Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing

How we handled our son's birth at the limits of viability after an unexpected pregnancy

In this paper, Dirk-Jan and Hiske, the parents of an infant born at 24 weeks of gestation, provide an insight into their experiences of their sons's birth and making decisions at the limit of viability. They were faced with the risk of an extremely premature birth at 22 weeks of gestation. The delivery miraculously stalled, and the limit of viability moved closer. The couple received prenatal counselling about the treatment options after birth, which were initiating intensive care treatment or comfort care. Together with physicians, they made the decision to initiate intensive care treatment if the infant was born in the grey zone. Different values were considered important in their lives during the decision-making process.

Multimedia tablet or paper handout to supplement counseling during preterm birth hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Parents of premature infants engage in shared decision-making regarding the care of their infant. The process of prenatal counseling typically involves a verbal conversation with a neonatal provider during hospitalization. Support people may not be available, and the pregnant person's memory is impaired by medications, pain, and stress. The American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development have called for improvements to this process, including the development of educational aids.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether a multimedia tablet would be more effective than a paper handout in supplementing verbal clinician counseling during preterm birth hospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial including English-speaking pregnant people aged ≥18 years and hospitalized at 22 to 33 weeks' gestation for preterm birth. Exclusion criteria were known fetal or chromosomal anomaly and delivery before study completion. Pregnant people received either a multimedia tablet or a paper handout before verbal clinician counseling. Preintervention assessment included demographics and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and postintervention assessment included the Parent Knowledge of Premature Birth Questionnaire and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Continuous variables were analyzed by t-test and categorical variables by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 122 pregnant people referred for counseling were screened; 76 were randomized, and 59 completed the study. Demographics were similar between groups, except that pregnant people in the handout group were older (mean 32 vs 29 years; P=.03). The multimedia tablet group (n=32) was less likely to report reviewing all the educational material than the paper handout group (n=27) (41% vs 72%; P=.037). Both groups correctly answered a similar number of knowledge items (P=.088). Postintervention state anxiety decreased in both groups (P<.0001), with no difference between groups. Computerized tracking showed that the multimedia group spent a median of 37 minutes reviewing the tablet.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to our hypothesis, a paper handout and multimedia tablet were equally effective in the labor unit for supplementing verbal preterm birth counseling, and both decreased parental anxiety.