1
|
Ghaznavi H, Maraghechi B, Zhang H, Zhu T, Laugeman E, Zhang T, Zhao T, Mazur TR, Darafsheh A. Quantitative use of cone-beam computed tomography in proton therapy: challenges and opportunities. Phys Med Biol 2025; 70:09TR01. [PMID: 40269645 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/adc86c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
The fundamental goal in radiation therapy (RT) is to simultaneously maximize tumor cell killing and healthy tissue sparing. Reducing uncertainty margins improves normal tissue sparing, but generally requires advanced techniques. Adaptive RT (ART) is a compelling technique that leverages daily imaging and anatomical information to support reduced margins and to optimize plan quality for each treatment fraction. An especially exciting avenue for ART is proton therapy (PT), which aims to combine daily plan re-optimization with the unique advantages provided by protons, including reduced integral dose and near-zero dose deposition distal to the target along the beam direction. A core component for ART is onboard image guidance, and currently two options are available on proton systems, including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CT-on-rail (CToR) imaging. While CBCT suffers from poorer image quality compared to CToR imaging, CBCT platforms can be more easily integrated with PT systems and thus may support more streamlined adaptive proton therapy (APT). In this review, we present current status of CBCT application to proton therapy dose evaluation and plan adaptation, including progress, challenges and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Ghaznavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Borna Maraghechi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center, Irvine, CA 92618, United States of America
| | - Hailei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Tong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Eric Laugeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Thomas R Mazur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Arash Darafsheh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cao N, Li Q, Sun K, Zhang H, Ding J, Wang Z, Chen W, Gao L, Sun J, Xie K, Ni X. MBST-Driven 4D-CBCT reconstruction: Leveraging swin transformer and masking for robust performance. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2025; 262:108637. [PMID: 39938253 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 02/01/2025] [Indexed: 02/14/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This research developed an innovative Mask-based Swin Transformer network (MBST) to enhance the quality of 4D cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) reconstruction. The network is trained on 4D-CBCT reconstructed under limited scanning conditions, enabling its application to a broad range of 4D-CBCT reconstruction scenarios, including those with high scanning speeds. METHODS 4D imaging data from 20 patients with thoracic tumors were used to train and evaluate the deep learning model. 15 cases were used for training, and 5 cases were employed for simulation testing. The Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm was employed to simulate 4D-CBCT from downsampled 4D-CT data to mitigate the uncertainties associated with respiratory motion between treatment fractions, and the 4D-CT data served as the ground truth for training. The study reconstructed 4D-CBCT images under 11 different scanning intervals including full angle acquisition at 1°, 2°, 3°, 4°, 5°, 6°, 12°, 18°, 24° intervals, and 1/3 full angles acquisition at 5°, 10° inrevals respectively for capturing 4D-CBCT projections. The test results were quantitatively evaluated using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), mean error (ME), and mean absolute error (MAE), and image quality was qualitatively assessed. Real clinical patients who were not included in the training were tested to evaluate the network's ability to generalize. Moreover, the proposed method was compared with other deep learning approaches, and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Simulation data assessment revealed that with small projection acquisition interval, such as the 4°interval, the 4D-CBCT images optimized by MBST showed a considerable improvement over the original 4D-CBCT images in terms of SSIM (42.3% increase) and PSNR (10.8 dB increase), and the ME and MAE values approached 0. The improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Compared with other deep learning methods, MBST demonstrated superior performance with improvements of 1.4% in SSIM and 1.21 dB in PSNR and a reduction of 0.94 in MAE. With large projection intervals, such as the 24°interval, MBST outperformed other deep learning methods. Specifically, its SSIM, PSNR, and MAE increased by 3.8%, 0.81 dB, and 10.34, respectively, compared with those of other deep learning methods, and the improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.01). In addition, MBST could reconstruct bone tissue and optimize the quality of 4D-CBCT images even when the number of projections was small (12°, 18°, 24°intervals). Clinical data evaluation revealed that after optimization by MBST, the SSIM, PSNR, ME, and MAE of 4D-CBCT compared with those of 4D-CT registration improved from the original 22.8%, 15.49 dB, -345.5, and 432.2 to 81.5%, 27.93 dB, -53.79, and 73.77, respectively. Moreover, MBST exhibited the most pronounced improvement among all the compared methods. MBST could accurately recover high-density structure, lung structures, and tracheal walls. CONCLUSION This study comprehensively demonstrated the ability of MBST to reconstruct 4D-CBCT images under various scanning conditions. When the method was tested on clinical patient datasets, its CT values and image quality achieved satisfactory results. Thus, MBST can serve as a highly generalized reconstruction network for improving the quality of 4D-CBCT images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nannan Cao
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Qilin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.1 People's Hospital, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Kangkang Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Heng Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Jiangyi Ding
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Ziyi Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Liugang Gao
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Jiawei Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Kai Xie
