Increased adherence to CFF practice guidelines for pulmonary medications correlates with improved FEV1

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of guidelines in rare diseases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Rare diseases present a challenge to guideline implementation due to a low prevalence in the general population and the unfamiliarity of healthcare professionals. Existing literature in more common diseases references barriers and facilitators to guideline implementation. This systematic review aims to identify these barriers and facilitators in rare diseases from existing literature.

METHODS

A multi-stage strategy included searching MEDLINE PubMed, EMBASE Ovid, Web of Science and Cochrane library from the earliest date available to April 2021, Orphanet journal hand-search, a pearl-growing strategy from a primary source and reference/citation search was performed. The Integrated Checklist of Determinants of Practice which comprises of twelve checklists and taxonomies, informed by 57 potential determinants was selected as a screening tool to identify determinants that warrant further in-depth investigation to inform design of future implementation strategies.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were included, most of which were conducted in the United States (54.5%). There were 168 barriers across 36 determinants (37 studies) and 52 facilitators across 22 determinants (22 studies). Fifteen diseases were included across eight WHO ICD-11 disease categories. Together individual health professional factors and guideline factors formed the majority of the reported determinants (59.5% of barriers and 53.8% of facilitators). Overall, the three most reported individual barriers were the awareness/familiarity with the recommendation, domain knowledge and feasibility. The three most reported individual facilitators were awareness/familiarity with the recommendation, agreement with the recommendation and ability to readily access the guidelines. Resource barriers to implementation included technology costs, ancillary staff costs and more cost-effective alternatives. There was a paucity of studies reporting influential people, patient advocacy groups or opinion leaders, or organisational factors influencing implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Key barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in the setting of rare diseases were at the individual health professional and guideline level. Influential people and organisational factors were relatively under-reported and warrant exploration, as does increasing the ability to access the guidelines as a potential intervention.

Provider Reactions to Opioid-Prescribing Report Cards

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prescribers' reactions and self-reported intentions to change prescribing behavior in response to opioid-prescribing report cards.

DESIGN

We surveyed a sample of licensed prescribers in the state of Colorado registered with the state's prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP).

SETTING

In 2018, Colorado disseminated tailored opioid-prescribing report cards to increase use of the PDMP and improve opioid prescribing. Report cards reflected individual prescribing history and compared individuals with an aggregate of others in the same specialty. Surveys were sent to approximately 29 000 prescribers registered with the PDMP 12 weeks after report card distribution. If respondents were not sent a report card, they were shown a sample report. Respondents were asked about their perceptions of the usefulness of the information and intentions to change their prescribing.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 3784 prescribers responded to the survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Respondents were asked about their attitudes and reactions to an opioid-prescribing report card. Answers were given in the form of a 5-point Likert scale or multiple-choice questions.

RESULTS

Of those who responded, 53.6% were male and nearly half (49.5%) had spent more than 20 years in practice. Among prescribers who recalled receiving a report card, most felt the reports were easy to understand (87.4%) and provided new information (82.8%). Two-thirds of prescribers who saw their reports felt the information accurately reflected their prescribing practices. Overall, 40.0% reported they planned to change their prescribing behaviors as a result of the information provided. The most useful metrics identified by prescribers were the number of patients with multiple providers and the number of patients receiving dangerous combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, perceptions of the usefulness and accuracy of the report cards were positive. Understanding how the reports are perceived is a key factor to their use and influence. Further tailoring of the report to prescribers of different specialties and experience may enhance the effectiveness of the report cards.

Improved outcomes in cystic fibrosis using modified Re-Education of Airway Clearance Technique (REACT) programme

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is known to reduce lung function as measured by per cent predicted for the forced expiratory volume in the first second (ppFEV₁) over time. Our paediatric CF programme demonstrated significant gaps in benchmarked ppFEV₁ predicted compared with the national median. Our objective was to assess whether the implementation of a modified Re-Education of Airway Clearance Techniques (REACT) programme could lead to an improvement in lung function as measured by ppFEV₁.

