Fetal right aortic arch: associated anomalies, genetic anomalies with chromosomal microarray analysis, and postnatal outcome

Postnatal Outcomes in Prenatally Detected Vascular Rings

Vascular rings are rare congenital defects that can cause tracheal and/or esophageal compression. Prenatal detection is increasing due to advances in screening and fetal echocardiography. Postnatal outcomes remain variable. We describe our single-center experience of postnatal outcomes in prenatally detected vascular rings and evaluate factors associated with surgery. We performed a retrospective review of all fetal diagnoses of possible vascular ring evaluated between 2016 and 2023. Patients with significant intracardiac abnormalities, without postnatal data, or without confirmed postnatal diagnosis were excluded from postnatal analysis. Outcome variables included symptoms, tracheal/esophageal compression, and surgical repair. The prenatal cohort included 109 patients with 80% right aortic arch (RAA) and 20% double aortic arch (DAA). Of 72 patients in the postnatal cohort, 85% underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) at median age of 2 months with 0.84 ± 0.34 mSv of radiation. On CTA, 69% had a diverticulum. Of those with RAA, 95% had an aberrant left subclavian. Most (79%) had airway abnormalities on CTA. Fifteen (21%) developed symptoms at median age of 5 months. Fifty-eight percent  of patients underwent surgery at median age of 10 months, of which 33% were due to symptoms. On univariate analysis, DAA was associated with airway abnormalities on CTA and surgical repair. At 30-month follow up, 99% of patients remained asymptomatic. Prenatal diagnosis of vascular rings is associated with high rates of airway abnormalities, even in those without symptoms. Surgical repair was pursued in asymptomatic patients with DAA and airway abnormalities in our institution. As DAA is associated with airway abnormalities, these patients may require closer monitoring for future symptom development.

Prenatal diagnosis in fetal right aortic arch using chromosomal microarray analysis and whole exome sequencing: a Chinese single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Right aortic arch (RAA) is a common congenital aortic arch abnormality. Fetuses with RAA frequently have good outcomes after birth. However, chromosomal abnormalities and genetic syndromes suggest poor prognosis for these patients. So far the underlying genetic etiology is still not identified in most RAA patients based on traditional genetic techniques and a problem is still debated whether fetuses with isolated RAA should be referred for CMA. Our study aims to investigate the genetic etiology of fetuses with right aortic arch (RAA) by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) and evaluate the efficacy of CMA in fetal isolated RAA.

RESULTS

Among these 153 fetuses, 99 (64.7%) with isolated RAA and 54 (35.3%) with non-isolated RAA; 25.5% (39/153) with additional intracardiac anomalies (ICA), and 19.0% (29/153) with extracardiac anomalies (ECA). Tetralogy of Fallot (n = 10) and persistent left superior vena cava (n = 11) are the most common ICA and ECA, respectively. CMA detected 15 clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs) in 14 cases (9.2%); microdeletion of 22q11.21 was the most common pathogenic CNVs (7.8%). The chromosomal abnormalities rate was higher in non-isolated RAA and RAA with ICA groups than in isolated RAA group (16.7% vs. 5.1%; 20% vs. 5.1%, both p < 0.05). From five cases further undergoing WES, a diagnostic variant in MTOR gene (c.7255G > A, de novo) was first reported in prenatal, extending the prenatal manifestation of Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (OMIM: 616638); a clinically relevant variant c.3407A > T in STAG2 was identified, being inherited from the healthy mother. Moreover, the premature birth and termination rates were higher in non-isolated RAA group than in isolated RAA group (11.1% vs. 1.0%; 37.0% vs. 2.0%, both p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that CMA and WES are useful diagnostic tools for fetal RAA, particularly non-isolated RAA, and all fetuses with RAA should be referred for CMA. The data probably aids in prenatal diagnosis and prenatal counseling of fetal RAA.

Increased Pulmonary-Aortic Interspace in Fetal Right Aortic Arch: A Matched Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

The prenatal detection rate of a right aortic arch (RAA) has increased with the implementation of the three-vessel view (3VV) to the second-trimester anomaly scan formed by the pulmonary artery (PA), aorta (Ao), and superior vena cava (SVC). We examined the value of measuring the distance between PA and Ao in the 3VV in cases with an RAA.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study in which fetuses with an isolated RAA were matched to 3 healthy controls. Using 3VV images, the distances between PA, Ao, and SVC were measured and the ratio between PA to Ao (PAAo) distance and Ao to SVC (AoSVC) distance was calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-four RAA cases and 162 matched controls were included. The mean absolute distance PAAo was 3.1 mm in cases and 1.8 mm in controls (p < 0.001), and the mean PAAo/AoSVC ratio was 2.9 and 1.4, respectively (p < 0.001). The ROC curve of PAAo/AoSVC ratio showed a cut-off point of 1.9 with sensitivity and specificity over 87% for the diagnosis of RAA.

CONCLUSIONS

The pulmonary-aortic interspace and the PAAo/AoSVC ratio were significantly larger for RAA cases as compared to controls. If an increased pulmonary-aortic interspace is observed, a PAAo/AoSVC of ≥1.9 can be helpful in the diagnosis of an RAA.

