Inhaled fluticasone dipropionate decreases levels of nitric oxide in recurrenty wheezy infants

European Respiratory Society statement on preschool wheezing disorders: updated definitions, knowledge gaps and proposed future research directions

Since the publication of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force reports on the management of preschool wheezing in 2008 and 2014, a large body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that the clinical phenotypes that were proposed (episodic (viral) wheezing and multiple-trigger wheezing) do not relate to underlying airway pathology and may not help determine response to treatment. Specifically, using clinical phenotypes alone may no longer be appropriate, and new approaches that can be used to inform clinical care are needed for future research. This ERS task force reviewed the literature published after 2008 related to preschool wheezing and has suggested that the criteria used to define wheezing disorders in preschool children should include age of diagnosis (0 to <6 years), confirmation of wheezing on at least one occasion, and more than one episode of wheezing ever. Furthermore, diagnosis and management may be improved by identifying treatable traits, including inflammatory biomarkers (blood eosinophils, aeroallergen sensitisation) associated with type-2 immunity and differential response to inhaled corticosteroids, lung function parameters and airway infection. However, more comprehensive use of biomarkers/treatable traits in predicting the response to treatment requires prospective validation. There is evidence that specific genetic traits may help guide management, but these must be adequately tested. In addition, the task force identified an absence of caregiver-reported outcomes, caregiver/self-management options and features that should prompt specialist referral for this age group. Priorities for future research include a focus on identifying 1) mechanisms driving preschool wheezing; 2) biomarkers of treatable traits and efficacy of interventions in those without allergic sensitisation/eosinophilia; 3) the need to include both objective outcomes and caregiver-reported outcomes in clinical trials; 4) the need for a suitable action plan for children with preschool wheezing; and 5) a definition of severe/difficult-to-treat preschool wheezing.

Lung function testing and inflammation markers for wheezing preschool children: A systematic review for the EAACI Clinical Practice Recommendations on Diagnostics of Preschool Wheeze

BACKGROUND

Preschool wheeze is highly prevalent; 30%-50% of children have wheezed at least once before age six. Wheezing is not a disorder; it is a symptom of obstruction in the airways, and it is essential to identify the correct diagnosis behind this symptom. An increasing number of studies provide evidence for novel diagnostic tools for monitoring and predicting asthma in the pediatric population. Several techniques are available to measure airway obstruction and airway inflammation, including spirometry, impulse oscillometry, whole-body plethysmography, bronchial hyperresponsiveness test, multiple breath washout test, measurements of exhaled NO, and analyses of various other biomarkers.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed all the existing techniques available for measuring lung function and airway inflammation in preschool children to assess their potential and clinical value in the routine diagnostics and monitoring of airway obstruction.

RESULTS

If applicable, measuring FEV1 using spirometry is considered useful. For those unable to perform spirometry, whole-body plethysmography and IOS may be useful. Bronchial reversibility to beta2-agonist and hyperresponsiveness test with running exercise challenge may improve the sensitivity of these tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The difficulty of measuring lung function and the lack of large randomized controlled trials makes it difficult to establish guidelines for monitoring asthma in preschool children.

Application of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in pediatric asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fractional concentration of Nitric Oxide in the exhaled air (FeNO) is a moderately good biomarker of type-2 airway inflammation, and its measurement is feasible also in children. The available evidence is still not enough to support the routine use of FeNO to diagnose or manage asthma in every patient in clinical practice. However, its role in identifying asthma with eosinophilic inflammation is of particular interest in the management of severe asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

In healthy subjects, FeNO levels increase with age and height, particularly in males, and are also influenced by ethnicity. FeNO measurement can support asthma diagnosis and help in predicting asthma development later in life in young children with recurrent wheezing. FeNO-guided asthma management is effective in reducing asthma exacerbations but may result in a higher daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids. FeNO can also be used as a marker to evaluate adherence to asthma treatment and predict response to different biologicals, especially Omalizumab and Dupilumab.

