropout at 6, 12, and 24 months were 7.3%, 25.3%, and 43.6%, respectively. Predictors for dropout included two or three tumor nodules or a solitary lesion greater than 3 cm at initial presentation and previous hepatic resection. Our results support recent changes in the scheme of organ allocation aimed at reducing the dropout rate and improving outcome for patients with HCC awaiting OLT.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most frequent primary malignancy of the liver and appears to be rising in incidence in the United States and other developed western countries. Imaging studies play a key role in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, and more and more commonly, patients are being diagnosed at an asymptomatic stage. The use of triphasic computed tomography scanning and improved magnetic resonance imaging equipment and protocols has led to greater sensitivity and specificity for these techniques in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Accurate staging of hepatocellular carcinoma is important in determining prognosis and in helping decide the best treatment for each patient. No one staging system appears optimal, but important factors to be considered are the size of the tumor, severity of underlying liver disease, and the functional status of the patient. Liver transplantation has grown in importance as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma but may be limited by availability of donor organs and long waiting times. This situation may be improved by greater use of living donor liver transplantation. Hepatic resection remains an important treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly in the absence of cirrhosis. Tumor ablation by alcohol injection or radiofrequency ablation is associated with favorable outcomes and may be considered a potentially curative treatment. Early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma remains a key goal in improving the poor prognosis of this form of liver cancer. Identifying hepatocellular carcinoma at an early stage is often associated with having better treatment options for patients with small, asymptomatic tumors.

[Coadjuvant combined treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation]

The aim of this study was to report the antitumor effect of combination therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. We studied 3 cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma > 3 cm and < 8 cm who underwent transarterial embolization and percutaneous ethanol injection as combination coadjuvant therapy while on the waiting list for liver transplantation. Transarterial embolization failed to produce total necrosis of the tumor. In all 3 patients this was subsequently achieved with percutaneous ethanol injection. All the patients currently remain on the waiting list and show no signs of local tumor recurrence 9, 10 and 13 months after the procedures. In conclusion, combination adjuvant therapy with transarterial embolization and percutaneous ethanol injection can increase tumor necrosis and can be useful prior to liver transplantation. Further studies with a greater number of patients are required to confirm the value of this combination therapy.

Practical management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the ten commonest tumours in the world and occurs mainly in patients with cirrhosis. To date, in Western countries, curative treatment options include partial liver resection or liver transplantation in selected patients with small tumours. Unfortunately, most patients are detected with non-resectable or non-transplantable HCC due to disease extension, hepatic dysfunction or comorbid factors. These patients may benefit from local ablative therapy, such as percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation, with curative intent in patients with small tumours. In advanced HCC chemoembolization has a high response rate, but there is no clear evidence of a survival benefit. In this review we discuss practical considerations in the treatment of HCC and propose an algorithm for the selection of different treatment modalities.

Nonsurgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Given the poor prognosis of HCC and the therapeutic challenge posed by underlying liver cirrhosis, efforts and resources must be directed towards preventive strategies. Return on the investment in such research is likely to be greater than can be expected from treatment of advanced disease.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is feasible, particularly in patients known to be at risk from chronic hepatitis and chronic liver disease. The optimal surveillance strategy is unknown. HCC usually presents as an incurable disease even when detected on surveillance. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice, but the coexistence of chronic liver disease and the insidious nature of HCC make it unresectable in most patients. Orthotopic liver transplantation for selected patients or ablative techniques may offer an opportunity to render patients disease-free even if the tumor is unresectable. There are numerous therapies offered to patients with unresectable HCC, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and regional intra-arterial treatments. While potentially palliative, none of these approaches has been demonstrated to prolong survival in these patients. If possible, the treatment of patients with HCC should be done on clinical trials.

Surgery and transplantation for hepatocellular cancer

1. Curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) depends on early diagnosis. 2. The cure rate for operable HCC occurring in the absence of cirrhosis is only 10% to 25%. 3. Features of HCC in patients with cirrhosis that are associated with a 5-year survival rate of 75% after liver transplantation include (1) solitary tumor less than 5 cm; (2) 3 or fewer tumors, each less than 3 cm; and (3) absence of vascular invasion. 4. Advanced cirrhosis limits the widespread application of partial hepatectomy to patients with HCC. 5. Neoadjuvant therapy has not yet been proven to improve patient outcome for early-stage HCC that is promptly treated by transplantation.

The current status of liver transplantation for primary hepatic malignancy

Several advances have been achieved during the last years in the management of patients with liver cancer. The refinement of the imaging techniques and the better knowledge of the biology of this neoplasm have facilitated the establishment of useful criteria to select patients for transplantation. Following a strict selection policy (solitary tumors < or = 5 cm or up to 3 foci each one < or = 3 cm) patients with liver cancer may achieve the same survival as nonneoplastic subjects. Currently, the main problem is how to diminish the risk of tumor progression while waiting for a liver. Although at present the benefits of invasive treatments are ill-defined, the ongoing studies exploring new treatment options hopefully will succeed in preventing this complication and further improve the current results.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease that is extremely difficult to manage and is increasing markedly in incidence. This presents both an opportunity and a challenge. At-risk patients can be identified and early detection of HCC is feasible. New surgical techniques and postoperative therapies, including hepatic intra-arterial radiation, may improve the outlook for some patients with resectable cancer. Unfortunately, the vast majority of patients with HCC will have unresectable cancers. Regional treatments may shrink or necrose tumors, but no clear benefit to such therapies has been demonstrated. Recent evidence suggests combination chemotherapy may help some patients, although this needs validation. Perhaps the best hope is that the further elucidation of the genetic and molecular features of HCC will lend us insight into innovative strategies to manage this difficult cancer.

