OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA Dose Conversion: a Systematic Literature Review

Impact of Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Pain in Cervical Dystonia

Background

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common form of focal dystonia in adults. Studies show that physiotherapy (PT) in combination with BoNT has an effect on pain in cervical dystonia. We intended to test this hypothesis in a real-world setting to answer the question of whether pain is a good target symptom for prescribing PT. We also aimed to assess which form of PT is most appropriate for the treatment of pain.

Methods

Study design: cross-sectional survey-based study of 91 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cervical dystonia. The survey consisted of a questionnaire on type, frequency and content of physiotherapy, an assessment of quality of life with the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire 24 (CDQ 24) and subjective pain scores.

Results

53.8% of patients received physiotherapy, mostly a mixture of exercises to either correct the abnormal posture or to reduce the muscle tone. Additional therapies included stress-reducing exercises (14.3%), psychotherapy (9.9%) and EMG biofeedback (2.2%). Patients who received PT showed a non-significant tendency towards higher pain scores. The severity of dystonia-associated pain was significantly associated with the patients' quality of life (F (1,54) = 22.9, adjusted R2 = 0.286, p < 0.001).

Discussion

Pain is a frequent problem in patients with CD and severely affects quality of life. Physiotherapy could therefore be a valuable treatment option for patients with CD and pain.

Highlights

Our uncontrolled study illustrates the high frequency of physiotherapy in addition to BoNT treatment in a real-life cohort of patients with cervical dystonia. We were able to show that PT reduces patients' perceived pain in a patient reported outcome measure. This highlights the importance of PT in reducing CD-related pain, which considerably impairs quality of life.

Real-world differences in dosing and clinical utilization of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of upper limb spasticity

According to prescribing information, potency units are not interchangeable between botulinum toxin A products. This exploratory study compared real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with upper limb spasticity. In this retrospective study, 101 clinicians provided chart data via online surveys for 215 US post-stroke patients treated for upper limb spasticity with ≥3 onabotulinumtoxinA or abobotulinumtoxinA doses (phase 1: 9/18/2020-12/10/2020; phase 2: 9/30/2021-12/7/2021). Most participating clinicians were physicians (70.3%) specializing in neurology (71.3%) or physiatry (20.8%). In the onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 107) and abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 108) groups, ∼75% of patients had moderate-to-severe spasticity. A range of onabotulinumtoxinA:abobotulinumtoxinA dose ratios (1:2.2 [95%CI: 1.8-2.6] to 1:4.1 [95%CI: 3.0-6.0]) was observed across muscles. For the most recent dose, mean number of muscles injected was greater for onabotulinumtoxinA (4.3) versus abobotulinumtoxinA (3.1; P = 0.0003). For onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, the proportion of injections was 81.3% versus 63.9% (P = 0.0067) in forearm muscles and 23.4% versus 3.7% (P = 0.0001) in hand muscles. Mean injection intervals were similar (onabotulinumtoxinA: 102.0 days; abobotulinumtoxinA: 99.1 days). Differences in real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA for upper limb spasticity were observed. There was no standard dose-conversion ratio, consistent with each product's prescribing information.

Botulinum toxin injection in vulva and vagina. Evidence from a literature systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) administration has been proposed in the gynecologic field for pelvic, vulvar and vaginal disorders. On this regard, we aimed assessing the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of BoNT usage in the treatment of vaginal, vulvar and pelvic pain disorders.

METHODS

We searched for all the original articles without date restriction until 31.12.2021. We included all the original articles which administered botulinum toxin in the vulva or vagina of women suffering from vaginismus, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. Only English language studies and those performed in humans were eligible. We excluded all case reports and pilot study from the qualitative analysis, although we accurately evaluated them. 22 original studies were finally included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Botulinum toxin injection was found to be effective in improving vulvar and vaginal dyspareunia, vaginismus, and chronic pelvic pain. No irreversible side effects were detected. Major side effects reported were transient urinary or fecal incontinence, constipation and rectal pain. The risk of bias assessment proved original articles to be of medium quality. No metanalysis could have been performed since lack of congruency in the definition of pathology and methods of botulinum toxin administration.

