1
|
Blankart CR, De Gani SM, Crimlisk H, Desmedt M, Bauer B, Doyle G. Health literacy, governance and systems leadership contribute to the implementation of the One Health approach: a virtuous circle. Health Policy 2024; 143:105042. [PMID: 38518391 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
One Health is an important approach to addressing health threats and promoting health through interdisciplinary health, policy, legislation and leadership research to achieve better human and animal health and better outcomes for the planet. The Covid-19 pandemic has triggered an urgent awareness of the need to develop innovative integrative solutions to address root causes of such threats to health, which requires collaboration across disciplines and amongst different sectors and communities. We explore how achieving the Quadripartite Organizations' One Health Joint Plan of Action can be supported by the concepts of 'One Health literacy' and 'One Health governance' and promote both academic and policy dialogue. We show how One Health literacy and One Health governance influence and reinforce each other, while an interdisciplinary systems leadership approach acts as a catalyst and mechanism for understanding and enacting change. Based on our understanding of how these elements influence the implementation of the One Health approach, we describe a model for considering how external triggering events such as the Covid-19 pandemic may prompt a virtuous circle whereby exposure to and exploration of One Health issues may lead to improved One Health literacy and to better governance. We close with recommendations to international organisations, national governments and to leaders in policy, research and practice to enhance their influence on society, the planetary environment, health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 3, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Freiburgstr. 3, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; Multidisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases (MCID), University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Saskia Maria De Gani
- Careum Center for Health Literacy, Careum Foundation, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland; Careum School of Health, Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Helen Crimlisk
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Centre Court, Atlas Way, Sheffield S47QQ, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Rd, Sheffield S102RX, United Kingdom; Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot St, London E18BB, United Kingdom
| | - Mario Desmedt
- Swiss Nurse Leaders, Haus der Akademien, Laupenstrasse 7, P.O. Box, 3001 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Bauer
- Data Saves Lives Germany, c/o european digital health academy gGmbH, Mohnblumenweg 1, 93326 Abensberg, Germany
| | - Gerardine Doyle
- UCD College of Business, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iskrov G, Raycheva R, Kostadinov K, Gillner S, Blankart CR, Gross ES, Gumus G, Mitova E, Stefanov S, Stefanov G, Stefanov R. Are the European reference networks for rare diseases ready to embrace machine learning? A mixed-methods study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:25. [PMID: 38273306 PMCID: PMC10809751 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03047-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The delay in diagnosis for rare disease (RD) patients is often longer than for patients with common diseases. Machine learning (ML) technologies have the potential to speed up and increase the precision of diagnosis in this population group. We aim to explore the expectations and experiences of the members of the European Reference Networks (ERNs) for RDs with those technologies and their potential for application. METHODS We used a mixed-methods approach with an online survey followed by a focus group discussion. Our study targeted primarily medical professionals but also other individuals affiliated with any of the 24 ERNs. RESULTS The online survey yielded 423 responses from ERN members. Participants reported a limited degree of knowledge of and experience with ML technologies. They considered improved diagnostic accuracy the most important potential benefit, closely followed by the synthesis of clinical information, and indicated the lack of training in these new technologies, which hinders adoption and implementation in routine care. Most respondents supported the option that ML should be an optional but recommended part of the diagnostic process for RDs. Most ERN members saw the use of ML limited to specialised units only in the next 5 years, where those technologies should be funded by public sources. Focus group discussions concluded that the potential of ML technologies is substantial and confirmed that the technologies will have an important impact on healthcare and RDs in particular. As ML technologies are not the core competency of health care professionals, participants deemed a close collaboration with developers necessary to ensure that results are valid and reliable. However, based on our results, we call for more research to understand other stakeholders' opinions and expectations, including the views of patient organisations. CONCLUSIONS We found enthusiasm to implement and apply ML technologies, especially diagnostic tools in the field of RDs, despite the perceived lack of experience. Early dialogue and collaboration between health care professionals, developers, industry, policymakers, and patient associations seem to be crucial to building trust, improving performance, and ultimately increasing the willingness to accept diagnostics based on ML technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgi Iskrov
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15A Vasil Aprilov Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
| | - Ralitsa Raycheva
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15A Vasil Aprilov Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Kostadin Kostadinov
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15A Vasil Aprilov Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Sandra Gillner
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 3, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (Sitem-Insel), Freiburgstr. 3, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 3, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (Sitem-Insel), Freiburgstr. 3, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Edith Sky Gross
- EURORDIS - Rare Diseases Europe, 96 Rue Didot, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Gulcin Gumus
- EURORDIS - Rare Diseases Europe, 96 Rue Didot, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Elena Mitova
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Stefan Stefanov
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Department of Epidemiology and Disaster Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 15A Vasil Aprilov Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Georgi Stefanov
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Rumen Stefanov
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15A Vasil Aprilov Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garnier N, Berghout J, Zygmunt A, Singh D, Huang KA, Kantz W, Blankart CR, Gillner S, Zhao J, Roettger R, Saier C, Kirschner J, Schenk J, Atkins L, Ryan N, Zarakowska K, Zschüntzsch J, Zuccolo M, Müllenborn M, Man YS, Goodman L, Trad M, Chalandon AS, Sansen S, Martinez-Fresno M, Badger S, Walther van Olden R, Rothmann R, Lehner P, Tschohl C, Baillon L, Gumus G, Gross E, Stefanov R, Iskrov G, Raycheva R, Kostadinov K, Mitova E, Einhorn M, Einhorn Y, Schepers J, Hübner M, Alves F, Iskandar R, Mayer R, Renieri A, Piperkova A, Gut I, Beltran S, Matthiesen ME, Poetz M, Hansson M, Trollmann R, Agolini E, Ottombrino S, Novelli A, Bertini E, Selvatici R, Farnè M, Fortunato F, Ferlini A. Genetic newborn screening and digital technologies: A project protocol based on a dual approach to shorten the rare diseases diagnostic path in Europe. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293503. [PMID: 37992053 PMCID: PMC10664952 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Since 72% of rare diseases are genetic in origin and mostly paediatrics, genetic newborn screening represents a diagnostic "window of opportunity". Therefore, many gNBS initiatives started in different European countries. Screen4Care is a research project, which resulted of a joint effort between the European Union Commission and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. It focuses on genetic newborn screening and artificial intelligence-based tools which will be applied to a large European population of about 25.000 infants. The neonatal screening strategy will be based on targeted sequencing, while whole genome sequencing will be offered to all enrolled infants who may show early symptoms but have resulted negative at the targeted sequencing-based newborn screening. We will leverage artificial intelligence-based algorithms to identify patients using Electronic Health Records (EHR) and to build a repository "symptom checkers" for patients and healthcare providers. S4C will design an equitable, ethical, and sustainable framework for genetic newborn screening and new digital tools, corroborated by a large workout where legal, ethical, and social complexities will be addressed with the intent of making the framework highly and flexibly translatable into the diverse European health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Garnier
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Joanne Berghout
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Aldona Zygmunt
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Deependra Singh
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Kui A. Huang
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Waltraud Kantz
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management and Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Gillner
- KPM Center for Public Management and Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jiawei Zhao
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Richard Roettger