Sensitivity of commonly available screening tests in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Recognition of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important in the management of patients awaiting liver transplantation. HCCs >5 cm in diameter are at high risk to recur after transplant. The goal of this study was to assess the sensitivity of the diagnostic tests employed in a pretransplant screening program.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of charts of 106 consecutive adults transplanted over a 1-yr period. All patients had ultrasonography (US), computerized tomography (CT), and serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) testing within 6 months of transplantation. Radiographic reports were subdivided into low-risk and high-risk groups, based upon level of suspicion for HCC. The results were compared to explant pathology.

RESULTS

Pathological analysis of 106 explants revealed HCC in 19 patients. High-risk US exams had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.69 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.91 in the diagnosis of HCC. High-risk CT exams had a PPV of 0.67 and an NPV of 0.90. When patients had either a high-risk US or a high-risk CT, there was a PPV of 0.59 and an NPV of 0.83. Of the 19 patients with HCC, three had high-risk US and low-risk CT; two had high-risk CT and low-risk US. Four patients, all with HCC <4 cm, had low-risk US, CT, and serum AFP.

CONCLUSIONS

US, CT, and serum AFP, as single tests, are insensitive for detection of HCC in the cirrhotic liver. However, they are highly specific. Sensitivity and specificity for US are comparable to those for CT. Given its lower cost, US is preferable to CT for routine screening of HCC in patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

This article presents a review of the literature regarding the use of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There have been two different approaches to the treatment: (a) percutaneous tumor ablation methods which can be divided into injectable and thermal methods; percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) is the most widely used method, and (b) TACE. PEI is the treatment of choice for single HCCs smaller or equal to 3 cm in size. For patients with large HCCs combined TACE and PEI is probably the most effective nonsurgical treatment. In the presence of multiple HCC nodules, TACE remains the treatment of choice.

Preoperative hepatic artery chemoembolization followed by orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

In our experience, the primary obstacle precluding the widespread use of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for definitive therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even for early-stage disease, is preventing tumor recurrence. Chemoembolization is an attractive strategy to minimize tumor progression before OLT because of its shown antitumor effect, ability to be repeated, and minimal systemic toxicity. Thus, this pilot study was undertaken to determine the tolerability and treatment outcomes of pretransplantation chemoembolization of HCC followed by OLT. Between 1992 and 1997, 27 patients with HCC who had cirrhosis, no extrahepatic metastasis, less than three tumor nodules of less than 5 cm each, and no evidence of vascular invasion on preoperative imaging studies were enrolled onto the protocol. Chemoembolization was performed using Ivalon particles with mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients completed the protocol with chemoembolization and a liver transplant. The mean United Network of Organ Sharing waiting time was 167 days. Chemoembolization was well tolerated. On examination of the explanted liver, the majority of patients had a single lesion, mean tumor size was 3.66 cm (range, 1.5 to 6 cm), and the majority of patients had stage II disease. None of the transplant recipients has developed recurrent HCC (mean follow-up, 29.2 months; range, 9 to 55 months). The 1- and 2-year disease-free survival rates are 91% and 84%, respectively. In conclusion, chemoembolization followed by OLT is well tolerated and associated with excellent outcomes in selected patients with HCC.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a registry report of the impact of tumor characteristics on outcome

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study from the International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation is to analyze the impact of tumor characteristics on tumor recurrence and patient survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Many attempts have been made to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who can be treated successfully with liver transplantation. Studies presented to date lack enough patients to make reported findings universally accepted. In lieu of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial, in 1992 an International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation was established to collect data on these patients, their tumors, and their treatment.

METHODS

The registry mails out new patient registration forms and patient follow-up forms twice yearly to all known liver transplant programs. Fifty-three programs in 21 countries have supplied information on 553 patients with tumors. Four hundred ten patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 12 had the fibrolamellar variant of HCC (FLL-HCC). These 422 patients were investigated for this study. One hundred sixty-nine of these (40.0%) were classified as "incidental tumors." For the remaining patients, the tumor was known before the transplant. Twenty-six and eight tenths percent of the patients had a history of hepatitis B and 32.7% had a history of hepatitis C.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients (46.7%) have died, 99 free of tumor and 91 with tumor. Death was tumor related in 90 patients. Of the 232 patients now living, 215 are free of tumor and 17 have tumor. The most common sites for recurrence are the transplanted liver (41.7%) and the lungs (28.7%). The overall patient survival was 72.2% at 1 year, 63.4% at 2 years, 47.4% at 4 years, and 44.4% at 5 years. Using univariate analysis, incidental tumors (p = 0.3107), FLL-HCC (p = 0.0704), multifocal tumor (p = 0.5464), and bilobar tumor (p = 0.1024) were not found to have an influence on patient survival. Four factors, tumor size greater than 5 cm (p = 0.0221), vascular invasion (p = 0.0005), positive nodes (p = 0.0014), and histologic grade (p = 0.0001) had a profound impact on patient survival. Using Cox multiple regression analysis, only histologic grade had a negative impact on overall patient survival (p = 0.0009) and for patients with known tumors (p = 0.0003). For incidental tumors, patient survival was negatively influenced by multifocality (p = 0.0021) and an age older than 60 years (p = 0.0008). Tumor histologic grade (p = 0.0134) and size (>5 cm) (p = 0.0133) were significantly linked to recurrence-free patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis has documented three tumor characteristics that strongly impact patient survival after transplantation for HCC. In addition to tumor size greater than 5 cm and the presence of vascular invasion (which confirm several, single-center studies), this registry notes that a poorly differentiated HCC may be a contraindication for transplantation. A liver tumor's histologic grade may be important information to have when these patients are considered for liver transplantation.