Association Between Airway Stenosis Degree and Respiratory Distress in Infants With a Vascular Ring

Background Although the number of cases of prenatally diagnosed vascular rings is increasing, some cases may remain asymptomatic, and no indicator of the appearance of dyspnea has been established. Thus, we aimed to determine the relationship between the degree of airway compression by the vascular ring on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and respiratory distress. Methods This is a retrospective study of nine patients diagnosed with vascular rings at a single hospital from July 2010 to December 2019. Data regarding the patient's clinical characteristics, such as prenatal diagnosis, vascular ring type, complicated cardiac disease, and presence or absence of surgery, were recorded. Airway assessment on contrast-enhanced CT was measured in the axial cross-section. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (version 25.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Results Five of the eight patients had respiratory distress. Patients with respiratory distress were less likely to have been diagnosed prenatally (p = 0.04) and had smaller stenosis degree of anteroposterior diameter (p = 0.03). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced CT is useful in patients with vascular rings. Our study suggests that the stenosis degree of the anterior-posterior diameter of the airway is related to dyspnea.

[Prenatally detected aortic arch anomalies and their consequences after birth]

INTRODUCTION

Aortic arch anomalies are frequently associated with cardiac or extracardiac malformations, chromosomal aberrations and postpartum esophagus/trachea compression.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to establish the prevalence of associated cardiac and extracardiac malformations, the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with the diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies and to assess the pregnancy and the postnatal outcome.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study of all fetuses with aortic arch anomalies and genetic diagnosis in a tertiary referral obstetric and fetal cardiology centre between 2016 and 2020. Postpartum data were collected within 24 months after birth.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 11.380 pregnant women, the prevalence of aortic arch anomalies was 0.25%. Among 28 cases of right aortic arch anomalies, in 27 fetuses prenatal genetic diagnosis was available. We diagnosed 4 fetuses with mirror-image branching (right sided V-sign) and 23 fetuses with U-sign (4 fetuses with complete double aortic arch). 18 cases (66%) were isolated. Associated anomalies were cardiac in 3 cases and extracardiac in 7 cases (33%). The most frequent cardiac anomaly was tetralogy of Fallot (2/27), the extracardiac anomalies were thymus hypoplasia, single umbilical artery and subclavian artery malformations. In 1 case (3.7%), fluorescent in situ hybridization diagnosed 22q11.2 microdeletion. 75% of fetuses with right sided V-sign were associated with conotruncal malformations. Pregnancy and postpartum outcome were known in 24 pregnancies. Postnatal diagnosis was different from prenatal in 2 cases, the concordance rate was 93%. Isolated cases resulted in live birth in 17/18 pregnancies (93%). The frequency of postpartum trachea/esophagus compression was 42,9% (9 cases) due to vascular ring, in 6 children (28,6%) operation was necessary.

CONCLUSION

Fetal aortic arch anomalies are multidisciplinary diseases to be diagnosed by proper prenatal ultrasound examination. Associated fetal anomalies necessitate extended obstetric and cardiac sonography, invasive prenatal testing should be offered, and thorough postnatal long-term follow-up is recommended. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(28): 1111-1120.

Congenital Heart Defects and 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A 20-Year Update and New Insights to Aid Clinical Diagnosis

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are one of the most prevalent clinical features described in individuals diagnosed with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). Therefore, cardiac malformations may be the main finding to refer for syndrome investigation, especially in individuals with a mild phenotype. Nowadays, different cytogenetic methodologies have emerged and are used routinely in research laboratories. Hence, choosing an efficient technology and providing an accurate interpretation of clinical findings is crucial for 22q11.2DS patient's diagnosis. This systematic review provides an update of the last 20 years of research on 22q11.2DS patients with CHD and the investigation process behind each diagnosis. A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and LILACS using all entry terms to DiGeorge syndrome, CHDs, and cytogenetic analysis. After screening, 60 papers were eligible for review. We present a new insight of ventricular septal defect as a possible pivotal cardiac finding in individuals with 22q11.2DS. Also, we describe molecular technologies and cardiac evaluation as valuable tools in order to guide researchers in future investigations.

Prenatal Diagnosis of the Right Aortic Arch: Change in Detection Rate, the Status of Associated Anomalies, and Perinatal Outcomes in 137 Fetuses

