Evaluation of repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the fan-beam KV-CT on a novel ring gantry-based PET/CT linear accelerator

BACKGROUND

The RefleXion^® X1 is a novel radiotherapy delivery system on a ring gantry equipped with fan-beam kV-CT and PET imaging subsystems. The day-to-day scanning variability of radiomics features must be evaluated before any attempt to utilize radiomics features PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the RefleXion^® X1 kV-CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Credence Cartridge Radiomics (CCR) phantom includes six cartridges of varied materials. It was scanned ten times on the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem over a three-month period using the two most frequently used scanning protocols (BMS and BMF). Fifty-five radiomic features were extracted for each ROI on each CT scan and analyzed using LifeX software. The coefficient of variation (COV) was computed to evaluate the repeatability. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the scanned images using 0.9 as the threshold. This process is repeated on a GE PET-CT scanner using several built-in protocols as a comparison.

RESULTS

On average, 87% of the features on both scan protocols on the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem can be considered repeatable as they met COV < 10% criteria. On GE PET-CT, this number is similar at 86%. When we tighten the criteria to COV<5%, the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem showed much better repeatability with 81% of features on average whereas GE PET-CT showed only 73.5% on average. About 91% and 89% of the features with ICC>0.9 respectively for BMS and BMF protocols on RefleXion X1. On the other hand, the percentage of features with ICC>0.9 on GE PET-CT ranges from 67% to 82%. The RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem showed excellent intra-scanner reproducibility between the scanning protocols much better than the GE PET CT scanner. For the inter-scanner reproducibility, the percentage of features with CCC>0.9 ranged from 49% to 80%. between X1 and GE PET-CT scanning protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically useful CT radiomic features produced by the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem are reproducible and stable over time, demonstrating its utility as a quantitative imaging platform. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Beam commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy system

This study reports the beam commissioning results for the first clinical RefleXion Linac.

Methods: The X1 produces a 6 MV photon beam and the maximum clinical field size is 40 × 2 cm² at source‐to‐axis distance of 85 cm. Treatment fields are collimated by a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) system with 64 leaves with width of 0.625 cm and y‐jaw pairs to provide either a 1 or 2 cm opening. The mechanical alignment of the radiation source, the y‐jaw, and MLC were checked with film and ion chambers. The beam parameters were characterized using a diode detector in a compact water tank. In‐air lateral profiles and in‐water percentage depth dose (PDD) were measured for beam modeling of the treatment planning system (TPS). The lateral profiles, PDDs, and output factors were acquired for field sizes from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm² field to verify the beam modeling. The rotational output variation and synchronicity were tested to check the gantry angle, couch motion, and gantry rotation.

Results: The source misalignments were 0.049 mm in y‐direction, 0.66% out‐of‐focus in x‐direction. The divergence of the beam axis was 0.36 mm with a y‐jaw twist of 0.03°. Clinical off‐axis treatment fields shared a common center in y‐direction were within 0.03 mm. The MLC misalignment and twist were 0.57 mm and 0.15°. For all measured fields ranging from the size from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm², the mean difference between measured and TPS modeled PDD at 10 cm depth was −0.3%. The mean transverse profile difference in the field core was −0.3% ± 1.1%. The full‐width half maximum (FWHM) modeling was within 0.5 mm. The measured output factors agreed with TPS within 0.8%.

Conclusions: This study summarizes our specific experience commissioning the first novel RefleXion linac, which may assist future users of this technology when implementing it into their own clinics.