1
|
Berntsson H, Thien A, Hind D, Stewart L, Mahzabin M, Tung WS, Bradburn M, Kurien M. Interventions for Managing Late Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Pelvic Radiotherapy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:318-334. [PMID: 38431427 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Pelvic radiotherapy can induce gastrointestinal injury and symptoms, which can affect quality of life. We assessed interventions for managing these symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of randomised controlled trials published between January 1990 and June 2023 from databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN and grey literature sources was conducted. Meta-analyses were carried out using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to produce overall treatment differences with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies (2392 participants) of varying methodological quality were included. 4% formalin was superior to sucralfate for improving gastrointestinal symptom score (standardised mean difference [SMD] -1.07, 95% confidence interval -1.48 to -0.65). Argon plasma coagulation (APC) was inferior to sucralfate (SMD 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.59). Counselling positively influenced symptom score (SMD -0.53, 95% confidence interval -0.76 to -0.29), whereas hyperbaric oxygen therapy showed conflicting results. Sucralfate combined with APC increased endoscopic markers of moderate-severe bleeding versus APC alone (risk ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 4.55). No definite conclusions on pain, incontinence, diarrhoea, tenesmus or quality of life interventions were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS Small study sizes, methodological quality and heterogeneity limit support of any individual intervention. APC and 4% formalin seem to be promising interventions, with further larger randomised controlled trials now warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Berntsson
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - A Thien
- Department of General Surgery, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
| | - D Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - L Stewart
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Mahzabin
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - W S Tung
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Bradburn
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Kurien
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee MJ, Lee E, Bradburn M, Hind D, Strong EB, Din F, Wysocki AP, Lund J, Moffatt C, Morton J, Senapati A, Jones H, Brown SR. Research and practice priorities in pilonidal sinus disease: a consensus from the PITSTOP study. Colorectal Dis 2024. [PMID: 38671581 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
AIM Pilonidal sinus disease is a common condition treated by colorectal surgeons. There is a lack of literature in the field to guide optimal management of this condition. As part of the PITSTOP study, we aimed to identify policy and research priorities to provide direction to the field. METHOD Patients and surgeons were invited to participate. A 'So what, now what' exercise was conducted, informed by data from PITSTOP. This generated statements for research and practice priorities. A three-round online Delphi study was conducted, ranking statements based on policy and research separately. Statements were rated 1 (not important) to 9 (important). Statements that were rated 7-9 by more than 70% of participants were entered into the consensus meeting. Personalized voting feedback was shown between rounds. A face-to-face meeting was held to discuss statements, and participants were asked to rank statements using a weighted choice vote. RESULTS Twenty-two people participated in the focus group, generating 14 research and 19 policy statements. Statements were voted on by 56 participants in round 1, 53 in round 2 and 51 in round 3. A total of 15 policy statements and 19 research statements were discussed in the consensus round. Key policy statements addressed treatment strategies and intensity, surgeon training opportunities, need for classification and the impact of treatment on return to work. Research recommendations included design of future trials, methodology considerations and research questions. CONCLUSION This study has identified research and policy priorities in pilonidal sinus disease which are relevant to patients and clinicians. These should inform practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Lee
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emily B Strong
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Farhat Din
- Academic Coloproctology, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Jon Lund
- Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Morton
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Asha Senapati
- St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Helen Jones
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Steven R Brown
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee MJ, Lee E, Bradburn M, Hind D, Strong EB, Din F, Wysocki AP, Lund J, Moffatt C, Morton J, Senapati A, Jones H, Brown SR. Classification and stratification in pilonidal sinus disease: findings from the PITSTOP cohort. Colorectal Dis 2024. [PMID: 38644667 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
AIM Research in pilonidal disease faces several challenges, one of which is consistent and useful disease classification. The International Pilonidal Society (IPS) proposed a four-part classification in 2017. The aim of this work was to assess the validity and reliability of this tool using data from the PITSTOP cohort study. METHOD Face validity was assessed by mapping the items/domains in the IPS tool against tools identified through a systematic review. Key concepts were defined as those appearing in more than two-thirds of published tools. Concurrent and predictive validity were assessed by comparing key patient-reported outcome measures between groups at baseline and at clinic visit. The outcomes of interest were health utility, Cardiff Wound Impact Questionnaire (CWIQ) and pain score between groups. Significance was set at p = 0.05 a priori. Interrater reliability was assessed using images captured during the PITSTOP cohort. Ninety images were assessed by six raters (two experts, two general surgeons and two trainees), and classified into IPS type. Interrater reliability was assessed using the unweighted kappa and unweighted Gwet's AC1 statistics. RESULTS For face validity items represented in the IPS were common to other classification systems. Concurrent and predictive validity assessment showed differences in health utility and pain between groups at baseline, and for some treatment groups at follow-up. Assessors agreed the same classification in 38% of participants [chance-corrected kappa 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.61), Gwet's AC1 0.63 (95% CI 0.56-0.69)]. CONCLUSION The IPS classification demonstrates key aspects of reliability and validity that would support its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Lee
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emily B Strong
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Farhat Din
- Academic Coloproctology, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Jon Lund
- Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Morton
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Asha Senapati
- St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Helen Jones
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Steven R Brown
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hawkins RL, Zia M, Hind D, Lobo AJ. Inequalities in Healthcare Access, Experience and Outcomes in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae077. [PMID: 38600759 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are incurable diseases that require lifelong access to health services. Accumulating evidence of inequalities in health care access, experience, and outcomes for individuals with IBD is apparent. This review aimed to describe the inequalities in healthcare access, experiences, and outcomes of care for adults with IBD, to identify research gaps, and to identify future research priorities in this area. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to retrieve quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods evidence from 3 databases (EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL) published between January 1, 2000, and September 27, 2023. RESULTS Fifty-one studies met the criteria for inclusion. The majority (42 of 51) focused on IBD health outcomes, followed by healthcare access (24 of 51). Significantly fewer investigated patient experiences of IBD healthcare (8 of 51). Most available studies reported on race/ethnic disparities of healthcare (33 of 51), followed by inequalities driven by socioeconomic differences (12 of 51), rurality (7 of 51), gender and sex (3 of 51), age (2 of 51), culture (2 of 51), literacy (1 of 51), and sexuality (1 of 51). Inflammatory bowel disease patients from Black, Asian, and Hispanic ethnic groups had significantly poorer health outcomes. A lack of research was found in the sexual and gender minority community (1 of 51). No research was found to investigate inequalities in IBD patients with learning disabilities or autism. CONCLUSIONS Further research, particularly utilizing qualitative methods, is needed to understand health experiences of underserved patient populations with IBD. Cultural humility in IBD care is required to better serve individuals with IBD of Black and Asian race/ethnicity. The lack of research amongst sexual and gender minority groups with IBD, and with learning disabilities, poses a risk of creating inequalities within inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Hawkins
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Maryam Zia
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alan J Lobo
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allsopp K, Varese F, French P, Young E, White H, Chung P, Davey J, Hassan AA, Wright SA, Barrett A, Bhutani G, McGuirk K, Shields G, Huntley F, Jordan J, Rowlandson A, Sarsam M, Ten Cate H, Walker H, Watson R, Willbourn J, Hind D. A service mapping exercise of four health and social care staff mental health and wellbeing services, Resilience Hubs, to describe health service provision and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:430. [PMID: 38575960 PMCID: PMC10996192 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10835-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NHS England funded 40 Mental Health and Wellbeing Hubs to support health and social care staff affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to document variations in how national guidance was adapted to the local contexts of four Hubs in the North of England. METHODS We used a modified version of Price's (2019) service mapping methodology. Service level data were used to inform the analysis. A mapping template was adapted from a range of tools, including the European Service Mapping Schedule, and reviewed by Hub leads. Key data included service model; staffing; and interventions. Data were collected between March 2021 - March 2022 by site research assistants. Findings were accuracy-checked by Hub leads, and a logic model developed to theorise how the Hubs may effect change. RESULTS Hub goals and service models closely reflected guidance; offering: proactive outreach; team-based support; clinical assessment; onward referral, and rapid access to mental health support (in-house and external). Implementation reflected a service context of a client group with high mental health need, and high waiting times at external mental health services. Hubs were predominantly staffed by experienced clinicians, to manage these mental health presentations and organisational working. Formulation-based psychological assessment and the provision of direct therapy were not core functions of the NHS England model, however all Hubs incorporated these adaptations into their service models in response to local contexts, such as extensive waiting lists within external services, and/or client presentations falling between gaps in existing service provision. Finally, a standalone clinical records system was seen as important to reassure Hub users of confidentiality. Other more nuanced variation depended on localised contexts. CONCLUSION This study provides a map for setting up services, emphasising early understandings of how new services will integrate within existing systems. Local and regional contexts led to variation in service configuration. Whilst additional Hub functions are supported by available literature, further research is needed to determine whether these functions should comprise essential components of staff wellbeing services moving forward. Future research should also determine the comparative effectiveness of service components, and the limits of permissible variation. STUDY REGISTRATION researchregistry6303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Allsopp
- Complex Trauma & Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Research and Innovation, 3rd Floor Rawnsley Building, Hathersage Road, Manchester, UK.