To evaluate prenatal findings of the right aortic arch (RAA), associated cardiac, extracardiac, and genetic anomalies, its perinatal outcomes and the need for postnatal interventions in cases of isolated RAA with a view to facilitating appropriate counseling. This was a multicenter, cohort study, that was undertaken in two international major cardiac centers between 2009 and 2020. The study subjects were prenatally diagnosed RAA cases with and without other structural cardiac defects. A RAA was identified in 137 fetuses. There were 84 cases of isolated RAA. Associations with additional intracardiac malformations were found in 53 (38.7%) cases. An extracardiac anomaly was observed in 26/137 (18.9%) fetuses, 11/84 (13.0%) fetuses with isolated RAA, and 15/53 (28.3%) fetuses with an additional intracardiac anomaly. The incidence of extracardiac and chromosomal anomalies was significantly higher in cases of RAA with abnormal intracardiac anatomy (28.3-18.8%, respectively), compared with RAA with normal intracardiac anatomy (13.0-5.9%, respectively) (p < 0.05). 22q11.2 microdeletion was found higher in RAA with CHD (4/18 fetuses) than isolated RAA (2/24 fetuses) (22.2% vs. 8.3% respectively). ALSA was present in 19.3% of cases. ALSA was more frequently observed in cases of isolated RAA (23.6%), than in RAA with structural CHD (7.6%) (p < 0.05). The pregnancy was interrupted in six fetuses, and one died in utero. The mortality rate was higher in fetuses with intracardiac anomaly than RAA without cardiac anomaly (11/49 (22.4%) vs. 2/81 (2.4%). Vascular ring formation was revealed in 21/98 cases. The RAA caused symptoms of a vascular ring in only one patient (0.7%) requiring surgery in the follow-up. Overall survival after initial diagnosis in the total cohort was 85.4% with 38 of 53 (71%) RAA with CHD cases and 79 of 84 (94.0%) isolated RAA cases. Chromosomal and extracardiac anomalies are lower in isolated RAA but not negligible hence amniocentesis should be routinely offered in all cases. The requirement for postnatal intervention in the immediate neonatal period is remote, therefore delivery of these fetuses need not be undertaken at a cardiac or surgical center.

Aortic Arch Laterality in Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Male-Female Difference

We reviewed patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We analyzed cardiovascular findings in patients with confirmed chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome live-born in Nevada between March 2007 and September 2020. We identified 60 patients. Of the 60 patients, 32 (53%) were female. Of the 60, 48 (80%) had a conotruncal abnormality (including isolated vascular rings): 23 of 32 (72%) for females versus 25 of 28 (89%) for males, P = .41. However, 11 (34%) of 32 females had a right aortic arch; whereas, 21 (75%) of 28 males had a right aortic arch, P = .007. In conclusion, in our patient cohort, we found conotruncal malformations were common. However, we noted males were statistically more likely to have a right aortic arch than females. To the best of our knowledge, this male-female aortic arch laterality difference in patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome has not been previously noted.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses Detected with Isolated Cardiovascular Malformation: A Multicenter Study, Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Cardiovascular malformations (CVM) represent the most common structural anomalies, occurring in 0.7% of live births. The CVM prenatal suspicion should prompt an accurate investigation with fetal echocardiography and the assessment through genetic counseling and testing. In particular, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) allows the identification of copy number variations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, studying the incremental diagnostic yield of CMA in fetal isolated CVM, scoring yields for each category of heart disease, with the aim of guiding genetic counseling and prenatal management. At the same time, we report 59 fetuses with isolated CVM with normal karyotype who underwent CMA. The incremental CMA diagnostic yield in fetuses with isolated CVM was 5.79% (CI 5.54–6.04), with conotruncal malformations showing the higher detection rate (15.93%). The yields for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery were the lowest (2.64% and 0.66%). Other CVM ranged from 4.42% to 6.67%. In the retrospective cohort, the diagnostic yield was consistent with literature data, with an overall CMA diagnostic yield of 3.38%. CMA in the prenatal setting was confirmed as a valuable tool for investigating the causes of fetal cardiovascular malformations.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcomes of right aortic arch anomalies

PURPOSE

To give a report on the experience of our tertiary perinatology clinic on the pre- and postnatal management of the right aortic arch (RAA) by evaluating the patients as isolated and non-isolated RAA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred to our perinatology clinic for fetal echocardiography were evaluated retrospectively. They were assessed in two groups: isolated RAA and non-isolated RAA. The isolated RAA group consisted of patients without any additional cardiac or extracardiac anomalies. According to our routine practice, all patients received detailed prenatal ultrasonography following fetal echocardiography and genetic counseling.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were evaluated. 38 patients (63.3%) presented with additional cardiac anomalies. 21.7% had extracardiac anomalies, including 16.7% who also had cardiac anomalies. In 2 patients (3.7%) 22q11.2 microdeletion, in 2 patients (3.7%) trisomy 21, in 1 patient (1.9%) trisomy 13 and in 1 patient (1.9%) 20p12.1p11.23 (a deletion of 2880 kbp) were reported. The most common cardiac anomaly associated with RAA was Tetralogy of Fallot (25%). Fetal growth restriction was reported in 8.3% of the cases. 18 patients had isolated RAA. 16 out of the 18 patients had normal genetic analysis. 2 of them (11.11%) presented with a 22q11.2 microdeletion.

CONCLUSION

A single-center experience on the diagnosis and management of RAA has been reported in this study. The results indicate that a prenatal cardiac evaluation in 3VV is of utmost importance in all pregnancies to detect RAA and refer these patients to the appropriate perinatology clinics for further evaluation and care.

Comprehensive evaluation of genetic variants using chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing in fetuses with congenital heart defect

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate comprehensively, using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES), the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and sequence variants in unselected fetuses with congenital heart defect (CHD) and to evaluate the potential diagnostic yields of CMA and ES for different CHD subgroups.

METHODS

This was a study of 360 unselected singleton fetuses with CHD detected by echocardiography, referred to our department for genetic testing between February 2018 and December 2019. We performed CMA, as a routine test for aneuploidy and copy number variations (CNV), and then, in cases without aneuploidy or pathogenic CNV on CMA, we performed ES.