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China
| | - Xinye Ni
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, PR China; Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rabe M, Kurz C, Thummerer A, Landry G. Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:283-297. [PMID: 39138806 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02277-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a highly digitized field relying heavily on computational methods and, as such, has a high affinity for the automation potential afforded by modern artificial intelligence (AI). This is particularly relevant where imaging is concerned and is especially so during image-guided RT (IGRT). With the advent of online adaptive RT (ART) workflows at magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators (linacs) and at cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) linacs, the need for automation is further increased. AI as applied to modern IGRT is thus one area of RT where we can expect important developments in the near future. In this review article, after outlining modern IGRT and online ART workflows, we cover the role of AI in CBCT and MRI correction for dose calculation, auto-segmentation on IGRT imaging, motion management, and response assessment based on in-room imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Adrian Thummerer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between the DKFZ and the LMU University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taasti VT, Kneepkens E, van der Stoep J, Velders M, Cobben M, Vullings A, Buck J, Visser F, van den Bosch M, Hattu D, Mannens J, 't Ven LI, de Ruysscher D, van Loon J, Peeters S, Unipan M, Rinaldi I. Proton therapy of lung cancer patients - Treatment strategies and clinical experience from a medical physicist's perspective. Phys Med 2025; 130:104890. [PMID: 39799813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 11/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy of moving targets is considered a challenge. At Maastro, we started treating lung cancer patients with proton therapy in October 2019. In this work, we summarise the developed treatment strategies and gained clinical experience from a physics point of view. METHODS We report on our clinical approaches to treat lung cancer patients with the Mevion Hyperscan S250i proton machine. We classify lung cancer patients as small movers (tumour movement ≤ 5 mm) or large movers (tumour movement > 5 mm). The preferred beam configuration has evolved over the years of clinical treatment, and currently mostly two or three beam directions are used. All patients are treated with robustly optimised plans (5 mm setup and 3% range uncertainty). Small movers are planned based on a clinical target volume (CTV) with a 3 mm isotropic margin expansion to account for motion, while large movers are planned based on an internal target volume (ITV). All patients are treated in free-breathing. RESULTS Between October 2019 and December 2023, 379 lung cancer patients have been treated, of which 130 were large movers. The adaptation rate was 28%. The median treatment time has been reduced from 30 to 23 min. The mean dose to the heart, oesophagus, and lungs was on average 4.3, 15.4, and 11.0 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Several treatment planning and workflow improvements have been introduced over the years, resulting in an increase of treatment quality and number of treated patients, as well as reduction of planning and treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Trier Taasti
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Kneepkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith van der Stoep
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Velders
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Maud Cobben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk Vullings
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Janou Buck
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Maud van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Djoya Hattu
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jolein Mannens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke In 't Ven
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith van Loon
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Peeters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirko Unipan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Isaksson LJ, Mastroleo F, Vincini MG, Marvaso G, Zaffaroni M, Gola M, Mazzola GC, Bergamaschi L, Gaito S, Alongi F, Doyen J, Fossati P, Haustermans K, Høyer M, Langendijk JA, Matute R, Orlandi E, Schwarz M, Troost EGC, Vondracek V, La Torre D, Curigliano G, Petralia G, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. The emerging role of Artificial Intelligence in proton therapy: A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 204:104485. [PMID: 39233128 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made a tremendous impact in the space of healthcare, and proton therapy is not an exception. Proton therapy has witnessed growing popularity in oncology over recent decades, and researchers are increasingly looking to develop AI and machine learning tools to aid in various steps of the treatment planning and delivery processes. This review delves into the emergent role of AI in proton therapy, evaluating its development, advantages, intended clinical contexts, and areas of application. Through the analysis of 76 studies, we aim to underscore the importance of AI applications in advancing proton therapy and to highlight their prospective influence on clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Johannes Isaksson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Michał Gola
- Department of Human Histology and Embryology, Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn 10-082, Poland
| | - Giovanni Carlo Mazzola
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar-Verona, Italy & DSMC, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice 06189, France; University Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice (IRCAN), 06189 Nice, France, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice 06189, France
| | - Piero Fossati
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie-Curie-Str. 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria; Department of General and Translational Oncology and Hematology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, 3500, Austria
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Morten Høyer
