Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study

In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weight <2.3rd percentile (13.6% [24/177] vs 2.5% [3,892/155,491]; RR 5.5) were significantly increased compared to the general obstetric population. Of the 90 maternal findings, 12 (13.3%) were malignancies and 32 (35.6%) (mosaic) pathogenic copy number variants, mostly associated with mild or no clinical phenotypes. Data from this large cohort study provide crucial information for deciding if and how to implement GW-NIPT in screening programs. Additionally, these data can inform the challenging interpretation, counseling, and follow-up of additional findings.

TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands

The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.

A multidisciplinary review of triphalangeal thumb

Despite being a rare congenital limb anomaly, triphalangeal thumb is a subject of research in various scientific fields, providing new insights in clinical research and evolutionary biology. The findings of triphalangeal thumb can be predictive for other congenital anomalies as part of an underlying syndrome. Furthermore, triphalangeal thumb is still being used as a model in molecular genetics to study gene regulation by long-range regulatory elements. We present a review that summarizes a number of scientifically relevant topics that involve the triphalangeal thumb phenotype. Future initiatives involving multidisciplinary teams collaborating in the field of triphalangeal thumb research can lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms of this condition as well as other congenital upper limb anomalies.

Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals

Background

The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for foetal aneuploidies is currently changing the field of prenatal screening in many countries. As it is non-invasive, safe and accurate, this technique allows for a broad implementation of first-trimester prenatal screening, which raises ethical issues, related, for instance, to informed choice and adverse societal consequences. This article offers an account of a leading international ethical framework for prenatal screening, examines how this framework is used by professionals working in the field of NIPT, and presents ethical guidance for the expansion of the scope of prenatal screening in practice.

Methods

A comparative analysis of authoritative documents is combined with 15 semi-structured interviews with professionals in the field of prenatal screening in the Netherlands. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

The current ethical framework consists of four pillars: the aim of screening, the proportionality of the test, justice, and societal aspects. Respondents recognised and supported this framework in practice, but expressed some concerns. Professionals felt that pregnant women do not always make informed choices, while this is seen as central to reproductive autonomy (the aim of screening), and that pre-test counselling practices stand in need of improvement. Respondents believed that the benefits of NIPT, and of an expansion of its scope, outweigh the harms (proportionality), which are thought to be acceptable. They felt that the out-of-pocket financial contribution currently required by pregnant women constitutes a barrier to access to NIPT, which disproportionally affects those of a lower socioeconomic status (justice). Finally, professionals recognised but did not share concerns about a rising pressure to test or discrimination of disabled persons (societal aspects).

Conclusions

Four types of limits to the scope of NIPT are proposed: NIPT should generate only test outcomes that are relevant to reproductive decision-making, informed choice should be (made) possible through adequate pre-test counselling, the rights of future children should be respected, and equal access should be guaranteed. Although the focus of the interview study is on the Dutch healthcare setting, insights and conclusions can be applied internationally and to other healthcare systems.

Advanced genomic testing may aid in counseling of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum on prenatal ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

Isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum on fetal ultrasound has a varied prognosis. Microarray and exome sequencing (ES) might aid in prenatal counseling.

METHOD

This study includes 25 fetuses with apparently isolated complete corpus callosum (cACC) on ultrasound. All cases were offered single nucleotide polymorphism array. Complementary ES was offered postnatally in selected cases. Clinical physical and neurodevelopmental follow-up was collected.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases opted for single nucleotide polymorphism array testing, which detected a causal anomaly in 2/18 (11.1%; 95% CI 2.0%-31%). Among ongoing pregnancies without a causal anomaly on microarray, 30% (95% CI 8.5%-60%) showed intellectual disability. Postnatal magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination often (64%; 95% CI 38%-85%, and 64%; 95% CI 38%-85%, respectively) revealed additional physical anomalies in cases without a causal anomaly on microarray. Two cases appeared truly isolated after birth. Postnatal sequencing in 4 of 16 cases without a causal anomaly on microarray but with intellectual disability and/or additional postnatal physical anomalies revealed 2 single-gene disorders. Therefore, the estimated diagnostic yield of ES in chromosomally normal cACC fetuses is between 2/4 (50%; 95% CI 11%-89%) and 2/16 (13.3%; 95% CI 2.4%-36%).

