1
|
Jurczak J, Rapp B, Bordy JM, Josset S, Dufreneix S. Defining field output factors in small fields based on dose area product measurements: A feasibility study. Med Phys 2024; 51:3677-3686. [PMID: 38266116 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose area product in water (DAPw) in small fields relies on the use of detectors with a sensitive area larger than the irradiation field. This quantity has recently been used to establish primary standards down to 5 mm field size, with an uncertainty smaller than 0.7%. It has the potential to decrease the uncertainty related to field output factors, but is not currently integrated into treatment planning systems. PURPOSE This study aimed to explore the feasibility of converting DAPw into a point dose in small fields by determining the volume averaging correction factor. By determining the field output factors, a comparison between the so-called "DAPw to point dose" approach and the IAEA TRS483 methodology was performed. METHOD Diodes, microdiamonds, and a micro ionization chamber were used to measure field output factors following the IAEA TRS483 methodology on two similar linacs equipped with circular cones down to 6 mm diameter. For the "DAPw to point dose" approach, measurements were performed with a dedicated and built-in-house 3 cm diameter plane-parallel ionization chamber calibrated in terms of DAPw in the French Primary Dosimetry Standards Laboratory LNE-LNHB. Beam profile measurements were performed to generate volume averaging correction factors enabling the conversion of an integral DAPw measurement into a point dose and the determination of the field output factors. Both sets of field output factors were compared. RESULTS According to the IAEA TRS483 methodology, field output factors were within ±3% for all detectors on both linacs. Large variations were observed for the volume averaging correction factors with a maximum spread between the detectors of 26% for the smallest field size. Consequently, deviations of up to 15% between the "IAEA TRS483" and the "DAPw to point dose" methodologies were found for the field output factor of the smallest field size. This was attributed to the difficulty in accurately determining beam profiles in small fields. CONCLUSION Although primary standards associated with small uncertainties can be established in terms of DAPw in a primary laboratory, the "DAPw to point dose" methodology requires volume averaging correction to derive a field output factor from DAPw measurements. None of the point detectors studied provided satisfactory results, and additional work using other detectors, such as film, is still required to allow the transfer of a DAP primary standard to users in terms of absorbed point dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Jurczak
- CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Rapp
- CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| | - Jean-Marc Bordy
- CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| | - Stephanie Josset
- Medical Physics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, Angers, France
| | - Stephane Dufreneix
- CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
- Medical Physics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garibaldi C, Beddar S, Bizzocchi N, Tobias Böhlen T, Iliaskou C, Moeckli R, Psoroulas S, Subiel A, Taylor PA, Van den Heuvel F, Vanreusel V, Verellen D. Minimum and optimal requirements for a safe clinical implementation of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy: A focus on patient's safety and radiation protection. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110291. [PMID: 38648991 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Garibaldi
- IEO, Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| | - Sam Beddar
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicola Bizzocchi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charoula Iliaskou
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79106, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Serena Psoroulas
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science, Teddington, UK
| | - Paige A Taylor
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frank Van den Heuvel
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Institute, Vlissingen, the Netherlands; Dept of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Verdi Vanreusel
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp University (Centre for Oncological Research, CORE), Antwerpen, Belgium; SCK CEN (Research in Dosimetric Applications), Mol, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp University (Centre for Oncological Research, CORE), Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan HQ, Lew KS, Wong YM, Chong WC, Koh CWY, Chua CGA, Yeap PL, Ang KW, Lee JCL, Park SY. Detecting outliers beyond tolerance limits derived from statistical process control in patient-specific quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14154. [PMID: 37683120 PMCID: PMC10860546 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tolerance limit is defined on pre-treatment patient specific quality assurance results to identify "out of the norm" dose discrepancy in plan. An out-of-tolerance plan during measurement can often cause treatment delays especially if replanning is required. In this study, we aim to develop an outlier detection model to identify out-of-tolerance plan early during treatment planning phase to mitigate the above-mentioned risks. METHODS Patient-specific quality assurance results with portal dosimetry for stereotactic body radiotherapy measured between January 2020 and December 2021 were used in this study. Data were divided into thorax and pelvis sites and gamma passing rates were recorded using 2%/2 mm, 2%/1 mm, and 1%/1 mm gamma criteria. Statistical process control method was used to determine six different site and criterion-specific tolerance and action limits. Using only the inliers identified with our determined tolerance limits, we trained three different outlier detection models using the plan complexity metrics extracted from each treatment field-robust covariance, isolation forest, and one class support vector machine. The hyperparameters were optimized using the F1-score calculated from both the inliers and validation outliers' data. RESULTS 308 pelvis and 200 thorax fields were used in this study. The tolerance (action) limits for 2%/2 mm, 2%/1 mm, and 1%/1 mm gamma criteria in the pelvis site are 99.1% (98.1%), 95.8% (91.1%), and 91.7% (86.1%), respectively. The tolerance (action) limits in the thorax site are 99.0% (98.7%), 97.0% (96.2%), and 91.5% (87.2%). One class support vector machine performs the best among all the algorithms. The best performing model in the thorax (pelvis) site achieves a precision of 0.56 (0.54), recall of 1.0 (1.0), and F1-score of 0.72 (0.70) when using the 2%/2 mm (2%/1 mm) criterion. CONCLUSION The model will help the planner to identify an out-of-tolerance plan early so that they can refine the plan further during the planning stage without risking late discovery during measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical ProgrammeDuke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore
| | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Division of Physics and Applied PhysicsNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Yun Ming Wong
- Division of Physics and Applied PhysicsNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Wen Chuan Chong
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Calvin Wei Yang Koh
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | | | - Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Khong Wei Ang
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - James Cheow Lei Lee
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Division of Physics and Applied PhysicsNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical ProgrammeDuke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Casar B, Mendez I, Gershkevitsh E, Wegener S, Jaffray D, Heaton R, Pesznyak C, Stelczer G, Bulski W, Chełminski K, Smirnov G, Antipina N, Beavis AW, Harding N, Jurković S, Hwang MS, Saiful Huq M. On dosimetric characteristics of detectors for relative dosimetry in small fields: a multicenter experimental study. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:035009. [PMID: 38091616 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad154c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Objective. In this multicentric collaborative study, we aimed to verify whether the selected radiation detectors satisfy the requirements of TRS-483 Code of Practice for relative small field dosimetry in megavoltage photon beams used in radiotherapy, by investigating four dosimetric characteristics. Furthermore, we intended to analyze and complement the recommendations given in TRS-483.Approach. Short-term stability, dose linearity, dose-rate dependence, and leakage were determined for 17 models of detectors considered suitable for small field dosimetry. Altogether, 47 detectors were used in this study across ten institutions. Photon beams with 6 and 10 MV, with and without flattening filters, generated by Elekta Versa HDTMor Varian TrueBeamTMlinear accelerators, were used.Main results. The tolerance level of 0.1% for stability was fulfilled by 70% of the data points. For the determination of dose linearity, two methods were considered. Results from the use of a stricter method show that the guideline of 0.1% for dose linearity is not attainable for most of the detectors used in the study. Following the second approach (squared Pearson's correlation coefficientr2), it was found that 100% of the data fulfill the criteriar2> 0.999 (0.1% guideline for tolerance). Less than 50% of all data points satisfied the published tolerance of 0.1% for dose-rate dependence. Almost all data points (98.2%) satisfied the 0.1% criterion for leakage.Significance. For short-term stability (repeatability), it was found that the 0.1% guideline could not be met. Therefore, a less rigorous criterion of 0.25% is proposed. For dose linearity, our recommendation is to adopt a simple and clear methodology and to define an achievable tolerance based on the experimental data. For dose-rate dependence, a realistic criterion of 1% is proposed instead of the present 0.1%. Agreement was found with published guidelines for background signal (leakage).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Božidar Casar
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Ignasi Mendez
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Sonja Wegener
- University of Wuerzburg, Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Wojciech Bulski
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Andrew W Beavis
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Harding
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Slaven Jurković
- Medical Physics Department, University Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Min-Sig Hwang
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oolbekkink S, van Asselen B, Woodings SJ, Wolthaus JWH, de Vries JHW, van Appeldoorn AA, Feijoo M, van den Dobbelsteen M, Raaymakers BW. Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14180. [PMID: 38011008 PMCID: PMC10795437 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Oolbekkink
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Bram van Asselen
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Simon J. Woodings
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu HYH, Hardcastle N, Bailey M, Siva S, Seeley A, Barry T, Booth J, Lao L, Roach M, Buxton S, Thwaites D, Foote M. Guidelines for safe practice of stereotactic body (ablative) radiation therapy: RANZCR 2023 update. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023. [PMID: 38160448 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Yu-Hao Liu
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- ICON Cancer Centre, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Michael Bailey
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Seeley
- North West Cancer Centre, Burnie, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Tamara Barry
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jeremy Booth
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louis Lao
- Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland Radiation Oncology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michelle Roach
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stacey Buxton
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- ICON Cancer Centre, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schofield A, Newall M, Inwood D, Downes S, Corde S. Commissioning of Aktina SRS cones and dosimetric validation of the RayStation photon Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1503-1518. [PMID: 37603132 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01315-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Clinical implementation of SRS cones demands particular experimental care and dosimetric considerations in order to deliver precise and safe radiotherapy to patients. The purpose of this work was to present the commissioning data of recent Aktina cones combined with a 6MV flattened beam produced by an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. Additionally, the modelling process, and an assessment of dosimetric accuracy of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for cone based SRS was performed. There are currently no studies presenting beam data for this equipment and none that outlines the modelling parameters and validation of dose calculation using RayStation's photon Monte Carlo dose engine with cones. Beam data was measured using an SFD and a microDiamond and benchmarked against EBT3 film for cones of diameter 5-39 mm. Modelling was completed and validated within homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. End-to-end image-guided validation was performed using a StereoPHAN™ housing, an SRS MapCHECK and EBT3 film, and calculation time was investigated as a function of statistical uncertainty and field diameter. The TPS calculations agreed with measured data within their estimated uncertainties and clinical treatment plans could be calculated in under a minute. The data presented serves as a reference for others commissioning Aktina stereotactic cones and the modelling parameters serve similarly, while providing a starting point for those commissioning the same TPS algorithm for use with cones. It has been shown in this work that RayStation's Monte Carlo photon dose algorithm performs satisfactorily in the presence of SRS cones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Schofield
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Matthew Newall
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Dean Inwood
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Simon Downes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Stéphanie Corde
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
