Ethical Considerations in Screening for Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder in the General Population

Disclosing the Risk Associated with Isolated REM Behavior Disorder: The Sleep Experts' Perspective

BACKGROUND

Isolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is associated with a high risk for phenoconversion to a neurodegenerative disorder, but the optimal approach for disclosure of this risk to patients is still debated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore views and experiences of iRBD experts regarding risk disclosure.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews with sleep experts caring for patients with iRBD were analyzed through a conventional content analysis approach.

RESULTS

We interviewed 22 iRBD experts (eight female, average age of 51.8 years) from 18 Italian sleep centers; 21/22 regularly disclosed the risks associated with iRBD, usually after the video-polysomnography, and 8/22 regularly mentioned phenoconversion rates. Content analysis allowed us to identify three main themes. First, sleep experts reported several points in favor of risk disclosure, especially related to the principle of beneficence, but some highlighted the need for specific learning on the topic. Second, experts favored a patient-tailored disclosure that should not upset the patient unnecessarily, since phenoconversion is uncertain. Third, risk disclosure was seen by participants as a relational task that should be carried out in person in the context of a trusting patient-physician relationship, while they had contrasting views regarding patients' previous knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep experts generally preferred a tailored and reassuring approach to risk disclosure within a framework of relational autonomy. The results of this study indicate the need for specific education, training, and recommendations concerning risk disclosure that should also include patients' and families' preferences.

How Lifetime Evolution of Parkinson's Disease Could Shape Clinical Trial Design: A Shared Patient-Clinician Viewpoint

Parkinson's disease (PD) has a long, heterogeneous, pre-diagnostic phase, during which pathology insidiously accumulates. Increasing evidence suggests that environmental and lifestyle factors in early life contribute to disease risk and progression. Thanks to the extensive study of this pre-diagnostic phase, the first prevention trials of PD are being designed. However, the highly heterogenous evolution of the disease across the life course is not yet sufficiently taken into account. This could hamper clinical trial success in the advent of biological disease definitions. In an interdisciplinary patient-clinician study group, we discussed how an approach that incorporates the lifetime evolution of PD may benefit the design of disease-modifying trials by impacting population, target and outcome selection. We argue that the timepoint of exposure to risk and protective factors plays a critical role in PD subtypes, influencing population selection. In addition, recent developments in differential disease mechanisms, aided by biological disease definitions, could impact optimal treatment targets. Finally, multimodal biomarker panels using this lifetime approach will likely be most sensitive as progression markers for more personalized trials. We believe that the lifetime evolution of PD should be considered in the design of clinical trials, and that such initiatives could benefit from more patient-clinician partnerships.

The Views of Patients with Isolated Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder on Risk Disclosure

BACKGROUND

Isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies. There is no consensus about disclosure of this risk to patients with iRBD.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the experiences of risk disclosure in a group of patients with iRBD and their views on what, when, and how this should be done.

METHODS

A survey was administered to patients with iRBD to explore their experiences and views on risk disclosure.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with iRBD (28 males; mean age, 70 [SD 8.7] years; mean disease duration, 8.7 [SD 6.4] years) were included. A third reported they had not been informed about the link between iRBD and other conditions by clinicians at diagnosis, but 90% would have liked to have received prognostic information, and 60% indicated that this should happen at the point that iRBD was diagnosed. Most participants wanted this information to come from the clinician diagnosing and treating iRBD (90.3%). Almost three-quarters (72.2%) had searched for this information online.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with iRBD mostly wished to have received information regarding the potential implications of iRBD when the diagnosis was made. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Risk disclosure in prodromal Parkinson's disease - A survey of neurologists

INTRODUCTION

In the absence of a disease-modifying treatment and prognostic uncertainty, ethics of risk disclosure in prodromal Parkinson's disease (PD) is challenging. Previous studies highlighted several facets of these challenges from the perspective of involved parties. However, to date, the view of neurologists who may encounter individuals with prodromal PD remained unrepresented. Moreover, cross-cultural differences intrinsic to the ethics of risk disclosure are yet to be elucidated. Therefore, we investigated the attitude of neurologists toward risk disclosure in prodromal PD.

