Bochum ultrasound score versus clinical and electrophysiological parameters in distinguishing acute-onset chronic from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

Differentiation of Critical Illness Myopathy and Critical Illness Neuropathy Using Nerve Ultrasonography

PURPOSE

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness occurs frequently in intensive care unit patients, including critical illness myopathy (CIM) and critical illness polyneuropathy (CIPN). The authors present a prospective study to assess the ultrasound pattern sum score to differentiate between confirmed CIM, sensory neuropathy, and CIPN cases.

METHODS

Cross-sectional areas of 12 predefined nerve segments in 16 patients were sonographically examined. Single-nerve cross-sectional areas and ultrasound pattern sum score values were compared; results are given as P -values and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In neuropathy, significant single-nerve cross-sectional area enlargement was observed in the median ( P = 0.04), ulnar ( P = 0.04), and fibular nerves ( P = 0.0003). The ultrasound pattern sum score could reliably differentiate between pure CIM and neuropathy ( P = 0.0002, AUC 0.92), CIM and sensory neuropathy ( P = 0.001, AUC 0.88), and CIM and CIPN ( P = 0.007, AUC 0.92), but not between sensory neuropathy and CIPN ( P = 0.599, AUC 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve ultrasonography reliably identifies neuropathy in intensive care unit-acquired weakness, yet cannot differentiate between sensory neuropathy and CIPN. A standardized ultrasound algorithm can serve as a fast bedside test for the presence of neuropathy in intensive care unit-acquired weakness.

Autonomic nervous system involvement in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although dysautonomia is a well-recognized complication of acute demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, it is rarely reported and evaluated in chronic demyelinating neuropathies. The purpose of this review is to search and synthesize the current literature on the prevalence and type of autonomic dysfunction (AD) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting AD in CIDP.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, including 346 patients with CIDP, were found eligible for the review. Seven studies used autonomic tests only as an additional component of the comprehensive clinical evaluation, and found that dysautonomia in CIDP may indicate the presence of a comorbid disease (e.g., diabetes) and facilitate the differentiation of CIDP from other neuropathies (e.g., amyloid neuropathy). Five studies performed quantitative assessment of autonomic function in CIDP as a primary goal. Two studies have used the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) to assess severity and distribution of dysautonomia. The reported prevalence of dysautonomia in CIDP during quantitative assessment of autonomic function ranged from 25 to 89%, depending on the battery of tests used, with CASS not exceeding 4 points. The abnormalities in autonomic tests indicated both sympathetic and parasympathetic dysfunction and did not correlate with the duration, severity and variant of CIDP.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical or subclinical involvement of the ANS has been shown to be common and relatively mild in CIDP. The impact of autonomic impairment on disability and of its possible response to therapy in CIDP needs to be further investigated.

Emerging biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in Guillain-Barré syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated poly(radiculo)neuropathy with a variable clinical outcome. Identifying patients who are at risk of suffering from long-term disabilities is a great challenge. Biomarkers are useful to confirm diagnosis, monitor disease progression, and predict outcome.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide an overview of the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for GBS, which are useful for establishing early treatment strategies and follow-up care plans.

EXPERT OPINION

Detecting patients at risk of developing a severe outcome may improve management of disease progression and limit potential complications. Several clinical factors are associated with poor prognosis: higher age, presence of diarrhea within 4 weeks of symptom onset, rapid and severe weakness progression, dysautonomia, decreased vital capacity and facial, bulbar, and neck weakness. Biological, neurophysiological and imaging measures of unfavorable outcome include multiple anti-ganglioside antibodies elevation, increased serum and CSF neurofilaments light (NfL) and heavy chain, decreased NfL CSF/serum ratio, hypoalbuminemia, nerve conduction study with early signs of demyelination or axonal loss and enlargement of nerve cross-sectional area on ultrasound. Depicting prognostic biomarkers aims at predicting short-term mortality and need for cardio-pulmonary support, long-term patient functional outcome, guiding treatment decisions and monitoring therapeutic responses in future clinical trials.