- Illawara Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neupane T, Shang C, Kassel M, Muhammad W, Leventouri T, Williams TR. Viability of the virtual cone technique using a fixed small multi-leaf collimator field for stereotactic radiosurgery of trigeminal neuralgia. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14148. [PMID: 37722766 PMCID: PMC10691631 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Dosimetric uncertainties in very small (≤1.5 × 1.5 cm2 ) photon fields are remarkably higher, which undermines the validity of the virtual cone (VC) technique with a diminutive and variable MLC fields. We evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the VC method with a very small, fixed MLC field setting, called a fixed virtual cone (fVC), for small target radiosurgery such as trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). The fVC is characterized by 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm high-definition (HD) MLC field of 10MV FFF beam defined at 100 cm SAD, while backup jaws are positioned at 1.5 cm x 1.5 cm. A spherical dose distribution equivalent to 5 mm (diameter) physical cone was generated using 10-14 non-coplanar, partial arcs. Dosimetric accuracy was validated using SRS diode (PTW 60018), SRS MapCHECK (SNC) measurements. As a quality assurance measure, 10 treatment plans (SRS) for TGN, consisting of various arc ranges at different collimator angles were analyzed using 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF beams, including a field-by-field study (n = 130 fields). Dose outputs were compared between the Eclipse TPS and measurements (SRS MapCHECK). Moreover, dosimetric changes in the field defining fVC, prompted by a minute (± 0.5-1.0 mm) leaf shift, was examined among TPS, diode measurements, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The beam model for fVC was validated (≤3% difference) using SRS MapCHECK based absolute dose measurements. The equivalent diameters of the 50% isodose distribution were found comparable to that of a 5 mm cone. Additionally, the comparison of field output factors, dose per MU between the TPS and SRS diode measurements using the fVC field, including ± 1 mm leaf shift, yielded average discrepancies within 5.5% and 3.5% for 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF beams, respectively. Overall, the fVC method is a credible alternative to the physical cone (5 mm) that can be applied in routine radiosurgical treatment of TGN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taindra Neupane
- Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Charles Shang
- RSOSouth Florida Proton Therapy InstituteDelray BeachFloridaUSA
| | - Maxwell Kassel
- Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Wazir Muhammad
- Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Theodora Leventouri
- Center for Biological and Materials Physics (CBAMP)Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Timothy R. Williams
- Medical DirectorSouth Florida Proton Therapy InstituteDelray BeachFloridaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kugel F, Wulff J, Bäumer C, Janson M, Kretschmer J, Brodbek L, Behrends C, Verbeek N, Looe HK, Poppe B, Timmermann B. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine. Z Med Phys 2023; 33:529-541. [PMID: 36577626 PMCID: PMC10751706 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary fluence of a proton pencil beam exiting the accelerator is enveloped by a region of secondaries, commonly called "spray". Although small in magnitude, this spray may affect dose distributions in pencil beam scanning mode e.g., in the calculation of the small field output, if not modelled properly in a treatment planning system (TPS). The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark the Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine of the RayStation TPS (v.10A) in small proton fields and systematically compare single Gaussian (SG) and double Gaussian (DG) modeling of initial proton fluence providing a more accurate representation of the nozzle spray. METHODS The initial proton fluence distribution for SG/DG beam modeling was deduced from two-dimensional measurements in air with a scintillation screen with electronic readout. The DG model was either based on direct fits of the two Gaussians to the measured profiles, or by an iterative optimization procedure, which uses the measured profiles to mimic in-air scan-field factor (SF) measurements. To validate the DG beam models SFs, i.e. relative doses to a 10 × 10 cm2 field, were measured in water for three different initial proton energies (100MeV, 160MeV, 226.7MeV) and square field sizes from 1×1cm2 to 10×10cm2 using a small field ionization chamber (IBA CC01) and an IBA ProteusPlus system (universal nozzle). Furthermore, the dose to the center of spherical target volumes (diameters: 1cm to 10cm) was determined using the same small volume ionization chamber (IC). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed, including estimates of influence factors typical for small field dosimetry deduced from a simple two-dimensional analytical model of the relative fluence distribution. Measurements were compared to the predictions of the RayStation TPS. RESULTS SFs deviated by more than 2% from TPS predictions in all fields <4×4cm2 with a maximum deviation of 5.8% for SG modeling. In contrast, deviations were smaller than 2% for all field-sizes and proton energies when using the directly fitted DG model. The optimized DG model performed similarly except for slightly larger deviations in the 1×1cm2 scan-fields. The uncertainty estimates showed a significant impact of pencil beam size variations (±5%) resulting in up to 5.0% standard uncertainty. The point doses within spherical irradiation volumes deviated from calculations by up to 3.3% for the SG model and 2.0% for the DG model. CONCLUSION Properly representing nozzle spray in RayStation's MC-based dose engine using a DG beam model was found to reduce the deviation to measurements in small spherical targets to below 2%. A thorough uncertainty analysis shows a similar magnitude for the combined standard uncertainty of such measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Kugel
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; Faculty of Physics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | - Jana Kretschmer
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Brodbek
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie Curie-Straße 5, A-2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Carina Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Nico Verbeek
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Knill C, Sandhu R, Loughery B, Lin L, Halford R, Drake D, Snyder M. Commissioning and validation of a Monte Carlo algorithm for spine stereotactic radiosurgery. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14092. [PMID: 37431696 PMCID: PMC10647963 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A 6FFF Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation algorithm was commissioned for spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Model generation, validation, and ensuing model tuning are presented. METHODS The model was generated using in-air and in-water commissioning measurements of field sizes between 10 and 400 mm2 . Commissioning measurements were compared to simulated water tank MC calculations to validate output factors, percent depth doses (PDDs), profile sizes and penumbras. Previously treated Spine SRS patients were re-optimized with the MC model to achieve clinically acceptable plans. Resulting plans were calculated on the StereoPHAN phantom and subsequently delivered to the microDiamond and SRSMapcheck to verify calculated dose accuracy. Model tuning was performed by adjusting the model's light field offset (LO) distance between physical and radiological positions of the MLCs, to improve field size and StereoPHAN calculation accuracy. Following tuning, plans were generated and delivered to an anthropomorphic 3D-printed spine phantom featuring realistic bone anatomy, to validate heterogeneity corrections. Finally, plans were validated using polymer gel (VIPAR based formulation) measurements. RESULTS Compared to open field measurements, MC calculated output factors and PDDs were within 2%, profile penumbra widths were within 1 mm, and field sizes were within 0.5 mm. Calculated point dose measurements in the StereoPHAN were within 0.26% ± 0.93% and -0.10% ± 1.37% for targets and spinal canals, respectively. Average SRSMapcheck per-plan pass rates using a 2%/2 mm/10% threshold relative gamma analysis was 99.1% ± 0.89%. Adjusting LOs improved open field and patient-specific dosimetric agreement. Anthropomorphic phantom measurements were within -1.29% ± 1.00% and 0.27% ± 1.36% of MC calculated for the vertebral body (target) and spinal canal, respectively. VIPAR gel measurements confirmed good dosimetric agreement near the target-spine junction. CONCLUSION Validation of a MC algorithm for simple fields and complex SRS spine deliveries in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms has been performed. The MC algorithm has been released for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cory Knill
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| | - Raminder Sandhu
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| | - Brian Loughery
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| | - Lifeng Lin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| | - Robert Halford
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| | - Doug Drake
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| | - Michael Snyder
- Department of Radiation OncologyCorewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Younes T, Chatrie F, Zinutti M, Simon L, Fares G, Vieillevigne L. Optimization of the Eclipse TPS beam configuration parameters for small field dosimetry using Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements. Phys Med 2023; 114:103141. [PMID: 37820506 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of tuning the beam configurations parameters on the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm for small fields using Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. METHODS The TrueBeam STx with the high-definition 120 multi-leaf collimator (HD120-MLC) was modeled with Geant4 application for emission tomography (GATE) Monte Carlo platform and validated against measurements. The impact of varying the effective spot size (ESS) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) on AAA and AXB calculations was carried out for small MLC-fields ranging from 0.5×0.5 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2. Beam penumbras, field sizes and output factors calculated by AAA and AXB were compared to GATE calculations and measurements. RESULTS The beam penumbra comparisons showed that the best ESS value for AXB was about 1.0 mm in the crossplane direction and 0.5 mm in the inplane direction. By optimizing the ESS values, AXB could provide output factor results almost within 2% of GATE calculations and measurements for fields down to 0.5×0.5 cm2. For AAA, significant output factor differences were observed for all ESS values and tuning the DLG in addition to the ESS optimization resulted in an absorbed dose difference of less than 2.5% for MLC-fields down to 1 × 1 cm2. CONCLUSION By optimizing the ESS values, AXB can achieve accurate output factors in the case of small MLC-fields without the need of DLG tuning. Nevertheless, compromises between the output factor, DLG and ESS values were found necessary for AAA calculations. A MLC model improvement would allow to avoid the complexity related to tuning the configuration parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Younes
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France; Laboratoire de "Mathématiques et Applications", Unité de recherche "Mathématiques et Modélisation", Centre d'analyses et de recherche, Faculté des sciences, Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth 1104 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Frédéric Chatrie
- Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Marianne Zinutti
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Luc Simon
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Georges Fares
- Laboratoire de "Mathématiques et Applications", Unité de recherche "Mathématiques et Modélisation", Centre d'analyses et de recherche, Faculté des sciences, Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth 1104 2020, Lebanon
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawata K, Hirashima H, Tsuruta Y, Sasaki M, Matsushita N, Fujimoto T, Nakamura M, Nakata M. Applicability evaluation of the TRS-483 protocol for the determination of small-field output factors using different multi-leaf collimator and field-shaping types. Phys Med 2023; 113:102664. [PMID: 37573811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the applicability of TRS-483 output correction factors (CFs) for small-field output factors (OFs) using different multi-leaf collimators (MLC) and field-shaping types. METHODS All measurements were performed on TrueBeam, TrueBeam STx, and Halcyon using 6 MV flattening filter-free energy. Four detectors, including CC01, CC04, microDiamond, and EDGE, were used. Nominal field sizes ranging from 1 × 1 to 4 × 4, and 10 × 10 cm2 were used to measure small-field OFs at source-to-axis distance of 100 cm with a 0° gantry angle in a 3D water phantom. Further, the field-shaping types were defined using jaw collimator or MLC (five different configurations). A field size of 10 × 10 cm2 was used as the reference for calculation of OFs obtained as ratio of detector readings (OFdet). The percentage difference and coefficient of variation of OFdet and OFdet corrected by applying CF were compared for each field size and configuration. RESULTS For OFdet corrected by applying CF, the ranges of percentage difference and coefficient of variation in all configurations for ≥ 2 × 2 cm2 fields were reduced from 1.2-2.2 to 0.8-1.3 percentage points (%pt) and from 0.5-1.0 to 0.4-0.7%, respectively. For 1 × 1 cm2 field, the ranges of percentage difference and coefficient of variation were reduced from 3.3-5.7 to 1.2-2.2 %pt and from 2.2-3.7 to 0.8-1.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The CFs described in TRS-483 dosimetry protocol have broad applicability in reducing OF variations between detectors under different MLC and field-shaping types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Kawata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Tsuruta
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Makoto Sasaki
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Norimasa Matsushita
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fujimoto
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Manabu Nakata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rousseau A, Stien C, Gouriou J, Bordy JM, Boissonnat G, Chabert I, Dufreneix S, Blideanu V. End-to-end quality assurance for stereotactic radiotherapy with Fricke-Xylenol orange-Gelatin gel dosimeter and dual-wavelength cone-beam optical CT readout. Phys Med 2023; 113:102656. [PMID: 37625218 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The end-to-end (E2E) quality assurance (QA) test is a unique tool for validating the treatment chain undergone by patients in external radiotherapy. It should be conducted in three dimensions (3D) to get accurate results. This study aims to implement these tests with Fricke-Xylenol orange-Gelatin (FXG) gel dosimeter and a newly developed dual-wavelength reading method on the Vista16™ optical Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ModusQA) for three treatment techniques in stereotactic radiotherapy, on Novalis (Varian) and CyberKnife (Accuray) linear accelerators. METHODS The tests were performed in head phantoms. Gel measurements were compared with planned dose distributions and measured by film and ion chamber measurements by plotting isodose curves and dose profiles, and by conducting a 3D local gamma-index analysis (2%/2mm criteria). RESULTS Gamma passing rates were higher than 95 %. Point dose differences between treatment planning and gel and ion chamber measurements at the isocenter were < 2.3 % for both treatments delivered on the Novalis accelerator, while this difference was higher than 4 % for the treatment delivered on the CyberKnife, highlighting a small overdosing of the tumor volume. A good agreement was observed between gel and film dose profiles. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the successful implementation of 3D E2E QA tests for stereotactic radiotherapy with FXG gel dosimetry and a dual-wavelength reading method on an optical CT scanner. This dosimetric method provides 3D absolute dose distributions in the 0.25 - 10 Gy dose range with a high spatial resolution and a dose uncertainty of around 2 % (k=1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Rousseau
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France.
