The A3 adenosine receptor as multifaceted therapeutic target: pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, and in silico approaches

General structure-activity relationship models for the inhibitors of Adenosine receptors: A machine learning approach

Adenosine receptors (A1, A2a, A2b, A3) play critical roles in cellular signaling and are implicated in various physiological and pathological processes, including inflammations and cancer. The main aim of this research was to investigate structure-activity relationships (SAR) to derive models that describe the selectivity and activity of inhibitors targeting Adenosine receptors. Structural information for 16,312 inhibitors was collected from BindingDB and analyzed using machine learning methods. 450 molecular descriptors were calculated for each molecule and compounds were classified based on their activity levels and therapeutic targets. The variable importance in projection (VIP) algorithm identified key discriminating features. Classification models were built using supervised Kohonen networks (SKN) and counter-propagation artificial neural networks (CPANN) algorithms. Model validity was assessed via cross-validation, applicability domain analysis, and test sets. These models were then used to screen a random subset of 2 million molecules from the ZINC database. Three descriptors-hydrophilic factor (Hy), ratio of multiple path count over path count (PCR), and asphericity (ASP)-were identified as critical for discriminating active and inactive inhibitors. SKN models exhibited high sensitivity (0.88-0.99) and yielded an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.922 for virtual screening. This study aimed to enhance the development of highly selective Adenosine receptor ligands for diverse therapeutic applications by identifying critical molecular features specific to each isoform.

Adenosine Receptor 3 in Liver Cancer: Expression Variability, Epigenetic Modulation, and Enhanced Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Effects

Background and Aims

Primary liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), has low response rates to existing treatments, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options. Adenosine A3 receptor (ADORA3) signaling has emerged as a potential target. Namodenoson, an ADORA3 agonist, has shown promise in early clinical trials for HCC. However, further data are required to clarify ADORA3 expression patterns in liver cancer, mechanisms of action, and the potential for combination therapies to inform patient selection for future clinical trials.

Methods

Patient-derived tissue microarrays and RNA-sequencing were employed to investigate ADORA3 expression. Cellular responses to ADORA3 stimulation and combination treatments were studied in HCC and CCA cell lines and patient-derived organoids (PDOs). Genome-wide RNA-Seq analysis, mRNA analysis, and DigiWest protein profiling were performed.

Results

Tissue microarray analysis revealed higher ADORA3 expression in nonmalignant samples and a subset of tumors with weak or absent ADORA3 expression. This was supported by RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and needle biopsy samples. Cell lines and PDOs exhibited antiproliferative effects with the ADORA3 agonist Namodenoson, confirmed by receptor dependency tests with specific antagonists and siRNA experiments. Genome-wide RNA-Seq analysis suggested chromatin remodeling events after ADORA3 stimulation. mRNA expression and DigiWest profiling identified downregulation of histone deacetylases and histone H3 modifications. Combination treatments with different ADORA3 agonists and histone deacetylase inhibitors significantly enhanced antiproliferative effects in almost all selected combinations, supported by investigations in PDOs.

Conclusion

ADORA3 expression varies considerably in HCC or CCA, ranging from high to absent receptor detection. This observation might help to identify patients for clinical studies. Additionally, Namodenoson's epigenetic modulating activity suggests epigenetic drugs as promising candidates for combination treatment.

Potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonists bearing aminoesters as heterobifunctional moieties

A₃ adenosine receptors were found to have a role in different pathological states, such as glaucoma, renal fibrosis, neuropathic pain and cancer. Consequently, it is important to utilize any molecular tool which could help to study these conditions. In the present study we continue our search for potent A₃ adenosine receptor ligands which could be successively conjugated to other molecules with the aim of obtaining more potent (e.g. allosteric ligand conjugation) or detectable ligands (e.g. fluorescent molecule or biotin conjugation). Specifically, different aminoester moieties were introduced at the 5 position of the pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine core. The ester functionalization represents the candidate for the subsequent conjugation. All the reported compounds are potent hA₃ adenosine receptor antagonists and some of them exhibited high selectivity against the other adenosine receptors. The main structural terms of ligand recognition and selectivity were disclosed by molecular modelling studies. Molecular docking results led to the characterization of an alternative binding mode for antagonists at the orthosteric binding site of the hA₃ adenosine receptor, evaluated and assessed by classical molecular dynamics simulations.

