Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma

Imaging and Liquid Biopsy for Distinguishing True Progression From Pseudoprogression in Gliomas, Current Advances and Challenges

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Gliomas are aggressive brain tumors with a poor prognosis. Assessing treatment response is challenging because magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not distinguish true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP). This review aims to discuss imaging techniques and liquid biopsies used to distinguish TP from PsP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review synthesizes existing literature to examine advances in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance diffusion imaging (MRDI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) MRI, and liquid biopsies, for identifying TP or PsP through tumor markers and tissue characteristics.

RESULTS

Advanced imaging techniques, including MRDI and PWI MRI, have proven effective in delineating tumor tissue properties, offering valuable insights into glioma behavior. Similarly, liquid biopsy has emerged as a potent tool for identifying tumor-derived markers in biofluids, offering a non-invasive glimpse into tumor evolution. Despite their promise, these methodologies grapple with significant challenges. Their sensitivity remains inconsistent, complicating the accurate differentiation between TP and PSP. Furthermore, the absence of standardized protocols across platforms impedes the reliability of comparisons, while inherent biological variability adds complexity to data interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Their potential applications have been highlighted, but gaps remain before routine clinical use. Further research is needed to develop and validate these promising methods for distinguishing TP from PsP in gliomas.

Early pseudoprogression and progression lesions in glioblastoma patients are both metabolically heterogeneous

The standard treatment in glioblastoma includes maximal safe resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide. The first follow-up study to evaluate treatment response is performed 1 month after concomitant treatment, when contrast-enhancing regions may appear that can correspond to true progression or pseudoprogression. We retrospectively evaluated 31 consecutive patients at the first follow-up after concomitant treatment to check whether the metabolic pattern assessed with multivoxel MRS was predictive of treatment response 2 months later. We extracted the underlying metabolic patterns of the contrast-enhancing regions with a blind-source separation method and mapped them over the reference images. Pattern heterogeneity was calculated using entropy, and association between patterns and outcomes was measured with Cramér's V. We identified three distinct metabolic patterns-proliferative, necrotic, and responsive, which were associated with status 2 months later. Individually, 70% of the patients showed metabolically heterogeneous patterns in the contrast-enhancing regions. Metabolic heterogeneity was not related to the regions' size and only stable patients were less heterogeneous than the rest. Contrast-enhancing regions are also metabolically heterogeneous 1 month after concomitant treatment. This could explain the reported difficulty in finding robust pseudoprogression biomarkers.

Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know

Management of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is complex and involves implementing standard therapies including resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, as well as novel immunotherapies and targeted small-molecule inhibitors through clinical trials and precision medicine approaches. As treatments have advanced, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with GBM has become even more challenging and nuanced. Advances in spatial resolution and both anatomical and physiological information that can be derived from MRI have greatly improved the noninvasive assessment of GBM before, during, and after therapy. Identification of pseudoprogression (PsP), defined as changes concerning for tumor progression that are, in fact, transient and related to treatment response, is critical for successful patient management. These temporary changes can produce new clinical symptoms due to mass effect and edema. Differentiating this entity from true tumor progression is a major decision point in the patient's management and prognosis. Providers may choose to start an alternative therapy, transition to a clinical trial, consider repeat resection, or continue with the current therapy in hopes of resolution. In this review, the authors describe the invasive and noninvasive techniques neurosurgeons need to be aware of to identify PsP and facilitate surgical decision-making.

Downfield Proton MRSI at 3 Tesla: A Pilot Study in Human Brain Tumors

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of 3D downfield proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (DF-MRSI) for evaluation of tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

Seven patients (4F, age range 44-65 and mean ± standard deviation 59.3 ± 7.5 years) with previously treated GBM were scanned using a recently developed 3D DF-MRSI sequence at 3T. Short TE 3D DF-MRSI and water reference 3D-MRSI scans were collected with a nominal spatial resolution of 0.7 cm3. DF volume data in eight slices covered 12 cm of brain in the cranio-caudal axis. Data were analyzed using the 'LCModel' program and a basis set containing nine peaks ranging in frequency between 6.83 to 8.49 ppm. The DF8.18 (assigned to amides) and DF7.90 peaks were selected for the creation of metabolic images and statistical analysis. Longitudinal MR images and clinical history were used to classify brain lesions as either recurrent tumor or treatment effect, which may include necrosis. DF-MRSI data were compared between lesion groups (recurrent tumor, treatment effect) and normal-appearing brain.

RESULTS

Of the seven brain tumor patients, two were classified as having recurrent tumor and the rest were classified as treatment effect. Amide metabolite levels from recurrent tumor regions were significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to both normal-appearing brain and treatment effect regions. Amide levels in lesion voxels classified as treatment effect were significantly lower than normal brain.

CONCLUSIONS

3D DF-MRSI in human brain tumors at 3T is feasible and was well tolerated by all patients enrolled in this preliminary study. Amide levels measured by 3D DF-MRSI were significantly different between treatment effect and tumor regrowth.

