'The hospital and everyday life are two worlds': Patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perspectives on collaboration in the kidney transplantation process

Co-Designing Remote Patient Monitoring Technologies for Inpatients: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The co-design of health technology enables patient-centeredness and can help reduce barriers to technology use.

OBJECTIVE

The study objectives were to identify what remote patient monitoring (RPM) technology has been co-designed for inpatients and how effective it is, to identify and describe the co-design approaches used to develop RPM technologies and in which contexts they emerge, and to identify and describe barriers and facilitators of the co-design process.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of co-designed RPM technologies for inpatients or for the immediate postdischarge period and assessed (1) their effectiveness in improving health outcomes, (2) the co-design approaches used, and (3) barriers and facilitators to the co-design process. Eligible records included those involving stakeholders co-designing RPM technology for use in the inpatient setting or during the immediate postdischarge period. Searches were limited to the English language within the last 10 years. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Science Citation Index (Web of Science) in April 2023. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for quasi-experimental studies and qualitative research. Findings are presented narratively.

RESULTS

We screened 3334 reports, and 17 projects met the eligibility criteria. Interventions were designed for pre- and postsurgical monitoring (n=6), intensive care monitoring (n=2), posttransplant monitoring (n=3), rehabilitation (n=4), acute inpatients (n=1), and postpartum care (n=1). No projects evaluated the efficacy of their co-designed RPM technology. Three pilot studies reported clinical outcomes; their risk of bias was low to moderate. Pilot evaluations (11/17) also focused on nonclinical outcomes such as usability, usefulness, feasibility, and satisfaction. Common co-design approaches included needs assessment or ideation (16/17), prototyping (15/17), and pilot testing (11/17). The most commonly reported challenge to the co-design process was the generalizability of findings, closely followed by time and resource constraints and participant bias. Stakeholders' perceived value was the most frequently reported enabler of co-design. Other enablers included continued stakeholder engagement and methodological factors (ie, the use of flexible mixed method approaches and prototyping).

CONCLUSIONS

Co-design methods can help enhance interventions' relevance, usability, and adoption. While included studies measured usability, satisfaction, and acceptability-critical factors for successful implementation and uptake-we could not determine the clinical effectiveness of co-designed RPM technologies. A stronger commitment to clinical evaluation is needed. Studies' use of diverse co-design approaches can foster stakeholder inclusivity, but greater standardization in co-design terminology is needed to improve the quality and consistency of co-design research.

Epistemological aspects of participatory design studies conducted in the field of health science

AIM(S)

To discuss the methodological aspects of participatory design, arguing for a three-phase approach and the suitability of situating participatory design within a phenomenological-hermeneutical tradition in health science.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Methodological discussion based on participatory design theory, epistemology and research studies.

RESULTS

The epistemological and methodological discussions show how the core values and key elements of participatory design align with the phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. In addition, examples of participatory design studies are provided to illustrate how it can be conducted in health science.

CONCLUSION

Participatory design is a flexible framework based on genuine participation, defined by three core values: having a say, mutual learning and democratization. The iterative processes allow for adjustments in alignment with the core values and the scientific stance that defines the choice of methods, tools and techniques. A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach in participatory design studies is relevant and aligned with the core values of participatory design. Thus, this paper argues for a close integration between the participatory design methodology and the phenomenological-hermeneutic scientific approach within health science.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

Participatory design is a powerful methodology with core values that can co-design sustainable health technologies with potential to impact patient care and the clinical practice of nurses. When combined with qualitative research methods, patients' lived experiences serve as the foundation for improving clinical nursing practice. Discussing the epistemological aspects of participatory design provides nurse researchers with a coherent methodological understanding, essential for the continual development of nursing research.

IMPACT

This paper discusses the research methodology of participatory design within health sciences. It aims to address the lack of understanding of the methodology, particularly within a specific scientific stance. The main finding is the elaboration on participatory design and the relevance of a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. The paper has the potential to impact researchers, master's and PhD students, as well as others engaged in participatory design or other methodologies related to user involvement within health science.

REPORTING METHOD

No available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper, as no new data were created or analysed.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

There was no direct patient or public contribution, as this is a methodological paper.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward postoperative self-management among kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Patient involvement is crucial to the success of kidney transplants. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward postoperative self-management among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Ruijin Hospital (Shanghai, China) between March 24, 2023, and April 15, 2023 in kidney transplant recipients. A questionnaire was designed to collect data about the characteristics of the participants and their KAP toward postoperative self-management. KAP scores were calculated based on participants' responses, using predefined scoring criteria tailored to evaluate each dimension of KAP effectively.