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christina Saier
- Department of Neuropediatric and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Kirschner
- Department of Neuropediatric and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joern Schenk
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, Switzerland
| | - Leon Atkins
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, Switzerland
| | - Nuala Ryan
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, Switzerland
| | - Kaja Zarakowska
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, Switzerland
| | - Jana Zschüntzsch
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Yuen-Sum Man
- Novo Nordisk Health Care AG, Switzerland &Novo Nordisk A/S, Kloten, Denmark
| | - Liz Goodman
- University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Rothmann
- Research Institute AG & Co KG, Digital Human Rights Center, Wien, Austria
| | - Patrick Lehner
- Research Institute AG & Co KG, Digital Human Rights Center, Wien, Austria
| | - Christof Tschohl
- Research Institute AG & Co KG, Digital Human Rights Center, Wien, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Rumen Stefanov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Bulgarian Association for Promotion of Education and Science, Institute for Rare Disease, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Bulgarian Association for Promotion of Education and Science, Institute for Rare Disease, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Ralitsa Raycheva
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Bulgarian Association for Promotion of Education and Science, Institute for Rare Disease, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Kostadin Kostadinov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Bulgarian Association for Promotion of Education and Science, Institute for Rare Disease, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Elena Mitova
- Bulgarian Association for Promotion of Education and Science, Institute for Rare Disease, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | | | - Josef Schepers
- Berlin Institute of Health (at) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miriam Hübner
- Berlin Institute of Health (at) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frauke Alves
- Translational Molecular Imaging, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
- Clinic of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rowan Iskandar
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Aneta Piperkova
- Bulgarian Association for Personalized Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ivo Gut
- Centro Nacional de Analisis Genomico, CNAG, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Beltran
- Centro Nacional de Analisis Genomico, CNAG, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marion Poetz
- Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rita Selvatici
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marianna Farnè
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Fernanda Fortunato
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ferlini
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meggiolaro A, Blankart CR, Stargardt T, Schreyögg J. An econometric approach to aggregating multiple cardiovascular outcomes in German hospitals. Eur J Health Econ 2023; 24:785-802. [PMID: 36112269 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01509-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Development of an aggregate quality index to evaluate hospital performance in cardiovascular events treatment. METHODS We applied a two-stage regression approach using an accelerated failure time model based on variance weights to estimate hospital quality over four cardiovascular interventions: elective coronary bypass graft, elective cardiac resynchronization therapy, and emergency treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Mortality and readmissions were used as outcomes. For the estimation we used data from a statutory health insurer in Germany from 2005 to 2016. RESULTS The precision-based weights calculated in the first stage were higher for mortality than for readmissions. In general, teaching hospitals performed better in our ranking of hospital quality compared to non-teaching hospitals, as did private not-for-profit hospitals compared to hospitals with public or private for-profit ownership. DISCUSSION The proposed approach is a new method to aggregate single hospital quality outcomes using objective, precision-based weights. Likelihood-based accelerated failure time models make use of existing data more efficiently compared to widely used models relying on dichotomized data. The main advantage of the variance-based weights approach is that the extent to which an indicator contributes to the aggregate index depends on the amount of its variance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Meggiolaro
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tom Stargardt
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Blankart CR, Shatrov K, Wodchis W, Janlov N, Figueroa JF, Bowden N, Bernal-Delgado E, Papanicolas I. Why the US spends more treating high-need high-cost patients: a comparative study of pricing and utilization of care in six high-income countries. Health Policy 2023; 128:55-61. [PMID: 36529552 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
One of the most pressing challenges facing most health care systems is rising costs. As the population ages and the demand for health care services grows, there is a growing need to understand the drivers of these costs across systems. This paper attempts to address this gap by examining utilization and spending of the course of a year for two specific high-need high-cost patient types: a frail older person with a hip fracture and an older person with congestive heart failure and diabetes. Data on utilization and expenditure is collected across five health care settings (hospital, post-acute rehabilitation, primary care, outpatient specialty and drugs), in six countries (Canada (Ontario), France, Germany, Spain (Aragon), Sweden and the United States (fee for service Medicare) and used to construct treatment episode Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) that compare prices using baskets of goods from the different care settings. The treatment episode PPPs suggest other countries have more similar volumes of care to the US as compared to other standardization approaches, suggesting that US prices account for more of the differential in US health care expenditures. The US also differs with regards to the share of expenditures across care settings, with post-acute rehab and outpatient speciality expenditures accounting for a larger share of the total relative to comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Lorenzoni
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France
| | - Alberto Marino
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES), Paris, France
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jose F Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| | | | - Irene Papanicolas
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quentin W, Achstetter K, Barros PP, Blankart CR, Fattore G, Jeurissen P, Kwon S, Laba T, Or Z, Papanicolas I, Polin K, Shuftan N, Sutherland J, Vogt V, Vrangbaek K, Wendt C. Health Policy - the best evidence for better policies. Health Policy 2023; 127:1-4. [PMID: 36669897 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wilm Quentin
- Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Belgium, Brussels
| | - Katharina Achstetter
- Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Fattore
- Department of Social and Political Sciences and CERGAS SDA, Università Bocconi, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Soonman Kwon
- Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Korea (the Republic of)
| | | | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics, IRDES, Paris, France
| | - Irene Papanicolas
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Katherine Polin
- Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Belgium, Brussels
| | - Nathan Shuftan
- Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Belgium, Brussels
| | - Jason Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Verena Vogt
- Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karsten Vrangbaek
- Section of Health Services Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Drummond M, Federici C, Reckers‐Droog V, Torbica A, Blankart CR, Ciani O, Kaló Z, Kovács S, Brouwer W. Coverage with evidence development for medical devices in Europe: Can practice meet theory? Health Econ 2022; 31 Suppl 1:179-194. [PMID: 35220644 PMCID: PMC9545598 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Health economists have written extensively on the design and implementation of coverage with evidence development (CED) schemes and have proposed theoretical frameworks based on cost-effectiveness modeling and value of information analysis. CED may aid decision-makers when there is uncertainty about the (cost-)effectiveness of a new health technology at the time of reimbursement. Medical devices are potential candidates for CED schemes, as regulatory regimes do not usually require the same level of efficacy and safety data normally needed for pharmaceuticals. The purpose of this research is to assess whether the actual practice of CED for medical devices in Europe meets the theoretical principles proposed by health economists and whether theory and practice can be more closely aligned. Based on decision-makers' perceptions of the challenges associated with CED schemes, plus examples from the schemes themselves, we discuss a series of proposals for assessing the desirability of schemes, their design, implementation, and evaluation. These proposals, while reflecting the practical challenges with developing CED programs, embody many of the principles suggested by economists and should support decision-makers in dealing with uncertainty about the real-world performance of devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlo Federici
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS)Universitá BocconiMilanItaly
