(Potential) false-negative diagnoses in chorionic villi and a review of the literature

Case report: Prenatal diagnosis of rare chromosome mosaicism: discordant results between chorionic villi and amniotic fluid samples

Objective: We described a unique case of near-negative chromosome mosaicism in chorionic villi but complete monosomy X in amniotic fluid. Methods: Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis were performed separately in the first and second trimesters. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) and rapid aneuploidy detection (QF-PCR and FISH) were performed on placental villi and uncultured amniotic fluid. After pregnancy termination, the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal muscle tissues were sampled for FISH detection. Results: The CMA revealed a lower signal from chromosome X in chorionic villi, with a copy number of 1.85, implying the presence of mosaic monosomy X. However, the QF-PCR and FISH results were nearly normal. In uncultured amniotic fluid, CMA and rapid aneuploidy detection indicated complete monosomy X. Across different sampling points on the aborted fetus, the FISH results varied from normal, to mosaic, and then complete monosomy X. Conclusion: This case presents a rare and complex situation where sampling from uncultured chorionic villi indicated low-level chromosome mosaicism, while sampling from amniotic fluid revealed complete monosomy X. Although some of these discordant outcomes may be due to methodological limitations, we conclude that prenatal consultation should be combined with fetal ultrasound phenotype and genetic testing for a comprehensive evaluation of fetal genetic abnormalities.

Enlarged NT (≥3.5 mm) in the first trimester - not all chromosome aberrations can be detected by NIPT

BACKGROUND

Since non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in maternal blood became available, we evaluated which chromosome aberrations found in our cohort of fetuses with an enlarged NT in the first trimester of pregnancy (tested with SNP microarray) could be detected by NIPT as well.

METHOD

362 fetuses were referred for cytogenetic testing due to an enlarged NT (≥3.5 mm). Chromosome aberrations were investigated using QF-PCR, karyotyping and whole genome SNP array.

RESULTS

After invasive testing a chromosomal abnormality was detected in 137/362 (38 %) fetuses. 100/362 (28 %) cases concerned trisomy 21, 18 or 13, 25/362 (7 %) an aneuploidy of sex chromosomes and 3/362 (0.8 %) triploidy. In 6/362 (1.6 %) a pathogenic structural unbalanced chromosome aberration was seen and in 3/362 (0.8 %) a susceptibility locus for neurodevelopmental disorders was found. We estimated that in 2-10 % of fetuses with enlarged NT a chromosome aberration would be missed by current NIPT approaches.

CONCLUSION

Based on our cohort of fetuses with enlarged NT we may conclude that NIPT, depending on the approach, will miss chromosome aberrations in a significant percentage of pregnancies. Moreover all abnormal NIPT results require confirmatory studies with invasive testing, which will delay definitive diagnosis in ca. 30 % of patients. These figures are important for pretest counseling enabling pregnant women to make informed choices on the prenatal test. Larger cohorts of fetuses with an enlarged NT should be investigated to assess the additional diagnostic value of high resolution array testing for this indication.

False Negative NIPT Results: Risk Figures for Chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 Based on Chorionic Villi Results in 5967 Cases and Literature Review

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) demonstrated a small chance for a false negative result. Since the “fetal” DNA in maternal blood originates from the cytotrophoblast of chorionic villi (CV), some false negative results will have a biological origin. Based on our experience with cytogenetic studies of CV, we tried to estimate this risk. 5967 CV samples of pregnancies at high risk for common aneuplodies were cytogenetically investigated in our centre between January 2000 and December 2011. All cases of fetal trisomy 13, 18 and 21 were retrospectively studied for the presence of a normal karyotype or mosaicism < 30% in short-term cultured (STC-) villi. 404 cases of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 were found amongst 5967 samples (6,8%). Of these 404 cases, 14 (3,7%) had a normal or low mosaic karyotype in STC-villi and therefore would potentially be missed with NIPT. It involved 2% (5/242) of all trisomy 21 cases and 7.3% (9/123) of all trisomy 18 cases. In 1:426 (14/5967) NIPT samples of patients at high risk for common aneuploidies, a trisomy 18 or 21 will potentially be missed due to the biological phenomenon of absence of the chromosome aberration in the cytotrophoblast.

Abnormal non-invasive prenatal test results concordant with karyotype of cytotrophoblast but not reflecting abnormal fetal karyotype

We present a unique case in which non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnoses showed abnormal, but discordant, results. A patient with abnormal non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results, indicating a 99% risk for monosomy X, was referred to our center for genetic counseling and confirmatory studies. Cytogenetic analysis of uncultured mesenchymal core of chorionic villi (CV) revealed a mosaic male karyotype consisting of two abnormal cell lines: one with monosomy X and the other with an isodicentric chromosome Y. Array analysis of the trophoblast confirmed the NIPT results. Based on the CV results, the patient opted for termination of pregnancy. After extensive counseling by a clinical geneticist about the possible outcomes and by a gynecologist about the risk of a second-trimester abortion procedure, the patient agreed to undergo early amniocentesis. Amniocentesis confirmed that the fetus had a male karyotype with an isodicentric chromosome Y, and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array profile suggested absence of the monosomy X cell line. The male infant was expected to be infertile. The patient finally decided to continue the pregnancy. Our case confirms that NIPT results are comparable with those of short-term cultured CV investigating the cytotrophoblast. Our patient was not aware that the NIPT results reveal the placental karyotype, which sometimes may be different from the fetal karyotype. Pretest counseling and providing the risk figures for false-positive and false-negative NIPT results are of great importance in order to discourage women from terminating pregnancies based on NIPT results alone.