RESULTS

Overall, positive genetic diagnoses were made in 84 (23.3%) fetuses: chromosomal abnormalities were detected by CMA in 60 (16.7%) and sequence variants were detected by ES in a further 24 (6.7%) cases. The detection rate of pathogenic and likely pathogenic genetic variants in fetuses with non-isolated CHD (32/83, 38.6%) was significantly higher than that in fetuses with isolated CHD (52/277, 18.8%) (P < 0.001), this difference being due mainly to the difference in frequency of aneuploidy between the two groups. The prevalence of a genetic defect was highest in fetuses with an atrioventricular septal defect (36.8%), ventricular septal defect with or without atrial septal defect (28.4%), conotruncal defect (22.2%) or right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (20.0%). We also identified two novel missense mutations (c.2447G>C, p.Arg816Pro; c.1171C>T, p.Arg391Cys) and a new phenotype caused by variants in PLD1.

CONCLUSIONS

Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 16.7% and sequence variants in a further 6.7% of fetuses with CHD. ES should be offered to all pregnant women with a CHD fetus without chromosomal abnormality or pathogenic CNV identified by CMA, regardless of whether the CHD is isolated. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for the Fetuses with Aortic Arch Abnormalities and Normal Karyotype

Background

Aortic arch abnormalities (AAA) are abnormal embryologic developments of the aorta and its branches. Their outcomes often depend on their association with other congenital diseases and genetic testing results.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with different patterns of AAA and normal karyotype.

Methods

Data from 158 pregnancies referred for prenatal CMA testing due to fetal AAA were obtained between April 2016 and April 2019. Fetuses with isolated AAA, AAA accompanied by soft ultrasound markers, and AAA with other ultrasound malformations were classified into groups A, B, and C, respectively. Cases with detectable karyotype aberrations were excluded from the study.

Results

Twenty cases (12.7%) of submicroscopic anomalies were detected in 158 cases with normal karyotype, comprising 16 cases (10.1%) of clinically significant variants, two cases (1.3%) of variants of unknown significance, and two variants (1.3%) that were likely benign. Microdeletion of 22q11.2 accounted for 25% (4/16) of the clinically significant variants. The overall incremental yields by CMA in group A, group B, and group C were 1.8%, 2.3%, and 24.1%, respectively. Except for double aortic arch, the incremental yield of clinical significant findings for each type of AAA in group C was much higher than that in group A and group B. In group A, a clinically significant variant was only detected in one fetus with right aortic arch (RAA) (1.8%, 1/57).

Conclusions

In addition to 22q11.2 microdeletion, many other clinically significant submicroscopic variants are present in fetuses with AAA, especially in fetuses with other ultrasound malformations. Although CMA is always recommended in the presence of any malformation in many countries, our results suggest insufficient evidence to recommend CMA in fetuses with isolated AAA, except for isolated RAA.

The Differential Diagnosis of Double Aortic Arch and Right Aortic Arch with Mirror-Image Branches in the Fetus: A Potential Novel Method

The objective of this study was to explore a new method for the differential diagnosis between fetal double aortic arch (DAA) and right aortic arch with mirror-image branches (RAA-MB). Clinical data and prenatal echocardiographic features of the DAA (n = 22) and RAA-MB (n = 65) confirmed by postnatal or autopsy findings were analyzed retrospectively. The angles between the two aortic arches in the DAA group and between the right aortic arch and the mirror branch were measured. The differences between the two groups and differential diagnosis value of the angles were compared and analyzed based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. The proportion of left-sided ductal arteriosus (100%) was higher in the DAA group than that (32.3%) in the RAA-MB group, (P < 0.05). The proportion of conotruncal anomalies is higher in the RAA-MB group (64.6%) than in the DAA group (18.2%) (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the angles between the groups (DAA: 50.3° ± 8.3° vs. RAA-MB: 82.9° ± 13.8°) (P < 0.01). When the cutoff value was 62.8°, the sensitivity and specificity of the differential diagnosis were 95.5% and 96.9%, respectively. Distinguishing the angle measurement between DAA and RAA-MB is helpful in prenatal prognosis. We recommend a cutoff value of 62.8°.

Right aortic arch forming a true vascular ring: a clinical review

OBJECTIVES

This review aims at presenting and summarizing the current state of literature on the presentation and surgical management of a right-sided aortic arch with a left-sided ligamentum forming a complete vascular ring around the oesophagus and trachea.

METHODS

A systematic database search for appropriate literature was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE. Articles were considered relevant when providing details on the presentation, diagnosis and surgical treatment of this specific congenital arch anomaly in human beings.

RESULTS

Affected patients present with respiratory and/or oesophageal difficulties due to tracheoesophageal compression. Conservative treatment might be reasonable in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases; however, once moderate-to-severe symptoms develop, surgical intervention is definitely indicated. Surgery is commonly performed through a left thoracotomy or median sternotomy and includes the division of the left ductal ligamentum; if a Kommerell's diverticulum is present that is >1.5 times the diameter of the subclavian artery, then concomitant resection of the large diverticulum and translocation of the aberrant left subclavian artery is also conducted. Postoperative morbidity and mortality are low and are rather related to concomitant intracardiac and extracardiac anomalies than to the procedure itself. In a majority of patients, full resolution of symptoms is seen within months to years from the surgery. Nevertheless, there is also a subset of patients who remain with some tracheobronchial narrowing, sometimes even requiring reintervention during follow-up due to persisting or recurring symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the surgical management of a right aortic arch forming a true vascular ring in infancy, childhood and adulthood seems relatively safe and effective in providing symptomatic relief despite some persistent tracheobronchial and/or oesophageal narrowing in some cases.