SUMMARY

This review outlines recent data on the application of FeNO in childhood-onset asthma diagnosis and management, as well as in phenotyping subjects with severe asthma who may benefit from monoclonal antibodies administration.

Nitric Oxide and Biological Mediators in Pediatric Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Asthma

BACKGROUND

In the context of the so-called unified airway theory, chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma may coexist. The inflammation underlying these conditions can be studied through the aid of biomarkers. Main body: We described the main biological mediators that have been studied in pediatric CRS and asthma, and, according to the available literature, we reported their potential role in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. As for CRS, we discussed the studies that investigated nasal nitric oxide (nNO), pendrin, and periostin. As for asthma, we discussed the role of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (feNO), the role of periostin, and that of biological mediators measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and exhaled air (volatile organic compounds, VOCs).

CONCLUSION

Among non-invasive biomarkers, nNO seems the most informative in CRS and feNO in asthma. Other biological mediators seem promising, but further studies are needed before they can be applied in clinical practice.

Exhaled biomarkers in childhood asthma: old and new approaches

Background

Asthma is a chronic condition usually characterized by underlying inflammation. The study of asthmatic inflammation is of the utmost importance for both diagnostic and monitoring purposes. The gold standard for investigating airway inflammation is bronchoscopy, with bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsy, but the invasiveness of such procedures limits their use in children. For this reason, in the last decades there has been a growing interest for the development of noninvasive methods.

Main body

In the present review, we describe the most important non-invasive methods for the study of airway inflammation in children, focusing on the measure of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (feNO), on the measure of the exhaled breath temperature (EBT) and on the analysis of both exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and exhaled air (Volatile Organic Compounds, VOCs), using targeted and untargeted approaches. We summarize what is currently known on the topic of exhaled biomarkers in childhood asthma, with a special emphasis on emerging approaches, underlining the role of exhaled biomarkers in the diagnosis, management and treatment of asthma, and their potential for the development of personalized treatments.

Conclusion

Among non-invasive methods to study asthma, exhaled breath analysis remains one of the most interesting approaches, feNO and “-omic” sciences seem promising for the purpose of characterizing biomarkers of this disease.

Monitoring asthma in childhood: lung function, bronchial responsiveness and inflammation

This review focuses on the methods available for measuring reversible airways obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and inflammation as hallmarks of asthma, and their role in monitoring children with asthma. Persistent bronchial obstruction may occur in asymptomatic children and is considered a risk factor for severe asthma episodes and is associated with poor asthma outcome. Annual measurement of forced expiratory volume in 1 s using office based spirometry is considered useful. Other lung function measurements including the assessment of BHR may be reserved for children with possible exercise limitations, poor symptom perception and those not responding to their current treatment or with atypical asthma symptoms, and performed on a higher specialty level. To date, for most methods of measuring lung function there are no proper randomised controlled or large longitudinal studies available to establish their role in asthma management in children. Noninvasive biomarkers for monitoring inflammation in children are available, for example the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide fraction, and the assessment of induced sputum cytology or inflammatory mediators in the exhaled breath condensate. However, their role and usefulness in routine clinical practice to monitor and guide therapy remains unclear, and therefore, their use should be reserved for selected cases.

Childhood asthma biomarkers: present knowledge and future steps

Asthma represents the most common chronic respiratory disease of childhood. Its current standard diagnosis relies on patient history of symptoms and confirmed expiratory airflow limitation. Nevertheless, the spectrum of asthma in clinical presentation is broad, and both symptoms and lung function may not always reflect the underlying airway inflammation, which can be determined by different pathogenetic mechanisms. For these reasons, the identification of objective biomarkers of asthma, which may guide diagnosis, phenotyping, management and treatment is of great clinical utility and might have a role in the development of personalized therapy. The availability of non-invasive methods to study and monitor disease inflammation is of relevance especially in childhood asthma. In this sense, a promising role might be played by the measurement of exhaled biomarkers, such as exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) and molecules in exhaled breath condensate (EBC). Furthermore, recent studies have shown encouraging results with the application of the novel metabolomic approach to the study of exhaled biomarkers. In this paper the existing knowledge in the field of asthma biomarkers, with a special focus on exhaled biomarkers, will be highlighted.