The normal value and influencing factors of shear wave elastography in healthy tibial nerves: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Shear wave elastography is a potential method for evaluating peripheral neuropathy, but lacking reference values. The aim of this study was to measure tibial nerve stiffness in healthy individuals using shear wave elastography and to investigate the influencing factors of tibial nerve stiffness.

Methods

Shear wave elastography of bilateral tibial nerves was performed in 50 healthy individuals 4 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. Mean shear modulus data of tibial nerves were obtained and recorded. Intra- and interobserver agreement were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Differences among groups (grouped by laterality, sex, age, and body mass index) were analyzed with independent-samples t-tests and paired t-tests. Effect size (Cohen's d) was also calculated.

Results

The intra-and interobserver agreement were moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.700-0.747) for all participants, and was poor (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.265-0.088) in very thin people (body mass index <18.5 kg/m²). The shear wave elastography measurements of the tibial nerve did not show a significant difference between legs, sexes, or different age groups. Higher values of tibial nerve stiffness were found in thinner participants.

Conclusions

Shear wave elastography is a method to evaluate the stiffness of peripheral nerves. The measurement results were likely influenced by body mass index of the participants.

Nerve Ultrasound Score in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Background and Objectives: Studies have suggested that, by applying certain nerve ultrasound scores, demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathies can be differentiated. In the current study, we investigated the utility of ultrasound pattern sub-score A (UPSA) and intra- and internerve cross-sectional area (CSA) variability in the diagnostic evaluation of demyelinating neuropathies. Materials and Methods: Nerve ultrasound was performed in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and compared to patients with axonal neuropathies. The UPSA, i.e., the sum of ultrasound scores at eight predefined measurement points in the median (forearm, elbow and mid-arm), ulnar (forearm and mid-arm), tibial (popliteal fossa and ankle) and fibular (lateral popliteal fossa) nerves, was applied. Intra- and internerve CSA variability were defined as maximal CSA/minimal CSA for each nerve and each subject, respectively. Results: A total of 34 CIDP, 15 AIDP and 16 axonal neuropathies (including eight axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), four hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis, three diabetic polyneuropathy and one vasculitic neuropathy) were included. A total of 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for comparison. Significantly enlarged nerve CSA was observed in CIDP and AIDP with significantly higher UPSA in CIDP compared to the other groups (9.9 ± 2.9 vs. 5.9 ± 2.0 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9 in AIDP vs. axonal neuropathies, p < 0.001). A total of 89.3% of the patients with CIDP had an UPSA score ≥7 compared to the patients with AIDP (33.3%) and axonal neuropathies (25.0%) (p < 0.001). Using this cut-off, the performance of UPSA in differentiating CIDP from other neuropathies including AIDP was excellent (area under the curve of 0.943) with high sensitivity (89.3%), specificity (85.2%) and positive predictive value (73.5%). There were no significant differences in intra- and internerve CSA variability between the three groups. Conclusion: The UPSA ultrasound score was useful in distinguishing CIDP from other neuropathies compared to nerve CSA alone.

Fast-Acting Sub-perception Spinal Cord Stimulation for a Case of Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy. Just an Antalgic Treatment or Even a Therapy?

Introduction

Painful diabetic polyneuropathy (P-DPN) occurs in 20% - 30% of diabetic patients. Currently, therapeutic strategies include lifestyle modifications, good glycemic control, and neuropathic pain drugs. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be successful in patients who have not responded to other treatments. The American Diabetes Association strongly recommends early screening and diagnosis for this condition through clinical tests and nerve conduction study (NCS). In recent years, high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) with the analysis of cross-sectional area (CSA) has shown an increasingly important role in detecting changes in the nervous structures, blood vessels, echo, and mobility of the nerve. Cross-sectional area is frequently enlarged in these patients, even those with normal NCS. We aimed to use SCS with fast-acting sub-perception therapy (FAST) modality to treat P-DPN. We also evaluated the CSA of the involved nerves before and after treatment.