Taming Glioblastoma in "Real Time": Integrating Multimodal Advanced Neuroimaging/AI Tools Towards Creating a Robust and Therapy Agnostic Model for Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology

The highly aggressive nature of glioblastoma carries a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Alternative treatment regimens, such as immunotherapies, are known to intensify the inflammatory response in the treatment field. Follow-up imaging in these scenarios often mimics disease progression on conventional MRI, making accurate evaluation extremely challenging. To this end, revised criteria for assessment of treatment response in high-grade gliomas were successfully proposed by the RANO Working Group to distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression, with intrinsic constraints related to the postcontrast T1-weighted MRI sequence. To address these existing limitations, our group proposes a more objective and quantifiable "treatment agnostic" model, integrating into the RANO criteria advanced multimodal neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), dynamic susceptibility contrast-perfusion weighted imaging (DSC-PWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI, MR spectroscopy, and amino acid-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers, along with artificial intelligence (AI) tools (radiomics, radiogenomics, and radiopathomics) and molecular information to address this complex issue of treatment-related changes versus tumor progression in "real-time", particularly in the early posttreatment window. Our perspective delineates the potential of incorporating multimodal neuroimaging techniques to improve consistency and automation for the assessment of early treatment response in neuro-oncology.

Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas

BACKGROUND

Accurate differentiation of pseudoprogression (PsP) from tumor progression (TP) in glioblastomas (GBMs) is essential for appropriate clinical management and prognostication of these patients. In the present study, we sought to validate the findings of our previously developed multiparametric MRI model in a new cohort of GBM patients treated with standard therapy in identifying PsP cases.

METHODS

Fifty-six GBM patients demonstrating enhancing lesions within 6 months after completion of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) underwent anatomical imaging, diffusion and perfusion MRI on a 3 T magnet. Subsequently, patients were classified as TP + mixed tumor (n = 37) and PsP (n = 19). When tumor specimens were available from repeat surgery, histopathologic findings were used to identify TP + mixed tumor (> 25% malignant features; n = 34) or PsP (< 25% malignant features; n = 16). In case of non-availability of tumor specimens, ≥ 2 consecutive conventional MRIs using mRANO criteria were used to determine TP + mixed tumor (n = 3) or PsP (n = 3). The multiparametric MRI-based prediction model consisted of predictive probabilities (PP) of tumor progression computed from diffusion and perfusion MRI derived parameters from contrast enhancing regions. In the next step, PP values were used to characterize each lesion as PsP or TP+ mixed tumor. The lesions were considered as PsP if the PP value was < 50% and TP+ mixed tumor if the PP value was ≥ 50%. Pearson test was used to determine the concordance correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used as a quantitative measure for assessing the discriminatory accuracy of the prediction model in identifying PsP and TP+ mixed tumor.

RESULTS

Multiparametric MRI model correctly predicted PsP in 95% (18/19) and TP+ mixed tumor in 57% of cases (21/37) with an overall concordance rate of 70% (39/56) with final diagnosis as determined by histopathology/mRANO criteria. There was a significant concordant correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). The ROC analyses revealed an accuracy of 75.7% in distinguishing PsP from TP+ mixed tumor. Leave-one-out cross-validation test revealed that 73.2% of cases were correctly classified as PsP and TP + mixed tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multiparametric MRI based prediction model may be helpful in identifying PsP in GBM patients.

Highlighted Advances in Therapies for Difficult-To-Treat Brain Tumours Such as Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains a challenging disease, as it is the most common and deadly brain tumour in adults and has no curative solution and an overall short survival time. This incurability and short survival time means that, despite its rarity (average incidence of 3.2 per 100,000 persons), there has been an increased effort to try to treat this disease. Standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal tumour resection followed by initial concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) and then further chemotherapy with TMZ. Imaging techniques are key not only to diagnose the extent of the affected tissue but also for surgery planning and even for intraoperative use. Eligible patients may combine TMZ with tumour treating fields (TTF) therapy, which delivers low-intensity and intermediate-frequency electric fields to arrest tumour growth. Nonetheless, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and systemic side effects are obstacles to successful chemotherapy in GBM; thus, more targeted, custom therapies such as immunotherapy and nanotechnological drug delivery systems have been undergoing research with varying degrees of success. This review proposes an overview of the pathophysiology, possible treatments, and the most (not all) representative examples of the latest advancements.

