Temozolomide in resistant or relapsed pediatric solid tumors

Vincristine, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma

Purpose

The combination of irinotecan, temozolomide and vincristine has been proposed as an effective salvage regimen for some pediatric malignancies. Thus, we sought to evaluate this combination for patients with relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma (NB).

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective study, forty-six patients with relapsed or refractory NB were treated with the combination of vincristine (1.5 mg/m² i.v. day 1), irinotecan (50 mg/m²/day i.v. days 1–5) and temozolomide (100 mg/m²/day p.o. days 1–5) (VIT) during the period 2011–2019. All toxicities were documented.

Results

A total of 251 cycles (median 6 cycles/patient) were administered. A complete response (CR) was achieved in 5 patients, partial response (PR) in 27 patients, stable disease (SD) in 8 patients, and progression disease (PD) in 6 patients, with an overall objective response rate (CR+PR) of 69.6%. Eighteen patients developed diarrhea with Grade 3 or less. Grade 1-2 hematologic toxicity occurred in 10 patients. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity developed in 32 patients. VIT was an effective regimen for different metastatic sites. UGT1A*28 genotyping performed in 7 patients revealed wild type. Diarrhea occurred in 4 of them.

Conclusion

The shorter, 5-day VIT regimen is an active and well-tolerated salvage regimen in relapse/refractory NB.

Systematic Review of Recurrent Osteosarcoma Systemic Therapy

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary bone cancer, mainly affecting those of young ages. Although surgery combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy has significantly increased the chances of cure, recurrent and refractory disease still impose a tough therapeutic challenge. We performed a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence, regarding treatment of recurrent and/or refractory osteosarcoma over the last two decades. Among the 72 eligible studies, there were 56 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase I or II and non-randomized. Evaluated treatment strategies included cytotoxic chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase and mTOR inhibitors and other targeted agents, as well as immunotherapy and combinatorial approaches. Unfortunately, most treatments have failed to induce objective responses, albeit some of them may sustain disease control. No driver mutations have been recognized, to serve as effective treatment targets, and predictive biomarkers of potential treatment effectiveness are lacking. Hopefully, ongoing and future clinical and preclinical research will unlock the underlying biologic mechanisms of recurrent and refractory osteosarcoma, expanding the therapeutic choices available to pre-treated osteosarcoma patients.

Temozolomide and etoposide combination for the treatment of relapsed osteosarcoma

The prognosis of patients with relapsed osteosarcoma is extremely poor and the optimal treatment remains to be identified. Here, we retrospectively analysed the clinical outcomes of nine patients with relapsed osteosarcoma treated with temozolomide/etoposide. Of the two patients who received temozolomide/etoposide as palliative therapy for unresectable tumours, one remained alive with stable disease for >4 years. The remaining seven patients received temozolomide/etoposide as adjuvant therapy following resection of relapsed metastatic disease; of these, one was free from disease for 41 months. Potentially beneficial effects were observed in two of three O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protein-negative patients, whereas all five O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-positive patients experienced subsequent relapse. None of the patients experienced severe adverse effects requiring hospitalization. Temozolomide/etoposide is a feasible candidate as salvage therapy for relapsed osteosarcoma. Further studies are needed to verify the utility of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protein expression as a biomarker for predicting the response to this treatment.

Phase II study of temozolomide and topotecan (TOTEM) in children with relapsed or refractory extracranial and central nervous system tumors including medulloblastoma with post hoc Bayesian analysis: A European ITCC study

AIM

To assess objective response after two cycles of temozolomide and topotecan (TOTEM) in children with refractory or relapsed miscellaneous extracranial solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumors, including medulloblastoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET).

PROCEDURE

Multicenter, nonrandomized, phase 2 basket trial including children with solid tumors, completed by a one-stage design confirmatory cohort for medulloblastoma, and an exploratory cohort for PNET. Main eligibility criteria were refractory/relapsed measurable disease and no more than two prior treatment lines. Temozolomide was administered orally at 150 mg/m² /day followed by topotecan at 0.75 mg/m² /day intravenously for five consecutive days every 28 days. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles according to WHO criteria and reviewed independently.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled and treated in the miscellaneous solid tumor and 33 in the CNS strata; 20 patients with medulloblastoma and six with PNET were included in the expansion cohorts. The median age at inclusion was 10.0 years (range, 0.9-20.9). In the basket cohorts, confirmed complete and partial responses were observed in one glioma, four medulloblastoma, and one PNET, leading to the extension. The overall objective response rate (ORR) in medulloblastoma was 28% (95% CI, 12.7-47.2) with 1/29 complete and 7/29 partial responses, those for PNET 10% (95% CI, 0.3-44.5). Post hoc Bayesian analysis estimates that the true ORR in medulloblastoma is probably between 20% and 30% and below 20% in PNET. The most common treatment-related toxicities of the combination therapy were hematologic.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide-topotecan results in significant ORR in children with recurrent and refractory medulloblastoma with a favorable toxicity profile.

Salvage Therapy for Childhood Medulloblastoma: A Single Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Children diagnosed with medulloblastoma (MB) who are refractory to upfront therapy or experience recurrence have very poor prognoses. Although phase I and phase II trials exist, these treatments bear significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children diagnosed with a recurrence of MB from 2002 to 2015 at McMaster University was undertaken.

