3D whole-heart isotropic-resolution motion-compensated joint T1 /T2 mapping and water/fat imaging

Free-breathing 3D whole-heart joint T1/T2 mapping and water/fat imaging at 0.55 T

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a highly efficient motion compensated free-breathing isotropic resolution 3D whole-heart joint T1/T2 mapping sequence with anatomical water/fat imaging at 0.55 T.

METHODS

The proposed sequence takes advantage of shorter T1 at 0.55 T to acquire three interleaved water/fat volumes with inversion-recovery preparation, no preparation, and T2 preparation, respectively. Image navigators were used to facilitate nonrigid motion-compensated image reconstruction. T1 and T2 maps were jointly calculated by a dictionary matching method. Validations were performed with simulation, phantom, and in vivo experiments on 10 healthy volunteers and 1 patient. The performance of the proposed sequence was compared with conventional 2D mapping sequences including modified Look-Locker inversion recovery and T2-prepared balanced steady-SSFP sequence.

RESULTS

The proposed sequence has a good T1 and T2 encoding sensitivity in simulation, and excellent agreement with spin-echo reference T1 and T2 values was observed in a standardized T1/T2 phantom (R2 = 0.99). In vivo experiments provided good-quality co-registered 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 maps with 2-mm isotropic resolution in a short scan time of about 7 min. For healthy volunteers, left-ventricle T1 mean and SD measured by the proposed sequence were both comparable with those of modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (640 ± 35 vs. 630 ± 25 ms [p = 0.44] and 49.9 ± 9.3 vs. 54.4 ± 20.5 ms [p = 0.42]), whereas left-ventricle T2 mean and SD measured by the proposed sequence were both slightly lower than those of T2-prepared balanced SSFP (53.8 ± 5.5 vs. 58.6 ± 3.3 ms [p < 0.01] and 5.2 ± 0.9 vs. 6.1 ± 0.8 ms [p = 0.03]). Myocardial T1 and T2 in the patient measured by the proposed sequence were in good agreement with conventional 2D sequences and late gadolinium enhancement.

CONCLUSION

The proposed sequence simultaneously acquires 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping with anatomical water/fat imaging at 0.55 T in a fast and efficient 7-min scan. Further investigation in patients with cardiovascular disease is now warranted.

Non-rigid motion-compensated 3D whole-heart T2 mapping in a hybrid 3T PET-MR system

PURPOSE

Simultaneous PET-MRI improves inflammatory cardiac disease diagnosis. However, challenges persist in respiratory motion and mis-registration between free-breathing 3D PET and 2D breath-held MR images. We propose a free-breathing non-rigid motion-compensated 3D T2 -mapping sequence enabling whole-heart myocardial tissue characterization in a hybrid 3T PET-MR system and provides non-rigid respiratory motion fields to correct also simultaneously acquired PET data.

METHODS

Free-breathing 3D whole-heart T2 -mapping was implemented on a hybrid 3T PET-MRI system. Three datasets were acquired with different T2 -preparation modules (0, 28, 55 ms) using 3-fold undersampled variable-density Cartesian trajectory. Respiratory motion was estimated via virtual 3D image navigators, enabling multi-contrast non-rigid motion-corrected MR reconstruction. T2 -maps were computed using dictionary-matching. Approach was tested in phantom, 8 healthy subjects, 14 MR only and 2 PET-MR patients with suspected cardiac disease and compared with spin echo reference (phantom) and clinical 2D T2 -mapping (in-vivo).

RESULTS

Phantom results show a high correlation (R2  = 0.996) between proposed approach and gold standard 2D T2 mapping. In-vivo 3D T2 -mapping average values in healthy subjects (39.0 ± 1.4 ms) and patients (healthy tissue) (39.1 ± 1.4 ms) agree with conventional 2D T2 -mapping (healthy = 38.6 ± 1.2 ms, patients = 40.3 ± 1.7 ms). Bland-Altman analysis reveals bias of 1.8 ms and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of -2.4-6 ms for healthy subjects, and bias of 1.3 ms and 95% LOA of -1.9 to 4.6 ms for patients.

CONCLUSION

Validated efficient 3D whole-heart T2 -mapping at hybrid 3T PET-MRI provides myocardial inflammation characterization and non-rigid respiratory motion fields for simultaneous PET data correction. Comparable T2 values were achieved with both 3D and 2D methods. Improved image quality was observed in the PET images after MR-based motion correction.