Radiomics analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted and structural MR images for treatment response assessment in malignant gliomas

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI radiomic features for the differentiation of tumor recurrence from treatment effect in malignant gliomas. Eighty-six patients who had suspected tumor recurrence after completion of chemoradiation or radiotherapy, and who had APTw-MRI data acquired at 3 T, were retrospectively analyzed. Using a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image-based mask, radiomics analysis was applied to the processed APTw and structural MR images. A chi-square automatic interaction detector decision tree was used for classification analysis. Models with and without APTw features were built using the same strategy. Tenfold cross-validation was applied to obtain the overall classification performance of each model. Sixty patients were confirmed as having tumor recurrence, and the remainder were confirmed as having treatment effect, at median time points of 190 and 171 days after therapy, respectively. There were 525 radiomic features extracted from each of the processed APTw and structural MR images. Based on these, the APTw-based model yielded the highest accuracy (86.0%) for the differentiation of tumor recurrence from treatment effect, compared with 74.4%, 76.7%, 83.7%, and 76.7% for T1 w, T2 w, FLAIR, and Gd-T1 w, respectively. Model classification accuracy was 82.6% when using the combined structural MR images (T1 w, T2 w, FLAIR, Gd-T1 w), and increased to 89.5% when using these structural plus APTw images. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 85.0% and 76.9% for the combination of structural MR images, and 85.0% and 100% after adding APTw image features. Adding APTw-based radiomic features increased MRI accuracy in the assessment of the treatment response in post-treatment malignant gliomas.

A Comparison of PET Tracers in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review

Humans with high-grade gliomas have a poor prognosis, with a mean survival time of just 12-18 months for patients who undergo standard-of-care tumor resection and adjuvant therapy. Currently, surgery and chemoradiotherapy serve as standard treatments for this condition, yet these can be complicated by the tumor location, growth rate and recurrence. Currently, gadolinium-based, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) serves as the predominant imaging modality for recurrent high-grade gliomas, but it faces several drawbacks, including its inability to distinguish tumor recurrence from treatment-related changes and its failure to reveal the entirety of tumor burden (de novo or recurrent) due to limitations inherent to gadolinium contrast. As such, alternative imaging modalities that can address these limitations, including positron emission tomography (PET), are worth pursuing. To this end, the identification of PET-based markers for use in imaging of recurrent high-grade gliomas is paramount. This review will highlight several PET radiotracers that have been implemented in clinical practice and provide a comparison between them to assess the efficacy of these tracers.

Imaging Findings of 18F-Choline and 18F-DOPA PET/MRI in a Case of Glioblastoma Multiforme Pseudoprogression: Correlation with Clinical Outcome

We describe the case of 74-year-old-male, previously treated with fronto-parietal craniotomy due to primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, at 1 month after completing RT + TMZ, depicted partial response. Three months later, the patient was submitted to a further brain MRI, that resulted doubtful for therapy induced changes (i.e., pseudoprogression). The patient, who had been previously treated with prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PC), underwent a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with 18F-choline for PC biochemical recurrence. 18F-choline whole body PET/CT resulted negative for PC relapse, while segmental brain PET, co-registered with MRI, demonstrated increased tracer uptake corresponding to tumor boundaries. In order to solve differential diagnosis between pseudoprogression and GBM recurrence, brain PET/CT with 18F-L-dihydroxy-phenil-alanine (18F-DOPA) was subsequently performed: fused axial PET/MRI images showed increased 18F-DOPA incorporation in the peri-tumoral edema, but not in tumor boundaries, consistent with the suspicion of GBM pseudoprogression, as then confirmed by clinical and radiological follow-up.

Tumor Progression and Treatment-Related Changes: Radiological Diagnosis Challenges for the Evaluation of Post Treated Glioma

Simple Summary

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the adult central nervous system. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, its prognosis remains poor. During follow-up, it remains challenging to distinguish treatment-related changes from tumor progression in treated patients with gliomas due to both share clinical symptoms and morphological imaging characteristics (with new and/or increasing enhancing mass lesions). The early effective identification of tumor progression and treatment-related changes is of great significance for the prognosis and treatment of gliomas. We believe that advanced neuroimaging techniques can provide additional information for distinguishing both at an early stage. In this article, we focus on the research of magnetic resonance imaging technology and artificial intelligence in tumor progression and treatment-related changes. Finally, it provides new ideas and insights for clinical diagnosis.

Abstract

As the most common neuro-epithelial tumors of the central nervous system in adults, gliomas are highly malignant and easy to recurrence, with a dismal prognosis. Imaging studies are indispensable for tracking tumor progression (TP) or treatment-related changes (TRCs). During follow-up, distinguishing TRCs from TP in treated patients with gliomas remains challenging as both share similar clinical symptoms and morphological imaging characteristics (with new and/or increasing enhancing mass lesions) and fulfill criteria for progression. Thus, the early identification of TP and TRCs is of great significance for determining the prognosis and treatment. Histopathological biopsy is currently the gold standard for TP and TRC diagnosis. However, the invasive nature of this technique limits its clinical application. Advanced imaging methods (e.g., diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), amide proton transfer (APT) and artificial intelligence (AI)) provide a non-invasive and feasible technical means for identifying of TP and TRCs at an early stage, which have recently become research hotspots. This paper reviews the current research on using the abovementioned advanced imaging methods to identify TP and TRCs of gliomas. First, the review focuses on the pathological changes of the two entities to establish a theoretical basis for imaging identification. Then, it elaborates on the application of different imaging techniques and AI in identifying the two entities. Finally, the current challenges and future prospects of these techniques and methods are discussed.