1
|
Becking EC, Sistermans EA, Bekker MN. Fetal fraction in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a response. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00444-7. [PMID: 38494068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis C Becking
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute & Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nijman M, van der Meeren LE, Nikkels PGJ, Stegeman R, Breur JMPJ, Jansen NJG, ter Heide H, Steenhuis TJ, de Heus R, Bekker MN, Claessens NHP, Benders MJNL. Placental Pathology Contributes to Impaired Volumetric Brain Development in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e033189. [PMID: 38420785 PMCID: PMC10944035 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.033189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonates with congenital heart disease are at risk for impaired brain development in utero, predisposing children to postnatal brain injury and adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Given the vital role of the placenta in fetal growth, we assessed the incidence of placental pathology in fetal congenital heart disease and explored its association with total and regional brain volumes, gyrification, and brain injury after birth. METHODS AND RESULTS Placentas from 96 term singleton pregnancies with severe fetal congenital heart disease were prospectively analyzed for macroscopic and microscopic pathology. We applied a placental pathology severity score to relate placental abnormalities to neurological outcome. Postnatal, presurgical magnetic resonance imaging was used to analyze brain volumes, gyrification, and brain injuries. Placental analyses revealed the following abnormalities: maternal vascular malperfusion lesions in 46%, nucleated red blood cells in 37%, chronic inflammatory lesions in 35%, delayed maturation in 30%, and placental weight below the 10th percentile in 28%. Severity of placental pathology was negatively correlated with cortical gray matter, deep gray matter, brainstem, cerebellar, and total brain volumes (r=-0.25 to -0.31, all P<0.05). When correcting for postmenstrual age at magnetic resonance imaging in linear regression, this association remained significant for cortical gray matter, cerebellar, and total brain volume (adjusted R2=0.25-0.47, all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Placental pathology occurs frequently in neonates with severe congenital heart disease and may contribute to impaired brain development, indicated by the association between placental pathology severity and reductions in postnatal cortical, cerebellar, and total brain volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike Nijman
- Department of NeonatologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric CardiologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Lotte E. van der Meeren
- Department of PathologyErasmus Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
| | - Peter G. J. Nikkels
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Raymond Stegeman
- Department of NeonatologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric CardiologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
- Department of PediatricsBeatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Johannes M. P. J. Breur
- Department of Pediatric CardiologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas J. G. Jansen
- Department of PediatricsBeatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Henriette ter Heide
- Department of Pediatric CardiologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Trinette J. Steenhuis
- Department of Pediatric CardiologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Roel de Heus
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySt. Antonius HospitalUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Nathalie H. P. Claessens
- Department of NeonatologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
- Department of PediatricsWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Manon J. N. L. Benders
- Department of NeonatologyWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neukomm A, Claessens NHP, Bonthrone AF, Stegeman R, Feldmann M, Nijman M, Jansen NJG, Nijman J, Groenendaal F, de Vries LS, Benders MJNL, Breur JMPJ, Haas F, Bekker MN, Logeswaran T, Reich B, Kottke R, Dave H, Simpson J, Pushparajah K, Kelly CJ, Arulkumaran S, Rutherford MA, Counsell SJ, Chew A, Knirsch W, Sprong MCA, van Schooneveld MM, Hagmann C, Latal B. Perioperative Brain Injury in Relation to Early Neurodevelopment Among Children with Severe Congenital Heart Disease: Results from a European Collaboration. J Pediatr 2024; 266:113838. [PMID: 37995930 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between perioperative brain injury and neurodevelopment during early childhood in patients with severe congenital heart disease (CHD). STUDY DESIGN One hundred and seventy children with CHD and born at term who required cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in the first 6 weeks after birth were recruited from 3 European centers and underwent preoperative and postoperative brain MRIs. Uniform description of imaging findings was performed and an overall brain injury score was created, based on the sum of the worst preoperative or postoperative brain injury subscores. Motor and cognitive outcomes were assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition at 12 to 30 months of age. The relationship between brain injury score and clinical outcome was assessed using multiple linear regression analysis, adjusting for CHD severity, length of hospital stay (LOS), socioeconomic status (SES), and age at follow-up. RESULTS Neither the overall brain injury score nor any of the brain injury subscores correlated with motor or cognitive outcome. The number of preoperative white matter lesions was significantly associated with gross motor outcome after correction for multiple testing (P = .013, β = -0.50). SES was independently associated with cognitive outcome (P < .001, β = 0.26), and LOS with motor outcome (P < .001, β = -0.35). CONCLUSION Preoperative white matter lesions appear to be the most predictive MRI marker for adverse early childhood gross motor outcome in this large European cohort of infants with severe CHD. LOS as a marker of disease severity, and SES influence outcome and future intervention trials need to address these risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Neukomm
- Child Development Center, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie H P Claessens
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Congenital Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra F Bonthrone
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raymond Stegeman
- Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Feldmann
- Child Development Center, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maaike Nijman
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Congenital Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas J G Jansen
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joppe Nijman
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda S de Vries
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon J N L Benders
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes M P J Breur
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Felix Haas
- Congenital Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thushiha Logeswaran
- Pediatric Heart Center, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bettina Reich
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raimund Kottke
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hitendu Dave
- Division of Congenital Cardiovascular Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - John Simpson
- Pediatric Cardiology Department, Evelina Children's Hospital London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kuberan Pushparajah
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Pediatric Cardiology Department, Evelina Children's Hospital London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher J Kelly
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Arulkumaran
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Walter Knirsch
- Pediatric Cardiology, Pediatric Heart Center, Department of Surgery, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maaike C A Sprong
- Child Development & Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique M van Schooneveld
- Department of Pediatric Psychology, Neuropsychology Section, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia Hagmann
- Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Latal
- Child Development Center, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bakkeren IM, Henneman L, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Polak MG, Bekker MN, Galjaard RJH. Psychological impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): TRIDENT-2 study. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:302-308. [PMID: 38057584 PMCID: PMC10923886 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01504-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In the Netherlands, genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is offered to all pregnant women as part of the nationwide TRIDENT-2 study. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13, which are called "additional findings", are reported only on request of the pregnant woman. This study examined: (1) women's pre-test perceptions and reasons to opt for additional findings and (2) women's experiences with- and the psychological impact of being informed about an additional finding. A questionnaire, consisting of the anxiety measure State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), distress measure Impact of Event Scale (IES) and questions developed specifically for this study, was retrospectively administered to 402 women who received an additional finding. A total of 227 (56.5%) women completed the questionnaire. Most (60.2%) chose to know additional findings because they wanted as much information as possible about the health of their fetus. Almost all (92%) stated that receiving the additional finding was unexpected, a shock, and/or they were in disbelief, for 85% it caused a lot of worry. Post-test, high anxiety (STAI) levels were reported in 15.5% of women, and 7.5% reported severe distress (IES). Women who gave birth to an affected child (n = 10) experienced most psychological impact (STAI and IES). Eighty-six percent of women with a fetal aberration would opt for additional findings again, compared to 49.2% of women whose result was confined to the placenta. Pre-test counseling should focus on explaining the different results NIPT can generate. Post-test counseling should focus on guiding pregnant women through this uncertain and anxious time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris M Bakkeren
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marike G Polak
- Department of Psychology, Education & Child Studies (DPECS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Becking EC, Scheffer PG, Henrichs J, Bax CJ, Crombag NMTH, Weiss MM, Macville MVE, Van Opstal D, Boon EMJ, Sistermans EA, Henneman L, Schuit E, Bekker MN. Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 56,110 pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023:S0002-9378(23)02128-2. [PMID: 38097030 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasive prenatal testing by cell-free DNA analysis is offered to pregnant women worldwide to screen for fetal aneuploidies. In noninvasive prenatal testing, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation is measured as a quality control parameter. Given that fetal cell-free DNA originates from the placenta, the fetal fraction might also reflect placental health and maternal pregnancy adaptation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the association between the fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies opting for noninvasive prenatal testing between June 2018 and June 2019 within the Dutch nationwide implementation study (Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing [TRIDENT]-2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations between fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fetal fraction was assessed as a continuous variable and as <10th percentile, corresponding to a fetal fraction <2.5%. RESULTS The cohort comprised 56,110 pregnancies. In the analysis of fetal fraction as a continuous variable, a decrease in fetal fraction was associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.89-2.78]), small for gestational age neonates <10th percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 [1.28-1.45]) and <2.3rd percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63 [1.96-3.57]), and spontaneous preterm birth from 24 to 37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.01-1.03]). No association was found for fetal congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.00-1.04]), stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96-1.08]), or neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96-1.08]). Similar associations were found for adverse pregnancy outcomes when fetal fraction was <10th percentile. CONCLUSION In early pregnancy, a low fetal fraction is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings can be used to expand the potential of noninvasive prenatal testing in the future, enabling the prediction of pregnancy complications and facilitating tailored pregnancy management through intensified monitoring or preventive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis C Becking
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter G Scheffer
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Henrichs
- Department of Midwifery Science, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline J Bax
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neeltje M T H Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjan M Weiss
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Merryn V E Macville
- Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Diane Van Opstal
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elles M J Boon
- Department of Human Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ewoud Schuit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lust EER, Bronsgeest K, Henneman L, Crombag N, Bilardo CM, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, Galjaard RJH, Sikkel E, Haak MC, Bekker MN. Informed choice and routinization of the second-trimester anomaly scan: a national cohort study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:694. [PMID: 37752446 PMCID: PMC10521538 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05981-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2007 all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered the second-trimester anomaly scan (SAS) in a nationwide prenatal screening program. This study aims to assess the level of informed choice of women opting for the SAS and to evaluate the presence of routinization 16 years after its implementation. It further explores decisional conflict and women's decision making. METHODS This prospective national survey study consisted of an online questionnaire which was completed after prenatal counseling and before undergoing the SAS. Informed choice was measured by the adapted multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) and was defined in case women were classified as value-consistent, if their decision for the SAS was deliberated and made with sufficient knowledge. RESULTS A total of 894/1167 (76.6%) women completed the questionnaire. Overall, 54.8% made an informed choice, 89.6% had good knowledge, 59.8% had deliberated their choice and 92.7% held a positive attitude towards the SAS. Women with low educational attainment (p=0.004) or respondents of non-Western descent (p=0.038) were less likely to make an informed choice. Decisional conflict was low, with a significantly lower decisional conflict score in women that made an informed choice (p<0.001). Most respondents (97.9%) did not perceive pressure to undergo the SAS. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a relatively low rate of informed choice for the SAS, due to absence of deliberation. Therefore, some routinization seem to be present in the Netherlands. However, most women had sufficient knowledge, did not perceive pressure and experienced low decisional conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline E R Lust