3D whole heart k-space-based super-resolution cardiac T1 mapping using rotated stacks

Objective. To provide three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart high-resolution isotropic cardiac T1 maps using a k-space-based through-plane super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) with rotated multi-slice stacks.Approach. Due to limited SNR and cardiac motion, often only 2D T1 maps with low through-plane resolution (4-8 mm) can be obtained. Previous approaches used SRR to calculate 3D high-resolution isotropic cardiac T1 maps. However, they were limited to the ventricles. The proposed approach acquires rotated stacks in long-axis orientation with high in-plane resolution but low through-plane resolution. This results in radially overlapping stacks from which high-resolution T1 maps of the whole heart are reconstructed using a k-space-based SRR framework considering the complete acquisition model. Cardiac and residual respiratory motion between different breath holds is estimated and incorporated into the reconstruction. The proposed approach was evaluated in simulations and phantom experiments and successfully applied to ten healthy subjects.Main results. 3D T1 maps of the whole heart were obtained in the same acquisition time as previous methods covering only the ventricles. T1 measurements were possible even for small structures, such as the atrial wall. The proposed approach provided accurate (P> 0.4;R2> 0.99) and precise T1 values (SD of 64.32 ± 22.77 ms in the proposed approach, 44.73 ± 31.9 ms in the reference). The edge sharpness of the T1 maps was increased by 6.20% and 4.73% in simulation and phantom experiments, respectively. Contrast-to-noise ratios between the septum and blood pool increased by 14.50% inin vivomeasurements with a k-space compared to an image-space-based SRR.Significance. The proposed approach provided whole-heart high-resolution 1.3 mm isotropic T1 maps in an overall acquisition time of approximately three minutes. Small structures, such as the atrial and right ventricular walls, could be visualized in the T1 maps.

The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1)

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the "all-in-one" approaches, and Part 2 the "real-time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.

Free-breathing simultaneous native myocardial T1, T2 and T1ρ mapping with Cartesian acquisition and dictionary matching

BACKGROUND

T1, T2 and T1ρ are well-recognized parameters for quantitative cardiac MRI. Simultaneous estimation of these parameters allows for comprehensive myocardial tissue characterization, such as myocardial fibrosis and edema. However, conventional techniques either quantify the parameters individually with separate breath-hold acquisitions, which may result in unregistered parameter maps, or estimate multiple parameters in a prolonged breath-hold acquisition, which may be intolerable to patients. We propose a free-breathing multi-parametric mapping (FB-MultiMap) technique that provides co-registered myocardial T1, T2 and T1ρ maps in a single efficient acquisition.

METHODS

The proposed FB-MultiMap performs electrocardiogram-triggered single-shot Cartesian acquisition over 16 consecutive cardiac cycles, where inversion, T2 and T1ρ preparations are introduced for varying contrasts. A diaphragmatic navigator was used for prospective through-plane motion correction and the in-plane motion was corrected retrospectively with a group-wise image registration method. Quantitative mapping was conducted through dictionary matching of the motion corrected images, where the subject-specific dictionary was created using Bloch simulations for a range of T1, T2 and T1ρ values, as well as B1 factors to account for B1 inhomogeneities. The FB-MultiMap was optimized and validated in numerical simulations, phantom experiments, and in vivo imaging of 15 healthy subjects and six patients with suspected cardiac diseases.

RESULTS

The phantom T1, T2 and T1ρ values estimated with FB-MultiMap agreed well with reference measurements with no dependency on heart rate. In healthy subjects, FB-MultiMap T1 was higher than MOLLI T1 mapping (1218 ± 50 ms vs. 1166 ± 38 ms, p < 0.001). The myocardial T2 and T1ρ estimated with FB-MultiMap were lower compared to the mapping with T2- or T1ρ-prepared 2D balanced steady-state free precession (T2: 41.2 ± 2.8 ms vs. 42.5 ± 3.1 ms, p = 0.06; T1ρ: 45.3 ± 4.4 ms vs. 50.2 ± 4.0, p < 0.001). The pathological changes in myocardial parameters measured with FB-MultiMap were consistent with conventional techniques in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The proposed free-breathing multi-parametric mapping technique provides co-registered myocardial T1, T2 and T1ρ maps in 16 heartbeats, achieving similar mapping quality to conventional breath-hold mapping methods.