| | - Christel Stien
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| | - Jean Gouriou
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| | - Jean-Marc Bordy
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| | - Guillaume Boissonnat
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| | | | - Stéphane Dufreneix
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Valentin Blideanu
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Palaiseau, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Timakova E, Bazalova-Carter M, Zavgorodni S. Characterization of a 0.8 mm 3Medscint plastic scintillator detector system for small field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:175040. [PMID: 37494941 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aceacf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) have demonstrated ability to meet requirements of small field dosimetry. Medscint developed a 1 mm long, 1 mm diameter cylindrical PSD with effective volume of 0.8 mm3. Clinically relevant, small field dosimetric properties of this detector, combined with a novel scintillation dosimetry system-HYPERSCINT RP-200, and HYPERDOSE analysis software were evaluated in this study.Approach. This novel scintillator-based dosimetry system was characterized with 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF x-ray beams delivered by Varian TrueBeamTMlinear accelerator. The detector was characterized for leakage, short-term repeatability, dose response linearity, angular response, dose rate response, and field size dependence for radiation field sizes of 0.25 × 0.25 to 10 × 10 cm2. Measured detector specific output ratios were compared with microDiamond output factors to determine small field output correction factors,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr.Main results. The dosimetry system showed excellent short-term repeatability with standard deviation of only 0.04 ± 0.01%. It demonstrated good dose linearity with variations less than 1.0% for 14.4 cGy and above. The dosimetry system was found to be independent of dose rate and angle of irradiation, with deviations for both below 0.5%. Leakage was found to be comparable to background readings. For 6 MV-WFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 1 × 1 cm2agreed with output factors measured with PTW TN60019 microDiamond, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes. For 10 MV-FFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 2 × 2 cm2agreed with PTW TN60019 microDiamond output factors, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes.kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor field sizes down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2were determined to be within 6% of unity for both 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF energy beams.Significance. The HYPERSCINT RP-200 dosimetry system coupled with a 0.8 mm3PSD showed excellent dosimetric properties and was found to be clinically relevant for relative dosimetry down to field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2and potentially smaller.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Timakova
- University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sergei Zavgorodni
- University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ghemiș DM, Marcu LG, Virag V, Virag A. Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:126. [PMID: 37507741 PMCID: PMC10375603 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02313-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beam matching is a concept in radiotherapy applied to clinics where more than one linac is employed to harmonise beam characteristics across linacs for allowing patients interchange without replanning. In view of this, the current study analyzes and compares dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams of three beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) from three different clinics with the aim to evaluate the matching under tight criteria for gamma analysis. METHODS Three Elekta linacs from three different clinics were included. The linacs have the same collimator assembly, Elekta Agility. Beam data were collected during commissioning process using PTW dosimetry systems. Dose profiles and percentage depth doses (PDD) were analyzed using 1D gamma analysis (1 mm/1%) as well as the following parameters: depth of maximum dose, PDD10, flatness, unflattnes, symmetry, penumbra, output factors. Additionally, five stereotactic treatment plans were optimized in one clinic and calculated by all three planning systems (Monaco) for a dosimetric comparison. RESULTS Gamma analysis of dose profiles and PDDs showed clinically acceptable results of 96.3% passing rate for profiles and 100% passing rate for PDDs. All dosimetric parameters were in good agreement with the reference data. Furthermore, dosimetric comparisons between stereotactic treatment plans showed a maximum standard deviation of 0.48 Gy for the maximum dose to PTV, and a maximum standard deviation of 0.1 Gy for the dose to the organs at risk. CONCLUSIONS All three linacs showed a strong agreement between parameters and passed the gamma analysis using 1% DD/1mm DTA criteria. This study confirmed the matching between linacs, offering the possibility to interchange patients with no replanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Ghemiș
- Faculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
- MedEuropa, Oradea, 410191, Romania.
| | - Loredana G Marcu
- Faculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania
- Faculty of Informatics & Science, University of Oradea, Oradea, 410087, Romania
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kannan M, Saminathan S, Chandraraj V, Raj DG, Ganesh KM. Evaluation of International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Report Series-483 Detector-specific Output Correction Factor for Various Collimator Systems. J Med Phys 2023; 48:281-288. [PMID: 37969152 PMCID: PMC10642599 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_59_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim In this study, a 6MV flattening filter (FF) and 6MV FF Free (FFF) photon beam small-field output factors (OF) were measured with various collimators using different detectors. The corrected OFs were compared with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated OFs. Materials and Methods OF measurements were performed with four different types of collimators: Varian Millennium multi-leaf collimator (MLC), Elekta Agility MLC, Apex micro-MLC (mMLC) and a stereotactic cone. Ten detectors (four ionization chambers and six diodes) were used to perform the OF measurements at a depth of 10 cm with a source-to-surface distance of 90 cm. The corrected OF was calculated from the measurements. The corrected OFs were compared with existing TPS-generated OFs. Results The use of detector-specific output correction factor (OCF) in the PTW diode P detector reduced the OF uncertainty by <4.1% for 1 cm × 1 cm Sclin. The corrected OF was compared with TPS calculated OF; the maximum variation with the IBA CC01 chamber was 3.75%, 3.72%, 1.16%, and 0.90% for 5 mm stereotactic cone, 0.49 cm × 0.49 cm Apex mMLC, 1 cm × 1 cm Agility MLC, and 1 cm × 1 cm Millennium MLC, respectively. Conclusion The technical report series-483 protocol recommends that detector-specific OCF should be used to calculate the corrected OF from the measured OF. The implementation of OCF in the TPS commissioning will reduce the small-field OF variation by <3% for any type of detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mageshraja Kannan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Sathiyan Saminathan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Varatharaj Chandraraj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - D. Gowtham Raj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K. M. Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kannan M, Saminathan S, Chandraraj V, Gowtham Raj D, Ganesh KM. Determination of small-field output factors for beam-matched linear accelerators using various detectors and comparison of detector-specific output correction factors using IAEA Technical Report Series 483 protocol. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:241-254. [PMID: 37456703 PMCID: PMC10348327 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Beam matching is widely used to ensure that linear accelerators used in radiotherapy have equal dosimetry characteristics. Small-field output factors (OF) were measured using different detectors infour beam-matched linear accelerators and the measured OFs were compared with existing treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo algorithm calculated OFs. Materials and methods Three Elekta Versa HDTM and one Elekta InfinityTMlinear accelerators with photon energies of 6 MV flattening filter (FF), 10 MVFF, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) and 10 MVFFF were used in this study. All the Linac'swere beam-matched, Dosimetry beam data were ± 1% compare with Reference Linac. Ten different type of detectors (four ionizationchambers and six diode detectors) were used for small-field OF measurements. The OFs were measured for field sizes of 1 × 1 to 10 × 10 cm2, and normalized to 10 × 10 cm2 field size. The uncorrected and corrected OFs were calculated from these measurements. The corrected OF was compare with existing treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo algorithm calculated OFs. Results The small-field corrected and Uncorrected OF variations among the linear accelerators was within 1% for all energies and detectors. An increase in field size led to a reduction in the difference between OFs among the detectors, which was the case for all energies. The RSD values decreased with increasing field size. The TRS 483 provided Detector-specificoutput-correction factor (OCF) reduced uncertainty in small-field measurements. Conclusion It is necessary to implement the OF-correction of small fields in a TPS. Special care must be taken to incorporate the corrected small-field OF in a TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mageshraja Kannan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Sathiyan Saminathan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Varatharaj Chandraraj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - D Gowtham Raj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K M Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Manco L, Vega K, Maffei N, Gutierrez MV, Cenacchi E, Bernabei A, Bruni A, D'angelo E, Meduri B, Lohr F, Guidi G. Validation of RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for multiple LINACs. Phys Med 2023; 109:102588. [PMID: 37080156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A photon Monte Carlo (MC) model was commissioned for flattened (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) 6 MV beam energy. The accuracy of this model, as a single model to be used for three beam matched LINACs, was evaluated. METHODS Multiple models were created in RayStation v.10A for three linacs equipped with Elekta "Agility" collimator. A clinically commissioned collapsed cone (CC) algorithm (GoldCC), a MC model automatically created from the CC algorithm without further optimization (CCtoMC) and an optimized MC model (GoldMC) were compared with measurements. The validation of the model was performed by following the recommendations of IAEA TRS 430 and comprised of basic validation in a water tank, validation in a heterogeneous phantom and validation of complex IMRT/VMAT paradigms using gamma analysis of calculated and measured dose maps in a 2D-Array. RESULTS Dose calculation with the GoldMC model resulted in a confidence level of 3% for point measurements in water tank and heterogeneous phantom for measurements performed in all three linacs. The same confidence level resulted for GoldCC model. Dose maps presented an agreement for all models on par to each other with γ criteria 2%/2mm. CONCLUSIONS The GoldMC model showed a good agreement with measured data and is determined to be accurate for clinical use for all three linacs in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Manco
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy; Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Kevin Vega
- International Center of Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy; Centro Nacional de Radioterapia, Physics Unit, San Salvador, El Salvador
| | - Nicola Maffei
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | | | - Elisa Cenacchi
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Annalisa Bernabei
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisa D'angelo
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Frank Lohr
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Gabriele Guidi
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Renil Mon P, Meena-Devi V, Bhasi S. Monte Carlo modelling and validation of the elekta synergy medical linear accelerator equipped with radiosurgical cones. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15328. [PMID: 37123913 PMCID: PMC10130217 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulations of medical linear accelerator heads help in visualizing the energy spectrum and angular spread of photons and electrons, energy deposition, and scattering from each of the head components. Hence, the purpose of this study was to validate the Monte Carlo model of the Elekta synergy medical linear accelerator equipped with stereotactic radio surgical connical collimators. For this, the Elekta synergy medical linear accelerator was modelled using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. The model results were validated using the measured data. The primary electron beam parameters, beam size, and energy were tuned to match the measured data; a dose profile with a field size of 40 × 40 cm2 and percentage depth dose with a field size of 10 × 10 cm2 were matched during tuning. The validation of the modelled data with the measurement results was performed using gamma analysis, point dose, and field size comparisons. For small radiation fields, relative output factors were also compared. The gamma analysis revealed good agreement between the Monte Carlo modeling results and the measured data. A gamma pass rate of more than 95% was obtained for field sizes of 40 × 40 cm2 to 2 × 2 cm2 with gamma criteria of 1% and 1 mm for the dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement (DTA), respectively; this gamma pass rate was more than 98% for the corresponding values of 2% and 2 mm for the DD and DTA, respectively. A gamma pass rate of more than 99% was obtained for a percentage depth dose with 1 mm and 1% criteria. The field size was also in good agreement with the measurement results, and the maximum deviation observed was 1.1%. The stereotactic cone field also passed this analysis with a gamma pass rate of more than 98% for dose profiles and 99% for the percentage depth dose. The small field output factor exhibited a deviation of 4.3%, 3.4%, and 1.9% for field sizes of 5 mm, 7.5 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. Thus, the Monte Carlo model of the Elekta Linear accelerator was successfully validated. The validation of radio surgical cones passed the analysis in terms of the dose profiles and percentage depth dose. The small field relative output factors exhibited deviations of up to 4.3%, and to resolve this, detector-specific and field-specific correction factors must be derived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P.S. Renil Mon
- Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumarakoil, Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India
- Corresponding author.