CONCLUSION

Data extraction pointed out different endpoints and different methods of analysis. Studies focus on different types of participants and use various techniques and timing. According to the best evidence available, different techniques provide evidence about positive outcomes, with the need for a standardized protocol.

The safety of botulinum neurotoxin type A's intraarticular application in experimental animals

In vivo studies of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) enabled characterization of its activity in the nociceptive sensory system separate from its preferred action in motor and autonomic nerve terminals. However, in the recent rodent studies of arthritic pain which employed high intra-articular (i.a.) doses (expressed as a total number of units (U) per animal or U/kg), possible systemic effects have not been conclusively excluded. Herein we assessed the effect of two pharmaceutical preparations, abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A, 10, 20, and 40 U/kg corresponding to 0.05, 0.11, and 0.22 ng/kg neurotoxin) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A, 10 and 20 U/kg corresponding to 0.09 and 0.18 ng/kg, respectively) injected into the rat knee, on safety-relevant readouts: digit abduction, motor performance and weight gain during 14 days post-treatment. The i. a. toxin produced dose-dependent impairment of the toe spreading reflex and rotarod performance, which was moderate and transient after 10 U/kg onaBoNT-A and ≤20 U/kg aboBoNT-A doses, and severe and long-lasting (examined up to 14 days) after ≥20 U/kg of onaBoNT-A and 40 U/kg aboBoNT-A. In addition, lower toxin doses prevented the normal weight gain compared to controls, while higher doses induced marked weight loss (≥20 U/kg of onaBoNT-A and 40 U/kg aboBoNT-A). Commonly employed BoNT-A formulations, depending on the doses, cause local relaxation of the surrounding muscles and systemic adverse effects in rats. Thus, to evade possible toxin unwanted local or systemic spread, careful dosing and motor testing should be mandatory in preclinical behavioral studies, irrespective of the sites and doses of toxin application.

Near-Infrared Transflectance Spectroscopy Discriminates Solutions Containing Two Commercial Formulations of Botulinum Toxin Type A Diluted at Recommended Volumes for Clinical Reconstitution

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is the active substance in pharmaceutical preparations widely used worldwide for the highly effective treatment of various disorders. Among the three commercial formulations of BoNT-A currently available in Italy for neurological indications, abobotulinum A toxin (Dysport®, Ipsen SpA, Milano, Italy) and incobotulinum A toxin (Xeomin®, Merz Pharma Italia srl, Milano, Italy) differ in the content of neurotoxin, non-toxic protein, and excipients. Clinical applications of BoNT-A adopt extremely diluted solutions (10−6 mg/mL) for injection in the target body district. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and chemometrics allow rapid, non-invasive, and non-destructive methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis. No data are available to date on the chemometric analysis of the spectral fingerprints acquired from the diluted commercial formulations of BoNT-A. In this proof-of-concept study, we tested whether NIRS can categorize solutions of incobotulinum A toxin (lacking non-toxic proteins) and abobotulinum A toxin (containing non-toxic proteins). Distinct excipients in the two formulations were also analyzed. We acquired transmittance spectra in the visible and short-wave infrared regions (350–2500 nm) by an ASD FieldSpec 4™ Standard-Res Spectrophotoradiometer, using a submerged dip probe designed to read spectra in transflectance mode from liquid samples. After preliminary spectra pre-processing, principal component analysis was applied to characterize the spectral features of the two BoNT-A solutions and those of the various excipients diluted according to clinical standards. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis was used to implement a classification model able to discriminate the BoNT-A solutions and excipients. NIRS distinguished solutions containing distinct BoNT-A commercial formulations (abobotulinum A toxin vs. incobotulinum A toxin) diluted at recommended volumes for clinical reconstitution, distinct proteins (HSA vs. incobotulinum A toxin), very diluted solutions of simple sugars (lactose vs. sucrose), and saline or water. Predictive models of botulinum toxin formulations were also performed with the highest precision and accuracy.