METHODS

This 2-year prospective quality improvement study at Lurie Children's CF Center for children aged >6 years used improvement methodology to implement a modified REACT programme. Outcome measures were assessed for our entire programme via the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) and statistical process control. Comparisons were also made before and after REACT for outcome measures.

RESULTS

By the end of implementation, monthly participation rate achieved 100%. Using CFFPR data and SPC, median ppFEV₁ increased by 3.9%, whereas only body mass index (BMI) as a secondary outcome increased. Comparison of pre and post REACT showed improvements in average ppFEV₁ (95% vs 96%, p<0.0001), FEF_25%-75% (82% vs 83%, p=0.0590), rate of ppFEV1 decline (+2% vs -4%, p=0.0262) and BMI percentile (57% vs 60%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a modified REACT at Lurie Children's paediatric CF programme led to an increase in ppFEV₁, FEF_25%-75% and BMI percentile.

Identifying exceptional cystic fibrosis care services: combining statistical process control with focus groups

Background

The Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Registry collects clinical data on all patients attending specialist CF centres in the UK. These data have been used to make comparisons between centres on key outcomes such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) using simple rankings, which promote the assumption that those with the highest measures provide ‘better’ care.

Objectives

To explore whether or not using statistical ‘process control’ charts that move away from league tables and adjusting for case mix (age, where appropriate; sex; CF genotype; pancreatic sufficiency; and socioeconomic status) could identify exceptional CF care services in terms of clinically meaningful outcomes. Then, using insight from patients and clinicians on what structures, processes and policies are necessary for delivering good CF care, to explore whether or not care is associated with observed differences in outcomes.

Design

Cross-sectional analyses.

Setting

Specialist CF centres in the UK.

Participants

Patients aged ≥ 6 years attending specialist CF centres and clinicians at these centres.

Main outcome measures

FEV1% predicted.

Data sources

Annual reviews taken from the UK CF Registry (2007–15).

Results

We studied FEV1 in many different ways and in different periods. In our analyses of both adult and paediatric centres, we observed that some centres showed repeated evidence of ‘special-cause variation’, with mean FEV1 being greater than the mean in some cases and lower than the mean in others. Some of these differences were explained by statistical adjustment for different measures of case mix, such as age, socioeconomic status, genotype and pancreatic sufficiency. After adjustment, there was some remaining evidence of special-cause variation for some centres. Our data at these centres suggest that there may be an association with the use of intravenous antibiotics. Workshops and focus groups with clinicians at paediatric and adult centres identified a number of structures, processes and policies that were felt to be associated with good care. From these, questionnaires for CF centre directors were developed and disseminated. However, the response rate was low, limiting the questionnaires’ use. Focus groups with patients to gain their insights into what is necessary for the delivery of good care identified themes similar to those identified by clinicians, and a patient questionnaire was developed based on these insights.

Limitations

Our data analyses suggest that differences in intravenous antibiotic usage may be associated with centre-level outcomes; this needs to be explored further in partnership with the centres. Our survey of centre directors yielded a low response, making it difficult to gain useful knowledge to inform further discussions with sites.

Conclusions

Our findings confirm that the CF Registry can be used to identify differences in clinical outcomes between centres and that case mix might explain some of these differences. As such, adjustment for case mix is essential when trying to understand how and why centres differ from the mean.

Future work

Future work will involve exploring with clinicians how care is delivered so that we can understand associations between care and outcomes. Patients will also be asked for their perspectives on the care they receive.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Outcome evaluation of a pharmacy-based therapy management program for patients with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare medication adherence, pulmonary exacerbations, healthcare utilization, and costs for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who utilized a pharmacy-based therapy management program to a matched control group. We hypothesized that patient management services would be associated with better medication adherence, and thus require fewer visits to the emergency room or hospitalizations.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study used claims data from the MORE² claims Registry®. The sample consisted of CF patients, aged 6+, who had ≥1 pharmacy claim for inhaled tobramycin, inhaled aztreonam, ivacaftor, or dornase alfa from 6/2/2014-5/31/2015. Adherence was measured as proportion of days covered (PDC). Propensity score matching and multivariable regression techniques were used to compare outcomes in program participants to matched controls.