- Aarhus University (AU), Nordre Ringgade 1, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark
| | - Johannes Albertus Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Raùl Matute
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid 28223, Spain
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Schwarz
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01309, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden 01307, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01309, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden 01328, Germany
| | - Vladimir Vondracek
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Prague, Czech Republic and Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Davide La Torre
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy; SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy; Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaushik S, Stützer K, Ödén J, Fredriksson A, Toma-Dasu I. Adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy using 4D robust planning: a proof-of-concept for the application of dose mimicking approach. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:185010. [PMID: 39214132 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad75e0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective.A four-dimensional robust optimisation (4DRO) is usually employed when the tumour respiratory motion needs to be addressed. However, it is computationally demanding, and an automated method is preferable for adaptive planning to avoid manual trial-and-error. This study proposes a 4DRO technique based on dose mimicking for automated adaptive planning.Approach.Initial plans for 4DRO intensity modulated proton therapy were created on an average CT for four patients with clinical target volume (CTV) in the lung, oesophagus, or pancreas, respectively. These plans were robustly optimised using three phases of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and accounting for setup and density uncertainties. Weekly 4DCTs were used for adaptive replanning, using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. Two methods were used: (1) template-based adaptive (TA) planning and (2) dose-mimicking-based adaptive (MA) planning. The plans were evaluated using variable RBE (vRBE) weighted doses and biologically consistent dose accumulation (BCDA).Main results.MA and TA plans had comparable CTV coverage except for one patient where the MA plan had a higher D98 and lower D2 but with an increased D2 in few organs at risk (OARs). CTV D98 deviations in non-adaptive plans from the initial plans were up to -7.2 percentage points (p.p.) in individual cases and -1.8 p.p. when using BCDA. For the OARs, MA plans showed a reduced mean dose and D2 compared to the TA plans, with few exceptions. The vRBE-weighted accumulated doses had a mean dose and D2 difference of up to 0.3 Gy and 0.5 Gy, respectively, in the OARs with respect to cRBE-weighted doses.Significance.MA plans indicate better performance in target coverage and OAR dose sparing compared to the TA plans in 4DRO adaptive planning. Moreover, MA method is capable of handling both forms of anatomical variation, namely, changes in density and relative shifts in the position of OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suryakant Kaushik
- RaySearch Laboratories AB (Publ), Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Physics, Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jakob Ödén
- RaySearch Laboratories AB (Publ), Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Department of Physics, Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cao N, Wang Z, Ding J, Zhang H, Zhang S, Gao L, Sun J, Xie K, Ni X. A 4D-CBCT correction network based on contrastive learning for dose calculation in lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:20. [PMID: 38336759 PMCID: PMC11321211 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02411-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to present a deep-learning network called contrastive learning-based cycle generative adversarial networks (CLCGAN) to mitigate streak artifacts and correct the CT value in four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) for dose calculation in lung cancer patients. METHODS 4D-CBCT and 4D computed tomography (CT) of 20 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were used to paired train the deep-learning model. The lung tumors were located in the right upper lobe, right lower lobe, left upper lobe, and left lower lobe, or in the mediastinum. Additionally, five patients to create 4D synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for test. Using the 4D-CT as the ground truth, the quality of the 4D-sCT images was evaluated by quantitative and qualitative assessment methods. The correction of CT values was evaluated holistically and locally. To further validate the accuracy of the dose calculations, we compared the dose distributions and calculations of 4D-CBCT and 4D-sCT with those of 4D-CT. RESULTS The structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of the 4D-sCT increased from 87% and 22.31 dB to 98% and 29.15 dB, respectively. Compared with cycle consistent generative adversarial networks, CLCGAN enhanced SSIM and PSNR by 1.1% (p < 0.01) and 0.42% (p < 0.01). Furthermore, CLCGAN significantly decreased the absolute mean differences of CT value in lungs, bones, and soft tissues. The dose calculation results revealed a significant improvement in 4D-sCT compared to 4D-CBCT. CLCGAN was the most accurate in dose calculations for left lung (V5Gy), right lung (V5Gy), right lung (V20Gy), PTV (D98%), and spinal cord (D2%), with the relative dose difference were reduced by 6.84%, 3.84%, 1.46%, 0.86%, 3.32% compared to 4D-CBCT. CONCLUSIONS Based on the satisfactory results obtained in terms of image quality, CT value measurement, it can be concluded that CLCGAN-based corrected 4D-CBCT can be utilized for dose calculation in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nannan Cao
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Ziyi Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Jiangyi Ding
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Heng Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Sai Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Liugang Gao
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Jiawei Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Kai Xie
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Xinye Ni
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China.