Monitoring asthma in children

The goal of asthma treatment is to obtain clinical control and reduce future risks to the patient. To reach this goal in children with asthma, ongoing monitoring is essential. While all components of asthma, such as symptoms, lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and inflammation, may exist in various combinations in different individuals, to date there is limited evidence on how to integrate these for optimal monitoring of children with asthma. The aims of this ERS Task Force were to describe the current practise and give an overview of the best available evidence on how to monitor children with asthma. 22 clinical and research experts reviewed the literature. A modified Delphi method and four Task Force meetings were used to reach a consensus. This statement summarises the literature on monitoring children with asthma. Available tools for monitoring children with asthma, such as clinical tools, lung function, bronchial responsiveness and inflammatory markers, are described as are the ways in which they may be used in children with asthma. Management-related issues, comorbidities and environmental factors are summarised. Despite considerable interest in monitoring asthma in children, for many aspects of monitoring asthma in children there is a substantial lack of evidence.

Inhaled Corticosteroids Should Be Used in Infants and Preschoolers with Recurrent Wheezing

The infant or child presenting to the physician's office with persistent or recurrent wheezing during the first 2 years of life poses, often times, a diagnostic dilemma, and a therapeutic challenge. Until very recently, no guidelines were present to help the clinician navigate the very limited treatment options. The diagnosis of asthma in the very young is primarily difficult because of the lack of consistency of what is called asthma, and the failure to recognize the different phenotypes of asthma at different ages. Many classification and phenotypic descriptions have been proposed, but they continue to cause more confusion to already confused parents and perplexed physicians. Although these studies have provided much insight into the natural history of wheezy disorders, they have failed to affect clinical management to a large extent. Controversy persists as to when and why and how long inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) should be used in wheezy infants. Based on the current knowledge in this age group, ICS seems to be indicated in infants with multi-triggers wheeze, and in infants with a positive asthma predictive index. This article reviews the different phenotypic presentations of wheezy infant, the role and indications of ICS in this situation, and, finally, suggests a treatment plan based on the apparent cause of wheezing.

Exhaled nitric oxide fractions are well correlated with clinical control in recurrent infantile wheeze treated with inhaled corticosteroids

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive marker of bronchial inflammation in asthma. However, the interest of FeNO measurement remained limited in infantile wheeze. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of FeNO off-line measurement in very young children with recurrent wheeze and to assess whether clinical control of infantile wheeze correlates with FeNO levels. Two exhalation samples were collected in mylar balloon during quite tidal breathing. FeNO measurements were performed off-line by a NO analyzer. The participating patients were aged ≤36 months, wheezes had started before the age of 24 months, and they were receiving maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids for at least 3 months duration. The studied population comprised of 40 uncontrolled infants with persistent wheezy respiratory symptoms, median age 14.5 months, and 40 with optimal controlled infantile wheeze, median age 14 months. The reproducibility was excellent (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001). There was a significant difference in FeNO levels between the groups of persistent wheeze and well-controlled infants: 19.8 (2.5-99.3) ppb vs. 7.7 (0.6-29.5) ppb, p < 0.0001. At a FeNO level >15 ppb, the predictive values for uncontrolled disease were as follows: positive predictive value = 65%, negative predictive value = 90%. FeN0 levels were not increased by atopy or passive tobacco. Off-line assessment of FeNO is feasible, reproducible, and well accepted in wheezy very young children. Optimal clinical control of infantile wheeze appeared to be associated with the control of bronchial inflammation when evaluated by FeNO measurements.

Consistently high levels of exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels in children are unstable because they are regulated by many potent factors. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of eNO levels between a long interval and other lung functions in normal and asthmatic children.