Motion-compensated T1 mapping in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a technical review

T 1 mapping is becoming a staple magnetic resonance imaging method for diagnosing myocardial diseases such as ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and more. Clinically, most T 1 mapping sequences acquire a single slice at a single cardiac phase across a 10 to 15-heartbeat breath-hold, with one to three slices acquired in total. This leaves opportunities for improving patient comfort and information density by acquiring data across multiple cardiac phases in free-running acquisitions and across multiple respiratory phases in free-breathing acquisitions. Scanning in the presence of cardiac and respiratory motion requires more complex motion characterization and compensation. Most clinical mapping sequences use 2D single-slice acquisitions; however newer techniques allow for motion-compensated reconstructions in three dimensions and beyond. To further address confounding factors and improve measurement accuracy, T 1 maps can be acquired jointly with other quantitative parameters such as T 2 , T 2 ∗ , fat fraction, and more. These multiparametric acquisitions allow for constrained reconstruction approaches that isolate contributions to T 1 from other motion and relaxation mechanisms. In this review, we examine the state of the literature in motion-corrected and motion-resolved T 1 mapping, with potential future directions for further technical development and clinical translation.

MR Multitasking-based multi-dimensional assessment of cardiovascular system (MT-MACS) with extended spatial coverage and water-fat separation

PURPOSE

To extend the MR MultiTasking-based Multidimensional Assessment of Cardiovascular System (MT-MACS) technique with larger spatial coverage and water-fat separation for comprehensive aortocardiac assessment.

METHODS

MT-MACS adopts a low-rank tensor image model for 7D imaging, with three spatial dimensions for volumetric imaging, one cardiac motion dimension for cine imaging, one respiratory motion dimension for free-breathing imaging, one T2-prepared inversion recovery time dimension for multi-contrast assessment, and one T2*-decay time dimension for water-fat separation. Nine healthy subjects were recruited for the 3T study. Overall image quality was scored on bright-blood (BB), dark-blood (DB), and gray-blood (GB) contrasts using a 4-point scale (0-poor to 3-excellent) by two independent readers, and their interreader agreement was evaluated. Myocardial wall thickness and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were quantified on DB and BB contrasts, respectively. The agreement in these metrics between MT-MACS and conventional breath-held, electrocardiography-triggered 2D sequences were evaluated.

RESULTS

MT-MACS provides both water-only and fat-only images with excellent image quality (average score = 3.725/3.780/3.835/3.890 for BB/DB/GB/fat-only images) and moderate to high interreader agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa value = 0.727/0.668/1.000/1.000 for BB/DB/GB/fat-only images). There were good to excellent agreements in myocardial wall thickness measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] = 0.781/0.929/0.680/0.878 for left atria/left ventricle/right atria/right ventricle) and LVEF quantification (ICC = 0.716) between MT-MACS and 2D references. All measurements were within the literature range of healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

The refined MT-MACS technique provides multi-contrast, phase-resolved, and water-fat imaging of the aortocardiac systems and allows evaluation of anatomy and function. Clinical validation is warranted.

Latest Advances in Image Acceleration: All Dimensions are Fair Game

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a versatile modality that can generate high-resolution images with a variety of tissue contrasts. However, MRI is a slow technique and requires long acquisition times, which increase with higher temporal and spatial resolution and/or when multiple contrasts and large volumetric coverage is required. In order to speedup MR data acquisition, several approaches have been introduced in the literature. Most of these techniques acquire less data than required and exploit intrinsic redundancies in the MR images to recover the information that was not sampled. This article presents a review of MR acquisition and reconstruction methods that have exploited redundancies in the temporal, spatial, and contrast/parametric dimensions to accelerate image data acquisition, focusing on cardiac and abdominal MR imaging applications. The review describes how each of these dimensions has been separately exploited for speeding up MR acquisition to then discuss more advanced techniques where multiple dimensions are exploited together for further reducing scan times. Finally, future directions for multidimensional image acceleration and remaining technical challenges are discussed. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 1.

