1
|
Sheldon E, Ezaydi N, Ditmore M, Fuseini O, Ainley R, Robinson K, Hind D, Lobo AJ. Patient and public involvement in the development of health services: Engagement of underserved populations in a quality improvement programme for inflammatory bowel disease using a community-based participatory approach. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14004. [PMID: 38433003 PMCID: PMC10909615 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Involving people with lived experience is fundamental to healthcare development and delivery. This is especially true for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) services, where holistic and personalised models of care are becoming increasingly important. There is, however, a significant lack of representation of underserved and diverse groups in IBD research, and there are significant barriers to healthcare access and utilisation among minority groups in IBD. IBD centres need to be aware of these experiences to address barriers via service changes, improve interactions with local communities and promote meaningful engagement for improved health outcomes. METHODS A pragmatic community-based approach was taken to engage with leaders and members of underserved groups across 11 workshops representing Roma, Afro-Caribbean, people of African descent and the wider black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, Muslim women, refugee community members, deprived areas of South Yorkshire, LGBTQ+ and deaf populations. Thematic analysis of field notes identified patterns of attention across the community groups and where improvements to services were most frequently suggested. RESULTS Findings demonstrated several barriers experienced to healthcare access and utilisation, including language accessibility, staff attitudes and awareness, mental health and stigma, continuity of support, and practical factors such as ease of service use and safe spaces. These barriers acted as a lever to co-producing service changes that are responsive to the health and social care needs of these groups. CONCLUSIONS Engaging with people from a range of communities is imperative for ensuring that service improvements in IBD are accessible and representative of individual needs and values. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Local community leaders and members of community groups actively participated in the co-design and development of improvements to the IBD service for a local hospital. Their contributions further informed a pilot process for quality improvement programmes in IBD centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Sheldon
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR)The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Naseeb Ezaydi
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR)The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | | | - Olga Fuseini
- Freelance Interpreter and Roma ConsultantSheffieldUK
| | | | - Kerry Robinson
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR)The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Alan J. Lobo
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goff M, Jacobs S, Hammond J, Hindi A, Checkland K. Investigating the impact of primary care networks on continuity of care in English general practice: Analysis of interviews with patients and clinicians from a mixed methods study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14032. [PMID: 38556844 PMCID: PMC10982586 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In England, primary care networks (PCNs) offer opportunities to improve access to and sustainability of general practice through collaboration between groups of practices to provide care with a broader range of practitioner roles. However, there are concerns that these changes may undermine continuity of care. Our study investigates what the organisational shift to PCNs means for continuity of care. METHODS The paper uses thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews with general practitioners and other healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 33) in 19 practices in five PCNs, and their patients (n = 35). Three patient cohorts within each participating practice were recruited, based on anticipated higher or lower needs for continuity of care: patients over 65 years with polypharmacy, patients with anxiety or depression and 'working age' adults aged between 18 and 45 years. FINDINGS Patients and clinicians perceived changes to continuity in PCNs in our study. Larger-scale care provision in PCNs required better care coordination and information-sharing processes, aimed at improving care for 'vulnerable' patients in target groups. However, new working arrangements and ways of delivering care in PCNs undermine HCPs' ability to maintain continuity through ongoing relationships with patients. Patients experience this in terms of reduced availability of their preferred clinician, inefficiencies in care and unfamiliarity of new staff, roles and processes. CONCLUSIONS New practitioners need to be effectively integrated to support effective team-based care. However, for patients, especially those not deemed 'vulnerable', this may not be sufficient to counter the loss of relationship with their practice. Therefore, caution is required in relation to designating patients as in need of, or not in need of continuity. Rather, continuity for all patients could be maintained through a dynamic understanding of the need for it as fluctuating and situational and by supporting clinicians to provide follow-up care. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (PPI) A PPI group was recruited and consulted during the study for feedback on the study design, recruitment materials and interpretation of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mhorag Goff