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Bronsgeest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Caterina M Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Sikkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique C Haak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghalandari N, Immink MM, Röder E, Bruijning-Verhagen PCJ, Smeele H, Crijns H, van der Maas NAT, Bekker MN, Sanders EAM, Dolhain RJEM. Maternal and neonatal antibody levels on pertussis vaccination in pregnant women on immune-modulating therapy for rheumatic disease. RMD Open 2023; 9:e002985. [PMID: 37640516 PMCID: PMC10462940 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-002985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While protection against pertussis following maternal tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccination was demonstrated in healthy term-born infants, no evidence is available on Tdap vaccination in combination with immune-modulating therapy during pregnancy. In this pilot study, we explored whether treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFis) in pregnant patients with rheumatic disease interferes with Tdap vaccine responses and affects maternal anti-pertussis IgG antibody levels in newborns. METHODS Patients were included by a rheumatologist during pregnancy in case they received maternal Tdap vaccination in the late-second or early-third trimester of pregnancy. Blood samples were obtained from mothers during the first pregnancy trimester, 3 months after delivery and from the umbilical cord. IgG antibody levels against Tdap-included antigens were measured using a bead-based multiplex immunoassay. Findings on patients exposed to TNFis were compared with those from TNFi-unexposed patients and with data from a historical comparator study among healthy Tdap vaccinated mother-infant pairs (n=53). RESULTS 66 patients (46 exposed and 20 unexposed to TNFIs) were enrolled. No major differences in IgG antibody levels were observed between TNFi-exposed and unexposed mothers before maternal Tdap vaccination and 3 months after delivery. In cord sera, however, antibody levels against pertussis toxin were significantly lower after TNFi-treatment (35.94 IU/mL, 95% CI 20.68 to 62.45) compared with no TNFi-treatment of mothers with rheumatic disease (94.61 IU/mL, 95% CI 48.89 to 183.07) and lower compared with a cohort of healthy mothers (125.12 IU/mL, 95% CI 90.75 to 172.50). We observed similar differences for filamentous haemagglutinin, pertactin, tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid. CONCLUSION These preliminary data indicate no major differences in IgG antibody levels on maternal Tdap vaccination in pregnant women with or without immune-modulating treatment, although our findings suggest that TNFis during pregnancy induce lower maternal anti-pertussis-specific protective antibody levels in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafise Ghalandari
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten M Immink
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Esther Röder
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patricia C J Bruijning-Verhagen
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hieronymus Smeele
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bronsgeest K, Lust EER, Henneman L, Crombag N, Bilardo CM, Stemkens D, Galjaard RJH, Sikkel E, van der Hout SH, Bekker MN, Haak MC. Current practice of first-trimester ultrasound screening for structural fetal anomalies in developed countries. Prenat Diagn 2023. [PMID: 37269059 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES First-trimester ultrasound screening is increasingly performed to detect fetal anomalies early in pregnancy, aiming to enhance reproductive autonomy for future parents. This study aims to display the current practice of first-trimester ultrasound screening in developed countries. METHOD An online survey study among 47 prenatal screening experts in developed countries. RESULTS First-trimester structural anomaly screening is available in 30 of the 33 countries and mostly offered to all women with generally high uptakes. National protocols are available in 23/30 (76.7%) countries, but the extent of anatomy assessment varies. Monitoring of scan quality occurs in 43.3% of the countries. 23/43 (53.5%) of the respondents considered the quality of first-trimester ultrasound screening unequal in different regions of their country. CONCLUSIONS First-trimester screening for structural fetal anomalies is widely offered in developed countries but large differences are reported in availability and use of screening protocols, extent of anatomy assessment, training and experience of sonographers and quality monitoring systems. Consequently, this results in an unequal offer to parents in developed countries, sometimes even within the same country. Furthermore, as offer and execution differ so widely, this has to be taken into account when results of screening policies are scientifically published or compared. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Bronsgeest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eline E R Lust
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caterina M Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Stemkens
- VSOP-Patient Alliance for Rare and Genetic Diseases, Soest, The Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Sikkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne H van der Hout
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Maastricht University Medical Centre/Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique C Haak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Eekhout JCA, Bekker MN, Bax CJ, Galjaard RJH. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in twin pregnancies affected by early single fetal demise: A systematic review of NIPT and vanishing twins. Prenat Diagn 2023. [PMID: 37226326 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The screening performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in vanishing twin pregnancies is relatively unknown. To close this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review of available literature. METHOD Studies describing the test performance of NIPT for trisomy 21, 18, 13, sex chromosomes and additional findings in pregnancies with a vanishing twin were retrieved from a literature search with a publication date until October 4th , 2022. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS- 2). The screen positive rate of the pooled data and the pooled positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS Seven studies, with cohort sizes ranging from 5 to 767, were included. The screen positive rate of the pooled data for trisomy 21 was 35/1592(2.2%), with a PPV of 20%(confirmation in 7/35 cases[95%CI 9.8%-36%]). For trisomy 18, the screen positive rate was 13/1592(0.91%) and the pooled PPV 25%[95%CI 1.3%-90%]. The screen positive rate for trisomy 13 was 7/1592(0.44%) and confirmed in 0/7 cases(pooled PPV 0%[95%CI 0%-100%]). The screen positive rate for additional findings as 23/767(2.9%), of which none could be confirmed. No discordant negative results were reported. CONCLUSION There is insufficient data to fully evaluate NIPT performance in pregnancies with a vanishing twin. However, existing studies suggest that NIPT can successfully detect common autosomal aneuploidies in pregnancies affected by a vanishing twin, but with a higher false positive rate. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of NIPT in vanishing twin pregnancies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline J Bax
- Department of Obstetrics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Becking EC, Schuit E, van Baar de Knegt SME, Sistermans EA, Henneman L, Bekker MN, Scheffer PG. Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA screening and fetal chromosomal aberrations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2023. [PMID: 37143173 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature on low fetal fraction (LFF) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening and the risk of fetal chromosomal aberrations. METHOD We searched articles published between January 2010 and May 2021 in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data of 243,700 singleton pregnancies. Compared to normal fetal fraction, LFF was associated with a higher risk of trisomy 13 (OR 5.99 [3.61-9.95], I 2 of heterogeneity = 0%, n=22 studies), trisomy 18 (OR 4.46 [3.07-6.47], I2 = 0%, n=22 studies), monosomy X (OR 5.88 [2.34-14.78], I2 = 18%, n=10 studies), and triploidy (OR 36.39 [9.83-134.68], I2 = 61%, n=6 studies), but not trisomy 21 (OR 1.25 [0.76-2.03], I2 = 36%, n=23 studies). LFF was also associated with a higher risk of various other types of fetal chromosomal aberrations (OR 4.00 [1.78-9.00], I2 = 2%, n=11 studies). Meta-analysis of proportions showed that absolute rates of fetal chromosomal aberrations ranged between 1-2% in women with LFF. A limitation of this review is the potential risk of ascertainment bias because of differences in outcome assessment between pregnancies with LFF and those with normal fetal fraction. Heterogeneity in population characteristics or applied technologies across included studies may not have been fully addressed. CONCLUSION An LFF test result in cfDNA screening is associated with an increased risk of fetal trisomy 13, trisomy 18, monosomy X, and triploidy, but not trisomy 21. Further research is needed to assess the association between LFF and specific other types of fetal chromosomal aberrations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis C Becking
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ewoud Schuit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Cochrane Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie M E van Baar de Knegt
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G Scheffer
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Immink MM, van der Maas NAT, de Melker HE, Ferreira JA, Bekker MN. Socio-psychological determinants of second trimester maternal pertussis vaccination acceptance in the Netherlands. Vaccine 2023; 41:3446-3453. [PMID: 37121803 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A maternal tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is offered to all pregnant women in the Netherlands in their second trimester since December 2019. However, former studies solely investigated the socio-psychological factors that influence vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in the third trimester. We identified predicting factors for attitude, intention and acceptance of maternal Tdap vaccination during the second trimester of pregnancy. METHODS As part of a large prospective cohort study, women early in pregnancy completed a questionnaire on determinants regarding acceptance of maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 and 24w of gestation. The vaccine was offered after completion of the questionnaire. A random forest model and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses were carried out to identify the factors most predictive for vaccine acceptance on the whole data set, and also in sensitivity analysis on a subset reflecting the annual nationwide 70% vaccination uptake. RESULTS Among 1158 participants who were offered a Tdap vaccination between 20 and 24w of gestation, 1098 (94.8%) accepted and 60 (5.2%) rejected the vaccine. Random forest analyses identified intention as most predictive for acceptance, followed by attitude towards vaccination, beliefs regarding safety, risk perception of severity of side effects, moral responsibility, beliefs regarding effectiveness and risk perception of susceptibility of side effects, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 40%, for which this combination could be improved by the ROC analysis to 82% and 67%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis yielded an order of predictors that generally corresponded with the initial model. CONCLUSIONS Intention, attitude, beliefs on safety and effectiveness, risk perception of side effects and moral responsibility were most predictive for maternal Tdap vaccine acceptance during the second trimester of pregnancy, in accordance with studies regarding third trimester vaccination. These should be discussed by healthcare professionals early in pregnancy to provide an informed choice towards vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - José A Ferreira
- Department of Statistics, Informatics and Modelling, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Depla AL, Kersten AW, Ruiter MLD, Jambroes M, Franx A, Evers IM, Pluut B, Bekker MN. Quality Improvement with Outcome Data in Integrated Obstetric Care Networks: Evaluating Collaboration and Learning Across Organizational Boundaries with an Action Research Approach. Int J Integr Care 2023; 23:21. [PMID: 37250763 PMCID: PMC10215997 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) are used to guide individual care and quality improvement (QI). QI with patient-reported data is preferably organized around patients, which is challenging across organisations. We aimed to investigate network-broad learning for QI with outcome data. Methods In three obstetric care networks using individual-level PROM/PREM, a learning strategy for cyclic QI based on aggregated outcome data was developed, implemented and evaluated. The strategy included clinical, patient-reported, and professional-reported data; together translated into cases for interprofessional discussion. This study's data generation (including focus groups, surveys, observations) and analysis were guided by a theoretical model for network collaboration. Results The learning sessions identified opportunities and actions to improve quality and continuity of perinatal care. Professionals valued the data (especially patient-reported) combined with in-dept interprofessional discussion. Main challenges were professionals' time constraints, data infrastructure, and embedding improvement actions. Network-readiness for QI depended on trustful collaboration through connectivity and consensual leadership. Joint QI required information exchange and support including time and resources. Conclusions Current fragmented healthcare organization poses barriers for network-broad QI with outcome data, but also offers opportunities for learning strategies. Furthermore, joint learning could improve collaboration to catalyse the journey towards integrated, value-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Louise Depla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna W. Kersten
- Department of Public Health, Julius Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Lamain-de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle Jambroes
- Department of Public Health, Julius Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge M. Evers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Bettine Pluut
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Immink MM, van Zoonen K, Jager NM, Pluijmaekers AJM, de Melker HE, van der Maas NAT, Bekker MN. Maternal vaccination against pertussis as part of the national immunization program: a qualitative evaluation among obstetric care providers one year after the implementation in December 2019. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:311. [PMID: 36998072 PMCID: PMC10062680 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09274-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunization of pregnant women with a tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is an effective and safe way to protect infants from pertussis before their primary vaccinations. Vaccine uptake among pregnant women is influenced by their care providers' attitudes toward maternal vaccination. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the maternal Tdap vaccination under the National Immunization Program of the Netherlands from the perspective of obstetric care providers. METHODS In this qualitative and explorative study, we conducted in-depth interviews by telephone with obstetric care providers who were selected from a pool of respondents (convenience sampling) to a questionnaire in a previous study. The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide that covered three aspects of the implementation strategy: providers' overall experience with the implementation of maternal Tdap vaccination in the Netherlands; implementation logistics and counseling, and pregnant women referrals to municipal Youth Healthcare Centers. The interviews were recorded, pseudonymized and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed according to the Thematic Analysis approach by two researchers independently in two phases of iterative coding, categorizing, reviewing and redefining until ultimately, emergent themes regarding maternal Tdap vaccination implementation were identified. RESULTS Interviews with 11 midwives and 5 OB-GYN physicians yielded 5 major themes regarding the Tdap vaccination implementation strategy: challenges throughout the implementation process, views on maternal Tdap vaccination, general versus tailored counseling, provider responsibilities in vaccine promotion, and impact of materials for information delivery. Participants indicated that to improve provider attitudes toward Tdap vaccination, its implementation requires clear and transparent information about what is entailed, i.e., what is expected from obstetric care providers, how they can obtain information, and when their actions must be initiated. Participants demanded involvement throughout the implementation planning process. They preferred tailored communication with pregnant women over a generalized approach. CONCLUSION This study emphasized the importance of involving all relevant healthcare professionals in planning the implementation of maternal Tdap vaccination. Possible barriers perceived by these professionals should be taken into account in order to improve their attitudes toward vaccination, thus to increase uptake among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands.