Morphology of vascular ring arch anomalies influences prognosis and management

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the anatomical features of aortic arch anomalies associated with vascular rings, hoping to identify those which may increase the risk of symptomatic presentation and surgical intervention.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study at a single cardiac unit. Individuals diagnosed with an aortic arch anomaly, either isolated or non-isolated, between June 2014 and September 2018 were included. The morphology of the aortic arch was established via analysis of postnatal echocardiography, CT or MRI scans. CT and magnetic resonance studies were evaluated for the presence of a Kommerell diverticulum in those with aberrant vessels. Case notes were reviewed for relevant clinical data.

RESULTS

Of those with aberrant subclavian arteries, 24/79 (30.4%) were shown to have a Kommerell diverticulum. Additional forms of congenital heart disease were present in 133/227 (58.6%) individuals. Surgical division of the vascular ring was performed in 30/227 (13.2%), most commonly in the setting of a double aortic arch (70.8%). In those with aberrant subclavian arteries, no children without a Kommerell diverticulum were referred for surgery. In those with a Kommerell diverticulum confirmed on imaging, 11/24 underwent surgery.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with a double aortic arch, or an aberrant subclavian artery arising from a Kommerell diverticulum, have the highest requirement for surgical intervention, especially in isolated anomalies. These individuals should remain under monitoring. The subjective nature of symptoms remains problematic. Longitudinal research is required further to understand the natural history of vascular rings and how it links to morphology.

Fetal Vascular Rings and Pulmonary Slings: Strategies for Two- and Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Diagnosis

Fetal aortic arch anomalies and pulmonary slings can be difficult to accurately diagnose but have important clinical implications related to vascular rings, congenital heart disease, and chromosomal anomalies. In this article, the authors briefly review the embryology and development of the fetal arch to facilitate understanding of its diverse variants. Two-dimensional echocardiographic characteristics are summarized for each type of these malformations to propose a strategy for fetal diagnosis. The added benefits of three-dimensional echocardiography with spatiotemporal image correlation are also shown. Finally, the authors propose a strategy for volume acquisition and postanalysis to spur postanalysis clinical use of this technology.

Postnatal Outcome and Associated Anomalies of Prenatally Diagnosed Right Aortic Arch with Concomitant Right Ductal Arch: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Right aortic arch presents a reported incidence of 0.1% of the general population; the aim of our study was to evaluate the risk of associated intracardiac (ICA), extracardiac (ECA), or chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with right aortic arch (RAA) and concomitant right ductal arch (RDA). A systematic review of the literature selected 18 studies including 60 cases of RAA/RDA. A meta-analysis with a random effect model calculated for each outcome the pooled crude proportion of associated abnormal outcomes in cases of RAA/RDA and the pooled proportions and odds ratios in RAA with LDA or RDA. Quality assessment of the included studies was achieved using the NIH quality assessment tool for case series studies. RAA/RDA presents risk of associated conotruncal CHDs of about 30% and risk of 22q11 microdeletion in the region of 1%. Two-thirds of 22q11 microdeletions had concomitant thymic hypoplasia and no other chromosomal defects were described. Risks for ICA, ECA, 22q11 microdeletion, and aberrant left subclavian artery are not substantially different in RAA with right or left arterial duct. RAA increases the risk of associated cardiac defects regardless of laterality of the ductal arch. In isolated RDA/RAA cases, absolute risks of extracardiac associated problems or surgery are rather low, we would therefore recommend reassurance, particularly when the thymus and karyotype are normal.

22q11.2 deletion syndrome and congenital heart disease

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 4-6,000 livebirths. The phenotype varies widely; the most common features include: facial dysmorphia, hypocalcemia, palate and speech disorders, feeding and gastrointestinal disorders, immunodeficiency, recurrent infections, neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders, and congenital heart disease. Approximately 60-80% of patients have a cardiac malformation most commonly including a subset of conotruncal defects (tetralogy of Fallot, truncus arteriosus, interrupted aortic arch type B), conoventricular and/or atrial septal defects, and aortic arch anomalies. Cardiac patients with a 22q11.2 deletion do not generally experience higher mortality upon surgical intervention but suffer more peri-operative complications than their non-syndromic counterparts. New guidelines suggest screening for a 22q11.2 deletion in the patient with tetralogy of Fallot, truncus arteriosus, interrupted aortic arch type B, conoventricular septal defects as well as those with an isolated aortic arch anomaly. Early identification of a 22q11.2 deletion in the neonate or infant when other syndromic features may not be apparent allows for timely parental screening for reproductive counseling and anticipatory evaluation of cardiac and noncardiac features. Screening the at-risk child or adult allows for important age-specific clinical, neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and reproductive issues to be addressed.