RESULTS

A total of 483 valid questionnaires were collected, including 189 (39.13%) participants aged between 46 and 60 years. The mean score of knowledge, attitude and practice were 23.44 ± 4.87 (possible range: 0-28), 43.59 ± 2.65 (possible range: 10-50), 52.52 ± 4.64 (possible range: 0-58), respectively. The multivariate analysis showed knowledge scores (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10-1.20, p < 0.001), attitude scores (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.12-1.32, p < 0.001) and undergone transplantation within 1 year (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 1.60-9.63, p = 0.003) were independently associated with good practice. Knowledge scores (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10, p = 0.003), attitude scores (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.08-1.25, p < 0.001), aged 16-35 years (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.18-0.78, p = 0.009), underwent a single kidney transplant surgery (OR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.28-12.38, p = 0.017) were independently associated with medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplant recipients had good knowledge, positive attitude and good practice toward postoperative self-management. Implementing personalized education, psychological support, and close monitoring strategies is recommended to optimize postoperative self-management in kidney transplant recipients.

Self-management experiences of haemodialysis patients with self-regulatory fatigue: A phenomenological study

AIM

To understand the real experiences of self-management in haemodialysis patients with self-regulatory fatigue, and to explore the influencing factors and coping strategies for patients with decreased self-management.

DESIGN

A qualitative study was carried out using the phenomenological analysis method.

METHODS

From 5 January to 25 February, 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 haemodialysis patients in Lanzhou, China. Thematic analysis of the data was performed using the NVivo 12 software based on the 7 steps of Colaizzi's method. The study reporting followed the SRQR checklist.

RESULTS

Five themes and 13 sub-themes were identified. The main themes were difficulties in fluid restrictions and emotional management, hard to adhere to long-term self-management, uncertainty about self-management, influencing factors are complex and diverse and coping strategies should be further improved.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the difficulties, uncertainty, influencing facts and coping strategies of self-management among haemodialysis patients with self-regulatory fatigue. A targeted program should be developed and implemented according to the characteristics of patients to reduce the level of self-regulatory fatigue and improve self-management.

IMPACT

Self-regulatory fatigue has a significant impact on the self-management behaviour of haemodialysis patients. Understanding the real experiences of self-management in haemodialysis patients with self-regulatory fatigue enables medical staff to correctly identify the occurrence of self-regulatory fatigue in time and help patients adopt positive coping strategies to keep effective self-management behaviour.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Haemodialysis patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited to participate in the study from a blood purification centre in Lanzhou, China.

Evaluation of a telehealth solution developed to improve follow-up after kidney Transplantation

AIM

To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences of using a telehealth solution developed to improve follow-up after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Transplantation is the treatment of choice whenever feasible for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, it implies lifelong adherence of self-monitoring, medicine and other restrictions to ensure successful outcomes. Based on user involvement, a telehealth solution was developed to support patients and healthcare professionals post-transplantation.

DESIGN

An explorative qualitative study with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach.

METHODS

The developed app and workflow for follow-up were tested by patients and healthcare professionals and evaluated with interviews. In total, 16 patients and 20 healthcare professionals participated. Individual interviews were conducted with the patients, four nurses participated in two sets of interviews, and 16 doctors participated in a focus group. Data were analysed with inspiration from Ricoeur's theory of interpretation, on three levels: Naïve reading, structural analysis and critical interpretation and discussion. The COREQ checklist was applied in reporting the study.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged: Challenging conditions for training sessions, telehealth improves patient reflection and collaboration, and telehealth gives patients a voice in consultations. In a challenging time, post-transplantation patients found the app easy to use; it facilitated support and reflection on how to manage. It also supported both patients and healthcare professionals at follow-up consultations in terms of enhanced preparation, improved dialogue and enabling consultations by phone.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that patients and healthcare professionals found the app and workflow valuable and easy to use. The Patient Data feature in the app has potential as a communication tool. However, adjustments and further investigations are needed to develop the solution.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The potential of telehealth brings new opportunities to provide treatment and care to newly transplanted patients. Telehealth can support both patients and health professionals by improving dialogue and collaboration.

User involvement in the development of a telehealth solution to improve the kidney transplantation process: A participatory design study

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, and leads to everyday self-management of this chronic condition. This article aims to provide documentation for a participatory design study of a telehealth solution to improve the kidney transplantation process, and to identify the impact from the different participants in the participatory design study. Through a participatory design approach, a smartphone application (app) was developed for the entire kidney transplantation process together with a workflow for post-transplantation follow-up. A core element in participatory design is user involvement. By way of workshops and laboratory tests, the telehealth solution was developed in close cooperation with patients, their families, healthcare professionals, kidney association representatives, and Information Technology designers. The participatory design approach means that the telehealth solution was designed to be functional in a clinical setting, address patients' needs, and support their self-management.