METHODS

In this observational study, Turkish neurologists were invited to fill out a questionnaire evaluating their stance on risk disclosure regarding an individual with polysomnography-confirmed REM sleep behavior disorder, which is the strongest risk factor for PD.

RESULTS

More than 90% of the participating 222 neurologists were familiar with prodromal PD. While 15.3% stated that the risk should be disclosed in any case, 6.8% chose no disclosure. The remaining 77.9% favored disclosure only under certain circumstances, the plurality of which was the individual's consent to know about the risk. After reminding the potential neuroprotective effects of exercise and diet, neurologists who chose the option of "no disclosure" decreased to 3.2% (McNemar's test p = 0.008). No significant differences among the neurologists were found regarding sex, academic title, or field of interest.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the neurologists found it appropriate to disclose the risk of future PD only if the individual expresses a desire to know. Also, recognition of the impact of lifestyle factors on PD is important in prognostic counseling.

Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder in North American older adults in an integrated health care system

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Identifying individuals with isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavioral disorder (iRBD) is an important clinical research priority for future synucleinopathy trials. Nevertheless, little is known about the breadth of clinical settings where diagnoses of iRBD are initially made.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical record system at the University of Michigan to identify patients aged ≥ 60 years with new diagnoses of iRBD between 2015 and 2020. We focused specifically on patients receiving primary care at the University of Michigan so that we might use the university's electronic medical record system to capture the full scope of their multispecialty care interactions and diagnoses in this integrated health care system. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes to identify the time of initial clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

We found that 62/105 (59.0%) diagnoses were made by a sleep specialist, 9 (8.6%) by neurologists, and 30 (29.5%) by generalists or primary care (29.5%) providers. In addition, 67/105 (63.8%) diagnoses were made in the context of having available polysomnography results, while the remainder was made on the basis of clinical symptoms alone. The prognostic implications of iRBD were documented in 40/105 (38.1%) encounter notes and were more likely to occur in sleep clinic settings (chi-square = 12.74; P < .001) than in other contexts.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial iRBD diagnoses occur in varied clinical settings in an integrated health care system and are often made without a confirmatory polysomnogram. Documented prognostic counseling is seen most often in sleep medicine clinics. Synucleinopathy prevention trials may be best designed around a sleep clinic-focused recruitment approach.

CITATION

Havis I, Coates T, Wyant KJ, Spears CC, Garwood M, Kotagal V. Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder in North American older adults in an integrated health care system. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2173-2178.

Professionals’ Treatment Preferences in the Prodromal Phase of Parkinson’s Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Background:

In Parkinson’s disease (PD), several disease-modifying treatments are being tested in (pre-)clinical trials. To successfully implement such treatments, it is important to have insight into factors influencing the professionals’ decision to start disease-modifying treatments in persons who are in the prodromal stage of PD.

Objective:

We aim to identify factors that professionals deem important in deciding to a start disease-modifying treatment in the prodromal stage of PD.

Methods:

We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences of neurologists and last-year neurology residents regarding treatment in the prodromal phase of PD. The DCE contained 16 hypothetical choice sets in which participants were asked to choose between two treatment options. The presented attributes included treatment effect, risk of severe side-effects, risk of mild side-effects, route of administration, and annual costs.

Results:

We included 64 neurologists and 18 last year neurology residents. Participants attached most importance to treatment effect and to the risk of severe side-effects. Participants indicated that they would discuss one of the presented treatments in daily practice more often in persons with a high risk of being in the prodromal phase compared to those with a moderate risk. Other important factors for deciding to start treatment included the amount of evidence supporting the putative treatment effect, the preferences of the person in the prodromal phase, and the life expectancy.

Conclusion:

This study provides important insights in factors that influence decision making by professionals about starting treatment in the prodromal phase of PD.

Racial Differences in Trust and Risk Disclosure Preferences Among Older Registered Research Volunteers Screened for Prodromal Synucleinopathies

Background/Objectives

The equitable enrollment of minority participants in synucleinopathy trials is an emerging public health concern. Differing views regarding risk disclosure may influence research involvement in at-risk adults.

Methods

We conducted a brief mailed survey, including questions about trust and hypothetical risk disclosure preferences, to 100 participants in the Healthier Black Elders Center cohort in Detroit, MI and 100 participants in the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center Research Participant Program at the University of Michigan.