RESULTS

Recurrent disease in 10 patients involved leptomeningeal dissemination, with 3 experiencing local recurrence. In three recurrent patients the disease significantly progressed, and the children were palliated. The remaining 10 children underwent some form of salvage therapy, including surgical re-resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, either in isolation or in varying combinations. Of the 13 children experiencing treatment-refractory or recurrent disease, 4 are currently alive with a median follow-up of 38.5 months (75.5 months). Of the eight patients with molecular subgrouping data, none of the Wnt MB experienced recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent MB carried a poor prognosis with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 18.2% despite the administration of salvage therapy. The upfront therapy received, available treatment, and tolerability of the proposed salvage therapy resulted in significant heterogeneity in the treatment of our recurrent cohort.

Preclinical evaluation of the first intravenous small molecule MDM2 antagonist alone and in combination with temozolomide in neuroblastoma

High‐risk neuroblastoma, a predominantly TP53 wild‐type (wt) tumour, is incurable in >50% patients supporting the use of MDM2 antagonists as novel therapeutics. Idasanutlin (RG7388) shows in vitro synergy with chemotherapies used to treat neuroblastoma. This is the first study to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of the intravenous idasanutlin prodrug, RO6839921 (RG7775), both alone and in combination with temozolomide in TP53 wt orthotopic neuroblastoma models. Detection of active idasanutlin using liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry and p53 pathway activation by ELISA assays and Western analysis showed peak plasma levels 1 h post‐treatment with maximal p53 pathway activation 3–6 h post‐treatment. RO6839921 and temozolomide, alone or in combination in mice implanted with TP53 wt SHSY5Y‐Luc and NB1691‐Luc cells showed that combined RO6839921 and temozolomide led to greater tumour growth inhibition and increase in survival compared to vehicle control. Overall, RO6839921 had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile consistent with intermittent dosing and was well tolerated alone and in combination. These preclinical studies support the further development of idasanutlin in combination with temozolomide in neuroblastoma in early phase clinical trials.

What's new?

Long‐term survival of high‐risk neuroblastoma patients currently averages than 50%. New therapies that both improve survival and reduce treatment toxicity are urgently needed. MDM2 antagonists are a novel class of anti‐cancer agents that stabilize the p53 pathway and lead to tumour suppression. In this preclinical study, the authors tested a prodrug of the MDM2 inhibitor idasanutlin in mice. They found that this compound inhibited tumour growth and increased survival, especially in combination with temozolomide. These results support the further development of idasanutlin plus temozolomide in clinical trials for neuroblastoma.

Irinotecan and temozolomide in recurrent Ewing sarcoma: an analysis in 51 adult and pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Data on temozolomide (TEM) and irinotecan (IRI) activity in recurrent Ewing sarcoma (EWS), especially in adult patients, are limited.

METHODS

Patients receiving TEM 100 mg/m²/day oral, and IRI 40 mg/m²/day intravenous, days 1-5, every 21 days, were included in this multi-institutional retrospective study. Disease control rate (DCR) [overall response rate (ORR) [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] + stable disease (SD)], 6-months progression-free survival (6-mos PFS) and 1-year overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

The median age of the 51 patients was 21 years (range 3-65 years): 34 patients (66%) were adults (≥18 years of age), 24 (48%) had ECOG 1 and 35 (69%) were presented with multiple site recurrence. TEMIRI was used at first relapse/progression in 13 (25%) patients, while the remainder received TEMIRI for second or greater relapse/progression. Fourteen (27%) patients had received prior myeloablative therapy with busulfan and melphalan. We observed five (10%) CR, 12 (24%) PR and 19 (37%) SD, with a DCR of 71%. 6-mos PFS was 49% (95% CI 35-63) and it was significantly influenced by ECOG (6-mos PFS 64% [95% CI 45-83] for ECOG 0, 34% [95% CI 14-54] for ECOG ≥1; p = .006) and LDH (6-mos PFS 62% [95% CI 44-79] for normal LDH, 22% [95% CI 3-42] for high LDH; p = .02), with no difference according to line of treatment, age and metastatic pattern. One-year OS was 55% (95% CI 39-70), with RECIST response (p = .001) and ECOG (p = .0002) independently associated with outcome. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity included neutropenia in 12% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 4%, diarrhea in 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This series confirms the activity of TEMIRI in both adults and pediatric patients. This schedule offers a 71% DCR, independently of the line of chemotherapy. Predictive factors of response are ECOG and LDH.

VIncristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide in children and adolescents with relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide (VIT) is often used to treat children and adolescents with relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS); however, the outcome of these patients has not been previously described.

PROCEDURES

We sought to determine the response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed RMS treated with VIT by retrospective review of patients treated at five tertiary care hospitals. Prior treatment with irinotecan was permitted.