| | - V.N. Meena-Devi
- Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumarakoil, Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India
| | - Saju Bhasi
- Department of Radiation Physics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Azhar D, Gul A, Javid MA, Hussain MM, Shehzadi NN. Evaluation of scanning resolution, detector choice and detector orientation to be used for accurate and time-efficient commissioning of a 6MV clinical linear accelerator. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2023; 62:83-96. [PMID: 36520198 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-01008-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The present study is aimed at exploring different scanning parameters, detectors and their orientations for time-efficient and accurate commissioning of a 6 MV clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). Beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) curves were measured with a PTW dosimetry diode, a PTW Semiflex and a PinPoint ion chamber in different orientations. To acquire beam data, equidistant (step size of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm) and fanline (step size of 2-0.5 mm, 2-1 mm, 3-0.5 mm and 3-1 mm) scanning modes were employed and data measurement time was recorded. Scan time per measurement point was also varied (0.2 s, 0.5 s and 1.0 s) to investigate its effect on the accuracy and acquisition time of beam data. Accuracy of the measured data was analyzed on the basis of the variation between measured data and data modeled by a treatment planning system. Beam profiles (particularly in penumbra region) were found to be sensitive to variation in scanning resolution and showed an improved accuracy with decrease in step size, while PDD curves were affected negligibly. The accuracy of beam data obtained with the PTW dosimetry diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was higher than those obtained with the PTW Semiflex ion chamber for small fields (2 × 2 cm2 and 3 × 3 cm2). However, the response of the PTW diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was significantly indifferent in these fields. Furthermore, axial orientation of the PTW Semiflex ion chamber improved accuracy of profiles and PDDs as compared to radial orientation, while such a difference was not significant for the PinPoint ion chamber. It is concluded that a scan time of 0.2 s/point with a fanline scanning resolution of 2-1 mm for beam profiles and 3 mm for PDDs are most favorable in terms of accuracy and time efficiency. For small fields (2 × 2 cm2 and 3 × 3 cm2), a PinPoint ion chamber in radial orientation or a dosimetry diode in axial orientation are recommended for both beam profiles and PDDs. If a PinPoint ion chamber and a PTW dosimetry diode are not available, a Semiflex ion chamber in axial orientation may be used for small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeba Azhar
- Department of Basic Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, 47080, Pakistan
| | - Attia Gul
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy (INOR), Abbottabad, 22010, Pakistan.
| | - Muhamad Arshad Javid
- Institute of Physics, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Begg J, Jelen U, Moutrie Z, Oliver C, Holloway L, Brown R. ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1-17. [PMID: 36806156 PMCID: PMC10030536 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01223-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers' advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR20,10 is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are [Formula: see text], a correction for beam quality and [Formula: see text], for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for [Formula: see text] are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarrad Begg
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
| | - Urszula Jelen
- St Vincents Clinic, GenesisCare, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Zoe Moutrie
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - Chris Oliver
- Primary Standards Dosimetry Laboratory, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, 3085, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2505, Australia
| | - Rhonda Brown
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, 3085, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kamst O, Desai P. Evaluation of HyperArc™ using film and portal dosimetry quality assurance. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:57-66. [PMID: 36454430 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
HyperArc™ is a stereotactic radiotherapy modality designed for targeting multiple brain metastases using a single isocenter with multiple non-coplanar arcs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of two patient-specific quality assurance methods, film and the Varian Portal Dosimetry System with Varian's HyperArc™ technique and raise important considerations in the customisation of patient-specific quality assurance to accommodate HyperArc™ delivery. Assessment criteria included gamma analysis and mean dose at full width half maximum. The minimum metastasis size, maximum off-axis distance and suitable energy were identified and validated. Patient-specific quality assurance procedures were applied to a range of clinically relevant brain metastasis plans. Initial investigation into energy selection showed no significant differences in gamma pass rates using 6MV, 6MV FFF, or 10MV FFF for metastasis sizes greater than 15 mm diameter at the isocenter. Gamma pass rates (2%/2mm) for 15 mm metastases at the isocenter for all energies were greater than 96.0% for portal dosimetry and greater than 98.7% for film. Fields of size 15 mm placed at various distances (10-70 mm) from the isocenter resulted in a maximum mean dose difference of 1.5% between film and planned. Clinically relevant plans resulted in a maximum mean dose difference for selected metastases of 1.0% between film and plan and a maximum point dose difference of 2.9% between portal dose and plan. Portal dose image prediction was a quick and convenient quality assurance tool for metastases larger than 15 mm near the isocenter but provided diminished geometrical relevance for off-axis metastases. Film QA required exacting procedures but offered the ability to assess the accuracy of geometrical targeting for off-axis metastases and provided dosimetric accuracy for metastases to well below 15 mm diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onno Kamst
- ICON Cancer Care, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia.
| | - P Desai
- ICON Cancer Care, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kawata K, Ono T, Hirashima H, Tsuruta Y, Fujimoto T, Nakamura M, Nakata M. Effect of angular dependence for small-field dosimetry using seven different detectors. Med Phys 2023; 50:1274-1289. [PMID: 36583601 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small-field dosimetry is challenging for radiotherapy dosimetry because of the loss of lateral charged equilibrium, partial occlusion of the primary photon source by the collimating devices, perturbation effects caused by the detector materials and their design, and the detector size relative to the radiation field size, which leads to a volume averaging effect. Therefore, a suitable tool for small-field dosimetry requires high spatial resolution, tissue equivalence, angular independence, and energy and dose rate independence to achieve sufficient accuracy. Recently, with the increasing use of combinations of coplanar and non-coplanar beams for small-field dosimetry, there is a need to clarify angular dependence for dosimetry where the detector is oriented at various angles to the incident beam. However, the effect of angular dependence on small-field dosimetry with coplanar and non-coplanar beams has not been fully clarified. PURPOSE This study clarified the effect of angular dependence on small-field dosimetry with coplanar and non-coplanar beams using various detectors. METHODS Seven different detectors were used: CC01, RAZOR, RAZOR Nano, Pinpoint 3D, stereotactic field diode (SFD), microSilicon, and microDiamond. All measurements were taken using a TrueBeam STx with 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) energies using a water-equivalent spherical phantom with a source-to-axis distance of 100 cm. The detector was inserted in a perpendicular orientation, and the gantry was rotated at 15° increments from the incidence beam angle. A multi-leaf collimator (MLC) with four field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5, 1 × 1, 2 × 2, and 3 × 3 cm2 , and four couch angles from 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° (coplanar and non-coplanar) were adopted. The angular dependence response (AR) was defined as the ratio of the detector response at a given irradiation gantry angle normalized to the detector response at 0°. The maximum AR differences were calculated between the maximum and minimum AR values for each detector, field size, energy, and couch angle. RESULTS The maximum AR difference for the coplanar beam was within 3.3% for all conditions, excluding the maximum AR differences in 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field for CC01 and RAZOR. The maximum AR difference for non-coplanar beams was within 2.5% for fields larger than 1 × 1 cm2 , excluding the maximum AR differences for RAZOR Nano, SFD, and microSilicon. The Pinpoint 3D demonstrated stable AR tendencies compared to other detectors. The maximum difference was within 2.0%, except for the 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field and couch angle at 90°. The tendencies of AR values for each detector were similar when using different energies. CONCLUSION This study clarified the inherent angular dependence of seven detectors that were suitable for small-field dosimetry. The Pinpoint 3D chamber had the smallest angular dependence of all detectors for the coplanar and non-coplanar beams. The findings of this study can contribute to the calculation of the AR correction factor, and it may be possible to adapt detectors with a large angular dependence on coplanar and non-coplanar beams. However, note that the gantry sag and detector-specific uncertainties increase as the field size decreases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Kawata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ono
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsuruta
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fujimoto
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Manabu Nakata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Church C, MacDonald RL, Parsons D, Syme A. Evaluation of plan quality and treatment efficiency in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans with a variable source-to-axis distance. Med Phys 2023; 50:3039-3054. [PMID: 36774531 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy deliveries with dynamic couch motions that shorten the source-to-axis distance (SAD) on a C-arm linac have the potential to increase treatment efficiency through the increase of the effective dose rate. In this investigation, we convert clinically deliverable volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans for cranial radiosurgery into virtual isocenter plans through implementation of couch trajectories that maintain the target at a shortened but variable SAD throughout treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomly sampled population of patients treated with cranial radiosurgery from within the last three years were separated into groups with one, two, and three lesions. All plans had a single isocenter (regardless of number of targets), and a single prescription dose. Patient treatment plans were converted from their original delivery at a standard isocenter to a dynamic virtual isocenter in MATLAB. The virtual isocenter plan featured a variable isocenter position based upon the closest achievable source-to-target distance (referred to herein as a virtual source-to-axis distance [vSAD]) which avoided collision zones on a TrueBeam STx platform. Apertures were magnified according to the vSAD and monitor units at a given control point were scaled based on the inverse square law. Doses were calculated for the plans with a virtual isocenter in the Eclipse (v13.6.23) treatment planning system (TPS) and were compared with the clinical plans. Plan metrics (MU, Paddick conformity index, gradient index, and the volume receiving 12 Gy or more), normal brain dose-volume differences, as well as maximum doses received by organs at risk (OARs) were assessed. The values were compared between standard and virtual isocenter plans with Wilcoxon Sign Ranked tests to determine significance. A subset of the plans were mapped to the MAX-HD anthropomorphic phantom which contained an insert housing EBT3 GafChromic film and a PTW 31010 microion chamber for dose verification on a linac. RESULTS Delivering plans at a virtual isocenter resulted in an average reduction of 20.9% (p = 3×10-6 ) and 20.6% (p = 3.0×10-6 ) of MUs across all VMAT and all DCA plans, respectively. There was no significant change in OAR max doses received by plans delivered at a virtual isocenter. The low dose wash (1.0-2.0 Gy or 5-11% of the prescription dose) was increased (by approximately 20 cc) for plans with three lesions. This was equivalent to a 2.7%-3.8% volumetric increase in normal tissue receiving the respective dose level when comparing the plan with a virtual isocenter to a plan with a standard isocenter. Gamma pass rates with a 5%/1mm analysis criteria were 96.40% ± 2.90% and 95.07% ± 3.10% for deliveries at standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Absolute point dose agreements were within -0.36% ± 3.45% and -0.55% ± 3.39% for deliveries at a standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Potential time savings per arc were found to have linear relationship with the monitor units delivered per arc (savings of 0.009 s/MU with an r2 = 0.866 when fit to plans with a single lesion). CONCLUSIONS Converting clinical plans at standard isocenter to a virtual isocenter design did not show any losses to plan quality while simultaneously improving treatment efficiency through MU reductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody Church
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - R Lee MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Alasdair Syme