METHODS

Eighty-three elementary school children (aged 11-12 years; male : female, 39 : 44) participated in this study. Lung function, airway resistance and eNO levels were measured twice: the first measurement was in autumn 2007, and the second was one year later.

RESULTS

There were 62 non-asthmatic control children (male : female, 31 : 31) and 21 asthmatic children (male : female, 8 : 13). In both the first and the second examination, the levels of eNO in children with asthma were higher than those in children without asthma. The parameters of lung function and the respiratory resistance in children without asthma showed a good correlation between the results of the first and second examinations. The eNO level in non-asthmatic children showed a good correlation between the two. On the other hand, the peripheral airway parameters of lung function and the respiratory resistance in children with asthma were not correlated between the first and the second examinations. The eNO level in these patients was well correlated between the two examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the eNO level showed good reproducibility in children with and without asthma. The eNO level is therefore considered to be a useful marker for reproducibly evaluating a subject's airway condition.

Effect of inhaled fluticasone on lung function in infants with recurrent wheezing: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are used to treat infants with troublesome asthma-like symptoms but their effect on the lung function of these young patients is controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four infants with recurrent wheezing (more than 3 episodes) and family history of asthma completed this randomised, parallel, double-blind, controlled trial to compare the effect on lung function (main endpoint) of once-daily inhaled fluticasone (375 microg) versus placebo for 3 months. Pulmonary function was measured while infants were asymptomatic, using the raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique (spirometry-like), and values were converted to z-scores.

RESULTS

The fluticasone group showed a significant increase in forced flows, (p < 0.001), a lower number of physician diagnosed wheezing episodes (p < 0.002), and a significant decrease in the parent-reported number of wheezing episodes per month (p < 0.03), as compared to placebo. One third of parents in the placebo group reported a clinical improvement in their infants. There was no significant difference in morning plasma cortisol between groups at entry or discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that once-daily treatment with 375 microg fluticasone increased forced flows and controlled symptoms in infants with recurrent wheezing without altering plasma cortisol levels. The spirometry-like technique is a useful tool to objectively assess the efficacy of anti-asthma medications in infants with repeated troublesome asthma-like symptoms.

Exhaled nitric oxide measurements in the first 2 years of life: methodological issues, clinical and epidemiological applications

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a useful tool to diagnose and monitor eosinophilic bronchial inflammation in asthmatic children and adults. In children younger than 2 years of age FeNO has been successfully measured both with the tidal breathing and with the single breath techniques. However, there are a number of methodological issues that need to be addressed in order to increase the reproducibility of the FeNO measurements within and between infants. Indeed, a standardized method to measure FeNO in the first 2 years of life would be extremely useful in order to meaningfully interpret FeNO values in this age group. Several factors related to the measurement conditions have been found to influence FeNO, such as expiratory flow, ambient NO and nasal contamination. Furthermore, the exposure to pre- and postnatal risk factors for respiratory morbidity has been shown to influence FeNO values. Therefore, these factors should always be assessed and their association with FeNO values in the specific study population should be evaluated and, eventually, controlled for.

There is evidence consistently suggesting that FeNO is increased in infants with family history of atopy/atopic diseases and in infants with recurrent wheezing. These findings could support the hypothesis that eosinophilic bronchial inflammation is present at an early stage in those infants at increased risk of developing persistent respiratory symptoms and asthma. Furthermore, it has been shown that FeNO measurements could represent a useful tool to assess bronchial inflammation in other airways diseases, such as primary ciliary dyskinesia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and cystic fibrosis. Further studies are needed in order to improve the reproducibility of the measurements, and large prospective studies are warranted in order to evaluate whether FeNO values measured in the first years of life can predict the future development of asthma or other respiratory diseases.