RESULTS

Among 19 patients with a median age of 8 years (range 2-17 years), 12 (63%) were males and 12 (63%) had embryonal histology. Median time to relapse from initial diagnosis was 16 months (range 2.8-45 months). VIT was used as first, second, third, or fourth line of therapy in four (21%), seven (37%), six (32%), and two (10%) patients, respectively. Four patients received VIT as adjuvant therapy following radiation and/or surgery. Therefore, among 15 evaluable patients, the best response to VIT was 0 (complete response, CR), 0 (partial response, PR), 4 (stable disease, SD), and 11 (progressive disease, PD) for an overall clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) of 26.7% (95% CI: 7.8-55.1%). After a median follow-up of 8 months, 2 (10%) patients were alive without disease, 3 (16%) were alive with disease, and 14 (74%) patients died of PD. PFS at 3 months was 23% (95% CI: 5.7-46.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

VIT therapy in combination with adequate local control is associated with some disease control in patients with first relapse RMS and may be another reasonable option to offer patients as salvage therapy.

Survival outcomes in pediatric recurrent high-grade glioma: results of a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis

Recurrent pediatric high-grade glioma is a leading cause of cancer-related death in children. We report results of a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating survival outcome in pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma over the last 20 years. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Review databases were searched for relevant studies reporting on survival outcomes for pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma treated between 1996 and 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated cumulatively over all studies, by therapy subgroup, and by decade of treatment. Random effects models were used to control for heterogeneity as measured by the I² statistic. A total of 17 studies across 4 treatment strategies were included. Eleven investigated traditional chemotherapy, 1 investigated targeted therapy, 3 investigated immunotherapy, and 2 investigated radiotherapy. A total of 129 patients were included with a median age of 10.0 years. Cumulative PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI 2.1-5.0). Cumulative OS was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.9-7.3). OS was 4.0 months (95% CI 1.9-6.1) using traditional chemotherapy, 9.3 months using targeted therapies (95% CI 5.4-13), 6.9 months using immunotherapy (95% CI 2.1-12), and 14 months using reirradiation (95% CI 2.8-25). OS between 1996 and 2006 was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.1-6.2) compared to 8.5 months (95% CI 5.6-11) after 2006. Pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma suffer from poor PFS and OS, regardless of therapy. There may be a trend towards improved OS in the last decade.

Docetaxel, bevacizumab, and gemcitabine for very high risk sarcomas in adolescents and young adults: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with very high risk sarcomas have poor outcomes and are in need of novel therapies.

PROCEDURE

From January 2005 to February 2016, we retrospectively identified all AYA patients with relapsed or metastatic high-grade sarcomas, who were treated with at least one cycle of docetaxel (T), bevacizumab (A), and gemcitabine (G) (TAG ; T = 100 mg/m² Day 8, A = 15 mg/kg Day 1, G = 1,000 mg/m² Days 1 and 8).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients, median age of 20 (15-30), received a total of 80 cycles of TAG, and were followed for a median of 83 months. Diagnosis included osteosarcoma (OST; 8), Ewing sarcoma (3), and soft tissue sarcoma (3). Five of 14 patients achieved clinical remission (CR), 3 had partial responses (PR), 3 had stable disease (SD), and 3 had progressive disease (PD). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7 and 19 months, respectively. The objective response rate (CR + PR) and tumor control rate (CR + PR + SD) were 57% and 79%, respectively, with two patients alive after 5 years; toxicities included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and capillary leak syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study builds on previous studies utilizing TAG in adult leiomyosarcoma (LMS) by focusing on AYA, non-LMS sarcomas, especially OST. Our experience suggests that TAG is well tolerated and has activity in very high risk sarcomas in AYA.

Phase I study of temozolomide in combination with thiotepa and carboplatin with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue in patients with malignant brain tumors with minimal residual disease

Recurrence of malignant brain tumors results in a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (AHCR) has been used in patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors and has shown improved outcomes compared with standard chemotherapy. Temozolomide is standard therapy for glioblastoma and has also shown activity in patients with medulloblastoma/primitive neuro-ectodermal tumor (PNET), particularly those with recurrent disease. Temozolomide was administered twice daily on days -10 to -6, followed by thiotepa 300 mg/m(2) per day and carboplatin dosed using the Calvert formula or body surface area on days -5 to -3, with AHCR day 0. Twenty-seven patients aged 3-46 years were enrolled. Diagnoses included high-grade glioma (n=12); medulloblastoma/PNET (n=9); central nervous system (CNS) germ cell tumor (n=4); ependymoma (n=1) and spinal cord PNET (n=1). Temozolomide doses ranged from 100 mg/m(2) per day to 400 mg/m(2) per day. There were no toxic deaths. Prolonged survival was noted in several patients including those with recurrent high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma and CNS germ cell tumor. Increased doses of temozolomide are feasible with AHCR. A phase II study using temozolomide, carboplatin and thiotepa with AHCR for children with recurrent malignant brain tumors is being conducted through the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium.

Temozolomide Treatment for Pediatric Refractory Anaplastic Ependymoma with Low MGMT Protein Expression

The benefit of postoperative chemotherapy for anaplastic ependymoma remains unknown. We report two pediatric patients with refractory anaplastic ependymoma treated with temozolomide (TMZ). We did not detect O(6) -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in tumor samples; however, MGMT protein expression was low. With TMZ treatment, one patient had a 7-month complete remission; the other, stable disease for 15 months. Three other patients did not respond to TMZ; two had high and one low MGMT expression, and two showed no MGMT promoter methylation. These findings suggest that TMZ may be effective for pediatric refractory anaplastic ependymoma with low MGMT protein expression.