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Margaroni V, Pappas EP, Episkopakis A, Pantelis E, Papagiannis P, Marinos N, Karaiskos P. Dosimetry in 1.5 T MR-Linacs: Monte Carlo determination of magnetic field correction factors and investigation of the air gap effect. Med Phys 2023; 50:1132-1148. [PMID: 36349535 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Magnetic Resonance-Linac (MR-Linac) dosimetry formalisms, a new correction factor, kB,Q , has been introduced to account for corresponding changes to detector readings under the beam quality, Q, and the presence of magnetic field, B. PURPOSE This study aims to develop and implement a Monte Carlo (MC)-based framework for the determination of kB,Q correction factors for a series of ionization chambers utilized for dosimetry protocols and dosimetric quality assurance checks in clinical 1.5 T MR-Linacs. Their dependencies on irradiation setup conditions are also investigated. Moreover, to evaluate the suitability of solid phantoms for dosimetry checks and end-to-end tests, changes to the detector readings due to the presence of small asymmetrical air gaps around the detector's tip are quantified. METHODS Phase space files for three irradiation fields of the ELEKTA Unity 1.5 T/7 MV flattening-filter-free MR-Linac were provided by the manufacturer and used as source models throughout this study. Twelve ionization chambers (three farmer-type and nine small-cavity detectors, from three manufacturers) were modeled (including their dead volume) using the EGSnrc MC code package. kB,Q values were calculated for the 10 × 10 cm2 irradiation field and for four cardinal orientations of the detectors' axes with respect to the 1.5 T magnetic field. Potential dependencies of kB,Q values with respect to field size, depth, and phantom material were investigated by performing additional simulations. Changes to the detectors' readings due to the presence of small asymmetrical air gaps (0.1 up to 1 mm) around the chambers' sensitive volume in an RW3 solid phantom were quantified for three small-cavity chambers and two orientations. RESULTS For both parallel (to the magnetic field) orientations, kB,Q values were found close to unity. The maximum correction needed was 1.1%. For each detector studied, the kB,Q values calculated for the two parallel orientations agreed within uncertainties. Larger corrections (up to 5%) were calculated when the detectors were oriented perpendicularly to the magnetic field. Results were compared with corresponding ones found in the literature, wherever available. No considerable dependence of kB,Q with respect to field size (down to 3 × 3 cm2 ), depth, or phantom material was noticed, for the detectors investigated. As compared to the perpendicular one, in the parallel to the magnetic field orientation, the air gap effect is minimized but is still considerable even for the smallest air gap considered (0.1 mm). CONCLUSION For the 10 × 10 cm2 field, magnetic field correction factors for 12 ionization chambers and four orientations were determined. For each detector, the kB,Q value may be also applied for dosimetry procedures under different irradiation parameters provided that the orientation is taken into account. Moreover, if solid phantoms are used, even the smallest asymmetrical air gap may still bias small-cavity chamber response. This work substantially expands the availability and applicability of kB,Q correction factors that are detector- and orientation-specific, enabling more options in MR-Linac dosimetry checks, end-to-end tests, and quality assurance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Margaroni
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftherios P Pappas
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasios Episkopakis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Global Clinical Operations, Elekta Ltd, Crawley, West Sussex, UK
| | - Evaggelos Pantelis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Papagiannis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolas Marinos
- Global Clinical Operations, Elekta Ltd, Crawley, West Sussex, UK
| | - Pantelis Karaiskos
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wulff J, Koska B, Heufelder J, Janson M, Bäcker CM, Siregar H, Behrends C, Bäumer C, Foerster A, Bechrakis NE, Timmermann B. Commissioning and validation of a novel commercial TPS for ocular proton therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:365-379. [PMID: 36195575 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Until today, the majority of ocular proton treatments worldwide were planned with the EYEPLAN treatment planning system (TPS). Recently, the commercial, computed tomography (CT)-based TPS for ocular proton therapy RayOcular was released, which follows the general concepts of model-based treatment planning approach in conjunction with a pencil-beam-type dose algorithm (PBA). PURPOSE To validate RayOcular with respect to two main features: accurate geometrical representation of the eye model and accuracy of its dose calculation algorithm in combination with an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) eye treatment delivery system. METHODS Different 3D-printed eye-ball-phantoms were fabricated to test the geometrical representation of the corresponding CT-based model, both in orthogonal 2D images for X-ray image overlay and in fundus view overlaid with a funduscopy. For the latter, the phantom was equipped with a lens matching refraction of the human eye. Funduscopy was acquired in a Zeiss Claus 500 camera. Tantalum clips and fiducials attached to the phantoms were localized in the TPS model, and residual deviations to the actual position in X-ray images for various orientations of the phantom were determined, after the nominal eye orientation was corrected in RayOcular to obtain a best overall fit. In the fundus view, deviations between known and displayed distances were measured. Dose calculation accuracy of the PBA on a 0.2 mm grid was investigated by comparing between measured lateral and depth-dose profiles in water for various combinations of range, modulation, and field-size. Ultimately, the modeling of dose distributions behind wedges was tested. A 1D gamma-test was applied, and the lateral and distal penumbra were further compared. RESULTS Average residuals between model clips and visible clips/fiducials in orthogonal X-ray images were within 0.3 mm, including different orientations of the phantom. The differences between measured distances on the registered funduscopy image in the RayOcular fundus view and the known ground-truth were within 1 mm up to 10.5 mm distance from the posterior pole. No clear benefit projection of either polar mode or camera mode could be identified, the latter mimicking camera properties. Measured dose distributions were reproduced with gamma-test pass-rates of >95% with 2%/0.3 mm for depth and lateral profiles in the middle of spread-out Bragg-peaks. Distal falloff and lateral penumbra were within 0.2 mm for fields without a wedge. For shallow depths, the agreement was worse, reaching pass-rates down to 80% with 5%/0.3 mm when comparing lateral profiles in air. This is caused by low-energy protons from a scatter source in the IBA system not modeled by RayOcular. Dose distributions modified by wedges were reproduced, matching the wedge-induced broadening of the lateral penumbra to within 0.4 mm for the investigated cases and showing the excess dose within the field due to wedge scatter. CONCLUSION RayOcular was validated for its use with an IBA single scattering delivery nozzle. Geometric modeling of the eye and representation of 2D projections fulfill clinical requirements. The PBA dose calculation reproduces measured distributions and allows explicit handling of wedges, overcoming approximations of simpler dose calculation algorithms used in other systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Koska
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Jens Heufelder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BerlinProtonen am Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Claus Maximilian Bäcker
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hilda Siregar
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carina Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Foerster
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nikolaos E Bechrakis
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre (WPE), Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany.,Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Esteves J, Pivot O, Ribouton J, Jalade P, Zouaoui A, Desbat L, Rit S, Blanc F, Haefeli G, Hopchev P, Galvan JM, Lu GN, Pittet P. A novel QA phantom based on scintillating fiber ribbons with implementation of 2D dose tomography for small-field radiotherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:619-632. [PMID: 35933612 PMCID: PMC10087208 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel instrument for real-time quality assurance (QA) procedures in radiotherapy. The system implements a scintillation-based phantom and associated signal acquisition and processing modules and aims to monitor two-dimensional (2D) dose distributions of small fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the proposed phantom, we have designed and realized a prototype implementing six high-resolution tissue-equivalent scintillating fiber ribbons stacked with in-plane 30° rotated orientations from each other. Each ribbon output is coupled to a silicon photodiode linear array (with an element pitch of 400 μm) to detect scintillating signal, which represents the projected irradiation profile perpendicular to the ribbon's orientation. For the system providing six acquired projected dose profiles at different orientations, we have developed a two-step signal processing method to perform 2D dose reconstruction. The first step is to determine irradiation field geometry parameters using a tomographic geometry approach, and the second one is to perform specific penumbra estimation. The QA system prototype has been tested on a Novalis TrueBeam STX with a 6-MV photon beam for small elliptic fields defined by 5- and 10-mm cone collimators and for 10 × 10- and 20 × 10-mm2 rectangular fields defined by the micro-multileaf collimator. Gamma index analysis using EBT3 films as reference has been carried out with tight 2%-dose-difference (DD)/700-μm-distance-to-agreement (DTA) as well as 1%-DD/1-mm-DTA criteria for evaluating the system performances. The testing also includes an evaluation of the proposed two-step field reconstruction method in comparison with two conventional methods: filtered back projection (FBP) and simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT). RESULTS The reconstructed 2D dose distributions have gamma index pass rates higher than 95% for all the tested configurations as compared with EBT3 film measurements with both 2%-DD/700-μm-DTA and 1%-DD/1-mm criteria. 2D global gamma analysis shows that the two-step and FBP radiation field reconstruction methods systematically outperform the SIRT approach. Moreover, higher gamma index success rates are obtained with the two-step method than with FBP in the case of the fields defined with the stereotactic cones. CONCLUSIONS The proposed small-field QA system makes a use of six water-equivalent scintillating detectors (fiber ribbons) to acquire dose distribution. The developed two-step signal processing method performs tomographic 2D dose reconstruction. A system prototype has been built and tested using hospital facilities with small rectangular and elliptic fields. Testing results show 2D reconstructed dose distributions with high accuracy and resolution. Such a system could potentially be an alternative approach to film dosimetry for small-field QA, which is still widely used as reference in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josué Esteves
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Odran Pivot
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | - Julien Ribouton
- Service de Radiophysique et Radiovigilance, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Patrice Jalade
- Service de Radiophysique et Radiovigilance, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Abdelaali Zouaoui
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Laurent Desbat
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | - Simon Rit
- Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, CREATIS, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Jean-Marc Galvan
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Guo-Neng Lu
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Patrick Pittet
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Momeni Harzanji Z, Larizadeh MH, Namiranian N, Nickfarjam A. Evaluation and Comparison of Dosimetric Characteristics of Semiflex ®3D and Microdiamond in Relative Dosimetry under 6 and 15 MV Photon Beams in Small Fields. J Biomed Phys Eng 2022; 12:477-488. [PMID: 36313410 PMCID: PMC9589081 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2008-1160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In modern radiotherapy techniques, the frequently small and non-uniformed fields can increase treatment efficiency due to their highly conformal dose distribution. Particular features including lack of Lateral Charge Particle Equilibrium (LCPE) lead to detectors with high resolution since any error in obtained dosimetric data could cause patient mistreatments. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate and compare two small detectors (Semiflex®3D and microdiamond) dosimetric characteristics in small field relative dosimetry. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this experimental study, the dosimetric properties of Semiflex®3D and microdiamond were assessed under 6 and 15 MV photon beams. The linearity and stability of the detector's response and dose rate were measured. Square-field sizes ranging from 0.6×0.6 - 5×5 cm2 were used for obtaining percentage depth dose curves (PDDs) and in-plane profiles. The angular and temperature dependence of both detectors' responses were also studied. RESULTS The detector response shows good stability, no deviation from linearity, and low dose rate dependence (≤1.6%). PDDs and in-plan profiles of both detectors are in good agreement and no significant difference was observed except for the high dose gradient regions (P-value≤0.017). Both detectors demonstrated low angular dependence (<0.3%) with temperature dependence lower than 1% for both detectors. CONCLUSION The results indicate both investigated detectors were well performed in small field relative dosimetry and for measuring penumbra, it is better to use microdiamond detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Momeni Harzanji
- MSc, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hassan Larizadeh
- MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Nasim Namiranian
- MD, Yazd Diabetes Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Abolfazl Nickfarjam
- PhD, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Performance of 3D diamond detectors in small field dosimetry: The impact of pixel size. Phys Med 2022; 102:73-78. [PMID: 36126470 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Small photon beams used in radiotherapy techniques have inherent characteristics of charge particle disequilibrium and high-dose gradient making accurate dosimetry for such fields very challenging. By means of a 3D manufacturing technique, it is possible to create arrays of pixels with a very small sensitive volume for radiotherapy dosimetry. We investigate the impact of 3D pixels size on absorbed dose sensitivity, linearity of response with dose rate, reproducibility and beam profile measurements. METHODS Diamond detectors with different pixel sizes have been produced in the 3DOSE experiment framework. To investigate the pixels size impact, they were tested using an Elekta Synergy LINAC. Dose rate dependence, absorbed dose sensitivity, reproducibility and beam profile measurement accuracy have been investigated and compared with PTW 60019 and IBA SFD reference dosimeters. RESULTS All of the 3D pixels had a linear and reproducible response to the dose rate. The sensitivity of a pixel decreases with its size, although even the smallest pixel has a high absorbed dose sensitivity (15 nC/Gy). The penumbra width measured with the smallest pixel size was consistent with the PTW microDiamond and differed by 0.2 mm from the IBA SFD diode. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates that variation in pixel size do not affect the linearity of response with dose rate and the reproducibility of response. Due to the 3D geometry, the absorbed dose sensitivity of the detector remains high even for the smallest pixel, furthermore the pixel size was demonstrated to be of fundamental importance in the measurement of beam profiles.
