Prenatally detected copy number variants in a national cohort: A postnatal follow‐up study

Incidental Findings Identified by Prenatal Microarray Analysis and Consensus Reporting Criteria of the Catalan Public Health Network XIGENICS

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) classified as incidental findings (IFs) in prenatal diagnosis and to develop consensus recommendations for standardizing their reporting across six centers within the Catalan public health system (XIGENICS network).

METHOD

A retrospective review of 4219 consecutive prenatal microarrays performed within the network from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, including all referral reasons. To develop consensus recommendations, several discussion meetings were held along with an extensive review of the existing literature.

RESULTS

A total of 69 IFs were identified in 68 samples, revealing a detection rate of 1.6%. They included: 5 CNVs associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital defects with complete penetrance, 41 CNVs for neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital defects with incomplete penetrance, 4 disorders that can potentially be prevented or treated, 5 non-childhood onset neurological disorders, 13 X-linked disorders (mainly STS and DMD deletions), and 1 deletion of the SHOX gene. Long-term follow-up revealed that newborns with high penetrance neurosusceptibility CNVs exhibited clinical manifestations more frequently than those with low penetrance CNVs. At the time of reporting, 52 IFs were disclosed, while 17 were not. According to the new consensus criteria, 43 IFs would now be reported, 17 would not, and 9 would depend on parental decision. CNVs consistent with the referral reason were identified in 4% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the largest series rigorously documenting all identified IFs in consecutive pregnancies evaluated by microarray, including both reported and unreported findings. IFs were found at a higher frequency than previously recognized, underscoring the need for specific clinical attention. Comprehensive consensus reporting recommendations were developed to ensure uniformity of criteria, and an ad hoc committee was established to manage complex cases.

A systematic review and pooled analysis of penetrance estimates of copy-number variants associated with neurodevelopment

PURPOSE

Many copy-number variants (CNVs) are reported to cause a variety of neurodevelopmental disabilities including intellectual disability, developmental delay, autism, and other phenotypes with incomplete penetrance. Therefore, not all individuals with a pathogenic CNV are affected. Penetrance estimates vary between studies. A systematic review was conducted to clarify CNV penetrance for 83 recurrent CNVs.

METHODS

A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO #CRD42021253955) was conducted to identify penetrance estimates for CNVs associated with neurodevelopment. Pooled analysis was performed using forest plots. The Ottawa Risk of Bias Assessment facilitated evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were reviewed in detail with 9 affected cohorts pooled and compared with the gnomAD v4.0 CNV control cohort of 269,885 individuals. Several CNVs previously associated with nonstatistically significant penetrance estimates now exhibit statistically significant differences, contributing to emerging evidence for their pathogenicity (15q24 duplication [A-D breakpoints], 15q24.2q24.5 deletion and duplication [FBXO22], 17q11.2 duplication [NF1], 17q21.31 duplication [KANSL1] and 22q11.2 distal duplication). Additionally, evidence is presented for the benign nature of some CNVs (15q11.2 duplication [NIPA1] and 2q13 proximal duplication [NPHP1]).

CONCLUSION

This is a large-scale systematic review of CNVs associated with neurodevelopment. A synopsis analyzing penetrance and pathogenicity is provided for each of the 83 recurrent CNVs.

Perinatal outcomes after a prenatal diagnosis of a fetal copy number variant: a retrospective population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are no established guidelines for the follow up of infants born after a prenatal diagnosis of a genomic copy number variant (CNV), despite their increased risk of developmental issues. The aims of this study were (i) to determine the perinatal outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with and without a CNV, and (ii) to establish a population-based paediatric cohort for long term developmental follow up.

METHODS

An Australian state-wide research database was screened for pregnant individuals who had a prenatal chromosomal microarray (CMA) between 2013-2019 inclusive. Following linkage to laboratory records and clinical referrer details, hospital records were manually reviewed for study eligibility. Eligible participants were mother-child pairs where the pregnancy resulted in a livebirth, the mother was able to provide informed consent in English (did not require a translator) and the mother was the primary caregiver for the child at hospital discharge after birth. Research invitations were sent by registered post at an average of six years after the prenatal diagnostic test. Statistical analysis was performed in Stata17.

RESULTS

Of 1832 prenatal records examined, 1364 (74.5%) mother-child pairs were eligible for recruitment into the follow up cohort. Of the 468 ineligible, 282 (60.3%) had 'no live pregnancy outcome' (209 terminations of pregnancy (TOP) and 73 miscarriages, stillbirths, and infant deaths), 157 (33.5%) required a translator, and 29 (6.2%) were excluded for other reasons. TOP rates varied by the type of fetal CNV detected: 49.3% (109/221) for pathogenic CNVs, 18.2% (58/319) for variants of uncertain significance and 3.3% (42/1292) where no clinically significant CNV was reported on CMA. Almost 77% of invitation letters were successfully delivered (1047/1364), and the subsequent participation rate in the follow up cohort was 19.2% (201/1047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides Australia's first population-based data on perinatal outcomes following prenatal diagnostic testing with CMA. The relatively high rates of pregnancy loss for those with a prenatal diagnosis of a CNV presented a challenge for establishing a paediatric cohort to examine long term outcomes. Recruiting a mother-child cohort via prenatal ascertainment is a complex and resource-intensive process, but an important step in understanding the impact of a CNV diagnosis in pregnancy and beyond.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12620000446965p; Registered on April 6, 2020.