Connexin 43 Inhibition Sensitizes Chemoresistant Glioblastoma Cells to Temozolomide

Resistance of glioblastoma (GBM) to the front-line chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ) continues to challenge GBM treatment efforts. The repair of TMZ-induced DNA damage by O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) confers one mechanism of TMZ resistance. Paradoxically, MGMT-deficient GBM patients survive longer despite still developing resistance to TMZ. Recent studies indicate that the gap junction protein connexin 43 (Cx43) renders GBM cells resistant to TMZ through its carboxyl terminus (CT). In this study, we report insights into how Cx43 promotes TMZ resistance. Cx43 levels were inversely correlated with TMZ sensitivity of GBM cells, including GBM stem cells. Moreover, Cx43 levels inversely correlated with patient survival, including as observed in MGMT-deficient GBM patients. Addition of the C-terminal peptide mimetic αCT1, a selective inhibitor of Cx43 channels, sensitized human MGMT-deficient and TMZ-resistant GBM cells to TMZ treatment. Moreover, combining αCT1 with TMZ-blocked AKT/mTOR signaling, induced autophagy and apoptosis in TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Our findings suggest that Cx43 may offer a biomarker to predict the survival of patients with MGMT-independent TMZ resistance and that combining a Cx43 inhibitor with TMZ could enhance therapeutic responses in GBM, and perhaps other TMZ-resistant cancers.

Pretreatment but not subsequent coincubation with midazolam reduces the cytotoxicity of temozolomide in neuroblastoma cells

Background

Temozolomide (TMZ) induces a G2/M cell cycle arrest and is used for treatment of paediatric tumours, especially neuroblastomas. Patients treated with TMZ frequently receive midazolam for sedation prior to surgery and other interventions. Previous studies suggested both cytoprotective and apoptosis-inducing properties of midazolam. Therefore, the impact of midazolam on TMZ-induced cytotoxicity was investigated in vitro.

Methods

Human neuroblastoma cells were incubated with midazolam alone, as a pretreatment prior to incubation with TMZ or a coincubation of both. Cell viability and proliferation was analysed (XTT and BrdU assay) after 24 h and flowcytometric cell cycle analysis was performed after 24 and 48 h.

Results

Midazolam alone increased cell viability at lower concentrations (2, 4, 8, 16 μM), whereas higher concentrations (128, 256, 512 μM) reduced cell viability. Pretreatment with midazolam 6 h prior to TMZ incubation reduced cytotoxic effects (IC₂₅ 1005 ± 197 μM; IC₅₀ 1676 ± 557 μM; P < 0.05) compared to incubation with TMZ alone (IC₂₅ 449 ± 304 μM; IC₅₀ 925 ± 196 μM) and reduced the antiproliferative effect of TMZ (1000 μM) by 43.9 % (P < 0.05). In contrast, cytotoxic effects of TMZ were increased (IC₇₅ 1175 ± 221 μM vs. 2764 ± 307 μM; P < 0.05) when midazolam pretreatment was followed by coincubation of midazolam and TMZ. Cell cycle analysis revealed increased fractions of cells in G2/M phase after TMZ treatment (100 μM; 48 h), irrespective of midazolam pretreatment.

Conclusion

Midazolam causes a hormetic dose–response relationship in human neuroblastoma cells. Pretreatment with midazolam reduces the cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of TMZ without interfering with G2/M cell cycle arrest. In contrast, subsequent midazolam coincubation increases overall cytotoxicity.

Comparison of pemetrexed plus cisplatin with gemcitabine plus docetaxel in refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma: Clinical outcomes from a retrospective database monitored in a single institute

The prognosis for patients with relapsed/metastatic osteosarcoma is poor and the optimal treatment strategy remains to be refined. Whilst gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination treatment has already been demonstrated to have certain promising results in the treatment of osteosarcoma, the use of pemetrexed, a multi-targeted antifolate, remains controversial. In the present study, a retrospective investigation was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the pemetrexed plus cisplatin combination in relapsed/metastatic osteosarcoma. Comparison of this treatment with that of the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination was also conducted. Clinical data from 39 patients suffering from refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma between January 2005 and May 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Of these patients, 21 were administered the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination, and 18 were provided the pemetrexed plus cisplatin combination. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In the gemcitabine plus docetaxel group, the overall response rate and disease control rate were found to be 9.5 and 28.5% respectively, compared with 5.5 and 33.3% respectively in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was found to be 1.8 months for both the gemcitabine plus docetaxel and pemetrexed plus cisplatin groups. The median overall survival (OS) time was 6 months in the gemcitabine plus docetaxel group and 7 months in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group. No statistically significant differences were recognized between the overall response rates, disease control rates, PFS times and OS times in the two groups. The two combinations appeared to be well tolerated. However, the incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and leucopenia was higher in the gemcitabine plus docetaxel group than in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group. The present study clearly demonstrated that both chemo-combinations were well-tolerated and exerted antitumor activity in patients with refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma. However, with regard to grade 3/4 toxicity, the pemetrexed plus cisplatin chemotherapy appears to be better tolerated.