Case Presentation

A 58-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital in 2020 (Civitavecchia, Italy). She suffered from P-DPN for 3 years and did not respond to conventional medical treatments. Preoperative electromyography (EMG) was negative for radiculopathy, while electroneurography (ENG) showed a reduction in sensory conduction velocity (SCV) in the sural nerve (SN) bilaterally. Clinical tests on perceived pain and quality of life showed high severity. The report was confirmed by HRUS with enlargement of the CSA of the posterior tibial nerve (PTN), external popliteal nerve (EPN), and SN. The patient was successfully subjected to all-in-one SCS implantation in the FAST modality. She obtained immediate pain relief that remained unaltered at the 3-month follow-up. The patient completely discontinued drug therapy. One month after implantation, ENG highlighted an increased SN SCV, and the HRUS of PTN EPN and SN showed a significant reduction in CSA in all 3 nerves involved.

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial in improving the clinical outcome of P-DPN, but there is still no gold standard therapy. Spinal cord stimulation in the new FAST modality was effective in this clinical case. The pain relief was supported by a significant reduction in the CSA of the studied nerves observed on HRUS 1 month after SCS implantation. The results and the improvement of a pathological nervous pattern, albeit with a short follow-up of only 3 months, could suggest not only a symptomatic but perhaps also a therapeutic role of SCS in P-DPN.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with an acute onset. Clinical case

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a heterogeneous treatable dysimmune neuropathy. The variety of clinical forms and course of the disease can be challenging for proper diagnosis and early treatment. In a quarter of cases CIDP starts acutely, mimicking GuillainBarr syndrome. The early diagnosis is especially important regarding differences in treatment and prognosis of these conditions. In this article, we present a clinical case of acute onset CIDP with a detailed analysis of the differential diagnosis between acute and chronic immune-mediated neuropathies.

Nerve Ultrasound Distinguishes Non-Inflammatory Axonal Polyneuropathy From Inflammatory Polyneuropathy With Secondary Axonal Damage

Introduction

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) may have a similar clinical and electrophysiological presentation to non-inflammatory axonal polyneuropathies (NIAPs) when secondary axonal damage occurs. We aimed to investigate if nerve ultrasound can help to differentiate CIDP with additional secondary axonal damage from NIAP.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves measured by ultrasound at six suitable nerve sites was compared in 95 patients with CIDP and 82 patients with NIAP. We developed the adjusted Bochum ultrasound score (aBUS) ranging from 0 to 6 resulting from the number of sites with enlarged CSA (median, ulnar, radial, and sural nerve).

Results

The mean CSA of patients with CIDP was enlarged at all six nerve sites compared with the mean CSA of patients with NIAP. A total of 21 patients with CIDP did not meet 2010 electrophysiological diagnostic criteria (European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline, EFNS/PNS criteria) for CIDP at examination timepoint but only in further follow-up, while 25 patients with NIAP fulfilled electrophysiological EFNS/PNS criteria for CIDP as “possible” or “probable” CIDP. To increase diagnostic power, we included aBUS measured by ultrasound in patients classified as “possible” or “probable” resulting in an improved specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 59%, compared to a specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria alone of 60% and sensitivity of 78%.

Conclusion

Using nerve ultrasound and the aBUS as a complementary method to distinguish CIDP from NIAP in case of secondary axonal damage can facilitate the diagnosis of CIDP.

Application of High-Resolution Ultrasound on Diagnosing Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The typical manifestation is a length-dependent "glove and sock" sensation. At present, diagnosis is mainly dependent on clinical manifestations. Since the pathogenesis is not clear, there are no effective treatment measures. Management consists mainly of glucose control, peripheral nerve nutrition, and other measures to delay the progress of the disease; early diagnosis is therefore crucial to improving prognosis and quality of life for patients with DPN. Due to the lack of obvious symptoms in 50% of patients and the low sensitivity of neuro-electrophysiology to small fibers, the missed diagnosis rate is high. High-resolution ultrasound (HRU), as a convenient noninvasive tool, has been proven by many studies to have excellent clinical value in diagnosing DPN. With the development of related new technology, HRU shows promise for the screening, diagnosing, and follow-up of DPN, which could serve as a biomarker and provide new diagnostic insights. In this paper, we review the ability of HRU to detect nerve cross-sectional area and blood flow, and echo and other image changes, and in showing the characteristics of peripheral nerve morphological changes in patients with DPN. We also explore the application of two other recent technological developments-shear wave elastography (SWE) and ultrasound scoring systems-in improving the diagnostic efficiency of HRU in peripheral neuropathy.

