Improvement of pisa syndrome with contralateral pedunculopontine stimulation

Dystonia-like behaviors and impaired sensory-motor integration following neurotoxic lesion of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in mice

Introduction

The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPTg) is a vital interface between the basal ganglia and cerebellum, participating in modulation of the locomotion and muscle tone. Pathological changes of the PPTg have been reported in patients and animal models of dystonia, while its effect and mechanism on the phenotyping of dystonia is still unknown.

Methods

In this study, a series of behavioral tests focusing on the specific deficits of dystonia were conducted for mice with bilateral and unilateral PPTg excitotoxic lesion, including the dystonia-like movements evaluation, different types of sensory-motor integrations, explorative behaviors and gait. In addition, neural dysfunctions including apoptosis, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration and neural activation of PPTg-related motor areas in the basal ganglia, reticular formations and cerebellum were also explored.

Results

Both bilateral and unilateral lesion of the PPTg elicited dystonia-like behaviors featured by the hyperactivity of the hindlimb flexors. Moreover, proprioceptive and auditory sensory-motor integrations were impaired in bilaterally lesioned mice, while no overt alterations were found for the tactile sensory-motor integration, explorative behaviors and gait. Similar but milder behavioral deficits were found in the unilaterally lesioned mice, with an effective compensation was observed for the auditory sensory-motor integration. Histologically, no neural loss, apoptosis, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration were found in the substantia nigra pars compacta and caudate putamen (CPu) following PPTg lesion, while reduced neural activity was found in the dorsolateral part of the CPu and striatal indirect pathway-related structures including subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus internus and substantia nigra pars reticular. Moreover, the neural activity was decreased for the reticular formations such as pontine reticular nucleus, parvicellular reticular nucleus and gigantocellular reticular nucleus, while deep cerebellar nuclei were spared.

Conclusion

In conclusion, lesion of the PPTg could elicit dystonia-like behaviors through its effect on the balance of the striatal pathways and the reticular formations.

Dystonia and the pedunculopontine nucleus: Current evidences and potential mechanisms

Being a major component of the midbrain locomotion region, the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) is known to have various connections with the basal ganglia, the cerebral cortex, thalamus, and motor regions of the brainstem and spinal cord. Functionally, the PPN is associated with muscle tone control and locomotion modulation, including motor initiation, rhythm and speed. In addition to its motor functions, the PPN also contribute to level of arousal, attention, memory and learning. Recent studies have revealed neuropathologic deficits in the PPN in both patients and animal models of dystonia, and deep brain stimulation of the PPN also showed alleviation of axial dystonia in patients of Parkinson's disease. These findings indicate that the PPN might play an important role in the development of dystonia. Moreover, with increasing preclinical evidences showed presence of dystonia-like behaviors, muscle tone changes, impaired cognitive functions and sleep following lesion or neuromodulation of the PPN, it is assumed that the pathological changes of the PPN might contribute to both motor and non-motor manifestations of dystonia. In this review, we aim to summarize the involvement of the PPN in dystonia based on the current preclinical and clinical evidences. Moreover, potential mechanisms for its contributions to the manifestation of dystonia is also discussed base on the dystonia-related basal ganglia-cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit, providing fundamental insight into the targeting of the PPN for the treatment of dystonia in the future.

Effect of Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation on Pisa Syndrome in Parkinson's Disease

Objective: To observe the efficacy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on Pisa syndrome in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Methods: A total of 52 patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent deep brain stimulation in Beijing Hospital from July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2020 were reviewed. The clinical data were collected for the patients who met the diagnostic criteria of Pisa syndrome on “Medication-Off” state pre-operatively.

Results: Two patients met the diagnostic criteria of Pisa syndrome before operation, with a Pisa angle of 10 and 14°, respectively. The lateral trunk flexion of the two patients improved after operation. In stimulation-on/medication-off state, the Pisa angle decreased from 10 to 2° and from 14 to 6°, respectively.

Conclusion: Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation might have beneficial effects on lateral trunk flexion in PD patients, but the predictors of curative effect are not clear.