Temozolomide is an active agent in children with recurrent medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor: an Italian multi-institutional phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the objective response rate (ORR) of children and young adults with recurrent medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (MB/PNET) treated with temozolomide (TMZ). The secondary purpose was to analyze the toxicity profile of TMZ when administered orally for 5 days in 3 divided daily doses every 28 days.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with recurrent MB/PNET, aged 21 years and younger, were recruited. Patients were treated with oral TMZ. Starting doses ranged from 120 to 200 mg/m(2)/day based on previous treatments. A craniospinal MRI was performed prior to the first cycle of TMZ and following every 2 cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Median age was 10 years (range, 2-21 years). Forty of 42 patients were assessed for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 42.5%: 6 patients achieved a complete response, 11 had a partial response, and 10 had stable disease. Progression-free survival rates for all patients at 6 and 12 months were 30% and 7.5%, respectively. Their median overall survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 42.5% and 17.5%, respectively. No major extrahematological effects or life-threatening events were reported. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity included thrombocytopenia (17.5%), neutropenia (7.5%), and anemia (2.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

TMZ proved to be an effective agent in children and young adults with MB/PNET, heavily pre-treated, with a tolerable toxicity profile.

Vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide in patients with relapsed and refractory Ewing sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic, progressive or recurrent Ewing sarcoma (ES) have a dismal outcome. The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide has been proposed as an effective salvage regimen for some pediatric malignancies. Thus, we sought to evaluate this combination with vincristine for patients with relapsed and refractory ES.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with relapsed or refractory ES were treated with the combination of vincristine (1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1), irinotecan (50 mg/m(2) /day i.v. days 1-5) and temozolomide (125 mg/m(2) /day p.o. days 1-5) (VIT) during the period 2008-2012. All toxicities were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 91 cycles (median 4.1 cycles/patient) were administered. A complete response (CR) was achieved in five patients, partial response (PR) in seven patients, stable disease (SD) in three patients, and progression disease (PD) in seven patients, with an overall response rate of 68.1%. Median time to progression was 3.0 months (range 1.1-37.1 months). Five patients (22.7%) are alive with no evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 2.1-46.5); four of them received consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant after responding to VIT. Outcome was better for patients with relapsed ES compared with patients who progressed to initial therapy (estimated 2 year overall survival 36.4% vs. 0%, respectively). There were no significant toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The shorter, 5-day VIT regimen is an active and well-tolerated regimen in refractory ES. This combination deserves further investigation in the upfront management of patients with metastatic disease.

Phase II study of temozolomide in combination with topotecan (TOTEM) in relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer-SIOP-European Neuroblastoma study

PURPOSE

To assess objective response rate (ORR) after two cycles of temozolomide in combination with topotecan (TOTEM) in children with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, non-randomised, phase II study included children with neuroblastoma according to a two-stage Simon design. Eligibility criteria included relapsed or refractory, measurable or metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) evaluable disease, no more than two lines of prior treatment. Temozolomide was administered orally at 150mg/m(2) followed by topotecan at 0.75mg/m(2) intravenously for five consecutive days every 28days. Tumour response was assessed every two cycles according to International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC), and reviewed independently.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enroled and treated in 15 European centres with a median age of 5.4years. Partial tumour response after two cycles was observed in 7 out of 38 evaluable patients [ORR 18%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8-34%]. The best ORR whatever the time of evaluation was 24% (95% CI, 11-40%) with a median response duration of 8.5months. Tumour control rate (complete response (CR)+partial response (PR)+mixed response (MR)+stable disease (SD)) was 68% (95% CI, 63-90%). The 12-months Progression-Free and Overall Survival were 42% and 58% respectively. Among 213 treatment cycles (median 4, range 1-12 per patient) the most common treatment-related toxicities were haematologic. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 62% of courses in 89% of patients, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 47% of courses in 71% of patients; three patients (8%) had febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Temozolomide-Topotecan combination results in very encouraging ORR and tumour control in children with heavily pretreated recurrent and refractory neuroblastoma with favourable toxicity profile.

Phase II study of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide (TEMIRI) in children with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma: a joint ITCC and SIOPE brain tumor study

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase II study investigated temozolomide + irinotecan (TEMIRI) treatment in children with relapsed or refractory medulloblastoma.

METHODS

Patients received temozolomide 100-125 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-5) and irinotecan 10 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-5 and 8-12) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was tumor response within the first 4 cycles confirmed ≥4 weeks and assessed by an external response review committee (ERRC). In a 2-stage Optimum Simon design, ≥6 responses in the first 15 evaluable patients were required within the first 4 cycles for continued enrollment; a total of 19 responses from the first 46 evaluable patients was considered successful.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were treated. Seven responses were recorded during stage 1 and 15 in the first 46 ERRC evaluated patients (2 complete responses and 13 partial responses). The objective response rate during the first 4 cycles was 32.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.5%-48.0%). Median duration of response was 27.0 weeks (7.7-44.1 wk). In 63 patients evaluated by local investigators, the objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 22.0%-46.3%), and 68.3% (95% CI, 55.3%-79.4%) experienced clinical benefit. Median survival was 16.7 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.8). The most common grade 3 treatment-related nonhematologic adverse event was diarrhea (7.6%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (16.7%), thrombocytopenia (12.1%), anemia (9.1%), and lymphopenia (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The planned study primary endpoint was not met. However, its tolerability makes TEMIRI a suitable candidate chemotherapy backbone for molecularly targeted agents in future trials in this setting.

Vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide for treatment of relapsed alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

Event-free survival for recurrent alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) is poor, and a consensus approach to treatment in the relapse setting has not been established. Recent studies suggest that a combination regimen of vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide (VITA) is active against recurrent sarcomas. We present our single-institution experience with this regimen for relapsed ARMS in heavily pretreated patients, including those with prior exposure to a combination regimen of vincristine and irinotecan. We observed a complete radiographic response in 1 of 4 patients who received VITA as a fifth attempted salvage regimen. Radiographic remission for the responsive patient was sustained for 27 weeks before disease recurrence. All therapies were administered in the outpatient setting and no grade III or grade IV toxicities were observed. These findings suggest that for patients with refractory ARMS, VITA in combination should be among the treatment options considered. They also reinforce the need for biological correlates to prospectively identify patients who may benefit from this treatment.

Initial testing (stage 1) of temozolomide by the pediatric preclinical testing program

BACKGROUND

The DNA methylating agent temozolomide was developed primarily for treatment of glioblastoma. However, preclinical data have suggested a broader application for treatment of childhood cancer. Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP solid tumor and ALL models.

PROCEDURES

Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1,000 µM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at doses from 22 to 100 mg/kg administered orally daily for 5 days, repeated at day 21.

RESULTS

In vitro temozolomide showed cytotoxicity with a median relative IC50 (rIC50 ) value of 380 µM against the PPTP cell lines (range 1 to > 1,000 µM). The three lines with rIC50 values lesser than 10 µM had low MGMT expression compared to the remaining cell lines. In vivo temozolomide demonstrated significant toxicity at 100 mg/kg, but induced tumor regressions in 15 of 23 evaluable solid tumor models (13 maintained CR [MCR], 2 CR) and 5 of 8 ALL models (3 MCR, 2 CR). There was a steep dose response curve, with lower activity at 66 mg/kg temozolomide and with tumor regressions at 22 and 44 mg/kg restricted to models with low MGMT expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide demonstrated high level antitumor activity against both solid tumor and leukemia models, but also elicited significant toxicity at the highest dose level. Lowering the dose of TMZ to more closely match clinical exposures markedly reduced the antitumor activity for many xenograft lines with responsiveness at lower doses closely related to low MGMT expression.

The use of palliative chemotherapy in pediatric oncology patients: a national survey of pediatric oncologists

BACKGROUND

Many children continue receiving chemotherapy after there is no realistic hope for cure. One factor that influences parental decisions to pursue medical therapies is physician preference. To date, no studies have described pediatric oncologists' perspectives and practices regarding palliative chemotherapy (PC).

PROCEDURE

We surveyed via email pediatric oncologists practicing in the U.S who are members of the Children's Oncology Group to achieve the following objectives: (1) Describe pediatric oncologists treatment considerations regarding the use of PC. (2) Assess treatment considerations that influenced pediatric oncologists' therapy recommendations for their most recent patient receiving PC. There were 422 participants (40.8%) who completed the survey.

RESULTS

The most important factors considered by pediatric oncologists when prescribing PC were the toxicity of the chemotherapy (4.90 mean SD = 0.36 utilizing 5 point scale with 1 = not important to 5 = very important), the preferences of the family (4.57; SD = 0.60), and the potential to decrease symptoms arising from tumor burden (4.42; SD = 0.65). These treatment considerations were not as important when PC was prescribed for their most recent patient. Similarly, the chief aims in prescribing PC were not achieved for recent patients receiving PC. For their most recent patient who received PC, 40.8% believe this treatment was primarily for parental wishes.

CONCLUSION

According to 80.2% of pediatric oncologists completing the survey, some patients receive chemotherapy beyond medical benefit and 40.8% of these oncologists have prescribed PC for the purpose of parental wishes to a recent patient. The chief aims in prescribing palliative chemotherapy were not achieved for recent patients.

Temozolomide in relapsed pediatric brain tumors: 14 cases from a single center

AIM

Temozolomide is an active drug against gliomas in adults. It also has some promising effects in pediatric patients with brain tumors. We have conducted a retrospective study to investigate the effectiveness of temozolomide in patients with relapsed brain tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The files of 14 children treated at our hospital between 2005 and 2010 with the diagnoses of relapsed brain tumors were reviewed for pathological characteristics, treatment results, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age at relapse was 8 years (range, 1.08-23; F/M, 5/9). Diagnoses included medulloblastoma (n = 5), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n = 2), ependymoma (n = 2), glioneuronal tumor (n = 1), malignant neoplasm (n = 1), pontine glioma (n = 1), astrocytoma grade III (n = 1), and glioblastoma multiforme (n = 1). All patients except the one with pontine glioma had undergone surgical resection, and all had prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Twelve out of 14 patients had received radiotherapy. The median number of temozolomide courses was 5.0 (range, 1-24). Objective response rate in our patients was 35.7% (three complete responses, one partial response, and one minor response). Stable disease achieved in 14.3% of patients and 50% had progressive disease. Median survival time was 8 months (range, 1-55). At the end of the study, three patients were alive. Hematological toxicity was seen in 30.8% of all courses.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapsed brain tumors in childhood have an unfavorable prognosis. These data suggest that temozolomide might be an active agent against recurrent medulloblastoma. Although overall objective response rate was low, further multicentric studies with temozolomide may be warranted in children with recurrent brain tumors.