Gold Standard for Diagnosis of DPN

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus. It often causes symmetrical paresthesia, loss of sensation, and hyperalgesia. Without early intervention, it might lead to diabetic foot ulceration, gangrene, and subsequent amputation in people with diabetes. DPN is an insidious disease and often underdiagnosed. This paper reviews the current national and international prevalence of DPN, screening methods for early DPN, including quantitative sensory measurement, neurological function scoring system, confocal microscopy, and high-frequency ultrasound, and summarizes the related research progress, clinical application, and development prospects of these methods in recent years.

Current and future applications of ultrasound imaging in peripheral nerve disorders

Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) is a rapidly evolving technique used in neuromuscular medicine to provide complimentary information to standard electrodiagnostic studies. NMUS provides a dynamic, real time assessment of anatomy which can alter both diagnostic and management pathways in peripheral nerve disorders. This review describes the current and future techniques used in NMUS and details the applications and developments in the diagnosis and monitoring of compressive, hereditary, immune-mediated and axonal peripheral nerve disorders, and motor neuron diseases. Technological advances have allowed the increased utilisation of ultrasound for management of peripheral nerve disorders; however, several practical considerations need to be taken into account to facilitate the widespread uptake of this technique.

Neuromuscular ultrasound in clinical practice: A review

Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) is becoming a standard element in the evaluation of peripheral nerve and muscle disease. When obtained simultaneously to electrodiagnostic studies, it provides dynamic, structural information that can refine a diagnosis or identify a structural etiology. NMUS can improve patient care for those with mononeuropathies, polyneuropathy, motor neuron disease and muscle disorders. In this article, we present a practical guide to the basics of NMUS and its clinical application. Basic ultrasound physics, scanning techniques and clinical applications are reviewed, along with current challenges.

Differentiation Between Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Acute-Onset Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuritis-a Prospective Follow-up Study Using Ultrasound and Neurophysiological Measurements

Differentiation of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuritis (CIDP) might be intricate in early stages. We compared electrodiagnostics (EDx) and nerve ultrasound (NUS) as tools for early distinction and follow-up. NUS and EDx have been performed at first visitation and after 6 months. The nerve conduction study score (NCSS), the ultrasound pattern sum score (UPSS), and clinical scores were used for comparison. Compared with the 33 GBS patients, the 34 CIDP patients (50% with symptoms < 4 weeks) revealed significant nerve enlargement in ultrasound (p < 0.001) except for the roots and vagus, which exhibited increased values in both groups. EDx has no significant differences between both groups except for the A-wave frequency and the sural sparing pattern, which is more frequent in GBS (Fisher's exact p < 0.05). In the latter, particularly, pure sensory nerves were not enlarged in contrast to CIDP, in which those were mostly enlarged (p < 0.001). This ultrasonic sensory sparing pattern (uSSP) in combination with enlarged roots/vagus is the hallmark finding in GBS with sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value > 85%, whereas in CIDP, enlarged sensory und multifocally enlarged sensorimotor nerves are key differentiation features to GBS. Increased echointensity of the nerves further arises only in CIDP. After 6 months, in CIDP, the significant nerve enlargement persisted, whereas in GBS, all segments almost normalized. Clinical, ultrasonic, and NCS scores correlated significantly over the time. Enlarged roots/vagus in combination with uSSP might facilitate differentiation of GBS and CIDP in the early stage, and ultrasonic 6-month normalization underlines the diagnosis of GBS in cases of uncertainty. Trial Registration: DRKS-ID 00005253.

Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Background:

One of the main goals of novel, noninvasive imaging techniques like high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is the prediction of treatment response for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

Methods:

A total of 17 patients with CIDP were examined prospectively at baseline and every 9 months over a period of 18 months using CCM to quantify corneal nerve degeneration markers and immune cell infiltration as well as HRUS to detect changes of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves. Additionally, skin biopsy of the distal and proximal leg as well as quantitative sensory testing were performed at the first follow-up visit.