- School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Vivian Reckers‐Droog
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Aleksandra Torbica
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS)Universitá BocconiMilanItaly
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Kompetenzzentrum für Public ManagementUniversität BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS)Universitá BocconiMilanItaly
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research InstituteBudapestHungary
- Centre for Health Technology AssessmentSemmelweis UniversityBudapestHungary
| | | | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Erasmus School of EconomicsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Iskandar R, Federici C, Berns C, Blankart CR. An approach to quantify parameter uncertainty in early assessment of novel health technologies. Health Econ 2022; 31 Suppl 1:116-134. [PMID: 35581685 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Health economic modeling of novel technology at the early stages of a product lifecycle has been used to identify technologies that are likely to be cost-effective. Such early assessments are challenging due to the potentially limited amount of data. Modelers typically conduct uncertainty analyses to evaluate their effect on decision-relevant outcomes. Current approaches, however, are limited in their scope of application and imposes an unverifiable assumption, that is, uncertainty can be precisely represented by a probability distribution. In the absence of reliable data, an approach that uses the fewest number of assumptions is desirable. This study introduces a generalized approach for quantifying parameter uncertainty, that is, probability bound analysis (PBA), that does not require a precise specification of a probability distribution in the context of early-stage health economic modeling. We introduce the concept of a probability box (p-box) as a measure of uncertainty without necessitating a precise probability distribution. We provide formulas for a p-box given data on summary statistics of a parameter. We describe an approach to propagate p-boxes into a model and provide step-by-step guidance on how to implement PBA. We conduct a case and examine the differences between the status-quo and PBA approaches and their potential implications on decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan Iskandar
- Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, & Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Center of Excellence in Decision-Analytic Modeling and Health Economics Research, Sitem-insel, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carlo Federici
- SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy
| | - Cassandra Berns
- Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, & Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Center of Excellence in Decision-Analytic Modeling and Health Economics Research, Sitem-insel, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Center of Excellence in Decision-Analytic Modeling and Health Economics Research, Sitem-insel, Bern, Switzerland
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Milstein R, Shatrov K, Schmutz LM, Blankart CR. How to Pay Primary Care Physicians for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations: An analysis of 43 EU and OECD Countries. Health Policy 2022; 126:485-492. [PMID: 35367056 PMCID: PMC8934248 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Vaccinations are crucial to fighting SARS-CoV-2, and high coverage rates can in most countries probably only be achieved with the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs). We aimed to explore how SARS-CoV-2 vaccination payment schemes in 43 countries differ with regard to the (i) type of payment scheme, (ii) amount paid, (iii) degree of bundling, and (iv) use of pay-for-performance elements. We collected information on payments and health system characteristics, such as PCP income and employment status, in all EU and OECD countries over time. We regressed the payment amount on the income of PCPs for countries with activity-dependent schemes using a linear regression (OLS), and we interpreted the residuals of this regression as a vaccination payment index. The majority of countries (30/43) had chosen payment schemes that reward PCPs for the activity they perform. Seventeen countries paid less per vaccination than the income-adjusted average, whereas 13 countries paid more. Twelve countries used pay-for-performance elements.
Collapse
|
10
|
Blankart CR, van Gool K, Papanicolas I, Bernal‐Delgado E, Bowden N, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Knight H, Abiona O, Riley K, Schoenfeld AJ, Shatrov K, Wodchis WP, Figueroa JF. International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1370-1382. [PMID: 34490633 PMCID: PMC8579204 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and explore differences in spending and utilization of key health services at the end of life among hip fracture patients across seven developed countries. DATA SOURCES Individual-level claims data from the inpatient and outpatient health care sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC). STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively analyzed utilization and spending from acute hospital care, emergency department, outpatient primary care and specialty physician visits, and outpatient drugs. Patterns of spending and utilization were compared in the last 30, 90, and 180 days across Australia, Canada, England, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, and the United States. We employed linear regression models to measure age- and sex-specific effects within and across countries. In addition, we analyzed hospital-centricity, that is, the days spent in hospital and site of death. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We identified patients who sustained a hip fracture in 2016 and died within 12 months from date of admission. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Resource use, costs, and the proportion of deaths in hospital showed large variability being high in England and Spain, while low in New Zealand. Days in hospital significantly decreased with increasing age in Canada, Germany, Spain, and the United States. Hospital spending near date of death was significantly lower for women in Canada, Germany, and the United States. The age gradient and the sex effect were less pronounced in utilization and spending of emergency care, outpatient care, and drugs. CONCLUSIONS Across seven countries, we find important variations in end-of-life care for patients who sustained a hip fracture, with some differences explained by sex and age. Our work sheds important insights that may help ongoing health policy discussions on equity, efficiency, and reimbursement in health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Irene Papanicolas
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | | | - Nicholas Bowden
- Department of Women's and Children's HealthUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business School and Centre for Health Systems and TechnologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Division of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Papanicolas I, Figueroa JF, Schoenfeld AJ, Riley K, Abiona O, Arvin M, Atsma F, Bernal‐Delgado E, Bowden N, Blankart CR, Deeny S, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Haywood P, Janlov N, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Penneau A, Shatrov K, Stafford M, van de Galien O, van Gool K, Wodchis W, Jha AK. Differences in health care spending and utilization among older frail adults in high-income countries: ICCONIC hip fracture persona. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1335-1346. [PMID: 34390254 PMCID: PMC8579209 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explores differences in spending and utilization of health care services for an older person with frailty before and after a hip fracture. DATA SOURCES We used individual-level patient data from five care settings. STUDY DESIGN We compared utilization and spending of an older person aged older than 65 years for 365 days before and after a hip fracture across 11 countries and five domains of care as follows: acute hospital care, primary care, outpatient specialty care, post-acute rehabilitative care, and outpatient drugs. Utilization and spending were age and sex standardized.. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS The data were compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) across 11 countries as follows: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The sample ranged from 1859 patients in Spain to 42,849 in France. Mean age ranged from 81.2 in Switzerland to 84.7 in Australia. The majority of patients across countries were female. Relative to other countries, the United States had the lowest inpatient length of stay (11.3), but the highest number of days were spent in post-acute care rehab (100.7) and, on average, had more visits to specialist providers (6.8 per year) than primary care providers (4.0 per year). Across almost all sectors, the United States spent more per person than other countries per unit ($13,622 per hospitalization, $233 per primary care visit, $386 per MD specialist visit). Patients also had high expenditures in the year prior to the hip fracture, mostly concentrated in the inpatient setting. CONCLUSION Across 11 high-income countries, there is substantial variation in health care spending and utilization for an older person with frailty, both before and after a hip fracture. The United States is the most expensive country due to high prices and above average utilization of post-acute rehab care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Mina Arvin
- Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | | | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business SchoolUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services AnalysisStockholmSweden
| | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Ashish K. Jha
