Patient-specific quality assurance for deformable IMRT/IMPT dose accumulation: Proposition and validation of energy conservation based validation criterion

An energy-conserving dose summation method for dose accumulation in radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy often requires the accumulation of doses from multiple treatment fractions or courses for plan evaluation and treatment response assessment. However, due to underlying mass changes, the accumulated dose may not accurately reflect the total deposited energy, leading to potential inaccuracies in characterizing the treatment input.

PURPOSE

This study introduces an energy-conserving dose summation method to calculate the total dose in scenarios where patients experience changes in body mass during treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The proposed method transfers dose and mass data from dosimetry images, where the delivered doses were calculated, to a reference image using an energy and mass-conserving dose reconstruction technique. The reconstructed dose assumes the same resolution and dimension as the reference image. The transferred masses are averaged at each image voxel in the reference image to generate an average mass. The transferred doses are then adjusted by multiplying by the ratio of their transferred mass to the average mass, and subsequently summed to calculate a mass-weighted (MW) total dose at each voxel. This method is demonstrated with a case of lung cancer retreatment.

RESULTS

The MW total dose was shown to be equivalent to the total deposited energy divided by the average mass. In the lung cancer retreatment case, the energy derived from the MW total dose was consistent with the sum of energy transferred from two treatments across all evaluated organs.

CONCLUSION

The MW dose summation method can produce a total dose that accurately reflects the total energy deposited in each organ. The consistency may provide a robust foundation for verifying dose accumulations in adaptive radiotherapy.

Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon and electron radiotherapy on dynamically deforming anatomy

BACKGROUND

Dose calculation in radiotherapy aims to accurately estimate and assess the dose distribution of a treatment plan. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is considered the gold standard owing to its ability to accurately simulate particle transport in inhomogeneous media. However, uncertainties such as the patient's dynamically deforming anatomy can still lead to differences between the delivered and planned dose distribution.

PURPOSE

Development and validation of a deformable voxel geometry for MC dose calculations (DefVoxMC) to account for dynamic deformation in the dose calculation process of photon- and electron-based radiotherapy treatment plans for clinically motivated cases.

METHODS

DefVoxMC relies on the subdivision of a regular voxel geometry into dodecahedrons. It allows shifting the dodecahedrons' corner points according to the deformation in the patient's anatomy using deformation vector fields (DVF). DefVoxMC is integrated into the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP) to allow the MC dose calculation of photon- and electron-based treatment plans on the deformable voxel geometry. DefVoxMC is validated in two steps. A compression test and a Fano test are performed in silico. Delta4 (for photon beams) and EBT4 film measurements in a cubic PMMA phantom (for electron beams) are performed on a TrueBeam in Developer Mode for clinically motivated treatment plans. During these measurements, table motion is used to mimic rigid dynamic patient motion. The measured and calculated dose distributions are compared using gamma passing rate (GPR) (3% / 2 mm (global), 10% threshold). DefVoxMC is used to study the impact of patient-recorded breathing motion on the dose distribution for clinically motivated lung and breast cases, each prescribed 50 Gy to 50% of the target volume. A volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and an arc mixed-beam radiotherapy (Arc-MBRT) plan are created for the lung and breast case, respectively. For the dose calculation, the dynamic deformation of the patient's anatomy is described by DVFs obtained from deformable image registration of the different phases of 4DCTs. The resulting dose distributions are compared to the ones of the static situation using dose-volume histograms and dose differences.

RESULTS

DefVoxMC is successfully integrated into the SMCP to enable the MC dose calculation of photon- and electron-based treatments on a dynamically deforming patient anatomy. The compression and the Fano test agree within 1.0% and 0.1% with the expected result, respectively. Delta4 and EBT4 film measurements agree with the calculated dose by a GPR >95%. For the clinically motivated cases, breathing motion resulted in areas with a dose increase of up to 26.9 Gy (lung) and up to 7.6 Gy (breast) compared to the static situation. The largest dose differences are observed in high-dose-gradient regions perpendicular to the beam plane, consequently decreasing the planning target volume coverage (V95%) by 4.2% for the lung case and 2.0% for the breast case.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel method for MC dose calculation for photon- and electron-based treatments on dynamically deforming anatomy is successfully developed and validated. Applying DefVoxMC to clinically motivated cases, we found that breathing motion has non-negligible impact on the dosimetric plan quality.

Quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties for dose accumulation on head and neck cancer proton treatments

PURPOSE

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in radiotherapy require adaptive treatment plans due to anatomical changes. Deformable image registration (DIR) is used in adaptive radiotherapy, e.g. for deformable dose accumulation (DDA). However, DIR's ill-posedness necessitates addressing uncertainties, often overlooked in clinical implementations. DIR's further clinical implementation is hindered by missing quantitative commissioning and quality assurance tools. This study evaluates one pathway for more quantitative DDA uncertainties.

METHODS

For five HNC patients, each with multiple repeated CTs acquired during treatment, a simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) plan was optimized. Recalculated doses were warped individually using multiple DIRs from repeated to reference CTs, and voxel-by-voxel dose ranges determined an error-bar for DDA. Followed by evaluating, a previously proposed early-stage DDA uncertainty estimation method tested for lung cancer, which combines geometric DIR uncertainties, dose gradients and their directional dependence, in the context of HNC.

RESULTS

Applying multiple DIRs show dose differences, pronounced in high dose gradient regions. The patient with largest anatomical changes (-13.1 % in ROI body volume), exhibited 33 % maximum uncertainty in contralateral parotid, with 54 % of voxels presenting an uncertainty >5 %. Accumulation over multiple CTs partially mitigated uncertainties. The estimation approach predicted 92.6 % of voxels within ±5 % to the reference dose uncertainty across all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DIR variations impact accumulated doses, emphasizing DDA uncertainty quantification's importance for HNC patients. Multiple DIR dose warping aids in quantifying DDA uncertainties. An estimation approach previously described for lung cancer was successfully validated for HNC, for SIB plans, presenting different dose gradients, and for accumulated treatments.

Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications

Deformable image registration (DIR) is a versatile tool used in many applications in radiotherapy (RT). DIR algorithms have been implemented in many commercial treatment planning systems providing accessible and easy-to-use solutions. However, the geometric uncertainty of DIR can be large and difficult to quantify, resulting in barriers to clinical practice. Currently, there is no agreement in the RT community on how to quantify these uncertainties and determine thresholds that distinguish a good DIR result from a poor one. This review summarises the current literature on sources of DIR uncertainties and their impact on RT applications. Recommendations are provided on how to handle these uncertainties for patient-specific use, commissioning, and research. Recommendations are also provided for developers and vendors to help users to understand DIR uncertainties and make the application of DIR in RT safer and more reliable.