Contribution of Basal Ganglia to the Sense of Upright: A Double-Blind Within-Person Randomized Trial of Subthalamic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease with Pisa Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Verticality perception is frequently altered in Parkinson's disease (PD) with Pisa syndrome (PS). Is it the cause or the consequence of the PS?

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that both scenarios coexist.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind within-person randomized trial (NCT02704910) in 18 individuals (median age 63.5 years) with PD evolving for a median of 17.5 years and PS for 2.5 years and treated with bilateral stimulation of the subthalamus nuclei (STN-DBS) for 6.5 years. We analyzed whether head and trunk orientations were congruent with the visual (VV) and postural (PV) vertical, and whether switching on one or both sides of the STN-DBS could modulate trunk orientation via verticality representation.

RESULTS

The tilted verticality perception could explain the PS in 6/18 (33%) patients, overall in three right-handers (17%) who showed net and congruent leftward trunk and PV tilts. Two of the 18 (11%) had an outstanding clinical picture associating leftward: predominant parkinsonian symptoms, whole-body tilt (head -11°, trunk -8°) and transmodal tilt in verticality perception (PV -10°, VV -8.9°). Trunk orientation or VV were not modulated by STN-DBS, whereas PV tilts were attenuated by unilateral or bilateral stimulations if it was applied on the opposite STN.

CONCLUSION

In most cases of PS, verticality perception is altered by the body deformity. In some cases, PS seems secondary to a biased internal model of verticality, and DBS on the side of the most denervated STN attenuated PV tilts with a quasi-immediate effect. This is an interesting track for further clinical studies.

New players in basal ganglia dysfunction in Parkinson's disease

The classical model of the basal ganglia (BG) circuit has been recently revised with the identification of other structures that play an increasing relevant role especially in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD). Numerous studies have supported the spreading of the alpha-synuclein pathology to several areas beyond the BG and likely even before their involvement. With the aim of better understanding PD pathophysiology and finding new targets for treatment, the spinal cord, the pedunculopontine nucleus, the substantia nigra pars reticulata, the retina, the superior colliculus, the cerebellum, the nucleus parabrachialis and the Meynert's nucleus have been investigated both in animal and human studies. In this chapter, we describe the main anatomical and functional connections between the above structures and the BG, the relationship between their pathology and PD features, and the rational of applying neuromodulation treatment to improve motor and non-motor symptoms in PD. Some of these new players in the BG circuits might also have a potential intriguing role as early biomarkers of PD.

Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation on Postural Trunk Deformities: A Systematic Review

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) effects on postural deformities are still poorly explored.

Methods

Systematic review in accord with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA).

Results

All 38 studies that met predefined eligibility criteria had high risk of bias attributed to retrospective analysis of heterogeneous populations with variable and incompletely reported demographic and clinical characteristics, definitions, outcomes, DBS indications, targets, and settings. Five patient groups were identified in the 35 studies with individual data available: (1) parkinsonian camptocormia (n = 96): 89 patients underwent subthalamic (STN) and 7 globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) DBS. Camptocormia was the indication in 3 patients. After DBS, camptocormia improved in 57 of 96 patients (4.3-100% improvement) and remained stable or worsened in 39 of 96 patients (2-100% worsening). (2) dystonic camptocormia (n = 16): All underwent GPi-DBS. They were younger and with shorter disease duration, but longer deformity duration, compared with parkinsonian camptocormia. After GPi-DBS, camptocormia improved in all patients (50-100% improvement). (3) Parkinsonian Pisa syndrome (n = 14): 11 patients underwent STN-DBS for motor fluctuations whereas Pisa syndrome was the indication for pedunculopontine and GPi-DBS in 2 patients. After DBS, Pisa improved in 10 of 14 patients (33.3-66.7% improvement). (4) Dystonic opisthotonus: 2 young patients remarkably responded to GPi-DBS. (5) Parkinsonian anterocollis: There were variable responses in 3 patients after STN-DBS for motor fluctuations.

Conclusions

Low-quality level of evidence suggests that dystonic camptocormia and opisthotonus improve after GPi-DBS. Parkinsonian camptocormia, Pisa syndrome, and anterocollis have variable responses, and their dystonic features should be further explored.