- Brown School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Or Z, Shatrov K, Penneau A, Wodchis W, Abiona O, Blankart CR, Bowden N, Bernal‐Delgado E, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Papanicolas I, Riley K, Pellet L, Estupiñán‐Romero F, van Gool K, Figueroa JF. Within and across country variations in treatment of patients with heart failure and diabetes. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1358-1369. [PMID: 34409601 PMCID: PMC8579197 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare within-country variation of health care utilization and spending of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and diabetes across countries. DATA SOURCES Patient-level linked data sources compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care across nine countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. DATA COLLECTION METHODS Patients were identified in routine hospital data with a primary diagnosis of CHF and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes in 2015/2016. STUDY DESIGN We calculated the care consumption of patients after a hospital admission over a year across the care pathway-ranging from primary care to home health nursing care. To compare the distribution of care consumption in each country, we use Gini coefficients, Lorenz curves, and female-male ratios for eight utilization and spending measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In all countries, rehabilitation and home nursing care were highly concentrated in the top decile of patients, while the number of drug prescriptions were more uniformly distributed. On average, the Gini coefficient for drug consumption is about 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.36), while it is, 0.50 (0.45-0.56) for primary care visits, and more than 0.75 (0.81-0.92) for rehabilitation use and nurse visits at home (0.78; 0.62-0.9). Variations in spending were more pronounced than in utilization. Compared to men, women spend more days at initial hospital admission (+5%, 1.01-1.06), have a higher number of prescriptions (+7%, 1.05-1.09), and substantially more rehabilitation and home care (+20% to 35%, 0.79-1.6, 0.99-1.64), but have fewer visits to specialists (-10%; 0.84-0.97). CONCLUSIONS Distribution of health care consumption in different settings varies within countries, but there are also some common treatment patterns across all countries. Clinicians and policy makers need to look into these differences in care utilization by sex and care setting to determine whether they are justified or indicate suboptimal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
- Department of Economics (LEDa)University Dauphine PSLParisFrance
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
- Department of Economics (LEDa)University Dauphine PSLParisFrance
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- ICESTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | | | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Leila Pellet
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Figueroa JF, Papanicolas I, Riley K, Abiona O, Arvin M, Atsma F, Bernal‐Delgado E, Bowden N, Blankart CR, Deeny S, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Haywood P, Janlov N, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Penneau A, Shatrov K, van de Galien O, van Gool K, Wodchis W, Jha AK. International comparison of health spending and utilization among people with complex multimorbidity. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1317-1334. [PMID: 34350586 PMCID: PMC8579210 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore cross-country differences in spending and utilization across different domains of care for a multimorbid persona with heart failure and diabetes. DATA SOURCES We used individual-level administrative claims or registry data from inpatient and outpatient health care sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) across 11 countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States (US). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Data collected by ICCONIC partners. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively analyzed age-sex standardized utilization and spending of an older person (65-90 years) hospitalized with a heart failure exacerbation and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes across five domains of care: hospital care, primary care, outpatient specialty care, post-acute rehabilitative care, and outpatient drugs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Sample sizes ranged from n = 1270 in Spain to n = 21,803 in the United States. Mean age (standard deviation [SD]) ranged from 76.2 (5.6) in the Netherlands to 80.3 (6.8) in Sweden. We observed substantial variation in spending and utilization across care settings. On average, England spent $10,956 per person in hospital care while the United States spent $30,877. The United States had a shorter length of stay over the year (18.9 days) compared to France (32.9) and Germany (33.4). The United States spent more days in facility-based rehabilitative care than other countries. Australia spent $421 per person in primary care, while Spain (Aragon) spent $1557. The United States and Canada had proportionately more visits to specialist providers than primary care providers. Across almost all sectors, the United States spent more than other countries, suggesting higher prices per unit. CONCLUSION Across 11 countries, there is substantial variation in health care spending and utilization for a complex multimorbid persona with heart failure and diabetes. Drivers of spending vary across countries, with the United States being the most expensive country due to high prices and higher use of facility-based rehabilitative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mina Arvin
- Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | | | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business SchoolUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services AnalysisStockholmSweden
| | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Ashish K. Jha
- Brown School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Duminy L, Sivapragasam NR, Matchar DB, Visaria A, Ansah JP, Blankart CR, Schoenenberger L. Validation and application of a needs-based segmentation tool for cross-country comparisons. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1394-1404. [PMID: 34755337 PMCID: PMC8579203 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare countries' health care needs by segmenting populations into a set of needs-based health states. DATA SOURCES We used seven waves of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) panel survey data. STUDY DESIGN We developed the Cross-Country Simple Segmentation Tool (CCSST), a validated clinician-administered instrument for categorizing older individuals by distinct, homogeneous health and related social service needs. Using clinical indicators, self-reported physician diagnosis of chronic disease, and performance-based tests conducted during the survey interview, individuals were assigned to 1-5 global impressions (GI) segments and assessed for having any of the four identifiable complicating factors (CFs). We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the risk of mortality by segment. First, we show the segmentation cross-sectionally to assess cross-country differences in the fraction of individuals with different levels of medical needs. Second, we compare the differences in the rate at which individuals transition between those levels and death. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We segmented 270,208 observations (from Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland) from 96,396 individuals into GI and CF categories. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The CCSST is a valid tool for segmenting populations into needs-based states, showing Switzerland with the lowest fraction of individuals in high medical needs segments, followed by Denmark and Sweden, and Poland with the highest fraction, followed by Italy and Israel. Comparing hazard ratios of transitioning between health states may help identify country-specific areas for analysis of ecological and cultural risk factors. CONCLUSIONS The CCSST is an innovative tool for aggregate cross-country comparisons of both health needs and transitions between them. A cross-country comparison gives policy makers an effective means of comparing national health system performance and provides targeted guidance on how to identify strategies for curbing the rise of high-need, high-cost patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lize Duminy
- Institute for Health Policy and Health EconomicsBern University of Applied SciencesBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Nirmali Ruth Sivapragasam
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research ServiceDuke‐NUS Medical School SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - David Bruce Matchar
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research ServiceDuke‐NUS Medical School SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Duke University Medical CenterDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Abhijit Visaria
- Centre for Ageing Research and EducationDuke‐NUS Medical School SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - John Pastor Ansah
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research ServiceDuke‐NUS Medical School SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Lukas Schoenenberger