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Kim van Zoonen
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Nina M Jager
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Anne J M Pluijmaekers
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van de Meent M, Kleuskens DG, Ganzevoort W, Gordijn SJ, Kooi EMW, Onland W, van Rijn BB, Duvekot JJ, Kornelisse RF, Al-Nasiry S, Jellema RK, Knol HM, Manten GTR, Mulder-de Tollenaer SM, Derks JB, Groenendaal F, Bekker MN, Schuit E, Lely AT, Kooiman J. OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070729. [PMID: 36931680 PMCID: PMC10030622 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively when administered within 1 week preceding delivery. Optimal timing of CCS administration is challenging in early-onset FGR, as the exact onset and course of fetal hypoxia are unpredictable. International guidelines do not provide a directive on this topic. In the Netherlands, two timing strategies are commonly practiced: administration of CCS when the umbilical artery shows (A) a pulsatility index above the 95thh centile and (B) absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (a more progressed disease state). This study aims to (1) use practice variation to compare CCS timing strategies in early-onset FGR on fetal and neonatal outcomes and (2) develop a dynamic tool to predict the time interval in days until delivery, as a novel timing strategy for antenatal CCS in early-onset FGR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentre, retrospective cohort study will be performed including pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in six tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands in the period between 2012 and 2021 (estimated sample size n=1800). Main exclusion criteria are multiple pregnancies and fetal congenital or genetic abnormalities. Routinely collected data will be extracted from medical charts. Primary outcome for the comparison of the two CCS timing strategies is a composite of perinatal, neonatal and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include the COSGROVE core outcome set for FGR. A multivariable, mixed-effects model will be used to compare timing strategies on study outcomes. Primary outcome for the dynamic prediction tool is 'days until birth'. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The need for ethical approval was waived by the Ethics Committee (University Medical Center Utrecht). Results will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and disseminated by presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05606497.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette van de Meent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Dianne G Kleuskens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wessel Ganzevoort
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sanne J Gordijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M W Kooi
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Wes Onland
- Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bas B van Rijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes J Duvekot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Salwan Al-Nasiry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Reint K Jellema
- Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - H Marieke Knol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan B Derks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ewoud Schuit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - A Titia Lely
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Judith Kooiman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Laureij LT, Depla AL, Kariman SS, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Ernst-Smelt HE, Hazelzet JA, Franx A, Bekker MN. Women's experiences with using patient-reported outcome and experience measures in routine perinatal care in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064452. [PMID: 36898740 PMCID: PMC10008176 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To gain insight into the experiences of women with completing and discussing patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and tailoring their care based on their outcomes. DESIGN A mixed-methods prospective cohort study. SETTING Seven obstetric care networks in the Netherlands that implemented a set of patient-centred outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth (PCB set), published by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. PARTICIPANTS All women, receiving the PROM and PREM questionnaires as part of their routine perinatal care, received an invitation for a survey (n=460) and an interview (n=16). The results of the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics; thematic inductive content analysis was applied on the data from open text answers and the interviews. RESULTS More than half of the survey participants (n=255) felt the need to discuss the outcomes of PROM and PREM with their care professionals. The time spent on completing questionnaires and the comprehensiveness of the questions was scored 'good' by most of the survey participants. From the interviews, four main themes were identified: content of the PROM and PREM questionnaires, application of these outcomes in perinatal care, discussing PREM and data capture tool. Important facilitators included awareness of health status, receiving personalised care based on their outcomes and the relevance of discussing PREM 6 months post partum. Barriers were found in insufficient information about the goal of PROM and PREM for individual care, technical problems in data capture tools and discrepancy between the questionnaire topics and the care pathway. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that women found the PCB set an acceptable and useful instrument for symptom detection and personalised care up until 6 months post partum. This patient evaluation of the PCB set has several implications for practice regarding the questionnaire content, role of care professionals and congruity with care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyzette T Laureij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne L Depla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Shariva S Kariman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Lamain-de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hiske E Ernst-Smelt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Depla AL, Pluut B, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Kersten AW, Evers IM, Franx A, Bekker MN. PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:26. [PMID: 36894797 PMCID: PMC9998006 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the transition towards value-based healthcare, patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) are recommended by international collaborations and government programs to guide clinical practice and quality improvement. For many conditions, using PROM/PREM over the complete continuum of care requires implementation across care organizations and disciplines. Along PROM/PREM implementation in obstetric care networks (OCN), we aimed to evaluate implementation outcomes and the processes influencing these outcomes in the complex context of care networks across the continuum of perinatal care. METHODS Three OCN in the Netherlands implemented PROM/PREM in routine practice, using an internationally developed outcomes set with care professionals and patient advocates. Their aim was to use PROM/PREM results individually to guide patient-specific care decisions and at group-level to improve quality of care. The implementation process was designed following the principles of action research: iteratively planning implementation, action, data generation and reflection to refine subsequent actions, involving both researchers and care professionals. During the one-year implementation period in each OCN, implementation outcomes and processes were evaluated in this mixed-methods study. Data generation (including observation, surveys and focus groups) and analysis were guided by two theoretical implementation frameworks: the Normalization Process Theory and Proctor's taxonomy for implementation outcomes. Qualitative findings were supplemented with survey data to solidify findings in a broader group of care professionals. RESULTS Care professionals in OCN found the use of PROM/PREM acceptable and appropriate, recognized their benefits and felt facilitated in their patient-centered goals and vision. However, feasibility for daily practice was low, mainly due to IT issues and time constraints. Hence PROM/PREM implementation did not sustain, but strategies for future PROM/PREM implementation were formulated in all OCN. Processes contributing positively to implementation outcomes were internalization (understand the value) and initiation (driven by key-participants), whereas challenges in relational integration (maintain confidence) and reconfiguration (refine activities) affected implementation negatively. CONCLUSION Although implementation did not sustain, network-broad PROM/PREM use in clinic and quality improvement matched professionals' motivation. This study provides recommendations to implement PROM/PREM meaningfully in practice in ways that support professionals in their drive towards patient-centered care. In order for PROM/PREM to fulfill their potential for value-based healthcare, our work highlights the need for sustainable IT infrastructures, as well as an iterative approach to refine their complex implementation into local contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L Depla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bettine Pluut
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Lamain-de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna W Kersten
- Department of Public Health, Julius Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge M Evers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lannoo L, van der Meij KRM, Bekker MN, De Catte L, Deckers S, Devriendt K, Roggen N, Galjaard RJH, Gitsels-van der Wal J, Macville MVE, Martin L, Sistermans EA, Van Calsteren K, Van Keirsbilck J, Crombag N, Henneman L. A cross-country comparison of pregnant women's decision-making and perspectives when opting for non-invasive prenatal testing in the Netherlands and Belgium. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:294-303. [PMID: 36740754 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Netherlands and Belgium have been among the first countries to offer non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier screening test. Despite similarities, differences exist in counseling modalities and test uptake. This study explored decision-making and perspectives of pregnant women who opted for NIPT in both countries. METHODS A questionnaire study was performed among pregnant women in the Netherlands (NL) (n = 587) and Belgium (BE) (n = 444) opting for NIPT, including measures on informed choice, personal and societal perspectives on trisomy 21, 18 and 13 and pregnancy termination. RESULTS Differences between Dutch and Belgian women were shown in the level of informed choice (NL: 83% vs. BE: 59%, p < 0.001), intention to terminate the pregnancy in case of confirmed trisomy 21 (NL: 51% vs. BE: 62%, p = 0.003) and trisomy 13/18 (NL: 80% vs. BE: 73%, p = 0.020). More Belgian women considered trisomy 21 a severe condition (NL: 64% vs. BE: 81%, p < 0.001). Belgian women more frequently indicated that they believed parents are judged for having a child with trisomy 21 (BE: 42% vs. NL: 16%, p < 0.001) and were less positive about quality of care and support for children with trisomy 21 (BE: 23% vs. NL: 62%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Differences in women's decision-making regarding NIPT and the conditions screened for may be influenced by counseling aspects and country-specific societal and cultural contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Lannoo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetomaternal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karuna R M van der Meij
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luc De Catte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetomaternal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sarah Deckers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetomaternal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koenraad Devriendt
- Department of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nele Roggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AZ Imelda, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merryn V E Macville
- Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kristel Van Calsteren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetomaternal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bekker MN, Koster MPH, Keusters WR, Ganzevoort W, de Haan-Jebbink JM, Deurloo KL, Seeber L, van der Ham DP, Zuithoff NPA, Frederix GWJ, van den Heuvel JFM, Franx A. Home telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands: a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (HoTeL). Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e116-e124. [PMID: 36828605 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00231-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with complicated pregnancies often require hospital admission. Telemonitoring at home is a promising alternative that fulfils a worldwide need in obstetric health care. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the transformation to digital care. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, clinical effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and costs of home telemonitoring against hospital care in complicated pregnancies. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial in six hospitals (four general teaching hospitals and two university hospitals) in the Netherlands (located in Utrecht, Amsterdam, and Groningen). Women aged 18 years and older with singleton pregnancies (>26 weeks gestation) requiring monitoring for pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, fetal anomaly, preterm rupture of membranes, reduced fetal movements, or history of fetal death were included in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to either hospital admission or telemonitoring in (1:1), stratified for the six diagnoses for inclusion and the six centres of inclusion, using block randomisation (block sizes of four and six). When assigned to telemonitoring, participants went home with devices for cardiotocography and blood pressure measurements and had daily contact with their care providers after digitally sending their home measurements. When assigned to hospital admission, participants received care as usual on the ward until the postpartum period. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes assessed after delivery, including mortality; an Apgar score below 7 after 5 min or an umbilical arterial pH at birth below 7·05; maternal morbidity; admission of the newborn to the neonatal intensive care unit; and rate of caesarean section. The primary outcome was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome was a 10% absolute increase in composite primary endpoint based on baseline 20% incidence. The study was registered at the Dutch Trial Registration (NL5888) and is now closed to new participants. FINDINGS From Dec 1, 2016, to Nov 30, 2019, 201 pregnant women were randomly assigned to an intervention procedure. 101 women were allocated to the telemonitoring group and 100 to the hospital admission group. One participant in the telemonitoring group withdrew consent before the intervention was initiated, and 100 participants were analysed for the primary outcome. In the hospital admission group, four participants did not receive the allocated intervention because they did not accept hospital admission. 100 participants in each group were analysed for the primary outcome according to the intention-to-treat principal. No participants were lost to follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 31 (31%) of 100 participants in the telemonitoring group and in 40 (40%) of 100 participants in the hospital admission group. Adjusted for centre of inclusion, diagnosis, and nulliparity, the risk difference in primary outcome between both groups was 10·3% (95% CI -22·4 to 2·2) lower in the telemonitoring group, below the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 10% absolute increase. A similar distribution for each of the individual components within the composite primary outcome was seen between groups. Five serious adverse events were reported: one neonatal death in the hospital admission group, in addition to one intra-uterine fetal death, two neonatal deaths, and one case of eclampsia in the telemonitoring group, all unrelated to the study. INTERPRETATION This non-inferiority trial shows the first evidence that telemonitoring might be as safe as hospital admission for monitoring complicated pregnancies. FUNDING Stichting Achmea Gezondheidszorg and ICT Healthcare Technology Solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Maria P H Koster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willem R Keusters
- Department of Julius Center, Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wessel Ganzevoort
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jiska M de Haan-Jebbink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen L Deurloo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Laura Seeber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - David P van der Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P A Zuithoff
- Department of Julius Center, Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Department of Julius Center, Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Becking EC, Linthorst J, Patton S, Gutowska-Ding W, Goodall R, Khawaja F, Morgan F, Deans Z, Chitty LS, Bekker MN, Scheffer PG, Sistermans EA. Variability in Fetal Fraction Estimation: Comparing Fetal Fractions Reported by Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Providers Globally. Clin Chem 2023; 69:160-167. [PMID: 36576352 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fetal fraction (FF) measurement is considered important for reliable noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Using minimal FF threshold as a quality parameter is under debate. We evaluated the variability in reported FFs of individual samples between providers and laboratories and within a single laboratory. METHODS Genomic quality assessment and European Molecular Genetics Quality Network provide joint proficiency testing for NIPT. We compared reported FFs across all laboratories and stratified according to test methodologies. A single sample was sequenced repeatedly and FF estimated by 2 bioinformatics methods: Veriseq2 and SeqFF. Finally, we compared FFs by Veriseq and SeqFF in 87 351 NIPT samples. RESULTS For each proficiency test sample we observed a large variability in reported FF, SDs and CVs ranging from 1.7 to 3.6 and 17.0 to 35.8, respectively. FF measurements reported by single nucleotide polymorphism-based methods had smaller SDs (0.5 to 2.4) compared to whole genome sequencing-based methods (1.8 to 2.9). In the internal quality assessment, SDs were similar between SeqFF (SD 1.0) and Veriseq v2 (SD 0.9), but mean FF by Veriseq v2 was higher compared to SeqFF (9.0 vs 6.4, P 0.001). In patient samples, reported FFs were on average 1.12-points higher in Veriseq than in SeqFF (P 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Current methods do not allow for a reliable and consistent FF estimation. Our data show estimated FF should be regarded as a laboratory-specific range, rather than a precise number. Applying strict universal minimum thresholds might result in unnecessary test failures and should be used with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis C Becking
- Department of Obstetrics, Division of Women and Baby, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Linthorst
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Patton
- Manchester Science Park, EMQN CIC, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Farrah Khawaja
- Genomics Quality Assessment, NHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fiona Morgan
- Genomics Quality Assessment, NHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Zandra Deans
- Genomics Quality Assessment, NHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust and Genetics and Genomics, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Division of Women and Baby, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G Scheffer
- Department of Obstetrics, Division of Women and Baby, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Immink MM, Kemmeren JM, Broeders L, Bekker MN, de Melker HE, Sanders EAM, van der Maas NAT. Reactogenicity and safety of second trimester maternal tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccination in the Netherlands. Vaccine 2023; 41:1074-1080. [PMID: 36604217 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccination is offered to all pregnant women during their second trimester in the Netherlands since December 2019. We assessed second trimester Tdap vaccination reactogenicity and compared with third trimester data from a similar study. For safety assessment, adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared with national data from 2018, before Tdap vaccine-introduction. METHODS Pregnant women were included between August 2019-December 2021 and received Tdap vaccination between 20 and 24w gestational age (GA). Participants completed a questionnaire on solicited local reactions and systemic adverse events (AEs) within one week after vaccination. Results were compared with historical data on reactogenicity from women vaccinated between 30 and 33w GA (n = 58). Regarding safety-related outcomes, each participant was matched to four unvaccinated pregnant women from the Dutch Perinatal Registry, based on living area, parity and age. RESULTS Among 723 participants who completed the questionnaire, 488 (67.5 %) experienced ≥ 1 local reaction with pain at the injection site as most reported reaction (62.3 %), and 460 (63.6 %) experienced ≥ 1 systemic AE with stiffness in muscles/joints (38.9 %), fatigue (28.9 %), headache (14.5 %) and common cold-like symptoms (11.0 %) most frequently reported. 4 women (0.6 %) reported fever (≥38.0˚C). Symptoms were considered mild and transient within days. No difference in AEs were found between vaccination at 20-24w versus 30-33w GA. 723 participants were matched to 2,424 unvaccinated pregnant women with no increased rates of premature labor, small-for-gestational-age, or other adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Second trimester maternal Tdap vaccination appears safe and well-tolerated. Comparison between second versus third trimester vaccination yielded no reactogenicity concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanet M Kemmeren
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Broeders
- The Dutch Perinatal Registry, Perined, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Caspi Y, de Zwarte SMC, Iemenschot IJ, Lumbreras R, de Heus R, Bekker MN, Hulshoff Pol H. Automatic measurements of fetal intracranial volume from 3D ultrasound scans. Front Neuroimaging 2022; 1:996702. [PMID: 37555155 PMCID: PMC10406279 DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.996702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Three-dimensional fetal ultrasound is commonly used to study the volumetric development of brain structures. To date, only a limited number of automatic procedures for delineating the intracranial volume exist. Hence, intracranial volume measurements from three-dimensional ultrasound images are predominantly performed manually. Here, we present and validate an automated tool to extract the intracranial volume from three-dimensional fetal ultrasound scans. The procedure is based on the registration of a brain model to a subject brain. The intracranial volume of the subject is measured by applying the inverse of the final transformation to an intracranial mask of the brain model. The automatic measurements showed a high correlation with manual delineation of the same subjects at two gestational ages, namely, around 20 and 30 weeks (linear fitting R2(20 weeks) = 0.88, R2(30 weeks) = 0.77; Intraclass Correlation Coefficients: 20 weeks=0.94, 30 weeks = 0.84). Overall, the automatic intracranial volumes were larger than the manually delineated ones (84 ± 16 vs. 76 ± 15 cm3; and 274 ± 35 vs. 237 ± 28 cm3), probably due to differences in cerebellum delineation. Notably, the automated measurements reproduced both the non-linear pattern of fetal brain growth and the increased inter-subject variability for older fetuses. By contrast, there was some disagreement between the manual and automatic delineation concerning the size of sexual dimorphism differences. The method presented here provides a relatively efficient way to delineate volumes of fetal brain structures like the intracranial volume automatically. It can be used as a research tool to investigate these structures in large cohorts, which will ultimately aid in understanding fetal structural human brain development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaron Caspi
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sonja M. C. de Zwarte
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Iris J. Iemenschot
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Raquel Lumbreras
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Roel de Heus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hilleke Hulshoff Pol
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bardi F, Bet BB, Pajkrt E, Linskens IH, Bekker MN, Sistermans EA, Bilardo CM, Elvan‐Taşpınar A. Additional value of advanced ultrasonography in pregnancies with two inconclusive cell-free DNA draws. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:1358-1367. [PMID: 36097374 PMCID: PMC9828350 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the additional value of advanced fetal anatomical assessment by ultrasound in pregnancies with twice inconclusive noninvasive testing (NIPT) due to low fetal fraction (FF). METHODS We performed a multicenter-retrospective study between 2017 and 2020 including 311 pregnancies with twice inconclusive NIPT due to low FF ≤ 1%. Women were offered invasive testing and advanced fetal anatomical assessment at ≤18 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound findings, genetic testing, and pregnancy/postnatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Ninety-two/311 (29.6%) women underwent invasive testing. Structural anomalies were diagnosed in 13/311 (4.2%) pregnancies (nine at the first scan and four at follow-up). In 6/13 (46.2%) cases, genetic aberrations were confirmed (one case of Trisomy 13 (detectable by NIPT), two of Triploidy, one of 16q12-deletion, HCN4-mutation and UPD(16) (nondetectable by NIPT). Genetic aberrations were found in 4/298 (1.3%) structurallynormal pregnancies (one 47XYY, two microscopic aberrations, one monogenic disorder found postpartum). Structural anomalies in genetically normal fetuses (2.0%) were not more prevalent compared to the general pregnant population (OR 1.0 [0.4-2.2]). CONCLUSION In pregnancies with twice inconclusive NIPT due to low FF, fetal structural anomalies are not more prevalent than in the general obstetric population. The detailed anatomical assessment has the added value to detect phenotypical features suggestive of chromosomal/genetic aberrations and identify pregnancies where advanced genetic testing may be indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Bardi
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Bo B. Bet
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAmsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and DevelopmentAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAmsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and DevelopmentAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg H. Linskens
- Amsterdam Reproduction and DevelopmentAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Erik A. Sistermans
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research InstituteAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Caterina M. Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAmsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and DevelopmentAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Ayten Elvan‐Taşpınar