Results:

A value of more than 30 total corneal cells/mm² in CCM at baseline identified patients with clinical progression with a sensitivity/specificity of 100% in our cohort. Corneal nerve fiber density and length remained low and stable over the study period and intra-epidermal fiber density was markedly reduced in the majority of the patients. Furthermore, an increase in Bochum ultrasound score (BUS), which summarizes the CSA of the ulnar nerve in Guyons’ canal, the ulnar nerve in the upper arm, the radial nerve in the spiral groove and the sural nerve between the gastrocnemius muscle, and a maximum BUS of 4 at study initiation identified patients with disease progression (sensitivity 80%, specificity 88%).

Conclusions:

BUS and corneal total cell infiltration seem to represent early markers for clinical progression in CIDP, thus having the potential to identify at-risk patients and impact treatment decisions.

Ultrasound of peripheral nerves in neuralgic amyotrophy

INTRODUCTION

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) can often be difficult to diagnose. Nerve ultrasound (US) is potentially useful, but it is operator-dependent, especially for small nerves.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with NA (mean duration 16 months) and 50 control subjects underwent US of the brachial plexus and major nerves of the upper extremity at predefined sites. We compared cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of affected and unaffected sides with controls and sides within patients.

RESULTS

The median nerve and radial nerve at the level of the upper arm were enlarged on the affected sides compared with controls and the unaffected sides of patients. Enlargement was most pronounced for affected sides vs. controls (median 44%, radial 67%).

DISCUSSION

NA patients showed increased CSAs, especially in the major nerves of the upper limb, even after longer disease duration. This could make US a useful adjunct in diagnosing NA. Muscle Nerve 59:55-59, 2019.

Clinical, Sonographic, and Electrophysiologic Longitudinal Features of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several studies have aimed to find potential biomarkers to simplify the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and to monitor and predict the disease course. However, reliable markers are still lacking. We aimed to investigate whether high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) is suitable for monitoring the long-term clinical course of CIDP.

METHODS

Twenty patients fulfilling the definite diagnostic criteria of CIDP received clinical examination, evaluation of the INCAT (inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment) overall disability sum score (ODSS) as well as nerve conduction studies, and HRUS every 6 months over a median follow-up time of 34 months. Patients were divided into clinically stable/regressive disease course or progressive disease course according to the development of the ODSS.

RESULTS

The intranerve cross-sectional-area (CSA) variability of the nerves of the lower extremity increased with disease progression, whereas it remained unchanged in patients with a stable or remitting disease course.

CONCLUSION

Nerve ultrasound can be used as a method to objectify the long-term disease course in CIDP patients. The intranerve CSA variability is suitable for monitoring the clinical course of patients with CIDP.

Diagnostic insights into chronic-inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare immune-mediated neuropathy with demyelination of nerve fibers as leading morphological feature. The course of disease can be chronic progressive or remitting relapsing. Whereas for acute immune-mediated neuropathies several serological markers have been identified and used successfully in clinical routine, the serological diagnosis of chronic variants such as CIDP has not yet been evolved satisfactory. The typical CIDP and its various atypical variants are characterized by a certain diversity of clinical phenotype and response to treatment. Thus, diagnostic markers could aid in the differential diagnosis of CIDP variants and stratification of patients for a better treatment response. Most patients respond well to a causal therapy including steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis. Apart from electrophysiological and morphological markers, several autoantibodies have been reported as candidate markers for CIDP, including antibodies against glycolipids or paranodal/nodal molecules. The present review provides a summary of the progress in autoantibody testing in CIDP and its possible implication on the stratification of the CIDP variants and treatment response.

High-Resolution Nerve Ultrasound and Electrophysiological Findings in Restless Legs Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a multifactorial network disorder of a sensorimotor system extending from dopaminergic and glutamatergic cerebral structures to the spinal neurons and peripheral nerves. The role of peripheral nerve damage in the causality and severity progression for RLS patients remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a clinical and epidemiological study on a cohort of 34 RLS patients focusing on RLS risk factors and disease severity. We investigated the peripheral nerves with nerve conduction studies and with high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS).