Quantitative MRI in cardiometabolic disease: From conventional cardiac and liver tissue mapping techniques to multi-parametric approaches

Cardiometabolic disease refers to the spectrum of chronic conditions that include diabetes, hypertension, atheromatosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and their long-term impact on cardiovascular health. Histological studies have confirmed several modifications at the tissue level in cardiometabolic disease. Recently, quantitative MR methods have enabled non-invasive myocardial and liver tissue characterization. MR relaxation mapping techniques such as T₁, T_1ρ, T₂ and T₂* provide a pixel-by-pixel representation of the corresponding tissue specific relaxation times, which have been shown to correlate with fibrosis, altered tissue perfusion, oedema and iron levels. Proton density fat fraction mapping approaches allow measurement of lipid tissue in the organ of interest. Several studies have demonstrated their utility as early diagnostic biomarkers and their potential to bear prognostic implications. Conventionally, the quantification of these parameters by MRI relies on the acquisition of sequential scans, encoding and mapping only one parameter per scan. However, this methodology is time inefficient and suffers from the confounding effects of the relaxation parameters in each single map, limiting wider clinical and research applications. To address these limitations, several novel approaches have been proposed that encode multiple tissue parameters simultaneously, providing co-registered multiparametric information of the tissues of interest. This review aims to describe the multi-faceted myocardial and hepatic tissue alterations in cardiometabolic disease and to motivate the application of relaxometry and proton-density cardiac and liver tissue mapping techniques. Current approaches in myocardial and liver tissue characterization as well as latest technical developments in multiparametric quantitative MRI are included. Limitations and challenges of these novel approaches, and recommendations to facilitate clinical validation are also discussed.

Free-running 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping and cine MRI using low-rank reconstruction with non-rigid cardiac motion correction

PURPOSE

To introduce non-rigid cardiac motion correction into a novel free-running framework for the simultaneous acquisition of 3D whole-heart myocardial <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> maps and cine images, enabling a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \sim $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 3-min scan.

METHODS

Data were acquired using a free-running 3D golden-angle radial readout interleaved with inversion recovery and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> -preparation pulses. After correction for translational respiratory motion, non-rigid cardiac-motion-corrected reconstruction with dictionary-based low-rank compression and patch-based regularization enabled 3D whole-heart <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> mapping at any given cardiac phase as well as whole-heart cardiac cine imaging. The framework was validated and compared with established methods in 11 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Good quality 3D <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> maps and cine images were reconstructed for all subjects. Septal <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> values using the proposed approach ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1200</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 1200\pm 50 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms) were higher than those from a 2D MOLLI sequence ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1063</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 1063\pm 33 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms), which is known to underestimate <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , while <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> values from the proposed approach ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>51</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 51\pm 4 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms) were in good agreement with those from a 2D GraSE sequence ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>51</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 51\pm 2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms).

CONCLUSION

The proposed technique provides 3D <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> maps and cine images with isotropic spatial resolution in a single <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \sim $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 3.3-min scan.

3D model-based super-resolution motion-corrected cardiac T1 mapping

Objective. To provide 3D high-resolution cardiac T1 maps using model-based super-resolution reconstruction (SRR).Approach. Due to signal-to-noise ratio limitations and the motion of the heart during imaging, often 2D T1 maps with only low through-plane resolution (i.e. slice thickness of 6-8 mm) can be obtained. Here, a model-based SRR approach is presented, which combines multiple stacks of 2D acquisitions with 6-8 mm slice thickness and generates 3D high-resolution T1 maps with a slice thickness of 1.5-2 mm. Every stack was acquired in a different breath hold (BH) and any misalignment between BH was corrected retrospectively. The novelty of the proposed approach is the BH correction and the application of model-based SRR on cardiac T1 Mapping. The proposed approach was evaluated in numerical simulations and phantom experiments and demonstrated in four healthy subjects.Main results. Alignment of BH states was essential for SRR even in healthy volunteers. In simulations, respiratory motion could be estimated with an RMS error of 0.18 ± 0.28 mm. SRR improved the visualization of small structures. High accuracy and precision (average standard deviation of 69.62 ms) of the T1 values was ensured by SRR while the detectability of small structures increased by 40%.Significance. The proposed SRR approach provided T1 maps with high in-plane and high through-plane resolution (1.3 × 1.3 × 1.5-2 mm³). The approach led to improvements in the visualization of small structures and precise T1 values.

Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development

Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques (SMART) are gaining attention for their potential to overcome some of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging's (CMR) clinical limitations. The major advantages of SMART lie within their ability to simultaneously capture multiple "features" such as cardiac motion, respiratory motion, T1/T2 relaxation. This review aims to summarize the overarching theory of SMART, describing key concepts that many of these techniques share to produce co-registered, high quality CMR images in less time and with less requirements for specialized personnel. Further, this review provides an overview of the recent developments in the field of SMART by describing how they work, the parameters they can acquire, their status of clinical testing and validation, and by providing examples for how their use can improve the current state of clinical CMR workflows. Many of the SMART are in early phases of development and testing, thus larger scale, controlled trials are needed to evaluate their use in clinical setting and with different cardiac pathologies.

Artificial intelligence in cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a fast MRI-based technique that allows for multiparametric quantitative characterization of the tissues of interest in a single acquisition. In particular, it has gained attention in the field of cardiac imaging due to its ability to provide simultaneous and co-registered myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping in a single breath-held cardiac MRF scan, in addition to other parameters. Initial results in small healthy subject groups and clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility and potential of MRF imaging. Ongoing research is being conducted to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of cardiac MRF. However, these improvements usually increase the complexity of image reconstruction and dictionary generation and introduce the need for sequence optimization. Each of these steps increase the computational demand and processing time of MRF. The latest advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including progress in deep learning and the development of neural networks for MRI, now present an opportunity to efficiently address these issues. Artificial intelligence can be used to optimize candidate sequences and reduce the memory demand and computational time required for reconstruction and post-processing. Recently, proposed machine learning-based approaches have been shown to reduce dictionary generation and reconstruction times by several orders of magnitude. Such applications of AI should help to remove these bottlenecks and speed up cardiac MRF, improving its practical utility and allowing for its potential inclusion in clinical routine. This review aims to summarize the latest developments in artificial intelligence applied to cardiac MRF. Particularly, we focus on the application of machine learning at different steps of the MRF process, such as sequence optimization, dictionary generation and image reconstruction.

Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping

The Multimapping technique was recently proposed for simultaneous myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping. In this study, we evaluate its correlation with clinical reference mapping techniques in patients with a range of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and compare image quality and inter- and intra-observer repeatability. Multimapping consists of an ECG-triggered, 2D single-shot bSSFP readout with inversion recovery and T₂ preparation modules, acquired across 10 cardiac cycles. The sequence was implemented at 1.5T and compared to clinical reference mapping techniques, modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and T₂ prepared bSSFP with four echo times (T₂bSSFP), and compared in 47 patients with CVD (of which 44 were analyzed). In diseased myocardial segments (defined as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement), there was a high correlation between Multimapping and MOLLI for native myocardium T₁ (r² = 0.73), ECV (r² = 0.91), and blood T₁ (r² = 0.88), and Multimapping and T₂bSSFP for native myocardial T₂ (r² = 0.80). In healthy myocardial segments, a bias for native T₁ (Multimapping = 1,116 ± 21 ms, MOLLI = 1,002 ± 21, P < 0.001), post-contrast T₁ (Multimapping = 479 ± 31 ms, MOLLI = 426 ± 27 ms, 0.001), ECV (Multimapping = 21.5 ± 1.9%, MOLLI = 23.7 ± 2.3%, P = 0.001), and native T₂ (Multimapping = 48.0 ± 3.0 ms, T₂bSSFP = 53.9 ± 3.5 ms, P < 0.001) was observed. The image quality for Multimapping was scored as higher for all mapping techniques (native T₁, post-contrast T₁, ECV, and T₂bSSFP) compared to the clinical reference techniques. The inter- and intra-observer agreements were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.9) for most measurements, except for inter-observer repeatability of Multimapping native T₁ (ICC = 0.87), post-contrast T₁ (ICC = 0.73), and T₂bSSFP native T₂ (ICC = 0.88). Multimapping shows high correlations with clinical reference mapping techniques for T₁, T₂, and ECV in a diverse cohort of patients with different cardiovascular diseases. Multimapping enables simultaneous T₁ and T₂ mapping and can be performed in a short breath-hold, with image quality superior to that of the clinical reference techniques.