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Vor L, Beudeker CR, Flier A, Scheepmaker LM, Aerts PC, Vijlbrief DC, Bekker MN, Beurskens FJ, van Kessel KPM, de Haas CJC, Rooijakkers SHM, van der Flier M. Monoclonal antibodies effectively potentiate complement activation and phagocytosis of Staphylococcus epidermidis in neonatal human plasma. Front Immunol 2022; 13:933251. [PMID: 35967335 PMCID: PMC9372458 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.933251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) with Staphylococcus epidermidis are a major cause of morbidity in neonates, who have an increased risk of infection because of their immature immune system. As especially preterm neonates suffer from antibody deficiency, clinical studies into preventive therapies have thus far focused on antibody supplementation with pooled intravenous immunoglobulins from healthy donors (IVIG) but with little success. Here we study the potential of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against S. epidermidis to induce phagocytic killing by human neutrophils. Nine different mAbs recognizing Staphylococcal surface components were cloned and expressed as human IgG1s. In binding assays, clones rF1, CR5133 and CR6453 showed the strongest binding to S. epidermidis ATCC14990 and CR5133 and CR6453 bound the majority of clinical isolates from neonatal sepsis (19 out of 20). To study the immune-activating potential of rF1, CR5133 and CR6453, bacteria were opsonized with mAbs in the presence or absence of complement. We observed that activation of the complement system is essential to induce efficient phagocytosis of S. epidermidis. Complement activation and phagocytic killing could be enhanced by Fc-mutations that improve IgG1 hexamerization on cellular surfaces. Finally, we studied the ability of the mAbs to activate complement in r-Hirudin neonatal plasma conditions. We show that classical pathway complement activity in plasma isolated from neonatal cord blood is comparable to adult levels. Furthermore, mAbs could greatly enhance phagocytosis of S. epidermidis in neonatal plasma. Altogether, our findings provide insights that are crucial for optimizing anti-S. epidermidis mAbs as prophylactic agents for neonatal CLABSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne de Vor
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Coco R. Beudeker
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Flier
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lisette M. Scheepmaker
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Piet C. Aerts
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Daniel C. Vijlbrief
- Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Kok P. M. van Kessel
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Carla J. C. de Haas
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel van der Flier
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Michiel van der Flier,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Moes SL, Depmann M, Lely TA, Bekker MN. Telemonitoring for COVID-19 positive pregnant women; feasibility and user experience of SAFE@home Corona: prospective pilot study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:556. [PMID: 35818039 PMCID: PMC9272876 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04878-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 has catalysed digital innovations enabling remote healthcare. Pregnant women are at increased risk for severe course of COVID-19 infection. Also, the pandemic has a negative emotional impact on pregnant women as they worry about their own health and the health of their unborn child. We developed a telemonitoring platform called SAFE@home-corona consisting of a pulse oximeter and an app with symptom checklist. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility, defined by compliance to the platform and by monitoring the course of COVID-19, patient satisfaction and user experience of a telemonitoring platform in COVID-19 positive pregnant women in the Netherlands. Methods We conducted a prospective pilot study among Dutch-speaking COVID-19 symptomatic pregnant women. Women were asked to monitor their oxygen-saturation with a pulse oximeter and COVID-related complaints with an in-app questionnaire daily. Oxygen-saturation and complaints were monitored by the Medical Management Centre with triage protocol. COVID-19, pregnancy, and user experience data were collected. To assess feasibility, compliance of daily self-monitoring and compliance of all intended measurements were calculated. Severity of COVID-19 was assessed via the platform and medical record. Patient satisfaction and user experience were measured through a self-developed questionnaire. Results Twenty-eight women were eligible of which 27 (93.1%) completed the study. Compliance of daily measurement and all intended measurements was high with 98.9 and 93.9%, respectively. Six women were hospitalized, of whom one to the intensive care unit. Overall, women indicated high satisfaction scores, varying from 8 to 10/10. Women were more concerned for the health of their unborn child or family then for themselves (66.7%). They stated that the platform offered reassurance. Patients would highly recommend the platform to pregnant peers during COVID infection. Conclusions This pilot study demonstrated feasibility of the SAFE@home-corona platform for self-monitoring COVID-19 course in pregnant women. Patients were satisfied, it offered reassurance, women would recommend use to peers. Upscaling the platform is needed to draw conclusions from the early signalling abilities and to keep evaluating patient satisfaction. The platform has great potential for self-monitoring of COVID-19 and possibly other pulmonary infections in pregnant women. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04878-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinta L Moes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Depmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Titia A Lely
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Prooyen Schuurman L, Sistermans EA, Van Opstal D, Henneman L, Bekker MN, Bax CJ, Pieters MJ, Bouman K, de Munnik S, den Hollander NS, Diderich KE, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Go AT, Hoffer MJ, Joosten M, Komdeur FL, Lichtenbelt KD, Lombardi MP, Polak MG, Jehee FS, Schuring-Blom H, Stevens SJ, Srebniak MI, Suijkerbuijk RF, Tan-Sindhunata GM, van der Meij KR, van Maarle MC, Vernimmen V, van Zelderen-Bhola SL, van Ravesteyn NT, Knapen MF, Macville MV, Galjaard RJH. Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study. Am J Hum Genet 2022; 109:1344. [PMID: 35803237 PMCID: PMC9300874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
|
26
|
Depla AL, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Laureij LT, Ernst-Smelt HE, Hazelzet JA, Franx A, Bekker MN. Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e37725. [PMID: 35787519 PMCID: PMC9297146 DOI: 10.2196/37725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement has published a set of patient-centered outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth (PCB set), including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). To establish value-based pregnancy and childbirth care, the PCB set was implemented in the Netherlands, using the outcomes on the patient level for shared decision-making and on an aggregated level for quality improvement. Objective This study aims to report first outcomes, experiences, and practice insights of implementing the PCB set in clinical practice. Methods In total, 7 obstetric care networks across the Netherlands, each consisting of 1 or 2 hospitals and multiple community midwifery practices (ranging in number from 2 to 18), implemented the PROM and PREM domains of the PCB set as part of clinical routine. This observational study included all women participating in the clinical project. PROMs and PREMs were assessed with questionnaires at 5 time points: 2 during pregnancy and 3 post partum. Clinical threshold values (alerts) supported care professionals interpreting the answers, indicating possibly alarming outcomes per domain. Data collection took place from February 2020 to September 2021. Data analysis included missing (pattern) analysis, sum scores, alert rates, and sensitivity analysis. Results In total, 1923 questionnaires were collected across the 5 time points: 816 (42.43%) at T1 (first trimester), 793 (41.23%) at T2 (early third trimester), 125 (6.5%) at T3 (maternity week), 170 (8.84%) at T4 (6 weeks post partum), and 19 (1%) at T5 (6 months post partum). Of these, 84% (1615/1923) were filled out completely. Missing items per domain ranged from 0% to 13%, with the highest missing rates for depression, pain with intercourse, and experience with pain relief at birth. No notable missing patterns were found. For the PROM domains, relatively high alert rates were found both in pregnancy and post partum for incontinence (469/1798, 26.08%), pain with intercourse (229/1005, 22.79%), breastfeeding self-efficacy (175/765, 22.88%), and mother-child bonding (122/288, 42.36%). Regarding the PREM domains, the highest alert rates were found for birth experience (37/170, 21.76%), shared decision-making (101/982, 10.29%), and discussing pain relief ante partum (310/793, 39.09%). Some domains showed very little clinical variation; for example, role of the mother and satisfaction with care. Conclusions The PCB set is a useful tool to assess patient-reported outcomes and experiences that need to be addressed over the whole course of pregnancy and childbirth. Our results provide opportunities to improve and personalize perinatal care. Furthermore, we could propose several recommendations regarding methods and timeline of measurements based on our findings. This study supports the implementation of the PCB set in clinical practice, thereby advancing the transformation toward patient-centered, value-based health care for pregnancy and childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Louise Depla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhemina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marije Lamain-de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhemina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lyzette T Laureij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hiske E Ernst-Smelt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan A Hazelzet
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhemina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
van Prooyen Schuurman L, Sistermans EA, Van Opstal D, Henneman L, Bekker MN, Bax CJ, Pieters MJ, Bouman K, de Munnik S, den Hollander NS, Diderich KE, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Go AT, Hoffer MJ, Joosten M, Komdeur FL, Lichtenbelt KD, Lombardi MP, Polak MG, Jehee FS, Schuring-Blom H, Stevens SJ, Srebniak MI, Suijkerbuijk RF, Tan-Sindhunata GM, van der Meij KR, van Maarle MC, Vernimmen V, van Zelderen-Bhola SL, van Ravesteyn NT, Knapen MF, Macville MV, Galjaard RJH. Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study. Am J Hum Genet 2022; 109:1140-1152. [PMID: 35659929 PMCID: PMC9247828 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weight <2.3rd percentile (13.6% [24/177] vs 2.5% [3,892/155,491]; RR 5.5) were significantly increased compared to the general obstetric population. Of the 90 maternal findings, 12 (13.3%) were malignancies and 32 (35.6%) (mosaic) pathogenic copy number variants, mostly associated with mild or no clinical phenotypes. Data from this large cohort study provide crucial information for deciding if and how to implement GW-NIPT in screening programs. Additionally, these data can inform the challenging interpretation, counseling, and follow-up of additional findings.
Collapse
|
28
|
Landman AJEMC, de Boer MA, Visser L, Nijman TAJ, Hemels MAC, Naaktgeboren CN, van der Weide MC, Mol BW, van Laar JOEH, Papatsonis DNM, Bekker MN, van Drongelen J, van Pampus MG, Sueters M, van der Ham DP, Sikkema JM, Zwart JJ, Huisjes AJM, van Huizen ME, Kleiverda G, Boon J, Franssen MTM, Hermes W, Visser H, de Groot CJM, Oudijk MA. Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1003892. [PMID: 35104279 PMCID: PMC8806064 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS AND FINDINGS We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anadeijda J. E. M. C. Landman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjon A. de Boer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Visser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tobias A. J. Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christiana N. Naaktgeboren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke C. van der Weide
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ben W. Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joris van Drongelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marieke Sueters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David P. van der Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J. Marko Sikkema
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Group Twente Almelo, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J. Zwart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Anjoke J. M. Huisjes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gunilla Kleiverda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flevo Hospital Almere, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Janine Boon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maureen T. M. Franssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wietske Hermes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Harry Visser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, the Netherlands
| | - Christianne J. M. de Groot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn A. Oudijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van den Heuvel JFM, Hogeveen M, Lutke Holzik M, van Heijst AFJ, Bekker MN, Geurtzen R. Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:7. [PMID: 34991580 PMCID: PMC8734286 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01735-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks of gestation, both early intensive care and palliative comfort care for the neonate are considered treatment options. Prenatal counseling, preferably using shared decision making, is needed to agree on the treatment option in case labor progresses. This article described the development of a digital decision aid (DA) to support pregnant women, partners and clinicians in prenatal counseling for imminent extreme premature labor.