[Recurrent wheezing in three year-olds: facts and opportunities]

The 3 year-old group of children has an increased incidence and prevalence of recurrent wheezing episodes. There are different subgroups, who give different inflammatory responses to different triggering agents, and subgroups that differ in aetiopathology and immunopathology. Current diagnostic methods (exhaled nitric oxide in multiple breaths, nitric oxide in exhaled air condensate, induced sputum, broncho-alveolar lavage and endo-bronchial biopsy), enable the inflammatory pattern to be identified and to give the most effective and safe treatment. The various therapeutic options for treatment are reviewed, such as inhaled glucocorticoids when the inflammatory phenotype is eosinophilic, and leukotriene receptor antagonists, when the inflammatory phenotype is predominantly neutrophilic. In accordance with the current recommendations, for the diagnosis as well as for the therapy initiated in children of this age, they must be regularly reviewed, so that if the benefit is not clear, the treatment must be stopped and an alternative diagnosis and treatment considered. The start of treatment should be determined depending on the intensity and frequency of the symptoms, with the aim of decreasing morbidity and increasing the quality of life of the patient.

Management of asthma in preschool children with inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review the recently published studies addressing various treatment approaches for asthma in preschool children.

RECENT FINDINGS

The heterogeneity of wheezing in the preschool years complicates the study of asthma in this age group. Once children at highest risk for persistence of wheezing are identified, various management strategies may be thoroughly studied. Several recent studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of both inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists in the management of early childhood asthma. In addition to examining clinical efficacy, studies investigating the effects of these treatment modalities on the underlying airway inflammation have recently increased in number and quality and confirm the anti-inflammatory actions of these therapeutic strategies in the preschool child with asthma.

SUMMARY

Evidence for the preferred treatment strategies for persistent asthma in young children remains incomplete. Based on the current body of evidence, there is rationale for further investigation of these management strategies, including direct comparisons between inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists, as well as the role of long-acting beta-agonists, potentially targeting the subpopulations of early childhood with wheezing who are at highest risk for persistence of asthma symptoms.

Seasonal variation and environmental predictors of exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma

The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a measure of airway inflammation, shows promise as a noninvasive tool to guide asthma management, but there is a paucity of longitudinal data about seasonal variation and environmental predictors of FeNO in children. The objective of this project was to evaluate how environmental factors affect FeNO concentrations over a 12-month study period among children with doctor diagnosed asthma. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 225 tobacco-smoke exposed children age 6-12 years with doctor-diagnosed asthma including measures of FeNO, medication use, settled indoor allergens (dust mite, cat, dog, and cockroach), and tobacco smoke exposure. Baseline geometric mean FeNO was 12.4 ppb (range 1.9-60.9 ppb). In multivariable analyses, higher baseline FeNO levels, atopy, and fall season were associated with increased FeNO levels, measured 6 and 12 months after study initiation, whereas inhaled steroid use, summer season, and increasing nicotine exposure were associated with lower FeNO levels. In secondary analyses of allergen sensitization, only sensitization to dust mite and cat were associated with increased FeNO levels. Our data demonstrate that FeNO levels over a year long period reflected baseline FeNO levels, allergen sensitization, season, and inhaled steroid use in children with asthma. These results indicate that FeNO levels are responsive to common environmental triggers as well as therapy for asthma in children. Clinicians and researchers may need to consider an individual's baseline FeNO levels to manage children with asthma.

[Exhaled nitric oxide in children: a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation]

This article is an academic review of the application in children of the measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO). We outline the joint American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society recommendations for online measurement of FENO in both cooperating children and children unable to cooperate, offline measurement with uncontrolled exhalation flow rate, offline measurement with controlled exhalation flow rate using a dynamic flow restrictor, and offline measurement during tidal breathing in children unable to cooperate. This is followed by a review of the normal range of values for single-breath online measurements obtained with a chemiluminescence FENO analyzer (geometric mean, 9.7 parts per billion [ppb]; upper limit of the 95% confidence interval, 25.2 ppb). FENO values above 17 ppb have a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 80% for predicting asthma of an eosinophilic phenotype. We discuss the response of FENO values to anti-inflammatory treatment and the use of this marker in the management of asthma. Results obtained with chemiluminescence and portable electrochemical analyzers are compared. The portable devices offer the possibility--in children over 5 years of age--of accurate and universal monitoring of exhaled nitric oxide concentrations, an emerging marker of eosinophilic inflammation in asthma that facilitates diagnosis, monitoring of disease progression, and assessment of response to therapy.