- Institute for Health Policy and Health EconomicsBern University of Applied SciencesBernSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Papanicolas I, Riley K, Abiona O, Arvin M, Atsma F, Bernal‐Delgado E, Bowden N, Blankart CR, Deeny S, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Haywood P, Janlov N, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Penneau A, Schoenfeld AJ, Shatrov K, Stafford M, van de Galien O, van Gool K, Wodchis W, Jha AK, Figueroa JF. Differences in health outcomes for high-need high-cost patients across high-income countries. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1347-1357. [PMID: 34378796 PMCID: PMC8579207 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explores variations in outcomes of care for two types of patient personas-an older frail person recovering from a hip fracture and a multimorbid older patient with congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes. DATA SOURCES We used individual-level patient data from 11 health systems. STUDY DESIGN We compared inpatient mortality, mortality, and readmission rates at 30, 90, and 365 days. For the hip fracture persona, we also calculated time to surgery. Outcomes were standardized by age and sex. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Data was compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes and Needs in Care across 11 countries for the years 2016-2017 (or nearest): Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The hip sample across ranged from 1859 patients in Aragon, Spain, to 42,849 in France. Mean age ranged from 81.2 in Switzerland to 84.7 in Australia, and the majority of hip patients across countries were female. The congestive heart failure (CHF) sample ranged from 742 patients in England to 21,803 in the United States. Mean age ranged from 77.2 in the United States to 80.3 in Sweden, and the majority of CHF patients were males. Average in-hospital mortality across countries was 4.1%. for the hip persona and 6.3% for the CHF persona. At the year mark, the mean mortality across all countries was 25.3% for the hip persona and 32.7% for CHF persona. Across both patient types, England reported the highest mortality at 1 year followed by the United States. Readmission rates for all periods were higher for the CHF persona than the hip persona. At 30 days, the average readmission rate for the hip persona was 13.8% and 27.6% for the CHF persona. CONCLUSION Across 11 countries, there are meaningful differences in health system outcomes for two types of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Mina Arvin
- Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinOtagoNew Zealand
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | | | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business SchoolUniversity of OtagoDunedinOtagoNew Zealand
| | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services AnalysisStockholmSweden
| | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Ashish K. Jha
- Brown School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Figueroa JF, Horneffer KE, Riley K, Abiona O, Arvin M, Atsma F, Bernal‐Delgado E, Blankart CR, Bowden N, Deeny S, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Hansen TM, Haywood P, Janlov N, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Pellet L, Orlander D, Penneau A, Schoenfeld AJ, Shatrov K, Skudal KE, Stafford M, van de Galien O, van Gool K, Wodchis WP, Tanke M, Jha AK, Papanicolas I. A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1302-1316. [PMID: 34755334 PMCID: PMC8579201 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish a methodological approach to compare two high-need, high-cost (HNHC) patient personas internationally. DATA SOURCES Linked individual-level administrative data from the inpatient and outpatient sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) across 11 countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. STUDY DESIGN We outline a methodological approach to identify HNHC patient types for international comparisons that reflect complex, priority populations defined by the National Academy of Medicine. We define two patient profiles using accessible patient-level datasets linked across different domains of care-hospital care, primary care, outpatient specialty care, post-acute rehabilitative care, long-term care, home-health care, and outpatient drugs. The personas include a frail older adult with a hip fracture with subsequent hip replacement and an older person with complex multimorbidity, including heart failure and diabetes. We demonstrate their comparability by examining the characteristics and clinical diagnoses captured across countries. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Data collected by ICCONIC partners. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Across 11 countries, the identification of HNHC patient personas was feasible to examine variations in healthcare utilization, spending, and patient outcomes. The ability of countries to examine linked, individual-level data varied, with the Netherlands, Canada, and Germany able to comprehensively examine care across all seven domains, whereas other countries such as England, Switzerland, and New Zealand were more limited. All countries were able to identify a hip fracture persona and a heart failure persona. Patient characteristics were reassuringly similar across countries. CONCLUSION Although there are cross-country differences in the availability and structure of data sources, countries had the ability to effectively identify comparable HNHC personas for international study. This work serves as the methodological paper for six accompanying papers examining differences in spending, utilization, and outcomes for these personas across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kathryn E. Horneffer
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Mina Arvin
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business SchoolUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services AnalysisStockholmSweden
| | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Leila Pellet
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Duncan Orlander
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | | | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
| | - Marit Tanke
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Ashish K. Jha
- Brown School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wodchis WP, Or Z, Blankart CR, Atsma F, Janlov N, Bai YQ, Penneau A, Arvin M, Knight H, Riley K, Figueroa JF, Papanicolas I. An international comparison of long-term care trajectories and spending following hip fracture. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1383-1393. [PMID: 34378190 PMCID: PMC8579202 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study are to compare the relative use of different postacute care settings in different countries and to compare three important outcomes as follows: total expenditure, total days of care in different care settings, and overall longevity over a 1-year period following a hip fracture. DATA SOURCES We used administrative data from hospitals, institutional and home-based long-term care (LTC), physician visits, and medications compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) from five countries as follows: Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS Data were extracted from existing administrative data systems in each participating country. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study of all individuals admitted to acute care for hip fracture. Descriptive comparisons were used to examine aggregate institutional and home-based postacute care. Care trajectories were created to track sequential care settings after acute-care discharge through institutional and community-based care in three countries where detailed information allowed. Comparisons in patient characteristics, utilization, and costs were made across these trajectories and countries. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Across five countries with complete LTC data, we found notable variations with Germany having the highest days of home-based services with relatively low costs, while Sweden incurred the highest overall expenditures. Comparisons of trajectories found that France had the highest use of inpatient rehabilitation. Germany was most likely to discharge hip fracture patients to home. Over 365 days, France averaged the highest number of days in institution with 104, Canada followed at 94, and Germany had just 87 days of institutional care on average. CONCLUSION In this comparison of LTC services following a hip fracture, we found international differences in total use of institutional and noninstitutional care, longevity, and total expenditures. There exist opportunities to organize postacute care differently to maximize independence and mitigate costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better HealthTrillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- ICESTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
- Department of Economics (LEDa)University Dauphine PSLParisFrance
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Femke Atsma
- Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services AnalysisStockholmSweden
| | - Yu Qing Bai
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- ICESTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
- Department of Economics (LEDa)University Dauphine PSLParisFrance
| | - Mina Arvin
- Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shatrov K, Pessina C, Huber K, Thomet B, Gutzeit A, Blankart CR. Improving health care from the bottom up: Factors for the successful implementation of kaizen in acute care hospitals. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257412. [PMID: 34506604 PMCID: PMC8432859 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kaizen-a management technique increasingly employed in health care-enables employees, regardless of their hierarchy level, to contribute to the improvement of their organization. The approach puts special emphasis on frontline employees because it represents one of their main opportunities to participate directly in decision making. In this study, we aimed to (1) understand the experiences of nurses in two hospitals that had recently implemented kaizen, and (2) identify factors affecting the implementation of the technique. METHODS By means of purposeful sampling, we selected 30 nurses from different units in two private acute care hospitals in Switzerland in May 2018. We used the Organizational Transformation Model to conduct semi-structured interviews and perform qualitative content analysis. Lastly, originating from Herzberg's motivation theory, we suggest two types of factor influencing the implementation of kaizen-hygiene factors that may prevent nurses from getting demotivated, and motivational factors that may boost their motivation. RESULTS Nurses generally experienced kaizen as a positive practice that enabled them to discuss work-related activities in a more comprehensive manner. In some cases, however, a lack of visible improvement in the workplace lowered nurses' motivation to make suggestions. Nurses' attitudes towards kaizen differed across both hospitals depending on the available managerial support, resources such as infrastructure and staffing levels. CONCLUSIONS From our findings, we derived several coping strategies to help health practitioners implement kaizen for the benefit of their organization and employees: Strong managerial support, appropriate use of kaizen tools, and a greater sense of team cohesion, among other factors, can influence how effectively hospital teams implement kaizen. To reap the benefits of kaizen, hospital managers should promote the exchange of opinions across hierarchy levels, allocate the necessary resources in terms of personnel and infrastructure, and show nurses how the technique can help them improve their workplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Camilla Pessina