Methods This DA is developed following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The Dutch treatment guideline and the Dutch recommendations for prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were used as basis. Development of the first prototype was done by expert clinicians and patients, further improvements were done after alpha testing with involved clinicians, patients and other experts (n = 12), and beta testing with non-involved clinicians and patients (n = 15). Results The final version includes information, probabilities and figures depending on users’ preferences. Furthermore, it elicits patient values and provides guidance to aid parents and professionals in making a decision for either early intensive care or palliative comfort care in threatening extreme premature delivery. Conclusion A decision aid was developed to support prenatal counseling regarding the decision on early intensive care versus palliative comfort care in case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks gestation. It was well accepted by parents and healthcare professionals. Our multimedia, digital DA is openly available online to support prenatal counseling and personalized, shared decision-making in imminent extreme premature labor. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01735-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephus F M van den Heuvel
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Hogeveen
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Code 804, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margo Lutke Holzik
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arno F J van Heijst
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Code 804, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosa Geurtzen
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Code 804, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Koppes DM, van Hees MSF, Koenders VM, Oudijk MA, Bekker MN, Franssen MTM, Smits LJ, Hermens R, van Kuijk SMJ, Scheepers HC. Nationwide implementation of a decision aid on vaginal birth after cesarean: a before and after cohort study. J Perinat Med 2021; 49:783-790. [PMID: 34049425 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Woman with a history of a previous cesarean section (CS) can choose between an elective repeat CS (ERCS) and a trial of labor (TOL), which can end in a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or an unplanned CS. Guidelines describe women's rights to make an informed decision between an ERCS or a TOL. However, the rates of TOL and vaginal birth after CS varies greatly between and within countries. The objective of this study is to asses nation-wide implementation of counselling with a decision aid (DA) including a prediction model, on intended delivery compared to care as usual. We hypothesize that this may result in a reduction in practice variation without an increase in cesarean rates or complications. METHODS In a multicenter controlled before and after cohort study we evaluate the effect of nation-wide implementation of a DA. Practice variation was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of TOL percentages. RESULTS A total of 27 hospitals and 1,364 women were included. A significant decrease was found in practice variation (SD TOL rates: 0.17 control group vs. 0.10 intervention group following decision aid implementation, p=0.011). There was no significant difference in the ERCS rate or overall CS rates. A 21% reduction in the combined maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes was seen. CONCLUSIONS Nationwide implementation of the DA showed a significant reduction in practice variation without an increase in the rate of cesarean section or complications, suggesting an improvement in equality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea M Koppes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Merel S F van Hees
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn A Oudijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen T M Franssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella Hermens
- Scientific Centre for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hubertina C Scheepers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Hoorn F, de Wit L, van Rossem L, Jambroes M, Groenendaal F, Kwee A, Lamain - de Ruiter M, Franx A, van Rijn BB, Koster MPH, Bekker MN. A prospective population-based multicentre study on the impact of maternal body mass index on adverse pregnancy outcomes: Focus on normal weight. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257722. [PMID: 34555090 PMCID: PMC8460045 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal body mass index (BMI) below or above the reference interval (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Whether BMI exerts an effect within the reference interval is unclear. Therefore, we assessed the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and BMI, in particular within the reference interval, in a general unselected pregnant population. Methods Data was extracted from a prospective population-based multicentre cohort (Risk Estimation for PrEgnancy Complications to provide Tailored care (RESPECT) study) conducted between December 2012 to January 2014. BMI was studied in categories (I: <18.5, II: 18.5–19.9, III: 20.0–22.9, IV: 23.0–24.9, V: 25.0–27.4, VI: 27.5–29.9, VII: >30.0 kg/m2) and as a continuous variable within the reference interval. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as composite endpoints for maternal, neonatal or any pregnancy complication, and for adverse pregnancy outcomes individually. Linear trends were assessed using linear-by-linear association analysis and (adjusted) relative risks by regression analysis. Results The median BMI of the 3671 included women was 23.2 kg/m2 (IQR 21.1–26.2). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were reported in 1256 (34.2%). Linear associations were observed between BMI categories and all three composite endpoints, and individually for pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates; but not for small-for-gestational-age neonates and preterm birth. Within the reference interval, BMI was associated with the composite maternal endpoint, PIH, GDM and LGA, with adjusted relative risks of 1.15 (95%CI 1.06–1.26), 1.12 (95%CI 1.00–1.26), 1.31 (95%CI 1.11–1.55) and 1.09 (95%CI 1.01–1.17). Conclusions Graded increase in maternal BMI appears to be an indicator of risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes even among women with a BMI within the reference interval. The extent to which BMI directly contributes to the increased risk in this group should be evaluated in order to determine strategies most valuable for promoting safety and long-term health for mothers and their offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fieke van Hoorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Leon de Wit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lenie van Rossem
- Department of Public Health, Healthcare Innovation, and Medical Humanities, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle Jambroes
- Department of Public Health, Healthcare Innovation, and Medical Humanities, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Kwee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Lamain - de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas B. van Rijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria P. H. Koster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van der Meij KRM, Kooij C, Bekker MN, Galjaard RJH, Henneman L. Non-invasive prenatal test uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1395-1400. [PMID: 34505288 PMCID: PMC9291196 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) is increasingly being implemented worldwide. In public health programs, equitable access to healthcare is a fundamental principle which also applies to fetal aneuploidy screening. However, the out-of-pocket costs of NIPT may lead to sociodemographic disparities in uptake of screening. This study assessed whether there is a difference in the uptake of NIPT in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods compared to all other neighborhoods in the Netherlands, where NIPT is implemented in a national screening program (TRIDENT-2 study). METHOD NIPT uptake, postal code and age of 156,562 pregnant women who received pre-test counselling for prenatal screening in 2018 were retrieved from the national prenatal screening database. Postal codes were used as a proxy to categorize neighborhoods as being either socioeconomically disadvantaged or other. The out-of-pocket costs for NIPT were €175. RESULTS NIPT uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods was 20.3% whereas uptake in all other neighborhoods was 47.6% (p < 0.001). The difference in NIPT uptake between socioeconomic disadvantaged neighborhoods and other areas was smaller for the youngest maternal age-group (≤25 years) compared to other age-groups. CONCLUSION The variation in uptake suggest underlying disparities in NIPT uptake, which undermines the goals of a national fetal aneuploidy screening program of providing reproductive autonomy and equitable access. This has ethical and policy implications for ensuring fair and responsible implementation of fetal aneuploidy screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna R M van der Meij
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Kooij
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Immink MM, Bekker MN, de Melker HE, Rots NY, Sanders EAM, van der Maas NAT. Study protocol of the PIMPI-project, a cohort study on acceptance, tolerability and immunogenicity of second trimester maternal pertussis immunization in relation to term and preterm infants. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:897. [PMID: 34479491 PMCID: PMC8414744 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06559-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal immunization confers passive immunity to the fetus by transplacental antibody transfer. Infants may be better protected against pertussis if the mother received a diphtheriae, tetanus and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination in the second trimester of pregnancy compared to the third trimester. This study evaluates IgG antibody concentrations in term and preterm infants at birth and 2 months after birth after maternal Tdap-vaccination between 200 and 240 w of gestation vs third trimester Tdap-vaccination. Further aims are assessing the determinants that underlie acceptance of second trimester maternal Tdap-vaccination as well as the tolerability of vaccination. Methods This prospective cohort study consists of two parts. In the acceptance part, pregnant women complete a questionnaire on determinants that underlie acceptance of a second trimester Tdap-vaccination, which is offered subsequently between 200 and 240 w of gestation. Vaccinated women complete an additional questionnaire on vaccination tolerability. Vaccinated women may also participate in the immunogenicity part, in which blood is drawn from mother at delivery and from infant at birth and 2 months after birth. Women are also eligible for the immunogenicity part if they received a Tdap-vaccination between 200 and 240 w of gestation via the national immunization program and get hospitalized for an imminent preterm delivery. Blood sampling continues until 60 term and 60 preterm mother-infant-pairs have been included. Pertussis-specific IgG antibody concentrations are determined in serum using a fluorescent bead-based multiplex immunoassay. For term infants, non-inferiority in IgG antibody concentrations against pertussis toxin (anti-PT) will be assessed referred to a historical control group in which mothers were Tdap-vaccinated between 300 and 320 w of gestation. For preterm infants, non-inferiority of anti-PT IgG concentrations is referred to as 85% of infants having ≥ 20 international units/mL at 2 months after birth. Discussion This study investigates acceptance, tolerability and immunogenicity regarding maternal Tdap-immunization between 200 and 240 w of gestation. Its results provide insight into the effects of second trimester Tdap-vaccination on IgG antibody concentrations in term and preterm infants before primary infant vaccinations. Results on acceptance and tolerability guide antenatal care providers in communication with pregnant women and maintain the safety of second trimester Tdap-vaccination. Trial registration: EU Clinical Trials Register, 2018-002976-41, retrospectively registered 24 July 2019, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2018-002976-41. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06559-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nynke Y Rots
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van den Heuvel JF, Titia Lely A, Huisman J, Trappenburg JC, Franx A, Bekker MN. Y-017. SAFE@HOME: Digital health platform facilitating a new care path for women at increased risk of preeclampsia – A case-control study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
35
|
van den Heuvel JF, van Lieshout C, Franx A, Frederix G, Bekker MN. P-089. SAFE@HOME: Cost analysis of a new care pathway including a digital health platform for women at increased risk of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.07.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
36
|
Geurtzen R, van den Heuvel JFM, Huisman JJ, Lutke Holzik EM, Bekker MN, Hogeveen M. Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret. J Perinatol 2021; 41:2201-2207. [PMID: 34285357 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01159-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe levels of perceived shared decision making (SDM), decisional conflict (DC), and decision regret (DR) in prenatal counseling by pregnant women, partners, neonatologists, and obstetricians regarding decision-making around imminent extreme premature birth in which a decision about palliative comfort care versus early intensive care had to be made. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, cross-sectional study using surveys to determine perceived SDM at imminent extreme premature birth in parents and physicians, and to determine DC and DR in parents. RESULTS In total, 73 participants from 22 prenatal counseling sessions were included (21 pregnant women, 20 partners, 14 obstetricians, 18 neonatologists). High perceived levels of SDM were found (median 82,2), and low levels of DC (median 23,4) and DR at one month (median 12, 5). CONCLUSIONS Reported levels of self-perceived SDM in the setting of prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were high, by both the parents and the physicians. Levels of DC and DR were low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Geurtzen
- Amalia Children's Hospital, department of neonatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - J F M van den Heuvel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J Huisman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E M Lutke Holzik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Hogeveen
- Amalia Children's Hospital, department of neonatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Becking EC, Wirjosoekarto SAM, Scheffer PG, Huiskes JVM, Remmelink MJ, Sistermans EA, Bax CJ, Weiss JM, Henneman L, Bekker MN. Low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: Analysis of a subcohort of the TRIDENT-2 study. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1296-1304. [PMID: 34426993 PMCID: PMC9293122 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the association between low fetal fraction (FF) in prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants of the TRIDENT‐2 study (Dutch nationwide government‐supported study offering cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidies) who received a failed test result due to low FF (<4%) between April 2017 until February 2018. Outcome measures included pregnancy‐induced hypertension (PIH), pre‐eclampsia (PE), small for gestational age neonates (SGA), spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), chromosomal aberrations, and congenital structural anomalies. Results Test failure due to low FF occurred in 295 women (1.12% of tests performed). Information regarding pregnancy outcomes was available for 96.3% of these women. The incidence of PIH, PE, SGA, sPTB, and GDM was 11.2%, 4.1%, 7.3%, 5.1%, and 14.8%, respectively. The prevalence of chromosomal aberrations and congenital structural anomalies was 1.4% and 4.1%, respectively. Incidences of PIH, PE ≥ 34 weeks of gestation, GDM, and prevalence of aneuploidy and congenital structural anomalies were higher in women with low FF compared to the general Dutch obstetric population. Conclusion Low FF is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The value of FF in the prediction of these outcomes needs to be further established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis C Becking
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter G Scheffer
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia V M Huiskes
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marinka J Remmelink
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline J Bax
- Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke M Weiss
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Garcia E, Henneman L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Martin L, Koopmanschap I, Bekker MN, Timmermans DRM. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women's views on good motherhood: a qualitative study. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 30:669-675. [PMID: 34400811 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00945-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Women's views on responsible motherhood influence decision-making regarding participation in prenatal screening. Previous studies showed that the probabilistic nature of the first-trimester combined test and the potential requirement for subsequent invasive diagnostics serve as legitimate reasons for women to exclude prenatal screening from their moral responsibilities. These moral barriers might now be less relevant with the introduction of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) resulting in women feeling a moral duty to use NIPT screening as part of responsible motherhood. This qualitative study explores the impact of NIPT on women's moral beliefs about the meaning of prenatal screening in relation to responsible motherhood. We performed semi-structured interviews with 29 pregnant women who were offered NIPT as a first-tier screening test within a Dutch nationwide study (TRIDENT-2). Results show that the inherent uncertainty about the fetus's health despite improved accuracy and the lack of treatment for a detected disorder, combined with the possibility to obtain information about actionable anomalies through the fetal anomaly scan, support women's perspectives that NIPT is not an obligation of responsible motherhood. Acceptance of NIPT is considered to be a free decision related to the information each woman needs to be a good mother for her child and her family. Women's views may change when NIPT has expanded to include treatable or preventable conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Garcia
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel Koopmanschap
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
van der Meij KRM, Njio A, Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Bekker MN, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, van der Ven AJEM, Kater-Kuipers A, Timmermans DRM, Sistermans EA, Galjaard RJH, Henneman L. Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women's perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 30:661-668. [PMID: 34385671 PMCID: PMC9177612 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00940-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the favorable test characteristics of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the screening of fetal aneuploidy, there has been a strong and growing demand for implementation. In the Netherlands, NIPT is offered within a governmentally supported screening program as a first-tier screening test for all pregnant women (TRIDENT-2 study). However, concerns have been raised that the test’s favorable characteristics might lead to uncritical use, also referred to as routinization. This study addresses women’s perspectives on prenatal screening with NIPT by evaluating three aspects related to routinization: informed choice, freedom to choose and (personal and societal) perspectives on Down syndrome. Nationwide, a questionnaire was completed by 751 pregnant women after receiving counseling for prenatal screening. Of the respondents, the majority (75.5%) made an informed choice for prenatal screening as measured by the multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC). Education level and religious affiliation were significant predictors of informed choice. The main reason to accept screening was “seeking reassurance” (25.5%), and the main reason to decline was “every child is welcome” (30.6%). The majority of respondents (87.7%) did not perceive societal pressure to test. Differences between test-acceptors and test-decliners in personal and societal perspectives on Down syndrome were found. Our study revealed high rates of informed decision-making and perceived freedom to choose regarding fetal aneuploidy screening, suggesting that there is little reason for concern about routinization of NIPT based on the perspectives of Dutch pregnant women. Our findings highlight the importance of responsible implementation of NIPT within a national screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna R M van der Meij
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annabel Njio
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Adriana Kater-Kuipers
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Scheffer PG, Wirjosoekarto SAM, Becking EC, Weiss MM, Bax CJ, Oepkes D, Sistermans EA, Henneman L, Bekker MN. Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1287-1295. [PMID: 34350596 PMCID: PMC9292009 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective Low fetal fraction (LFF) in prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing is an important cause of test failure and no‐call results. LFF might reflect early abnormal placentation and therefore be associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Here, we review the available literature on the relationship between LFF in cfDNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome. Method A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 1, 2020. Results Five studies met the criteria for inclusion; all were retrospective observational cohort studies. The cohort sizes ranged from 370 to 6375 pregnancies, with all tests performed in the first trimester or early second trimester. A 4% cutoff for LFF was used in two studies, two studies used the 5th and 25th percentiles, respectively, and one study used a variety of cutoff values for LFF. LFF in prenatal cfDNA testing was observed to be associated with hypertensive disease of pregnancy, small for gestational age neonates, and preterm birth. Conflicting results were found regarding the association between LFF and gestational diabetes mellitus. Conclusions LFF in cfDNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome,specifically pregnancy‐related hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and impaired fetal growth related to placental dysfunction. Since the available evidence is limited, a large prospective cohort study on the relationship between fetal fraction and pregnancy outcomes is needed.