RESULTS

Of the 236 intervention and 724 control patients meeting selection criteria, 202 were propensity-matched from each cohort. Relative to the control cohort, program patients had 23% higher mean PDC for tobramycin (IRR = 1.23, P = 0.01) and were twice as likely to be adherent to tobramycin (PDC ≥ 80%) than matched controls (OR = 2.14, P = 0.04). Program patients had fewer ER visits (IRR = 0.52, P < 0.01) and slightly lower ER costs (IRR = 0.66, P = 0.06) than the control patients.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacy-based therapy management program for CF patients was associated with higher adherence to inhaled tobramycin and lower ER rates. Pharmacies that provide therapy management can support effective CF care management.

Trans-Atlantic collaboration: applying lessons learned from the US CF Foundation quality improvement initiative

Background

Between 2002 and 2006 France launched a national cystic fibrois (CF) newborn screening program; organized a network of specialized CF care centers; and issued CF diagnostic and treatment standards. To continue to build on this success in 2007 the Cystic Fibrosis Center of Expertise for Rare Diseases (CF CERD) of Nantes-Roscoff in partnership with the French CF Society, the French CF Association (Vaincre la Mucoviscidose), and all CF center leaders from across the country agreed to pursue center-level improvement in medical outcomes for people with CF by adapting the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation’s (US CFF) national initiative, Accelerating the Rate of Improvement in CF Care. To launch the Program to Improve Results and Expertise in CF (le Programme d’Amélioration des Résultats et de l’Expertise en Mucoviscidose - PHARE-M), French leaders pursued mentorship and guidance from leaders at the US CFF, the Dartmouth Institute (TDI), and clinical care teams at CF centers across the U.S.

Methods

The following activities enabled the Nantes-Roscoff CF CERD team members and a parent, involved with the French CF Association board and a quality engineer by training, to gain the leadership and quality improvement knowledge and skills necessary to implement the PHARE-M program: 1) regularly attending national meetings, tracking publications, and leveraging existing partnerships; 2) completing two sabbaticals to visit U.S. CF centers and enrolling in academic and professional training courses; and, 3) inviting US CFF and TDI leaders to France to meet key opinion leaders and frontline teams.

Conclusions

The Nantes-Roscoff CF CERD team successfully adapted the US CFF’s initiative to accelerate improvement in CF care by establishing a partnership with U.S. leaders to communicate and exchange strategies and lessons learned; intentionally studying and adapting the Clinical Microsystems approach to quality improvement; and learning directly from the experience of frontline teams in the U.S. They continue to partner with U.S. leaders and are seeking to collaborate with European colleagues to continue to improve care for individuals with CF and their families across Europe.

Rescue therapy within the UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry: An exploration of predictors of intravenous antibiotic use amongst adults with CF

Background and objective

Intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics are needed for rescue when preventative therapy fails to achieve stability among adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Understanding the distribution of i.v. days can provide insight into the care that adults with CF need. We aim to determine the baseline characteristics that are associated with higher i.v. use, in particular to test the hypothesis that prior‐year i.v. use is associated with future‐year i.v. use.

Methods

This is a cross‐sectional analysis of the 2013–2014 UK CF registry data. Stepwise logistic regression was performed using current‐year i.v. days as the dependent variable, and demographic variables including prior‐year i.v. days as the covariates. Based on these results, study sample was divided into clinically meaningful subgroups using analysis similar to tree‐based method.

Results

Data were available for 4269 adults in 2013 and 4644 adults in 2014. Prior‐year i.v. use was the strongest predictor for current‐year i.v. use followed by forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁). Adults with high prior‐year i.v. use (>14 days) continued to require high levels of i.v., regardless of FEV₁. Those with high prior‐year i.v. use and FEV₁ ≥70% had higher current‐year i.v. days compared to adults with low prior‐year i.v. use and FEV₁ <40% (28 days, interquartile range (IQR): 11–41 days vs 14 days, IQR: 0–28 days; Mann–Whitney P‐value <0.001 in 2013).

