1
|
Waks M, Lagore RL, Auerbach E, Grant A, Sadeghi-Tarakameh A, DelaBarre L, Jungst S, Tavaf N, Lattanzi R, Giannakopoulos I, Moeller S, Wu X, Yacoub E, Vizioli L, Schmidt S, Metzger GJ, Eryaman Y, Adriany G, Uğurbil K. RF coil design strategies for improving SNR at the ultrahigh magnetic field of 10.5 Tesla. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.23.595628. [PMID: 38826245 PMCID: PMC11142186 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.23.595628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To develop multichannel transmit and receive arrays towards capturing the ultimate-intrinsic-SNR (uiSNR) at 10.5 Tesla (T) and to demonstrate the feasibility and potential of whole-brain, high-resolution human brain imaging at this high field strength. Methods A dual row 16-channel self-decoupled transmit (Tx) array was converted to a 16Tx/Rx transceiver using custom transmit/receive switches. A 64-channel receive-only (64Rx) array was built to fit into the 16Tx/Rx array. Electromagnetic modeling and experiments were employed to define safe operation limits of the resulting 16Tx/80Rx array and obtain FDA approval for human use. Results The 64Rx array alone captured approximately 50% of the central uiSNR at 10.5T while the identical 7T 64Rx array captured ∼76% of uiSNR at this lower field strength. The 16Tx/80Rx configuration brought the fraction of uiSNR captured at 10.5T to levels comparable to the performance of the 64Rx array at 7T. SNR data obtained at the two field strengths with these arrays displayed dependent increases over a large central region. Whole-brain high resolution T 2 * and T 1 weighted anatomical and gradient-recalled echo EPI BOLD fMRI images were obtained at 10.5T for the first time with such an advanced array, illustrating the promise of >10T fields in studying the human brain. Conclusion We demonstrated the ability to approach the uiSNR at 10.5T over the human brain with a novel, high channel count array, achieving large SNR gains over 7T, currently the most commonly employed ultrahigh field platform, and demonstrate high resolution and high contrast anatomical and functional imaging at 10.5T.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang B, Radder J, Giannakopoulos I, Grant A, Lagore R, Waks M, Tavaf N, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G, Sadeghi-Tarakameh A, Eryaman Y, Lattanzi R, Uğurbil K. Performance of receive head arrays versus ultimate intrinsic SNR at 7 T and 10.5 T. Magn Reson Med 2024. [PMID: 38649922 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined magnetic field dependent SNR gains and ability to capture them with multichannel receive arrays for human head imaging in going from 7 T, the most commonly used ultrahigh magnetic field (UHF) platform at the present, to 10.5 T, which represents the emerging new frontier of >10 T in UHFs. METHODS Electromagnetic (EM) models of 31-channel and 63-channel multichannel arrays built for 10.5 T were developed for 10.5 T and 7 T simulations. A 7 T version of the 63-channel array with an identical coil layout was also built. Array performance was evaluated in the EM model using a phantom mimicking the size and electrical properties of the human head and a digital human head model. Experimental data was obtained at 7 T and 10.5 T with the 63-channel array. Ultimate intrinsic SNR (uiSNR) was calculated for the two field strengths using a voxelized cloud of dipoles enclosing the phantom or the digital human head model as a reference to assess the performance of the two arrays and field depended SNR gains. RESULTS uiSNR calculations in both the phantom and the digital human head model demonstrated SNR gains at 10.5 T relative to 7 T of 2.6 centrally, ˜2 at the location corresponding to the edge of the brain, ˜1.4 at the periphery. The EM models demonstrated that, centrally, both arrays captured ˜90% of the uiSNR at 7 T, but only ˜65% at 10.5 T, leading only to ˜2-fold gain in array SNR in going from 7 to 10.5 T. This trend was also observed experimentally with the 63-channel array capturing a larger fraction of the uiSNR at 7 T compared to 10.5 T, although the percentage of uiSNR captured were slightly lower at both field strengths compared to EM simulation results. CONCLUSIONS Major uiSNR gains are predicted for human head imaging in going from 7 T to 10.5 T, ranging from ˜2-fold at locations corresponding to the edge of the brain to 2.6-fold at the center, corresponding to approximately quadratic increase with the magnetic field. Realistic 31- and 63-channel receive arrays, however, approach the central uiSNR at 7 T, but fail to do so at 10.5 T, suggesting that more coils and/or different type of coils will be needed at 10.5 T and higher magnetic fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Zhang
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jerahmie Radder
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ilias Giannakopoulos
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R) and Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Grant
