Parathyroid hormone-related protein antigen localization distinguishes between mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung

Use of mesothelin as a marker for mesothelial cells in cytologic specimens

Immunocytochemistry is often employed for the distinction between mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma. Mesothelin has recently been reported to be expressed in reactive mesothelial cells and epithelioid mesotheliomas. The objective of this study is to determine the utility of mesothelin as marker for mesothelial cells in cytologic preparations. Thirty cell blocks were retrieved from the archives and immunostained with monoclonal antibody directed against mesothelin and calretinin. Heat-induced epitope retrieval technique was employed, and the immunostaining was accomplished using an automated stainer. These tissue blocks were from 35 patients (17 females and 18 males) with a median age of 64 years. Nine were benign effusions, 11 mesotheliomas, and 18 metastatic adenocarcinomas. The presence of any immunoreactivity, irrespective of level of intensity or percentage of cells, was considered positive for mesothelin expression. Follow up included correlation with pathology materials obtained at surgery and review of medical records. Mesothelin staining was positive in 7/9 benign cases, 8/11 mesotheliomas, and 8/18 adenocarcinomas. The difference of mesothelin expression between mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma was statistically significant. For calretinin, all cases, except 2 malignant mesotheliomas and 3 adenocarcinomas, showed positive staining with calretinin. As a marker for mesothelial cells, the sensitivity and specificity of mesothelin were 73% and 55%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of calretinin were 95% and 86%, respectively. Therefore, mesothelin is not a sensitive or a specific marker for mesothelial cells in cytologic specimens when compared with calretinin.

Serous effusions: diagnosis of malignancy beyond cytomorphology. An analytic review

In this brief review, the role of various ancillary techniques to detect malignancy in effusion fluid are evaluated and discussed. The data were collected from a large number of research articles published in various medical journals. The role of these techniques to increase the diagnostic accuracy in serous effusions is emphasised.

Use of a panel of markers in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in fluid cytology

To evaluate the use of a panel of markers to differentiate adenocarcinoma and the reactive/inflammatory process in fluid cytology, we stained 29 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks of effusion fluid from patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma and 24 cell blocks from patients with benign effusion with mucicarmine and antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), B72.3, and calretinin. Positive staining with CEA, B72.3, and mucicarmine was seen in 22 (76%), 20 (69%), and 18 (62%) adenocarcinoma cases, respectively. All except 1 adenocarcinoma was negative for calretinin. No benign cases were positive for B72.3 and mucicarmine. In 1 benign case, scattered epithelial cells demonstrated weak positivity for CEA. The majority of combinations were 100% specific for adenocarcinoma. The highest sensitivity (86%) for adenocarcinomas was achieved with the staining combination of negative for calretinin and positive for any adenocarcinoma marker (CEA, B72.3, or mucicarmine). The use of a panel of markers that recognize adenocarcinoma and mesothelial cells is useful in the differential diagnosis between metastatic adenocarcinoma and the reactive/inflammatory process. The profile of positive staining with at least one of the adenocarcinoma markers and negative calretinin staining is highly specific and sensitive for identifying adenocarcinoma in fluid cytology.

Immunohistochemical differential diagnosis of pleural effusions, with emphasis on malignant mesothelioma

The immunohistochemical diagnosis of atypical epithelial proliferations in pleural fluid is a challenging topic in cytopathology and surgical pathology. Mesothelioma may be simulated clinically and radiologically by several other nonneoplastic and neoplastic disorders, mandating that strict histologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural guidelines be followed for its diagnosis. Because of its availability to most laboratories, immunohistochemistry has emerged as the most commonly used procedure for the diagnosis of pleural malignancies. This review considers the current status of that investigative modality, with particular attention to lesions that are suspected to be mesothelial.

Immunohistochemical panels for differentiating epithelial malignant mesothelioma from lung adenocarcinoma: a study with logistic regression analysis

Immunohistochemistry provides an important indicator for differential diagnosis between pleural malignant mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma, which have complex therapeutic and medicolegal implications. To pinpoint a reliable, restricted panel of markers, the authors evaluated the efficacy of select commercial antibodies in a series of patients with confirmed clinicopathologic diagnosis of mesothelioma or lung adenocarcinoma with the aid of multiple logistic classification tables. Specimens of 46 mesotheliomas and 20 lung adenocarcinomas were examined with calretinin, thrombomodulin, cytokeratins (CKs) 5/6, and high-molecular weight CKs (indicators of mesothelioma), alongside MOC 31, Ber-EP4, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; indicators of lung adenocarcinoma). Of the mesotheliomas, 40 of 46 (87%) were positive with calretinin, 29 of 46 (63%) with thrombomodulin, 40 of 46 (87%) with CKs 5/6, and 41 of 46 (89%) with high-weight CKs; five of 46 mesotheliomas (11%) were focally reactive with MOC 31, four of 46 (9%) with Ber-EP4, and two of 46 (4%) with CEA. Of the lung adenocarcinomas, 18 of 20 (90%) were positive with MOC 31, 20 of 20 (100%) with Ber-EP4, and 17 of 20 (85%) with CEA; and two of 20 (10%) were focally reactive with calretinin, one of 20 (5%) with thrombomodulin, none of 20 (0%) with CKs 5/6, and five of 20 (25%) with high-weight CKs. Multiple logistic modeling indicated two batteries of three antibodies permitting more than 98% overall accuracy: Ber-EP4 plus CKs 5/6 plus calretinin, and Ber-EP4 plus CKs 5/6 plus CEA.