RESULTS

In 18 of the 34 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 15 years old), a sensorimotor axonal neuropathy was diagnosed. These patients presented with late-onset RLS were treated with membrane stabilizing agents, whereas no neuropathy predisposing comorbidity could be identified for the majority of them. We could show an inverse correlation between the amplitudes of the tibial nerve for the patients with polyneuropathy and the RLS severity index. Neuropathy patients were characterized by an increase of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa and by increased intranerve and internerve variability values showing an asymmetry of CSA distribution. This pattern resembles previous studies on diabetic neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis, characterization, and treatment of neuropathy are increasingly relevant for RLS patients as it correlates with disease severity. HRUS revealed a pattern resembling diabetic neuropathy, which implies a similar pathophysiology with metabolic and ischemic origin of RLS-related axonal neuropathy.

[Diagnostic nerve ultrasonography]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

For the diagnostics of nerve lesions an imaging method is necessary to visualize peripheral nerves and their surrounding structures for an etiological classification.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Clinical neurological and electrophysiological investigations provide functional information about nerve lesions. The information provided by a standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is inadequate for peripheral nerve diagnostics; however, MRI neurography is suitable but on the other hand a resource and time-consuming method.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Using ultrasonography for peripheral nerve diagnostics.

PERFORMANCE

With ultrasonography reliable diagnostics of entrapment neuropathies and traumatic nerve lesions are possible. The use of ultrasonography for neuropathies shows that a differentiation between different forms is possible.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Nerve ultrasonography is an established diagnostic tool. In addition to the clinical examination and clinical electrophysiology, structural information can be obtained, which results in a clear improvement in the diagnostics. Ultrasonography has become an integral part of the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in neurophysiological departments.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Nerve ultrasonography is recommended for the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in addition to clinical and electrophysiological investigations. It should be used in the clinical work-up of entrapment neuropathies, traumatic nerve lesions and spacy-occupying lesions of nerves.

Peripheral nerve ultrasound scoring systems: benchmarking and comparative analysis

Ultrasound of the nerves is an additive diagnostic tool to evaluate polyneuropathy. Recently, the need for standardized scoring systems has widely been discussed; different scores are described so far. Therefore, 327 patients with polyneuropathy were analyzed by ultrasound in our laboratory. Consequently, several ultrasound scoring tools were applied, i.e., the nerve pattern classification according to Padua et al. in all patients with CIDP and variants, the Bochum ultrasound score (BUS) and the neuritis ultrasound protocol in immune-mediated neuritis, the ultrasound pattern sum score, the homogeneity score, and the nerve enlargement distribution score in all neuropathies if possible. For all scores good accuracy was found. Most patients with CIDP revealed hypoechoic enlarged nerves (Class 1), the BUS/NUP was useful to identify GBS (sensitivity >85%), MMN (100%) and CIDP (>70%), while the UPSS showed high sensitivity and positive/negative predictive values (N/PPV) in the diagnosis of GBS (>70%), CIDP (>85%) and axonal non-inflammatory neuropathies (>90%). Homogeneous nerves were found in most CMT1 patients (66.7%), while immune-mediated neuropathies mostly show regional nerve enlargement. The HS was suitable to identify CMT patients with an HS ≥5 points. All scores were easily applicable with high accuracy. The former-reported results could be similarly confirmed. However, all sores have some incompleteness concerning unselected polyneuropathy population, particularly rare and focal types. Scoring systems are useful and easily applicable. They show high accuracy in certain neuropathies, but also offer some gaps and can, therefore, only be used in addition to standard diagnostic routines such as electrophysiology.

Testing nerves: an overview of investigations for neuropathy

This article reviews the main investigations available to assess and diagnose patients with neuropathy. It details the most commonly used as well as investigations now becoming routine in neuromuscular centres, and those which are less widely available. Current practice and recent developments are discussed.

The dilemma of diabetes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

PURPOSE

We reviewed the literature on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in diabetes mellitus (DM) and explored real-world data on the prevalence and treatment of CIDP within DM.