Incidence of chromosomal anomalies in fetuses with isolated right aortic arch: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Right aortic arch (RAA) can be associated with chromosomal anomalies. However, the incidence of chromosomal anomalies when RAA is isolated (iRAA), ie, not associated with intracardiac anomalies, varies between different studies (0%-28.5%). We have performed a meta-analysis to allow a more accurate prenatal counselling.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for articles related to chromosomal anomalies among iRAA fetuses until April 2019. A total of 22 relevant studies, including 670 fetuses, were selected in the final meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The results revealed that the overall rates of chromosomal anomalies and 22q11.2 deletion in iRAA fetuses were 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7%-10.8%) and 4.3% (95% CI, 2.6%-6.4%), respectively, while the rates were lower in iRAA without extracardiac anomalies, 4.7% (95% CI, 1.1%-10.8%) and 2.4% (95% CI, 0.5%-5.7%). The rate of chromosomal or copy number variants including 22q11.2 deletion identified by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in iRAA fetuses was 8.2% (95% CI, 5.0%-12.1%) and 3.7% (95% CI, 1.7%-6.6%), respectively, compared with 5.1% (95% CI, 2.5%-8.4%) and 2.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-5.1%) identified by traditional karyotyping.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of iRAA cases have associated chromosomal anomalies and prevalence of associated 22q11.2 deletion, and CMA is recommended if invasive prenatal testing is performed.

[Isolated right aortic arch: prenatal diagnosis characteristics, pregnancy outcomes and systematic review]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate prenatal diagnosis characteristics and pregnancy outcomes associated with isolated right aortic arch (RAA).

METHODS

A retrospective study including fetuses with isolated RAA, managed between January 2010 and February 2018. Cases were identified from the ultrasound databases of the expert pediatric cardiologists, who made the aforementioned diagnosis. All fetuses were examined by a fetal medicine imaging expert to exclude any extracardiac abnormality. A systematic review was performed to assess the prenatal diagnosis and outcomes of fetuses with isolated RAA.

RESULTS

Fifty-six fetuses were diagnosed with an isolated RAA. An isolated double aortic arch (DAA) was diagnosed in one fetus. Mean gestational age at diagnosis was 24 weeks. The sex ratio (boy/girl) was 0.89. No significant abnormality was detected in invasive tests (karyotype and FISH or microarray). Only one fetus was misdiagnosed with isolated RAA. He was the only symptomatic (stridor) newborn baby and was later diagnosed with DAA. Four studies were included in our systematic review representing 115 cases of isolated RAA. One significant chromosomal abnormality was detected: a 22q11 deletion in a newborn baby who had a postnatal finding of a soft palate cleft. There was one major obstetric complication: an intrauterine fetal demise at 41 gestational weeks.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of isolated RAA can be challenging. Invasive tests are to be discussed. The diagnosis of isolated RAA should not change obstetric monitoring. Nevertheless, an echocardiography should be performed systematically in these new newborn babies within their first month of life.

Prenatal echocardiographic assessment of right aortic arch

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience with fetal diagnosis of right aortic arch (RAA) variants based on the ductus arteriosus (DA) anatomy and brachiocephalic vessel branching pattern in relation to the trachea, and to establish whether the echocardiographic 'V-shaped' or 'U-shaped' appearance of the junction between the DA and aortic arch (AA) in the fetal upper mediastinal view is sufficiently accurate for assessment of fetal AA anatomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal RAA that had postnatal confirmation of AA anatomy, referred to our tertiary center during 2011-2017. Prenatal and postnatal medical records, including echocardiographic and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan reports, were reviewed, and cardiac and extracardiac abnormalities and the results of genetic testing were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 55 consecutive pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal RAA, six were lost to follow-up, one was terminated and three were excluded due to lack of postnatal confirmation of AA anatomy. Of the remaining 45 pregnancies, AA anatomy was assessed postnatally by CT in 39, by MRI in one and by direct examination at cardiac surgery in five. A U-shaped appearance was found in 37/45 (82.2%) patients, all of which had a complete vascular ring (CVR). Of these 37 patients, on postnatal confirmation, 21 (56.8%) had RAA with Kommerell's diverticulum, left posterior ductus arteriosus (LPDA) and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) (RAA/LPDA/ALSA), 11 (29.7%) had a double AA (DAA), four (10.8%) had RAA with Kommerell's diverticulum, LPDA and mirror-image (MI) branching (RAA/LPDA/MI), and one (2.7%) had RAA with Kommerell's diverticulum, LPDA and aberrant left innominate artery (ALIA) (RAA/LPDA/ALIA). A V-shaped appearance was found in 3/45 (6.7%) patients, all of which had RAA with right DA not forming a CVR and MI branching. In the 5/45 (11.1%) fetuses with neither U- nor V-shaped appearance, RAA with left anterior DA arising from the left innominate artery and MI branching, not forming a CVR, was found. Twelve (26.7%) fetuses had a congenital heart defect (CHD). RAA forming a CVR (U-shaped appearance) was associated with a septal defect in 6/37 (16.2%) fetuses, while RAA not forming a CVR (V-shaped appearance or no U- or V-shaped appearance) was associated with major CHD in 6/8 (75.0%) fetuses.

CONCLUSIONS

In fetuses with RAA, V-shaped appearance of the junction between the DA and AA indicates only that the transverse AA and DA run together on the same side of the thorax (trachea) while a U-shaped appearance is always a sign of a CVR. Among fetuses with a CVR, RAA/LPDA/MI is more frequent than described previously. Finally, RAA forming a CVR is not usually associated with complex CHD, as opposed to RAA not forming a CVR. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fetal Right Aortic Arch: A Quantitative Method of Outcome Prediction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate right aortic arches (RAA) quantitatively and risk-stratify fetuses with RAA prenatally.