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Russell Lagore
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matt Waks
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nader Tavaf
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Gregor Adriany
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Yigitcan Eryaman
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Riccardo Lattanzi
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R) and Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kamil Uğurbil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boulant N, Le Ster C, Amadon A, Aubert G, Beckett A, Belorgey J, Bonnelye C, Bosch D, Brunner DO, Dilasser G, Dubois O, Ehses P, Feinberg D, Feizollah S, Gras V, Gross S, Guihard Q, Lannou H, Le Bihan D, Mauconduit F, Molinié F, Nunio F, Pruessmann K, Quettier L, Scheffler K, Stöcker T, Tardif C, Ugurbil K, Vignaud A, Vu A, Wu X. The possible influence of third-order shim coils on gradient-magnet interactions: an inter-field and inter-site study. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024; 37:169-183. [PMID: 38197908 PMCID: PMC10995016 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01138-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the possible influence of third-order shim coils on the behavior of the gradient field and in gradient-magnet interactions at 7 T and above. MATERIALS AND METHODS Gradient impulse response function measurements were performed at 5 sites spanning field strengths from 7 to 11.7 T, all of them sharing the same exact whole-body gradient coil design. Mechanical fixation and boundary conditions of the gradient coil were altered in several ways at one site to study the impact of mechanical coupling with the magnet on the field perturbations. Vibrations, power deposition in the He bath, and field dynamics were characterized at 11.7 T with the third-order shim coils connected and disconnected inside the Faraday cage. RESULTS For the same whole-body gradient coil design, all measurements differed greatly based on the third-order shim coil configuration (connected or not). Vibrations and gradient transfer function peaks could be affected by a factor of 2 or more, depending on the resonances. Disconnecting the third-order shim coils at 11.7 T also suppressed almost completely power deposition peaks at some frequencies. DISCUSSION Third-order shim coil configurations can have major impact in gradient-magnet interactions with consequences on potential hardware damage, magnet heating, and image quality going beyond EPI acquisitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Boulant
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France.
| | - Caroline Le Ster
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Alexis Amadon
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Guy Aubert
- CEA, Irfu, DACM, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | - Alexander Beckett
- Brain Imaging Center and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, CA, USA
| | - Jean Belorgey
- CEA, Irfu, DIS, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | - Cédric Bonnelye
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Dario Bosch
- Department for Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- High-Field MR Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Olivier Dubois
- CEA, Irfu, DIS, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | | | - David Feinberg
- Brain Imaging Center and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, CA, USA
| | - Sajjad Feizollah
- Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Vincent Gras
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | | | - Quentin Guihard
- CEA, Irfu, DIS, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | - Hervé Lannou
- CEA, Irfu, DACM, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | - Denis Le Bihan
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Franck Mauconduit
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | | | - François Nunio
- CEA, Irfu, DIS, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | | | - Lionel Quettier
- CEA, Irfu, DACM, University Paris-Saclay, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | - Klaus Scheffler
- Department for Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- High-Field MR Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tony Stöcker
- Center for Neurogenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christine Tardif
- Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kamil Ugurbil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alexandre Vignaud
- CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, University Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | - An Vu
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Xiaoping Wu