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
| | - Filippo Varese
- Complex Trauma & Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Research and Innovation, 3rd Floor Rawnsley Building, Hathersage Road, Manchester, UK
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul French
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building, Bonsall Street, Manchester, UK
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, 225 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Ellie Young
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, 225 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Hannah White
- Complex Trauma & Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Research and Innovation, 3rd Floor Rawnsley Building, Hathersage Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Priscilla Chung
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Sceptre Point, Sceptre Way, Walton Summit, Preston, UK
| | - Jessica Davey
- Humber and North Yorkshire Resilience Hub, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, UK
| | - Alysha A Hassan
- Cheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, V7 Building, Kings Business Park, Prescot, UK
| | - Sally-Anne Wright
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Sceptre Point, Sceptre Way, Walton Summit, Preston, UK
| | - Alan Barrett
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, 225 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UK
- School of Health Science, University of Salford, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road Campus, Broad St, Salford, UK
| | - Gita Bhutani
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Sceptre Point, Sceptre Way, Walton Summit, Preston, UK
| | - Katherine McGuirk
- Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, 4th Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place, Manchester, UK
| | - Gemma Shields
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Fay Huntley
- Cheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, V7 Building, Kings Business Park, Prescot, UK
- Doctorate of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Room 2.2, Doorway 6, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanne Jordan
- Humber and North Yorkshire Resilience Hub, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, UK
| | - Aleix Rowlandson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - May Sarsam
- Cheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, V7 Building, Kings Business Park, Prescot, UK
| | - Hein Ten Cate
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Sceptre Point, Sceptre Way, Walton Summit, Preston, UK
| | - Holly Walker
- Humber and North Yorkshire Resilience Hub, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, UK
| | - Ruth Watson
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester, M25 3BL, UK
| | - Jenni Willbourn
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, 225 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, The Innovation Centre, University of Sheffield, 217 Portobello, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sheldon E, Ezaydi N, Ditmore M, Fuseini O, Ainley R, Robinson K, Hind D, Lobo AJ. Patient and public involvement in the development of health services: Engagement of underserved populations in a quality improvement programme for inflammatory bowel disease using a community-based participatory approach. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14004. [PMID: 38433003 PMCID: PMC10909615 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Involving people with lived experience is fundamental to healthcare development and delivery. This is especially true for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) services, where holistic and personalised models of care are becoming increasingly important. There is, however, a significant lack of representation of underserved and diverse groups in IBD research, and there are significant barriers to healthcare access and utilisation among minority groups in IBD. IBD centres need to be aware of these experiences to address barriers via service changes, improve interactions with local communities and promote meaningful engagement for improved health outcomes. METHODS A pragmatic community-based approach was taken to engage with leaders and members of underserved groups across 11 workshops representing Roma, Afro-Caribbean, people of African descent and the wider black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, Muslim women, refugee community members, deprived areas of South Yorkshire, LGBTQ+ and deaf populations. Thematic analysis of field notes identified patterns of attention across the community groups and where improvements to services were most frequently suggested. RESULTS Findings demonstrated several barriers experienced to healthcare access and utilisation, including language accessibility, staff attitudes and awareness, mental health and stigma, continuity of support, and practical factors such as ease of service use and safe spaces. These barriers acted as a lever to co-producing service changes that are responsive to the health and social care needs of these groups. CONCLUSIONS Engaging with people from a range of communities is imperative for ensuring that service improvements in IBD are accessible and representative of individual needs and values. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Local community leaders and members of community groups actively participated in the co-design and development of improvements to the IBD service for a local hospital. Their contributions further informed a pilot process for quality improvement programmes in IBD centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Sheldon
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR)The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Naseeb Ezaydi
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR)The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | | | - Olga Fuseini
- Freelance Interpreter and Roma ConsultantSheffieldUK
| | | | - Kerry Robinson
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR)The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Alan J. Lobo
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lindsay JO, Hind D, Swaby L, Berntsson H, Bradburn M, Bannur C U, Byrne J, Clarke C, Desoysa L, Dickins B, Din S, Emsley R, Foulds GA, Gribben J, Hawkey C, Irving PM, Kazmi M, Lee E, Loban A, Lobo A, Mahida Y, Moran GW, Papaioannou D, Parkes M, Peniket A, Pockley AG, Satsangi J, Subramanian S, Travis S, Turton E, Uttenthal B, Rutella S, Snowden JA. Safety and efficacy of autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with low-dose cyclophosphamide mobilisation and reduced intensity conditioning versus standard of care in refractory Crohn's disease (ASTIClite): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:333-345. [PMID: 38340759 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00460-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A previous controlled trial of autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with refractory Crohn's disease did not meet its primary endpoint and reported high toxicity. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of HSCT with an immune-ablative regimen of reduced intensity versus standard of care in this patient population. METHODS This open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial was conducted in nine National Health Service hospital trusts across the UK. Adults (aged 18-60 years) with active Crohn's disease on endoscopy (Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ulcer sub-score of ≥2) refractory to two or more classes of biological therapy, with no perianal or intra-abdominal sepsis or clinically significant comorbidity, were recruited. Participants were centrally randomly assigned (2:1) to either HSCT with a reduced dose of cyclophosphamide (intervention group) or standard care (control group). Randomisation was stratified by trial site by use of random permuted blocks of size 3 and 6. Patients in the intervention group underwent stem-cell mobilisation (cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 μg/kg) and stem-cell harvest (minimum 2·0 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg), before conditioning (fludarabine 125 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin [thymoglobulin] 7·5 mg/kg in total) and subsequent stem-cell reinfusion supported by G-CSF. Patients in the control group continued any available conventional, biological, or nutritional therapy. The primary outcome was absence of endoscopic ulceration (SES-CD ulcer sub-score of 0) without surgery or death at week 48, analysed in the intention-to-treat population by central reading. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, 17160440. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2018, and Nov 8, 2019, 49 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 23 (47%) were randomly assigned: 13 (57%) to the intervention group and ten (43%) to the control group. In the intervention group, ten (77%) participants underwent HSCT and nine (69%) reached 48-week follow-up; in the control group, nine (90%) reached 48-week follow-up. The trial was halted in response to nine reported suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions in six (46%) patients in the intervention group, including renal failure due to proven thrombotic microangiopathy in three participants and one death due to pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. At week 48, absence of endoscopic ulceration without surgery or death was reported in three (43%) of seven participants in the intervention group and in none of six participants in the control group with available data. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention group (38 in 13 [100%] patients) than in the control group (16 in four [40%] patients). A second patient in the intervention group died after week 48 of respiratory and renal failure. INTERPRETATION Although HSCT with an immune-ablative regimen of reduced intensity decreased endoscopic disease activity, significant adverse events deem this regimen unsuitable for future clinical use in patients with refractory Crohn's disease. FUNDING Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Berntsson
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Uday Bannur C
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jennifer Byrne
- Department of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christopher Clarke
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lauren Desoysa
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben Dickins
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma A Foulds
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Gribben
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Hawkey
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Majid Kazmi
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Amanda Loban
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Lobo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Yashwant Mahida
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gordon W Moran
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Diana Papaioannou
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Peniket
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - A Graham Pockley
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Simon Travis
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emily Turton
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben Uttenthal
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sergio Rutella
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Horner DE, Davis S, Pandor A, Shulver H, Goodacre S, Hind D, Rex S, Gillett M, Bursnall M, Griffin X, Holland M, Hunt BJ, de Wit K, Bennett S, Pierce-Williams R. Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospital inpatients: the VTEAM evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-166. [PMID: 38634415 DOI: 10.3310/awtw6200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pharmacological prophylaxis during hospital admission can reduce the risk of acquired blood clots (venous thromboembolism) but may cause complications, such as bleeding. Using a risk assessment model to predict the risk of blood clots could facilitate selection of patients for prophylaxis and optimise the balance of benefits, risks and costs. Objectives We aimed to identify validated risk assessment models and estimate their prognostic accuracy, evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different strategies for selecting hospitalised patients for prophylaxis, assess the feasibility of using efficient research methods and estimate key parameters for future research. Design We undertook a systematic review, decision-analytic modelling and observational cohort study conducted in accordance with Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) guidelines. Setting NHS hospitals, with primary data collection at four sites. Participants Medical and surgical hospital inpatients, excluding paediatric, critical care and pregnancy-related admissions. Interventions Prophylaxis for all patients, none and according to selected risk assessment models. Main outcome measures Model accuracy for predicting blood clots, lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with alternative strategies, accuracy of efficient methods for identifying key outcomes and proportion of inpatients recommended prophylaxis using different models. Results We identified 24 validated risk assessment models, but low-quality heterogeneous data suggested weak accuracy for prediction of blood clots and generally high risk of bias in all studies. Decision-analytic modelling showed that pharmacological prophylaxis for all eligible is generally more cost-effective than model-based strategies for both medical and surgical inpatients, when valuing a quality-adjusted life-year at £20,000. The findings were more sensitive to uncertainties in the surgical population; strategies using risk assessment models were more cost-effective if the model was assumed to have a very high sensitivity, or the long-term risks of post-thrombotic complications were lower. Efficient methods using routine data did not accurately identify blood clots or bleeding events and several pre-specified feasibility criteria were not met. Theoretical prophylaxis rates across an inpatient cohort based on existing risk assessment models ranged from 13% to 91%. Limitations Existing studies may underestimate the accuracy of risk assessment models, leading to underestimation of their cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness findings do not apply to patients with an increased risk of bleeding. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis options were excluded from the modelling. Primary data collection was predominately retrospective, risking case ascertainment bias. Conclusions Thromboprophylaxis for all patients appears to be generally more cost-effective than using a risk assessment model, in hospitalised patients at low risk of bleeding. To be cost-effective, any risk assessment model would need to be highly sensitive. Current evidence on risk assessment models is at high risk of bias and our findings should be interpreted in this context. We were unable to demonstrate the feasibility of using efficient methods to accurately detect relevant outcomes for future research. Future work Further research should evaluate routine prophylaxis strategies for all eligible hospitalised patients. Models that could accurately identify individuals at very low risk of blood clots (who could discontinue prophylaxis) warrant further evaluation. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020165778 and Researchregistry5216. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127454) and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 20. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Edward Horner
- Emergency Department, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Abdullah Pandor
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Shulver
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steve Goodacre
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Saleema Rex
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael Gillett
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew Bursnall
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Xavier Griffin
- Barts Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mark Holland
- School of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK
| | - Beverley Jane Hunt
- Thrombosis & Haemophilia Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, King's Healthcare Partners, London, UK
| | - Kerstin de Wit
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Shan Bennett
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bamford E, Berntsson H, Beale S, Desoysa L, Dias J, Hamer-Kiwacz S, Hind D, Johnson N, Loban A, Molloy K, Morvan E, Rombach I, Selby A, Thokala P, Turtle C, Walters S, Drummond A. Flexor Injury Rehabilitation Splint Trial (FIRST): protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing three splints for finger flexor tendon repairs. Trials 2024; 25:193. [PMID: 38493121 PMCID: PMC10943783 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08013-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Without surgical repair, flexor tendon injuries do not heal and patients' ability to bend fingers and grip objects is impaired. However, flexor tendon repair surgery also requires optimal rehabilitation. There are currently three custom-made splints used in the rehabilitation of zone I/II flexor tendon repairs, each with different assumed harm/benefit profiles: the dorsal forearm and hand-based splint (long), the Manchester short splint (short), and the relative motion flexion splint (mini). There is, however, no robust evidence as to which splint, if any, is most clinical or cost effective. The Flexor Injury Rehabilitation Splint Trial (FIRST) was designed to address this evidence gap. METHODS FIRST is a parallel group, superiority, analyst-blind, multi-centre, individual participant-randomised controlled trial. Participants will be assigned 1:1:1 to receive either the long, short, or mini splint. We aim to recruit 429 participants undergoing rehabilitation following zone I/II flexor tendon repair surgery. Potential participants will initially be identified prior to surgery, in NHS hand clinics across the UK, and consented and randomised at their splint fitting appointment post-surgery. The primary outcome will be the mean post-randomisation score on the patient-reported wrist and hand evaluation measure (PRWHE), assessed at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures include blinded grip strength and active range of movement (AROM) assessments, adverse events, adherence to the splinting protocol (measured via temperature sensors inserted into the splints), quality of life assessment, and further patient-reported outcomes. An economic evaluation will assess the cost-effectiveness of each splint, and a qualitative sub-study will evaluate participants' preferences for, and experiences of wearing, the splints. Furthermore, a mediation analysis will determine the relationship between patient preferences, splint adherence, and splint effectiveness. DISCUSSION FIRST will compare the three splints with respect to clinical efficacy, complications, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. FIRST is a pragmatic trial which will recruit from 26 NHS sites to allow findings to be generalisable to current clinical practice in the UK. It will also provide significant insights into patient experiences of splint wear and how adherence to splinting may impact outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: 10236011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Bamford
- Pulvertaft Hand Centre, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Hannah Berntsson
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Suzanne Beale
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, B15 2GW, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lauren Desoysa
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Joseph Dias