METHOD

A total of 143 singleton fetuses were enrolled. Four measurements were studied, including the angle and distance between the aortic arch (AO) and ductal arch (DA), the diameters of the AO and DA, and the distance growth rate (DGR).

RESULT

A significant increase in mean distance was observed in the study group (4.89 ± 1.07 mm) compared to the control group (1.62 ± 0.33 mm, p<.01). The distance increased from the second (1.52 ± 0.35 mm, p<.01, 4.06 ± 0.78 mm, p<.01) to third trimester (1.71 ± 0.29 mm, p<.01, 5.13 ± 1.10 mm, p<.01) in the normal and study groups. Fetuses with abnormalities in addition to RAAs had significantly lower growth rates (12.4 ± 5.2%) than those with an isolated RAA (33.7 ± 12.0%).

CONCLUSION

Parameters, especially DGR, may be clinically significant. DGR may be restricted when an RAA exists with other malformations. Decreasing DGR in fetuses with RAAs suggests the presence of other malformations.

Prenatal Detection, Comorbidities, and Management of Vascular Rings

The 3-vessel and trachea view is now integrated into obstetrical screening and facilitates prenatal detection of vascular rings. We examined trends in prenatal detection, associated cardiac and extracardiac anomalies, and surgical management in this population. We reviewed a population-based cohort of pediatric vascular ring patients diagnosed prenatally and postnatally between 2002 and 2017 in Alberta, Canada. Of 106 cases, 28 (26%) had a prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal detection increased over time: 0/29 from 2002 to 2009, 4/28 (14%) from 2009 to 2011, 7/23 (30%) from 2012 to 2014, and 17/26 (65%) from 2015 to 2017 (p <0.01). The prenatal group more commonly had right aortic arch/left ductus/aberrant left subclavian artery (24/28vs 53/78, p = 0.04) and associated cardiac pathology (18/28vs 33/78, p = 0.05). The rate of genetic anomalies was overall higher than previously reported (34%) and did not differ between groups (11/28vs 25/78, p = 0.48). Those with a prenatal diagnosis were less likely to require cross-sectional imaging (9/28vs 48/78, p <0.01), modifying the vascular ring subtype diagnosis in 2 patients. Surgical intervention was common and did not differ between groups (24/28vs 66/78, p = 0.89). In conclusion, prenatal detection of vascular rings has increased. Despite differences in vascular ring subtype and associated cardiac pathology, the incidence of genetic anomalies and need for surgical intervention is not associated with timing of diagnosis. Genetic counseling should be universally offered. The diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography suggests additional imaging may not be routinely required.

Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is performed either by array comparative genomic hybridization or by using a single nucleotide polymorphism array. In the prenatal setting, CMA is on par with traditional karyotyping for detection of major chromosomal imbalances such as aneuploidy and unbalanced rearrangements. CMA offers additional diagnostic benefits by revealing sub-microscopic imbalances or copy number variations that are too small to be seen on a standard G-banded chromosome preparation. These submicroscopic imbalances are also referred to as microdeletions and microduplications, particularly when they include specific genomic regions that are associated with clinical sequelae. Not all microdeletions/duplications are associated with adverse clinical phenotypes and in many cases, their presence is benign. In other cases, they are associated with a spectrum of clinical phenotypes that may range from benign to severe, while in some situations, the clinical significance may simply be unknown. These scenarios present a challenge for prenatal diagnosis, and genetic counseling prior to prenatal CMA greatly facilitates delivery of complex results. In prenatal diagnostic samples with a normal karyotype, chromosomal microarray will diagnose a clinically significant subchromosomal deletion or duplication in approximately 1% of structurally normal pregnancies and 6% with a structural anomaly. Pre-test counseling is also necessary to distinguish the primary differences between the benefits, limitations and diagnostic scope of CMA versus the powerful but limited screening nature of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis using cell-free fetal DNA.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with conotruncal heart defects by genome-wide high-resolution SNP array

Objectives: To explore chromosomal variations, including copy number variations (CNVs), in fetuses with conotruncal heart defect (CTD).Methods: During a 5-year period, a total of 129 fetuses with ascertained CTDs were investigated for chromosomal abnormalities using quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Fetuses were divided into two subgroups: benign group (with normal QF-PCR results and benign CNVs) and nonbenign group [with aneuploidies, nonbenign CNVs [pathogenic CNVs and CNVs of unknown significance (VOUS)]. Data on fetal structural malformations, chromosomal variations, and pregnancy outcomes were collected and compared.Results: Of the 129 cases, 17 were found to have common aneuploidies. In the remaining 112 cases with normal a QF-PCR result, pathogenic CNVs, CNVs of VOUS, and benign CNVs were identified in 5.3, 5.3, and 4.5%, respectively. Compared with benign group, fetuses in nonbenign group had a significantly higher rate of neurologic defects (13.8 versus 3.0%, p < .05), overall extracardiac anomalies (86.2 versus 45.0%, p < .05), and perinatal death (57.1 versus 18.4%, p < .05), whereas, no significant difference in that of associated cardiovascular anomalies was noted (48.2 versus 46.0%, p = .29). Among the extracardiac anomalies, thymus abnormalities were strongly associated with nonbenign CNVs (33.3 versus 1% of fetuses in benign group, p < .05).Conclusions: Pathogenic CNVs, in addition to chromosomal aneuploidies, contributed to the pathogenesis of CTD. The presence of associated extracardiac anomalies including thymus abnormalities correlated with a higher probability of nonbenign chromosomal variations, which was associated with an unfavorable outcome.