The Anti-Inflammatory and Pain-Relieving Effects of AR170, an Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonist, in a Rat Model of Colitis

The pharmacological activation of A₃ receptors has shown potential usefulness in the management of bowel inflammation. However, the role of these receptors in the control of visceral hypersensitivity in the presence of intestinal inflammation has not been investigated. The effects of AR170, a potent and selective A₃ receptor agonist, and dexamethasone (DEX) were tested in rats with 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS)-induced colitis to assess their tissue inflammatory parameters. The animals received AR170, DEX, or a vehicle intraperitoneally for 6 days, starting 1 day before the induction of colitis. Visceral pain was assessed by recording the abdominal responses to colorectal distension in animals with colitis. Colitis was associated with a decrease in body weight and an increase in spleen weight. The macroscopic damage score and tissue tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels were also enhanced. AR170, but not DEX, improved body weight. Both drugs counteracted the increase in spleen weight, ameliorated macroscopic colonic damage, and decreased TNF, IL-1β, and MPO tissue levels. The enhanced visceromotor response (VMR) in rats with colitis was decreased via AR170 administration. In rats with colitis, AR170 counteracted colonic inflammatory cell infiltration and decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, thereby relieving visceral hypersensitivity.

Role and Function of Adenosine and its Receptors in Inflammation, Neuroinflammation, IBS, Autoimmune Inflammatory Disorders, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriasis

The physiological effects of endogenous adenosine on various organ systems are very complex and numerous which are elicited upon activation of any of the four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) denoted as A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). Several fused heterocyclic and non-xanthine derivatives are reported as a possible target for these receptors due to physiological problems and lack of selectivity of xanthine derivatives. In the present review, we have discussed the development of various new chemical entities as a target for these receptors. In addition, compounds acting on adenosine receptors can be utilized in treating diseases like inflammation, neuroinflammation, autoimmune and related diseases.

Conjugable A3 adenosine receptor antagonists for the development of functionalized ligands and their use in fluorescent probes

Compounds able to simultaneously bind a biological target and be conjugated to a second specific moiety are attractive tools for the development of multi-purpose ligands useful as multi-target ligands, receptor probes or drug delivery systems, with both therapeutic and diagnostic applications. The human A₃ adenosine receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor involved in many physio-pathological conditions, e.g. cancer and inflammation, thus representing a promising research target. In this work, two series of conjugable hA₃AR antagonists, based on the pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine nucleus, were developed. The introduction of an aromatic ring at the 5 position of the scaffold, before (phenylacetamido moiety) or after (1,2,3-triazole obtained by click chemistry) the conjugation is aimed to increase affinity and selectivity towards the hA₃AR receptor. As expected, conjugable compounds showed good affinity towards the hA₃AR. In order to prove their potential in the development of hA₃AR ligands for different purposes, compounds were also functionalized with fluorescent probes. Unfortunately, conjugation decreased affinity and selectivity for the target as compared to the hA_2AAR. Computational studies identified specific non-conserved residues of the extracellular loops which constitute a structural barrier able to discriminate between ligands, giving insights into the rational development of new highly selective ligands.

