First-Line Osimertinib in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Outcome and Safety in the Real World: FLOWER Study

A Prospective Phase II Trial of First-Line Osimertinib for Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC and Poor Performance Status (OPEN/TORG2040)

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is the first-line treatment for patients with NSCLC who have EGFR mutations and favorable performance status (PS). Despite the increasing clinical data on osimertinib, evidence for its use in patients with impaired PS remains limited. Therefore, a multicenter phase II trial (OPEN/TORG2040) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and a poor PS.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations and PS of 2 to 4 were enrolled. Osimertinib (80 mg once daily) was orally administered to eligible patients. The primary end point was objective response rate. The secondary end points were disease control rate, PS improvement rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

RESULTS

Between February 2021 and February 2022, 30 patients with poor PS (22 with a PS of 2, six with a PS of 3, and two with a PS of 4) were enrolled. The median age was 75 (range, 41-92) years, and 18 patients had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 63.3% (90% confidence interval, 46.7%-77.9%; one-sided, p = 0.033). Disease control and PS improvement rates were 93.3% and 63.3%, respectively. Global health status/QoL also improved. Median progression-free and overall survival were 8.0 and 25.4 months, respectively. Eight patients (26.7%) experienced serious adverse events leading to discontinuation, and six (20.0%) experienced interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirmed the efficacy of first-line osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and poor PS, highlighting the need for interstitial lung disease risk management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs041200100.

Real-world comparative outcomes of EGFR-TKIs for first-line treatment of EGFR+ metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI and preferred first-line (1L) treatment for EGFR positive (EGFR+) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). This study compared real-world clinical outcomes of 1L osimertinib versus 1st or 2nd generation EGFR-TKIs (1/2G-TKIs) in patients with EGFR+ mNSCLC.

METHODS

Nine academic cancer centers in the US participated in the retrospective cohort study. Patients aged ≥18 years with EGFR+ mNSCLC and treated with 1L EGFR-TKI were included. Clinical outcomes included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), duration of treatment (DOT), time to next treatment (TTNT), central nervous system incidence-free survival (CNS-IFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable regression models were used to control for differences in patient characteristics (p < 0.1) between the osimertinib and 1/2G-TKI cohorts.

RESULTS

The study included 181 osimertinib patients and 171 1/2G-TKI patients. Osimertinib had a longer rwPFS compared to 1/2G-TKIs (median PFS, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 16.2 months (13.2-19.7) vs. 10.8 months (9.5-12.7); hazard Ratio [HR], 95 % CI: 0.60 (0.44-0.82). DOT and TTNT were significantly longer in patients treated with osimertinib versus 1/2G-TKI (HR, 95 % CI: 0.51 (0.38-0.68) for DOT; 0.54 (0.39-0.74) for TTNT). The respective HR point estimate for CNF-IFS and OS of 0.62 and 0.83 preferred osimertinib. However, small patient counts and number of events posed challenges in drawing conclusion regarding the significance of the delayed CNS-IFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with osimertinib had a prolonged time to progression and longer time maintain the treatment compared to 1/2G-TKI. This real-world evidence is aligned with clinical trial results.

Healthcare resource utilization and associated cost in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated in the immunotherapy era

BACKGROUND

Treatment approach for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has revolutionized in the recent decade with the introduction of immunotherapy and targeted medications in first-line (1L) therapy. We present real-world data on clinical outcomes and direct healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost in a 2.7-million-member Israeli health provider.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed mNSCLC patients between January 2017 and December 2020 were categorized by 1L treatment: platinum-based chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy. HCRU and costs were calculated based on the Ministry of Health Prices and were assessed at a minimum of 6 months' follow-up (cutoff: 30 June 2021).

RESULTS

A total of 886 patients were included in the study: 40.6% female, median age 68 years (IQR 61-74), 24.3% never smokers, 80.6% with adenocarcinoma, and 54% with a 0-1 performance status. The median follow-up was 27.12 months (95% CI, 24.7-29.6) and the median duration of first-line (1L) treatment was 2.3 months for platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 177), 12.3 months for targeted therapy (n = 255), and 4.8 months for immunotherapy (n = 463). The median overall survival was 9.09, 27.68, and 12.46 months, respectively. Total 1L costs were driven by radiotherapy for platinum-based chemotherapy and medication for targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Total costs for deceased patients over the entire follow-up were €121 155, €129 458, and €110 716, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of mNSCLC carries a high economic burden, primarily driven by first-line therapy, especially with targeted and immune therapies. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of innovative treatments on the disease management costs of mNSCLC.

Rebiopsy Enhances Survival with Afatinib vs. Osimertinib in EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Afatinib and Osimertinib are first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their comparative efficacies and the patient groups that benefit the most remain unclear. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of first-line Afatinib and Osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases at diagnosis.