METHODS

A literature search of Scopus was performed for the terms chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, CIDP, and prevalence, incidence, epidemiology, or diabetes; peripheral neuropathy and prevalence or diabetes. We also searched through the reference lists of the resulting publications for additional findings that may have been missed. Additional publications on guidelines for the diagnosis of CIDP and diabetic neuropathy were also included. A descriptive analysis of the 2009-2013 PharMetrics Plus™ Database was performed to estimate the prevalence and treatment of CIDP within the DM population.

RESULTS

There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that the prevalence of CIDP tends to be higher in diabetic patients, especially in those of older age. Our real-world data seem to support published findings from the literature. For the total cohort (N=101,321,694), the percent prevalence of CIDP (n=8,173) was 0.008%; DM (n=4,026,740) was 4%. The percent prevalence of CIDP without DM (n=5,986) was 0.006%; CIDP with DM (n=2,187) was 9-fold higher at 0.054%. For patients >50years old, there was a significantly higher percentage of CIDP with DM than CIDP without DM. Approximately 50% of CIDP patients were treated with IVIg, 23%-24% with steroids, 1%-2% with PE, and 20%-23% received no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the growing evidence of higher prevalence of CIDP in DM, our findings reinforce the need for heightened awareness of the association of CIDP and DM.

High-Resolution Ultrasonography of the Superficial Peroneal Motor and Sural Sensory Nerves May Be a Non-invasive Approach to the Diagnosis of Vasculitic Neuropathy

High-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) is an emerging new tool in the investigation of peripheral nerves. We set out to assess the utility of HRUS performed at lower extremity nerves in peripheral neuropathies. Nerves of 26 patients with polyneuropathies of different etiologies and 26 controls were investigated using HRUS. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological assessment, and a diagnostic sural nerve biopsy as part of the routine work-up. HRUS was performed at the sural, tibial, and the common, superficial, and deep peroneal nerves. The superficial peroneal nerve longitudinal diameter (LD) distinguished best between the groups: patients with immune-mediated neuropathies (n = 13, including six with histology-proven vasculitic neuropathy) had larger LD compared to patients with non-immune-mediated neuropathies (p < 0.05) and to controls (p < 0.001). Among all subgroups, patients with vasculitic neuropathy showed the largest superficial peroneal nerve LD (p < 0.001) and had a larger sural nerve cross-sectional area when compared with disease controls (p < 0.001). Enlargement of the superficial peroneal and sural nerves as detected by HRUS may be a useful additional finding in the differential diagnosis of vasculitic and other immune-mediated neuropathies.

Sonographic evaluation of peripheral nerves in subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome

BACKGROUND

Sonography of peripheral nerves can depict alteration of nerve sizes that could reflect inflammation and edema in inflammatory and demyelinating neuropathies. Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Information on sonographic comparison of an axonal subtype (acute motor [and sensory] axonal neuropathy [AMAN and AMSAN]) and a demyelinating subtype (acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [AIDP]) has been sparse.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sonography of peripheral nerves and cervical nerve roots were prospectively recorded in patients with GBS who were within three weeks of disease onset.

RESULTS

Five patients with AIDP and nine with AMAN (n=6)/AMSAN (n=3) were enrolled. The patients with AIDP showed evidence of greater degrees of demyelination (e.g., slower conduction velocities and increased distal latencies) than those with AMAN/AMSAN. The patients with AIDP tended to show enlarged nerves in the proximal segments and in the cervical roots, whereas the patients with AMAN/AMSAN had greater enlargement in the distal neve segment, especially in the median nerve (P = 0.03; Wrist-axilla cross-sectional ratio).

CONCLUSION

In this small study, two subtypes of GBS showed different patterns of involvement that might reflect different pathomechanisms.