T2 mapping in myocardial disease: a comprehensive review

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold standard imaging modality for myocardial tissue characterization. Elevated transverse relaxation time (T2) is specific for increased myocardial water content, increased free water, and is used as an index of myocardial edema. The strengths of quantitative T2 mapping lie in the accurate characterization of myocardial edema, and the early detection of reversible myocardial disease without the use of contrast agents or ionizing radiation. Quantitative T2 mapping overcomes the limitations of T2-weighted imaging for reliable assessment of diffuse myocardial edema and can be used to diagnose, stage, and monitor myocardial injury. Strong evidence supports the clinical use of T2 mapping in acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, heart transplant rejection, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Accumulating data support the utility of T2 mapping for the assessment of other cardiomyopathies, rheumatologic conditions with cardiac involvement, and monitoring for cancer therapy-related cardiac injury. Importantly, elevated T2 relaxation time may be the first sign of myocardial injury in many diseases and oftentimes precedes symptoms, changes in ejection fraction, and irreversible myocardial remodeling. This comprehensive review discusses the technical considerations and clinical roles of myocardial T2 mapping with an emphasis on expanding the impact of this unique, noninvasive tissue parameter.

The Road Toward Reproducibility of Parametric Mapping of the Heart: A Technical Review

Parametric mapping of the heart has become an essential part of many cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging exams, and is used for tissue characterization and diagnosis in a broad range of cardiovascular diseases. These pulse sequences are used to quantify the myocardial T₁, T₂, T2*, and T_1ρ relaxation times, which are unique surrogate indices of fibrosis, edema and iron deposition that can be used to monitor a disease over time or to compare patients to one another. Parametric mapping is now well-accepted in the clinical setting, but its wider dissemination is hindered by limited inter-center reproducibility and relatively long acquisition times. Recently, several new parametric mapping techniques have appeared that address both of these problems, but substantial hurdles remain for widespread clinical adoption. This review serves both as a primer for newcomers to the field of parametric mapping and as a technical update for those already well at home in it. It aims to establish what is currently needed to improve the reproducibility of parametric mapping of the heart. To this end, we first give an overview of the metrics by which a mapping technique can be assessed, such as bias and variability, as well as the basic physics behind the relaxation times themselves and what their relevance is in the prospect of myocardial tissue characterization. This is followed by a summary of routine mapping techniques and their variations. The problems in reproducibility and the sources of bias and variability of these techniques are reviewed. Subsequently, novel fast, whole-heart, and multi-parametric techniques and their merits are treated in the light of their reproducibility. This includes state of the art segmentation techniques applied to parametric maps, and how artificial intelligence is being harnessed to solve this long-standing conundrum. We finish up by sketching an outlook on the road toward inter-center reproducibility, and what to expect in the future.

Cartesian dictionary-based native T1 and T2 mapping of the myocardium

PURPOSE

To implement and evaluate a new dictionary-based technique for native myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping using Cartesian sampling.

METHODS

The proposed technique (Multimapping) consisted of single-shot Cartesian image acquisitions in 10 consecutive cardiac cycles, with inversion pulses in cycle 1 and 5, and T₂ preparation (TE: 30 ms, 50 ms, and 70 ms) in cycles 8-10. Multimapping was simulated for different T₁ and T₂ , where entries corresponding to the k-space centers were matched to acquired data. Experiments were performed in a phantom, 16 healthy subjects, and 3 patients with cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Multimapping phantom measurements showed good agreement with reference values for both T₁ and T₂ , with no discernable heart-rate dependency for T₁ and T₂ within the range of myocardium. In vivo mean T₁ in healthy subjects was significantly higher using Multimapping (T₁ = 1114 ± 14 ms) compared to the reference (T₁ = 991 ± 26 ms) (p < 0.01). Mean Multimapping T₂ (47.1 ± 1.3 ms) and T₂ spatial variability (5.8 ± 1.0 ms) was significantly lower compared to the reference (T₂ = 54.7 ± 2.2 ms, p < 0.001; spatial variability = 8.4 ± 2.0 ms, p < 0.01). Increased T₁ and T₂ was detected in all patients using Multimapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimapping allows for simultaneous native myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping with a conventional Cartesian trajectory, demonstrating promising in vivo image quality and parameter quantification results.