METHODS

The primary endpoints were time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed for three groups: Afatinib followed by Osimertinib, Afatinib followed by other therapies, and Osimertinib (alone or followed by other therapies). Rebiopsy practices, including T790M mutation detection, were also analyzed in patients with disease progression on Afatinib.

RESULTS

Among 97 Afatinib-treated and 60 Osimertinib-treated patients, Osimertinib showed a significantly longer ToT (23.3 vs. 16.5 months; p = 0.007). Median OS was numerically higher for Afatinib with sequential Osimertinib (40.5 vs. 34.6 months for Osimertinib; p = 0.473). Osimertinib demonstrated advantages, with fewer brain metastases upon progression and fewer adverse effects. In the Afatinib group, 64% of patients with disease progression underwent rebiopsy, with 39% testing positive for T790M mutation and subsequently receiving Osimertinib. Rebiopsy was most frequently performed on the lung parenchyma using non-surgical methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, Osimertinib achieved a significantly longer ToT compared to Afatinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases. The sequential use of Afatinib followed by Osimertinib showed a trend toward improved OS, highlighting the importance of rebiopsy for identifying T790M mutations to guide subsequent therapy.

The relevance of the reference range for EGFR testing in non-small cell lung cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Identifying mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene is crucial for individualized treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Accordingly, several methodologies and instruments are now commercially available to detect these alterations. The aim of this study was to examine the performance of next generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting both common and uncommon EGFR gene mutations in advanced NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved molecular data from n = 1312 advanced stage NSCLC patients tested by our NGS DNA-based panel (namely SiRe® panel) from January 2018 to December 2022. We subsequently compared the NGS results with the reference ranges of the most popular real time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays (cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2, EasyPGX® ready EGFR, Idylla™ EGFR mutation test, and therascreen® EGFR Plus RGQ).

RESULTS

Overall, NGS detected n = 234 mutations in n = 192 (15.9 %) patients. Conversely, when these results were compared with the reference ranges of the four most common commercially available RT-qPCR assays, far fewer mutations were identified: n = 18 (9.4 %), n = 17 (8.9 %), n = 17 (8.9 %), and n = 18 (9.4 %) mutations. These results suggest that if patients were tested solely using RT-qPCR assays, a substantial proportion would have been ineligible for targeted therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights that NGS is able to identify a much higher number of actionable EGFR mutations than RT-qPCR approaches, thereby providing many more patients the opportunity to receive targeted EGFR treatments.

Association between epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venous thromboembolism among older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is higher among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and specific subgroups, including the elderly, but little is known about the VTE risk of different generations of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and whether the risk differs by demographic characteristics. This study aims to compare the risk of VTE (deep venous thromboembolism [DVT]; pulmonary embolism [PE]) between a third-generation EGFR-TKI and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and stratify VTE risk by sex, age, and race/ethnicity in third-generation EGFR-TKI users.

METHODS

Via the 2006-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, this retrospective cohort study included older patients (aged ≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC who initiated on a third-generation EGFR-TKI (n = 493) and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (n = 1036). We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A third-generation EGFR-TKI had a significantly higher VTE risk than first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01-1.57]; p = .037), with an elevated risk in males (HR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.47-3.19]; p < .001), patients aged ≥75 years (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.83]; p = .026), and non-Hispanic Whites (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.10-1.95]; p = .010). Males consistently showed a significantly higher risk of DVT (HR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.29-4.80]; p = .007) and PE (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.29-3.11]; p = .002). A significantly higher risk of DVT (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.00-2.37]; p = .050) and PE (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.06-2.05]; p = .021) was shown in patients aged ≥75 years and non-Hispanic Whites, respectively. Among third-generation EGFR-TKI users, non-Hispanic Whites had a significantly higher risk of VTE (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.03-4.02]; p = .041) and PE (HR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.24-6.70]; p = .014) than non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders.

CONCLUSIONS

Close monitoring of VTE events in high-risk patients is essential to promote early diagnosis and treatment.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung carcinomas with insufficient response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

Administration of single-agent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a standard treatment option for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinomas with EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) and L858R substitutions. However, there is a significant interpatient heterogeneity with regard to the degree of the response and its duration. Patients with EGFR ex19del mutation, TP53 wild-type, good performance status, low tumor burden and no circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline have the best chances to derive pronounced benefit from TKI therapy. In contrast, subjects with EGFR L858R substitution, mutated TP53, poor overall condition, high tumor volume and detectable ctDNA are generally poor responders to EGFR inhibitors. ctDNA dynamics in the first days or weeks of treatment allows reliable identification of patients, who are very unlikely to derive clinically meaningful benefit from single-agent TKIs. These patients are candidates for clinical trials, which may involve the addition of chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs to patients, who failed to achieve immediate benefit from TKI monotherapy.

Osimertinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Overall Survival, Post-progression Management and Budget Impact Analysis in Real-World

INTRODUCTION

The observational multicenter prospective FLOWER study (NCT04965701) confirmed effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in the real-world (RW) management of untreated EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Herein, we report updated survival data, post-progression management, cost/effectiveness and budget impact (BI) of osimertinib compared with a RW population receiving gefitinib or erlotinib.

RESULTS

Overall, 189 Caucasian patients receiving first-line osimertinib were included. After a follow-up of 20.7 months, 74(39.2%) patients discontinued osimertinib, median time-to-treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was 27.9 months, overall survival 36.8 months. At progression, tissue biopsy was performed in 29 (56.9%), liquid biopsy in 15 (29.4%) and both in 7 (13.7%) cases. The most frequent resistant mechanism was MET amplification (N = 14, 29.8%). At data cutoff, 13 (6.9%) patients were continuing osimertinib beyond progression; 52 (67.5%) received second-line treatment; no further treatments were administered in 25 (32.5%) cases. Thirty-three (63.4%) patients received chemotherapy, 12(23.1%) TKIs combination. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed a total cost per patient based on RW mTTD of 98,957.34€, 21,726.28€ and 19,637.83€ for osimertinib, erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/month for osimertinib was 359,806.0€/life-year-gained (LYG) and 197,789.77€/LYG compared to erlotinib and gefitinib. For osimertinib, the BI-gap between RW-TTD and theoretical-TTD was 16,501.0€ per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated analysis confirms the effectiveness of osimertinib in RW. Although the ICER of osimertinib seems not cost-effective, additional costs for the management of disease progression to old generation TKIs were not considered in this study. The BI-gap suggests RW mTTD as a more reliable measure for expense estimation.

Real-World Analysis of Post-Progression Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients Treated with First-Line Osimertinib

Introduction: The use of osimertinib in the first-line (1L) setting is an effective treatment option for sensitizing EGFR-mutations (EGFRm+) and has significantly altered the standard of care practice for EGFRm+ disease in Canada. Unfortunately, acquired resistance to osimertinib is almost universal, and outcomes are disparate. Post-progression treatment patterns and the outcome of real-world Canadian EGFRm+ patients receiving 1L osimertinib were the focus of this retrospective review. Methods: The Glans-Look Lung Cancer Research database was used to identify and collect demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome data on EGFRm+ patients who received 1L osimertinib in the Canadian province of Alberta between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 150 patients receiving 1L osimertinib were identified. In total, 86 developed progressive disease, with 56 (65%) continuing systemic therapy, 73% continuing osimertinib, and 27% switching to second-line (2L) systemic therapy. Patients were similar both in clinical characteristics at 1L osimertinib initiation and patterns of treatment failure at progression; those continuing 1L osimertinib post-progression had a longer time to progression (13.5 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.05) and subsequent post-osimertinib initiation survival (34.7 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.11). Conclusions: The continuation of osimertinib post-progression is an effective disease management strategy for select real-world EGFRm+ patients, providing continued clinical benefit, potentially due to different underlying disease pathogenesis.

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

Outcomes of patients with advanced epithelial growth factor receptor mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib who would not have met the eligibility criteria for the FLAURA clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib is largely used as first-line therapy for metastatic epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancers based on the FLAURA clinical trial. Real-world patient outcomes often differ from clinical trial outcomes. This study evaluated the efficacy of first-line osimertinib in patients treated in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Furthermore, we compared the outcomes of patients who would and would not have been eligible for the original FLAURA trial.

METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving first-line osimertinib for metastatic EGFR exon19 or L858R lung cancer were identified using the BC Cancer Pharmacy Database. Patient eligibility for the FLAURA clinical trial were retrospectively reviewed based on the following criteria: ECOG ≥ 2, symptomatic brain metastases or on steroids, hemoglobin < 90 g/L, platelets < 100x109/L, or a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min. mOS was assessed for the entire population and compared between patients who would have been eligible and ineligible for FLAURA.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to October 2021, 311 patients received first-line osimertinib; 44 % (137/311) were deemed FLAURA ineligible, predominantly due to low ECOG (n = 120). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, the mOS for the entire cohort was 27.4 months (95 %CI 23.8-30.1). The mOS for ineligible patients was 18 months shorter than eligible patients (15.8 vs 34.2, p < 0.001). Ineligible patients had higher rates of de novo stage IV disease, higher rates of stage IVB disease, and more sites of disease than eligible patients.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world population, nearly half of patients would have been ineligible for FLAURA. The mOS was one year shorter than reported in FLAURA. However, patients who would have been eligible for the FLAURA clinical trial had similar OS to patients enrolled in FLAURA. Trial ineligible patients had a higher burden of disease at baseline which may have led to inferior outcomes. Further research is needed to improve outcomes in these patients.