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Sally Jacobs
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | | | - Ali Hindi
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Kath Checkland
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoare S, Thomas GPA, Powell A, Armstrong N, Mant J, Burt J. Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation. Health Expect 2023; 26:2216-2227. [PMID: 37452480 PMCID: PMC10632648 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While screening uptake is variable, many individuals feel they 'ought' to participate in screening programmes to aid the detection of conditions amenable to early treatment. Those not taking part in screening are often presented as either hindered by practical or social barriers or personally at fault. Why some people choose not to participate receives less consideration. METHODS We explored screening nonparticipation by examining the accounts of participants who chose not to participate in screening offered by a national research trial of atrial fibrillation (AF) screening in England (SAFER: Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke). AF is a heart arrhythmia that increases in prevalence with age and increases the risk of stroke. Systematic screening for AF is not a nationally adopted programme within the United Kingdom; it provides a unique opportunity to explore screening nonparticipation outside of the norms and values attached to existing population-based screening programmes. We interviewed people aged over 65 (n = 50) who declined an invitation from SAFER and analysed their accounts thematically. RESULTS Beyond practical reasons for nonparticipation, interviewees challenged the utility of identifying and managing AF earlier. Many questioned the benefits of screening at their age. The trial's presentation of the screening as research made it feel voluntary-something they could legitimately decline. CONCLUSION Nonparticipants were not resistant to engaging in health-promoting behaviours, uninformed about screening or unsupportive of its potential benefits. Instead, their consideration of the perceived necessity, legitimacy and utility of this screening shaped their decision not to take part. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The SAFER programme is guided by four patient and carer representatives. The representatives are embedded within the team (e.g., one is a co-applicant, another sits on the programme steering committee) and by participating in regular meetings advise on all aspects of the design, management and delivery of the programme, including engaging with interpreting and disseminating the findings. For the qualitative workstream, we established a supplementary patient and public involvement group with whom we regularly consult about research design questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hoare
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Gwilym P. A. Thomas
- The Guildhall and Barrow SurgeryBury St EdmundsUK
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alison Powell
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Natalie Armstrong
- SAPPHIRE Research Group, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Jonathan Mant
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Jenni Burt
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McGeown H, Potter L, Stone T, Swede J, Cramer H, Horwood J, Carvalho M, Connell F, Feder G, Farr M. Trauma-informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs. Health Expect 2023; 26:1895-1914. [PMID: 37430474 PMCID: PMC10485347 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health, social care, charitable and justice sectors are increasingly recognising the need for trauma-informed services that seek to recognise signs of trauma, provide appropriate paths to recovery and ensure that services enable people rather than retraumatise. Foundational to the development of trauma-informed services is collaboration with people with lived experience of trauma. Co-production principles may provide a useful framework for this collaboration, due to their emphasis on lived experience, and intent to address power imbalances and promote equity. This article aims to examine trauma-informed and co-production principles to consider the extent to which they overlap and explore how to tailor co-production approaches to support people who have experienced trauma. METHODS Bridging Gaps is a collaboration between women who have experienced complex trauma, a charity that supports them, primary care clinicians and health researchers to improve access to trauma-informed primary care. Using co-production principles, we aimed to ensure that women who have experienced trauma were key decision-makers throughout the project. Through reflective notes (n = 19), observations of meetings (n = 3), interviews with people involved in the project (n = 9) and reflective group discussions on our experiences, we share learning, successes and failures. Data analysis followed a framework approach, using trauma-informed principles. RESULTS Co-production processes can require adaptation when working with people who have experienced trauma. We emphasise the need for close partnership working, flexibility and transparency around power dynamics, paying particular attention to aspects of power that are less readily visible. Sharing experiences can retrigger trauma. People conducting co-production work need to understand trauma and how this may impact upon an individual's sense of psychological safety. Long-term funding is vital to enable projects to have enough time for the establishment of trust and delivery of tangible results. CONCLUSIONS Co-production principles are highly suitable when developing trauma-informed services. Greater consideration needs to be given as to whether and how people share lived experiences, the need for safe spaces, honesty and humility, difficult dynamics between empowerment and safety and whether and when blurring boundaries may be helpful. Our findings have applicability to policy-making, funding and service provision to enable co-production processes to become more trauma-informed. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Bridging Gaps was started by a group of women who have experienced complex trauma, including addiction, homelessness, mental health problems, sexual exploitation, domestic and sexual violence and poverty, with a general practitioner (GP) who provides healthcare to this population, alongside a support worker from the charity One25, a charity that supports some of the most marginalised women in Bristol to heal and thrive. More GPs and healthcare researchers joined the group and they have been meeting fortnightly for a period of 4 years with the aim of improving access to trauma-informed primary care. The group uses co-production principles to work together, and we aim to ensure that women who have experienced trauma are key decision-makers throughout our work together. This article is a summary of our learning, informed by discussion, observations and interviews with members of the group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen McGeown
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Lucy Potter
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Tracey Stone
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation TrustBristolUK
| | | | - Helen Cramer
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | | | - Jeremy Horwood
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation TrustBristolUK
| | | | | | - Gene Feder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Michelle Farr
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation TrustBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cornthwaite K, Hewitt P, van der Scheer JW, Brown IAF, Burt J, Dufresne E, Dixon‐Woods M, Draycott T, Bahl R. Definition, management, and training in impacted fetal head at cesarean birth: a national survey of maternity professionals. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102:1219-1226. [PMID: 37430482 PMCID: PMC10407013 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assessed views, understanding and current practices of maternity professionals in relation to impacted fetal head at cesarean birth, with the aim of informing a standardized definition, clinical management approaches and training. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a survey consultation including the range of maternity professionals who attend emergency cesarean births in the UK. Thiscovery, an online research and development platform, was used to ask closed-ended and free-text questions. Simple descriptive analysis was undertaken for closed-ended responses, and content analysis for categorization and counting of free-text responses. Main outcome measures included the count and percentage of participants selecting predefined options on clinical definition, multi-professional team approach, communication, clinical management and training. RESULTS In total, 419 professionals took part, including 144 midwives, 216 obstetricians and 59 other clinicians (eg anesthetists). We found high levels of agreement on the components of an impacted fetal head definition (79% of obstetricians) and the need for use of a multi-professional approach to management (95% of all participants). Over 70% of obstetricians deemed nine techniques acceptable for management of impacted fetal head, but some obstetricians also considered potentially unsafe practices appropriate. Access to professional training in management of impacted fetal head was highly variable, with over 80% of midwives reporting no training in vaginal disimpaction. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate agreement on the components of a standardized definition for impacted fetal head, and a need and appetite for multi-professional training. These findings can inform a program of work to improve care, including use of structured management algorithms and simulation-based multi-professional training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Cornthwaite
- Royal College of Obstetricians & GynaecologistsLondonUK
- Translational Health SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | | | - Jan W. van der Scheer
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Imogen A. F. Brown
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Jenni Burt
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Mary Dixon‐Woods
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Tim Draycott
- Royal College of Obstetricians & GynaecologistsLondonUK
- North Bristol NHS TrustBristolUK
| | | | | | - Rachna Bahl
- Royal College of Obstetricians & GynaecologistsLondonUK
- University Hospitals Bristol and WestonBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Foley T, Vale L. A framework for understanding, designing, developing and evaluating learning health systems. Learn Health Syst 2023; 7:e10315. [PMID: 36654802 PMCID: PMC9835047 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A Learning Health System is not a technical project. It is the evolution of an existing health system into one capable of learning from every patient. This paper outlines a recently published framework intended to aid the understanding, design, development and evaluation of Learning Health Systems. Methods This work extended an existing repository of Learning Health System evidence, adding five more workshops. The total was subjected to thematic analysis, yielding a framework of elements important to understanding, designing, developing and evaluating Learning Health Systems. Purposeful literature reviews