Collapse
|
30
|
Geurts MW, Jacqmin DJ, Jones LE, Kry SF, Mihailidis DN, Ohrt JD, Ritter T, Smilowitz JB, Wingreen NE. AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13641. [PMID: 35950259 PMCID: PMC9512346 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines:
Must and Must Not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. While must is the term to be used in the guidelines, if an entity that adopts the guideline has shall as the preferred term, the AAPM considers that must and shall have the same meaning. Should and Should Not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhao W, Yang Y, Xing L, Chuang CF, Schüler E. Mitigating the uncertainty in small field dosimetry by leveraging machine learning strategies. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7fd6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Small field dosimetry is significantly different from the dosimetry of broad beams due to loss of electron side scatter equilibrium, source occlusion, and effects related to the choice of detector. However, use of small fields is increasing with the increase in indications for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy, and thus the need for accurate dosimetry is ever more important. Here we propose to leverage machine learning (ML) strategies to reduce the uncertainties and increase the accuracy in determining small field output factors (OFs). Linac OFs from a Varian TrueBeam STx were calculated either by the treatment planning system (TPS) or measured with a W1 scintillator detector at various multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positions, jaw positions, and with and without contribution from leaf-end transmission. The fields were defined by the MLCs with the jaws at various positions. Field sizes between 5 and 100 mm were evaluated. Separate ML regression models were generated based on the TPS calculated or the measured datasets. Accurate predictions of small field OFs at different field sizes (FSs) were achieved independent of jaw and MLC position. A mean and maximum % relative error of 0.38 ± 0.39% and 3.62%, respectively, for the best-performing models based on the measured datasets were found. The prediction accuracy was independent of contribution from leaf-end transmission. Several ML models for predicting small field OFs were generated, validated, and tested. Incorporating these models into the dose calculation workflow could greatly increase the accuracy and robustness of dose calculations for any radiotherapy delivery technique that relies heavily on small fields.
Collapse
|
32
|
Jacqmin DJ, Miller JR, Barraclough BA, Labby ZE. Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13728. [PMID: 35861648 PMCID: PMC9359019 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery. Methods Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector. Results W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements. Conclusion The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin J Jacqmin
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jessica R Miller
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Brendan A Barraclough
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zacariah E Labby
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gondré M, Conrad M, Vallet V, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13732. [PMID: 35856911 PMCID: PMC9359029 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background RaySearch (AB, Stockholm) has released a module for CyberKnife (CK) planning within its RayStation (RS) treatment planning system (TPS). Purpose To create and validate beam models of fixed, Iris, and multileaf collimators (MLC) of the CK M6 for Monte Carlo (MC) and collapsed cone (CC) algorithms in the RS TPS. Methods Measurements needed for the creation of the beam models were performed in a water tank with a stereotactic PTW 60018 diode. Both CC and MC models were optimized in RS by minimizing the differences between the measured and computed profiles and percentage depth doses. The models were then validated by comparing dose from the plans created in RS with both single and multiple beams in different phantom conditions with the corresponding measured dose. Irregular field shapes and off‐axis beams were also tested for the MLC. Validation measurements were performed using an A1SL ionization chamber, EBT3 Gafchromic films, and a PTW 1000 SRS detector. Finally, patient‐specific QAs with gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm were performed for each model. Results The models were created in a straightforward manner with efficient tools available in RS. The differences between computed and measured doses were within ±1% for most of the configurations tested and reached a maximum of 3.2% for measurements at a depth of 19.5‐cm. With respect to all collimators and algorithms, the maximum averaged dose difference was 0.8% when considering absolute dose measurements on the central axis. The patient‐specific QAs led to a mean result of 98% of points fulfilling gamma criteria. Conclusions We created both CC and MC models for fixed, Iris, and MLC collimators in RS. The dose differences for all collimators and algorithms were within ±1%, except for depths larger than 9 cm. This allowed us to validate both models for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maude Gondré
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mireille Conrad
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Véronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radio-Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Resch AF, Padilla Cabal F, Regodic M, Lechner W, Heilemann G, Kuess P, Georg D, Palmans H. Accelerating and improving radiochromic film calibration by utilizing the dose ratio in photon and proton beams. Med Phys 2022; 49:6150-6160. [PMID: 35754376 PMCID: PMC9543697 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiochromic films are versatile 2D dosimeters with high‐resolution and near tissue equivalence. To assure high precision and accuracy, a time‐consuming calibration process is required. To improve the time efficiency, a novel calibration method utilizing the ratio of the same dose profile measured at different monitor units (MUs) is introduced and tested in a proton and photon beam. Methods The calibration procedure employs the dose ratio of film measurements of the same relative profile for different absolute dose values. Hence, the ratio of the dose is constant at any point of the profile, but the ratio of the net optical densities is not constant. The key idea of the method is to optimize the calibration function until the ratio of the calculated doses is constant. The proposed method was tested in the dose range between 0.25–12 and 1–6 Gy in a proton and photon beam, respectively. A radial symmetric profile and a rectangular profile were created, both having a central plateau region of about 3 cm diameter and a dose falloff of about 1.5 cm at larger distances. The dose falloff region was used as input for the optimization method and the central plateau region served as dose reference points. Only the plateau region of the highest dose entered the optimization as an additional objective. The measured data were randomly split into differently sized training and test sets. The optimization was repeated 1000 times with random start value initialization using the same start values for the standard and the gradient method. Finally, a proton plan with four dose levels was created, which were separated spatially, to test the possibility of a full calibration within a single measurement. Results Parameter estimation was possible with as low as one dose ratio used for optimization in both the photon and the proton case, yet exhibiting a high sensitivity on the dose level. The root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of the dose was less than 1% when the dose ratio was in the order of 20, whereas the median RMSD of all optimizations was 1.7%. Using four dose levels for optimization resulted in a median RMSD of 1% when randomly selecting the dose levels. Having at least one dose ratio of about 20 included in the optimization considerably improved the RMSD of the calibration function. Using six or eight dose levels reduced the sensitivity on the dose level selection and the median RMSD was 0.8%. A full calibration was possible in a single measurement having four dose levels in one plan but spatially separated. Conclusions The number of measurements required to obtain an EBT3 film calibration function could be reduced using the proposed dose ratio method while maintaining the same accuracy as with the standard method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas F. Resch
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Fatima Padilla Cabal
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Milovan Regodic
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Wolfgang Lechner
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Gerd Heilemann
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Peter Kuess
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division Medical Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyMedical University of Vienna/AKH WienViennaAustria
| | - Hugo Palmans
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CentreWiener NeustadtAustria
- Medical Radiation ScienceNational Physical LaboratoryTeddingtonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lechner W, Alfonso R, Arib M, Huq MS, Ismail A, Kinhikar R, Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM, Mani KR, Maphumulo N, Sauer OA, Shoeir S, Suriyapee S, Christaki K. A multi-institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS-483. Med Phys 2022; 49:5537-5550. [PMID: 35717637 PMCID: PMC9541513 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). Materials and methods Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. Results The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. Conclusion Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lechner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Rodolfo Alfonso
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Higher Institute of Technology and Applied Sciences, University of Havana, Havana, 10400, Cuba
| | - Mehenna Arib
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anas Ismail
- Protection and Safety Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus, PO Box 6091, Syria
| | - Rajesh Kinhikar
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India 400012 & Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400094, India
| | - José M Lárraga-Gutiérrez
- Laboratorio de Física-Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CDMX, México
| | - Karthick Raj Mani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, United Hospital Ltd., Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
- Radiation Dosimetry Section, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Sivalee Suriyapee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van der Heyden B, Heymans SV, Carlier B, Collado-Lara G, Sterpin E, D’hooge J. Deep learning for dose assessment in radiotherapy by the super-localization of vaporized nanodroplets in high frame rate ultrasound imaging. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac6cc3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. External beam radiotherapy is aimed to precisely deliver a high radiation dose to malignancies, while optimally sparing surrounding healthy tissues. With the advent of increasingly complex treatment plans, the delivery should preferably be verified by quality assurance methods. Recently, online ultrasound imaging of vaporized radiosensitive nanodroplets was proposed as a promising tool for in vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy. Previously, the detection of sparse vaporization events was achieved by applying differential ultrasound (US) imaging followed by intensity thresholding using subjective parameter tuning, which is sensitive to image artifacts. Approach. A generalized deep learning solution (i.e. BubbleNet) is proposed to localize vaporized nanodroplets on differential US frames, while overcoming the aforementioned limitation. A 5-fold cross-validation was performed on a diversely composed 5747-frame training/validation dataset by manual segmentation. BubbleNet was then applied on a test dataset of 1536 differential US frames to evaluate dosimetric features. The intra-observer variability was determined by scoring the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) on 150 frames segmented twice. Additionally, the BubbleNet generalization capability was tested on an external test dataset of 432 frames acquired by a phased array transducer at a much lower ultrasound frequency and reconstructed with unconventional pixel dimensions with respect to the training dataset. Main results. The median DSC in the 5-fold cross validation was equal to ∼0.88, which was in line with the intra-observer variability (=0.86). Next, BubbleNet was employed to detect vaporizations in differential US frames obtained during the irradiation of phantoms with a 154 MeV proton beam or a 6 MV photon beam. BubbleNet improved the bubble-count statistics by ∼30% compared to the earlier established intensity-weighted thresholding. The proton range was verified with a −0.8 mm accuracy. Significance. BubbleNet is a flexible tool to localize individual vaporized nanodroplets on experimentally acquired US images, which improves the sensitivity compared to former thresholding-weighted methods.