Significant Prognostic Factor at Age Cut-off of 73 Years for Advanced Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma Patients: Insights from Real-World Study

Objective

The objective of this research was to determine the age cut-off for worse prognosis and investigate age-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in patients with advanced ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (AOSC).

Methods

In this research, we included a cohort of 20,846 patients diagnosed with AOSC, along with RNA-seq data from 374 patients in publicly available databases. Then we used the X-tile software to determine the age cut-off and stratified the patients into young and old groups. We utilized propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline between the young and old groups. Furthermore, we conducted an enrichment analysis of DEGs between the two age groups using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and gene ontology (GO) to identify dysregulated pathways. To evaluate the potential prognostic value of the DEGs, we performed survival analysis, such as Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log rank test.

Results

We stratified the patients into young group (n=16,336) and old group (n=4510) based on the cut-off age of 73 years by X-tile software. Age over 73 years was identified as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Next, we identified 436 DEGs and found that the neurotrophin signaling pathway and translation factor activity were associated with prognosis outcomes. Among the top 10 hub genes (RELA, NFKBIA, TRAF6, IRAK2, TAB3, AKT1, TBP, EIF2S2, MAPK10, and SUPT3H), RELA, TAB3, AKT1, TBP, and SUPT3H were found to be significantly associated with poor prognosis in old patients with AOSC.

Conclusion

Our study determined 73 years as the cutoff value for age in patients with AOSC. RELA, TAB3, AKT1, TBP, and SUPT3H were identified as age-related DEGs that could contribute to the poor prognosis of older patients with AOSC.

Exploring the impact of patient-specific clinical features on osimertinib effectiveness in a real-world cohort of patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Osimertinib is prescribed to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a sensitizing EGFR mutation. Limited data exists on the impact of patient characteristics or osimertinib exposure on effectiveness outcomes. This was a Dutch, multicenter cohort study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, with metastatic EGFRm+ NSCLC, receiving osimertinib. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed. In total, 294 patients were included. Primary EGFR-mutations were mainly exon 19 deletions (54%) and p.L858R point mutations (30%). Osimertinib was given in first-line (40%), second-line (46%) or beyond (14%), with median PFS 14.4 (95% CI: 9.4-19.3), 13.9 (95% CI: 11.3-16.1) and 8.7 months (95% CI: 4.6-12.7), respectively. Patients with low BMI (<20.0 kg/m2 ) had significantly shorter PFS/OS compared to all other subgroups. Patients with a high plasma trough concentration in steady state (Cmin,SS ; >271 ng/mL) had shorter PFS compared to a low Cmin,SS (<163 ng/mL; aHR 2.29; 95% CI: 1.13-4.63). A significant longer PFS was seen in females (aHR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.82) and patients with the exon 19 deletion (aHR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92). A trend towards longer PFS was seen for TP53 wild-type patients, while age did not impact PFS. Patients with a primary EGFR exon 19 deletion had longer PFS, while a low BMI, male sex and a high Cmin,SS were indicative for shorter PFS and/or OS. Age was not associated with effectiveness outcomes of osimertinib.

Effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatment may predict treatment response in further lines in stage III/IV patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate if therapeutic success in the first-line of anticancer treatments in patients with NSCLC may predict treatment success in the following lines.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of patients with NSCLC stage III/IV from the TULUNG registry separately for chemotherapy, TKIs, ALK inhibitors, and immunotherapy in the first line during the years 2011-2019. "Succesful treatment " was defined as PFS ≥ 6 months, a "good responder " was a patient with ˃50% of "successful treatment " lines. Treatment responses were analyzed separately for each drug group. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, Pearson Chi-Squared test, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

The first-line TKI therapy was successful in 66.2%, while good responders accounted for 50.7% of the cohort and their rates were similar for all types of TKIs. First-line platinum-based chemotherapy was successful in 43.1% and 48.6% for combinations with pemetrexed and bevacizumab, respectively. Good responders accounted for 29.5% and 25.9%, respectively. In the group of ALK inhibitors, we observed treatment success in 52.3% of cases, while alectinib showed the highest effectiveness (up to 70%). Good responders constituted 50% of the group. In the first-line immunotherapy group, survival benefit was observed in 52.3%, and good responders constituted 52.3% of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the treatment success in first-line therapies in patients with NSCLC may predict survival benefits in the subsequent lines, particularly in EGFR- or ALK-positive disease and immunotherapy-treated patients.