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, 213003, China.
- Center for Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China.
- Key Laboratory of Medical Physics in Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lundberg M, Meijers A, Souris K, Deffet S, Weber DC, Lomax A, Knopf A. Technical note: development of a simulation framework, enabling the investigation of locally tuned single energy proton radiography. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:027002. [PMID: 38241732 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad20a8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Range uncertainties remain a limitation for the confined dose distribution that proton therapy can offer. The uncertainty stems from the ambiguity when translating CT Hounsfield Units (HU) into proton stopping powers. Proton Radiography (PR) can be used to verify the proton range. Specifically, PR can be used as a quality-control tool for CBCT-based synthetic CTs. An essential part of the work illustrating the potential of PR has been conducted using multi-layer ionization chamber (MLIC) detectors and mono-energetic PR. Due to the dimensions of commercially available MLICs, clinical adoption is cumbersome. Here, we present a simulation framework exploring locally-tuned single energy (LTSE) proton radiography and corresponding potential compact PR detector designs. Based on a planning CT data set, the presented framework models the water equivalent thickness. Subsequently, it analyses the proton energies required to pass through the geometry within a defined ROI. In the final step, an LTSE PR is simulated using the MCsquare Monte Carlo code. In an anatomical head phantom, we illustrate that LTSE PR allows for a significantly shorter longitudinal dimension of MLICs. We compared PR simulations for two exemplary 30 × 30 mm2proton fields passing the phantom at a 90° angle at an anterior and a posterior location in an iso-centric setup. The longitudinal distance over which all spots per field range out is significantly reduced for LTSE PR compared to mono-energetic PR. In addition, we illustrate the difference in shape of integral depth dose (IDD) when using constrained PR energies. Finally, we demonstrate the accordance of simulated and experimentally acquired IDDs for an LTSE PR acquisition. As the next steps, the framework will be used to investigate the sensitivity of LTSE PR to various sources of errors. Furthermore, we will use the framework to systematically explore the dimensions of an optimized MLIC design for daily clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Måns Lundberg
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Souris
- Ion Beam Applications SA, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | | | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antje Knopf
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Koster RJC, Thummerer A, Scandurra D, Langendijk JA, Both S. Technical note: Evaluation of deep learning based synthetic CTs clinical readiness for dose and NTCP driven head and neck adaptive proton therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:8023-8033. [PMID: 37831597 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adaptive proton therapy workflows rely on accurate imaging throughout the treatment course. Our centre currently utilizes weekly repeat CTs (rCTs) for treatment monitoring and plan adaptations. However, deep learning-based methods have recently shown to successfully correct CBCT images, which suffer from severe imaging artifacts, and generate high quality synthetic CT (sCT) images which enable CBCT-based proton dose calculations. PURPOSE To compare daily CBCT-based sCT images to planning CTs (pCT) and rCTs of head and neck (HN) cancer patients to investigate the dosimetric accuracy of CBCT-based sCTs in a scenario mimicking actual clinical practice. METHODS Data of 56 HN cancer patients, previously treated with proton therapy was used to generate 1.962 sCT images, using a previously developed and trained deep convolutional neural network. Clinical IMPT treatment plans were recalculated on the pCT, weekly rCTs and daily sCTs. The dosimetric accuracy of sCTs was compared to same day rCTs and the initial planning CT. As a reference, rCTs were also compared to pCTs. The dose difference between sCTs and rCTs/pCT was quantified by calculating the D98 difference for target volumes and Dmean difference for organs-at-risk. To investigate the clinical relevancy of possible dose differences, NTCP values were calculated for dysphagia and xerostomia. RESULTS For target volumes, only minor dose differences were found for sCT versus rCT and sCT versus pCT, with dose differences mostly within ±1.5%. Larger dose differences were observed in OARs, where a general shift towards positive differences was found, with the largest difference in the left parotid gland. Delta NTCP values for grade 2 dysphagia and xerostomia were within ±2.5% for 90% of the sCTs. CONCLUSIONS Target doses showed high similarity between rCTs and sCTs. Further investigations are required to identify the origin of the dose differences at OAR levels and its relevance in clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutger J C de Koster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adrian Thummerer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Scandurra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pang B, Si H, Liu M, Fu W, Zeng Y, Liu H, Cao T, Chang Y, Quan H, Yang Z. Comparison and evaluation of different deep learning models of synthetic CT generation from CBCT for nasopharynx cancer adaptive proton therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:6920-6930. [PMID: 37800874 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning is used for patient setup in image-guided radiotherapy. However, its inaccurate CT numbers limit its applicability in dose calculation and treatment planning. PURPOSE This study compares four deep learning methods for generating synthetic CT (sCT) to determine which method is more appropriate and offers potential for further clinical exploration in adaptive proton therapy for nasopharynx cancer. METHODS CBCTs and deformed planning CT (dCT) from 75 patients (60/5/10 for training, validation and testing) were used to compare cycle-consistent Generative Adversarial Network (cycleGAN), Unet, Unet+cycleGAN and conditionalGenerative Adversarial Network (cGAN) for sCT generation. The sCT images generated by each method were evaluated against dCT images using mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), spatial non-uniformity (SNU) and radial averaging in the frequency domain. In addition, dosimetric accuracy was assessed through gamma analysis, differences in water equivalent thickness (WET), and dose-volume histogram metrics. RESULTS The cGAN model has demonstrated optimal performance in the four models across various indicators. In terms of image quality under global condition, the average MAE has been reduced to 16.39HU, SSIM has increased to 95.24%, and PSNR has increased to 28.98. Regarding dosimetric accuracy, the gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) has reached 99.02%, and the WET difference is only 1.28 mm. The D95 value of CTVs coverage and Dmax value of spinal cord, brainstem show no significant differences between dCT and sCT generated by cGAN model. CONCLUSIONS The cGAN model has been shown to be a more suitable approach for generating sCT using CBCT, considering its characteristics and concepts. The resulting sCT has the potential for application in adaptive proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Pang
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hang Si
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Muyu Liu
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wensheng Fu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yiling Zeng
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongyuan Liu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ting Cao
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Chang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong Quan
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiyong Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taasti VT, Hattu D, Peeters S, van der Salm A, van Loon J, de Ruysscher D, Nilsson R, Andersson S, Engwall E, Unipan M, Canters R. Clinical evaluation of synthetic computed tomography methods in adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100459. [PMID: 37397874 PMCID: PMC10314284 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Efficient workflows for adaptive proton therapy are of high importance. This study evaluated the possibility to replace repeat-CTs (reCTs) with synthetic CTs (sCTs), created based on cone-beam CTs (CBCTs), for flagging the need of plan adaptations in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment of lung cancer patients. Materials and methods Forty-two IMPT patients were retrospectively included. For each patient, one CBCT and a same-day reCT were included. Two commercial sCT methods were applied; one based on CBCT number correction (Cor-sCT), and one based on deformable image registration (DIR-sCT). The clinical reCT workflow (deformable contour propagation and robust dose re-computation) was performed on the reCT as well as the two sCTs. The deformed target contours on the reCT/sCTs were checked by radiation oncologists and edited if needed. A dose-volume-histogram triggered plan adaptation method was compared between the reCT and the sCTs; patients needing a plan adaptation on the reCT but not on the sCT were denoted false negatives. As secondary evaluation, dose-volume-histogram comparison and gamma analysis (2%/2mm) were performed between the reCT and sCTs. Results There were five false negatives, two for Cor-sCT and three for DIR-sCT. However, three of these were only minor, and one was caused by tumour position differences between the reCT and CBCT and not by sCT quality issues. An average gamma pass rate of 93% was obtained for both sCT methods. Conclusion Both sCT methods were judged to be of clinical quality and valuable for reducing the amount of reCT acquisitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Trier Taasti
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Djoya Hattu