Conclusion

CF people with prior high levels of rescue often continue to need high levels of rescue even if they have good FEV₁. The reasons for this require further investigations.

Intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic is an important treatment option in cystic fibrosis and is also a marker of pulmonary exacerbations. Our study showed that previous‐year i.v. use is a strong predictor of current‐year i.v. use. This finding could help clinicians to identify people most at risk of future exacerbation.

Implementation of cystic fibrosis clinical pathways improved physician adherence to care guidelines

INTRODUCTION

There is significant variability in clinical outcomes, including growth and lung function, between the various cystic fibrosis (CF) centers. No specific or unique therapeutic practices have been identified to account for these differences. However, more uniform care within centers was associated with better outcomes. The objective of this study was to implement clinical pathways for diagnosis and treatment of nutritional failure and lung inflammation in order to achieve better health care provider adherence to center-specific, agreed-on practices.

METHODS

Agreed-on clinical pathway treatment plans for both nutrition and lower airway inflammation were implemented on January 1, 2010. The primary outcome measure was to evaluate if patients' diagnoses and treatments were consistent with the agreed-on clinical pathways.

RESULTS

The proportion of clinic visits from baseline to 18 months post-intervention where the provider completely followed nutrition clinical pathway increased from 57.72% to 79.49% (P = 0.049) and the proportion for lower airway inflammation clinical pathway increased from 65.85% to 86.32% (P = 0.035). The use of nutritional diagnosis and documentation of associated clinical pathway in the clinical plan increased from 16.26% to 61.54% and 56.10% to 94.87%, respectively. Similarly, diagnosis of lower airway inflammation and documentation related to their treatment plans increased from 1.63% to 43.59% and 30.08% to 87.18%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of clinical pathways for nutrition and lower airway inflammation issues resulted in more uniform care of CF patients. Having objective criteria for diagnoses and agreed-on treatment plans for each of those diagnoses allowed for monitoring and individual feedback. Increases in utilization of correct diagnoses and discussion of specific therapeutic interventions in the clinic notes were associated with increased adherence to clinical pathways. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:175-181. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Accurate reporting of adherence to inhaled therapies in adults with cystic fibrosis: methods to calculate "normative adherence"

BACKGROUND

Preventative inhaled treatments in cystic fibrosis will only be effective in maintaining lung health if used appropriately. An accurate adherence index should therefore reflect treatment effectiveness, but the standard method of reporting adherence, that is, as a percentage of the agreed regimen between clinicians and people with cystic fibrosis, does not account for the appropriateness of the treatment regimen. We describe two different indices of inhaled therapy adherence for adults with cystic fibrosis which take into account effectiveness, that is, "simple" and "sophisticated" normative adherence.

METHODS TO CALCULATE NORMATIVE ADHERENCE

Denominator adjustment involves fixing a minimum appropriate value based on the recommended therapy given a person's characteristics. For simple normative adherence, the denominator is determined by the person's Pseudomonas status. For sophisticated normative adherence, the denominator is determined by the person's Pseudomonas status and history of pulmonary exacerbations over the previous year. Numerator adjustment involves capping the daily maximum inhaled therapy use at 100% so that medication overuse does not artificially inflate the adherence level.

THREE ILLUSTRATIVE CASES

Case A is an example of inhaled therapy under prescription based on Pseudomonas status resulting in lower simple normative adherence compared to unadjusted adherence. Case B is an example of inhaled therapy under-prescription based on previous exacerbation history resulting in lower sophisticated normative adherence compared to unadjusted adherence and simple normative adherence. Case C is an example of nebulizer overuse exaggerating the magnitude of unadjusted adherence.