Pneumonitis in Patients Receiving Thoracic Radiotherapy and Osimertinib: A Multi-Institutional Study

Introduction

Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is increasingly used in patients receiving osimertinib for advanced NSCLC, and the risk of pneumonitis is not established. We investigated the risk of pneumonitis and potential risk factors in this population.

Methods

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients under active treatment with osimertinib who received TRT between April 2016 and July 2022 at two institutions. Clinical characteristics, including whether osimertinib was held during TRT and pneumonitis incidence and grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) were documented. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with grade 2 or higher (2+) pneumonitis.

Results

The median follow-up was 10.2 months (range: 1.9-53.2). Of 102 patients, 14 (13.7%) developed grade 2+ pneumonitis, with a median time to pneumonitis of 3.2 months (range: 1.5-6.3). Pneumonitis risk was not significantly increased in patients who continued osimertinib during TRT compared with patients who held osimertinib during TRT (9.1% versus 15.0%, p = 0.729). Three patients (2.9%) had grade 3 pneumonitis, none had grade 4, and two patients had grade 5 events (2.0%, diagnosed 3.2 mo and 4.4 mo post-TRT). Mean lung dose was associated with the development of grade 2+ pneumonitis in multivariate analysis (OR = 1.19, p = 0.021).

Conclusions

Although the overall rate of pneumonitis in patients receiving TRT and osimertinib was relatively low, there was a small risk of severe toxicity. The mean lung dose was associated with an increased risk of developing pneumonitis. These findings inform decision-making for patients and providers.

First-line osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The FLAURA trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with first-line osimertinib for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in a cohort treated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC between 11 March 2020 to 31 December 2021 who received first-line osimertinib in British Columbia, Canada were identified retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of osimertinib were plotted. The associations of baseline characteristics with PFS, and development of pneumonitis or dose reductions due to toxicity with OS were evaluated with hazard ratios estimated using univariable and multivariable Cox models.

Results

The cohort comprised 231 individuals. 58.7% of patients with de novo advanced NSCLC were initially diagnosed after presentation to the Emergency Room. At osimertinib initiation, 31.6% were aged ≥75 years and 45.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2. Median PFS and OS were 18.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.1-26.2] and 25.4 months (95% CI: 20.3-not reached), respectively. On multivariable analysis, age ≥75 years (vs. <75), ECOG PS 2/3 (vs. 0/1), ECOG PS 4 (vs. 0/1), current smokers (vs. never smokers), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% (vs. <1%), and L858R mutation (vs. exon 19 deletion) were associated with shorter PFS. Among 110 patients who progressed, 33.6% received subsequent therapy. A proportion of 16.5% of the cohort developed grade ≥3 adverse events. Pneumonitis from osimertinib (3.9% incidence) was weakly associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 2.59, 95% CI: 0.94-7.12, P=0.066); dose reductions were not associated with worse OS. 10.8% of patients developed COVID-19.

Conclusions

In a cohort receiving first-line osimertinib during the COVID-19 pandemic, ECOG PS ≥2 was observed in nearly half of patients at treatment initiation contributing to a median OS shorter than in FLAURA. The incidence of severe adverse events was low and dose reduction for drug toxicity did not impact OS. Identifying and reducing barriers to the diagnosis of NSCLC during the COVID-19 pandemic are required.

Genomic Landscape of Primary Resistance to Osimertinib Among Hispanic Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of an Observational Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) represent one of the most common genomic alterations identified among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several targeted agents for patients with EGFRm have been proven safe and effective, including the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib. Nonetheless, some patients will present with or develop EGFR-TKI resistance mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

We characterized the genomic landscape of primary resistance to osimertinib among Hispanic patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

An observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted with two groups of patients, those with intrinsic resistance (cohort A) and those with long-term survival (cohort B). All patients were treated and followed between January 2018 and May 2022. All patients were assessed for Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and Bcl-2-like protein 11 (BIM)/AXL mRNA expression before starting TKI. After 8 weeks of treatment, a liquid biopsy was performed to determine the presence of circulating free DNA (cfDNA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to identify mutations at the time of progression. In both cohorts, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

We found a homogeneous distribution of EGFR-sensitizing mutations in both cohorts. For cohort A, exon 21 mutations were more common than exon 19 deletions (ex19dels) for cohort B (P = 0.0001). The reported ORR for osimertinib was 6.3% and 100% for cohorts A and B, respectively (P = 0.0001). PFS was significantly higher in cohort B (27.4 months vs. 3.1 months; P = 0.0001) and ex19del patients versus L858R (24.5 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.2-NR), vs. 7.6 months, 95% CI 4.8-21.1; P = 0.001). OS was considerably lower for cohort A (20.1 months vs. 36.0 months; P = 0.0001) and was better for patients with ex19del, no brain metastasis, and low tumor mutation burden. At the time of progression, more mutations were found in cohort A, identifying off-target alterations more frequently, including TP53, RAS, and RB1.