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Peeters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anke van der Salm
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith van Loon
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Mirko Unipan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Canters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Graeff C, Volz L, Durante M. Emerging technologies for cancer therapy using accelerated particles. PROGRESS IN PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS 2023; 131:104046. [PMID: 37207092 PMCID: PMC7614547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Cancer therapy with accelerated charged particles is one of the most valuable biomedical applications of nuclear physics. The technology has vastly evolved in the past 50 years, the number of clinical centers is exponentially growing, and recent clinical results support the physics and radiobiology rationale that particles should be less toxic and more effective than conventional X-rays for many cancer patients. Charged particles are also the most mature technology for clinical translation of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy. However, the fraction of patients treated with accelerated particles is still very small and the therapy is only applied to a few solid cancer indications. The growth of particle therapy strongly depends on technological innovations aiming to make the therapy cheaper, more conformal and faster. The most promising solutions to reach these goals are superconductive magnets to build compact accelerators; gantryless beam delivery; online image-guidance and adaptive therapy with the support of machine learning algorithms; and high-intensity accelerators coupled to online imaging. Large international collaborations are needed to hasten the clinical translation of the research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Graeff
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lennart Volz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schmitz H, Thummerer A, Kawula M, Lombardo E, Parodi K, Belka C, Kamp F, Kurz C, Landry G. ScatterNet for projection-based 4D cone-beam computed tomography intensity correction of lung cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100482. [PMID: 37680905 PMCID: PMC10480315 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: In radiotherapy, dose calculations based on 4D cone beam CTs (4DCBCTs) require image intensity corrections. This retrospective study compared the dose calculation accuracy of a deep learning, projection-based scatter correction workflow (ScatterNet), to slower workflows: conventional 4D projection-based scatter correction (CBCTcor) and a deformable image registration (DIR)-based method (4DvCT). Materials and methods: For 26 lung cancer patients, planning CTs (pCTs), 4DCTs and CBCT projections were available. ScatterNet was trained with pairs of raw and corrected CBCT projections. Corrected projections from ScatterNet and the conventional workflow were reconstructed using MA-ROOSTER, yielding 4DCBCTSN and 4DCBCTcor. The 4DvCT was generated by 4DCT to 4DCBCT DIR, as part of the 4DCBCTcor workflow. Robust intensity modulated proton therapy treatment plans were created on free-breathing pCTs. 4DCBCTSN was compared to 4DCBCTcor and the 4DvCT in terms of image quality and dose calculation accuracy (dose-volume-histogram parameters and 3 % /3 mm gamma analysis). Results: 4DCBCTSN resulted in an average mean absolute error of 87 HU and 102 HU when compared to 4DCBCTcor and 4DvCT respectively. High agreement was observed in targets with median dose differences of 0.4 Gy (4DCBCTSN-4DCBCTcor) and 0.3 Gy (4DCBCTSN-4DvCT). The gamma analysis showed high average 3 % /3 mm pass rates of 96 % for both 4DCBCTSN vs. 4DCBCTcor and 4DCBCTSN vs. 4DvCT. Conclusions: Accurate 4D dose calculations are feasible for lung cancer patients using ScatterNet for 4DCBCT correction. Average scatter correction times could be reduced from 10 min (4DCBCTcor) to 3.9 s , showing the clinical suitability of the proposed deep learning-based method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Schmitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrian Thummerer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Kawula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elia Lombardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching (Munich), Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pang J, Xiu W, Ma X. Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Evaluation of Mediastinal Malignant Tumors. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082818. [PMID: 37109155 PMCID: PMC10144939 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), also known as machine intelligence, is widely utilized in the medical field, promoting medical advances. Malignant tumors are the critical focus of medical research and improvement of clinical diagnosis and treatment. Mediastinal malignancy is an important tumor that attracts increasing attention today due to the difficulties in treatment. Combined with artificial intelligence, challenges from drug discovery to survival improvement are constantly being overcome. This article reviews the progress of the use of AI in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic prospects of mediastinal malignant tumors based on current literature findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyun Pang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Weigang Xiu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xuelei Ma