Ultrasound aspects in therapy-naive CIDP compared to long-term treated CIDP

To investigate the use of nerve ultrasound (NUS) along with the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) guidelines and clinical scores in untreated, recently diagnosed chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) vs. long-lasting treated CIDP. NUS and nerve conduction studies (NCS) of predefined nerves/cervical roots were performed in CIDP on diagnostic onset and "chronic-CIDP" (diagnosis and therapy >6 months), compared to controls. Nerve morphology was quantified using the modified ultrasound pattern sum score mUPSS, which is the sum of 3 ultrasound scores derived at 12 predefined measurement points and the homogeneity score (HS) in ulnar, median, and tibial nerve. 21 onset-CIDP, 21 "chronic-CIDP", and 21 age-matched controls were included. No differences in clinical scores or in the number of electrophysiologically affected nerves existed between the groups. Significantly enlarged cross-sectional areas of the nerves and diameters of the roots ensued already in onset-CIDP; however, with proximal predominance, whilst in chronic-CIDP, nerve enlargement was more prominent and ubiquitous. Increased UPS scores were shown in both patient groups compared to the controls. Significant differences between the patient groups were found particularly in the peripheral nerve score UPSA. Evaluation by means of HS revealed that the nerves in onset-CIDP were mostly regionally enlarged (often sparing distal segments) whereas in chronic-CIDP, nerves were more generalized enlarged. Onset- and chronic-CIDP show enlarged nerves and therefore increased mUPSS, however, nerve enlargement shows a more generalized pattern in chronic-CIDP compared to disease onset and correlates with disease duration and delayed therapy start, but not with disability.

Nerve Ultrasound in Peripheral Neuropathies: A Review

Peripheral neuropathies are one of the most common reasons for seeking neurological care in everyday practice. Electrophysiological studies remain fundamental for the diagnosis and etiological classification of peripheral nerve impairment. The recent technological development though of high resolution ultrasound has allowed the clinician to obtain detailed structural images of peripheral nerves. Nerve ultrasound mainly focuses on the evaluation of the cross sectional area, cross sectional area variability along the anatomical course, echogenity, vascularity and mobility of the peripheral nerves. An increase of the cross sectional area, hypervascularity, disturbed fascicular echostructure and reduced nerve mobility are some of the most common findings of entrapments neuropathies, such as the carpal or cubital tunnel syndrome. Both the cross-sectional area increase and the hypervascularity detected with the Doppler technique seem to correlate significantly with the clinical and electrophysiological severity of the later mononeuropathies. Significantly greater cross sectional area values of the clinically affected cervical nerve root are often detected in cases of cervical radiculopathy. In such cases, the ultrasound findings seem also to correlate significantly with disease duration. On the other hand, multifocal cross sectional area enlargement of cervical roots and/or peripheral nerves is often documented in cases of immune-mediated neuropathies. None of the later pathological ultrasound findings seem to correlate significantly with the electrophysiological parameters or the functional disability. The aim of this review is to provide a timely update on the role of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnostic of the most common entrapment and immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies in clinical practice.

The Ultrasound pattern sum score - UPSS. A new method to differentiate acute and subacute neuropathies using ultrasound of the peripheral nerves

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound differentiation of neuropathies is a great challenge. We, therefore, suggest a standardized score to operationalize differentiation between several acute and subacute onset neuropathies.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound data of 61 patients with acute or subacute neuropathies, e.g. chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and axonal/vasculitic neuropathies. We compared these data to 28 healthy controls. Based on these results an ultrasound pattern sum score (UPSS) with three sub-scores (UPS-A for the sensorimotor nerves, UPS-B for the cervical roots and the vagal nerve and UPS-C for the sural nerve) was developed. Afterwards, the applicability of the score was prospectively validated in 10 patients with chronic neuropathies and in 14 patients with unknown acute and subacute PNP before performing additional tests.

RESULTS

UPS-A and UPSS were significantly higher in CIDP than in other neuropathies and controls (p<0.001). UPS-B was significantly more often pathologic in GBS than in CIDP and other neuropathies (p<0.001). Using receiver operation characteristics curve analysis boundary values for each score were defined. Positive predictive value (PPV) of these scores for CIDP and GBS was >85%. Vasculitic neuropathies showed an intermediate type of UPSS compared to other axonal neuropathies (p<0.001). In the prospective application the pattern score could be used with good accuracy in several types of neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

UPS-A and UPSS operationalize to diagnose acute and subacute-onset CIDP and its variants with high sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. An increased UPS-B with normal UPSS and other sub scores may point to the diagnosis of GBS with high PPV and enables the differentiation from CIDP.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using the UPSS and its sub-scores gives a new diagnostic power to the method of the peripheral nerve ultrasound.