Botulinum Toxin Injections for Treatment of Drooling in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: We aimed to review and analyse the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Data sources: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) databases from inception to January 2020. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies which (1) involved children with cerebral palsy, (2) used BoNT-A for control of drooling, and (3) provided quantitative evaluations of drooling before and after intervention with BoNT-A. Results: Twenty-one trials met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that BoNT-A injections are safe and efficacious as a treatment for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Four trials had sufficient data to pool the results for the meta-analysis. Both the drooling quotient (p = 0.002) and drooling Ffrequency and severity scale (p = 0.004) supported this conclusion. Conclusion: BoNT-A injections are a safe, reversible, effective treatment for drooling control in children with cerebral palsy that can offer effectiveness for more than 3 months with few side effects. The dosage of BoNT-A should not exceed 4 units/kg. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dosage and target glands.

Real-World Dosing of OnabotulinumtoxinA and IncobotulinumtoxinA for Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm: Results from TRUDOSE and TRUDOSE II

The real-world use of onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA for cervical dystonia and blepharospasm treatment was assessed in two separate retrospective studies using identical protocols (TRUDOSE and TRUDOSE II). The studies were conducted in Mexico, Norway, and United Kingdom and designed to evaluate dose utilization of the two botulinum toxins in clinical practice. Eighty-three patients treated with both onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA for ≥2 years for each botulinum toxin were included, (52, cervical dystonia; 31, blepharospasm). All patients switched from onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA for administrative/financial reasons. A range of dose ratios (incobotulinumtoxinA to onabotulinumtoxinA) was reported; with the majority of dose ratios being >1. The mean dose ratio was >1 regardless of the study site or underlying clinical condition. The inter-injection interval was significantly longer for onabotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA when assessed for all patients (15.5 vs. 14.3 weeks; p = 0.006), resulting in fewer onabotulinumtoxinA treatments over the study time period. Consistent with product labeling, no single fixed-dose ratio exists between incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA. The dosage of each should be individualized based on patient needs and used as per product labeling. These real-world utilization data may have pharmacoeconomic implications.

Efficacy and Optimal Dose of Botulinum Toxin A in Post-Stroke Lower Extremity Spasticity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Post-stroke spasticity impedes patients’ rehabilitation progress. Contradictory evidence has been reported in using Botulinum Neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) to manage post-stroke lower extremity spasticity (PLES); furthermore, an optimum dose of BoNT-A for PLES has not yet been established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the efficacy and optimal dose of BoNT-A on PLES. "Meta" and "Metafor" packages in R were used to analyze the data. Hedges’ g statistic and random effect model were used to calculate and pool effect sizes. Twelve RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Muscle tone significantly improved in week four, week eight, and maintained to week twelve after BoNT-A injection. Improvements in functional outcomes were found, some inconsistencies among included studies were noticed. Dosage analysis from eight studies using Botox® and three studies using Dysport® indicated that the optimum dose for the commonest pattern of PLES (spastic plantar flexors) is medium-dose (approximately 300U Botox® or 1000 U Dysport®). BoNT-A should be regarded as part of a rehabilitation program for PLES. Furthermore, an optimal rehabilitation program combined with BoNT-A management needs to be established. Further studies should also focus on functional improvement by BoNT-A management in the early stage of stroke.

Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Headache: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-over Study

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) is an approved treatment for chronic migraine and has been shown to be effective in reducing number, days, and severity of headache in other headache disorders. Whether botulinum toxin is a safe and effective treatment specifically for post-traumatic headache (PTH), however, is unknown. This study sought to determine whether treatment with BoNT/A improved symptoms of PTH in military veterans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty subjects with PTH were randomized to receive treatment of either BoNT/A or a saline placebo. Sixteen weeks post-treatment or at return to baseline headache severity, subjects were crossed over to receive treatment with the other medication than previously treated with in the first session. Subjects recorded number of headaches, number of headache days, and headache pain severity in daily diaries. Outcome measures included change in the weekly number of headaches, number of headache days per week, and headache pain severity compared to baseline, and the change in number of headaches and number of headaches days at baseline compared to the rating scores averaged across weeks 6-11.