CONCLUSION

In accordance with current guidelines, we conclude that microarray should be offered in case of isolated cACC on ultrasound. ES is likely to be informative for prenatal counseling and should be offered if microarray is normal.

Prenatal and postnatal findings in small-for-gestational-age fetuses without structural ultrasound anomalies at 18-24 weeks

OBJECTIVE

To assess phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses without structural anomalies at 18-24 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included structurally normal singleton fetuses with an abdominal circumference ≤ 5^th percentile on detailed ultrasound examination between 18 and 24 weeks' gestation. Cases were stratified according to the absence or presence of other abnormal ultrasound findings, such as abnormal amniotic fluid or soft markers. All patients were offered invasive prenatal testing with rapid aneuploidy detection by qualitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and, if normal, consecutive single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array was also offered. Detailed postnatal follow-up (≥ 5 months) was performed. In cases in which a syndromic phenotype became apparent within 5 months after birth and SNP array had not been performed prenatally, it was performed postnatally.

RESULTS

A total of 211 pregnancies were eligible for inclusion. Of the 158 cases with isolated SGA on ultrasound, 36 opted for invasive prenatal testing. One case of trisomy 21 and one case of a submicroscopic abnormality (a susceptibility locus for neurodevelopmental disease) were detected. Postnatal follow-up showed a postnatal apparent syndromic phenotype in 10 cases. In one case this was due to trisomy 21 and the other nine (5.8%; 95% CI, 2.8-10.0%) cases had normal SNP array results. In 32/53 cases with SGA and associated ultrasound abnormalities, parents opted for invasive testing. One case of trisomy 21 and one of triploidy were found. In 11 cases a syndromic phenotype became apparent after birth. One was due to trisomy 21 and in one case a submicroscopic anomaly (a susceptibility locus) was found. The remaining syndromic cases (17.3%; 95% CI, 8.7-29.0%) had normal SNP array results.

CONCLUSION

Testing for chromosomal anomalies should be offered in cases of SGA between 18 and 24 weeks' gestation. Whole chromosome anomalies occur in 1.3% (95% CI, 0.2-3.9%) of isolated SGA and 5.8% (95% CI, 1.5-14.0%) of associated SGA. In 0.6% (95% CI, 0.1-2.8%) and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.2-8.2%), respectively, SNP array detected a susceptibility locus for neurodevelopmental disease that would not be detected by karyotyping, QF-PCR or non-invasive prenatal testing. Therefore, and because the genetic causes of SGA are diverse, we suggest SNP array testing in cases of SGA. Thorough postnatal examination and follow-up of infants that presented with reduced fetal growth is important because chromosomally normal syndromic phenotypes occur frequently in SGA fetuses. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

False Negative NIPT Results: Risk Figures for Chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 Based on Chorionic Villi Results in 5967 Cases and Literature Review

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) demonstrated a small chance for a false negative result. Since the “fetal” DNA in maternal blood originates from the cytotrophoblast of chorionic villi (CV), some false negative results will have a biological origin. Based on our experience with cytogenetic studies of CV, we tried to estimate this risk. 5967 CV samples of pregnancies at high risk for common aneuplodies were cytogenetically investigated in our centre between January 2000 and December 2011. All cases of fetal trisomy 13, 18 and 21 were retrospectively studied for the presence of a normal karyotype or mosaicism < 30% in short-term cultured (STC-) villi. 404 cases of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 were found amongst 5967 samples (6,8%). Of these 404 cases, 14 (3,7%) had a normal or low mosaic karyotype in STC-villi and therefore would potentially be missed with NIPT. It involved 2% (5/242) of all trisomy 21 cases and 7.3% (9/123) of all trisomy 18 cases. In 1:426 (14/5967) NIPT samples of patients at high risk for common aneuploidies, a trisomy 18 or 21 will potentially be missed due to the biological phenomenon of absence of the chromosome aberration in the cytotrophoblast.

Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing

Genomic array detects more pathogenic chromosome aberrations than conventional karyotyping (CK), including genetic variants associated with a susceptibility for neurodevelopmental disorders; susceptibility loci (SL). Consensus regarding the scope of invasive prenatal diagnosis (PND) pregnant couples should be offered is lacking. This study examined pregnant couples' preferences, doubts and satisfaction regarding the scope of invasive PND. Eighty-two couples choosing prenatal screening (PNS) and 59 couples choosing invasive PND were offered a choice between 5 (comparable to CK) and 0.5 Mb resolution array analysis outcomes, the latter with or without reporting SL. A pre-test self-report questionnaire and post-test telephone interview assessed their choices in-depth. Actual (PND) and hypothetical (PNS) choices differed significantly (p < 0.001). Ninety-five percent of the couples in the PND group chose 0.5 Mb array, vs 69% in the PNS group. Seven percent of the PND group wished not to be informed of SL. Ninety percent was satisfied with their choice and wished to decide about the scope themselves. Pregnant couples wish to make their own choices regarding the scope of invasive PND. It therefore seems justified to offer them a choice in both the resolution of array and disclosure of SL.

Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of submicroscopic genetic copy number variants (CNVs) in fetuses with a structural ultrasound anomaly (restricted to one anatomical system) and a normal karyotype. The aim was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of genomic array testing in these pregnancies.

METHODS

Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched for all relevant articles on prevalence of pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Reported cases were sorted into groups according to anatomical site of the detected ultrasound anomaly. The prevalence of causative submicroscopic CNVs was calculated for each group.

RESULTS

Combined data of the reviewed studies (n = 18) indicated that fetuses with an ultrasound anomaly restricted to one anatomical system (n = 2220) had a 3.1-7.9% chance of carrying a causative submicroscopic CNV, depending on the anatomical system affected. This chance increased to 9.1% for fetuses with multiple ultrasound anomalies (n = 1139).

CONCLUSION

This review indicates that 3.1-7.9% of fetuses with a structural ultrasound anomaly restricted to one anatomical system and a normal karyotype will show a submicroscopic CNV, which explains its phenotype and provides information for fetal prognosis. Therefore, we conclude that microarray has considerable diagnostic and prognostic value in these pregnancies.

Omphalocele: comparison of outcome following prenatal or postnatal diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of prenatal compared with postnatal diagnosis on outcome for liveborn infants with an isolated or with a non-isolated omphalocele.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 101 prenatally and 45 postnatally diagnosed cases of omphalocele. Cases were collected from the ultrasound database of the Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine and the patient database of the Department of Pediatric Surgery.

RESULTS

Following confirmation at delivery or autopsy, prenatally diagnosed omphaloceles included 21 isolated cases, 44 non-isolated cases with a normal karyotype and 36 non-isolated cases with an abnormal karyotype. Of the prenatally diagnosed apparently isolated cases (n = 31), 12 (39%; 95% CI, 22-58%) revealed associated anomalies after delivery. Liveborn infants with an isolated omphalocele had significantly worse short-term morbidity following prenatal diagnosis (n = 14) compared with diagnosis at birth (n = 29), having a lower gestational age at delivery, lower Apgar scores, longer duration of ventilation and parenteral nutrition, more readmissions and a longer hospital stay. The prenatally diagnosed subset contained more infants with a giant omphalocele (9/14 vs. 3/29, P = 0.001) and liver herniation (8/14 vs. 6/29, P = 0.02). The outcome of liveborn infants with a non-isolated omphalocele diagnosed prenatally (n = 17) was not different from that of those diagnosed at birth (n = 16), except for a greater need for ventilation and parenteral nutrition in the prenatal subset.

CONCLUSION

When counseling patients with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated omphalocele, it is important to remember that over one third could turn out to have associated anomalies. Liveborn infants with an isolated omphalocele detected prenatally have worse short-term morbidity than do cases detected at birth. Those with non-isolated omphaloceles detected prenatally have an increased need for ventilation and parenteral nutrition compared with those detected at birth.