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kaspar Huber
- Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Andreas Gutzeit
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Breast Center St. Anna, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Blankart CR, Dams F, Penton H, Kaló Z, Zemplényi A, Shatrov K, Iskandar R, Federici C. Regulatory and HTA early dialogues in medical devices. Health Policy 2021; 125:1322-1329. [PMID: 34353636 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Specific guidance and examples for health technology assessment (HTA) of medical devices are scarce in medical device development. A more intense dialogue of competent authorities, HTA agencies, and manufactures may improve evidence base on clinical and cost-effectiveness. Especially as the new Medical Device Regulation requires more clinical evidence. METHODS We explore the perceptions of manufacturers, competent authorities, and HTA agencies towards such dialogues and investigate how they should be designed to accelerate the translational process from development to patient access using semi-structured interviews. We synthesized the evidence from manufacturers, competent authorities, and HTA agencies from 14 different jurisdictions across Europe. RESULTS Eleven HTA agencies, four competent authorities, and eight manufacturers of high-risk devices expressed perceptions on the current situation and the expected development of three types of early dialogues. DISCUSSION The MDR has to be taken into account when designing the early dialogue processes. Transferring insights from medicinal product regulation is limited as the regulatory pathways differ substantially. CONCLUSION Early dialogues promise to accelerate the translational process and to provide faster access to innovative medical devices. However, health policy-makers should promote and fully establish regulatory and HTA early dialogues before introducing parallel early dialogues of regulatory, HTA agencies, and manufacturers. For initiating change, the legislator must create the legal basis and set the appropriate incentives for manufacturers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Florian Dams
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Hannah Penton
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Antal Zemplényi
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Rowan Iskandar
- Center of Excellence in Decision-Analytic Modeling and Health Economics Research (CoE DAMHER), Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Carlo Federici
- Center for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy; School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Daubner-Bendes R, Kovács S, Niewada M, Huic M, Drummond M, Ciani O, Blankart CR, Mandrik O, Torbica A, Yfantopoulos J, Petrova G, Holownia-Voloskova M, Taylor RS, Al M, Piniazhko O, Lorenzovici L, Tarricone R, Zemplényi A, Kaló Z. Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges. Front Public Health 2021; 8:612410. [PMID: 33490024 PMCID: PMC7820783 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Methodological challenges in the evaluation of medical devices (MDs) may be different for early and late technology adopter countries, as well as the potential health technology assessment (HTA) solutions to tackle them. This study aims to provide guidance to Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries on how to address key challenges of HTA for MDs with special focus on the transferability of scientific evidence. Methods: As part of the COMED Horizon 2020 project, a comprehensive list of issues related to MD HTA were identified based on a targeted literature review. Health technology assessment issues which pose a greater challenge or require different solutions in late technology adopter countries were selected. Draught recommendations to address these issues were developed and discussed in a focus group. The recommendations were then validated with a wider group of experts, including HTA and reimbursement decision makers from CEE countries in May and June 2020. Results: A consolidated list of 11 recommendations were developed in 3 major areas: (1) clinical value assessment, focusing on the use of joint EU work, relying on real-world evidence, use of coverage with evidence development schemes, transferring evidence from foreign countries and addressing the challenges of learning curve and centre effect; (2) economic value assessment, covering cost calculation of complex medical devices and transferability of economic evaluations of MDs; (3) HTA processes, related to the frequent product modifications and various indications of MDs. Conclusions: Central and Eastern European countries with limited resources for conducting HTA, can benefit from HTA methods and evidence generated in early technology adopter countries. Considering the appropriate reuse of international HTA materials, late technology adopter countries can still implement HTA, even for MDs, which have a more limited evidence base compared with pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sándor Kovács
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.,Centre for Health Technology Assessment, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Maciej Niewada
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Michael Drummond
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.,Evidence Synthesis and Modelling for Health Improvement, College of Medicine and Health, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,sitem-insel AG, Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olena Mandrik
- School of Health and Related Research, Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Aleksandra Torbica
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.,Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - John Yfantopoulos
- School of Economics and Political Science, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Guenka Petrova
- Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Malwina Holownia-Voloskova
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.,Health Technology Assessment Department, State Budgetary Institution "Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department", Moscow, Russia
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Evidence Synthesis and Modelling for Health Improvement, College of Medicine and Health, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.,MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Maiwenn Al
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Oresta Piniazhko
- HTA Department of State Expert Centre of Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - László Lorenzovici
- G. E. Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, Tirgu Mures, Romania.,Syreon Research Romania, Tirgu Mures, Romania
| | - Rosanna Tarricone
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.,Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antal Zemplényi
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.,Division of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.,Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
von Kodolitsch Y, Prokoph M, Sachweh A, Kölbel T, Detter C, Berger J, Wick T, Debus S, Blankart CR. How military history can inspire medical intervention. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2021; 10:2048-2053. [PMID: 33381443 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.03.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yskert von Kodolitsch
- German Aorta Center Hamburg at the University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Prokoph
- German Bundeswehr, US Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS, USA
| | - Arnim Sachweh
- German Aorta Center Hamburg at the University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aorta Center Hamburg at the University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Detter
- German Aorta Center Hamburg at the University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Berger
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wick
- Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Applied Mathematics (IfAM), Hannover, Germany
| | - Sebastian Debus
- German Aorta Center Hamburg at the University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,sitem-insel AG, Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of partisan political control on financial performance, structure, and outcomes of for‐profit and not‐for‐profit US nursing homes. Data Sources/Study Setting Nineteen‐year panel (1996‐2014) of state election outcomes, financial performance data from nursing home cost reports, operational and aggregate resident characteristics from OSCAR of 13 737 nursing homes. Study Design A linear panel model was estimated to identify the effect of Democratic and Republican political control on next year's outcomes. Nursing home outcomes were defined as yearly facility revenues, expenses, and profits; the number of Medicaid, Medicare, and private‐pay residents; staffing levels; and selected resident outcomes. Principal Findings Democratic political control leads to an increase in financial flows to for‐profit nursing homes, boosting profits without producing observable improvements in resident outcomes. Republican political control leads to lower revenues and profits of for‐profit nursing homes. A shift from Medicaid to more profitable private‐pay residents following Republican political control is observed for all nursing homes. Financial performance of not‐for‐profit nursing homes is not significantly affected by changes in political control. Conclusion Political control of the two legislative chambers—but not of the governorship—shapes the structure of the nursing home industry as seen in provider behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Andrew D Foster
- Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Vincent Mor
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hatz MHM, Sonnenschein T, Blankart CR. The PMA Scale: A Measure of Physicians' Motivation to Adopt Medical Devices. Value Health 2017; 20:533-541. [PMID: 28407994 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have often stated that individual-level determinants are important drivers for the adoption of medical devices. Empirical evidence supporting this claim is, however, scarce. At the individual level, physicians' adoption motivation was often considered important in the context of adoption decisions, but a clear notion of its dimensions and corresponding measurement scales is not available. OBJECTIVES To develop and subsequently validate a scale to measure the motivation to adopt medical devices of hospital-based physicians. METHODS The development and validation of the physician-motivation-adoption (PMA) scale were based on a literature search, internal expert meetings, a pilot study with physicians, and a three-stage online survey. The data collected in the online survey were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the PMA scale was revised according to the results. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the results from the EFA in the third stage. Reliability and validity tests and subgroup analyses were also conducted. RESULTS Overall, 457 questionnaires were completed by medical personnel of the National Health Service England. The EFA favored a six-factor solution to appropriately describe physicians' motivation. The CFA confirmed the results from the EFA. Our tests indicated good reliability and validity of the PMA scale. CONCLUSIONS This is the first reliable and valid scale to measure physicians' adoption motivation. Future adoption studies assessing the individual level should include the PMA scale to obtain more information about the role of physicians' motivation in the broader adoption context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim Sonnenschein
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Varabyova Y, Blankart CR, Schreyögg J. The Role of Learning in Health Technology Assessments: An Empirical Assessment of Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs in German Hospitals. Health Econ 2017; 26 Suppl 1:93-108. [PMID: 28139092 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Changes in performance due to learning may dynamically influence the results of a technology evaluation through the change in effectiveness and costs. In this study, we estimate the effect of learning using the example of two minimally invasive treatments of abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and fenestrated EVAR (fEVAR). The analysis is based on the administrative data of over 40,000 patients admitted with unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm to more than 500 different hospitals over the years 2006 to 2013. We examine two patient outcomes, namely, in-hospital mortality and length of stay using hierarchical regression models with random effects at the hospital level. The estimated models control for patient and hospital characteristics and take learning interdependency between EVAR and fEVAR into account. In case of EVAR, we observe a significant decrease both in the in-hospital mortality and length of stay with experience accumulated at the hospital level; however, the learning curve for fEVAR in both outcomes is effectively flat. To foster the consideration of learning in health technology assessments of medical devices, a general framework for estimating learning effects is derived from the analysis. © 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Varabyova Y, Blankart CR, Greer AL, Schreyögg J. The determinants of medical technology adoption in different decisional systems: A systematic literature review. Health Policy 2017; 121:230-242. [PMID: 28162813 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Studies of determinants of adoption of new medical technology have failed to coalesce into coherent knowledge. A flaw obscuring strong patterns may be a common habit of treating a wide range of health care innovations as a generic technology. We postulate three decisional systems that apply to different medical technologies with distinctive expertise, interest, and authority: medical-individualistic, fiscal-managerial, and strategic-institutional decisional systems. This review aims to examine the determinants of the adoption of medical technologies based on the corresponding decision-making system. We included quantitative and qualitative studies that analyzed factors facilitating or inhibiting the adoption of medical technologies. In total, 65 studies published between 1974 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. These studies contained 688 occurrences of variables that were used to examine the adoption decisions, and we subsequently condensed these variables to 62 determinants in four main categories: organizational, individual, environmental, and innovation-related. The determinants and their empirical association with adoption were grouped and analyzed by the three decision-making systems. Although we did not identify substantial differences across the decision-making systems in terms of the direction of the determinants' influence on adoption, a clear pattern emerged in terms of the categories of determinants that were targeted in different decision-making systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Universität Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany; Brown University, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Universität Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Marfan syndrome is a rare multisystem disease of the connective tissue, which affects multiple organ systems. advances in healthcare have doubled the life-expectancy of patients over the past three decades. to date, there is no comprehensive review that consolidates economic considerations and care for marfan patients. Areas covered: Present research suggests that there may be a link between treatment pattern, disease progression and economic costs of Marfan syndrome. It indicates that an early detection of the disease and preventive interventions achieve a dual aim. From a patient perspective, it may reduce the amount of emergency surgery or intervention, and inpatient stays. In addition, it slows disease progression, lowers lifestyle restrictions, reduces psychological stress, and improves health-related quality of life. Expert commentary: Early detection and preventive measures are likely to achieve a dual aim by simultaneously containing costs and reducing the number and length of inpatient stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ricarda Milstein
- a Hamburg Center for Health Economics , Universität Hamburg , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Meike Rybczynski
- b University Heart Center Hamburg , University Hospital Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Helke Schüler
- b University Heart Center Hamburg , University Hospital Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Yskert von Kodolitsch
- b University Heart Center Hamburg , University Hospital Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blankart CR, Emanuel EJ, Bekelman JE. Characteristics of Patients Dying With Cancer in Developed Countries--Reply. JAMA 2016; 315:2732. [PMID: 27367773 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.4042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ezekiel J Emanuel
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Blankart CR, Stargardt T. Preferred supplier contracts in post-patent prescription drug markets. Health Care Manag Sci 2016; 20:419-432. [DOI: 10.1007/s10729-016-9362-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Bekelman JE, Halpern SD, Blankart CR, Bynum JP, Cohen J, Fowler R, Kaasa S, Kwietniewski L, Melberg HO, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Oosterveld-Vlug M, Pring A, Schreyögg J, Ulrich CM, Verne J, Wunsch H, Emanuel EJ. Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries. JAMA 2016; 315:272-83. [PMID: 26784775 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 334] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Differences in utilization and costs of end-of-life care among developed countries are of considerable policy interest. OBJECTIVE To compare site of death, health care utilization, and hospital expenditures in 7 countries: Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study using administrative and registry data from 2010. Participants were decedents older than 65 years who died with cancer. Secondary analyses included decedents of any age, decedents older than 65 years with lung cancer, and decedents older than 65 years in the United States and Germany from 2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Deaths in acute care hospitals, 3 inpatient measures (hospitalizations in acute care hospitals, admissions to intensive care units, and emergency department visits), 1 outpatient measure (chemotherapy episodes), and hospital expenditures paid by insurers (commercial or governmental) during the 180-day and 30-day periods before death. Expenditures were derived from country-specific methods for costing inpatient services. RESULTS The United States (cohort of decedents aged >65 years, N = 211,816) and the Netherlands (N = 7216) had the lowest proportion of decedents die in acute care hospitals (22.2.% and 29.4%, respectively). A higher proportion of decedents died in acute care hospitals in Belgium (N = 21,054; 51.2%), Canada (N = 20,818; 52.1%), England (N = 97,099; 41.7%), Germany (N = 24,434; 38.3%), and Norway (N = 6636; 44.7%). In the last 180 days of life, 40.3% of US decedents had an intensive care unit admission compared with less than 18% in other reporting nations. In the last 180 days of life, mean per capita hospital expenditures were higher in Canada (US $21,840), Norway (US $19,783), and the United States (US $18,500), intermediate in Germany (US $16,221) and Belgium (US $15,699), and lower in the Netherlands (US $10,936) and England (US $9342). Secondary analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients older than 65 years who died with cancer in 7 developed countries in 2010, end-of-life care was more hospital-centric in Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, and Norway than in the Netherlands or the United States. Hospital expenditures near the end of life were higher in the United States, Norway, and Canada, intermediate in Germany and Belgium, and lower in the Netherlands and England. However, intensive care unit admissions were more than twice as common in the United States as in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin E Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia2Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Scott D Halpern