RESULTS

The number of headaches per week significantly decreased by 2.24 (43.3%) with BoNT/A treatment (P < .001) and significantly increased by 1.28 (35.1%) with placebo (P = .02) at the end of the 16 weeks and the difference between groups was also significant (P < .001). The number of headache days per week also significantly decreased by 2.24 (44.4%) at the end of 16 weeks with BoNT/A treatment (P < .001), was not significantly changed with placebo, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P < .001). Both the change in number of headaches and number of headache days averaged across weeks 6-11 compared to baseline were significantly decreased in the BoNT/A group (1.6 and 1.4, respectively) compared to a significant increase of 0.3 in number of weekly headaches and a nonsignificant decrease of 0.1 in number of headache days for the placebo group (P = .048 and P = .005, respectively). Headache pain severity was significantly reduced by 0.06 with botulinum toxin treatment (P = .02) and was not significantly increased by 0.04 in the placebo group with a significant difference between groups (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with BoNT/A clinically and significantly improved the frequency and pain severity of PTH compared to placebo in military veterans. Limitations of the study include subject dropout, adherence to documenting variables daily in the dairy, and only one treatment of BoNT/A. Strengths include the cross-over study design, which demonstrated that BoNT/A was effective regardless of treatment order. This dataset is the first prospective study to evaluate BoNT/A as an intervention for symptoms of PTH and provides evidence that larger-scale and multiple treatment studies evaluating BoNT/A for this headache type are warranted.

Botulinum Toxin Injections for Leg Contouring in East Asians

BACKGROUND

A common aesthetic concern among East Asian women is enlarged calves. Although surgical resection has been a traditional treatment option, botulinum toxin injections into the gastrocnemius muscle are an emerging, noninvasive alternative.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a literature review on botulinum toxin injections for leg contouring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane's CENTRAL database to identify articles relating to combinations of the terms botulinum toxin, gastrocnemius, calves, and leg contouring.

RESULTS

Based on the limited publications to date, the authors prepared a review on how to treat an enlarged calf with botulinum toxin including injection techniques, anticipated efficacy, outcome monitoring, and potential side effects.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin injections for calf reduction are an emerging, noninvasive treatment option. Studies to date suggest that it is an efficacious method with few immediate side effects. Future areas for investigation include defining the criteria for calf hypertrophy, minimum effective dosage of botulinum toxin, and the potential long-term effects of injections.

An Update on Botulinum Toxin in Neurology

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is an effective treatment for many neurologic disorders. This article gives a comprehensive overview of the clinical applications of BoNT across the field of neurology.

Intradermal Micro-Dosing of AbobotulinumtoxinA for Face-Lifting: How Long Does It Last?

INTRODUCTION

Intradermal injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) has been used off-label by many clinicians for face-lifting. Previous studies on abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) (Dysport®; Ipsen Biopharm Ltd.) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in face-lifting when compared to normal saline solution (NSS). However, few clinical studies have evaluated ABO in terms of duration of sustained effects for face-lifting.

