Standardizing lung function laboratories for multicenter trials

Caesarean Section has no impact on lung function at the age of 15 years

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies and meta-analyses have shown an increased risk of childhood asthma for children born by Caesarean Section (C-Section).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of delivery by C-Section on lung function and asthma in adolescence in a population-based prospective birth cohort of healthy full term newborns.

METHODS

Questionnaire data on mode of delivery and asthma as well as spirometric measurements were available for 1850 adolescents at the age of 15 years, who participated in a follow-up examination of the GINIplus study. Linear regression models were used to examine associations between mode of delivery and lung function parameters. Two reference populations (Lunokid and GLI) were used to calculate the standardized z-scores of lung function parameters.

RESULTS

The mean difference in lung function parameters for adolescents born by C-Section, compared to vaginal delivery was not statistically significant. The risk for developing asthma by the age of 15 years was not higher in children born by C-Section-OR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.33) adjusted for sex, age, study center, and parental education level.

CONCLUSION

C-Section was not associated with impaired lung function or an increased risk of asthma at the age of 15 years in our birth cohort of healthy full term neonates.

Interpretation of pediatric lung function: impact of ethnicity

RATIONALE

To evaluate the appropriateness of spirometric and plethysmographic reference equations in healthy young children according to ethnic origin.

METHODS

Spirometry data were collated in 400 healthy children (214 Black and 186 White) aged 6-12 years. Of these children, 68 Black and 115 White children also undertook plethysmography. Results were expressed as percent predicted according to commonly used equations for spirometry and plethysmography.

RESULTS

Black children had lower lung function for a given height compared to White children. The magnitude and direction of these differences varied according to specific outcome. In the studied age range (6-12 years) the ethnic-specific Wang equations were adequate for spirometry (mean results approximating 100% predicted in both ethnic groups). By contrast, significant differences were found between observed and % predicted plethysmographic lung volumes according to published equations derived from White children: Among the Black children, function residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC) were on average, 14 and 6% lower than predicted, whereas mean residual volume (RV) and RV/TLC were 4 and 10% higher. Among White children, the Rosenthal equations gave the best fit, with the exception of FRC which was, on average, 9% lower than predicted.

CONCLUSION

Spirometry equations may suffice in Black children; however, interpretation of static lung volumes in Black children is limited due to inappropriate reference equations. More appropriate plethysmographic reference equations that are applicable to all ethnic groups across the entire age range are urgently needed.

Feasibility and variability of measuring the Lung Clearance Index in a multi-center setting

The Lung Clearance Index (LCI) is superior to spirometry in detecting early lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) and correlates with structural lung changes seen on CT scans. The LCI has the potential to become a novel outcome parameter for clinical and research purposes. However longitudinal studies are required to further prove its prognostic value. Multi-center design is likely to facilitate realization of such studies. Therefore the aim of the present study was to assess multi-center feasibility and inter-center variability of LCI measurements in healthy children and adolescents. Comparative measurements were performed in unselected patients with CF to confirm previous single-center results. LCI measurements were performed in eight centers using the EasyOne Pro, MBW Module (ndd Medical Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). The overall success rate for LCI measurements was 75.5%, leaving 102/151 measurements in healthy volunteers and 139/183 measurements in patients with CF for final analysis. Age ranged between 4 and 24 years. Mean LCI (range of means among centers) was 6.3 (6.0-6.5) in healthy volunteers and thus normal. Inter-center variability of center means was 2.9%, ANOVA including Schffé procedure demonstrated no significant inter-center differences (P > 0.05). Mean LCI (range of means among centers) was 8.2 (7.4-8.9) in CF and thus abnormal. Our study demonstrates good multi-center feasibility and low inter-center variability of the LCI in healthy volunteers when measured with the EasyOne Pro MBW module. Our data confirm published LCI data in CF. However, central coordination, quality control, regular training, and supervision during the entire study appear essential for successfully performing multi-center trials.

Discrepancies between pediatric laboratories in pulmonary function results from healthy children

BACKGROUND

Multi-center research studies that include pulmonary function as an objective outcome are increasingly important in pediatric respiratory medicine. The need for local controls rather than depending on published normative data for lung function remains debatable.

AIM

To compare pulmonary function in childhood controls with no respiratory symptoms from three centers in the United Kingdom and ascertain the extent to which current reference equations are appropriate for this population.