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gapais PF, Luong M, Nizery F, Maitre G, Giacomini E, Guillot J, Vignaud A, Berrahou D, Dubois M, Abdeddaim R, Georget E, Hosseinnezhadian S, Amadon A. Efficiently building receive arrays with electromagnetic simulations and additive manufacturing: A two-layer, 32-channel prototype for 7T brain MRI. Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:1254-1267. [PMID: 37986237 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We propose a comprehensive workflow to design and build fully customized dense receive arrays for MRI, providing prediction of SNR and g-factor. Combined with additive manufacturing, this method allows an efficient implementation for any arbitrary loop configuration. To demonstrate the methodology, an innovative two-layer, 32-channel receive array is proposed. METHODS The design workflow is based on numerical simulations using a commercial 3D electromagnetic software associated with circuit model co-simulations to provide the most accurate results in an efficient time. A model to compute the noise covariance matrix from circuit model scattering parameters is proposed. A 32-channel receive array at 7 T is simulated and fabricated with a two-layer design made of non-geometrically decoupled loops. Decoupling between loops is achieved using home-built direct high-impedance preamplifiers. The loops are 3D-printed with a new additive manufacturing technique to speed up integration while preserving the detailed geometry as simulated. The SNR and parallel-imaging performances of the proposed design are compared with a commercial coil, and in vivo images are acquired. RESULTS The comparison of SNR and g-factors showed a good agreement between simulations and measurements. Experimental values are comparable with the ones measured on the commercial coil. Preliminary in vivo images also ensured the absence of any unexpected artifacts. CONCLUSION A new design and performance analysis workflow is proposed and tested with a non-conventional 32-channel prototype at 7 T. Additive manufacturing of dense arrays of loops for brain imaging at ultrahigh field is validated for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul-François Gapais
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Joliot, NeuroSpin, BAOBAB, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Multiwave Imaging SAS, Marseille, France
| | - Michel Luong
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Irfu, DACM, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - François Nizery
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Irfu, LCAP, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Gabriel Maitre
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Irfu, LCAP, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Eric Giacomini
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Joliot, NeuroSpin, BAOBAB, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Jules Guillot
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Joliot, NeuroSpin, BAOBAB, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Alexandre Vignaud
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Joliot, NeuroSpin, BAOBAB, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | | | | | - Redha Abdeddaim
- Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Alexis Amadon
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Joliot, NeuroSpin, BAOBAB, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feinberg DA, Beckett AJS, Vu AT, Stockmann J, Huber L, Ma S, Ahn S, Setsompop K, Cao X, Park S, Liu C, Wald LL, Polimeni JR, Mareyam A, Gruber B, Stirnberg R, Liao C, Yacoub E, Davids M, Bell P, Rummert E, Koehler M, Potthast A, Gonzalez-Insua I, Stocker S, Gunamony S, Dietz P. Next-generation MRI scanner designed for ultra-high-resolution human brain imaging at 7 Tesla. Nat Methods 2023; 20:2048-2057. [PMID: 38012321 PMCID: PMC10703687 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-02068-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
To increase granularity in human neuroimaging science, we designed and built a next-generation 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner to reach ultra-high resolution by implementing several advances in hardware. To improve spatial encoding and increase the image signal-to-noise ratio, we developed a head-only asymmetric gradient coil (200 mT m-1, 900 T m-1s-1) with an additional third layer of windings. We integrated a 128-channel receiver system with 64- and 96-channel receiver coil arrays to boost signal in the cerebral cortex while reducing g-factor noise to enable higher accelerations. A 16-channel transmit system reduced power deposition and improved image uniformity. The scanner routinely performs functional imaging studies at 0.35-0.45 mm isotropic spatial resolution to reveal cortical layer functional activity, achieves high angular resolution in diffusion imaging and reduces acquisition time for both functional and structural imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Feinberg
- Erwin Hahn 7T MRI Laboratory, Henry H. Wheeler Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
- Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, CA, USA.