were conducted on each element. The findings were revised following a review by a group of international experts. Results The resulting framework was arranged around four questions:What is our rationale for developing a Learning Health System?There can be many reasons for developing a Learning Health System. Understanding these will guide its development.What sources of complexity exist at the system and the intervention level?An understanding of complexity is central to making Learning Health Systems work. The non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability framework was utilised to help understand and manage it.What strategic approaches to change do we need to consider?A range of strategic issues must be addressed to enable successful change in a Learning Health System. These include, strategy, organisational structure, culture, workforce, implementation science, behaviour change, co-design and evaluation.What technical building blocks will we need?A Learning Health System must capture data from practice, turn it into knowledge and apply it back into practice. There are many methods to achieve this and a range of platforms to help. Discussion The results form a framework for understanding, designing, developing and evaluating Learning Health Systems at any scale. Conclusion It is hoped that this framework will evolve with use and feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Foley
- PI Learning Healthcare Project, Health Economics GroupPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle‐upon‐TyneUK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics GroupPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle‐upon‐TyneUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lippiett K, Richardson A, May CR. How do illness identity, patient workload and agentic capacity interact to shape patient and caregiver experience? Comparative analysis of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Soc Care Community 2022; 30:e4545-e4555. [PMID: 35633149 PMCID: PMC10084268 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Some patients have to work hard to manage their illness. When this work outweighs capacity (the resources available to patients to undertake the illness workload and other workloads such as that of daily life), this may result in treatment burden, associated with poor health outcomes for patients. This cross-sectional, comparative qualitative analysis uses an abductive approach to identify, characterise and explain treatment burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer. It uses complementary qualitative methods (semi-structured interviews with patients receiving specialist care n = 19, specialist clinicians n = 5; non-participant observation of specialist outpatient consultations in two English hospitals [11 h, 52 min] n = 41). The findings underline the importance of the diagnostic process in relation to treatment burden; whether diagnosis is experienced as a biographically disruptive shock (as with lung cancer) or is insidiously biographically erosive (as with COPD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Lippiett
- School of Health SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration WessexSouthamptonUK
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration WessexSouthamptonUK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | - Carl R. May
- Faculty of Public Health and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North ThamesLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avancini C, Jennings S, Chennu S, Noreika V, Le A, Bekinschtein TA, Walpert MJ, Clare ICH, Holland AJ, Zaman SH, Ring H. Exploring electrophysiological markers of auditory predictive processes and pathological ageing in adults with Down's syndrome. Eur J Neurosci 2022; 56:5615-5636. [PMID: 35799324 PMCID: PMC9796678 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Down's syndrome is associated with pathological ageing and a propensity for early-onset Alzheimer's disease. The early symptoms of dementia in people with Down's syndrome may reflect frontal lobe vulnerability to amyloid deposition. Auditory predictive processes rely on the bilateral auditory cortices with the recruitment of frontal cortices and appear to be impaired in pathologies characterized by compromised frontal lobe. Hence, auditory predictive processes were investigated to assess Down's syndrome pathology and its relationship with pathological ageing. An auditory electroencephalography (EEG) global-local paradigm was presented to the participants, in which oddball stimuli could either violate local or higher level global rules. We characterised predictive processes in individuals with Down's syndrome and their relationship with pathological ageing, with a focus on the EEG event-related potential called Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and the P300. In Down's syndrome, we also evaluated the EEG components as predictor of cognitive decline 1 year later. We found that predictive processes of detection of auditory violations are overall preserved in Down's syndrome but also that the amplitude of the MMN to local deviancies decreases with age. However, the 1-year follow-up of Down's syndrome found that none of the ERPs measures predicted subsequent cognitive decline. The present study provides a novel characterization of electrophysiological markers of local and global predictive processes in Down's syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Avancini
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Sally Jennings
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Cambridge CognitionCambridgeUK
| | | | - Valdas Noreika
- Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical SciencesQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - April Le