Perinatal outcomes and genomic characteristics of fetal copy number variants: An individual record linkage study of 713 pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the perinatal outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with a pathogenic copy number variant (CNV) or variant of uncertain significance (VUS); and to characterize these variants in terms of testing indication, genomic location, size, and inheritance.

METHODS

Retrospective study of singleton pregnancies with a pathogenic CNV or VUS from a single laboratory during 2012-2018. Probabilistic record linkage between the prenatal diagnosis dataset and perinatal outcome data for births from 20 weeks gestation was performed. If no birth record was found, this implied a pregnancy loss <20 weeks.

RESULTS

We included 6945 prenatal microarray results; a pathogenic CNV was detected in 230 (3.3%, 95% CI: 2.9%-3.8%) and a VUS in 483 (7.0%, 95% CI: 6.4%-7.6%). Of pregnancies with a pathogenic CNV, 20.0% (95% CI: 15.3%-25.6%) had a live birth, 3.0% (95% CI: 1.5%-6.2%) had a perinatal death (stillbirth or neonatal death), and 77% (95% CI: 71.1%-81.9%) had no birth record. Of those with a VUS, 64.4% (95% CI: 60.0%-68.5%) had a live birth, 1.8% (95% CI: 1.0%-3.5%) had a perinatal death, and no birth record was found for 33.7% (95% CI: 29.7%-38.1%). Most pathogenic CNVs (61.1%) were <7 Mb in size. The most common microdeletion syndromes were DiGeorge, Wolf-Hirschhorn, and Cri-du-chat syndromes.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overview of perinatal outcomes and frequency of recurrent CNVs observed in the prenatal microarray era.

Study protocol: childhood outcomes of fetal genomic variants: the PrenatAL Microarray (PALM) cohort study

BACKGROUND

The implementation of genomic testing in pregnancy means that couples have access to more information about their child's genetic make-up before birth than ever before. One of the resulting challenges is the management of genetic variations with unclear clinical significance. This population-based study will help to close this critical knowledge gap through a multidisciplinary cohort study of children with and without genomic copy number variants (CNVs) diagnosed before birth. By comparing children with prenatally-ascertained CNVs to children without a CNV, we aim to (1) examine their developmental, social-emotional and health status; (2) measure the impact of prenatal diagnosis of a CNV on maternal perceptions of child health, behavior and development; and (3) determine the proportion of prenatally-ascertained CNVs of unknown or uncertain significance that are reclassified as benign or pathogenic after 2 or more years.

METHODS

This study will establish and follow up a cohort of mother-child pairs who have had a prenatal diagnosis with a chromosomal microarray from 2013-2019 in the Australian state of Victoria. Children aged 12 months to 7 years will be assessed using validated, age-appropriate measures. The primary outcome measures will be the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence IV (WPSSI-IV) IQ score (2.5 to 7 year old's), the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (12-30 months old), and the Brief Infant- Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) score. Clinical assessment by a pediatrician will also be performed. Secondary outcomes will be scores obtained from the: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Maternal Postnatal Attachment Questionnaire, the Vulnerable Child Scale, Profile of Mood States, Parent Sense of Competence Scale. A descriptive analysis of the reclassification rates of CNVs after ≥2 years will be performed.

DISCUSSION

This study protocol describes the first Australian cohort study following children after prenatal diagnostic testing with chromosomal microarray. It will provide long-term outcomes of fetal genomic variants to guide evidence-based pre-and postnatal care. This, in turn, will inform future efforts to mitigate the negative consequences of conveying genomic uncertainty during pregnancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12620000446965p ; Registered on April 6, 2020.

Dealing with uncertain results from chromosomal microarray and exome sequencing in the prenatal setting: An international cross-sectional study with healthcare professionals

Objectives

To conduct qualitative interviews with healthcare providers working in different countries to understand their experiences of dealing with uncertain results from prenatal chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES).

Methods

Semi‐structured interviews with 31 healthcare providers who report or return prenatal CMA and/or ES results (clinicians, genetic counsellors and clinical scientists) in six countries with differing healthcare systems; Australia (4), Denmark (5), Netherlands (6), Singapore (4), Sweden (6) and United Kingdom (6). The topic guide explored the main sources of uncertainty and their management.

Results

There was variation in reporting practices both between and across countries for variants of uncertain significance, however, there was broad agreement on reporting practices for incidental findings. There was also variation in who decides what results are reported (clinical scientists or clinicians). Technical limitations and lack of knowledge (to classify variants and of prenatal phenotypes) were significant challenges, as were turnaround times and lack of guidelines.

Conclusion

Health professionals around the globe are dealing with similar sources of uncertainty, but managing them in different ways, Continued dialogue with international colleagues on ways of managing uncertain results is important to compare and contrast the benefits and limitations of the different approaches.

What's already known about this topic?

Chromosome microarray analysis and exome sequencing have increased diagnostic yield over karyotyping but have increased the incidence of uncertain results.

What does this study add?

Our findings highlight variation in reporting practices both between and across countries for variants of uncertain significance, although there is broad agreement on reporting practices for incidental findings.

International guidelines may help to standardise how we define and categorise variants, however, global uniformity on the management of uncertain results may not be a realistic or desirable goal.