Chemical Probes for the Adenosine Receptors

Research on the adenosine receptors has been supported by the continuous discovery of new chemical probes characterized by more and more affinity and selectivity for the single adenosine receptor subtypes (A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ adenosine receptors). Furthermore, the development of new techniques for the detection of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) requires new specific probes. In fact, if in the past radioligands were the most important GPCR probes for detection, compound screening and diagnostic purposes, nowadays, increasing importance is given to fluorescent and covalent ligands. In fact, advances in techniques such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescent polarization, as well as new applications in flow cytometry and different fluorescence-based microscopic techniques, are at the origin of the extensive research of new fluorescent ligands for these receptors. The resurgence of covalent ligands is due in part to a change in the common thinking in the medicinal chemistry community that a covalent drug is necessarily more toxic than a reversible one, and in part to the useful application of covalent ligands in GPCR structural biology. In this review, an updated collection of available chemical probes targeting adenosine receptors is reported.

New A2A adenosine receptor antagonists: a structure-based upside-down interaction in the receptor cavity

Adenosine receptor antagonists are generally based on heterocyclic core structures presenting substituents of various volumes and chemical-physical profiles. Adenine and purine-based adenosine receptor antagonists have been reported in literature. In this work we combined various substituents in the 2, 6, and 8-positions of 9-ethylpurine to depict a structure-affinity relationship analysis at the human adenosine receptors. Compounds were rationally designed trough molecular modeling analysis and then synthesized and evaluated at radioligand binding studies at human adenosine receptors. The new compounds showed affinity for the human adenosine receptors, with some derivatives endowed with low nanomolar K_i data, in particular at the A_2AAR subtype. The purine core proves to be a versatile core structure for the development of novel adenosine receptor antagonists with nanomolar affinity for these membrane proteins.

Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines to develop functionalized ligands to target adenosine receptors: fluorescent ligands as an example

A series of adenosine receptor antagonists bearing a reactive linker was developed. Functionalization of these derivatives is useful to easily obtain multi-target ligands, receptor probes, drug delivery systems, and diagnostic or theranostic systems. The pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine scaffold was chosen as a pharmacophore for the adenosine receptors. It was substituted at the 5 position with reactive linkers of different lengths. Then, these compounds were used to synthesise probes for the adenosine receptors by functionalization with a fluorescent moiety. Both series of compounds were evaluated for their binding at the four adenosine receptor subtypes. Different affinity and selectivity profiles were observed towards hA1, hA2A and hA3 adenosine receptors. In particular, fluorescent compounds behave as dual hA2A/hA3 ligands. Computational studies suggested different binding modes for developed compounds at the three receptors. Both molecular docking and supervised molecular dynamics (SuMD) simulations confirmed that the preferred binding mode at the single receptor was driven by the substitution present at the 5 position. Obtained results rationalized the compounds' binding profile at the adenosine receptors and pave the way for the development of more potent conjugable and conjugated ligands targeting these membrane receptors.

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Adenosine Receptors: Advances, Applications and Trends

:

Adenosine receptors (ARs) are transmembrane proteins that belong to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) superfamily and mediate the biological functions of adenosine. To date, four AR subtypes are known, namely A1, A2A, A2B and A3 that exhibit different signaling pathways, tissue localization, and mechanisms of activation. Moreover, the widespread ARs and their implication in numerous physiological and pathophysiological conditions had made them pivotal therapeutic targets for developing clinically effective agents.

:

The crystallographic success in identifying the 3D crystal structures of A2A and A1 ARs has dramatically enriched our understanding of their structural and functional properties such as ligand binding and signal transduction. This, in turn, has provided a structural basis for a larger contribution of computational methods, particularly molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, toward further investigation of their molecular properties and designing bioactive ligands with therapeutic potential. MD simulation has been proved to be an invaluable tool in investigating ARs and providing answers to some critical questions. For example, MD has been applied in studying ARs in terms of ligand-receptor interactions, molecular recognition, allosteric modulations, dimerization, and mechanisms of activation, collectively aiding in the design of subtype selective ligands.

:

In this review, we focused on the advances and different applications of MD simulations utilized to study the structural and functional aspects of ARs that can foster the structure-based design of drug candidates. In addition, relevant literature was briefly discussed which establishes a starting point for future advances in the field of drug discovery to this pivotal group of drug targets.