What's already known about this topic?
Low fetal fraction (LFF) in prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing is an important cause of test failure and no‐call results and has been associated with aneuploidy LFF might also reflect early abnormal placentation and therefore be associated with adverse pregnancy outcome
What does this review add?
This review summarizes the available data on LFF in prenatal cfDNA testing and its relation to adverse pregnancy outcomes LFF was found to be associated with pregnancy‐related hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and impaired fetal growth related to placental dysfunction Since the available evidence is limited, a large prospective cohort study on the relationship between fetal fraction and pregnancy outcomes is needed
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Scheffer
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellis C Becking
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan M Weiss
- Department of Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline J Bax
- Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick Oepkes
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Heurn LJ, Coumans ABC, Derikx JPM, Bekker MN, Bilardo KM, Duin LK, Knapen MFCM, Pajkrt E, Sikkel E, van Heurn LWE, Oepkes D. Factors associated with poor outcome in fetuses prenatally diagnosed with sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1430-1438. [PMID: 34327722 PMCID: PMC9292788 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Outcome of fetuses, prenatally diagnosed with sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT), is still poorly documented. This study assesses the incidence and prenatal predictors of outcome in all fetuses prenatally diagnosed with SCT. METHODS This is a retrospective study on all fetuses prenatally diagnosed with SCT from 1998 to 2018 in the Netherlands. Poor outcome was defined as terminations of pregnancy (TOP) because of expected unfavorable outcome, intrauterine fetal death, or early neonatal death. Potential risk factors for poor outcome were analyzed. MAIN RESULTS Eighty-four fetuses were included. Sixteen (19.0%) TOPs were excluded from statistical analysis. Eleven of the remaining 68 fetuses had poor outcome. Overall mortality was 32.1%, with a mortality excluding TOPs of 13.1%. Thirteen fetal interventions were performed in 11 (13.1%) fetuses. Potential risk factors for poor outcome were the presence of fetal hydrops (OR: 21.0, CI: 2.6-275.1, p = 0.012) and cardiomegaly (OR: 10.3, CI: 1.9-55.8, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS The overall mortality of fetuses prenatally diagnosed with SCTs including tTOP was 32.1%. This high mortality rate was mainly due to termination of pregnancy. Mortality excluding TOP was 13.1%. Potential risk factors for poor outcome were fetal hydrops and cardiomegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke J van Heurn
- Department of P(a)ediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam & Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Audrey B C Coumans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joep P M Derikx
- Department of P(a)ediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam & Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katia M Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie K Duin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Prenatal Diagnosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F C M Knapen
- Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam & Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Sikkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L W Ernest van Heurn
- Department of P(a)ediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam & Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick Oepkes
- Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Maas VYF, Poels M, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Kwee A, Bekker MN, Franx A, Koster MPH. Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:492. [PMID: 34233654 PMCID: PMC8265143 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03935-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While the potential adverse outcomes of prenatal exposure to unhealthy lifestyle are widely evidenced, little is known about these exposures in the periconception period. We investigated the associations between lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes with a unique distinction between preconceptional- and prenatal lifestyle behaviours. Methods A secondary analysis took place within a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands, including 3,684 pregnant women. Baseline characteristics and preconceptional and first trimester lifestyle behaviours were assessed through a self-administered questionnaire in the first trimester. Adverse pregnancy outcomes (hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP), small for gestational age (SGA), gestational diabetes (GDM) and spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB)) were reported by healthcare professionals. Data were collected between 2012 and 2014 and analysed using multivariate logistic regression. Results Women who are overweight, and especially obese, have the highest odds of developing any adverse pregnancy outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.61 (95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 1.31–1.99) and aOR 2.85 (95 %CI 2.20–3.68), respectively), particularly HDP and GDM. Women who prenatally continued smoking attained higher odds for SGA (aOR 1.91 (95 %CI 1.05–1.15)) compared to the reference group, but these odds decreased when women prenatally quit smoking (aOR 1.14 (95 %CI 0.59–2.21)). Women who did not use folic acid supplements tended to have a higher odds of developing adverse pregnancy outcomes (aOR 1.28 (95 %CI 0.97–1.69)), while women who prenatally started folic acid supplements did not (aOR 1.01 (95 %CI 0.82–1.25)). Conclusions Our results indicate that smoking cessation, having a normal body mass index (BMI) and initiating folic acid supplements preconceptionally may decrease the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, intervening as early as the preconception period could benefit the health of future generations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03935-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronique Y F Maas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Poels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Research Agency Care2Research, Mattenbiesstraat 133, 1087GC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anneke Kwee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maria P H Koster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jongsma KR, Bekker MN, Haitjema S, Bredenoord AL. How digital health affects the patient-physician relationship: An empirical-ethics study into the perspectives and experiences in obstetric care. Pregnancy Hypertens 2021; 25:81-86. [PMID: 34090186 DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health technologies are believed to change the patient-physician relationship. Such changes are still speculative, as there are no studies in which both patients and health care professionals are asked for their experiences and perspectives on how digital health affects the patient-physician relationship. METHODS We performed a qualitative interview study (n = 25) to identify relevant aspects of the patient-physician relationship as perceived by both health care professionals (n = 14) and patients (n = 11) of a digital monitoring platform for hypertensive disorders related to pregnancy. We focus on roles, responsibilities and medical decision-making. RESULTS Digital monitoring helps patients to better understand their own condition and contributes to shared decision-making in terms of information exchange. Yet for clinical decision-making both patients and health care professionals argue that health care professionals should stay in the lead. The collected data is by some health care professionals considered hard data that allows objective and more standardized decision-making, while others believe digital monitoring requires further interpretation in order to personalize the clinical care to the patient. CONCLUSION Digital technologies have subtle, yet double-edged, effects on the patient-physician relationship in terms of roles and responsibilities and the value addressed to the digital data. These insights let to 6 ethical recommendations for the implementation of digital health technologies to replace and support clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R Jongsma
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - M N Bekker
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Haitjema
- Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
van Hoorn F, Koster MPH, Kwee A, Groenendaal F, Franx A, Bekker MN. Implementation of a first-trimester prognostic model to improve screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:298. [PMID: 33849467 PMCID: PMC8045273 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03749-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improvement in the accuracy of identifying women who are at risk to develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is warranted, since timely diagnosis and treatment improves the outcomes of this common pregnancy disorder. Although prognostic models for GDM are externally validated and outperform current risk factor based selective approaches, there is little known about the impact of such models in day-to-day obstetric care. Methods A prognostic model was implemented as a directive clinical prediction rule, classifying women as low- or high-risk for GDM, with subsequent distinctive care pathways including selective midpregnancy testing for GDM in high-risk women in a prospective multicenter birth cohort comprising 1073 pregnant women without pre-existing diabetes and 60 obstetric healthcare professionals included in nine independent midwifery practices and three hospitals in the Netherlands (effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 study). Model performance (c-statistic) and implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, sustainability) were evaluated after 6 months by indicators and implementation instruments (NoMAD; MIDI). Results The adherence to the prognostic model (c-statistic 0.85 (95%CI 0.81–0.90)) was 95% (n = 1021). Healthcare professionals scored 3.7 (IQR 3.3–4.0) on implementation instruments on a 5-point Likert scale. Important facilitators were knowledge, willingness and confidence to use the model, client cooperation and opportunities for reconfiguration. Identified barriers mostly related to operational and organizational issues. Regardless of risk-status, pregnant women appreciated first-trimester information on GDM risk-status and lifestyle advice to achieve risk reduction, respectively 89% (n = 556) and 90% (n = 564)). Conclusions The prognostic model was successfully implemented and well received by healthcare professionals and pregnant women. Prognostic models should be recommended for adoption in guidelines. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03749-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fieke van Hoorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, 3584 EA, the Netherlands
| | - Maria P H Koster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke Kwee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, 3584 EA, the Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, 3584 EA, the Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, 3584 EA, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, 3584 EA, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
van den Heuvel JFM, van Lieshout C, Franx A, Frederix G, Bekker MN. SAFE@HOME: Cost analysis of a new care pathway including a digital health platform for women at increased risk of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2021; 24:118-123. [PMID: 33813364 DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a cost analysis of the use of a new care pathway with a digital health platform for blood pressure telemonitoring for women at risk of preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN This is a cost analysis of a case-control study with women with chronic hypertension, history of preeclampsia, maternal cardiac or kidney disease at intake of pregnancy. Antenatal care with a reduced visit schedule and a digital health platform (SAFE@HOME, n = 97) was compared to a retrospective control group (n = 133) with usual care without self-monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Costs per pregnancy (€) of healthcare consumption of antenatal clinic visits, ultrasound assessments, antenatal admissions, laboratory and other diagnostic tests, and societal costs such as traveling and work absence. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and perinatal outcomes were similar between both groups. A significant reduction of antenatal visits, ultrasounds and hypertension-related admissions was associated with use of the digital platform. In the SAFE@HOME group, costs of antenatal care, including the costs of the digital platform, were 19.7% lower compared to the control group (median €3616 [IQR 3071 - 5329] vs €4504 [IQR 3515-6923], p = 0.001). Total costs per pregnancy, including societal costs, were also reduced (€7485 [IQR 6338-10,173] vs €9150, [IQR 7546-12,286] p < 0.001). Each euro invested in the platform saved on average €8 of antenatal care resources. CONCLUSION The use of a digital platform for blood pressure and symptom monitoring in antenatal care for high-risk women is associated with lower costs compared to conventional care, while observed maternal and neonatal outcomes are similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephus F M van den Heuvel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Christiaan van Lieshout