Feasibility of cardiac-synchronized quantitative T1 and T2 mapping on a hybrid 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system

Background and Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Self-supervised learning-based diffeomorphic non-rigid motion estimation for fast motion-compensated coronary MR angiography

PURPOSE

To accelerate non-rigid motion corrected coronary MR angiography (CMRA) reconstruction by developing a deep learning based non-rigid motion estimation network and combining this with an efficient implementation of the undersampled motion corrected reconstruction.

METHODS

Undersampled and respiratory motion corrected CMRA with overall short scans of 5 to 10 min have been recently proposed. However, image reconstruction with this approach remains lengthy, since it relies on several non-rigid image registrations to estimate the respiratory motion and on a subsequent iterative optimization to correct for motion during the undersampled reconstruction. Here we introduce a self-supervised diffeomorphic non-rigid respiratory motion estimation network, DiRespME-net, to speed up respiratory motion estimation. We couple this with an efficient GPU-based implementation of the subsequent motion-corrected iterative reconstruction. DiRespME-net is based on a U-Net architecture, and is trained in a self-supervised fashion, with a loss enforcing image similarity and spatial smoothness of the motion fields. Motion predicted by DiRespME-net was used for GPU-based motion-corrected CMRA in 12 test subjects and final images were compared to those produced by state-of-the-art reconstruction. Vessel sharpness and visible length of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery were used as metrics of image quality for comparison.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in image quality was found between images reconstructed with the proposed approach (MC:DiRespME-net) and a motion-corrected reconstruction using cubic B-splines (MC:Nifty-reg). Visible vessel length was not significantly different between methods (RCA: MC:Nifty-reg 5.7 ± 1.7 cm vs MC:DiRespME-net 5.8 ± 1.7 cm, P = 0.32; LAD: MC:Nifty-reg 7.0 ± 2.6 cm vs MC:DiRespME-net 6.9 ± 2.7 cm, P = 0.81). Similarly, no statistically significant difference between methods was observed in terms of vessel sharpness (RCA: MC:Nifty-reg 60.3 ± 7.2% vs MC:DiRespME-net 61.0 ± 6.8%, P = 0.19; LAD: MC:Nifty-reg 57.4 ± 7.9% vs MC:DiRespME-net 58.1 ± 7.5%, P = 0.27). The proposed approach achieved a 50-fold reduction in computation time, resulting in a total reconstruction time of approximately 20 s.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed self-supervised learning-based motion corrected reconstruction enables fast motion-corrected CMRA image reconstruction, holding promise for integration in clinical routine.

Free-breathing 3D cardiac T1 mapping with transmit B1 correction at 3T

PURPOSE

To develop a cardiac T₁ mapping method for free-breathing 3D T₁ mapping of the whole heart at 3 T with transmit B₁ ( B 1 + ) correction.

METHODS

A free-breathing, electrocardiogram-gated inversion-recovery sequence with spoiled gradient-echo readout was developed and optimized for cardiac T₁ mapping at 3 T. High-frame-rate dynamic images were reconstructed from sparse (k,t)-space data acquired along a stack-of-stars trajectory using a subspace-based method for accelerated imaging. Joint T₁ and flip-angle estimation was performed in T₁ mapping to improve its robustness to B 1 + inhomogeneity. Subject-specific timing of data acquisition was used in the estimation to account for natural heart-rate variations during the imaging experiment.

RESULTS

Simulations showed that accuracy and precision of T₁ mapping can be improved with joint T₁ and flip-angle estimation and optimized electrocardiogram-gated spoiled gradient echo-based inversion-recovery acquisition scheme. The phantom study showed good agreement between the T₁ maps from the proposed method and the reference method. Three-dimensional cardiac T₁ maps (40 slices) were obtained at a 1.9-mm in-plane and 4.5-mm through-plane spatial resolution from healthy subjects (n = 6) with an average imaging time of 14.2 ± 1.6 minutes (heartbeat rate: 64.2 ± 7.1 bpm), showing myocardial T₁ values comparable to those obtained from modified Look-Locker inversion recovery. The proposed method generated B 1 + maps with spatially smooth variation showing 21%-32% and 11%-15% variations across the septal-lateral and inferior-anterior regions of the myocardium in the left ventricle.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method allows free-breathing 3D T₁ mapping of the whole heart with transmit B₁ correction in a practical imaging time.