Probing structure-activity relationship in β-arrestin2 recruitment of diversely substituted adenosine derivatives

In the adenosine receptor (AR) subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), biased agonism has been described for the human A₁AR, A_2BAR and A₃AR. While diverse A₃AR agonists have been evaluated for receptor binding and G_i-mediated cAMP signalling, the β-arrestin2 (βarr2) pathway has been left largely unexplored. We screened nineteen diverse adenosine derivatives for βarr2 recruitment using a stable hA₃AR-NanoBit^®-βarr2 HEK293T cell line. Their activity profiles were compared with a cAMP accumulation assay in stable hA₃AR CHO cells. Structural features linked to βarr2 activation were further investigated by the evaluation of an additional ten A₃AR ligands. The A₃AR-selective reference agonist 2-Cl-IB-MECA, which is a full agonist in terms of cAMP inhibition, only showed partial agonist behaviour in βarr2 recruitment. Highly A₃AR-selective (N)-methanocarba 5'-uronamide adenosine derivatives displayed higher potency in both cAMP signalling and βarr2 recruitment than reference agonists NECA and 2-Cl-IB-MECA. Their A₃AR-preferred conformation tolerates C2-position substitutions, for increased βarr2 efficacy, better than the flexible scaffolds of ribose derivatives. The different amino functionalities in the adenosine scaffold of these derivatives each seem to be important for signalling as well. In conclusion, we have provided insights into ligand features that can help to guide the future therapeutic development of biased A₃AR ligands with respect to G-protein and βarr2 signalling.

Molecular dissection of the human A3 adenosine receptor coupling with β-arrestin2

Besides classical G protein coupling, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are nowadays well known to show significant signalling via other adaptor proteins, such as β-arrestin2 (βarr2). The elucidation of the molecular mechanism of the GPCR-βarr2 interaction is a prerequisite for the structure-activity based design of biased ligands, which introduces a new chapter in drug discovery. The general mechanism of the interaction is believed to rely on phosphorylation sites, exposed upon agonist binding. However, it is not known whether this mechanism is universal throughout the GPCR family or if GPCR-specific patterns are involved. In recent years, promising orally active agonists for the human A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR), a GPCR highly expressed in inflammatory and cancer cells, have been evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, the effect of cytoplasmic modifications of the A₃AR on βarr2 recruitment was evaluated in transiently transfected HEK293T cells, using a live-cell split-reporter system (NanoBit®, Promega), based on the structural complementation of NanoLuc luciferase, allowing real-time βarr2 monitoring. The A₃AR-selective reference agonist 2-Cl-IB-MECA yielded a robust, concentration dependent (5 nM-1 µM) recruitment of βarr2 (logEC50: -7.798 ± 0.076). The role of putative phosphorylation sites, located in the C-terminal part and cytoplasmic loops, and the role of the 'DRY' motif was evaluated. It was shown that the A₃AR C-terminus was dispensable for βarr2 recruitment. This contrasts with studies in the past for the rat A₃AR, which pointed at crucial C-terminal phosphorylation sites. When combining truncation of the A₃AR with modification of the 'DRY' motif to 'AAY', the βarr2 recruitment was drastically reduced. Recruitment could be partly rescued by back-mutation to 'NQY', or by extending the C-terminus again. In conclusion, other parts of the human A₃AR, either cytosolic or exposed upon receptor activation, rather than the C-terminus alone, are responsible for βarr2 recruitment in a complementary or synergistic way.

Interaction between saliva's adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction

Background

It has recently been demonstrated that saliva from Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks contains adenosine (ADO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), two non-protein molecules that have significant immunomodulatory properties. These molecules can inhibit cytokine production by dendritic cells (DCs), while also reducing the expression of CD40 in these cells. However, more studies are needed for a better understanding of their participation in the feeding of ticks in vivo. This work, therefore, evaluated the importance of ADO during tick infestations. Mice were infested with adult ticks (3 couples/mouse), and their skin was collected at the tick-infested site (3rd and 7th day), and mRNA for receptors of ADO was quantified by real-time PCR.