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Madeleine J. Walpert
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Isabel C. H. Clare
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
| | - Anthony J. Holland
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Shahid H. Zaman
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
| | - Howard Ring
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jallow M, Black G, van Os S, Baldwin DR, Brain KE, Donnelly M, Janes SM, Kurtidu C, McCutchan G, Robb KA, Ruparel M, Quaife SL. Acceptability of a standalone written leaflet for the National Health Service for England Targeted Lung Health Check Programme: A concurrent, think-aloud study. Health Expect 2022; 25:1776-1788. [PMID: 35475542 PMCID: PMC9327842 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many countries are introducing low-dose computed tomography screening programmes for people at high risk of lung cancer. Effective communication strategies that convey risks and benefits, including unfamiliar concepts and outcome probabilities based on population risk, are critical to achieving informed choice and mitigating inequalities in uptake. METHODS This study investigated the acceptability of an aspect of NHS England's communication strategy in the form of a leaflet that was used to invite and inform eligible adults about the Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) programme. Acceptability was assessed in terms of how individuals engaged with, comprehended and responded to the leaflet. Semi-structured, 'think aloud' interviews were conducted remotely with 40 UK screening-naïve current and former smokers (aged 55-73). The verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically using a coding framework based on the Dual Process Theory of cognition. RESULTS The leaflet helped participants understand the principles and procedures of screening and fostered cautiously favourable intentions. Three themes captured the main results of the data analysis: (1) Response-participants experienced anxiety about screening results and further investigations, but the involvement of specialist healthcare professionals was reassuring; (2) Engagement-participants were rapidly drawn to information about lung cancer prevalence, and benefits of screening, but deliberated slowly about early diagnosis, risks of screening and less familiar symptoms of lung cancer; (3) Comprehension-participants understood the main principles of the TLHC programme, but some were confused by its rationale and eligibility criteria. Radiation risks, abnormal screening results and numerical probabilities of screening outcomes were hard to understand. CONCLUSION The TLHC information leaflet appeared to be acceptable to the target population. There is scope to improve aspects of comprehension and engagement in ways that would support informed choice as a distributed process in lung cancer screening. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The insight and perspectives of patient representatives directly informed and improved the design and conduct of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mbasan Jallow
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Georgia Black
- Department of Applied Health ResearchUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sandra van Os
- Department of Applied Health ResearchUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - David R. Baldwin
- Department of Respiratory MedicineNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City HospitalNottinghamUK
| | - Kate E. Brain
- Division of Population MedicineCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | | | - Samuel M. Janes
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Clara Kurtidu
- Institute of Health and WellbeingUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | | | - Kathryn A. Robb
- Institute of Health and WellbeingUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Mamta Ruparel
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Samantha L. Quaife
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cox C, Ansari A, McLaughlin M, van der Scheer JW, Bousfield J, George J, Leach B, Parkinson S, Dixon‐Woods M. Mixed-methods exploration of views on choice in a university asymptomatic COVID-19 testing programme. Bioethics 2022; 36:434-444. [PMID: 35226763 PMCID: PMC9111245 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Asymptomatic COVID-19 testing programmes are being introduced in higher education institutions, but stakeholder views regarding the acceptability of mandating or incentivizing participation remain little understood. A mixed-method study (semi-structured interviews and a survey including open and closed questions) was undertaken in a case study university with a student testing programme. Survey data were analysed descriptively; analysis for interviews was based on the framework method. Two hundred and thirty-nine people participated in the study: 213 in the survey (189 students, 24 staff), and 26 in interviews (19 students, 7 staff). There was majority (62%) but not universal support for voluntary participation, with a range of concerns expressed about the potentially negative effects of mandating testing. Those who supported mandatory testing tended to do so on the grounds that it would protect others. There was also majority (64%) opposition to penalties for refusing to test. Views on restricting access to face-to-face teaching for non-participants were polarized. Three-quarters (75%) supported incentives, though there were some concerns about effectiveness and unintended consequences. Participants emphasized the importance of communication about the potential benefits of testing. Preserving the voluntariness of participation in student asymptomatic testing programmes is likely to be the most ethically sound policy unless circumstances change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitríona Cox