CONCLUSION

Different methods of reporting adherence can result in different magnitudes of adherence. We have proposed two methods of standardizing the calculation of adherence which should better reflect treatment effectiveness. The value of these indices can be tested empirically in clinical trials in which there is careful definition of treatment regimens related to key patient characteristics, alongside accurate measurement of health outcomes.

Accelerating implementation of biomedical research advances: critical elements of a successful 10 year Cystic Fibrosis Foundation healthcare delivery improvement initiative

CONTEXT SCIENTIFIC AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

Remarkable biomedical research advances have led to innovative and increasingly effective therapies. We highlight several scientific milestones in elucidating the pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis (CF) and review the therapies that have become available over the past 20 years.

IMPACT OF THE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE

In 2002, the CF Foundation launched a multifaceted quality improvement initiative to accelerate improvement in CF care. We present evidence of substantial improvement in process measures, such as more consistent outpatient follow-up, and key medical outcomes, including survival, pulmonary function and nutritional status.

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

We offer our perspective on factors critical to the success of the quality improvement initiative, including a compelling strategic plan and the commitment of the CF Foundation to its implementation; the investment in building improvement capacity at CF care centres; the engagement of people with CF and their families as partners; and the integration of quality improvement into the existing CF care framework.

DIRECTIONS FOR THE NEXT DECADE

In addition to a continued investment in building and sustaining improvement capacity at CF care centres, and deeper patient engagement, we will address the oppressive treatment burden. We will also complement the measurement of clinical outcomes with patient reported outcomes and healthcare costs for a balanced assessment of the quality and value of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Major advances in basic science and therapeutic development coupled with improvements in healthcare delivery have resulted in striking gains in medical outcomes for people with CF.

Pulmonary radiographic findings in young children with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary evaluation is one of the greatest challenges in children with cystic fibrosis who are younger than 6 years. Although chest CT can provide the most information for initial and progressive changes in cystic fibrosis, the radiation exposures can lead to significant cumulative exposure in children as they are followed with serial scanning to monitor early and progressive disease. Therefore the systematized study of chest radiographs using the Brasfield score has been used scientifically with the aim of evaluating the evolution of pulmonary abnormalities in children with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the radiologic findings in children younger than 6 years with cystic fibrosis. We used the Brasfield score to compare radiographs performed in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa vs. oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and to compare radiographs in children with early vs. delayed diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 254 chest radiographs from 67 children who had undergone material cultures of the airways as part of routine care were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. The statistical analysis was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

Approximately 35.8% of chest radiographs had a Brasfield score lower than 21 points, which is compatible with potentially irreversible pulmonary disease. Brasfield scores decreased (this score decreases with increasing disease severity) in older children, and both bacterial colonization with Pseudomonas and later diagnosis were associated with lower (greater disease) scores.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of radiographs using the Brasfield score demonstrated the most important pulmonary findings in cystic fibrosis and identified the age group when these alterations began to appear more pronounced.

The impact of switching to the new global lung function initiative equations on spirometry results in the UK CF registry

BACKGROUND

The Quanjer et al. Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI)-2012 multi-ethnic all-age reference equations for spirometry are endorsed by all major respiratory societies and are the new gold standard. Before the GLI equations are implemented for use in CF patients, the impact of changing equations from those currently used needs to be better understood.

METHODS

Annual review data submitted to the UK CF Trust Registry between 2007 and 2011 were used to calculate %predicted FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC using three widely used reference equations (Wang-Hankinson and Knudson) and the new GLI-2012 equations.

RESULTS

Overall, Knudson and Wang equations overestimated %predicted values in paediatric patients, such that a greater proportion of patients had lung function values in the normal range. Within individual patients, the impact of switching equations varied greatly depending on the patients' age, and which equations were used.

CONCLUSIONS

A unified approach to interpreting spirometric lung function measurements would help facilitate more appropriate comparison both within and between centres and countries. Interpretation of longitudinal measurements using a continuous reference equation across all-ages, like the GLI, may further improve our understanding of CF lung disease.

Never the twain shall meet?--a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research

Background

Many of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science.

Discussion

Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature.

Summary

There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research.