Results

Tick infestation increased by four and two times the expression of the A2b and A3v1 receptors on day 3, respectively, while expression of other ADO receptors was unaltered. In addition, we treated mice (n = 10/group) daily with 8-(p-Sulfophenyl)theophylline, 8-pSPT, 20 mg/kg, i.p.), a non-selective antagonist of ADO receptors, and evaluated the performance of ticks during infestations. Female ticks fed on 8-pSPT-treated mice presented a reduction in their engorgement, weight and hatching rates of egg masses, and survival times of larvae compared to the same parameters presented by ticks in the control group. To investigate if these 8-pSPT-treated mice presented altered immune responses, we performed three tick infestations and collected their lymph node cells to determine the percentages and activation state of DCs and cytokine production by lymphocytes by flow cytometry (Cytometric Bead Array technique, CBA). Our data showed that 8-pSPT-treated mice presented an increase in the percentage of DCs as well as of their stimulatory and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80 and MHCII). Regarding production of T cell cytokines, we observed a significant increase in the levels of IL-2 and a significant decrease in IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines.

Conclusions

These results suggest that ADO produced by ticks helps them feed and reproduce and that this effect may be due to modulation of host DCs and T cells.

Structural Probing and Molecular Modeling of the A₃ Adenosine Receptor: A Focus on Agonist Binding

Adenosine is an endogenous modulator exerting its functions through the activation of four adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes, termed A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃, which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. The human A₃AR (hA₃AR) subtype is implicated in several cytoprotective functions. Therefore, hA₃AR modulators, and in particular agonists, are sought for their potential application as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and cardioprotective agents. Structure-based molecular modeling techniques have been applied over the years to rationalize the structure–activity relationships (SARs) of newly emerged A₃AR ligands, guide the subsequent lead optimization, and interpret site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) data from a molecular perspective. In this review, we showcase selected modeling-based and guided strategies that were applied to elucidate the binding of agonists to the A₃AR and discuss the challenges associated with an accurate prediction of the receptor extracellular vestibule through homology modeling from the available X-ray templates.

Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Different Binding Modes of Non-nucleoside Agonists at the A2A Adenosine Receptor

Non-nucleoside agonists of adenosine receptors were analysed at the A2A adenosine receptor to simulate and compare their possible binding modes. The docking studies were performed by using different arrangements of the binding cavity and various docking tools. Mutagenesis results reported in literature were used as reference data for the assessment of the different ligand arrangements observed in this study. The results suggest four possible binding modes, two of which appear compatible with an agonist activity and in agreement with the mutagenesis data. This study provides useful information for the design of new simplified compounds presenting agonist activity at the A2A adenosine receptor.

Adenosine as a Multi-Signalling Guardian Angel in Human Diseases: When, Where and How Does it Exert its Protective Effects?

The importance of adenosine for human health cannot be overstated. Indeed, this ubiquitous nucleoside is an integral component of ATP, and regulates the function of every tissue and organ in the body. Acting via receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms [the former mediated via four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), A1, A2A, A2B, and A3,], it has a significant role in protecting against cell damage in areas of increased tissue metabolism, and combating organ dysfunction in numerous pathological states. Accordingly, raised levels of adenosine have been demonstrated in epilepsy, ischaemia, pain, inflammation, and cancer, in which its behaviour can be likened to that of a guardian angel, even though there are instances in which overproduction of adenosine is pathological. In this review, we condense the current body of knowledge on the issue, highlighting when, where, and how adenosine exerts its protective effects in both the brain and the periphery.

Novel homologated-apio adenosine derivatives as A3 adenosine receptor agonists: design, synthesis and molecular docking studies

A series of homologated-apio adenosine derivatives including homologated-apio IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA have been designed and synthesized successfully. The molecular modelling and docking studies of the compounds have been explored as A₃AR agonists.