| | - Alexander J S Beckett
- Erwin Hahn 7T MRI Laboratory, Henry H. Wheeler Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, CA, USA
| | - An T Vu
- Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco Veteran Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jason Stockmann
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Laurentius Huber
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Kawin Setsompop
- Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xiaozhi Cao
- Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Suhyung Park
- Erwin Hahn 7T MRI Laboratory, Henry H. Wheeler Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
- Department of ICT Convergence System Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Chunlei Liu
- Erwin Hahn 7T MRI Laboratory, Henry H. Wheeler Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan R Polimeni
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Azma Mareyam
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Bernhard Gruber
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- BARNLabs, Muenzkirchen, Austria
| | | | - Congyu Liao
- Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mathias Davids
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Bell
- Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shajan Gunamony
- Imaging Centre of Excellence, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- MR CoilTech Limited, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ivanov D, De Martino F, Formisano E, Fritz FJ, Goebel R, Huber L, Kashyap S, Kemper VG, Kurban D, Roebroeck A, Sengupta S, Sorger B, Tse DHY, Uludağ K, Wiggins CJ, Poser BA. Magnetic resonance imaging at 9.4 T: the Maastricht journey. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:159-173. [PMID: 37081247 PMCID: PMC10140139 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01080-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
The 9.4 T scanner in Maastricht is a whole-body magnet with head gradients and parallel RF transmit capability. At the time of the design, it was conceptualized to be one of the best fMRI scanners in the world, but it has also been used for anatomical and diffusion imaging. 9.4 T offers increases in sensitivity and contrast, but the technical ultra-high field (UHF) challenges, such as field inhomogeneities and constraints set by RF power deposition, are exacerbated compared to 7 T. This article reviews some of the 9.4 T work done in Maastricht. Functional imaging experiments included blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) and blood-volume weighted (VASO) fMRI using different readouts. BOLD benefits from shorter T2* at 9.4 T while VASO from longer T1. We show examples of both ex vivo and in vivo anatomical imaging. For many applications, pTx and optimized coils are essential to harness the full potential of 9.4 T. Our experience shows that, while considerable effort was required compared to our 7 T scanner, we could obtain high-quality anatomical and functional data, which illustrates the potential of MR acquisitions at even higher field strengths. The practical challenges of working with a relatively unique system are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimo Ivanov
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Federico De Martino
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elia Formisano
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Francisco J Fritz
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Goebel
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurentius Huber
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sriranga Kashyap
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Valentin G Kemper
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Denizhan Kurban
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alard Roebroeck
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bettina Sorger
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Desmond H Y Tse
- Scannexus BV, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 EV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kâmil Uludağ
- Krembil Brain Institute, Koerner Scientist in MR Imaging, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Christopher J Wiggins
- Imaging Core Facility (INM-ICF), Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - Benedikt A Poser
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmidt R, Keban E, Bollmann S, Wiggins CJ, Niendorf T. Scaling the mountains: what lies above 7 Tesla magnetic resonance? MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:151-157. [PMID: 37072540 PMCID: PMC10140119 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01087-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Schmidt
- Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Elena Keban
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Saskia Bollmann
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christopher J Wiggins
- Imaging Core Facility, Institute for Neurology and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Julich, Julich, Germany
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max-Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bates S, Dumoulin SO, Folkers PJM, Formisano E, Goebel R, Haghnejad A, Helmich RC, Klomp D, van der Kolk AG, Li Y, Nederveen A, Norris DG, Petridou N, Roell S, Scheenen TWJ, Schoonheim MM, Voogt I, Webb A. A vision of 14 T MR for fundamental and clinical science. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:211-225. [PMID: 37036574 PMCID: PMC10088620 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01081-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We outline our vision for a 14 Tesla MR system. This comprises a novel whole-body magnet design utilizing high temperature superconductor; a console and associated electronic equipment; an optimized radiofrequency coil setup for proton measurement in the brain, which also has a local shim capability; and a high-performance gradient set. RESEARCH FIELDS The 14 Tesla system can be considered a 'mesocope': a device capable of measuring on biologically relevant scales. In neuroscience the increased spatial resolution will anatomically resolve all layers of the cortex, cerebellum, subcortical structures, and inner nuclei. Spectroscopic imaging will simultaneously measure excitatory and inhibitory activity, characterizing the excitation/inhibition balance of neural circuits. In medical research (including brain disorders) we will visualize fine-grained patterns of structural abnormalities and relate these changes to functional and molecular changes. The significantly increased spectral resolution will make it possible to detect (dynamic changes in) individual metabolites associated with pathological pathways including molecular interactions and dynamic disease processes. CONCLUSIONS The 14 Tesla system will offer new perspectives in neuroscience and fundamental research. We anticipate that this initiative will usher in a new era of ultra-high-field MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Bates
- Tesla Engineering Ltd., Water Lane, Storrington, West Sussex, RH20 3EA, UK
| | - Serge O Dumoulin
- Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Computational Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elia Formisano
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rainer Goebel
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick C Helmich
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Klomp
- Radiology Department, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anja G van der Kolk
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yi Li
- Independent Researcher, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Aart Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David G Norris
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Zollverein, Kokereiallee 7, Building C84, 45141, Essen, Germany.