Collapse
|
37
|
Investigation of the effects of the step size of Geant4 electromagnetic physics on the depth dose simulation of a small field proton beam. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
38
|
Simiele E, Capaldi D, Breitkreutz D, Han B, Yeung T, White J, Zaks D, Owens M, Maganti S, Xing L, Surucu M, Kovalchuk N. Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13638. [PMID: 35644039 PMCID: PMC9359035 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Simiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| | - Dante Capaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| | - Dylan Breitkreutz
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| | - Bin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| | | | - John White
- RefleXion Medical, Inc. Hayward California USA
| | - Daniel Zaks
- RefleXion Medical, Inc. Hayward California USA
| | | | | | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| | - Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford California USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Azadeh P, Amiri S, Mostaar A, Yaghobi Joybari A, Paydar R. Evaluation of MAGIC-f polymer gel dosimeter for dose profile measurement in small fields and stereotactic irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.109991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Han B, Capaldi D, Kovalchuk N, Simiele E, White J, Zaks D, Xing L, Surucu M. Beam commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13607. [PMID: 35482018 PMCID: PMC9194984 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This study reports the beam commissioning results for the first clinical RefleXion Linac. Methods: The X1 produces a 6 MV photon beam and the maximum clinical field size is 40 × 2 cm2 at source‐to‐axis distance of 85 cm. Treatment fields are collimated by a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) system with 64 leaves with width of 0.625 cm and y‐jaw pairs to provide either a 1 or 2 cm opening. The mechanical alignment of the radiation source, the y‐jaw, and MLC were checked with film and ion chambers. The beam parameters were characterized using a diode detector in a compact water tank. In‐air lateral profiles and in‐water percentage depth dose (PDD) were measured for beam modeling of the treatment planning system (TPS). The lateral profiles, PDDs, and output factors were acquired for field sizes from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm2 field to verify the beam modeling. The rotational output variation and synchronicity were tested to check the gantry angle, couch motion, and gantry rotation. Results: The source misalignments were 0.049 mm in y‐direction, 0.66% out‐of‐focus in x‐direction. The divergence of the beam axis was 0.36 mm with a y‐jaw twist of 0.03°. Clinical off‐axis treatment fields shared a common center in y‐direction were within 0.03 mm. The MLC misalignment and twist were 0.57 mm and 0.15°. For all measured fields ranging from the size from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm2, the mean difference between measured and TPS modeled PDD at 10 cm depth was −0.3%. The mean transverse profile difference in the field core was −0.3% ± 1.1%. The full‐width half maximum (FWHM) modeling was within 0.5 mm. The measured output factors agreed with TPS within 0.8%. Conclusions: This study summarizes our specific experience commissioning the first novel RefleXion linac, which may assist future users of this technology when implementing it into their own clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dante Capaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Eric Simiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - John White
- RefleXion Medical, Hayward, California, USA
| | | | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dose area product primary standards established by graphite calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB for small radiation fields in radiotherapy. Phys Med 2022; 98:18-27. [PMID: 35489128 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present primary standards establishment in terms of Dose Area Product (DAP) for small field sizes. METHODS A large section graphite calorimeter and two plane-parallel ionization chambers were designed and built in-house. These chambers were calibrated in a 6MV FFF beam at the maximum dose rate of 1400 UM/min for fields defined by specifically designed circular collimators of 5, 7.5, 10, 13 and 15 mm diameter and jaws of 5, 7, 10, 13 and 15 mm side length on a Varian TrueBeam linac. RESULTS The two chambers show the same behaviour regardless of field shape and size. From 5 to 15 mm, calibration coefficients slightly increase with the field size with a magnitude of 1.8% and 1.1% respectively for the two chambers, and are independent of the field shape. This tendency was confirmed by Monte Carlo calculations. The average associated uncertainty of the calibration coefficients is around 0.6% at k=1. CONCLUSIONS For the first time, primary standards in terms of DAP were established by graphite calorimetry for an extended range of small field sizes. These promising results open the door for an alternative approach in small fields dosimetry.
Collapse
|
42
|
Mehrens H, Nguyen T, Edward S, Hartzell S, Glenn M, Branco D, Hernandez N, Alvarez P, Molineu A, Taylor P, Kry S. The current status and shortcomings of stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac058. [PMID: 35664554 PMCID: PMC9154323 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment for intracranial lesions. This work explores the state of SRS treatment delivery to characterize current treatment accuracy based on treatment parameters. Methods NCI clinical trials involving SRS rely on an end-to-end treatment delivery on a patient surrogate (credentialing phantom) from the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) to test their treatment accuracy. The results of 1072 SRS phantom irradiations between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis and random forest models were used to associate irradiation conditions with phantom performance. The following categories were evaluated in terms of how they predicted outcomes: year of irradiation, TPS algorithm, machine model, energy, and delivered field size. Results Overall, only 84.6% of irradiations have met the IROC/NCI acceptability criteria. Pass rate has remained constant over time, while dose calculation accuracy has slightly improved. Dose calculation algorithm (P < .001), collimator (P = .024), and field size (P < .001) were statistically significant predictors of pass/fail. Specifically, pencil beam algorithms and cone collimators were more likely to be associated with failing phantom results. Random forest modeling identified the size of the field as the most important factor for passing or failing followed by algorithm. Conclusion Constant throughout this retrospective study, approximately 15% of institutions fail to meet IROC/NCI standards for SRS treatment. In current clinical practice, this is particularly associated with smaller fields that yielded less accurate results. There is ongoing need to improve small field dosimetry, beam modeling, and QA to ensure high treatment quality, patient safety, and optimal clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Mehrens
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Trang Nguyen
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Sharbacha Edward
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Shannon Hartzell
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Mallory Glenn
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Daniela Branco
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Nadia Hernandez
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Paola Alvarez
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Andrea Molineu
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Paige Taylor
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Stephen Kry
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Quantitative evaluation of dosimetric uncertainties associated with small electron fields. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:273-282. [PMID: 35304080 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although many studies have investigated small electron fields, there are several dosimetric issues that are not well understood. This includes lack of charged particle equilibrium, lateral scatter, source occlusion and volume averaging of the detectors used in the measurement of the commissioning data. High energy electron beams are also associated with bremsstrahlung production that contributes to dose deposition, which is not well investigated, particularly for small electron fields. The goal of this work has been to investigate dosimetric uncertainties associated with small electron fields using dose measurements with different detectors as well as calculations with eMC dose calculation algorithm. METHODS Different dosimetric parameters including output factors, depth dose curves and dose profiles from small electron field cutouts were investigated quantitatively. These dosimetric parameters were measured using different detectors that included small ion chambers and diodes for small electron cutouts with diameters ranging from 15-50mm mounted on a 6 × 6cm2 cone with beam energies from 6-20MeV. RESULTS Large deviations existed between the output factors calculated with the eMC algorithm and measured with small detectors for small electron fields up to 55% for 6MeV. The discrepancy between the calculated and measured doses increased 10%-55% with decreasing electron beam energy from 20 MeV to 6 MeV for 15mm circular field. For electron fields with cutouts 20mm and larger, the measured and calculated doses agreed within 5% for all electron energies from 6-20MeV. For small electron fields, the maximal depth dose shifted upstream and becomes more superficial as the electron beam energy increases from 6-20MeV as measured with small detectors. DISCUSSION Large dose discrepancies were found between the measured and calculated doses for small electron fields where the eMC underestimated output factors by 55% for small circular electron fields with a diameter of 15 mm, particularly for low energy electron beams. The measured entrance doses and dmax of the depth dose curves did not agree with the corresponding values calculated by eMC. Furthermore, the measured dose profiles showed enhanced dose deposition in the umbra region and outside the small fields, which mostly resulted from dose deposition from the bremsstrahlung produced by high energy electrons that was not accounted for by the eMC algorithm due to inaccurate modeling of the lateral dose deposition from bremsstrahlung. CONCLUSION Electron small field dosimetry require more consideration of variations in beam quality, lack of charged particle equilibrium, lateral scatter loss and dose deposition from bremsstrahlung produced by energetic electron beams in a comprehensive approach similar to photon small field dosimetry. Furthermore, most of the commercially available electron dose calculation algorithms are commissioned with large electron fields; therefore, vendors should provide tools for the modeling of electron dose calculation algorithms for small electron fields.