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, LE1, 7RH, Leicester, UK
| | - Sienna Hamer-Kiwacz
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nick Johnson
- Pulvertaft Hand Centre, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Amanda Loban
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Emma Morvan
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ines Rombach
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna Selby
- Pulvertaft Hand Centre, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Praveen Thokala
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chris Turtle
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stephen Walters
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK
| | - Avril Drummond
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2QL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ridsdale K, Khurana K, Taslim AT, Robinson JK, Solanke F, Tung WS, Sheldon E, Hind D, Lobo AJ. Quality improvement exercises in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) services: A scoping review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298374. [PMID: 38451904 PMCID: PMC10919633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quality Improvement initiatives aim to improve care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). These address a range of aspects of care including adherence to published guidelines. The objectives of this review were to document the scope and quality of published quality improvement initiatives in IBD, highlight successful interventions and the outcomes achieved. DESIGN/METHOD We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. We included peer reviewed articles or conference proceedings reporting initiatives intended to improve the quality of IBD care, with both baseline and prospectively collected follow-up data. Initiatives were categorised based on problems, interventions and outcomes. We used the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set instrument to appraise articles. We mapped the focus of the articles to the six domains of the IBD standards. RESULTS 100 studies were identified (35 full text; 65 conference abstracts). Many focused on vaccination, medication, screening, or meeting multiple quality measures. Common interventions included provider education, the development of new service protocols, or enhancements to the electronic medical records. Studies principally focused on areas covered by the IBD standards 'ongoing care' and 'the IBD service', with less focus on standards 'pre-diagnosis', 'newly diagnosed', 'flare management', 'surgery' or 'inpatient care'. CONCLUSION Good quality evidence exists on approaches to improve the quality of a narrow range of IBD service functions, but there are many topic areas with little or no published quality improvement initiatives. We highlight successful quality improvement interventions and offer recommendations to improve reporting of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Ridsdale
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Kajal Khurana
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Faith Solanke
- Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Shao Tung
- Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Sheldon
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alan J. Lobo
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fox MN, Dickson JM, Burch P, Hind D, Hawksworth L. Delivering relational continuity of care in UK general practice: a scoping review. BJGP Open 2024:BJGPO.2024.0041. [PMID: 38438196 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2024.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relational continuity of care (patients seeing the same GP) is associated with better outcomes for patients, but it has been declining in general practice in the UK. AIM To understand what interventions have been tried to improve relational continuity of care in general practice in the UK. DESIGN & SETTING Scoping review METHOD: An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus from 2002 to the present day was undertaken. Sources of grey literature were also searched. Studies that detailed service-level methods of achieving relational continuity of care with a GP in the UK were eligible for inclusion. Interventions were described narratively in relation to the elements listed in the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). A logic model describing the rationale behind interventions was constructed. RESULTS 17 unique interventions were identified. The interventions used a wide variety of strategies to try to improve relational continuity. This included personal lists, amended booking processes, regular reviews, digital technology, facilitated follow ups, altered appointment times, and use of acute hubs. 12 of the interventions targeted specific patient groups for increased continuity whilst others focused on increasing continuity for all patients. Changes in continuity levels were measured inconsistently using several different methods. CONCLUSION Several different strategies have been used in UK general practices in an attempt to improve relational continuity of care. Whilst there is a similar underlying logic to these interventions, their scope, aims and methods vary considerably. Furthermore, due to a weak evidence base, comparing their efficacy remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miglena Nikolaeva Fox
- University of Sheffield, Centre for Health and Related Research Peak Edge PCN and SY ICB Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Jon M Dickson
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Burch
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Liv Hawksworth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brown SR, Hind D, Strong E, Bradburn M, Din F, Lee E, Lund J, Moffatt C, Morton J, Senapati A, Jones H, Lee MJ. Real-world practice and outcomes in pilonidal surgery: Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Studying The Options (PITSTOP) cohort. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae009. [PMID: 38488204 PMCID: PMC10941257 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous surgical approaches exist for the treatment of pilonidal disease. Current literature on treatment is of poor quality, limiting the ability to define optimal intervention. The aim of this study was to provide real-world data on current surgical practice and report patient and risk-adjusted outcomes, informing future trial design. METHODS This UK-wide multicentre prospective cohort study, including patients (aged over 16 years) who had definitive treatment for symptomatic pilonidal disease, was conducted between May 2019 and March 2022. Patient and disease characteristics, and intervention details were analysed. Data on patient-reported outcomes, including pain, complications, treatment failure, wound issues, and quality of life, were gathered at various time points up to 6 months after surgery. Strategies were implemented to adjust for risk influencing different treatment choices and outcomes. RESULTS Of the 667 participants consenting, 574 (86.1%) were followed up to the study end. Twelve interventions were observed. Broadly, 59.5% underwent major excisional surgery and 40.5% minimally invasive surgery. Complications occurred in 45.1% of the cohort. Those who had minimally invasive procedures had better quality of life and, after risk adjustment, less pain (score on day 1: mean difference 1.58, 95% c.i. 1.14 to 2.01), fewer complications (difference 17.5 (95% c.i. 9.1 to 25.9)%), more rapid return to normal activities (mean difference 25.9 (18.4 to 33.4) days) but a rate of higher treatment failure (difference 9.6 (95% c.i. 17.3 to 1.9)%). At study end, 25% reported an unhealed wound and 10% had not returned to normal activities. CONCLUSION The burden after surgery for pilonidal disease is high and treatment failure is common. Minimally invasive techniques may improve outcomes at the expense of a 10% higher risk of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven R Brown
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emily Strong
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Farhat Din
- Academic Coloproctology, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jon Lund
- Department of Surgery, Derby Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | - Christine Moffatt
- Institute of Care Excellence, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jonathan Morton
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Asha Senapati
- Department of Surgery, St Mark’s Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Helen Jones
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew J Lee
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goodacre S, Sutton L, Ennis K, Thomas B, Hawksworth O, Iftikhar K, Croft SJ, Fuller G, Waterhouse S, Hind D, Stevenson M, Bradburn MJ, Smyth M, Perkins GD, Millins M, Rosser A, Dickson J, Wilson M. Prehospital early warning scores for adults with suspected sepsis: the PHEWS observational cohort and decision-analytic modelling study. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-93. [PMID: 38551135 PMCID: PMC11017155 DOI: 10.3310/ndty2403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines for sepsis recommend treating those at highest risk within 1 hour. The emergency care system can only achieve this if sepsis is recognised and prioritised. Ambulance services can use prehospital early warning scores alongside paramedic diagnostic impression to prioritise patients for treatment or early assessment in the emergency department. Objectives To determine the accuracy, impact and cost-effectiveness of using early warning scores alongside paramedic diagnostic impression to identify sepsis requiring urgent treatment. Design Retrospective diagnostic cohort study and decision-analytic modelling of operational consequences and cost-effectiveness. Setting Two ambulance services and four acute hospitals in England. Participants Adults transported to hospital by emergency ambulance, excluding episodes with injury, mental health problems, cardiac arrest, direct transfer to specialist services, or no vital signs recorded. Interventions Twenty-one early warning scores used alongside paramedic diagnostic impression, categorised as sepsis, infection, non-specific presentation, or other specific presentation. Main outcome measures Proportion of cases prioritised at the four hospitals; diagnostic accuracy for the sepsis-3 definition of sepsis and receiving urgent treatment (primary reference standard); daily number of cases with and without sepsis prioritised at a large and a small hospital; the minimum treatment effect associated with prioritisation at which each strategy would be cost-effective, compared to no prioritisation, assuming willingness to pay £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Results Data from 95,022 episodes involving 71,204 patients across four hospitals showed that most early warning scores operating at their pre-specified thresholds would prioritise more than 10% of cases when applied to non-specific attendances or all attendances. Data from 12,870 episodes at one hospital identified 348 (2.7%) with the primary reference standard. The National Early Warning Score, version 2 (NEWS2), had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when applied only to patients with a paramedic diagnostic impression of sepsis or infection (0.756, 95% confidence interval 0.729 to 0.783) or sepsis alone (0.655, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.68). None of the strategies provided high sensitivity (> 0.8) with acceptable positive predictive value (> 0.15). NEWS2 provided combinations of sensitivity and specificity that were similar or superior to all other early warning scores. Applying NEWS2 to paramedic diagnostic impression of sepsis or infection with thresholds of > 4, > 6 and > 8 respectively provided sensitivities and positive predictive values (95% confidence interval) of 0.522 (0.469 to 0.574) and 0.216 (0.189 to 0.245), 0.447 (0.395 to 0.499) and 0.274 (0.239 to 0.313), and 0.314 (0.268 to 0.365) and 0.333 (confidence interval 0.284 to 0.386). The mortality relative risk reduction from prioritisation at which each strategy would be cost-effective exceeded 0.975 for all strategies analysed. Limitations We estimated accuracy using a sample of older patients at one hospital. Reliable evidence was not available to estimate the effectiveness of prioritisation in the decision-analytic modelling. Conclusions No strategy is ideal but using NEWS2, in patients with a paramedic diagnostic impression of infection or sepsis could identify one-third to half of sepsis cases without prioritising unmanageable numbers. No other score provided clearly superior accuracy to NEWS2. Research is needed to develop better definition, diagnosis and treatments for sepsis. Study registration This study is registered as Research Registry (reference: researchregistry5268). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/136/10) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 16. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Goodacre
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Laura Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate Ennis
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben Thomas
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Olivia Hawksworth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Susan J Croft
- Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gordon Fuller
- Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon Waterhouse
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matt Stevenson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike J Bradburn
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael Smyth
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Gavin D Perkins
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Mark Millins
- Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Andy Rosser
- West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust, Midlands, UK
| | - Jon Dickson
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew Wilson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hind D, Wheelband KR, Brown SR, Lee MJ. Pilonidal sinus disease: a brief guide for primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2024; 74:44-45. [PMID: 38154940 PMCID: PMC10755991 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp24x736113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hind
- Section of Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | | | - Steven R Brown
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield
| | - Matthew J Lee
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield; Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Swaby L, Perry DC, Walker K, Hind D, Mills A, Jayasuriya R, Totton N, Desoysa L, Chatters R, Young B, Sherratt F, Latimer N, Keetharuth A, Kenison L, Walters S, Gardner A, Ahuja S, Campbell L, Greenwood S, Cole A. Bracing Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (BASIS) study - night-time versus full-time bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Bone Jt Open 2023; 4:873-880. [PMID: 37972634 PMCID: PMC10655615 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.411.bjo-2023-0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of 'full-time bracing' versus 'night-time bracing' in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods UK paediatric spine clinics will recruit 780 participants aged ten to 15 years-old with AIS, Risser stage 0, 1, or 2, and curve size (Cobb angle) 20° to 40° with apex at or below T7. Patients are randomly allocated 1:1, to either full-time or night-time bracing. A qualitative sub-study will explore communication and experiences of families in terms of bracing and research. Patient and Public Involvement & Engagement informed study design and will assist with aspects of trial delivery and dissemination. Discussion The primary outcome is 'treatment failure' (Cobb angle progression to 50° or more before skeletal maturity); skeletal maturity is at Risser stage 4 in females and 5 in males, or 'treatment success' (Cobb angle less than 50° at skeletal maturity). The comparison is on a non-inferiority basis (non-inferiority margin 11%). Participants are followed up every six months while in brace, and at one and two years after skeletal maturity. Secondary outcomes include the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire and measures of quality of life, psychological effects of bracing, adherence, anxiety and depression, sleep, satisfaction, and educational attainment. All data will be collected through the British Spine Registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizzie Swaby
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel C. Perry
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kerry Walker
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Nikki Totton
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lauren Desoysa
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robin Chatters
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Frances Sherratt
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nick Latimer
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Stephen Walters
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Adrian Gardner
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sashin Ahuja
- Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Laura Campbell
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | - Ashley Cole
- Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - on behalf of the BASIS study group
- SCHARR, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Evelina London Children’s Hospital, London, UK
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Aston University, Birmingham, UK
- Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Keele University, Keele, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Goodacre S, Sutton L, Thomas B, Hawksworth O, Iftikhar K, Croft S, Fuller G, Waterhouse S, Hind D, Bradburn M, Smyth MA, Perkins GD, Millins M, Rosser A, Dickson JM, Wilson MJ. Prehospital early warning scores for adults with suspected sepsis: retrospective diagnostic cohort study. Emerg Med J 2023; 40:768-776. [PMID: 37673643 PMCID: PMC10646863 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ambulance services need to identify and prioritise patients with sepsis for early hospital assessment. We aimed to determine the accuracy of early warning scores alongside paramedic diagnostic impression to identify sepsis that required urgent treatment. METHODS We undertook a retrospective diagnostic cohort study involving adult emergency medical cases transported to Sheffield Teaching Hospitals ED by Yorkshire Ambulance Service in 2019. We used routine ambulance service data to calculate 21 early warning scores and categorise paramedic diagnostic impressions as sepsis, infection, non-specific presentation or other presentation. We linked cases to hospital records and identified those meeting the sepsis-3 definition who received urgent hospital treatment for sepsis (reference standard). Analysis determined the accuracy of strategies that combined early warning scores at varying thresholds for positivity with paramedic diagnostic impression. RESULTS We linked 12 870/24 955 (51.6%) cases and identified 348/12 870 (2.7%) with a positive reference standard. None of the strategies provided sensitivity greater than 0.80 with positive predictive value greater than 0.15. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the National Early Warning Score, version 2 (NEWS2) applied to patients with a diagnostic impression of sepsis or infection was 0.756 (95% CI 0.729, 0.783). No other early warning score provided clearly superior accuracy to NEWS2. Paramedic impression of sepsis or infection had sensitivity of 0.572 (0.519, 0.623) and positive predictive value of 0.156 (0.137, 0.176). NEWS2 thresholds of >4, >6 and >8 applied to patients with a diagnostic impression of sepsis or infection, respectively, provided sensitivities and positive predictive values of 0.522 (0.469, 0.574) and 0.216 (0.189, 0.245), 0.447 (0.395, 0.499) and 0.274 (0.239, 0.313), and 0.314 (0.268, 0.365) and 0.333 (0.284, 0.386). CONCLUSION No strategy is ideal but using NEWS2 alongside paramedic diagnostic impression of infection or sepsis could identify one-third to half of sepsis cases without prioritising unmanageable numbers. No other score provided clearly superior accuracy to NEWS2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER researchregistry5268, https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry%23home/registrationdetails/5de7bbd97ca5b50015041c33/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Goodacre