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (CNPH), Faculty Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Natalia Petridou
- Radiology Department, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Roell
- Neoscan Solutions GmbH, Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Str. 6, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Tom W J Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Menno M Schoonheim
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingmar Voogt
- Wavetronica, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Webb
- Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Centre, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ladd ME, Quick HH, Speck O, Bock M, Doerfler A, Forsting M, Hennig J, Ittermann B, Möller HE, Nagel AM, Niendorf T, Remy S, Schaeffter T, Scheffler K, Schlemmer HP, Schmitter S, Schreiber L, Shah NJ, Stöcker T, Uder M, Villringer A, Weiskopf N, Zaiss M, Zaitsev M. Germany's journey toward 14 Tesla human magnetic resonance. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:191-210. [PMID: 37029886 PMCID: PMC10140098 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sites within Germany operate human MRI systems with magnetic fields either at 7 Tesla or 9.4 Tesla. In 2013, these sites formed a network to facilitate and harmonize the research being conducted at the different sites and make this technology available to a larger community of researchers and clinicians not only within Germany, but also worldwide. The German Ultrahigh Field Imaging (GUFI) network has defined a strategic goal to establish a 14 Tesla whole-body human MRI system as a national research resource in Germany as the next progression in magnetic field strength. This paper summarizes the history of this initiative, the current status, the motivation for pursuing MR imaging and spectroscopy at such a high magnetic field strength, and the technical and funding challenges involved. It focuses on the scientific and science policy process from the perspective in Germany, and is not intended to be a comprehensive systematic review of the benefits and technical challenges of higher field strengths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Ladd
- Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Harald H Quick
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Speck
- Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Behavioural Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany
- Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arnd Doerfler
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Forsting
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hennig
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Ittermann
- Medical Physics and Metrological Information Technology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Harald E Möller
- Methods and Development Group Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Armin M Nagel
- Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Remy
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Schaeffter
- Medical Physics and Metrological Information Technology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Scheffler
- Magnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Schmitter
- Medical Physics and Metrological Information Technology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Schreiber
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - N Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Tony Stöcker
- MR Physics, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arno Villringer
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Moritz Zaiss
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maxim Zaitsev
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nurzed B, Kuehne A, Aigner CS, Schmitter S, Niendorf T, Eigentler TW. Radiofrequency antenna concepts for human cardiac MR at 14.0 T. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:257-277. [PMID: 36920549 PMCID: PMC10140016 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01075-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the feasibility of human cardiac MR (CMR) at 14.0 T using high-density radiofrequency (RF) dipole transceiver arrays in conjunction with static and dynamic parallel transmission (pTx). MATERIALS AND METHODS RF arrays comprised of self-grounded bow-tie (SGBT) antennas, bow-tie (BT) antennas, or fractionated dipole (FD) antennas were used in this simulation study. Static and dynamic pTx were applied to enhance transmission field (B1+) uniformity and efficiency in the heart of the human voxel model. B1+ distribution and maximum specific absorption rate averaged over 10 g tissue (SAR10g) were examined at 7.0 T and 14.0 T. RESULTS At 14.0 T static pTx revealed a minimum B1+ROI efficiency of 0.91 μT/√kW (SGBT), 0.73 μT/√kW (BT), and 0.56 μT/√kW (FD) and maximum SAR10g of 4.24 W/kg, 1.45 W/kg, and 2.04 W/kg. Dynamic pTx with 8 kT points indicate a balance between B1+ROI homogeneity (coefficient of variation < 14%) and efficiency (minimum B1+ROI > 1.11 µT/√kW) at 14.0 T with a maximum SAR10g < 5.25 W/kg. DISCUSSION MRI of the human heart at 14.0 T is feasible from an electrodynamic and theoretical standpoint, provided that multi-channel high-density antennas are arranged accordingly. These findings provide a technical foundation for further explorations into CMR at 14.0 T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilguun Nurzed