Calretinin staining pattern aids in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions

BACKGROUND

The differentiation between malignant mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma based on morphology alone can be a diagnostic challenge. The majority of the available antibodies recognize molecules expressed by adenocarcinoma whereas to the authors' knowledge specific markers for mesothelial cells are lacking. Calretinin, a calcium-binding protein, has been reported to be a selective marker for mesothelioma and largely is absent from adenocarcinoma on histologic material. The results with cytologic preparations have been inconsistent.

METHODS

To evaluate the specificity of calretinin in differentiating mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in cytologic preparations, 21 paraffin embedded cells blocks of serous effusions from 15 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma and 16 cell blocks from 9 patients with malignant mesothelioma were stained with a monoclonal antibody against calretinin. The immunoreactivity was evaluated blindly by two observers. Positive staining was defined as nuclear and cytoplasmic staining with or without intense membranous decoration. The former resulted in a characteristic "fried egg" appearance.

RESULTS

Calretinin staining was positive in all but 2 cases of mesothelioma (14 of 16 cases; 87.5%). The latter contained predominantly spindle-shaped neoplastic mesothelial cells in the cell block preparations. All adenocarcinoma specimens were classified as negative for calretinin staining; 9 (42.9%) lacked any immunoreactivity and 12 (57.1%) showed weak, sparse, coarse, granular cytoplasmic staining without nuclear or membranous staining. Benign reactive mesothelial cells, when observed in association with adenocarcinoma, also showed the characteristic "fried egg" appearance. The difference in the staining pattern of calretinin between cells of mesothelial origin and adenocarcinoma cells was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Calretinin is a useful marker in differentiating mesothelioma of the epithelial type from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions. The "fried-egg" appearance or cytoplasmic and nuclear staining pattern is characteristic of cells of mesothelial origin.

Calretinin: a novel immunocytochemical marker for mesothelioma

Immunohistochemistry is a powerful diagnostic adjunct in the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma (especially of the epithelial type) and adenocarcinoma metastatic to the serous membranes. Most of the immunological probes commonly used, however, recognize antigens expressed by the epithelial malignancies and absent from mesothelial cells and mesotheliomas. Probes suitable for the positive identification of mesotheliomas are comparatively scarce and much less commonly used because of their reduced sensitivity and specificity, their unsuitability for staining routinely fixed and embedded tissues, or their lack of commercial availability. We now document that two different polyclonal antisera to calretinin consistently immunostain mesothelial cells and malignant mesotheliomas both in routinely fixed and embedded tissue sections and in cytological preparations of serous effusions. The diagnostic sensitivity of this novel immunocytochemical approach reached 100%, allowing immunostaining of all 44 mesotheliomas investigated, which included five biphasic and three sarcomatoid types. The specificity of calretinin immunoreactivity was checked against 294 adenocarcinomas of different origin (19 serosal metastases and 275 primary tumors potentially able to metastatize to serosal membranes) relevant for the discussion of the differential diagnosis with malignant mesothelioma: only 28 cases showed focal immunoreactivity for calretinin. We conclude that calretinin is a most useful marker for the positive identification of malignant mesotheliomas.

Distribution and functions of parathyroid hormone-related protein in vertebrate cells

Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) was isolated from tumors and identified as the agent of humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM) in 1987. Since then its gene structure in several mammalian and an avian species has been analyzed and its gene expression demonstrated in many adult and embryonic tissues derived from all three germ layers. The composition and structure of PTHrP peptide depends on both differential gene splicing and posttranslational processing, which result in a range of peptides of potentially diverse functions. This chapter describes the distribution of PTHrP in both normal and neoplastic adult and embryonic tissues. PTHrP is of fundamental importance to cell survival because the absence of the gene is fatal; this aspect of PTHrP function in cell physiology becomes overwhelmingly important in neoplasia. Intracrine or paracrine actions for PTHrP seem to be most likely in mammalian and avian physiology, but in fishes high circulating levels suggest classic endocrine functions as well. Much remains to be learned of the biology of this fascinating protein.