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Inter- and intrafractional 4D dose accumulation for evaluating ΔNTCP robustness in lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109488. [PMID: 36706960 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Model-based selection of proton therapy patients relies on a predefined reduction in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) with respect to photon therapy. The decision is necessarily made based on the treatment plan, but NTCP can be affected when the delivered treatment deviates from the plan due to delivery inaccuracies. Especially for proton therapy of lung cancer, this can be important because of tissue density changes and, with pencil beam scanning, the interplay effect between the proton beam and breathing motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this work, we verified whether the expected benefit of proton therapy is retained despite delivery inaccuracies by reconstructing the delivered treatment using log-file based dose reconstruction and inter- and intrafractional accumulation. Additionally, the importance of two uncertain parameters for treatment reconstruction, namely deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm and α/β ratio, was assessed. RESULTS The expected benefit or proton therapy was confirmed in 97% of all studied cases, despite regular differences up to 2 percent point (p.p.) NTCP between the delivered and planned treatments. The choice of DIR algorithm affected NTCP up to 1.6 p.p., an order of magnitude higher than the effect of α/β ratio. CONCLUSION For the patient population and treatment technique employed, the predicted clinical benefit for patients selected for proton therapy was confirmed for 97.0% percent of all cases, although the NTCP based proton selection was subject to 2 p.p. variations due to delivery inaccuracies.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang H, Liu X, Kong L, Huang Y, Chen H, Ma X, Duan Y, Shao Y, Feng A, Shen Z, Gu H, Kong Q, Xu Z, Zhou Y. Improving CBCT image quality to the CT level using RegGAN in esophageal cancer adaptive radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:485-497. [PMID: 36688953 PMCID: PMC10133081 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02039-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to improve the image quality and CT Hounsfield unit accuracy of daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using registration generative adversarial networks (RegGAN) and apply synthetic CT (sCT) images to dose calculations in radiotherapy. METHODS The CBCT/planning CT images of 150 esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy were used for training (120 patients) and testing (30 patients). An unsupervised deep-learning method, the 2.5D RegGAN model with an adaptively trained registration network, was proposed, through which sCT images were generated. The quality of deep-learning-generated sCT images was quantitatively compared to the reference deformed CT (dCT) image using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) of Hounsfield units (HU), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The dose calculation accuracy was further evaluated for esophageal cancer radiotherapy plans, and the same plans were calculated on dCT, CBCT, and sCT images. RESULTS The quality of sCT images produced by RegGAN was significantly improved compared to the original CBCT images. ReGAN achieved image quality in the testing patients with MAE sCT vs. CBCT: 43.7 ± 4.8 vs. 80.1 ± 9.1; RMSE sCT vs. CBCT: 67.2 ± 12.4 vs. 124.2 ± 21.8; and PSNR sCT vs. CBCT: 27.9 ± 5.6 vs. 21.3 ± 4.2. The sCT images generated by the RegGAN model showed superior accuracy on dose calculation, with higher gamma passing rates (93.3 ± 4.4, 90.4 ± 5.2, and 84.3 ± 6.6) compared to original CBCT images (89.6 ± 5.7, 85.7 ± 6.9, and 72.5 ± 12.5) under the criteria of 3 mm/3%, 2 mm/2%, and 1 mm/1%, respectively. CONCLUSION The proposed deep-learning RegGAN model seems promising for generation of high-quality sCT images from stand-alone thoracic CBCT images in an efficient way and thus has the potential to support CBCT-based esophageal cancer adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | | | - Ying Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiurui Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanhua Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Aihui Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenjiong Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hengle Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Kong
- Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyong Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongkang Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|