Free-breathing simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T2∗ quantification in the myocardium

PURPOSE

To implement a free-breathing sequence for simultaneous quantification of T 1 , T 2 , and T 2 ∗ for comprehensive tissue characterization of the myocardium in a single scan using a multi-gradient-echo readout with saturation and T 2 preparation pulses.

METHODS

In the proposed Saturation And T 2 -prepared Relaxometry with Navigator-gating (SATURN) technique, a series of multi-gradient-echo (GRE) images with different magnetization preparations was acquired during free breathing. A total of 35 images were acquired in 26.5 ± 14.9 seconds using multiple saturation times and T 2 preparation durations and with imaging at 5 echo times. Bloch simulations and phantom experiments were used to validate a 5-parameter fit model for accurate relaxometry. Free-breathing simultaneous T 1 , T 2 , and T 2 ∗ measurements were performed in 10 healthy volunteers and 2 patients using SATURN at 3T and quantitatively compared to conventional single-parameter methods such as SASHA for T 1 , T 2 -prepared bSSFP, and multi-GRE for T 2 ∗ .

RESULTS

Simulations confirmed accurate fitting with the 5-parameter model. Phantom measurements showed good agreement with the reference methods in the relevant range for in vivo measurements. Compared to single-parameter methods comparable accuracy was achieved. SATURN produced in vivo parameter maps that were visually comparable to single-parameter methods. No significant difference between T 1 , T 2 , and T 2 ∗ times acquired with SATURN and single-parameter methods was shown in quantitative measurements (SATURN T 1 = 1573 ± 86 ms , T 2 = 33.2 ± 3.6 ms , T 2 ∗ = 25.3 ± 6.1 ms ; conventional methods: T 1 = 1544 ± 107 ms , T 2 = 33.2 ± 3.6 ms , T 2 ∗ = 23.8 ± 5.5 ms ; P > . 2 ) CONCLUSION: SATURN enables simultaneous quantification of T 1 , T 2 , and T 2 ∗ in the myocardium for comprehensive tissue characterization with co-registered maps, in a single scan with good agreement to single-parameter methods.

Magnetization-prepared GRASP MRI for rapid 3D T1 mapping and fat/water-separated T1 mapping

PURPOSE

This study aimed to (i) develop Magnetization-Prepared Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel (MP-GRASP) MRI using a stack-of-stars trajectory for rapid free-breathing T1 mapping and (ii) extend MP-GRASP to multi-echo acquisition (MP-Dixon-GRASP) for fat/water-separated (water-specific) T1 mapping.

METHODS

An adiabatic non-selective 180° inversion-recovery pulse was added to a gradient-echo-based golden-angle stack-of-stars sequence for magnetization-prepared 3D single-echo or 3D multi-echo acquisition. In combination with subspace-based GRASP-Pro reconstruction, the sequence allows for standard T1 mapping (MP-GRASP) or fat/water-separated T1 mapping (MP-Dixon-GRASP), respectively. The accuracy of T1 mapping using MP-GRASP was evaluated in a phantom and volunteers (brain and liver) against clinically accepted reference methods. The repeatability of T1 estimation was also assessed in the phantom and volunteers. The performance of MP-Dixon-GRASP for water-specific T1 mapping was evaluated in a fat/water phantom and volunteers (brain and liver).

RESULTS

ROI-based mean T1 values are correlated between the references and MP-GRASP in the phantom (R2 = 1.0), brain (R2 = 0.96), and liver (R2 = 0.73). MP-GRASP achieved good repeatability of T1 estimation in the phantom (R2 = 1.0), brain (R2 = 0.99), and liver (R2 = 0.82). Water-specific T1 is different from in-phase and out-of-phase composite T1 (composite T1 when fat and water signal are mixed in phase or out of phase) both in the phantom and volunteers.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrated the initial performance of MP-GRASP and MP-Dixon-GRASP MRI for rapid 3D T1 mapping and 3D fat/water-separated T1 mapping in the brain (without motion) and in the liver (during free breathing). With fat/water-separated T1 estimation, MP-Dixon-GRASP could be potentially useful for imaging patients with fatty-liver diseases.