Exhaled nitric oxide distinguishes between subgroups of preschool children with respiratory symptoms

BACKGROUND

Respiratory symptoms are common in early childhood. The clinical characterization of disease presentation and hence its likely disease progression has so far been proven difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether exhaled nitric oxide (NO) could be helpful to distinguish between subgroups of nonwheezy and wheezy young children less than 4 years of age.

METHODS

Exhaled NO was measured in 391 children (age 3-47 months) with nonwheezy and wheezy respiratory symptoms. Children were divided into 3 groups: children with recurrent cough but no history of wheeze (group 1), with early recurrent wheeze and a loose index for the prediction of asthma at school age (group 2), and with frequent recurrent wheeze and a stringent index for the prediction of asthma at school age (group 3).

RESULTS

Children from group 3 showed significantly higher median (interquartile range) fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) levels (11.7 [11.85]) than children from groups 1 (6.5 [5.5]; P < .001) and 2 (6.4 [6.5]; P < .001). No difference in FeNO levels was found between children from groups 1 and 2 (P = .91).

CONCLUSION

Wheezy young children less than 4 years of age with a stringent index for the prediction of asthma at school age have elevated levels of FeNO compared with children with recurrent wheeze and a loose index for the prediction of asthma at school age or children with recurrent cough.

Exhaled nitric oxide in childhood asthma: a review

As an 'inflammometer', the fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (Fe(NO)) is increasingly used in the management of paediatric asthma. Fe(NO) provides us with valuable, additional information regarding the nature of underlying airway inflammation, and complements lung function testing and measurement of airway hyper-reactivity. This review focuses on clinical applications of Fe(NO) in paediatric asthma. First, Fe(NO) provides us with a practical tool to aid in the diagnosis of asthma and distinguish patients who will benefit from inhaled corticosteroids from those who will not. Second, Fe(NO) is helpful in predicting exacerbations, and predicting successful steroid reduction or withdrawal. In atopic asthmatic children Fe(NO) is beneficial in adjusting steroid doses, discerning those patients who require additional therapy from those whose medication dose could feasibly be reduced. In pre-school children Fe(NO) may be of help in the differential diagnosis of respiratory symptoms, and may potentially allow for better targeting and monitoring of anti-inflammatory treatment.

Methodological aspects of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in infants

Guidelines for the measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) recommend refraining from lung function tests (LFT) and certain foods and beverages before performing FE(NO) measurements, as they may lead to transiently altered FE(NO) levels. Little is known of such factors in infants. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether forced expiratory maneuvers, sedation, nasal contamination, and breastfeeding affect FE(NO) values in infants. FE(NO) was measured off-line during tidal breathing by means of a facemask covering nose and mouth. FE(NO) measurements were performed in 45 sedated infants (mean age 12.1 months) who underwent LFT because of airway diseases and in 83 unsedated healthy infants (mean age 4.3 months). In infants with airway diseases, no difference was found in FE(NO) values before and 5 min after LFT (n = 19 infants, p = 0.7) and FE(NO) values before sedation did not differ from FE(NO) values during sedation (n = 10 infants, p = 0.2). Oral FE(NO) values were significantly lower than mixed (nasal + oral) FE(NO) (n = 42 infants, p < 0.001). FE(NO) values before and 5 min after breastfeeding were not different (n = 11 healthy infants, p = 0.57). The short-term reproducibility in healthy infants (n = 54) was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94). We conclude that, in infants with airway diseases, LFT prior to FE(NO) measurement did not influence FE(NO) values and FE(NO) values did not change after sedation. Oral FE(NO) values were significantly lower than mixed (oral + nasal) FE(NO), and breastfeeding did not influence FE(NO). Short-term reproducibility in awake healthy infants was good.