Cytogenetic follow-up of chromosomal mosaicism detected in first-trimester prenatal diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To contribute to the risk assessment of true fetal mosaicism after detection of a mosaic chromosomal anomaly in chorionic villus samples (CVS) in order to enable more effective counseling and pregnancy management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 7112 consecutive CVS analyzed on both direct preparations and cultured cells. In 135 out of the 177 cases of mosaicism, we performed cytogenetic follow-up and determined the frequency of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) and true fetal mosaicism according to type and distribution of the cytogenetic abnormality.

RESULTS

True fetal mosaicism was detected in 38 out of 135 cases (28.15%), confirming the higher incidence of CPM (71.85%). Confirmation rate of CV mosaicism depends on the combination of placental cell lineages affected, chromosome involved and mosaic versus non-mosaic chromosomal anomaly. The overall probability of fetal involvement significantly rises with involvement of mesenchymal cells: 5.88% abnormal cytotrophoblast, 20.96% abnormal mesenchyme and 58.97% anomalies in both tissues.

CONCLUSION

Most of the mosaic findings at CVS are unreliable indicators of the fetal karyotype. Our study contributes to large series with cytogenetic information from the different tissues along the cytotrophoblast-extraembrional mesoderm-fetus axis in order to infer clinical relevance of the findings and to enable more effective genetic counseling.

[Trisomy 21 by isochromosome: a case report of true false negative of chorionic villi sampling]

We report a rare case of true false negative of chorionic villi sampling for a child with Down syndrome. A chorionic villi sampling was performed for a nuchal translucency at the first trimester. The karyotype was 46,XX for the short and the long-term culture. Because of facial dysmorphy and cardiopathy to the child, a karytoype was proposed. This postnatal karyotype showed a trisomy 21, by isochromosome 46,XX,i(21)(q10). We expose the mechanism of true false negative of chorionic villi sampling, and particularly the role of isochromosome in this case.

Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting

OBJECTIVE

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a new technique for detecting submicroscopic deletions and duplications. There is limited information regarding its use in the prenatal setting. Here, we present our experience of 269 prenatal aCGHs between 2006 and 2009.

METHOD

The indications for testing were fetal anomalies on ultrasound (U/S), advanced maternal age (AMA), family history of a disorder of unknown etiology, parental concern, abnormal routine karyotype and abnormal serum biochemical screening for common fetal aneuploidies.

RESULTS

Of 15 cases with a known abnormal karyotype, 11 had a normal aCGH. This enabled us to reassure the families and the pregnancies were continued. The remaining four showed an abnormal aCGH, confirming the chromosomes were unbalanced, and were terminated. Of 254 cases with a normal karyotype, 3 had an abnormal aCGH and were terminated. Overall, new clinically relevant results were detected by aCGH in 18 cases, providing additional information for prenatal genetic counseling and risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that prenatal aCGH should be offered particularly in cases with abnormal U/S. We found the rate of detecting an abnormality by aCGH in low-risk pregnancies was 1:84, but larger studies will be needed to expand our knowledge and validate our conclusions.

Application of touch FISH in the study of mosaic tetraploidy and maternal cell contamination in pregnancy losses

PURPOSE

karyotype is a well established technique in the study of spontaneous miscarriages but is associated with selective overgrowth of maternal cells and other culture artefact (spp) such as tetraploidy, which could mask the true karyotype of the conceptus.

METHODS

328 cases of pregnancy losses were studied by karyotype and Multiplex Ligation Dependent Probe Amplification technique. Touch FISH performed in non-cultured cells was used to evaluate the ploidy complement and sex discrepancies using centromeric probes for chromosomes X, Y and 18.

RESULTS

touch FISH confirmed 13 cases of maternal contamination, identified a triploidy and a monosomy X. True tetraploidy was confirmed in 7/14 cases studied.

CONCLUSION

touch FISH protocol is extremely accurate in the distinction of genuine mosaicism from tissue culture artifacts namely in cases with suspicion of tetraploidy and can be used to confirm maternal cell contamination in cases with sex discrepancy between karyotype and MLPA.

Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS

OBJECTIVE

To investigate complete discrepancies in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in three chorion villus samples.

METHODS

Clinical details were obtained from all three patients. Follow-up studies were undertaken where possible by evaluation of chromosome 21 copy number with QF-PCR, interphase FISH, MLPA and karyotyping, and by post-mortem examination.

RESULTS

Case 1: severe oligohydramnios and microcephaly on scan. QF-PCR: trisomy 21; MLPA: trisomy 21; cultured karyotype: 46,XY[48]. Placental and fetal tissue results and post-mortem examination indicated a euploid fetus with trisomy 21 mosaicism confined to the placenta. Case 2: Down screen risk 1:16; NT = 4.4 mm; absent nasal bone (Caucasian mother). QF-PCR: disomy 21; cultured karyotype: 47,XY,+ 21[23]. Neck thickening noted at delivery-post-mortem refused, no fetal tissue available. Placental tissue indicated mosaicism for trisomy 21. Case 3: Down screen risk 1:91; NT = 6.7 mm. QF-PCR: disomy 21; cultured karyotype: 46,XX,der(21;21)(q10;q10)[60]. No follow-up possible. PCR genotyping of cultured cells confirmed sample identity in all three cases. Chromosome 21 markers observed by PCR were biallelic in all three cases, indicating that a mitotic error could account for the presence of the abnormal cell lines in each case.

CONCLUSION

QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and cultured karyotyping may rarely show complete discrepancy in the prediction of fetal trisomy 21 in CVS. Within-biopsy sample mosaicism, together with the testing of different cell populations, provide an explanation for these results. Practical ways to minimise the risk of such discrepancy are proposed.