CONCLUSION

EGFR-independent alterations are common among patients with primary resistance to osimertinib and significantly impact PFS and OS. Our results suggest that among Hispanic patients, other variables associated with intrinsic resistance include the number of commutations, high levels AXL mRNA, and low levels of BIM mRNA, T790M de novo, EGFR p.L858R presence, and a high tumoral mutational burden.

Results of the phase IIa study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation from a phase I/IIa study

BACKGROUND

Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This phase IIa study was part of a phase I/IIa study (NCT03386955), aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients received the first-line treatment of 180 mg rezivertinib orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

From Jun 12, 2019, to Oct 17, 2019, 43 patients were enrolled. At the data cutoff date on Dec 23, 2021, the ORR by BICR was 83.7% (95% CI: 69.3-93.2%). The median DoR was 19.3 (95% CI: 15.8-25.0) months. The median PFS by BICR was 20.7 (95% CI: 13.8-24.8) months and 22.0 (95% CI: 16.8-26.3) months by investigators. Data on OS was immature. Totally, 40 (93.0%) patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event while 4 (9.3%) of them were grade ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) showed promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile for the treatment among the locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation in the first-line setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03386955.

Variation in Use of Lung Cancer Targeted Therapies Across State Medicaid Programs, 2020-2021

Importance

Targeted therapies for EGFR (OMIM 131550)- and ALK (OMIM 105590)-altered metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) substantially improve outcomes for some patients. However, use of these therapies is lower among Medicaid patients, and access to oncology care varies across state Medicaid programs. Evidence is lacking on how use of targeted therapies for metastatic NSCLC varies across state Medicaid programs.

Objectives

To characterize state-level variation in the use of targeted therapies among Medicaid patients with metastatic NSCLC and to describe factors associated with this variation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Medicaid Drug Utilization Database from 2020 and 2021 and peer-reviewed data on NSCLC incidence, the prevalence of EGFR and ALK alterations, and expected treatment durations to estimate expected use of targeted therapies for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC in 33 states.

Exposures

State-specific Medicaid programs and state policies and characteristics.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the estimated proportion of person-time of Medicaid patients with EGFR- or ALK-altered NSCLC associated with receipt of targeted therapy in each state Medicaid program. Nested linear regression models examined associations between the observed variation and state policies and characteristics.

Results

There were an estimated 3461 person-years in which EGFR- and ALK-targeted therapies were indicated in 2020 and 2021. During these years, only 2281 person-years of EGFR- and ALK-targeted therapies were dispensed to Medicaid patients, suggesting that an estimated 66% of Medicaid patients with EGFR- and ALK-altered metastatic disease received indicated targeted therapies across all states. Rates of targeted therapy use ranged from 18% in Arkansas to 113% in Massachusetts; 30 of 33 states (91%) had lower rates of targeted therapy use than expected. The observed variation across state Medicaid programs was associated with Medicaid policies, the density of oncologists, and state gross domestic product per capita.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that rates of targeted therapy use among Medicaid patients with EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC were lower than expected and varied across state Medicaid programs. State policies and characteristics were associated with the observed variation, indicating where interventions could improve access to treatment and outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

Safety and efficacy of osimertinib rechallenge or continuation after pneumonitis: A multicentre retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Although osimertinib is a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, the incidence rate of pneumonitis associated with osimertinib is high. However, there are few reports about the safety and efficacy of osimertinib rechallenge after the development of pneumonitis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study of consecutive patients who developed pneumonitis associated with osimertinib as a first-line and received osimertinib rechallenge. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of any grade pneumonitis after osimertinib rechallenge. The secondary outcome was treatment efficacy in patients after osimertinib rechallenge.

RESULTS

In total, 33 patients who received osimertinib rechallenge were included. Of them, 26 patients had grade 1, 6 patients had grade 2, and 1 patient had grade 3 initial pneumonitis. The median follow-up period after the osimertinib rechallenge was 16.9 months (interquartile range, 11.1-21.3 months). After the start of osimertinib rechallenge, five patients (15%) experienced mild relapsed pneumonitis. Three of the five patients had similar imaging patterns for initial and relapsed pneumonitis. No significant differences in characteristics were observed between patients with and without relapsed pneumonitis. The median progression-free survival after osimertinib rechallenge was not achieved (95% confidence interval: 10.3 months - not reached).

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib rechallenge was feasible and effective for patients who developed initial pneumonitis associated with first-line osimertinib therapy. Osimertinib might be considered a treatment option even after the development of mild initial pneumonitis.