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Robert Rössle Strasse 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Robert Rössle Strasse 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
- MRI.TOOLS GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Thomas Wilhelm Eigentler
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Robert Rössle Strasse 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- Chair of Medical Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boulant N, Quettier L. Commissioning of the Iseult CEA 11.7 T whole-body MRI: current status, gradient-magnet interaction tests and first imaging experience. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:175-189. [PMID: 36715884 PMCID: PMC10140097 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01063-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Iseult MRI is an actively shielded whole-body magnet providing a homogeneous and stable magnetic field of 11.7 T. After nearly 20 years of research and development, the magnet successfully reached its target field strength for the first time in 2019. This article reviews its commissioning status, the gradient-magnet interaction test results and first imaging experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS Vibration, acoustics, power deposition in the He bath, and field monitoring measurements were carried out. Magnet safety system was tested against outer magnetic perturbations, and calibrated to define a safe operation of the gradient coil. First measurements using parallel transmission were also performed on an ex-vivo brain to mitigate the RF field inhomogeneity effect. RESULTS Acoustics measurements show promising results with sound pressure levels slightly above the enforced limits only at certain frequency intervals. Vibrations of the gradient coil revealed a linear trend with the B0 field only in the worst case. Field monitoring revealed some resonances at some frequencies that are still under investigation. DISCUSSION Gradient-magnet interaction tests at up to 11.7 T are concluded. The scanner is now kept permanently at field and the final calibrations are on-going to pave the road towards the first acquisitions on volunteers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Boulant
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, Gif Sur Yvette, France.
| | - Lionel Quettier
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Irfu, Département des Accélérateurs, de la Cryogénie et du Magnétisme, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harrevelt SD, Roos THM, Klomp DWJ, Steensma BR, Raaijmakers AJE. Simulation-based evaluation of SAR and flip angle homogeneity for five transmit head arrays at 14 T. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:245-255. [PMID: 37000320 PMCID: PMC10140109 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01067-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various research sites are pursuing 14 T MRI systems. However, both local SAR and RF transmit field inhomogeneity will increase. The aim of this simulation study is to investigate the trade-offs between peak local SAR and flip angle uniformity for five transmit coil array designs at 14 T in comparison to 7 T. METHODS Investigated coil array designs are: 8 dipole antennas (8D), 16 dipole antennas (16D), 8 loop coils (8D), 16 loop coils (16L), 8 dipoles/8 loop coils (8D8L) and for reference 8 dipoles at 7 T. Both RF shimming and kT-points were investigated by plotting L-curves of peak SAR levels vs flip angle homogeneity. RESULTS For RF shimming, the 16L array performs best. For kT-points, superior flip angle homogeneity is achieved at the expense of more power deposition, and the dipole arrays outperform the loop coil arrays. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION For most arrays and regular imaging, the constraint on head SAR is reached before constraints on peak local SAR are violated. Furthermore, the different drive vectors in kT-points alleviate strong peaks in local SAR. Flip angle inhomogeneity can be alleviated by kT-points at the expense of larger power deposition. For kT-points, the dipole arrays seem to outperform loop coil arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seb D Harrevelt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Thomas H M Roos
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis W J Klomp
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart R Steensma
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander J E Raaijmakers
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|