Polymorphism of angiotensin converting enzyme is associated with severe circulatory compromise in febrile neutropenic children with cancer

An updated meta-analysis on association between angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism and cancer risk

The Alu repetitive sequence insertion/deletion (I/D, rs4646994) polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene may alter cancer susceptibility, but results of current studies are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between the ACE I/D polymorphism and cancer risk, we performed an updated meta-analysis of all eligible studies. All studies published up to July 2013 concerning the association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and cancer risk were identified by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, CNKI, and Cqvip databases. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the fixed/random-effects model in Review Manager 5.1 and STATA 12.0. A total of 46 case-control studies including 7,025 cases and 34,911 controls were identified and evaluated. Overall, we did not observe a direct association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and general cancer risk (DD + DI vs. II OR = 0.95, 95 %CI = 0.84-1.07, P = 0.40). In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, a significant increased susceptibility of prostate cancer was found for variant homozygotes (DD vs. II + ID OR = 2.15, 95 %CI = 1.01-4.55, P = 0.05). Additionally, no significant association was observed in other subgroup analyses according to ethnicity, control source, sample size and quality control of genotyping. In summary, our results suggested that the ACE I/D polymorphism might not be a common risk factor for overall cancer susceptibility, but might contribute to the susceptibility of prostate cancer. More studies with larger sample sizes are required in the future.

The insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Background

The insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been implicated in susceptibility to cancer, but a large number of studies have reported inconclusive results. The aim of this study is to assess the association between the I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and cancer risk by meta-analysis.

Methods

A search was performed in Pubmed database, Embase database, Chinese Biomedical (CBM) database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database and Weipu database, covering all studies until August 31, 2010. Statistical analysis was performed by using Revman4.2 and STATA 10.0.

Results

A total of 25 case-control studies comprising 3914 cancer patients and 11391 controls were identified. No significant association was found between the I/D polymorphism and over all cancer risks (OR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.73-1.06, P = 0.17 for DD+DI vs. II). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association was found among Asians and Europeans for the comparison of DD+DI vs. II. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, no significant associations were found among lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer for the comparison of DD+DI vs. II. Results from other comparative genetic models also indicated the lack of associations between this polymorphism and cancer risks.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggested that the ACE D/I polymorphism might not contribute to the risk of cancer.

Current approaches for risk stratification of infectious complications in pediatric oncology

Infections are serious complications of cytoreductive therapy in pediatric cancer patients presenting with febrile neutropenia. It is standard of care to initiate empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics until the fever and neutropenia resolve. However, it might be effective and safe to allow for early hospital discharge in certain subgroups of patients. Two strategies for risk stratification of pediatric cancer patients with regard to infectious complications are discussed in this review: (1) clinical risk parameters and laboratory measures to assist therapeutic management at presentation with fever in neutropenia, and (2) investigations of individual genetic susceptibility factors to tailor potential prophylactic approaches. Given the data available from a significant number of small studies, a large prospective non-inferiority trial is essential to assess low-risk clinical factors and additional laboratory or genetic markers for their predictive value.