METHODS

Spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, and specific airways resistance (sRaw) were measured within specialized pediatric laboratories in children from three geographical locations throughout the UK (London, Leicester, and Glasgow), using identical equipment, software and standard operating procedures. Results were compared between centers and in relation to recent or commonly used UK pediatric reference values.

RESULTS

Pulmonary function was assessed in 94 healthy children (mean (SD) age: 7.7 (0.6) years; 88% white Caucasians; ∼30 from each center). There were no significant differences in background demographics or spirometric outcomes when compared between centers. By contrast, statistically significant differences in plethysmographic lung volumes and sRaw were observed between-centers. Significant differences in relation to published reference data for white subjects were noted for FEV(1) in all three centers and occasionally for other lung function measures but the differences from predicted values were small (within ± 0.5 z-score) and not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

After appropriate inter-laboratory standardization, spirometric measurements in children can be measured in different centers without evidence of systematic differences. However, even after extensive standardization procedures, plethysmographic measures appear more prone to inter-center differences and cannot, at present, be reliably compared across centers without incorporating controls at each location.

Comprehensive integrated spirometry using raised volume passive and forced expirations and multiple-breath nitrogen washout in infants

With the rapid somatic growth and development in infants, simultaneous accurate measurements of lung volume and airway function are essential. Raised volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression (RTC) is widely used to generate forced expiration from an airway opening pressure of 30 cmH(2)O (V(30)). The (dynamic) functional residual capacity (FRC(dyn)) remains the lung volume most routinely measured. The aim of this study was to develop comprehensive integrated spirometry that included all subdivisions of lung volume at V(30) or total lung capacity (TLC(30)). Measurements were performed on 17 healthy infants aged 8.6-119.7 weeks. A commercial system for multiple-breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) to measure lung volumes and a custom made system to perform RTC were used in unison. A refined automated raised volume RTC and the following two novel single maneuvers with dual volume measurements were performed from V(30) during a brief post-hyperventilation apneic pause: (1) the passive expiratory flow was integrated to produce the inspiratory capacity (IC) and the static (passive) FRC (FRC(st)) was estimated by initiating MBNW after end-passive expiration; (2) RTC was initiated late during passive expiration, flow was integrated to produce the slow vital capacity ((j)SVC) and the residual volume (RV) was measured by initiating MBNW after end-expiration while the jacket (j) was inflated. Intrasubject FRC(dyn) and FRC(st) measurements overlapped (p=0.6420) but neither did with the RV (p<0.0001). Means (95% confidence interval) of FRC(dyn), IC, FRC(st), (j)SVC, RV, forced vital capacity and tidal volume were 21.2 (19.7-22.7), 36.7 (33.0-40.4), 21.2 (19.6-22.8), 40.7 (37.2-44.2), 18.1 (16.6-19.7), 40.7 (37.1-44.2) and 10.2 (9.6-10.7)ml/kg, respectively. Static lung volumes and capacities at V(30) and variables from the best forced expiratory flow-volume curve were dependent on age, body length and weight. In conclusion, we developed a comprehensive physiologically integrated approach for in-depth investigation of lung function at V(30) in infants.

The EPICure study: comparison of pediatric spirometry in community and laboratory settings

RATIONALE

Accuracy of spirometry testing is a prerequisite for its use as an objective outcome measure in large epidemiological studies. We compared spirometry measurements obtained by trained pediatricians in a variety of school settings with those obtained in the laboratory by respiratory physiologists.

METHODS

Following a 3-day training course, three pediatricians carried out spirometry in children born extremely preterm (EP) and age matched controls in schools across the UK and Ireland (The EPICure study). A subgroup had repeated measurements in the laboratory. Spirometric flows and volumes were expressed as Z-scores. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate within-subject differences.

RESULTS

Fifty children (40% boys), 37 (74%) of whom were born EP, with a mean age 10.8 years had paired spirometry results (average interval between tests: 20.3 weeks). There was no statistically significant difference between any of the outcome variables: mean (95% CI of difference) in Z-scores [school-laboratory]) being 0.0 (-0.1; 0.1) for FEV(1), 0.1 (-0.1; 0.3) for FVC, -0.1 (-0.3; 0.1) for FEF(25-75), and 0.0 (-0.3; 0.1) for FEV(1)/FVC. Within individuals, the 95% limits of agreement for repeated measures were within +/- 1 Z-score for FEV(1) and FVC, and within +/- 1.5 Z-score for FEF(25-75) and FEV(1)/FVC.

CONCLUSION

With appropriate training, quality control, and support, pediatric spirometry can reliably be performed outside the lung function laboratory.