Focus on the pedunculopontine nucleus. Consensus review from the May 2018 brainstem society meeting in Washington, DC, USA

The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) is located in the mesopontine tegmentum and is best delimited by a group of large cholinergic neurons adjacent to the decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle. This part of the brain, populated by many other neuronal groups, is a crossroads for many important functions. Good evidence relates the PPN to control of reflex reactions, sleep-wake cycles, posture and gait. However, the precise role of the PPN in all these functions has been controversial and there still are uncertainties in the functional anatomy and physiology of the nucleus. It is difficult to grasp the extent of the influence of the PPN, not only because of its varied functions and projections, but also because of the controversies arising from them. One controversy is its relationship to the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR). In this regard, the PPN has become a new target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of parkinsonian gait disorders, including freezing of gait. This review is intended to indicate what is currently known, shed some light on the controversies that have arisen, and to provide a framework for future research.

Long-term Outcome of Globus Pallidus Internus Stimulation for Pisa Syndrome

Pisa syndrome, defined as dystonia leading to lateral flexion of the spine, is an increasingly recognized complicating factor in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Symptoms may persist despite medical therapy, or medical therapy may not be tolerated due to adverse effects. Here, we demonstrate the long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the globus pallidus internus (GPi) for the treatment of Pisa syndrome. One patient with Pisa syndrome and Parkinson disease underwent bilateral GPi DBS with computed tomography (CT)-and microelectrode-based guidance. Follow-up with neurosurgery and neurology was done over a four-year period. The patient’s axial deformity decreased from approximately 45 to 25 degrees, and he reported significant relief from back pain. Bilateral GPi DBS is a safe and effective option for Pisa syndrome in patients with PD.

Managing Gait, Balance, and Posture in Parkinson's Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postural instability and gait difficulties inexorably worsen with Parkinson's disease (PD) progression and become treatment resistant, with a severe impact on autonomy and quality of life. We review the main characteristics of balance instability, gait disabilities, and static postural alterations in advanced PD, and the available treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

It remains very difficult to satisfactorily alleviate gait and postural disturbances in advanced PD. Medical and surgical interventions often fail to provide satisfactory or durable alleviation of these axial symptoms, that may actually call for differential treatments. Exercise and adapted physical activity programs can contribute to improving the patients' condition. Gait, balance, and postural disabilities are often lumped together under the Postural Instability and Gait Difficulties umbrella term. This may lead to sub-optimal patients' management as data suggest that postural, balance, and gait problems might depend on distinct underlying mechanisms. We advocate for a multidisciplinary approach from the day of diagnosis.

Current Practice and the Future of Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Parkinson's Disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease patients experiencing motor fluctuations, medication-resistant tremor, and/or dyskinesia. Currently, the subthalamic nucleus and the globus pallidus internus are the two most widely used targets, with individual advantages and disadvantages influencing patient selection. Potential DBS patients are selected using the few existing guidelines and the available DBS literature, and many centers employ an interdisciplinary team review of the individual's risk-benefit profile. Programmed settings vary based on institution- or physician-specific protocols designed to maximize benefits and limit adverse effects. Expectations should be realistic and clearly defined during the evaluation process, and each bothersome symptom should be addressed in the context of building the risk-benefit profile. Current DBS research is focused on improved symptom control, the development of newer technologies, and the improved efficiency of stimulation delivery. Techniques deliver stimulation in a more personalized way, and methods of adaptive DBS such as closed-loop approaches are already on the horizon.

Efficacy and Safety of Pedunculopontine Nuclei (PPN) Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Gait Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND

Pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) has complex reciprocal connections with basal ganglia, especially with internal globus pallidus and substantia nigra, and it has been postulated that PPN stimulation may improve gait instability and freezing of gait. In this meta-analysis, we will assess the evidence for PPN deep brain stimulation in treatment of gait and motor abnormalities especially focusing on Parkinson disease patients.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were searched for related studies published before February 2014. Medline (1966-2014), Embase (1974-2010), CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus bibliographic, and Google Scholar databases (1960-2014) were also searched for studies investigating effect of PPN deep brain stimulation in treatment of postural and postural instability and total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria for this analysis.