The Influence of the 1-(3-Trifluoromethyl-Benzyl)-1H-Pyrazole-4-yl Moiety on the Adenosine Receptors Affinity Profile of Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-c]Pyrimidine Derivatives

A new series of pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (PTP) derivatives has been developed in order to explore their affinity and selectivity profile at the four adenosine receptor subtypes. In particular, the PTP scaffold was conjugated at the C2 position with the 1-(3-trifluoromethyl-benzyl)-1H-pyrazole, a group believed to confer potency and selectivity toward the human (h) A_2B adenosine receptor (AR) to the xanthine ligand 8-(1-(3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione (CVT 6975). Interestingly, the synthesized compounds turned out to be inactive at the hA_2B AR but they displayed affinity at the hA₃ AR in the nanomolar range. The best compound of the series (6) shows both high affinity (hA₃ AR K_i = 11 nM) and selectivity (A₁/A₃ and A_2A/A₃ > 9090; A_2B/A₃ > 909) at the hA₃ AR. To better rationalize these results, a molecular docking study on the four AR subtypes was performed for all the synthesized compounds. In addition, CTV 6975 and two close analogues have been subjected to the same molecular docking protocol to investigate the role of the 1-(3-trifluoromethyl-benzyl)-1H-pyrazole on the binding at the four ARs.

Adenosine receptor neurobiology: overview

Adenosine is a naturally occurring nucleoside that is distributed ubiquitously throughout the body as a metabolic intermediary. In the brain, adenosine functions as an important upstream neuromodulator of a broad spectrum of neurotransmitters, receptors, and signaling pathways. By acting through four G-protein-coupled receptors, adenosine contributes critically to homeostasis and neuromodulatory control of a variety of normal and abnormal brain functions, ranging from synaptic plasticity, to cognition, to sleep, to motor activity to neuroinflammation, and cell death. This review begun with an overview of the gene and genome structure and the expression pattern of adenosine receptors (ARs). We feature several new developments over the past decade in our understanding of AR functions in the brain, with special focus on the identification and characterization of canonical and noncanonical signaling pathways of ARs. We provide an update on functional insights from complementary genetic-knockout and pharmacological studies on the AR control of various brain functions. We also highlight several novel and recent developments of AR neurobiology, including (i) recent breakthrough in high resolution of three-dimension structure of adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs) in several functional status, (ii) receptor-receptor heterodimerization, (iii) AR function in glial cells, and (iv) the druggability of AR. We concluded the review with the contention that these new developments extend and strengthen the support for A1 and A2ARs in brain as therapeutic targets for neurologic and psychiatric diseases.

Design, synthesis and evaluation of N6-substituted 2-aminoadenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamides as A3 adenosine receptor agonists

A series of N⁶-substituted 2-aminoadenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamides were synthesized from the versatile intermediate, O⁶-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-2-amino-2′,3′-O-isopropylideneinosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide (1) and evaluated as A₃ adenosine receptor agonists.

A3 Adenosine receptors mediate oligodendrocyte death and ischemic damage to optic nerve

Adenosine receptor activation is involved in myelination and in apoptotic pathways linked to neurodegenerative diseases. In this study, we investigated the effects of adenosine receptor activation in the viability of oligodendrocytes of the rat optic nerve. Selective activation of A3 receptors in pure cultures of oligodendrocytes caused concentration-dependent apoptotic and necrotic death which was preceded by oxidative stress and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Oligodendrocyte apoptosis induced by A3 receptor activation was caspase-dependent and caspase-independent. In addition to dissociated cultures, incubation of optic nerves ex vivo with adenosine and the A3 receptor agonist 2-CI-IB-MECA(1-[2-Chloro-6-[[(3-iodophenyl)methyl]amino]-9H-purin-9-yl]-1-deoxy-N-methyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamide)-induced caspase-3 activation, oligodendrocyte damage, and myelin loss, effects which were prevented by the presence of caffeine and the A3 receptor antagonist MRS 1220 (N-[9-Chloro-2-(2-furanyl)[1,2,4]-triazolo [1,5-c]quinazolin-5-yl]benzene acetamide). Finally, ischemia-induced injury and functional loss to the optic nerve was attenuated by blocking A3 receptors. Together, these results indicate that adenosine may trigger oligodendrocyte death via activation of A3 receptors and suggest that this mechanism contributes to optic nerve and white matter ischemic damage.