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Lundlaan 6, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Depla AL, Crombag NM, Franx A, Bekker MN. Implementation of a standard outcome set in perinatal care: a qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators from all stakeholder perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:113. [PMID: 33530989 PMCID: PMC7852077 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06121-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve their quality, healthcare systems are increasingly focused on value delivered to patients. For perinatal care, the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) proposed a patient-centred outcome set with both clinical and patient-reported measures for pregnancy and childbirth (PCB set). This study aimed to identify factors that affect the implementation of the PCB set at the pre-implementation stage, using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). METHODS In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews amongst a purposive sample of key stakeholders within an obstetric care network (OCN): 1) patients, 2) perinatal care professionals involved in the full cycle of perinatal care, and 3) policy makers, including hospital managers, administrative staff and health care insurers. While the CFIR guided data capture and structuring, thematic analysis revealed overarching themes that best reflected the barriers and facilitators from different stakeholder perspectives. Within these overarching themes, the CFIR constructs were maintained. RESULTS Interviews were conducted with 6 patients, 16 professionals and 5 policy makers. Thematic analysis supported by the CFIR framework identified four main themes: the instrument and its implementation process, use in individual patient care, use in quality improvement, and the context of the OCN. Important barriers included professional workload, data reliability, and interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration. Potential facilitators were the PCB set's direct value in individual care, interprofessional feedback and education, and aligning with existing systems. Prominent variations between stakeholder groups included the expected patient burden, the level of use, transparency of outcomes and the degree of integrated care. CONCLUSIONS This study clarified critical factors that affect successful implementation of the PCB set in perinatal care. Practice recommendations, suggested at multiple levels, can enable structural patient-centred care improvement and may unite stakeholders towards integrated birth care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L Depla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584, EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje M Crombag
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584, EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Immink MM, Koole S, Bekker MN, Groenendaal F, Kemmeren JM, de Melker HE, van der Maas NAT. Background incidence rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Netherlands: Data of 2006-2018. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:274-280. [PMID: 33259996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maternal vaccination is an effective and safe intervention to protect newborns against infectious diseases shortly after birth. We assessed background rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes before the implementation of a maternal pertussis immunisation programme in the Netherlands, to put into perspective the safety concerns about such outcomes following immunisation. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cross-sectional study, annual numbers of pregnancy outcomes derived from the Dutch Perinatal Registry were used to calculate incidence rates per 10,000 in the 2006-2018 period. Births of ≥500 g birth weight and ≥24 + 0 w gestational age were included. Trends with moving-average-lines over the past 3 years were plotted, with 95 % confidence interval. RESULTS From 2006 through 2018, yearly numbers of pregnancies ranged between 158,868-175,710. Numbers of newborns ranged between 161,307-178,874, of whom 160,838-178,177 were live-born. Most outcomes were stable over time. Between 2006-2011, occurrence of labour induction increased by 68 %, and postpartum hemorrhage increased by 25 %. Both stabilised from 2011 onwards. Perinatal mortality up to day 7 or 28 postpartum decreased by 38 % and 37 %, respectively. Occurrence of low Apgar score among preterm infants born before 37 + 0 w gestational age and among term infants increased by 19 % and 27 %, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study on background incidences showed notable increases over time in occurrence of labour induction, postpartum hemorrhage and low Apgar score, while showing a considerable decrease in overall perinatal mortality. These findings should be considered when interpreting data on adverse events occurring since the maternal pertussis immunisation programme was implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Sanne Koole
- The Dutch Perinatal Registry, Perined, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanet M Kemmeren
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
van den Heuvel JFM, Ayubi S, Franx A, Bekker MN. Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e18966. [PMID: 33112250 PMCID: PMC7657725 DOI: 10.2196/18966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Daily monitoring of fetal and maternal conditions in complicated pregnancies leads to recurrent outpatient visits or (prolonged) hospitalization. Alternatives for hospital admissions include home-based monitoring with home visits by professionals or telemonitoring with self-measurements performed by pregnant women and uploaded for in-clinic assessment. For both alternatives, cardiotocography and blood pressure measurement can be performed at home. It is unknown to what extent, for which reasons, and for which pregnancy complications these strategies are used. Objective This study aims to assess the current practice and attitudes concerning home-based monitoring (with daily home visits by professionals) and telemonitoring (using devices and the internet for daily self-recorded measurements) in high-risk pregnancies requiring maternal and fetal monitoring in the Netherlands. Methods This nationwide cross-sectional study involved sending a web-based survey to the obstetrics departments of all 73 hospitals in the Netherlands to be answered by 1 representative dedicated to pregnancy monitoring per hospital. The primary outcome was the provision of home-based monitoring or telemonitoring using cardiotocography between 1995 and 2018. The survey further addressed perspectives regarding the use of home-based monitoring and telemonitoring, including (contra)indications, advantages, and disadvantages for pregnant women and clinicians. Results The response rate for the provision of either home-based monitoring or telemonitoring was 100%. In 2018, 38% (28/73) of centers in the Netherlands offered either home-based monitoring or telemonitoring or both to pregnant women with complications. Home-based monitoring was offered in 26% (19/73) of the centers; telemonitoring, in 23% (17/73); and both in 11% (8/73). Telemonitoring was first offered in 2009, increasing from 4% (3/73) of hospitals in 2014 to 23% (17/73) in 2018. Responses were received from 78% (57/73) of the invited hospitals and analyzed. Of all 17 centers using telemonitoring, 59% (10/17) did not investigate perinatal outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction prior to implementation. Other (6/17, 35%) telemonitoring centers are participating in an ongoing multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing patient safety, satisfaction, and costs of telemonitoring with standard hospital admission. Home-based monitoring and telemonitoring are provided for a wide range of complications, such as fetal growth restriction, pre-eclampsia, and preterm rupture of membranes. The respondents reported advantages of monitoring from home, such as reduced stress and increased rest for patients, and reduction of admission and possible reduction of costs. The stated barriers included lack of insurance reimbursement and possible technical issues. Conclusions Home-based monitoring is provided in 26% (19/73) and telemonitoring, in 23% (17/73) of hospitals in the Netherlands to women with pregnancy complications. Altogether, 38% (28/73) of hospitals offer either home-based monitoring or telemonitoring or both as an alternative to hospital admission. Future research is warranted to assess safety and reimbursement issues before more widespread implementation of this practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samira Ayubi
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van Hoorn F, Koster M, Naaktgeboren CA, Groenendaal F, Kwee A, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Franx A, Bekker MN. Prognostic models versus single risk factor approach in first-trimester selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective population-based multicentre cohort study. BJOG 2020; 128:645-654. [PMID: 32757408 PMCID: PMC7891327 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate whether (1) first‐trimester prognostic models for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) outperform the currently used single risk factor approach, and (2) a first‐trimester random venous glucose measurement improves model performance. Design Prospective population‐based multicentre cohort. Setting Thirty‐one independent midwifery practices and six hospitals in the Netherlands. Population Women recruited before 14 weeks of gestation without pre‐existing diabetes. Methods The single risk factor approach (presence of at least one risk factor: BMI ≥30 kg/m2, previous macrosomia, history of GDM, positive first‐degree family history of diabetes, non‐western ethnicity) was compared with the four best performing models in our previously published external validation study (Gabbay‐Benziv 2014, Nanda 2011, Teede 2011, van Leeuwen 2010) with and without the addition of glucose. Main outcome measures Discrimination was assessed by c‐statistics, calibration by calibration plots, added value of glucose by the likelihood ratio chi‐square test, net benefit by decision curve analysis and reclassification by reclassification plots. Results Of the 3723 women included, a total of 181 (4.9%) developed GDM. The c‐statistics of the prognostic models were higher, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 without glucose and from 0.78 to 0.80 with glucose, compared with the single risk factor approach (0.72). Models showed adequate calibration, and yielded a higher net benefit than the single risk factor approach for most threshold probabilities. Teede 2011 performed best in the reclassification analysis. Conclusions First‐trimester prognostic models seem to outperform the currently used single risk factor approach in screening for GDM, particularly when glucose was added as a predictor. Tweetable abstract Prognostic models seem to outperform the currently used single risk factor approach in screening for gestational diabetes. Prognostic models seem to outperform the currently used single risk factor approach in screening for gestational diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F van Hoorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mph Koster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Naaktgeboren
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Kwee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Lamain-de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Depla AL, Ernst‐Smelt HE, Poels M, Crombag NM, Franx A, Bekker MN. A feasibility study of implementing a patient-centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth. Health Sci Rep 2020; 3:e168. [PMID: 32607452 PMCID: PMC7317300 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) developed a Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set, including PROM and PREM questionnaires. We studied the feasibility to use these PROMs/PREMs in Dutch perinatal care, addressing both women's and professionals' perspective. METHODS Patients and professionals in primary and hospital care participated. Women under care at one of five timepoints for PROM/PREM collection of the PCB set (2 during pregnancy, 3 postpartum) were e-mailed a questionnaire and discussed their answers with their obstetric professional the next regular visit. Compliance was recorded. After discussing the PROMs/PREMs, usability and experience were assessed with separate surveys amongst women and professionals. RESULTS Of 26 women approached, 21 completed and discussed their PROM/PREM questionnaire. Mean questionnaire completion rate was 97%. Average reported time completing the questionnaires was 10 minutes; most women (90%) stated this was acceptable. Women preferred completing questionnaires digitally and discuss their answers with an obstetric professional rather than other care professionals, also 6 months postpartum. Over half of women agreed PROMs/PREMs supported shared decision making (58%), ability to raise issues (60%), and patient-clinician relationship (52%). Six professionals participated: two obstetricians, two clinical midwives, and two community midwives. Most professionals experienced sufficient time to discuss the responses, except at 6 months postpartum. They knew what items to discuss but did not always feel responsible to act upon them. Professionals agreed PROMs/PREMs supported symptom detection and personalized care. CONCLUSIONS Patients and obstetric professionals consider the PCB set a feasible instrument for PROM/PREM assessment, with good compliance, acceptability and usability. Important determinants of successful implementation are a well-equipped ICT-tool, agreements regarding professionals' responsibilities and how outcomes are discussed or acted upon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L. Depla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Hiske E. Ernst‐Smelt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC – Sophia Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Poels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Neeltje M. Crombag
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU Leuven UniversityLeuvenBelgium
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC – Sophia Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|