Real-World Study of Osimertinib in Korean Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although osimertinib is the standard-of-care treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, real-world evidence on the efficacy of osimertinib is not enough to reflect the complexity of the entire course of treatment. Herein, we report on the use of osimertinib in patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who had previously received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with confirmed EGFR T790M after disease progression of prior EGFR-TKI were enrolled and administered osimertinib 80 mg daily. The primary effectiveness outcome was progression-free survival, with time-to-treatment discontinuation, treatment and adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival being the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 558 individuals were enrolled, and 55.2% had investigator-assessed responses. The median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0 to 16.4), and the median time-to-treatment discontinuation was 15.0 months (95% CI, 14.1 to 15.9). The median overall survival was 36.7 months (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached). The benefit with osimertinib was consistent regardless of the age, sex, smoking history, and primary EGFR mutation subtype. However, hepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis, the presence of plasma EGFR T790M, and the shorter duration of prior EGFR-TKI treatment were poor predictors of osimertinib treatment. Ten patients (1.8%), including three with pneumonitis, had to discontinue osimertinib due to severe adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib demonstrated its clinical effectiveness and survival benefit for EGFR T790M mutation-positive in Korean patients with no new safety signals.

Real-world treatment patterns of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Several epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKI) have been approved for first-line (1L) treatment of EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in the United States (US). Real-world analyses of 1L treatment patterns with EGFR TKIs, including the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib which was most recently approved in 2018, are still sparse.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used data from IQVIA's prescription claims (LRx) and medical claims (Dx) databases. mNSCLC patients newly treated with any EGFR TKI in the 1L setting were identified from January 1, 2015 to April 30, 2020; the first date of EGFR TKI (third-generation osimertinib, first-generation [erlotinib, gefitinib], or second-generation [afatinib, dacomitinib]) was the index date. Treatment patterns were reported in the cohorts stratified by 1L EGFR TKI.

RESULTS

A total of 2505 patients were included in the study (982 osimertinib, 1060 first-generation, and 463 second-generation EGFR TKI). Beginning in 2018, osimertinib became the most common 1L EGFR TKI (66.7%) and in early 2020, it accounted for 90.6% of 1L EGFR TKIs. Nearly all patients (>97%) were treated with 1L EGFR TKI monotherapy. Patients with 1L osimertinib had longer treatment duration compared to patients with 1L first- or second-generation EGFR TKI (median months: 17.8 vs. 8.7 vs. 10.5, respectively; log-rank test for comparisons with osimertinib p < 0.0001) over median follow-up times of 9.8, 20.5, and 19.3 months. 32.5% and 36.3% of the first- and second-generation EGFR TKI cohorts, respectively, had evidence of 2L treatment. Osimertinib monotherapy accounted for the majority of 2L treatments (58.3%/60.7%) and 11.3%/8.9% had 2L chemotherapy or immuno-oncology therapy following 1L first- or second-generation EGFR TKI.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study of a US claims database, 1L treatment duration was longer with osimertinib compared with other EGFR TKIs. Future studies with longer follow-up are recommended to understand treatment patterns after progression on EGFR TKIs.

Retrospective analysis of independent predictors of progression‐free survival in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer receiving first‐line osimertinib

Background

Clinically measurable factors affecting the progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients receiving osimertinib as first‐line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not yet been established.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients treated with osimertinib as primary therapy for EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC at Yokohama City University Medical Center between August 2018 and March 2022. Our objective was to identify the independent predictors of PFS.

Results

The median age of participants was 74 years. Overall, 73.8% had good (0–1) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), and 98.4% had histology of adenocarcinoma. The EGFR mutation was exon19 deletion in 52.5% and exon21 L858R in 44.3% of patients. Programmed death‐ligand 1 tumor proportion score >50% was observed in 21.3% and liver metastasis in 9.9% of patients. Median PFS was 19.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–31.6), and overall survival was not reached. The objective response rate was 68.9%, and disease control rate was 93.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that poor PS (2–4) negatively impacted PFS (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% CI: 1.46–9.87; p = 0.006). Median PFS in the good PS and poor PS groups was 20.4 months (95% CI: 12.4‐not evaluable) and 7.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–19.5), respectively. Interstitial lung disease of all grades and grade 3 was observed as an adverse event in 6.6 and 4.9% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Poor PS was associated with poor prognosis in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first‐line therapy.