Evaluation of pirarubicin-cisplatin chemotherapy in the treatment for refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma: experience of a single institute

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of pirarubicin (THP)-cisplatin (DDP) chemotherapy for refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma. Between 2008 and 2010, 23 patients with refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma were included in this analysis. THP was given at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) i.v. d1 and DDP 100-120 mg/m(2) i.v. d2-3 every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was usually evaluated every two chemotherapy cycles by CT/MRI scan. The primary end point was overall response rate, secondary endpoint including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and toxicities. A total of 68 cycles were given, median 2 per patient (range 2-7). Overall response rate was 13% and disease control rate was 34.5%, with 3 partial responses and 5 stable diseases. Median time to progression and overall survival time were 2 (95%CI 2-11) and 10 months (95%CI 6-23), respectively. Major severe toxicities were grade 3 or 4 leucopenia occurred 12 times (17.7%) in total cycles; Mild toxicities included grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting (80.9%), leucopenia (61.8%), fatigue (50.0%), and alopecia (79.4%). THP-DDP regimen chemotherapy represents an active and well-tolerated treatment for Chinese refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma patients. Further assessment is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy for non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a highly heterogeneous group of rare malignant solid tumors. Non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) comprise all STS except rhabdomyosarcoma. In patients with advanced local or metastatic disease, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) applied after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is a planned rescue therapy for HDCT-related severe hematologic toxicity.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of HDCT followed by autologous HSCT for all stages of soft tissue sarcomas in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the electronic databases CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE and EMBASE (February 2010). Online trial registers, congress abstracts and reference lists of reviews were searched and expert panels and authors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Terms representing STS and autologous HSCT were required in the title, abstract or keywords. In studies with aggregated data, participants with NRSTS and autologous HSCT had to constitute at least 80% of the data. Comparative non-randomized studies were included because randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were not expected. Case series and case reports were considered for an additional descriptive analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study data were recorded by two review authors independently. For studies with no comparator group, we synthesised results for studies reporting aggregate data and conducted a pooled analysis of individual participant data using the Kaplan-Meyer method. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies, from 467 full texts articles screened (11.5%), reporting on 177 participants that received HSCT and 69 participants that received standard care. Only one study reported comparative data. In the one comparative study, OS at two years after HSCT was estimated as statistically significantly higher (62.3%) compared with participants that received standard care (23.2%). In a single-arm study, the OS two years after HSCT was reported as 20%. In a pooled analysis of the individual data of 54 participants, OS at two years was estimated as 49% (95% CI 34% to 64%). Data on TRM, secondary neoplasia and severe toxicity grade 3 to 4 after transplantation were sparse. All 54 studies had a high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to a lack of comparative studies, it is unclear whether participants with NRSTS have improved survival from autologous HSCT following HDCT. Owing to this current gap in knowledge, at present HDCT and autologous HSCT for NRSTS should only be used within controlled trials.

Activity of irinotecan and temozolomide in the presence of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inhibition in neuroblastoma pre-clinical models

Background:

The combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and irinotecan is a regimen used in neuroblastoma patients with recurrent disease. O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) may have a function in resistance to TMZ. Using neuroblastoma pre-clinical models, we determined whether the inhibition of MGMT by O⁶-benzylguanine (O6-BG) could enhance the anti-tumour activity of TMZ and irinotecan.

Methods:

The cytotoxicity of TMZ and irinotecan, either alone or in combination, was measured in five neuroblastoma cell lines in the presence or absence of O6-BG with a fluorescence-based cell viability assay (DIMSCAN). Anti-tumour activity was measured in three neuroblastoma xenograft models.

Results:

MGMT mRNA and protein were expressed in 9 out of 10 examined cell lines. Pretreatment of cells with 25 μM O6-BG decreased MGMT protein expression and enhanced The TMZ cytotoxicity by up to 0.3–1.4 logs in four out of five tested cell lines. TMZ (25 mg kg⁻¹ per day for 5 days every 3 weeks for four cycles) did not significantly improve mice survival, whereas the same schedule of irinotecan (7.5 mg kg⁻¹ per day) significantly improved survival (P<0.0001) in all three xenograft models. Combining O6-BG and/or TMZ with irinotecan further enhanced survival.

Conclusion:

Our in vitro and in vivo findings suggest that irinotecan drives the activity of irinotecan and TMZ in recurrent neuroblastoma. Inhibitors of MGMT warrant further investigation for enhancing the activity of regimens that include TMZ.

Phase I study of topotecan in combination with temozolomide (TOTEM) in relapsed or refractory paediatric solid tumours

PURPOSE

To evaluate maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose (RD) for phase II studies of topotecan (TPT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) (TOTEM) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multicentre, phase I study with a standard '3+3' design in five dose increments. Eligible patients: aged 6 months to 21 years, diagnosis of a solid malignancy failed at least 2 previous lines of therapy. TMZ was administered orally, starting at 100 mg/m(2)/d, and TPT intravenously over 30 min, starting at 0.75 mg/m(2)/d over 5 consecutive days every 28 d. A pharmacokinetics analysis was performed on Day 1 and Day 5 of cycle 1.