Rational design of sulfonated A3 adenosine receptor-selective nucleosides as pharmacological tools to study chronic neuropathic pain

(N)-Methanocarba(bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane)adenosine derivatives were probed for sites of charged sulfonate substitution, which precludes diffusion across biological membranes, e.g., blood-brain barrier. Molecular modeling predicted that sulfonate groups on C2-phenylethynyl substituents would provide high affinity at both mouse (m) and human (h) A3 adenosine receptors (ARs), while a N(6)-p-sulfophenylethyl substituent would determine higher hA3AR vs mA3AR affinity. These modeling predictions, based on steric fitting of the binding cavity and crucial interactions with key residues, were confirmed by binding/efficacy studies of synthesized sulfonates. N(6)-3-Chlorobenzyl-2-(3-sulfophenylethynyl) derivative 7 (MRS5841) bound selectively to h/m A3ARs (Ki(hA3AR) = 1.9 nM) as agonist, while corresponding p-sulfo isomer 6 (MRS5701) displayed mixed A1/A3AR agonism. Both nucleosides administered ip reduced mouse chronic neuropathic pain that was ascribed to either A3AR or A1/A3AR using A3AR genetic deletion. Thus, rational design methods based on A3AR homology models successfully predicted sites for sulfonate incorporation, for delineating adenosine's CNS vs peripheral actions.

Structure-based approaches to ligands for G-protein-coupled adenosine and P2Y receptors, from small molecules to nanoconjugates

Adenosine receptor (ARs) and P2Y receptors (P2YRs) that respond to extracellular nucleosides/nucleotides are associated with new directions for therapeutics. The X-ray structures of the A2AAR complexes with agonists and antagonists are examined in relationship to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and applied to drug discovery. Much of the data on AR ligand structure from early SAR studies now are explainable from the A2AAR X-ray crystallography. The ligand-receptor interactions in related GPCR complexes can be identified by means of modeling approaches, e.g., molecular docking. Thus, molecular recognition in binding and activation processes has been studied effectively using homology modeling and applied to ligand design. Virtual screening has yielded new nonnucleoside AR antagonists, and existing ligands have been improved with knowledge of the receptor interactions. New agonists are being explored for central nervous system and peripheral therapeutics based on in vivo activity, such as chronic neuropathic pain. Ligands for receptors more distantly related to the X-ray template, i.e., P2YRs, have been introduced and are mainly used as pharmacological tools for elucidating the physiological role of extracellular nucleotides. Other ligand tools for drug discovery include fluorescent probes, radioactive probes, multivalent probes, and functionalized nanoparticles.

Probing GPCR structure: adenosine and P2Y nucleotide receptors

The adenosine receptors (ARs) provide an example of how to accurately predict ligand recognition, even prior to the availability of a crystallographic structure. Homology modeling has been used to gain structural insight, in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis, and structure-activity relationships of small molecular ligands. Recent X-ray structures greatly improved the accuracy of knowledge of AR ligand recognition and furthermore characterized conformational changes induced by receptor activation. Now, homology modeling extends these structural insights to related GPCRs and suggests new ligand structures. This strategy is also being applied to the eight subtypes of P2Y receptors for extracellular nucleotides, which lack X-ray structures and are best modeled by homology to the CXCR4 (peptide) receptor. Neoceptors, as studied for three of the four AR subtypes, create a molecular complementarity between a mutant receptor and a chemically tailored agonist ligand to selectively enhance affinity, implying direct physical contact and thus validating docking hypotheses.

