Accurate intravoxel incoherent motion parameter estimation using Bayesian fitting and reduced number of low b-values

Task-driven assessment of experimental designs in diffusion MRI: A computational framework

This paper proposes a task-driven computational framework for assessing diffusion MRI experimental designs which, rather than relying on parameter-estimation metrics, directly measures quantitative task performance. Traditional computational experimental design (CED) methods may be ill-suited to experimental tasks, such as clinical classification, where outcome does not depend on parameter-estimation accuracy or precision alone. Current assessment metrics evaluate experiments’ ability to faithfully recover microstructural parameters rather than their task performance. The method we propose addresses this shortcoming. For a given MRI experimental design (protocol, parameter-estimation method, model, etc.), experiments are simulated start-to-finish and task performance is computed from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and associated summary metrics (e.g. area under the curve (AUC)). Two experiments were performed: first, a validation of the pipeline’s task performance predictions against clinical results, comparing in-silico predictions to real-world ROC/AUC; and second, a demonstration of the pipeline’s advantages over traditional CED approaches, using two simulated clinical classification tasks. Comparison with clinical datasets validates our method’s predictions of (a) the qualitative form of ROC curves, (b) the relative task performance of different experimental designs, and (c) the absolute performance (AUC) of each experimental design. Furthermore, we show that our method outperforms traditional task-agnostic assessment methods, enabling improved, more useful experimental design. Our pipeline produces accurate, quantitative predictions of real-world task performance. Compared to current approaches, such task-driven assessment is more likely to identify experimental designs that perform well in practice. Our method is not limited to diffusion MRI; the pipeline generalises to any task-based quantitative MRI application, and provides the foundation for developing future task-driven end-to end CED frameworks.

A Multi-Variate framework to assess reliability and discrimination power of Bayesian estimation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion parameters

PURPOSE

To propose a multivariate multi-step framework for a systematic assessment of the estimation reliability and discriminability of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) model parameters.

METHODS

Monte-Carlo simulations were generated on a range of SNRs and in different IVIM combinations considering: i) a dense discretization with 24 b-values; ii) a discretization with 9 b-values. A state-of-the-art Bayesian fitting method was adopted. The framework assessed: i) the best model between mono- and bi-exponential, through the BIC index; ii) the fitting accuracy; iii) the power in discriminating two different IVIM parameters distributions of estimated coefficients, using a multivariate test. Exemplificative oncologic cases were also presented.

RESULTS

The bi-exponential fitting was reliable for perfusion fraction higher than 5%, with high accuracy in D estimation, acceptable error for f, but high uncertainty in D*. The discrimination of two distributions is generally feasible if differences in D values (at least 0.3 x10^-3 mm²/s) are present; in the case of similar D values, a minimal difference of 5% in f can be discriminated just in case of balanced sample size and dense b-values discretization, whereas the impact of D* is quite negligible. These results were also supported by clinical examples.

CONCLUSIONS

IVIM model is generally accurate in estimating diffusion, but uncertainties related to perfusion estimation are not negligible and compromise the discrimination power when different populations should be differentiated. The proposed framework should be adopted as interpretative guidelines to better understand when IVIM model applied on real data can provide reliable findings.

Short-Term Repeatability of in Vivo Cardiac Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Tensor Imaging in Healthy Human Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) tensor imaging is a promising technique for diagnosis and monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. Knowledge about measurement repeatability, however, remains limited.

PURPOSE

To evaluate short-term repeatability of IVIM tensor imaging in normal in vivo human hearts.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Ten healthy subjects without history of heart diseases.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Balanced steady-state free-precession cine sequence and single-shot spin-echo echo planar IVIM tensor imaging sequence (9 b-values, 0-400 seconds/mm² and six diffusion-encoding directions) at 3.0 T.

ASSESSMENT

Subjects were scanned twice with an interval of 15 minutes, leaving the scanner between studies. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was evaluated in anterior, lateral, septal, and inferior segments of the left ventricle wall. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), mean fraction (MF), and helix angle (HA) in the four segments were independently measured by five radiologists.

STATISTICAL TESTS

IVIM tensor indexes were compared between observers using a one-way analysis of variance or between scans using a paired t-test (normal data) or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test (non-normal data). Interobserver agreement and test-retest repeatability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV), and Bland-Altman limits of agreements.

RESULTS

SNR of inferior segment was significantly lower than the other three segments, and inferior segment was therefore excluded from repeatability analysis. Interobserver repeatability was excellent for all IVIM tensor indexes (ICC: 0.886-0.972; WCV: 0.62%-4.22%). Test-retest repeatability was excellent for MD of the self-diffusion tensor (D) and MF of the perfusion fraction tensor (f_p ) (ICC: 0.803-0.888; WCV: 1.42%-9.51%) and moderate for FA and MD of the pseudo-diffusion tensor (D^* ) (ICC: 0.487-0.532; WCV: 6.98%-10.89%). FA of D and f_p and HA of D presented good test-retest repeatability (ICC: 0.732-0.788; WCV: 3.28%-8.71%).

DATA CONCLUSION

The D and f_p indexes exhibited satisfactory repeatability, but further efforts were needed to improve repeatability of D^* indexes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.