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Laura Sutton
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben Thomas
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Olivia Hawksworth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Susan Croft
- Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gordon Fuller
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon Waterhouse
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Mark Millins
- Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Andy Rosser
- West Midlands Ambulance Service, West Midlands, UK
| | - Jon M Dickson
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew Joseph Wilson
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Allsopp K, Varese F, French P, White H, Chung P, Hassan AA, Wright SA, Young E, Barrett A, Bhutani G, McGuirk K, Huntley F, Sarsam M, Ten Cate H, Watson R, Willbourn J, Hind D. Implementing psychological support for health and social care staff affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative exploration of staff well-being hubs ('Resilience Hubs') using normalisation process theory. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071826. [PMID: 37612138 PMCID: PMC10450134 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate the implementation of Hubs providing access to psychological support for health and social care keyworkers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Qualitative interviews informed by normalisation process theory to understand how the Hub model became embedded into normal practice, and factors that disrupted normalisation of this approach. SETTING Three Resilience Hubs in the North of England. PARTICIPANTS Hub staff, keyworkers who accessed Hub support (Hub clients), keyworkers who had not accessed a Hub, and wider stakeholders involved in the provision of staff support within the health and care system (N=63). RESULTS Hubs were generally seen as an effective way of supporting keyworkers, and Hub clients typically described very positive experiences. Flexibility and adaptability to local needs were strongly valued. Keyworkers accessed support when they understood the offer, valuing a confidential service that was separate from their organisation. Confusion about how Hubs differed from other support prevented some from enrolling. Beliefs about job roles, unsupportive managers, negative workplace cultures and systemic issues prevented keyworkers from valuing mental health support. Lack of support from managers discouraged keyworker engagement with Hubs. Black, Asian and minority ethnic keyworkers impacted by racism felt that the Hubs did not always meet their needs. CONCLUSIONS Hubs were seen as a valuable, responsive and distinct part of the health and care system. Findings highlight the importance of improving promotion and accessibility of Hubs, and continuation of confidential Hub support. Policy implications for the wider health and care sector include the central importance of genuine promotion of and value placed on mental health support by health and social care management, and the creation of psychologically safe work environments. Diversity and cultural competency training is needed to better reach under-represented communities. Findings are consistent with the international literature, therefore, likely to have applicability outside of the current context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Allsopp
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Filippo Varese
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul French
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - Hannah White
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Priscilla Chung
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Alysha A Hassan
- Cheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sally-Anne Wright
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Ellie Young
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - Alan Barrett
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Gita Bhutani
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Katherine McGuirk
- Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, Manchester, UK
| | - Fay Huntley
- Cheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Doctorate of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - May Sarsam
- Cheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hein Ten Cate
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Ruth Watson
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jenni Willbourn
- Greater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schofield LM, Singh SJ, Yousaf Z, Wild JM, Hind D. Personalising airway clearance in chronic suppurative lung diseases: a scoping review. ERJ Open Res 2023; 9:00010-2023. [PMID: 37342087 PMCID: PMC10277870 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00010-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Personalised airway clearance techniques are commonly recommended to augment mucus clearance in chronic suppurative lung diseases. It is unclear what current literature tells us about how airway clearance regimens should be personalised. This scoping review explores current research on airway clearance technique in chronic suppurative lung diseases, to establish the extent and type of guidance in this area, identify knowledge gaps and determine the factors which physiotherapists should consider when personalising airway clearance regimens. Methods Systematic searching of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, Cochrane, Web of Science) was used to identify full-text publications in the last 25 years that described methods of personalising airway clearance techniques in chronic suppurative lung diseases. Items from the TIDieR framework provided a priori categories which were modified based on the initial data to develop a "Best-fit" framework for data charting. The findings were subsequently transformed into a personalisation model. Results A broad range of publications were identified, most commonly general review papers (44%). The items identified were grouped into seven personalisation factors: physical, psychosocial, airway clearance technique (ACT) type, procedures, dosage, response and provider. As only two divergent models of ACT personalisation were found, the personalisation factors identified were then used to develop a model for physiotherapists. Conclusions The personalisation of airway clearance regimens is widely discussed in the current literature, which provides a range of factors that should be considered. This review summarises the current literature, organising findings into a proposed airway clearance personalisation model, to provide clarity in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne M. Schofield
- Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, IICD, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Paediatric Physiotherapy, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J. Singh
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Zarah Yousaf
- Patient and Public Involvement Member, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Jim M Wild
- Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, IICD, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wickramasekera N, Strong E, Shackley P, Callaghan T, Lee M, Hind D, Brown S. Patient preferences for pilonidal sinus treatments: a discrete choice experiment survey. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:984-994. [PMID: 36636796 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A range of treatments are available for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), each of which has a different risk/benefit profile. The aim of this study was to collect patient views on which interventions they would rather avoid and which outcomes they most value for PSD. METHOD We conducted an online survey using the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method. DCE task involved participants choosing the best treatment option when presented with a set of competing hypothetical treatment profiles. Participants with symptomatic PSD, referred for elective surgery were recruited from 33 NHS trusts between 2020 and 2022. Collected DCE data were analysed using regression analyses. RESULTS One hundred and eleven participants completed the survey. In the overall group, low risk of infection/persistence was the most important characteristic when making a treatment decision (attribute importance score of 70%), followed by treatments with shorter recovery time with an attribute importance score of 30%. The results demonstrated that patients are willing to accept trade-offs between treatment recovery time and risk of infection/persistence. Patients above 30 years old are willing to accept a higher chance of treatment failure in exchange for rapid treatment recovery (risk tolerance between 22.35 - 34.67 percentage points). Conversely, patients in the younger age groups, were risk averse, and were only willing to accept a small risk 1.51-2.15 in exchange for a treatment with faster recovery time. All patient groups appear to the reject the excision and leave open technique due to the need for protracted nursing care. CONCLUSION This study highlights the need for shared decision making when it comes to surgery for PSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Strong
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Tia Callaghan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steven Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of General Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lamidi S, Coe PO, Bordeianou LG, Hart AL, Hind D, Lindsay JO, Lobo AJ, Myrelid P, Raine T, Sebastian S, Fearnhead NS, Lee MJ, Adams K, Almer S, Ananthakrishnan A, Bethune RM, Block M, Brown SR, Cirocco WC, Cooney R, Davies RJ, Atici SD, Dhar A, Din S, Drobne D, Espin‐Basany E, Evans JP, Fleshner PR, Folkesson J, Fraser A, Graf W, Hahnloser D, Hager J, Hancock L, Hanzel J, Hargest R, Hedin CRH, Hill J, Ihle C, Jongen J, Kader R, Karmiris K, Katsanos KH, Keller DS, Kopylov U, Koutrabakis IE, Lamb CA, Landerholm K, Lee GC, Litta F, Limdi JK, Lopes EW, Madoff RD, Martin ST, Martin‐Perez B, Michalopoulos G, Millan M, Münch A, Nakov R, Noor NM, Oresland T, Paquette IM, Pellino G, Perra T, Porcu A, Roslani AC, Samaan MA, Sebepos‐Rogers GM, Segal JP, de Silva SD, Söderholm AM, Spinelli A, Speight RA, Steinhagen RM, Stenström P, Tsimogiannis KE, Varma MG, Verma AM, Verstockt B, Warden C, Yassin NA, Zawadzki A, Carr P, Devlin B, Avery MSP, Gecse KB, Goren I, Hellström PM, Kotze PG, McWhirter D, Naik AS, Sammour T, Selinger CP, Stein SL, Torres J, Wexner SD, Younge LC. Development of a core descriptor set for Crohn's anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 2022; 25:695-706. [PMID: 36461766 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
AIM Crohn's anal fistula (CAF) is a complex condition, with no agreement on which patient characteristics should be routinely reported in studies. The aim of this study was to develop a core descriptor set of key patient characteristics for reporting in all CAF research. METHOD Candidate descriptors were generated from published literature and stakeholder suggestions. Colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists and specialist nurses in inflammatory bowel disease took part in three rounds of an international modified Delphi process using nine-point Likert scales to rank the importance of descriptors. Feedback was provided between rounds to allow refinement of the next ratings. Patterns in descriptor voting were assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA groups were used to organize items in rounds two and three. Consensus descriptors were submitted to a patient panel for feedback. Items meeting predetermined thresholds were included in the final set and ratified at the consensus meeting. RESULTS One hundred and thirty three respondents from 22 countries completed round one, of whom 67.0% completed round three. Ninety seven descriptors were rated across three rounds in 11 PCA-based groups. Forty descriptors were shortlisted. The consensus meeting ratified a core descriptor set of 37 descriptors within six domains: fistula anatomy, current disease activity and phenotype, risk factors, medical interventions for CAF, surgical interventions for CAF, and patient symptoms and impact on quality of life. CONCLUSION The core descriptor set proposed for all future CAF research reflects characteristics important to gastroenterologists and surgeons. This might aid transparent reporting in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sheldon EM, Lillington G, Simpson K, Gibson K, Chambers L, D'Afflitto M, Greig N, Stearn T, Hind D, Ainley R, Winsor G, Ridsdale K, Totton N, Lobo A. Development of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM): A patient-led consensus work and 'think aloud' study for a quality improvement programme. Health Expect 2022; 26:213-225. [PMID: 36335578 PMCID: PMC9854292 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are key in improving healthcare quality, but no PREM exists for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to co-produce a PREM with IBD service users for IBD service evaluation and quality improvement programme. METHODS A pool of 75 items was drawn from published survey instruments covering interactions with services and aspects of living with IBD. In Stage 1, during two workshops, eight expert service users reduced candidate items through a ranked-choice voting exercise and suggested further items. During Stage 2, 18 previously uninvolved people with IBD assessed the face and content validity of the candidate items in 'Think Aloud' interviews. During two final workshops (Stage 3), the expert service users removed, modified and added items based on the interview findings to produce a final version of the PREM. RESULTS Stage 1 generated a draft working PREM mapped to the following four domains: Patient-Centred Care; Quality; Accessibility; Communication and Involvement. The PREM included a set of nine items created by the expert group which shifted the emphasis from 'self-management' to 'living with IBD'. Stage 2 interviews showed that comprehension of the PREM was very good, although there were concerns about the wording, IBD-relevance and ambiguity of some items. During the final two workshops in Stage 3, the expert service users removed 7 items, modified 15 items and added seven new ones based on the interview findings, resulting in a 38-item PREM. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates how extensive service user involvement can inform PREM development. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients were involved as active members of the research team and as research participants to co-produce and validate a PREM for IBD services. In Stage 1, eight expert service users ('the expert group') reduced candidate items for the PREM through a voting exercise and suggested new items. During Stage 2, 18 previously uninvolved people with IBD (the 'think aloud' participants) assessed the validity of the candidate items in 'Think Aloud' interviews as research participants. In Stage 3, the expert group removed, changed and added items based on the interview findings to produce a final version of the 38-item PREM. This study shows how service user involvement can meaningfully inform PREM development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena M. Sheldon
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - George Lillington
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Kati Simpson
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Kirsty Gibson
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Lucy Chambers
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | | | - Nancy Greig
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Theresa Stearn
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | | | | | - Katie Ridsdale
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Nikki Totton
- Sheffield Health and Related ResearchThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Alan Lobo
- Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Coates E, Wickramasekera N, Barr A, Shackley P, Lee M, Hind D, Probert C, Sebastian S, Totton N, Blackwell S, Bedford H, Dames N, Lobo A. Patient preferences and current practice for adults with steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: POPSTER mixed-methods study. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-118. [DOI: 10.3310/rhxr5192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Corticosteroids are a mainstay of the treatment of moderately severe relapses of ulcerative colitis, yet almost 50% of patients do not respond fully to these and risk prolonged steroid use and side effects. There is a lack of clarity about the definitions of steroid resistance, the optimum choice of treatment, and patient and health-care professional treatment preferences.
Objectives
The overall aim of this research was to understand how steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis is managed in adult secondary care and how current practice compares with patient and health-care professional preferences.
Design
A mixed-methods study, including an online survey, qualitative interviews and discrete choice experiments.
Setting
NHS inflammatory bowel disease services in the UK.
Participants
Adults with ulcerative colitis and health-care professionals treating inflammatory bowel disease.
Results
We carried out a survey of health-care professionals (n = 168), qualitative interviews with health-care professionals (n = 20) and patients (n = 33), discrete choice experiments with health-care professionals (n = 116) and patients (n = 115), and a multistakeholder workshop (n = 9). The interviews with and survey of health-care professionals showed that most health-care professionals define steroid resistance as an incomplete response to 40 mg per day of prednisolone after 2 weeks. The survey also found that anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs (particularly infliximab) are the most frequently offered drugs across most steroid-resistant (and steroid-dependent) patient scenarios, but they are less frequently offered to thiopurine-naive patients. Patient interviews identified several factors influencing their treatment choices, including effectiveness of treatment, recommendations from health-care professionals, route of administration and side effects. Over time, depending on the severity and duration of symptoms and, crucially, as medical treatment options become exhausted, patients are willing to try alternative treatments and, eventually, to undergo surgery. The discrete choice experiments found that the probability of remission and of side effects strongly influences the treatment choices of both patients and health-care professionals. Patients are less likely to choose a treatment that takes longer to improve symptoms. Health-care professionals are willing to make difficult compromises by tolerating greater safety risks in exchange for therapeutic benefits. The treatments ranked most positively by patients were infliximab and tofacitinib (each preferred by 38% of patients), and the predicted probability of uptake by health-care professionals was greatest for infliximab (62%).
Limitations
The survey and the discrete choice experiments with patients and health-care professionals are limited by their relatively small sample sizes. The qualitative studies are subject to selection bias. The timing of the different substudies, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, is a potential limitation.