RESULTS

Between February and October 2007, 16 patients were treated. The median age was 8.5 years (range, 3-19 years). Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 d) during the first cycle occurred in 2 of 3 patients at level 3 (TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/d and TPT 1.0 mg/m(2)/d) and was always manageable. Confirmed complete and partial responses were observed in 4 patients (25%), three with metastatic neuroblastoma and one with high-grade glioma. Seven patients had a stable disease. Pharmacokinetic data show a wide inter-individual variability. No significant differences were observed between plasma TMZ and TPT concentrations on Day 1 and Day 5 indicating the absence of pharmacokinetic interaction between the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The RD for the combination is TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/d and TPT 0.75 mg/m(2)/d with dose-limiting haematological toxicity. The observed activity deserves further evaluation in paediatric malignancies.

Salvage chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent ependymoma of childhood

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy has limited role in the up-front management of ependymoma. At the time of recurrence, the role of chemotherapy is also ill defined and the choice of chemotherapeutic agents is often arbitrary, based on anecdotal data and personal experience.

METHODS

The purpose of this review is to describe and critically analyze the published literature on chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and metastatic ependymoma.

DISCUSSION

The disappointing response rate with single agents (12.9%) and combinations (17.4%) emphasizes the need to re-evaluate the current chemotherapeutic approach of intracranial ependymoma, and biological studies are needed to identify targets that may be considered for clinical trials.

The history of ependymoma management

INTRODUCTION

The ependymomas are relatively not a common tumor. However, most clinicians agree that the radical removal of the tumor is the most important prognostic factor.

MORBIDITY OF TREATMENT

Tumor removal was not sufficient before the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and resulted in a considerable operative morbidity and mortality. As the microneurosurgical techniques and microsurgical anatomy become popular and the MRI provide more detailed anatomical information preoperatively, radical removal of this complex and complicated tumor can be more feasible. In childhood ependymoma, the treatment-related morbidity and mortality can be the special issues, which can modify the policy of management safe tumor removal and minimal adjuvant treatment, which are extremely important.

RADIATION THERAPY

Radiation treatment has been the option for disseminated disease and residual tumor. With the advancement of detailed MR anatomical information, safer and more delicate radiation becomes possible with newer radiation modalities, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulating radiotherapy, and tomotherapy.

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

Although many clinicians believe that the ependymomas are inheritably chemoresistant, the new targets for the treatment are under investigation or clinically tried. Also, the genetic alterations of ependymoma are developing and might be a promising target.

CONCLUSION

The surgical techniques and assistant modalities for tumor removal are still advancing. So, the outcome of ependymoma is still improving. Unfortunately, newer treatment modalities, such as new chemotherapeutic agent and gene modification agent, are still not promising. The history of ependymoma management is still in progress.

Phase 2 trial of two courses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide for relapsed high-risk osteosarcoma patients

BACKGROUND

A phase 2 trial was carried out to assess the antineoplastic activity of 2 courses of cyclophosphamide-etoposide in relapsed osteosarcoma patients.

METHODS

Twenty-six relapsed osteosarcoma patients with a median age of 18.5 years (8.3-47.1) were enrolled. Seven patients were in first relapse (27%), 11 in second relapse (42%), 7 in third relapse (27%), and 1 in fourth relapse (4%). Eighteen patients had bone metastasis at study entry (69%). Cyclophosphamide was given at 4 g/m(2) on Day 1 followed by etoposide at 200 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 3, and 4. Second cyclophosphamide and etoposide was planned at 21 days to 28 days from the previous one. The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical benefit at 4 months measured as progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Progression-free survival at 4 months was 42%. Five patients achieved responses (19%), 9 patients had stable disease (35%), and 12 had tumor progression (46%). Overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 50%. The only grade 4 extrahematological toxicities were fever (5%), acute bronchospasm (4%) and stomatitis (18%). Six patients (23%) underwent radical surgery after cyclophosphamide and etoposide x2.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclophosphamide and etoposide x2 may arrest osteosarcoma progression in a significant number of patients (54%). Osteosarcoma progression arrest after cyclophosphamide and etoposide x2 translates in a better OS. Cyclophosphamide and etoposide x2 had good tolerability and the toxicity was time-limited and resolved in all cases.

Pediatric brain tumors: mutations of two dioxygenases (hABH2 and hABH3) that directly repair alkylation damage

Alkylating agents, commonly used for brain tumor therapy, induce DNA and RNA lesions that, if not repaired, drive cells to apoptosis. Thus, cellular mechanisms that are responsible for nucleic acid repair are possibly involved in drug resistance. This work analyzes hABH2 and hABH3, two human Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases in pediatric brain tumors that are treated with alkylating agents. We analyzed 25 brain tumor samples for hABH2 and hABH3 mutations; a subset of samples was tested for quantitative expression with Real-Time PCR. Sequencing analysis showed two new mutations in two glioma patients, one of hABH2 coding sequence (I141 V) and the other of hABH3 (D189 N). The mutation at codon 189 falls in a crucial region of the protein. All subjects analyzed by Real-Time PCR showed an enhanced expression of the two genes, particularly of hABH2. This is the first study of hABH2 and hABH3 in pediatric brain tumors; further molecular investigations of their mutations and expression may help determine their role in response to chemotherapy.