METHODS

Thirty subjects were enrolled, and their face was injected with ABO at a dilution of 1 vial:7 mL (500 U in 7 mL of NSS) using an intradermal injection technique. Standardized photographic documentation was obtained using a two-, and three-dimensional imaging system (Vectra H1, Canfield Scientific, Inc, Fairfield, NJ) at baseline, immediately after injection, 2 weeks after injection and at 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 months of follow-up after treatment. The face-lifting effects were graded by both the subjects and two blinded dermatologists who compared photographs taken at the different time points. Side effects were also recorded at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Of the 30 subjects, 28 completed treatment and attended every follow-up visit. All subjects were female with Fitzpatrick skin type II to IV. The average age of the subjects was 27.6 ± 3.4 (range 22-34) years. The total number of ABO units used varied for each subject (range 200-250 U), with the average (± standard deviation) dose being 237 ± 19 units. Most of the subjects reported significant face-lifting up to 3 months post-procedure. However, face-lifting assessed by blinded dermatologists was notably lower than that of each patient's evaluation. The difference in the facial contouring volume of the nasolabial fold and jawline, as measured by the Vectra H1 imaging system, was statistically significant from baseline up until 3 months after injection (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The only side effect found in this study was minimal bruising, which was seen in 13.8% of subjects. None of the subjects reported facial asymmetry, either at rest or during facial expression.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate the face-lifting effect of ABO intradermal injection. The results show sustained effects up to 3 months after injection.

Frequency and risk factors of antibody-induced secondary failure of botulinum neurotoxin therapy

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of neutralizing antibody (NAB)–induced complete secondary treatment failure (cSTF) during long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment in various neurologic indications.

Methods

This monocenter retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 471 patients started on BoNT therapy between 1995 and 2015. Blood samples of 173 patients were investigated for NABs using the mouse hemidiaphragm test (93 with suspected therapy failure, 80 prospective study participants). The frequency of NAB-cSTF was assessed for various indications: hemifacial spasm, blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, other dystonia, and spasticity. A priori defined potential risk factors for NAB-cSTF were evaluated, and a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors.

Results

Treatment duration was 9.8 ± 6.2 years (range, 0.5–30 years; adherence, 70.6%) and number of treatment cycles 31.2 ± 22.5 (3–112). Twenty-eight of 471 patients (5.9%) had NAB-cSTF at earliest after 3 and at latest after 103 treatment cycles. None of the 49 patients treated exclusively with incobotulinumtoxinA over 8.4 ± 4.2 (1–14) years developed NAB-cSTF. Independent risk factors for NAB-cSTF were high BoNT dose per treatment, switching between onabotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT formulations (except for switching to incobotulinumtoxinA), and treatment of neck muscles.

Conclusions

We present a follow-up study with the longest duration to date on the incidence of NAB-cSTF in patients treated with various BoNT formulations, including incobotulinumtoxinA. Whereas the overall risk of NAB-cSTF is low across indications and BoNT formulations, our findings underpin the recommendations to use the lowest possible dose particularly in cervical dystonia, and to avoid unnecessary switching between different formulations.

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Hemiparesis in Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity Previously Treated With Other Botulinum Toxins: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To examine the safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA in patients previously treated with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT‐A) products other than abobotulinumtoxinA.

Design

Secondary analysis from a phase 3, double‐blind, single‐cycle, randomized, placebo‐controlled study.

Setting

Fifty‐two centers (11 countries).

Patients

Adults with spastic hemiparesis were randomized (1:1:1) to receive abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U, 1500 U, or placebo in their affected lower limb.

Main Outcome Measurements

Muscle tone (6‐point Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS], 0‐5) for the gastrocnemius‐soleus complex (GSC); proportion of MAS responders (≥1‐point improvement); angle of catch (X_V3) and spasticity grade (Y) for the GSC and soleus. Assessments were at weeks 1, 4, and 12 post‐injection. Only descriptive statistics are presented.

Results

Of 388 patients, 84 received previous BoNT‐A treatment (abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U: N = 30; abobotulinumtoxinA 1500 U: N = 28; placebo: N = 26). At week 4, mean (SD) changes in MAS score in the GSC were − 0.8 (1.1), −0.9 (1.0), and − 0.4 (0.7) for abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U, 1500 U, and placebo, respectively. Greater MAS responder rates were observed for abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo at all time points. Mean (SD) changes (week 4) for abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U, 1500 U, and placebo for X_V3 were: GSC, 8° (21), 6° (10) and 1° (7); soleus, 11° (21), 5° (9) and 0° (8), respectively; for Y: GSC, −0.4 (0.7), −0.6 (0.8) and − 0.0 (0.9); soleus, −0.5 (0.7), −0.5 (0.7) and − 0.1 (0.6), respectively. Safety data and adverse events were consistent with the overall known profile of abobotulinumtoxinA.

