Geurtzen R, van den Heuvel JFM, Huisman JJ, Lutke Holzik EM, Bekker MN, Hogeveen M. Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.
J Perinatol 2021;
41:2201-2207. [PMID:
34285357 DOI:
10.1038/s41372-021-01159-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To describe levels of perceived shared decision making (SDM), decisional conflict (DC), and decision regret (DR) in prenatal counseling by pregnant women, partners, neonatologists, and obstetricians regarding decision-making around imminent extreme premature birth in which a decision about palliative comfort care versus early intensive care had to be made.
STUDY DESIGN
Multicenter, cross-sectional study using surveys to determine perceived SDM at imminent extreme premature birth in parents and physicians, and to determine DC and DR in parents.
RESULTS
In total, 73 participants from 22 prenatal counseling sessions were included (21 pregnant women, 20 partners, 14 obstetricians, 18 neonatologists). High perceived levels of SDM were found (median 82,2), and low levels of DC (median 23,4) and DR at one month (median 12, 5).
CONCLUSIONS
Reported levels of self-perceived SDM in the setting of prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were high, by both the parents and the physicians. Levels of DC and DR were low.
Collapse