Real-World Testing Practices, Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients from Central Eastern Europe with EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review Study (REFLECT)

The targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) changed the treatment paradigm. REFLECT study (NCT04031898) explored EGFR/T790M testing and treatment patterns in EGFRm NSCLC patients receiving first- or second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR TKIs as front-line (1L) in eight countries. Pooled data from Central Eastern Europe (CEE) countries from this study (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia) are presented here. This physician-led chart review study was conducted in patients with confirmed-EGFRm NSCLC initiating 1L 1G/2G EGFR TKIs between 2015–2018. The CEE cohort included 389 patients receiving 1L erlotinib (37%), afatinib (34%), and gefitinib (29%). Overall, 320 (82%) patients discontinued 1L, and 298 (77%) progression events were registered. Median progression free survival on 1L TKIs was 14.0 (95% CI: 12.6–15.6) months. Median overall survival from 1L start was 26.6 (95% CI: 24.1–29.0) months. Attrition rate between 1L and next line was 30%. Among patients with 1L progression, 200 (67%) were tested for T790M and 58% were positive. This first CEE analysis of treatments and outcomes in EGFRm NSCLC patients highlights the importance of using the most efficacious therapies currently available in 1L to reduce attrition and improve patient outcomes.

Diagnostic-Therapeutic Pathway and Outcomes of Early Stage NSCLC: a Focus on EGFR Testing in the Real-World

Background

Osimertinib is considered the standard-of-care for previously-untreated EGFR mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oncogene driver screening in early NSCLC is not standard practice. A real-world study has been designed in order to investigate the optimal testing frequency and timing for EGFR mutations in early NSCLC in clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

The present observational, retrospective study evaluated the real-world diagnostic-therapeutic pathway and clinical outcomes of 225 patients with stage I-III NSCLC, with particular reference to the EGFR-mutant subgroup.

Results

Prior to surgery, 101 patients had undergone a diagnostic biopsy; EGFR mutational analysis was available in 56 (55%) patients and 12 patients (21%) had a cancer harboring an EGFR mutation. Among surgical specimens, reflex EGFR test was performed in 181 (80%) of 225 and 35 cases (19%) were EGFR mutant. The majority of patients had not received adjuvant chemotherapy (N=174, 77%) or adjuvant radiotherapy (N=201, 89%). Of 49 (22%) patients experiencing disease relapse, 26 (53%) received first-line systemic treatment. All EGFR-mutant relapsed patients (N=6, 12.2%) received an EGFR-TKI. Median overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival for the entire population were not reached. Multivariate analysis for OS confirmed a significant correlation with age, female gender, EGFR status, necrosis score, perineural invasion, and relapsed disease. EGFR test costs represented 1.6-2.4% of the total costs of management per patient (€34,340).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the frequency of EGFR mutations in early stage (I-III) NSCLC is similar to that of advanced stages. Reflex EGFR testing in all early-stage NSCLC at diagnosis or after surgery appears to be a valid tool to give patients the chance to benefit from targeted adjuvant treatment.

Systemic Therapy for Oligoprogression in Patients with Metastatic NSCLC Harboring Activating EGFR Mutations

After a variable period of activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment, patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations develop resistance to these TKIs. In some cases, an oligoprogression is diagnosed, and its management is still controversial. The oligoprogression represents an intermediate stage of metastatic NSCLC between localized and widely disseminated disease, and is characterized by a limited number and/or sites of metastases in which a disease progression appears, together with a more indolent tumor biology. Currently, the management of oligoprogressed NSCLC involves local treatment, including radiotherapy and/or surgery, to control the progressive lesions. Systemic therapy should also be a potential approach to boost the activity of EGFR-TKIs. However, considering the lack of large trials addressing this topic, the optimal therapeutic strategies remain undefined and should be evaluated on an individualized basis. In this paper, we review the most relevant scientific evidence of continuing the systemic therapy with the same EGFR-TKI for the management of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and oligoprogressed to first-line EGFR-TKIs, also discussing the controversies and potential future directions.

Integration of rapid PCR testing as an adjunct to NGS in diagnostic pathology services within the UK: evidence from a case series of non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with follow-up

AIMS

Somatic genetic testing in non-squamous, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients is required to highlight subgroups eligible for a number of novel oncological therapies. This study aims to determine whether turnaround times for reporting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) alone is sufficient to meet the needs of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series with follow-up. Outcomes of EGFR testing (102 tests) in 96 patients by NGS were compared with a rapid, fully automated PCR-based platform (Idylla) in local histopathology laboratories.

RESULTS

Turnaround time for reporting NGS was 17 calendar days. Reporting using the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test, by contrast, gave a potential turnaround time of 3.8 days from request to authorisation. Three-quarters of patients presenting with stage IV disease had a performance status of 0, 1, or 2 but 18% experienced rapid clinical deterioration (p<0.05). A third of these patients were deceased by the time NGS reports were available.

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss issues around integrating rapid PCR testing alongside NGS in multidisciplinary care pathways and strategies for mitigating against foreseeable difficulties. Dual testing for stage IV non-squamous, NSCLC patients has the potential to improve care and survival outcomes by providing access to the right test at the right time.