- THIS InstituteClifford Allbutt Building Cambridge Biomedical CampusCambridgeUK
| | - Akbar Ansari
- THIS InstituteClifford Allbutt Building Cambridge Biomedical CampusCambridgeUK
| | - Meredith McLaughlin
- THIS InstituteClifford Allbutt Building Cambridge Biomedical CampusCambridgeUK
- Homerton CollegeHomerton CollegeCambridgeUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Dixon‐Woods
- THIS InstituteClifford Allbutt Building Cambridge Biomedical CampusCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pino M, Land V. How companions speak on patients' behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a conversation analytic study of palliative care consultations. Sociol Health Illn 2022; 44:395-415. [PMID: 35157323 PMCID: PMC9306617 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Companions are individuals who support patients and attend health-care appointments with them. Several studies characterised companions' participation in broad terms, glossing over the details of how they time and design their actions, and how patients and health-care practitioners (HCPs) respond to them. This article aims to examine these aspects in detail by using conversation analysis, focusing on actions whereby companions speak on patients' behalf-mentioning delicate aspects of patients' experience (specifically, by alluding to patients' thoughts or feelings about dying). Some studies suggested that these actions undermine patients' autonomy. By contrast, through examination of palliative care consultations in a UK hospice, we found that these interventions are warranted by contextual circumstances: they are either invited by patients or HCPs (through questions or gaze) or volunteered to help with the progression of an activity (e.g. when a patient does not answer an HCP's question). Additionally, all parties collaborate in constructing these companion interventions as temporary departures from an otherwise prevailing normative orientation to patients' right to speak for themselves. The study contributes to the sociology of health and illness by characterising how companions contribute to the ways in which participants coordinate their relative rights and responsibilities, and ultimately their relationships, within health-care interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pino
- School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
| | - Victoria Land
- School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Papanicolas I, Figueroa JF. International comparison of patient care trajectories: Insights from the ICCONIC project. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1295-1298. [PMID: 34755338 PMCID: PMC8579200 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Blankart CR, van Gool K, Papanicolas I, Bernal‐Delgado E, Bowden N, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Knight H, Abiona O, Riley K, Schoenfeld AJ, Shatrov K, Wodchis WP, Figueroa JF. International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1370-1382. [PMID: 34490633 PMCID: PMC8579204 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and explore differences in spending and utilization of key health services at the end of life among hip fracture patients across seven developed countries. DATA SOURCES Individual-level claims data from the inpatient and outpatient health care sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC). STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively analyzed utilization and spending from acute hospital care, emergency department, outpatient primary care and specialty physician visits, and outpatient drugs. Patterns of spending and utilization were compared in the last 30, 90, and 180 days across Australia, Canada, England, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, and the United States. We employed linear regression models to measure age- and sex-specific effects within and across countries. In addition, we analyzed hospital-centricity, that is, the days spent in hospital and site of death. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We identified patients who sustained a hip fracture in 2016 and died within 12 months from date of admission. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Resource use, costs, and the proportion of deaths in hospital showed large variability being high in England and Spain, while low in New Zealand. Days in hospital significantly decreased with increasing age in Canada, Germany, Spain, and the United States. Hospital spending near date of death was significantly lower for women in Canada, Germany, and the United States. The age gradient and the sex effect were less pronounced in utilization and spending of emergency care, outpatient care, and drugs. CONCLUSIONS Across seven countries, we find important variations in end-of-life care for patients who sustained a hip fracture, with some differences explained by sex and age. Our work sheds important insights that may help ongoing health policy discussions on equity, efficiency, and reimbursement in health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Irene Papanicolas
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | | | - Nicholas Bowden