Prenatal detection and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) associated with deletion of chromosome 15q26: Two patients and review of the literature

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe birth defect characterized by a defect in the diaphragm with pulmonary hypoplasia and postnatal pulmonary hypertension. Approximately 50% of CDH cases are associated with other non-pulmonary congenital anomalies (so called non-isolated CDH) and in 5-10% of cases there is a chromosomal etiology. The majority of CDH cases are detected prenatally. In some cases prenatal chromosome analysis reveals a causative chromosomal anomaly, most often aneuploidy. Deletion of 15q26 is the most frequently described structural chromosomal aberration in patients with non-isolated CDH. In this paper we report on two patients with a deletion of 15q26 and phenotypes similar to other patients with CDH caused by 15q26 deletions. This phenotype consists of intra-uterine growth retardation, left-sided CDH, cardiac anomalies and characteristic facial features, similar to those seen in Fryns syndrome. We propose that when this combination of birth defects is identified, either pre- or postnatally, further investigations to confirm or exclude a deletion of 15q26 are indicated, since the diagnosis of this deletion will have major consequences for the prognosis and, therefore, can affect decision making.

Transmission and prenatal diagnosis of the T9176C mitochondrial DNA mutation

A family presented with three affected children with Leigh syndrome, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Analysis of the OXPHOS complexes in muscle of two affected patients showed an increase in activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase and a decrease of complex V activity. Mutation analysis revealed the T9176C mutation in the mtATPase 6 gene (OMIM 516060) and the mutation load was above 90% in the patients. Unaffected maternal relatives were tested for carrier-ship and one of them, with a mutation load of 55% in blood, was pregnant with her first child. The possibility of prenatal diagnosis was evaluated. The main problem was the lack of data on genotype-phenotype associations for the T9176C mutation and on variation of the mutation percentage in tissues and in time. Therefore, multiple tissues of affected and unaffected carriers were analysed. Eventually, prenatal diagnosis was offered with understanding by the couple that there could be considerable uncertainty in the interpretation of the results. Prenatal diagnosis was carried out twice on cultured and uncultured chorion villi and amniotic fluid cells. The result was a mutation percentage just below the assumed threshold of expression (90%). The couple decided to continue the pregnancy and an apparently healthy child was born with an as yet unclear prognosis. This is the first prenatal diagnosis for a carrier of the T9176C mutation. Prenatal diagnosis for this mutation is technically reliable, but the prognostic predictions are not straightforward.

Brachydactyly and short stature in a kindred with early-onset parkinsonism

In a Dutch kindred we have identified a deletion of the DJ-1 gene, leading to autosomal-recessive parkinsonism. The parkinsonism patients also had short stature and brachydactyly. In the family and a control group from the same community, we used the DJ-1 deletion as a marker for the originally linked PARK7 region and found a significant association with body height (P = 0.005), which suggests a gene in linkage disequilibrium with DJ-1 to be implicated in short stature. Analysis of hand-bone length showed incomplete segregation of the PARK7 region with brachydactyly, such that a gene in PARK7 is unlikely to fully explain the brachydactyly. Since the bone length reduction was more pronounced in the homozygous parkinsonism patients than in their heterozygous relatives, however, the PARK7 region may contain a modifier gene for growth.

[Prenatal investigations for Down's syndrome: medical-technical considerations and dilemmas arising from current screening methods]

Prenatal investigations can be divided into specific diagnostic investigations i.e. chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis and selective ultrasonography for the detection of fetal abnormality, and screening tests which estimate the chances of the condition being present. These include routine ultrasonography and tests based on biochemical and echoscopic markers. Amniocentesis is the most reliable test to detect chromosomal anomalies, but is associated with a low risk of miscarriage and the results are known only relatively late in pregnancy. Implementing the prenatal screening tests will enable the better identification of those women with an increased risk of chromosomal anomalies, and consequently to fewer invasive diagnostic procedures. The choice whether to have prenatal screening should always be made by the parents after they have been told of the advantages and disadvantages of these investigations.