Conclusions
We have identified factors influencing treatment decisions for steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis and the characteristics to consider when choosing treatments to evaluate in future randomised controlled trials. The findings may be used to improve discussions between patients and health-care professionals when they review treatment options for steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis.
Future work
This research highlights the need for consensus work to establish an agreed definition of steroid resistance in ulcerative colitis and a greater understanding of the optimal use of tofacitinib and surgery for this patient group. A randomised controlled trial comparing infliximab with tofacitinib is also recommended.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 41. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Coates
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Amy Barr
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Phil Shackley
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew Lee
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christopher Probert
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Nikki Totton
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | - Alan Lobo
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bursnall M, Thomas BD, Berntsson H, Strong E, Brayne M, Hind D. Clinician and Patient Experience of Internet-Mediated Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Therapy. J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health 2022; 9:251-262. [PMID: 35136713 PMCID: PMC8812350 DOI: 10.1007/s40737-022-00260-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Many eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapists moved their practice online during COVID-19. We conducted surveys and interviews to understand the implementation and acceptability of online EMDR therapy. From 17 June to 2nd August 2021 an online survey was open to EMDR therapists from the EMDR Association UK & Ireland and EMDR International Association email lists, and, through them, their clients. Questions related to determinants of implementation (for therapists) and acceptability (for clients) of online EMDR. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of therapist respondents to provide a deeper understanding of survey responses. Survey responses were received from therapists (n = 562) from five continents, and their clients (n = 148). 88% of clients responded as being extremely or very comfortable receiving EMDR therapy online. At the initial point of ‘social distancing’, 54% of therapists indicated strong or partial reluctance to deliver online EMDR therapy compared to 11% just over one year later. Four fifths of therapists intended to continue offering online therapy after restrictions were lifted. Free-text responses and interview data showed that deprivation and clinical severity could lead to exclusion from online EMDR. Internet connectivity could disrupt sessions, lead to cancellations, or affect the therapy process. Therapists benefited from training in online working. Online EMDR is generally acceptable to therapists and clients, with reservations about digital exclusion, case severity, poor internet connectivity and the need for training. Further research is needed to confirm that online EMDR is clinically non-inferior to in-person working.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Bursnall
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Benjamin D. Thomas
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Hannah Berntsson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lamidi S, Williams KM, Hind D, Peckham-Cooper A, Miller AS, Smith AM, Saha A, Macutkiewicz C, Griffiths EA, Catena F, Coccolini F, Toogood G, Tierney GM, Boyd-Carson H, Sartelli M, Blencowe NS, Lockwood S, Coe PO, Lee MJ, Barreto SG, Drake T, Gachabayov M, Hill J, Ioannidis O, Lostoridis E, Mehraj A, Negoi I, Pata F, Steenkamp C, Ahmed S, Alin V, Al-Rashedy M, Atici SD, Bains L, Bandyopadhyay SK, Baraket O, Bates T, Beral D, Brown L, Buonomo L, Burke D, Caravaglios G, Ceresoli M, Chapman SJ, Cillara N, Clarke R, Colak E, Daniels S, Demetrashvili Z, Di Carlo I, Duff S, Dziakova J, Elliott JA, El Zalabany T, Engledow A, Ewnte B, Fraga GP, George R, Giuffrida M, Glasbey J, Isik A, Kechagias A, Kenington C, Kessel B, Khokha V, Kong V, Laloë P, Litvin A, Lostoridis E, Marinis A, Martínez-Pérez A, Menzies D, Mills R, Monzon BI, Morgan R, Neri V, Nita GE, Perra T, Perrone G, Porcu A, Poskus T, Premnath S, Sall I, Sarma DR, Slavchev M, Spence G, Tarasconi A, Tolonen M, Toro A, Venn ML, Vimalachandran D, Wheldon L, Zakaria AD. Defining core patient descriptors for perforated peptic ulcer research: international Delphi. Br J Surg 2022; 109:603-609. [PMID: 35467718 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains a common condition globally with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous work has demonstrated variation in reporting of patient characteristics in PPU studies, making comparison of studies and outcomes difficult. The aim of this study was to standardize the reporting of patient characteristics, by creating a core descriptor set (CDS) of important descriptors that should be consistently reported in PPU research. METHODS Candidate descriptors were identified through systematic review and stakeholder proposals. An international Delphi exercise involving three survey rounds was undertaken to obtain consensus on key patient characteristics for future research. Participants rated items on a scale of 1-9 with respect to their importance. Items meeting a predetermined threshold (rated 7-9 by over 70 per cent of stakeholders) were included in the final set and ratified at a consensus meeting. Feedback was provided between rounds to allow refinement of ratings. RESULTS Some 116 clinicians were recruited from 29 countries. A total of 63 descriptors were longlisted from the literature, and 27 were proposed by stakeholders. After three survey rounds and a consensus meeting, 27 descriptors were included in the CDS. These covered demographic variables and co-morbidities, risk factors for PPU, presentation and pathway factors, need for organ support, biochemical parameters, prognostic tools, perforation details, and surgical history. CONCLUSION This study defines the core descriptive items for PPU research, which will allow more robust synthesis of studies.
Collapse
|
25
|
Brown S, Girling C, Thapa Magar H, Chaudry A, Bhatti B, Sayers A, Hind D. Guidelines, guidelines and more guidelines for haemorrhoid treatment: A review to sort the wheat from the chaff. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:764-772. [PMID: 35119707 PMCID: PMC9310584 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM Guidelines benefit patients and clinicians by distilling evidence into easy-to-read recommendations. The literature around the management of haemorrhoids is immense and guidelines are invaluable to improve treatment integrity and patient outcomes. We identified current haemorrhoid guidelines and assessed them for quality and consistency. METHODS A systematic search of the literature from January 2011 to October 2021 was carried out. Guidelines identified were assessed for quality using the AGREE II instrument and for consistency in terms of tabulated treatment recommendations. RESULTS During this period nine guidelines were identified worldwide. The general quality was poor with only one guideline considered of high enough quality for use. In general, expert selection criteria for guideline development groups were vaguely defined. There were inconsistencies in the interpretation of the published evidence leading to variation in treatment recommendations. DISCUSSION Fewer, higher quality guidelines, with more consistent results, are needed. Particular attention should be given to defining the selection of experts involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Brown
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Carla Girling
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | | | - Adeeb Chaudry
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Brian Bhatti
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Adele Sayers
- NHS Foundation TrustSheffield Teaching HospitalSheffieldUK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Girling C, Packham A, Robinson L, Arden MA, Hind D, Wildman MJ. Implementing the use of objective medication adherence data in routine clinical practice via the digital CFHealthHub platform: situation analysis and strategy development using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:12. [PMID: 35135620 PMCID: PMC8822811 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00263-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preventative inhaled treatments preserve lung function and reduce exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF). Self-reported adherence to these treatments is over-estimated. An online platform (CFHealthHub) has been developed with patients and clinicians to display real-time objective adherence data from dose-counting nebulisers, so that clinical teams can offer informed treatment support. Methods In this paper, we identify pre-implementation barriers to healthcare practitioners performing two key behaviours: accessing objective adherence data through the website CFHealthHub and discussing medication adherence with patients. We aimed to understand barriers during the pre-implementation phase, so that appropriate strategy could be developed for the scale up of implementing objective adherence data in 19 CF centres. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare practitioners working in three UK CF centres. Qualitative data were coded using the theoretical domains framework (TDF), which describes 14 validated domains to implementation behaviour change. Results Analysis indicated that an implementation strategy should address all 14 domains of the TDF to successfully support implementation. Participants did not report routines or habits for using objective adherence data in clinical care. Examples of salient barriers included skills, beliefs in consequences, and social influence and professional roles. The results also affirmed a requirement to address organisational barriers. Relevant behaviour change techniques were selected to develop implementation strategy modules using the behaviour change wheel approach to intervention development. Conclusions This paper demonstrates the value of applying the TDF at pre-implementation, to understand context and to support the development of a situationally relevant implementation strategy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00263-9.
Collapse
|
27
|
Totton N, Bradburn M, Hoo ZH, Lewis J, Hind D, Girling C, Shepherd E, Nightingale J, Daniels T, Dewar J, Dawson S, Carroll M, Allenby M, Edenborough F, Curley R, Carolan C, Wildman M. Prospectively predicting Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection/s using routine data from the UK cystic fibrosis register. Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e381. [PMID: 34622017 PMCID: PMC8485591 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE AND AIMS Lung health of people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) can be preserved by daily use of inhaled therapy. Adherence to inhaled therapy, therefore, provides an important process measure to understand the success of care and can be used as a quality indicator. Defining adherence is problematic, however, since the number of prescribed treatments varies considerably between PwCF. The problem is less pronounced among those with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), for whom at least three daily doses of nebulized therapy should be prescribed and who thus constitute a more homogeneous group. The UK CF Registry provides routine data on PA status, but data are only available 12 months after collection. In this study, we aim to prospectively identify contemporary PA status from historic registry data. METHOD UK CF Registry data from 2011 to 2015 for PwCF aged ≥16 was used to determine a pragmatic prediction rule for identifying contemporary PA status using historic registry data. Accuracy of three different prediction rules was assessed using the positive predictive value (PPV). The number and proportion of adults predicted to have PA infection were determined overall and per center for the selected prediction rule. Known characteristics linked to PA status were explored to ensure the robustness of the prediction rule. RESULTS Having CF Registry defined chronic PA status in the two previous years is the selected definition to predict a patient will have PA infection within the current year (population-level PPV = 96%-97%, centre level PPV = 85%-100%). This approach provides a subset of data between 1852 and 1872 patients overall and a range of 8 to 279 patients per center. CONCLUSION Historic registry data can be used to contemporaneously identify a subgroup of patients with chronic PA. Since this patient group has a narrower treatment schedule, this can facilitate a better benchmarking of adherence across centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Totton
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - Zhe Hui Hoo
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK
| | - Jen Lewis
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - Carla Girling
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - Elizabeth Shepherd
- Department of Adult Cystic Fibrosis University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Julia Nightingale
- Department of Adult Cystic Fibrosis University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Thomas Daniels
- Department of Adult Cystic Fibrosis University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Jane Dewar
- Wolfson Cystic Fibrosis Centre Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust Nottingham UK
| | - Sophie Dawson
- Wolfson Cystic Fibrosis Centre Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust Nottingham UK
| | - Mary Carroll
- Department of Adult Cystic Fibrosis University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Mark Allenby
- Department of Adult Cystic Fibrosis University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Frank Edenborough
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK
| | - Rachael Curley
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK
| | - Charlotte Carolan
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK
| | - Martin Wildman
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wildman MJ, O’Cathain A, Hind D, Maguire C, Arden MA, Hutchings M, Bradley J, Walters SJ, Whelan P, Ainsworth J, Tappenden P, Buchan I, Elliott R, Nicholl J, Elborn S, Michie S, Mandefield L, Sutton L, Hoo ZH, Drabble SJ, Lumley E, Beever D, Navega Biz A, Scott A, Waterhouse S, Robinson L, Hernández Alava M, Sasso A. An intervention to support adherence to inhaled medication in adults with cystic fibrosis: the ACtiF research programme including RCT. Programme Grants Appl Res 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background
People with cystic fibrosis frequently have low levels of adherence to inhaled medications.
Objectives
The objectives were to develop and evaluate an intervention for adults with cystic fibrosis to improve adherence to their inhaled medication.
Design
We used agile software methods to develop an online platform. We used mixed methods to develop a behaviour change intervention for delivery by an interventionist. These were integrated to become the CFHealthHub intervention. We undertook a feasibility study consisting of a pilot randomised controlled trial and process evaluation in two cystic fibrosis centres. We evaluated the intervention using an open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with usual care as the control. Participants were randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio to intervention or usual care. Usual care consisted of clinic visits every 3 months. We undertook a process evaluation alongside the randomised controlled trial, including a fidelity study, a qualitative interview study and a mediation analysis. We undertook a health economic analysis using both a within-trial and model-based analysis.
Setting
The randomised controlled trial took place in 19 UK cystic fibrosis centres.
Participants
Participants were people aged ≥ 16 years with cystic fibrosis, on the cystic fibrosis registry, not post lung transplant or on the active transplant list, who were able to consent and not using dry-powder inhalers.
Intervention
People with cystic fibrosis used a nebuliser with electronic monitoring capabilities. This transferred data automatically to a digital platform. People with cystic fibrosis and clinicians could monitor adherence using these data, including through a mobile application (app). CFHealthHub displayed graphs of adherence data as well as educational and problem-solving information. A trained interventionist helped people with cystic fibrosis to address their adherence.