RESULTS

Our findings showed a significant improvement in postural instability (p<0.001) and motor symptoms of Parkinson disease on and off medications (p<0.05), but failed to show improvement in freezing of gait.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant improvement in postural instability observed in included studies, evidence from current literature is not sufficient to generalize these findings to the majority of patients.

Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease: An integrated approach from pathophysiology to management

Pisa syndrome was first described in 1972 in patients treated with neuroleptics. Since 2003, when it was first reported in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), Pisa syndrome has progressively drawn the attention of clinicians and researchers. Although emerging evidence has partially clarified its prevalence and pathophysiology, the current debate revolves around diagnostic criteria and assessment and the effectiveness of pharmacological, surgical, and rehabilitative approaches. Contrary to initial thought, Pisa syndrome is common among PD patients, with an estimated prevalence of 8.8% according to a large survey. Furthermore, it is associated with the following specific patient features: more severe motor phenotype, ongoing combined pharmacological treatment with levodopa and dopamine agonists, gait disorders, and such comorbidities as osteoporosis and arthrosis. The present literature on treatment outcomes is scant, and the uneven effectiveness of specific treatments has produced conflicting results. This might be because of the limited knowledge of Pisa syndrome pathophysiology and its variable clinical presentation, which further complicates designing randomized clinical trials on this condition. However, because some forms of Pisa syndrome are potentially reversible, there is growing consensus on the importance of its early recognition and the importance of pharmacological adjustment and rehabilitation. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment

Pisa syndrome is defined as a reversible lateral bending of the trunk with a tendency to lean to one side. It is a frequent and often disabling complication of Parkinson's disease, and has also been described in several atypical forms of parkinsonism and in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders after drug exposure and surgical procedures. Although no consistent diagnostic criteria for Pisa syndrome are available, most investigations have adopted an arbitrary cutoff of at least 10° of lateral flexion for the diagnosis of the syndrome. Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying Pisa syndrome have not been fully explained. One hypothesis emphasises central mechanisms, whereby Pisa syndrome is thought to be caused by alterations in sensory-motor integration pathways; by contrast, a peripheral hypothesis emphasises the role of anatomical changes in the musculoskeletal system. Furthermore, several drugs are reported to induce Pisa syndrome, including antiparkinsonian drugs. As Pisa syndrome might be reversible, clinicians need to be able to recognise this condition early to enable prompt management. Nevertheless, further research is needed to determine optimum treatment strategies.

Pisa Syndrome in Parkinson's Disease: Electromyographic Aspects and Implications for Rehabilitation

Pisa Syndrome (PS) is a real clinical enigma, and its management remains a challenge. In order to improve the knowledge about resting state and during maximal voluntary muscle contraction (MVMC) of the axial muscles, we described the electromyography results of paraspinal muscles, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and quadratus lumborum of both sides of 60 patients. Electromyography was assessed at rest, during MVMC while bending in the opposite direction of the PS and during MVMC while bending in the direction of the PS. The MVMC gave information about the interferential pattern (INT) or subinterferential pattern (sub-INT). We defined asymmetrical activation (AA) when a sub-INT was detected on the muscle on the side opposite to the PS bending and an INT of same muscle in the direction of PS bending. We observed significant AA during MVMC only in the external oblique muscles in 78% of the subjects. Our results of asymmetric ability to generate maximal voluntary force of the external oblique muscles support a central dissynchronisation of axial muscles as a significant contributor for the bending of the spine in erect position. These results could have important implication to physiotherapy and the use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of PS.