Conclusions

Patients previously treated with other BoNT‐As showed improved muscle tone and spasticity at week 4 following abobotulinumtoxinA injection versus placebo. These findings suggest that abobotulinumtoxinA, at the recommended doses, has a good safety and efficacy profile in adults with lower limb spasticity who were previously treated with other BoNT‐A products.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Incobotulinumtoxin-A Compared With Conventional Therapy in the Management of Post-Stroke Spasticity in Romania

Objectives: In Romania, the strokes' incidence is of 61,500 per year and improving upper limb function is the essence in rehabilitation after a stroke to maximize the patient quality of life and reduce disability. In this study, it is compared the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity with incobotulinumtoxin-A (INCO), with or without electromyographic control, against the conventional therapy programme alone (CON). Methods: A Markov state transition model was developed to effectuate a cost-utility analysis (CUA). Measurements of health-related quality of life were derived from relevant clinical trials. Utility values for quality of life by response status were derived from the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey data from a published study. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of INCO (fixed, every 12 weeks) against CON was calculated in Ron per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for both therapies. Costs and outcomes were discounted using different scenarios at 3% and 5% per year with a time horizon of 3 and 5 years because Romanian legislative norms don't specify the discount rates and time horizon for pharmacoeconomic analysis. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were managed on the base case with distributions attributed to the frequency of repeat dosing and utility valuation of the responder and the non-responder for health utilities derived from both mental and physical health state. Results: Compared with CON, in all 4 scenarios, therapy with INCO had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than 950 Euro per QALY gained (1 Euro = 4.7 Ron). INCO proved to be more favorable treatment option than CON in the treatment of upper limb spasticity in Romania. Despite costs being higher for patients treated with INCO, this treatment has more advantageous Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio. Conclusions: This therapy should be taken into account when considering rehabilitation options because it is highly cost-effective at < EURO 1,000/QALY gained, a very low WTP (Willingness To Pay) threshold. INCO proved to be a disruptive innovation because it is a new and more effective treatment, and, in the end, much higher in quality of life for patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity.

Long-term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effect and treatment stability of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with highly selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis between August 2009 and August 2015. Primary outcome was time to recommencing treatment for periocular synkinesis. Palpebral fissure width was measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at long-term ( > 2.5 years) follow-up. Mean units of botulinum toxin used pre- and postoperatively were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients, 10 could be included. Only one was free of treatment for periocular synkinesis at a follow-up of 3.5 years. The other nine patients recommenced treatment with botulinum toxin after a median time of 1.2 (interquartile range 0.6-2.6) years. Palpebral fissure width while smiling was significantly different between the pre- and postoperative (P = 0.008) and preoperative and long-term (P = 0.008) measurements. Postoperatively, previously refractory patients demonstrated good response to botulinum toxin treatments.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that most patients require renewed pharmacological treatment of periocular synkinesis after neurectomy. Although the effect of neurectomy in the treatment of refractory synkinesis does not appear to be sustained, patients usually experience a symptom-free interval and demonstrate larger palpebral fissure width at long-term follow-up compared to preoperative measurements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:2291-2295, 2018.

Chemodenervation for the Treatment of Facial Dystonia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the medical literature on the outcomes and complications of various Food and Drug Administration-approved botulinum toxins for benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) and hemifacial spasm (HFS).