Main outcome measures
Randomised controlled trial – adjusted incidence rate ratio of pulmonary exacerbations meeting the modified Fuchs criteria over a 12-month follow-up period (primary outcome); change in percentage adherence; and per cent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (key secondary outcomes). Process evaluation – percentage fidelity to intervention delivery, and participant and interventionist perceptions of the intervention. Economic modelling – incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
Results
Randomised controlled trial – 608 participants were randomised to the intervention (n = 305) or usual care (n = 303). To our knowledge, this was the largest randomised controlled trial in cystic fibrosis undertaken in the UK. The adjusted rate of exacerbations per year (primary outcome) was 1.63 in the intervention and 1.77 in the usual-care arm (incidence rate ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.12; p = 0.638) after adjustment for covariates. The adjusted difference in mean weekly normative adherence was 9.5% (95% confidence interval 8.6% to 10.4%) across 1 year, favouring the intervention. Adjusted mean difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (per cent) predicted at 12 months was 1.4% (95% confidence interval –0.2% to 3.0%). No adverse events were related to the intervention. Process evaluation – fidelity of intervention delivery was high, the intervention was acceptable to people with cystic fibrosis, participants engaged with the intervention [287/305 (94%) attended the first intervention visit], expected mechanisms of action were identified and contextual factors varied between randomised controlled trial sites. Qualitative interviews with 22 people with cystic fibrosis and 26 interventionists identified that people with cystic fibrosis welcomed the objective adherence data as proof of actions to self and others, and valued the relationship that they built with the interventionists. Economic modelling – the within-trial analysis suggests that the intervention generated 0.01 additional quality-adjusted life-years at an additional cost of £865.91 per patient, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £71,136 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. This should be interpreted with caution owing to the short time horizon. The health economic model suggests that the intervention is expected to generate 0.17 additional quality-adjusted life-years and cost savings of £1790 over a lifetime (70-year) horizon; hence, the intervention is expected to dominate usual care. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the probability that the intervention generates more net benefit than usual care is 0.89. The model results are dependent on assumptions regarding the duration over which costs and effects of the intervention apply, the impact of the intervention on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (per cent) predicted and the relationship between increased adherence and drug-prescribing levels.
Limitations
Number of exacerbations is a sensitive and valid measure of clinical change used in many trials. However, data collection of this outcome in this context was challenging and could have been subject to bias. It was not possible to measure baseline adherence accurately. It was not possible to quantify the impact of the intervention on the number of packs of medicines prescribed.
Conclusions
We developed a feasible and acceptable intervention that was delivered to fidelity in the randomised controlled trial. We observed no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of exacerbation rates over 12 months. We observed an increase in normative adherence levels in a disease where adherence levels are low. The magnitude of the increase in adherence may not have been large enough to affect exacerbations.
Future work
Given the non-significant difference in the primary outcome, further research is required to explore why an increase in objective normative adherence did not reduce exacerbations and to develop interventions that reduce exacerbations.
Trial registration
Work package 3.1: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13076797. Work packages 3.2 and 3.3: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55504164.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J Wildman
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alicia O’Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chin Maguire
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Madelynne A Arden
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marlene Hutchings
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Judy Bradley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Stephen J Walters
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pauline Whelan
- Health eResearch Centre, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Health eResearch Centre, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Tappenden
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Health eResearch Centre, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Public Health and Policy, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rachel Elliott
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jon Nicholl
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stuart Elborn
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Mandefield
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Laura Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Zhe Hui Hoo
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah J Drabble
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Lumley
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Beever
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aline Navega Biz
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anne Scott
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon Waterhouse
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Louisa Robinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Alessandro Sasso
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boxell EG, Malik Y, Wong J, Lee MH, Berntsson HM, Lee MJ, Bourne RS, McCullagh IJ, Hind D, Wilson MJ. Are treatment effects consistent with hypothesized mechanisms of action proposed for postoperative delirium interventions? Reanalysis of systematic reviews. J Comp Eff Res 2021; 10:1301-1315. [PMID: 34585622 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Postoperative delirium (POD) is associated with increased morbidity and is poorly understood. The aim of this review was to identify putative mechanisms through re-analysis of randomized trials on treatment or prevention of POD. Materials & methods: A systematic review was performed to identify systematic reviews of treatments for POD. Constituent randomized controlled trials were identified, and interventions were grouped according to hypothesized mechanisms of action. Effects were meta-analyzed by hypothesized mechanism and timing of intervention. Results: A total of 116 randomized controlled trials described 47 individual interventions for POD, with nine mechanisms identified. The largest effects were observed for postoperative inflammation reduction, and preoperative reinforcement of sleep-wake cycle. Conclusion: This approach identifies treatments focused on mechanisms of action that may be front runners for future trials and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily G Boxell
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Yuhaniz Malik
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Jeyinn Wong
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Min Hyung Lee
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Hannah M Berntsson
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Matthew J Lee
- Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.,Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - Richard S Bourne
- Department of Pharmacy, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - Iain J McCullagh
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Matthew J Wilson
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Strong E, Callaghan T, Beal E, Moffatt C, Wickramasekera N, Brown S, Lee MJ, Winton C, Hind D. Patient decision-making and regret in pilonidal sinus surgery: a mixed-methods study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1487-1498. [PMID: 33645880 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM Little is known about optimal management strategies for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand why patients make, and sometimes regret, treatment decisions. METHOD We conducted longitudinal semi-structured interviews at the time of surgery and 6 months later with 20 patients from 13 UK hospitals. Framework analysis was performed, and themes were mapped to (1) the coping in deliberation framework and (2) an acceptability framework. Results were triangulated with those from structured survey instruments evaluating shared decision-making (SDM, best = 9) at baseline and decision regret (DR, most regret = 100) at 6 months. RESULTS Nine of 20 patients were not offered a choice of treatment, but this was not necessarily seen as negative (SDM median 4; range 2-4). Factors that influenced decision-making included previous experience and anticipated recovery time. Median (range) DR was 5 (0-50). Those with the highest DR (scores 40-50) were, paradoxically, also amongst the highest scores on SDM (scores 4). Burden of wound care and the disparity between anticipated and actual recovery time were the main reasons for decision regret. CONCLUSION To minimize regret about surgical decisions, people with PSD need better information about the burden of wound care and the risks of recurrence associated with different surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Strong
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tia Callaghan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Erin Beal
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christine Moffatt
- School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Steven Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.,Department of General Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Matthew J Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.,Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Catherine Winton
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sheldon E, Simmonds-Buckley M, Bone C, Mascarenhas T, Chan N, Wincott M, Gleeson H, Sow K, Hind D, Barkham M. Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2021; 287:282-292. [PMID: 33812241 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective targeting of services requires that we establish which undergraduates are at increased risk of mental health problems at university. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in undergraduates. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register. Eligible studies were assessed using the Quality of Prognostic Studies checklist and narratively synthesised. Pooled prevalence of depression and suicide-related outcomes, and associated risk factors (odds ratios) were estimated using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS Sixty-six eligible studies of varying quality were included in a narrative synthesis. The pooled prevalence of depression (eight studies; 13,790 participants) was 25% (95% CI 17%, 35%) and the pooled prevalence of suicide-related outcomes (four studies; 2,586 participants) was 14% (95% CI 0%, 44%). Thirteen studies contributed to meta-analytic syntheses of 12 depression-related and four suicide-related risk factors. Presenting with a current mental health problem, negative rumination, parent separation, experiences of sexual harassment and parental depression significantly predicted depression outcomes. Childhood adversity, baseline mental health problems and financial difficulties significantly predicted suicide-related outcomes. LIMITATIONS Student mental health is a heterogeneous research area and is hampered by the use of imprecise terms, both for describing risk factors and mental health outcomes. These inconsistencies limit the extent to which datasets can be meaningfully synthesised. CONCLUSIONS This review evidences the importance of a range of risk factors for poor undergraduate mental health. Interventions should be developed to target modifiable risk factors and prevent poor mental health outcomes. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration CRD42019144927.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Sheldon
- Sheffield Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | - Claire Bone
- Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Thomas Mascarenhas
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Natalie Chan
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Megan Wincott
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Gleeson
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Karmen Sow
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael Barkham
- Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hind D, Allsopp K, Chitsabesan P, French P. The psychosocial response to a terrorist attack at Manchester Arena, 2017: a process evaluation. BMC Psychol 2021; 9:22. [PMID: 33531071 PMCID: PMC7852120 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00527-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A 2017 terrorist attack in Manchester, UK, affected large numbers of adults and young people. During the response phase (first seven weeks), a multi-sector collaborative co-ordinated a decentralised response. In the subsequent recovery phase they implemented a centralised assertive outreach programme, 'The Resilience Hub', to screen and refer those affected. We present a process evaluation conducted after 1 year. METHODS Case study, involving a logic modelling approach, aggregate routine data, and semi-structured interviews topic guides based on the Inter-Agency Collaboration Framework and May's Normalisation Process Theory. Leaders from health, education and voluntary sectors (n = 21) and frontline Resilience Hub workers (n = 6) were sampled for maximum variation or theoretically, then consented and interviewed. Framework analysis of transcripts was undertaken by two researchers. RESULTS Devolved government, a collaborative culture, and existing clinical networks meant that, in the response phase, a collaboration was quickly established between health and education. All but one leader evaluated the response positively, although they were not involved in pre-disaster statutory planning. However, despite overwhelming positive feedback there were clear difficulties. (1) Some voluntary sector colleagues felt that it took some time for them to be involved. (2) Other VCSE organisations were accused of inappropriate, harmful use of early intervention. (3) The health sector were accused of overlooking those below the threshold for clinical treatment. (4) There was a perception that there were barriers to information sharing across organisations, which was particularly evident in relation to attempts to outreach to first responders and other professionals who may have been affected by the incident. (5) Hub workers encountered barriers to referring people who live outside of Greater Manchester. After 1 year of the recovery phase, 877 children and young people and 2375 adults had completed screening via the Resilience Hub, 79% of whom lived outside Greater Manchester. CONCLUSIONS The psychosocial response to terrorist attacks and other contingencies should be planned and practiced before the event, including reviews of communications, protocols, data sharing procedures and workforce capacity. Further research is needed to understand how the health and voluntary sectors can best collaborate in the wake of future incidents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Kate Allsopp
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Prathiba Chitsabesan
- Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK
| | - Paul French
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mallallah F, Packham A, Lee E, Hind D. Is hyperpolarised gas magnetic resonance imaging a valid and reliable tool to detect lung health in cystic fibrosis patients? a cosmin systematic review. J Cyst Fibros 2021; 20:906-919. [PMID: 33454201 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This paper systematically reviewed the literature reporting the validity and reliability of hyperpolarised gas MRI as a marker of lung health in cystic fibrosis (CF). MEDLINE, EMBASE and grey literature were searched for studies assessing the measurement properties of hyperpolarised helium-3 or xenon-129 MRI. The COSMIN risk of bias tool was used to critically appraise eligible studies. Findings show hyperpolarised gas MRI was able to detect structural and functional abnormalities in the lungs, detect response to treatments, and is more sensitive than FEV1 in detecting ventilation defects in CF patients. There was moderately robust evidence for construct validity of hyperpolarised gas MRI, although evidence for other types of validity is currently low. Nonetheless, high quality studies concluded that hyperpolarised gas MRI is a reliable tool and test results are reproducible in CF patients. Hyperpolarised gas MRI is a promising tool for detecting early CF pulmonary disease and for longitudinal monitoring of CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatmah Mallallah
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna Packham
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Arden MA, Hutchings M, Whelan P, Drabble SJ, Beever D, Bradley JM, Hind D, Ainsworth J, Maguire C, Cantrill H, O'Cathain A, Wildman M. Development of an intervention to increase adherence to nebuliser treatment in adults with cystic fibrosis: CFHealthHub. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:1. [PMID: 33390191 PMCID: PMC7780635 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00739-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting genetic condition in which daily therapies to maintain lung health are critical, yet treatment adherence is low. Previous interventions to increase adherence have been largely unsuccessful and this is likely due to a lack of focus on behavioural evidence and theory alongside input from people with CF. This intervention is based on a digital platform that collects and displays objective nebuliser adherence data. The purpose of this paper is to identify the specific components of an intervention to increase and maintain adherence to nebuliser treatments in adults with CF with a focus on reducing effort and treatment burden. METHODS Intervention development was informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and person-based approach (PBA). A multidisciplinary team conducted qualitative research to inform a needs analysis, selected, and refined intervention components and methods of delivery, mapped adherence-related barriers and facilitators, associated intervention functions and behaviour change techniques, and utilised iterative feedback to develop and refine content and processes. RESULTS Results indicated that people with CF need to understand their treatment, be able to monitor adherence, have treatment goals and feedback and confidence in their ability to adhere, have a treatment plan to develop habits for treatment, and be able to solve problems around treatment adherence. Behaviour change techniques were selected to address each of these needs and were incorporated into the digital intervention developed iteratively, alongside a manual and training for health professionals. Feedback from people with CF and clinicians helped to refine the intervention which could be tailored to individual patient needs. CONCLUSIONS The intervention development process is underpinned by a strong theoretical framework and evidence base and was developed by a multidisciplinary team with a range of skills and expertise integrated with substantial input from patients and clinicians. This multifaceted development strategy has ensured that the intervention is usable and acceptable to people with CF and clinicians, providing the best chance of success in supporting people with CF with different needs to increase and maintain their adherence. The intervention is being tested in a randomised controlled trial across 19 UK sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Arden
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, 2.03a Heart of the Campus, Collegiate Crescent Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BQ, UK.