Axial disability and deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease

Axial motor signs-including gait impairment, postural instability and postural abnormalities-are common and debilitating symptoms in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. Dopamine replacement therapy and physiotherapy provide, at best, partial relief from axial motor symptoms. In carefully selected candidates, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus is an established treatment for 'appendicular' motor signs (limb tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity). However, the effects of DBS on axial signs are much less clear, presumably because motor control of axial and appendicular functions is mediated by different anatomical-functional pathways. Here, we discuss the successes and failures of DBS in managing axial motor signs. We systematically address a series of common clinical questions associated with the preoperative phase, during which patients presenting with prominent axial signs are considered for DBS implantation surgery, and the postoperative phase, in particular, the management of axial motor signs that newly develop as postoperative complications, either acutely or with a delay. We also address the possible merits of new targets-including the pedunculopontine nucleus area, zona incerta and substantia nigra pars reticulata-to specifically alleviate axial symptoms. Supported by a rapidly growing body of evidence, this practically oriented Review aims to support decision-making in the management of axial symptoms.

Axial disability and deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease

Axial motor signs-including gait impairment, postural instability and postural abnormalities-are common and debilitating symptoms in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. Dopamine replacement therapy and physiotherapy provide, at best, partial relief from axial motor symptoms. In carefully selected candidates, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus is an established treatment for 'appendicular' motor signs (limb tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity). However, the effects of DBS on axial signs are much less clear, presumably because motor control of axial and appendicular functions is mediated by different anatomical-functional pathways. Here, we discuss the successes and failures of DBS in managing axial motor signs. We systematically address a series of common clinical questions associated with the preoperative phase, during which patients presenting with prominent axial signs are considered for DBS implantation surgery, and the postoperative phase, in particular, the management of axial motor signs that newly develop as postoperative complications, either acutely or with a delay. We also address the possible merits of new targets-including the pedunculopontine nucleus area, zona incerta and substantia nigra pars reticulata-to specifically alleviate axial symptoms. Supported by a rapidly growing body of evidence, this practically oriented Review aims to support decision-making in the management of axial symptoms.

Continuous stimulation of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus at 40 Hz affects preparative and executive control in a delayed sensorimotor task and reduces rotational movements induced by apomorphine in the 6-OHDA parkinsonian rat

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) relays basal ganglia signals to the thalamus, lower brainstem and spinal cord. Using the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat model of parkinsonism, we investigated whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the PPTg (40 Hz, 60 μs, 200-400 μA) may influence the preparative and executive phases in a conditioned behavioural task, and the motor asymmetries induced by apomorphine. In the conditioned task, rats had to press two levers according to a fixed delay paradigm. The 6-OHDA lesion was placed in the right medial forebrain bundle, i.e. contralaterally to the preferred forepaw used by rats to press levers in the adopted task. The stimulating electrode was implanted in the right PPTg, i.e. contralateral to left side, which was expected to be most affected. The lesion significantly reduced correct responses from 63.4% to 16.6%. PPTg-DBS effects were episodic; however, when rats successfully performed in the task (18.9%), reaction time (468.8 ± 36.5 ms) was significantly increased (589.9 ± 45.9 ms), but not improved by PPTg-DBS (646.7 ± 33.8 ms). Movement time was significantly increased following the lesion (649.2 ± 42.6 ms vs. 810.9 ± 53.0 ms), but significantly reduced by PPTg-DBS (820.4 ± 39.4 ms) compared to sham PPTg-DBS (979.8 ± 47.6 ms). In a second group of lesioned rats, rotations induced by apomorphine were significantly reduced by PPTg-DBS compared to sham PPTg-DBS (12.2 ± 0.6 vs. 9.5 ± 0.4 mean turns/min). Thus, it appears that specific aspects of motor deficits in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats may be modulated by PPTg-DBS.

Deep-brain stimulation for dystonia: current indications and future orientations

ABSTRACT: Deep-brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus is a therapeutic option for dystonia. However, the available data are heterogeneous, ranging from single case reports to a few controlled studies. The outcomes are also largely heterogeneous, depending mostly on the etiology of the dystonia. Except for some well-established good indications, such as primary generalized dystonia and tardive dyskinesia, the efficacy of globus pallidus stimulation remains debated for several forms of dystonia. In addition, many issues are still unsolved, such as the best target of stimulation and the interest of simultaneously combining multiple targets of stimulation or not. Finally the efficacy of new strategies of treatment, such as cortical stimulation, remains to be determined. The aim of this review is to cover these different aspects and give an overview of the current indications and future orientations.