Prenatal microarray analysis in right aortic arch-a retrospective cohort study and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk for clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) findings in fetal right aortic arch (RAA).

METHODS

Data from all CMA analyses performed owing to isolated RAA reported to the Israeli Ministry of Health between January 2013 and September 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Risk for abnormal CMA findings was compared with two control populations, based on both previously described 9272 pregnancies with normal ultrasound, and on a local cohort of 5541 pregnancies undergoing CMA testing owing to maternal request. In addition, Pubmed database search was conducted for original researches examining this issue.

RESULTS

Of 94 CMA analyses performed owing to isolated RAA, six (6.4%) pathogenic findings were detected (47,XX + 21; 45,X; two 22q11.2 microdeletions; 10p15.3 microdeletion and 16p11.2 duplication). Compared with control groups, an isolated RAA yielded a significantly increased relative risk for abnormal CMA results. Literature search yielded two additional retrospective studies describing microarray testing in RAA and encompassing 57 cases. The overall risk for clinically significant CMA findings was 6.62% (10/151).

CONCLUSIONS

CMA testing is indicated in cases of prenatal isolated RAA, even in the era of advanced sonographic equipment, routine biochemical screening for Down syndrome and available non-invasive prenatal testing.

Characteristics of prenatally detected right aortic arch cases in a single institution

This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic process, the associated anomalies and the perinatal outcomes of right aortic arch (RAA) in a group of low-risk patients. The obstetric imaging database and digital patient files were reviewed between January 2015 and June 2016. There were 12 RAA cases detected prenatally. Seven foetuses had an aberrant left subclavian artery and one foetus had mirror image branching. The prevalence of RAA was 1.8 in 1000. Invasive prenatal diagnosis was offered to patients and seven tests were performed. There was one associated cardiac anomaly (8.3%) and one extra-cardiac anomaly (8.3%) in the same foetus which cordocentesis revealed trisomy 21. There were also two 22q11.2 microdeletion cases with isolated RAA with aberrant left subclavian arteries. All patients have given live births except one patient has chosen a termination of pregnancy for 22q11.2 microdeletion. The median follow-up time of the newborns was 21 months. None of the babies required surgery for RAA during follow-up. All the babies are alive, except for the one with trisomy 21, who dead at 5 months due to the surgical complications of an oesophageal atresia operation. Patients with an RAA foetus should be offered for foetal karyotyping and analysis for 22q11.2 microdeletion. When isolated, RAA has usually a good prognosis and rarely requires cardiac surgery. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Prenatal diagnosis of RAA should prompt a detailed cardiac and extra-cardiac ultrasound examination. When isolated, RAA is associated with 22q11 deletion and aneuploidies in 4.6% and 5.1%, of cases respectively. What the results of this study add? Our study showed that 28.5% of isolated RAA cases are associated with 22q11.2 microdeletion. Cardiac surgery is rarely required when RAA is an isolated anomaly. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Invasive prenatal testing for karyotypes and 22q11.2 microdeletion should be offered to patients with RAA, even in the case of an isolated one. Further larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with congenital heart disease: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Currently, chromosomal microarray analysis is considered the first-tier test in pediatric care and prenatal diagnosis. However, the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease has not been evaluated based on a large cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray as the first-tier test for chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with congenital heart disease.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective study, 602 prenatal cases of congenital heart disease were investigated using single nucleotide polymorphism array over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Overall, pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 125 (20.8%) of 602 prenatal cases of congenital heart disease, with 52.0% of them being numerical chromosomal abnormalities. The detection rates of likely pathogenic copy number variations and variants of uncertain significance were 1.3% and 6.0%, respectively. The detection rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities in congenital heart disease plus additional structural anomalies (48.9% vs 14.3%, P < .0001) or intrauterine growth retardation group (50.0% vs 14.3%, P = .044) was significantly higher than that in isolated congenital heart disease group. Additionally, the detection rate in congenital heart disease with additional structural anomalies group was significantly higher than that in congenital heart disease with soft markers group (48.9% vs 19.8%, P < .0001). No significant difference was observed in the detection rates between congenital heart disease with additional structural anomalies and congenital heart disease with intrauterine growth retardation groups (48.9% vs 50.0%), congenital heart disease with soft markers and congenital heart disease with intrauterine growth retardation groups (19.8% vs 50.0%), or congenital heart disease with soft markers and isolated congenital heart disease groups (19.8% vs 14.3%). The detection rate in fetuses with congenital heart disease plus mild ventriculomegaly was significantly higher than in those with other types of soft markers (50.0% vs 15.6%, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests chromosomal microarray analysis is a reliable and high-resolution technology and should be used as the first-tier test for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in clinical practice.