Collapse
|
44
|
Brown TAD, Fagerstrom JM, Beck C, Holloway C, Burton K, Kaurin DGL, Mahendra S, Luckstead M, Kielar K, Kerns J. Determination of commissioning criteria for multileaf-collimator, stereotactic radiosurgery treatments on Varian TrueBeam and Edge machines using a novel anthropomorphic phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13581. [PMID: 35290710 PMCID: PMC9195028 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
An anthropomorphic phantom has been developed by Varian Medical Systems for commissioning multileaf‐collimator (MLC), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments on Varian TrueBeam and Edge linear accelerators. Northwest Medical Physics Center (NMPC) has collected end‐to‐end data on these machines, at six independent clinical sites, to establish baseline dosimetric and geometric commissioning criteria for SRS measurements with this phantom. The Varian phantom is designed to accommodate four interchangeable target cassettes, each designed for a specific quality assurance function. End‐to‐end measurements utilized the phantom to verify the coincidence of treatment isocenter with a hidden target in a Winston‐Lutz cassette after localization using cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT). Dose delivery to single target (2 cm) and single‐isocenter, multitarget (2 and 1 cm) geometries was verified using ionization chamber and EBT3 film cassettes. A nominal dose of 16 Gy was prescribed for each plan using a site's standard beam geometry for SRS cases. Measurements were performed with three Millennium and three high‐definition MLC machines at beam energies of 6‐MV and 10‐MV flattening‐filter‐free energies. Each clinical site followed a standardized procedure for phantom simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery. All treatment planning and delivery was performed using ARIA oncology information system and Eclipse treatment planning software. The isocenter measurements and irradiated film were analyzed using DoseLab quality assurance software; gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm, 3%/0.5 mm, and 2%/1 mm were applied for film analysis. Based on the data acquired in this work, the recommended commissioning criteria for end‐to‐end SRS measurements with the Varian phantom are as follows: coincidence of treatment isocenter and CBCT‐aligned hidden target < 1 mm, agreement of measured chamber dose with calculated dose ≤ 5%, and film gamma passing > 90% for gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm after DoseLab auto‐registration shifts ≤ 1 mm in any direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Caleb Beck
- Northwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA
| | | | - Krista Burton
- Northwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kayla Kielar
- Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - James Kerns
- Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Khan AU, Lotey R, DeWerd LA, Yadav P. A multi-institutional comparison of dosimetric data for a 0.35 T MR-linac. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac53df] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. A comparison of percent depth dose (PDD) curves, lateral beam profiles, output factors (OFs), multileaf collimator (MLC) leakage, and couch transmission factors was performed between ten institutes for a commercial 0.35 T MR-linac. Approach. The measured data was collected during acceptance testing of the MR-linac. The PDD curves were measured for the 3.32 × 3.32 cm2, 9.96 × 9.96 cm2, and 27.20 × 24.07 cm2 field sizes. The lateral beam profiles were acquired for a 27.20 × 24.07 cm2 field size using an ion chamber array and penumbra was defined as the distance between 80% of the maximum dose and 20% of the maximum dose after normalizing the profiles to the dose at the inflection points. The OFs were measured using solid-state dosimeters, whereas radiochromic films were utilized to measure radiation leakage through the MLC stacks. The relative couch transmission factors were measured for various gantry angles. The variation in the multi-institutional data was quantified using the percent standard deviation metric. Main results. Minimal variations (<1%) were found between the PDD data, except for the build-up region and the deeper regions of the PDD curve. The in-field region of the lateral beam profiles varied <1.5% between different institutions and a small variation (<0.7 mm) in penumbra was observed. A variation of <1% was observed in the OF data for field sizes above 1.66 × 1.66 cm2, whereas large variations were shown for small-field sizes. The average and maximum MLC leakage was calculated to be <0.3% and <0.6%, which was well below the international electrotechnical commission (IEC) leakage thresholds. The couch transmission was smallest for oblique beams and ranged from 0.83 to 0.87. Significance. The variation in the data was found to be relatively small and the different 0.35 T MR-linacs were concluded to have similar dosimetric characteristics.
Collapse
|
46
|
Das IJ, Dawes SL, Dominello MM, Kavanagh B, Miyamoto CT, Pawlicki T, Santanam L, Vinogradskiy Y, Yeung AR. Quality and Safety Considerations in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO Safety White Paper Update. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e253-e268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
47
|
Sun W, Shi Y, Li Y, Ge C, Yang X, Xia W, Chen K, Wang L, Dong L, Wang H. Selection Strategy of Jaw Tracking in VMAT Planning for Lung SBRT. Front Oncol 2022; 12:820632. [PMID: 35211411 PMCID: PMC8860988 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.820632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the dosimetric effect and delivery reliability of jaw tracking (JT) with increasing planning target volume (PTV) for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans. A threshold of PTV was proposed as a selection criterion between JT and fixed-jaw (FJ) techniques. Methods A total of 28 patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer were retrospectively included. The PTVs ranged from 4.88 cc to 68.74 cc, prescribed with 48 Gy in four fractions. Three-partial-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with FJ and with JT were created for each patient with the same optimization objectives. These two sets of plans were compared using metrics, including conformity index (CI), V50%, R50%, D2cm, dose–volume parameters of organs at risk, and monitor units (MUs). The ratio of small subfields (<3 cm in either dimension), %SS, was acquired as a surrogate for the small-field uncertainty. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the differences in these parameters and the PTV. Results The V50%, R50%, D2cm, and V20Gy, D1,500cc, and D1,000cc of the lung showed a statistically significant improvement in JT plans as opposed to FJ plans, while the number of MU in JT plans was higher by an average of 1.9%. Between FJ and JT plans, the PTV was strongly correlated with the differences in V50%, moderately correlated with those in V20Gy of the lung, and weakly correlated with those in D2cm and D1,500cc of the lung. By using JT, %SS was found to be negatively correlated with the PTV, and the PTV should be at least approximately 12.5 cc for an expected %SS <50%, which was 15 cc for a %SS <20% and 20 cc for a %SS <5%. Conclusions Considering the dosimetric differences and small-field uncertainties, JT could be selected using a PTV threshold, such as 12.5, 15, or 20 cc, on the basis of the demand of delivery reliability for lung SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wuji Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yinghua Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yu Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Chao Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xu Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wenming Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Kunzhi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Libo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lihua Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.,National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Huidong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Campos GFP, Souto ACS, Lencart JB, Cunha LPT, Dias AG. Development of an independent MU calculation software for radiotherapy treatments with stereotactic cones. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13542. [PMID: 35166027 PMCID: PMC8992931 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Development of an independent MU calculator (StereoCalc) with and without heterogeneity corrections for stereotactic treatments, in a Varian TrueBeam STx LINAC using stereotactic cones, with flattening filter‐free photon energies. Methods Multiple depth curves and output factors were measured, following the dosimetry formalism for small fields proposed by the TRS‐483. The developed StereoCalc imports and processes the beam data files and calculates the patient plans with and without heterogeneity correction. Validation of the developed software was carried out using phantoms. The accuracy of the StereoCalc software was verified in stereotactic patient plans. Results A maximum difference of 2.47% and 2.07% was obtained in the phantom validation tests with and without heterogeneity correction, respectively. The mean percentual difference of StereoCalc from cone dose calculation (CDC) in the clinical testing was 2.86% ±1.27% and 0.78% ±0.48% with and without heterogeneity correction, respectively. The largest differences found were 7.34% and 1.98%, respectively. Conclusions The results obtained in this work show that the MU calculated with StereoCalc software is in good agreement with the values calculated by the treatment planning systems, both in static fields and arcs. We have also improved the software to consider heterogeneity corrections calculations. As expected, and as a major achievement of this work, some differences were observed when heterogeneities were considered. StereoCalc proved to be a powerful tool that can be integrated into the specific quality assurance program in a medical physics department for independent verification in stereotactic treatment with cones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Catarina Santos Souto
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Joana Borges Lencart
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Paulo Teixeira Cunha
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Anabela Gregório Dias
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Li Y, Liu H, Huang N, Wang Z, Zhang C. The Measurement of the Surface Dose in Regular and Small Radiation Therapy Fields Using Cherenkov Imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338211073432. [PMID: 35119327 PMCID: PMC8819764 DOI: 10.1177/15330338211073432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to measure the output factor (OF)
and profile of surface dose in regular and small radiation therapy fields using
Cherenkov imaging (CI). Methods: A medical linear accelerator
(linac) was employed to generate radiation fields, including regular open photon
field (ROPF), regular wedge photon field (RWPF), regular electron field (REF)
and small photon field (SPF). The photon beams consisted of two filter modes
including flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF). All fields
were delivered to a solid water phantom. Cherenkov light was captured using a
charge-coupled device system during phantom irradiation. The OF and profile of
surface dose measured by CI were compared with those determined by film
measurement, ionization chamber measurement and treatment planning system
calculation in order to examine the feasibility of measuring surface dose OF and
profile using CI. Results: The discrepancy between surface dose OF
measured by CI and that determined by other methods is less than 6% in ROPFs
with size less than 10 × 10 cm2, REFs with size less than 10 × 10
cm2, and SPFs except for 1 × 1 cm2 field. In the flat
profile region, the discrepancy between surface dose profile measured by CI and
that determined by other methods is less than 4% in REFs and less than 3% in
ROPFs, RWPFs, and SPFs except for 1 × 1 cm2 field. The discrepancy of the
surface dose profile is in compliance with the recommendation by IAEA TRS 430
reports. The discrepancy between field width measured by CI and that determined
by film measurement is equal to or less than 2 mm, which is within the tolerance
recommend by the guidelines of linac quality assurance in regular open FF photon
fields, SPFs, and REFs with cone size of 10 × 10 cm2 in area.
Conclusion: CI can be used to quantitatively measure the OF and
profile of surface dose. It is feasible to use CI to measure the surface dose
profile and field width in regular open FF photon fields and SPFs except for
1 × 1 cm2 field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an
Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an
710119, China
- School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,
China
| | - HongJun Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an
Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an
710119, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi
University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- Hongjun Liu, PhD, State Key Laboratory of
Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision
Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China.
Chunmin Zhang, PhD, School of Physics,
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China.
| | - Nan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an
Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an
710119, China
| | - Zhaolu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an
Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an
710119, China
| | - Chunmin Zhang
- School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
- Hongjun Liu, PhD, State Key Laboratory of
Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision
Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China.
Chunmin Zhang, PhD, School of Physics,
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Savanović M, Allali S, Jaroš D, Foulquier JN. Does irregular breathing impact on respiratory gated radiation therapy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments? Med Dosim 2022; 47:151-157. [PMID: 35093268 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The impact of irregular breathing on respiratory gated radiation therapy (RGRT) was evaluated for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments. Measurements in the static mode were performed with different field sizes, depths of the measurements, breathing periods and duty cycles, using the Farmer ion chamber, PinPoint ion chamber, and microDiamond detector. The output constancy (OC) was evaluated between gated and nongated beams. Measurements in the dynamic mode for regular and irregular breathing in phase- and amplitude-gated modes, were performed with the amplitude of target motion from 5 mm to 25 mm, and breathing period from 3 to 6 s, for ion chamber, and film inserts. The dose discrepancy was evaluated for the ion chamber insert. The gamma passing rate was evaluated with film dosimetry. In the static mode, the maximum obtained OC was 0.8% using the Farmer ion chamber, 1% (p < 0.001) using the microDiamond detector, and 1.4% (p < 0.001) using the PinPoint ion chamber. In the dynamic mode, good agreement between planned and measured doses was obtained for regular breathing, 2.08 ± 0.48% (1.57 to 2.74%), which increased to 3.42 ± 1.24% (1.58 to 6.69%) for irregular breathing. The gamma passing rate of 3mm/3%, 3mm/2%, 3mm/1% and 2mm/2% was 99.4% ± 0.3, 98.2 ± 0.8%, 88.2 ± 3.0% and 96.4 ± 1.0% for regular and 97.2% ± 1.6%, 95.1 ± 2.6%, 85.6 ± 3.0% and 92.9 ± 2.9% for irregular breathing patterns (p < 0.01), respectively. For a slightly irregular breathing amplitude, lung SBRT cancer patients can be treated in the phase-gated mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milovan Savanović
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94276, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75020, France.
| | - Sophiane Allali
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Dražan Jaroš
- Affidea, International Medical Centers, Center for Radiotherapy, Banja Luka, 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Jean-Noël Foulquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75020, France
| |
Collapse
|