| | - M Hutchings
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - P Whelan
- Health eResearch Centre-Farr Institute, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9GB, UK
| | - S J Drabble
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - D Beever
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - J M Bradley
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
| | - D Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - J Ainsworth
- Health eResearch Centre-Farr Institute, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9GB, UK
| | - C Maguire
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - H Cantrill
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - A O'Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - M Wildman
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alshantti A, Hind D, Hancock L, Brown SR. The role of Kono-S anastomosis and mesenteric resection in reducing recurrence after surgery for Crohn's disease: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:7-17. [PMID: 32418300 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Recurrence after surgery for Crohn's disease is common. Anastomotic configuration may influence recurrence and the mesentery may be key. Recently the Kono-S anastomosis and radical mesenteric excision have been proposed as methods of reducing recurrence. We analysed the literature pertaining to these novel techniques. METHOD We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library for, and selected, studies evaluating Kono-S anastomosis and/or radical mesenteric excision in Crohn's disease. We assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for nonrandomized trials. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the findings. RESULTS Nine studies (896 patients) were identified. Apart from one randomized controlled trial with a low risk of bias the overall level of evidence was poor (Grade IV). The Kono-S anastomosis was associated with a lower incidence of endoscopic and surgical recurrence (0%-3.4% vs 15%-24.4% respectively). Complications, particularly anastomotic leak rate, were also lower (1.8% vs 9.3% respectively). Evidence from a single poor quality study suggested that mesenteric excision may reduce surgical recurrence rates compared with mesentery preservation. CONCLUSION The existing literature suggests that the Kono-S anastomosis is safe and may reduce endoscopic and surgical recurrence, but level of evidence is mainly poor. One element of the Kono-S technique, preservation of the mesentery, may be detrimental to recurrence. Further, higher quality, studies are required to investigate these techniques. Such studies should consider the impact of the degree of mesenteric resection in addition to the anastomosis on disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Hind
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - L Hancock
- Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S R Brown
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee MJ, Dimairo M, Edwards J, Hawkins DJ, Hind D, Knowles CH, Hooper R, Brown SR. Non-randomized studies should be considered for assessing surgical techniques in rectal prolapse: prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2170-2180. [PMID: 32757339 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Randomized trials comparing surgical techniques for rectal prolapse are not always feasible. We assessed whether non-randomized comparisons of those who have had surgery with those still waiting would be confounding baseline health status. METHOD This was a prospective cohort study in seven UK hospitals. Participants were ≥ 18 years and listed for surgical interventions of equivalent intensity for rectal prolapse. They were defined as short or long waiters (≤ 18 or > 18 weeks, respectively). Time on the waiting list was compared with baseline comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index) and change from baseline in health status (EQ-5D-5L) at the time of surgery. RESULTS In all, 203 patients were analysed. Median (interquartile range) waiting time was 13.7 weeks (8.1, 20.4) varying across sites. Baseline comorbidity was not an important predictor of waiting time. Median Charlson comorbidity index was 2 (0, 3) for short and 1 (0, 3) for long waiters. A change in waiting time by a week was associated with negligible improvement in the EQ-5D-5L index of 0.001 (95% CI -0.000 to 0.003, P = 0.106). CONCLUSION Negligible change in patient reported health status while on the waiting list and lack of effect of comorbidities in influencing waiting time support the use of non-randomized pre-/post-studies to compare the effects of surgical interventions for rectal prolapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Lee
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Dimairo
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - J Edwards
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - D J Hawkins
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - D Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - C H Knowles
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R Hooper
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S R Brown
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hind D, Drabble SJ, Arden MA, Mandefield L, Waterhouse S, Maguire C, Cantrill H, Robinson L, Beever D, Scott A, Keating S, Hutchings M, Bradley J, Nightingale J, Allenby MI, Dewar J, Whelan P, Ainsworth J, Walters SJ, Wildman MJ, O'Cathain A. Feasibility study for supporting medication adherence for adults with cystic fibrosis: mixed-methods process evaluation. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039089. [PMID: 33109661 PMCID: PMC7592300 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To undertake a process evaluation of an adherence support intervention for people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF), to assess its feasibility and acceptability. SETTING Two UK cystic fibrosis (CF) units. PARTICIPANTS Fourteen adult PWCF; three professionals delivering adherence support ('interventionists'); five multi-disciplinary CF team members. INTERVENTIONS Nebuliser with data recording and transfer capability, linked to a software platform, and strategies to support adherence to nebulised treatments facilitated by interventionists over 5 months (± 1 month). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, assessed through semistructured interviews, questionnaires, fidelity assessments and click analytics. RESULTS Interventionists were complimentary about the intervention and training. Key barriers to intervention feasibility and acceptability were identified. Interventionists had difficulty finding clinic space and time in normal working hours to conduct review visits. As a result, fewer than expected intervention visits were conducted and interviews indicated this may explain low adherence in some intervention arm participants. Adherence levels appeared to be >100% for some patients, due to inaccurate prescription data, particularly in patients with complex treatment regimens. Flatlines in adherence data at the start of the study were linked to device connectivity problems. Content and delivery quality fidelity were 100% and 60%-92%, respectively, indicating that interventionists needed to focus more on intervention 'active ingredients' during sessions. CONCLUSIONS The process evaluation led to 14 key changes to intervention procedures to overcome barriers to intervention success. With the identified changes, it is feasible and acceptable to support medication adherence with this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN13076797; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hind
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah J Drabble
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Madelynne A Arden
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Simon Waterhouse
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chin Maguire
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Cantrill
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Louisa Robinson
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Beever
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alex Scott
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sam Keating
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marlene Hutchings
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Judy Bradley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Julia Nightingale
- Wessex Adult Cystic Fibrosis Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark I Allenby
- Wessex Adult Cystic Fibrosis Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Dewar
- Wolfson Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pauline Whelan
- Health eResearch Centre - Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Health eResearch Centre - Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen J Walters
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin J Wildman
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alicia O'Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bradburn MJ, Lee EC, White DA, Hind D, Waugh NR, Cooke DD, Hopkins D, Mansell P, Heller SR. Treatment effects may remain the same even when trial participants differed from the target population. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 124:126-138. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
39
|
Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, Todd S, Jaki T, Julious SA, Mander AP, Weir CJ, Koenig F, Walton MK, Nicholl JP, Coates E, Biggs K, Hamasaki T, Proschan MA, Scott JA, Ando Y, Hind D, Altman DG. The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. Trials 2020; 21:528. [PMID: 32546273 PMCID: PMC7298968 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Adaptive designs (ADs) allow pre-planned changes to an ongoing trial without compromising the validity of conclusions and it is essential to distinguish pre-planned from unplanned changes that may also occur. The reporting of ADs in randomised trials is inconsistent and needs improving. Incompletely reported AD randomised trials are difficult to reproduce and are hard to interpret and synthesise. This consequently hampers their ability to inform practice as well as future research and contributes to research waste. Better transparency and adequate reporting will enable the potential benefits of ADs to be realised.This extension to the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement was developed to enhance the reporting of randomised AD clinical trials. We developed an Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) guideline through a two-stage Delphi process with input from multidisciplinary key stakeholders in clinical trials research in the public and private sectors from 21 countries, followed by a consensus meeting. Members of the CONSORT Group were involved during the development process.The paper presents the ACE checklists for AD randomised trial reports and abstracts, as well as an explanation with examples to aid the application of the guideline. The ACE checklist comprises seven new items, nine modified items, six unchanged items for which additional explanatory text clarifies further considerations for ADs, and 20 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text. The ACE abstract checklist has one new item, one modified item, one unchanged item with additional explanatory text for ADs, and 15 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text.The intention is to enhance transparency and improve reporting of AD randomised trials to improve the interpretability of their results and reproducibility of their methods, results and inference. We also hope indirectly to facilitate the much-needed knowledge transfer of innovative trial designs to maximise their potential benefits. In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the BMJ and Trials journal websites."To maximise the benefit to society, you need to not just do research but do it well" Douglas G Altman.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munyaradzi Dimairo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | | | - James Wason
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Steven A Julious
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Adrian P Mander
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher J Weir
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Franz Koenig
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marc K Walton
- Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jon P Nicholl
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coates
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Katie Biggs
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - Michael A Proschan
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - John A Scott
- Division of Biostatistics in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, USA
| | - Yuki Ando
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Douglas G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, Todd S, Jaki T, Julious SA, Mander AP, Weir CJ, Koenig F, Walton MK, Nicholl JP, Coates E, Biggs K, Hamasaki T, Proschan MA, Scott JA, Ando Y, Hind D, Altman DG. The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. BMJ 2020; 369:m115. [PMID: 32554564 PMCID: PMC7298567 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive designs (ADs) allow pre-planned changes to an ongoing trial without compromising the validity of conclusions and it is essential to distinguish pre-planned from unplanned changes that may also occur. The reporting of ADs in randomised trials is inconsistent and needs improving. Incompletely reported AD randomised trials are difficult to reproduce and are hard to interpret and synthesise. This consequently hampers their ability to inform practice as well as future research and contributes to research waste. Better transparency and adequate reporting will enable the potential benefits of ADs to be realised.This extension to the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement was developed to enhance the reporting of randomised AD clinical trials. We developed an Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) guideline through a two-stage Delphi process with input from multidisciplinary key stakeholders in clinical trials research in the public and private sectors from 21 countries, followed by a consensus meeting. Members of the CONSORT Group were involved during the development process.The paper presents the ACE checklists for AD randomised trial reports and abstracts, as well as an explanation with examples to aid the application of the guideline. The ACE checklist comprises seven new items, nine modified items, six unchanged items for which additional explanatory text clarifies further considerations for ADs, and 20 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text. The ACE abstract checklist has one new item, one modified item, one unchanged item with additional explanatory text for ADs, and 15 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text.The intention is to enhance transparency and improve reporting of AD randomised trials to improve the interpretability of their results and reproducibility of their methods, results and inference. We also hope indirectly to facilitate the much-needed knowledge transfer of innovative trial designs to maximise their potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munyaradzi Dimairo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - James Wason
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, UK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, UK
| | - Steven A Julious
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Adrian P Mander
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher J Weir
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Franz Koenig
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jon P Nicholl
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coates
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Katie Biggs
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - Michael A Proschan
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, USA
| | - John A Scott
- Division of Biostatistics in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, USA
| | - Yuki Ando
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chapman SJ, Lee MJ, Blackwell S, Arnott R, Ten Broek RPG, Delaney CP, Dudi-Venkata NN, Hind D, Jayne DG, Mellor K, Mishra A, O'Grady G, Sammour T, Thorpe G, Wells CI, Wolthuis AM, Fearnhead NS. Establishing core outcome sets for gastrointestinal recovery in studies of postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction: protocol for a nested methodological study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:459-464. [PMID: 31701620 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal recovery describes the restoration of normal bowel function in patients with bowel disease. This may be prolonged in two common clinical settings: postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction. Improving gastrointestinal recovery is a research priority but researchers are limited by variation in outcome reporting across clinical studies. This protocol describes the development of core outcome sets for gastrointestinal recovery in the contexts of postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction. METHOD An international Steering Group consisting of patient and clinician representatives has been established. As overlap between clinical contexts is anticipated, both outcome sets will be co-developed and may be combined to form a common output with disease-specific domains. The development process will comprise three phases, including definition of outcomes relevant to postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction from systematic literature reviews and nominal-group stakeholder discussions; online-facilitated Delphi surveys via international networks; and a consensus meeting to ratify the final output. A nested study will explore if the development of overlapping outcome sets can be rationalized. DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION The final output will be registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative. A multi-faceted, quality improvement campaign for the reporting of gastrointestinal recovery in clinical studies will be launched, targeting international professional and patient groups, charitable organizations and editorial committees. Success will be explored via an updated systematic review of outcomes 5 years after registration of the core outcome set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M J Lee
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - R Arnott
- Patient Representative, Green Templeton College, Oxford, UK
| | - R P G Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - C P Delaney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - N N Dudi-Venkata
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - D Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - D G Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K Mellor