Results

125 recipients without a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disorder returned the survey, 52 (41.6%) of whom identified as being Black or African American. Black respondents reported less trust in medical providers (t=2.02, p=0.045) and medical researchers (t=2.52, p=0.013) and a greater desire to be informed about the presence of unchangeable risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders (t=2.02, p=0.045).

Conclusions

These findings have implications for the recruitment of representative populations in prodromal neurodegenerative research.

Risk Disclosure in Prodromal Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Impressive progress in the understanding of the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease (PD) in recent years has enabled the generation of disease prediction models. However, a remaining diagnostic uncertainty and lack of therapeutic options for affected individuals has resulted in a variety of ethical issues that have not to date been addressed sufficiently. Moreover, differences in the specificity of prodromal symptoms and possible subtypes of PD, especially the presence of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), may have an important impact on prognostic counseling.

OBJECTIVES

To derive a guideline for risk disclosure in prodromal PD based on the current literature and expert opinion.

METHODS

We performed (1) a literature review on prognostic counseling in PD and (2) consulted with international experts on prodromal PD using a semi-structured questionnaire based on a Delphi approach to evaluate recommendations for risk disclosure in PD.

RESULTS

The literature research revealed only 11 publications addressing prognostic counseling, with only two studies directly addressing affected individuals and most studies focusing on risk disclosure in RBD. The expert survey revealed the importance of distinguishing between individuals with and without RBD in prognostic counseling.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current literature and expert recommendations, a guideline for risk disclosure in prodromal PD for clinical care and research could be elaborated. Prognostic counseling should include differentiation between individuals with and without RBD, taking into account the high uncertainty of risk calculation in RBD-negative prodromal PD. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Probing the Pre-diagnostic Phase of Parkinson's Disease in Population-Based Studies

Parkinson's disease covers a wide spectrum of symptoms, ranging from early non-motor symptoms to the characteristic bradykinesia, tremor and rigidity. Although differences in the symptomatology of Parkinson's disease are increasingly recognized, there is still a lack of insight into the heterogeneity of the pre-diagnostic phase of Parkinson's disease. In this perspective, we highlight three aspects regarding the role of population-based studies in providing new insights into the heterogeneity of pre-diagnostic Parkinson's disease. First we describe several specific advantages of population-based cohort studies, including the design which overcomes some common biases, the broad data collection and the high external validity. Second, we draw a parallel with the field of Alzheimer's disease to provide future directions to uncover the heterogeneity of pre-diagnostic Parkinson's disease. Finally, we anticipate on the emergence of prevention and disease-modification trials and the potential role of population-based studies herein. In the coming years, bridging gaps between study designs will be essential to make vital advances in elucidating the heterogeneity of pre-diagnostic Parkinson's disease.

Prevalence of isolated RBD in the city of Catania, Italy: a population-based study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Few studies have analyzed the prevalence of isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) giving different estimates. Aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of isolated RBD in the city of Catania.

METHODS

A three-stage design was adopted. Participants attending the cabinets of General Practitioners in the city of Catania were screened with the RBD1Q questionnaire (Stage I). Positive participants were interviewed by phone and if suspected of RBD, were invited for clinical examination by a movement disorders specialist and a sleep specialist (Stage II). After the clinical examination, patients diagnosed as probable isolated RBD (pRBD) were invited to undergo a video polysomnography (VPSG) (Stage III) to confirm the diagnosis of definite RBD (dRBD).

RESULTS

A total of 1,524 participants have been screened. Of these, 220 (14.4%) screened positive. One-hundred-forty-three of them were further screened by phone, of whom 75 were suspected RBD. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed as pRBD giving a prevalence of 2.36% (95%CI 1.71-3.25). Twelve pRBD agreed to a VPSG and, of these, four were diagnosed as dRBD giving a prevalence of 0.26% (95%CI 0.07-0.67). Prevalence adjusted by non-participants was 3.48% (95%CI 2.67-4.52) and 1.18% (95%CI 0.45-1.37) for pRBD and dRBD respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of both pRBD and dRBD in Italy is comparable to the estimates reported in literature, confirming that isolated RBD has a low prevalence in the general population.