Truncated Nucleosides as A(3) Adenosine Receptor Ligands: Combined 2-Arylethynyl and Bicyclohexane Substitutions

C2-Arylethynyladenosine-5'-N-methyluronamides containing a bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane ((N)-methanocarba) ring are selective A(3) adenosine receptor (AR) agonists. Similar 4'-truncated C2-arylethynyl-(N)-methanocarba nucleosides containing alkyl or alkylaryl groups at the N(6) position were low-efficacy agonists or antagonists of the human A(3)AR with high selectivity. Higher hA(3)AR affinity was associated with N(6)-methyl and ethyl (K(i) 3-6 nM), than with N(6)-arylalkyl groups. However, combined C2-phenylethynyl and N(6)-2-phenylethyl substitutions in selective antagonist 15 provided a K(i) of 20 nM. Differences between 4'-truncated and nontruncated analogues of extended C2-p-biphenylethynyl substitution suggested a ligand reorientation in AR binding, dominated by bulky N(6) groups in analogues lacking a stabilizing 5'-uronamide moiety. Thus, 4'-truncation of C2-arylethynyl-(N)-methanocarba adenosine derivatives is compatible with general preservation of A(3)AR selectivity, especially with small N(6) groups, but reduced efficacy in A(3)AR-induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase.

Allosteric modulators of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors: opportunities in drug development

Rhodopsin-like (class A) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the most important classes of drug targets. The discovery that these GPCRs can be allosterically modulated by small drug molecules has opened up new opportunities in drug development. It will allow the drugability of "difficult targets", such as GPCRs activated by large (glyco)proteins, or by very polar or highly lipophilic physiological agonists. Receptor subtype selectivity should be more easily achievable with allosteric than with orthosteric ligands. Allosteric modulation will allow a broad spectrum of pharmacological effects largely expanding that of orthosteric ligands. Furthermore, allosteric modulators may show an improved safety profile as compared to orthosteric ligands. Only recently, the explicit search for allosteric modulators has been started for only a few rhodopsin-like GPCRs. The first negative allosteric modulators (allosteric antagonists) of chemokine receptors, maraviroc (CCR5 receptor), used in HIV therapy, and plerixafor (CXCR4 receptor) for stem cell mobilization, have been approved as drugs. The development of allosteric modulators for rhodopsin-like GPCRs as novel drugs is still at an early stage; it appears highly promising.

Structure-guided design of A(3) adenosine receptor-selective nucleosides: combination of 2-arylethynyl and bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane substitutions

(N)-Methanocarba adenosine 5'-methyluronamides containing known A(3) AR (adenosine receptor)-enhancing modifications, i.e., 2-(arylethynyl)adenine and N(6)-methyl or N(6)-(3-substituted-benzyl), were nanomolar full agonists of human (h) A(3)AR and highly selective (K(i) ∼0.6 nM, N(6)-methyl 2-(halophenylethynyl) analogues 13 and 14). Combined 2-arylethynyl-N(6)-3-chlorobenzyl substitutions preserved A(3)AR affinity/selectivity in the (N)-methanocarba series (e.g., 3,4-difluoro full agonist MRS5698 31, K(i) 3 nM, human and mouse A(3)) better than that for ribosides. Polyaromatic 2-ethynyl N(6)-3-chlorobenzyl analogues, such as potent linearly extended 2-p-biphenylethynyl MRS5679 34 (K(i) hA(3) 3.1 nM; A(1), A(2A), inactive) and fluorescent 1-pyrene adduct MRS5704 35 (K(i) hA(3) 68.3 nM), were conformationally rigid; receptor docking identified a large, mainly hydrophobic binding region. The vicinity of receptor-bound C2 groups was probed by homology modeling based on recent X-ray structure of an agonist-bound A(2A)AR, with a predicted helical rearrangement requiring an agonist-specific outward displacement of TM2 resembling opsin. Thus, the X-ray structure of related A(2A)AR is useful in guiding the design of new A(3)AR agonists.