Exhaled nitric oxide measurements: clinical application and interpretation

The use of exhaled nitric oxide measurements (F(E)NO) in clinical practice is now coming of age. There are a number of theoretical and practical factors which have brought this about. Firstly, F(E)NO is a good surrogate marker for eosinophilic airway inflammation. High F(E)NO levels may be used to distinguish eosinophilic from non-eosinophilic pathologies. This information complements conventional pulmonary function testing in the assessment of patients with non-specific respiratory symptoms. Secondly, eosinophilic airway inflammation is steroid responsive. There are now sufficient data to justify the claim that F(E)NO measurements may be used successfully to identify and monitor steroid response as well as steroid requirements in the diagnosis and management of airways disease. F(E)NO measurements are also helpful in identifying patients who do/do not require ongoing treatment with inhaled steroids. Thirdly, portable nitric oxide analysers are now available, making routine testing a practical possibility. However, a number of issues still need to be resolved, including the diagnostic role of F(E)NO in preschool children and the use of reference values versus individual F(E)NO profiles in managing patients with difficult or severe asthma.

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To report on recent studies on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on pulmonary function in young children with asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Inhaled corticosteroids are considered the most effective treatment for persistent asthma in children. Appropriate control of childhood asthma may prevent more serious disease or irreversible obstruction in later years. While some authors have described an improvement with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in young children, others found no clinical or functional benefit. Various studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids ameliorate clinical outcomes, and recently a study demonstrated improvement in pulmonary function in young children with asthma. The use of different study designs may explain the lack of consistent results and disagreement regarding the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in these patients.

SUMMARY

Based on the preponderance of evidence, treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in infants and young children with recurrent wheeze and risk factors of developing asthma appears to allow better control of the illness and improve the pulmonary function.

Asthma therapy for children under 5 years of age

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The evidence for effectiveness of currently used asthma medication for wheeze in young children is reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of the infant and preschool child with wheezing is complicated by the uncertainty with respect to the aetiology. Difficulties in defining phenotypes and objective outcome parameters combined with the transient nature of symptoms which often resolve spontaneously have confounded many therapeutic studies. Recent studies on the effect of pharmacotherapy in wheezing infants have tried to define a more homogeneous phenotype as well as make a selection of patients that are likely to respond to the studied drug. In addition, these studies have used lung function parameters and nitric oxide as one of the outcome measurements. Studies on the nature of inflammation and the development of airway remodelling in infants and young children are done to further define phenotypes.

SUMMARY

Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines and not even consensus statements on the right approach in pharmacological treatment of wheezing in infants and preschool children. The main issue still is the difficulty in coming to a correct diagnosis. Further studies are needed on the nature and the diagnostics of phenotypes and on the effect of early intervention.

Fluticasone improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

This study assessed the effects of treatment with fluticasone in children younger than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing and risk factors of developing asthma. This double-blind placebo-controlled study randomized children to receive fluticasone (125 mug; n = 14) or placebo (n = 12) twice daily for 6 months. Pulmonary function was assessed at the beginning and end, and parents filled out a daily diary recording respiratory symptoms, need for rescue medication, and emergency care. The SD score of maximum flow at functional residual capacity was -0.74 +/- 0.6 at the beginning and 0.44 +/- 1 at the end for the fluticasone group (p = 0.001), and -0.79 +/- 0.3 at the beginning and -0.78 +/- 1.4 at the end for the placebo group (p = 0.97). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) was observed between treatments. The percentage of symptom-free days was 91.3 +/- 7% for fluticasone and 83.9 +/- 10% for placebo (p = 0.05). The number of respiratory exacerbations was 2.1 +/- 1.7 and 4.1 +/- 3 (p = 0.04), and the percentage of days on albuterol was 8.6 +/- 6% and 16.3 +/- 9% (p = 0.028). Treatment with fluticasone twice daily for 6 months improves pulmonary function and clinical outcomes in children with asthma younger than 2 years.