- Department of Women's and Children's HealthUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business School and Centre for Health Systems and TechnologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Division of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Or Z, Shatrov K, Penneau A, Wodchis W, Abiona O, Blankart CR, Bowden N, Bernal‐Delgado E, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Papanicolas I, Riley K, Pellet L, Estupiñán‐Romero F, van Gool K, Figueroa JF. Within and across country variations in treatment of patients with heart failure and diabetes. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1358-1369. [PMID: 34409601 PMCID: PMC8579197 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare within-country variation of health care utilization and spending of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and diabetes across countries. DATA SOURCES Patient-level linked data sources compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care across nine countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. DATA COLLECTION METHODS Patients were identified in routine hospital data with a primary diagnosis of CHF and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes in 2015/2016. STUDY DESIGN We calculated the care consumption of patients after a hospital admission over a year across the care pathway-ranging from primary care to home health nursing care. To compare the distribution of care consumption in each country, we use Gini coefficients, Lorenz curves, and female-male ratios for eight utilization and spending measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In all countries, rehabilitation and home nursing care were highly concentrated in the top decile of patients, while the number of drug prescriptions were more uniformly distributed. On average, the Gini coefficient for drug consumption is about 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.36), while it is, 0.50 (0.45-0.56) for primary care visits, and more than 0.75 (0.81-0.92) for rehabilitation use and nurse visits at home (0.78; 0.62-0.9). Variations in spending were more pronounced than in utilization. Compared to men, women spend more days at initial hospital admission (+5%, 1.01-1.06), have a higher number of prescriptions (+7%, 1.05-1.09), and substantially more rehabilitation and home care (+20% to 35%, 0.79-1.6, 0.99-1.64), but have fewer visits to specialists (-10%; 0.84-0.97). CONCLUSIONS Distribution of health care consumption in different settings varies within countries, but there are also some common treatment patterns across all countries. Clinicians and policy makers need to look into these differences in care utilization by sex and care setting to determine whether they are justified or indicate suboptimal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
- Department of Economics (LEDa)University Dauphine PSLParisFrance
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
- Department of Economics (LEDa)University Dauphine PSLParisFrance
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- ICESTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | | | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Leila Pellet
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lockyer B, Islam S, Rahman A, Dickerson J, Pickett K, Sheldon T, Wright J, McEachan R, Sheard L. Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expect 2021; 24:1158-1167. [PMID: 33942948 PMCID: PMC8239544 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccines can offer a route out of the pandemic, yet initial research suggests that many are unwilling to be vaccinated. A rise in the spread of misinformation is thought to have played a significant role in vaccine hesitancy. To maximize uptake, it is important to understand why misinformation has been able to take hold at this time and why it may pose a more significant problem within certain contexts. OBJECTIVE To understand people's COVID-19 beliefs, their interactions with (mis)information during COVID-19 and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccine. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS Bradford, UK, was chosen as the study site to provide evidence to local decision makers. In-depth phone interviews were carried out with 20 people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford during Autumn 2020. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Participants discussed a wide range of COVID-19 misinformation they had encountered, resulting in confusion, distress and mistrust. Vaccine hesitancy could be attributed to three prominent factors: safety concerns, negative stories and personal knowledge. The more confused, distressed and mistrusting participants felt about their social worlds during the pandemic, the less positive they were about a vaccine. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy needs to be understood in the context of the relationship between the spread of misinformation and associated emotional reactions. Vaccine programmes should provide a focused, localized and empathetic response to counter misinformation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION A rapid community and stakeholder engagement process was undertaken to identify COVID-19 priority topics important to Bradford citizens and decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Lockyer
- Bradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordUK
| | - Shahid Islam
- Bradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordUK
| | - Aamnah Rahman
- Bradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordUK
| | - Josie Dickerson
- Bradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordUK
| | - Kate Pickett
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Trevor Sheldon
- Institute of Population Health SciencesQueen Mary University LondonLondonUK
| | - John Wright
- Bradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordUK
| | - Rosemary McEachan
- Bradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordUK
| | - Laura Sheard
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gillespie H, Findlay White F, Kennedy N, Dornan T. Enhancing workplace learning at the transition into practice: Lessons from a pandemic. Med Educ 2020; 54:1186-1187. [PMID: 32418238 PMCID: PMC7276797 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
|