METHODS

Literature searches were last conducted in February 2017 in PubMed for articles published in English and in the Cochrane Library database without language limitations; studies published before 2000 were excluded. The combined searches yielded 127 citations. Of these, 13 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment, and the panel methodologist assigned ratings to them according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A combined total of 1523 patients (1143 with BEB and 380 with HFS) were included in the 13 studies. Five studies provided level I evidence, 2 studies provided level II evidence, and 6 studies provided level III evidence. Pretarsal injections were more efficacious than preseptal injections (96% vs. 86%, respectively). Pretarsal injections also resulted in a higher response rate on clinical scales (P < 0.05) and a longer duration of maximum response for both HFS and BEB. Patients with HFS require lower overall doses of onabotulinumtoxinA than patients with BEB for a similar duration of effect. Adverse events were dose related, and they occurred more frequently in patients who were given more units.

CONCLUSIONS

Level I evidence supports the efficacy of Botox (Allergan Corp., Irvine, CA), Meditoxin, and Xeomin (Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) for the treatment of BEB. Meditoxin and Botox have equivalent effectiveness and incidence of adverse events for BEB and HFS. Dysport (Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc, Paris, France) seems to have efficacy similar to Botox and Meditoxin for BEB and HFS, but any definitive conclusions from the 2 level II studies in this review are limited by differences in the methodologies used. Higher doses of Botox and Dysport result in more adverse events. Repeated treatments using Botox seem to maintain efficacy for treatment of facial dystonias over a follow-up period of at least 10 years, based on level III evidence.

A 500 U/2 mL dilution of abobotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo: randomized study in cervical dystonia

Purpose/aim: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA) is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and a neuromuscular blocking agent. The United States prescribing information for abobotulinumtoxinA previously indicated only one dilution for cervical dystonia: 500 U/1 mL. Clinical trial data supporting a larger volume with a 500 U/2 mL dilution would offer clinicians flexibility with injection volume to better meet patient needs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a 12-week, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01753310). Adult subjects with a primary diagnosis of cervical dystonia were randomized (2:1) to receive a single injection of either abobotulinumtoxinA, 500 U/2 mL dilution, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was changed from baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score at Week 4.

RESULTS

A total of 134 subjects (abobotulinumtoxinA, n = 89; placebo, n = 45) were randomized (intent-to-treat population) and 129 (abobotulinumtoxinA, n = 84; placebo, n = 45) completed the Week 4 primary endpoint evaluation (modified intent-to-treat population). In the modified intent-to-treat population, subjects receiving abobotulinumtoxinA experienced significantly greater changes from baseline versus placebo on the primary endpoint (weighted overall treatment difference -8.3, P < 0.001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dysphagia, muscle weakness, neck pain and headache. Overall, TEAEs were consistent with those reported in the abobotulinumtoxinA prescribing information (1 mL dilution) for cervical dystonia patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial provides evidence that a 500 U/2 mL dilution is an effective treatment for cervical dystonia and exhibits a safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of abobotulinumtoxinA.

[Conversion ratio between different botulinum neuroprotein product in neurological practice]

Despite nearly 30 years of experience in the application of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in clinical practice, many fundamental questions of therapy remain valid. There are 5 botulinum toxin type A used for neurological indications in the Russian Federation in 2017. They contain different number of active neuroprotein (150 kDa) in a therapeutic dose of the drug that may have a potential impact on the efficacy and duration of action. The current SmPC of each BTA stated that the unit of activity is unique and can not be compared with any other BTA. In scientific publications one can find many details concerning the equivalence doses of onabotulinumtoxin A (botox) and abobotulinumtoxin A (dysport) and the ratio of units varies from 1:1 to 1:11. However, according to clinical guidelines, systematic reviews and high quality research evidence of recent years, the ratio of units of abobotulinumtoxin A (dysport) and onabotulinumtoxin A (botox) is 3(2,5):1. Use of a fixed ratio of units is possible only when switching from one drug to another or in case of limiting access to specific drug. Botulinum toxin type A is the first line of therapy in the treatment of several neurological diseases. The most commonly used drugs of botulinum toxin type A (botox, dysport, xeomin) have a significant evidence base that confirms their efficacy and optimal safety profile. The main difference between botulinum toxin type A is their potential activity of action, i.e., activity units and total therapeutic dose.