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - A Mishra
- Department of Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - G O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - T Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - G Thorpe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - C I Wells
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - A M Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Flight L, Julious S, Brennan A, Todd S, Hind D. How can health economics be used in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials? A qualitative analysis. Trials 2020; 21:252. [PMID: 32143728 PMCID: PMC7060544 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4137-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adaptive designs offer a flexible approach, allowing changes to a trial based on examinations of the data as it progresses. Adaptive clinical trials are becoming a popular choice, as the prudent use of finite research budgets and accurate decision-making are priorities for healthcare providers around the world. The methods of health economics, which aim to maximise the health gained for money spent, could be incorporated into the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials to make them more efficient. We aimed to understand the perspectives of stakeholders in health technology assessments to inform recommendations for the use of health economics in adaptive clinical trials. METHODS A qualitative study explored the attitudes of key stakeholders-including researchers, decision-makers and members of the public-towards the use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials. Data were collected using interviews and focus groups (29 participants). A framework analysis was used to identify themes in the transcripts. RESULTS It was considered that answering the clinical research question should be the priority in a clinical trial, notwithstanding the importance of cost-effectiveness for decision-making. Concerns raised by participants included handling the volatile nature of cost data at interim analyses; implementing this approach in global trials; resourcing adaptive trials which are designed and adapted based on health economic outcomes; and training stakeholders in these methods so that they can be implemented and appropriately interpreted. CONCLUSION The use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials has the potential to increase the efficiency of health technology assessments worldwide. Recommendations are made concerning the development of methods allowing the use of health economics in adaptive clinical trials, and suggestions are given to facilitate their implementation in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Flight
- School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steven Julious
- School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Brennan
- School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Biggs K, Hind D, Gossage-Worrall R, Sprange K, White D, Wright J, Chatters R, Berry K, Papaioannou D, Bradburn M, Walters SJ, Cooper C. Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions. Trials 2020; 21:116. [PMID: 31996259 PMCID: PMC6990578 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3807-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Group interventions are interventions delivered to groups of people rather than to individuals and are used in healthcare for mental health recovery, behaviour change, peer support, self-management and/or health education. Evaluating group interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) presents trialists with a set of practical problems, which are not present in RCTs of one-to-one interventions and which may not be immediately obvious. Methods Case-based approach summarising Sheffield trials unit’s experience in the design and implementation of five group interventions. We reviewed participant recruitment and attrition, facilitator training and attrition, attendance at the group sessions, group size and fidelity aspects across five RCTs. Results Median recruitment across the five trials was 3.2 (range 1.7–21.0) participants per site per month. Group intervention trials involve a delay in starting the intervention for some participants, until sufficient numbers are available to start a group. There was no evidence that the timing of consent, relative to randomisation, affected post-randomisation attrition which was a matter of concern for all trial teams. Group facilitator attrition was common in studies where facilitators were employed by the health system rather than the by the grant holder and led to the early closure of one trial; research sites responded by training ‘back-up’ and new facilitators. Trials specified that participants had to attend a median of 62.5% (range 16.7%–80%) of sessions, in order to receive a ‘therapeutic dose’; a median of 76.7% (range 42.9%–97.8%) received a therapeutic dose. Across the five trials, 75.3% of all sessions went ahead without the pre-specified ideal group size. A variety of methods were used to assess the fidelity of group interventions at a group and individual level across the five trials. Conclusion This is the first paper to provide an empirical basis for planning group intervention trials. Investigators should expect delays/difficulties in recruiting groups of the optimal size, plan for both facilitator and participant attrition, and consider how group attendance and group size affects treatment fidelity. Trial registration ISRCTN17993825 registered on 11/10/2016, ISRCTN28645428 registered on 11/04/2012, ISRCTN61215213 registered on 11/05/2011, ISRCTN67209155 registered on 22/03/2012, ISRCTN19447796 registered on 20/03/2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Biggs
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David White
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Jessica Wright
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Robin Chatters
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Diana Papaioannou
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Stephen J Walters
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Cindy Cooper
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gossage-Worrall R, Hind D, Barnard-Kelly KD, Shiers D, Etherington A, Swaby L, Holt RIG. STructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:358. [PMID: 31722694 PMCID: PMC6854755 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2282-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND STEPWISE is a theory-informed self-management education programme that was co-produced with service users, healthcare professionals and interventionists to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia. We report the process evaluation to inform understanding about the intervention and its effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated its efficacy. METHODS Following the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for developing and evaluating complex interventions, we explored implementation quality. We considered causal mechanisms, unanticipated consequences and contextual factors associated with variation in actual and intended outcomes, and integrated treatment fidelity, using the programme theory and a pipeline logic model. We followed a modified version of Linnan and Steckler's framework and single case design. Qualitative data from semi-structured telephone interviews with service-users (n = 24), healthcare professionals delivering the intervention (n = 20) and interventionists (n = 7) were triangulated with quantitative process and RCT outcome data and with observations by interventionists, to examine convergence within logic model components. RESULTS Training and course materials were available although lacked co-ordination in some trusts. Healthcare professionals gained knowledge and some contemplated changing their practice to reflect the (facilitative) 'style' of delivery. They were often responsible for administrative activities increasing the burden of delivery. Healthcare professionals recognised the need to address antipsychotic-induced weight gain and reported potential value from the intervention (subject to the RCT results). However, some doubted senior management commitment and sustainability post-trial. Service-users found the intervention highly acceptable, especially being in a group of people with similar experiences. Service-users perceived weight loss and lifestyle benefits; however, session attendance varied with 23% (n = 47) attending all group-sessions and 17% (n = 36) attending none. Service-users who lost weight wanted closer monitoring and many healthcare professionals wanted to monitor outcomes (e.g. weight) but it was outside the intervention design. No clinical or cost benefit was demonstrated from the intermediate outcomes (RCT) and any changes in RCT outcomes were not due to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS This process evaluation provides a greater understanding of why STEPWISE was unsuccessful in promoting weight loss during the clinical trial. Further research is required to evaluate whether different levels of contact and objective monitoring can support people with schizophrenia to lose weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN19447796. Registered 20 March 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- 0000 0004 1936 9262grid.11835.3eClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Katharine D. Barnard-Kelly
- 0000 0001 0728 4630grid.17236.31Faculty of Health & Social Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, UK
| | - David Shiers
- 0000000121662407grid.5379.8Honorary Research Consultant, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Honorary Reader in Early Psychosis, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Angela Etherington
- Patient Representative, Independent Service User Consultant, Manchester, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- 0000 0004 1936 9262grid.11835.3eClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Richard I. G. Holt
- 0000 0004 1936 9297grid.5491.9Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK ,grid.430506.4University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Biggs K, Hind D, Bradburn M, Swaby L, Brown S. Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:620. [PMID: 31675992 PMCID: PMC6823948 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. Methods Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical randomised controlled trial are discussed. In this surgical trial, forecasting of consent rates based on similar trials and micro-costing of study activities with research partners were undertaken and a video was produced targeting recruiting staff with the aim of aiding recruitment. The baseline assessments were reviewed to ensure the timing did not impact on the outcome. Attrition due to procedure waiting time was monitored and data were triangulated for the primary outcome to ensure adequate follow-up data. Results Forecasting and costing ensured that the recruitment window was of adequate length and adequate resource was available for study procedures at multiple clinics in each hospital. Recruiting staff found the recruitment video useful. The comparison of patient-reported data collected prior to randomisation and prior to treatment provided confidence in the baseline data. Knowledge of participant dropout due to delays in treatment meant we were able to increase the recruitment target in a timely fashion, and along with the triangulation of data sources, this ensured adequate follow-up of randomised participants. Conclusions This paper provides a range of evidence-based and experience-based approaches which, collectively, resulted in meeting our study objectives and from which lessons may be transferable. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN41394716. Registered on 10 May 2012. UKCRN Study ID: 12486.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Biggs
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Steve Brown
- Department of Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- M Lee
- Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - D Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Brown
- Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Swaby L, Holt R, Gossage-Worrall R, Hind D. Provision of weight loss programmes and their influence on weight after 1 year: follow-up survey of usual care in the STEPWISE study. BJPsych Bull 2019; 43:245-246. [PMID: 31496459 PMCID: PMC8058837 DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2019.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lizzie Swaby
- Study Manager, Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Sheffield.
| | - Richard Holt
- Professor in Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Southampton
| | | | - Daniel Hind
- Assistant Director, CTRU, University of Sheffield
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
French P, Barrett A, Allsopp K, Williams R, Brewin CR, Hind D, Sutton R, Stancombe J, Chitsabesan P. Psychological screening of adults and young people following the Manchester Arena incident. BJPsych Open 2019; 5:e85. [PMID: 31533867 PMCID: PMC6788223 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2019.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Terrorist attacks have increased globally since the late 1990s with clear evidence of psychological distress across both adults and children and young people (CYP). After the Manchester Arena terrorist attack, the Resilience Hub was established to identify people in need of psychological and psychosocial support. AIMS To examine the severity of symptoms and impact of the programme. METHOD The hub offers outreach, screening, clinical telephone triage and facilitation to access evidenced treatments. People were screened for trauma, depression, generalised anxiety and functioning who registered at 3, 6 and 9 months post-incident. Baseline scores were compared between screening groups (first screen at 3, 6 or 9 months) in each cohort (adult, CYP), and within groups to compare scores at 9 months. RESULTS There were significant differences in adults' baseline scores across screening groups on trauma, depression, anxiety and functioning. There were significant differences in the baseline scores of CYP across screening groups on trauma, depression, generalised anxiety and separation anxiety. Paired samples t-tests demonstrated significant differences between baseline and follow-up scores on all measures for adults in the 3-month screening group, and only depression and functioning measures for adults in the 6-month screening group. Data about CYP in the 3-month screening group, demonstrated significant differences between baseline and follow-up scores on trauma, generalised anxiety and separation anxiety. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest people who register earlier are less symptomatic and demonstrate greater improvement across a range of psychological measures. Further longitudinal research is necessary to understand changes over time. DECLARATION OF INTEREST None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul French
- Clinical Researcher, Research and Innovation Department, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester; and Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
| | - Alan Barrett
- Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Clinical Lead Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust; and School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, UK
| | - Kate Allsopp
- Research Associate, Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Richard Williams
- Emeritus Professor of Mental Health Strategy, Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, UK
| | - Chris R. Brewin
- Professor of Clinical Psychology, University College London, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Reader in Complex Interventions, School of Health and Related Research, UK
| | - Rebecca Sutton
- Research Assistant, Greater Manchester Mental Health Care, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - John Stancombe
- Clinical Psychologist, Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Prathiba Chitsabesan
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust; and Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rombey T, Panagiotopoulou IG, Hind D, Fearnhead NS. Preoperative bowel stimulation prior to ileostomy closure to restore bowel function more quickly and improve postoperative outcomes: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:994-1003. [PMID: 30963659 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Closure of a diverting ileostomy following restorative surgery is often associated with significant short-term morbidity and variable long-term bowel function. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate if preoperative stimulation of the defunctioned bowel restores bowel function more quickly after ileostomy closure and improves postoperative outcomes when compared with standard preoperative care. METHOD MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies evaluating preoperative bowel stimulation in patients with a temporary ileostomy after low anterior resection or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, regardless of their design, publication type or language. Study selection, data extraction and study assessment were performed by one reviewer and verified by another. Study results were synthesized narratively. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS Eight studies involving a total of 267 participants were included. The studies had a moderate to high risk of bias and were of varying methodological quality. Preoperative stimulation of the defunctioned bowel reduced the time to postoperative restoration of bowel function and the length of hospital stay when compared with standard preoperative care. Other functional outcomes and postoperative complication rates were similar to those of standard preoperative care. The overall quality of evidence was very low. CONCLUSION Despite these promising early results, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to recommend routine implementation of preoperative bowel stimulation in clinical practice. Nevertheless, there is no evidence suggesting that the intervention worsens outcomes or is unsafe, paving the way for rigorous assessment of effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness within the context of well-designed clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Rombey
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - I G Panagiotopoulou
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Allsopp
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Alan Barrett
- Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Richard Williams
- Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK
| | - Prathiba Chitsabesan
- Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul French
- Research and Innovation Department, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|