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia4Department of Biostatistics and
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany6Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Julie P Bynum
- Center for Health Policy Research, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Joachim Cohen
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robert Fowler
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada10Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway12Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lukas Kwietniewski
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans Olav Melberg
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway14Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research and Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mariska Oosterveld-Vlug
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research and Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Pring
- National End of Life Care Intelligence Network, Public Health England, London
| | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Connie M Ulrich
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Julia Verne
- National End of Life Care Intelligence Network, Public Health England, London
| | - Hannah Wunsch
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ezekiel J Emanuel
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
von Kodolitsch Y, Blankart CR, Vogler M, Kallenbach K, Robinson PN. [Genetics and prevention of genetic aortic syndromes (GAS) and of the Marfan syndrome]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2015; 58:146-53. [PMID: 25446311 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-014-2093-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic aortic syndromes are autosomal-dominantly heritable aneurysms of the thoracic aorta, which carry a high risk of aortic rupture or acute thoracic aortic dissection at young age. OBJECTIVES We introduce the reader to the principles of genetic diagnostics and the medical and surgical prevention of thoracic aortic dissection in patients with genetic aortic syndromes. METHODS A cardiologist, a health economist, a patient representative, a heart surgeon, and a molecular geneticist teamed up to elucidate their perspective on major aspects of genetics and prevention of genetic aortic syndromes. RESULTS Genetic aortic syndromes reflect a broad spectrum of diverse disease entities comprising the Marfan syndrome, the Loeys-Dietz syndrome or the vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The diagnosis of each respective disease entity requires combined assessment of phenotype and genotype information. A medical prevention of aortic complications such as dissection is mandatory although a curative therapy currently appears unlikely in humans. The single most important measure against acute aortic dissection is the preventive replacement of the aortic root, where valve preserving techniques appear preferable. Comprehensive prophylaxis including molecular diagnostics seem reasonable also from an economic point of view. DISCUSSION Optimal prevention requires individualization of concepts, which entail a detailed diagnostic characterization of each specific genetic aortic syndrome including characterization of the genotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y von Kodolitsch
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemeine und Interventionelle Kardiologie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Achelrod D, Blankart CR, Linder R, von Kodolitsch Y, Stargardt T. The economic impact of Marfan syndrome: a non-experimental, retrospective, population-based matched cohort study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9:90. [PMID: 24954169 PMCID: PMC4082619 DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-9-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Marfan syndrome is a rare disease of the connective tissues, affecting multiple organ systems. Elevated morbidity and mortality in these patients raises the issue of costs for sickness funds and society. To date, there has been no study analysing the costs of Marfan syndrome from a sickness fund and societal perspective. Objective To estimate excess health resource utilisation, direct (non-)medical and indirect costs attributable to Marfan syndrome from a healthcare payer and a societal perspective in Germany in 2008. Methods A retrospective matched cohort study design is applied, using claims data. For isolating the causal effect of Marfan syndrome on excess costs, a genetic matching algorithm was used to reduce differences in observable characteristics between Marfan syndrome patients and the control group. 892 patients diagnosed with Marfan syndrome (ICD-10 Q87.4) were matched from a pool of 26,645 control individuals. After matching, we compared health resource utilisation and costs. Results From the sickness fund perspective, an average Marfan syndrome patient generates excess annual costs of €2496 compared with a control individual. From the societal perspective, excess annual costs amount to €15,728. For the sickness fund, the strongest cost drivers are inpatient treatment and care by non-physicians. From the sickness fund perspective, the third (25–41 years) and first (0–16 years) age quartiles reveal the greatest surplus in total costs. Marfan syndrome patients have 39% more physician contacts, a 153% longer average length of hospital stay, 119% more inpatient stays, 33% more prescriptions, 236% more medical imaging and 20% higher average prescription costs than control individuals. Depending on the prevalence, the economic impact from the sickness fund perspective ranges between €24.0 million and €61.4 million, whereas the societal economic impact extends from €151.3 million to €386.9 million. Conclusions Relative to its low frequency, Marfan syndrome requires high healthcare expenditure. Not only the high costs of Marfan syndrome but also its burden on patients’ lives call for more awareness from policy-makers, physicians and clinical researchers. Consequently, the diagnosis and treatment of Marfan syndrome should begin as soon as possible in order to prevent disease complications, early mortality and substantial healthcare expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitrij Achelrod
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Universität Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354 Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Blankart CR, Koch T, Linder R, Verheyen F, Schreyögg J, Stargardt T. Cost of illness and economic burden of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013; 8:32. [PMID: 23425552 PMCID: PMC3598307 DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2012] [Accepted: 02/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a slowly progressing but fatal disease that imposes a high economic burden on sickness funds and society. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the direct and indirect costs of CLL in Germany from the perspective of the sickness funds and society and analyze the burden of the disease. METHODS Using a database of 7.6 million enrolled individuals, we identified 4198 CLL patients in 2007 and 2008. The costs attributable to CLL were estimated using a case-control design with a randomly selected control group of 150 individuals per combination of age and sex. We used the bootstrap approach to estimate uncertainties in costs estimated. We employed generalized estimating equation regression models and count data models to test for differences in costs and healthcare utilization. RESULTS The cost attributable to CLL for each prevalent case amounts to €4946 from the payer's perspective and €7910 from a societal perspective. Inpatient hospital stays and pharmaceuticals are the main cost drivers of the disease. The economic burden of disease in Germany was estimated to be approximately €201 million per year for the sickness funds and €322 million for society. CONCLUSIONS Compared with common diseases, such as diabetes or COPD, the economic burden of CLL is considerably lower. However, the cost of treatment per case is about twice as high as the cost per case for these common diseases, even though treatment is only performed in the later stages of CLL. With new healthcare technologies, the aging population, and the increasing incidence of the disease, it is likely that the economic burden of the disease will continue to grow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Esplanade 36, D-20354, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Blankart CR. Does healthcare infrastructure have an impact on delay in diagnosis and survival? Health Policy 2012; 105:128-37. [PMID: 22296953 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2011] [Revised: 12/20/2011] [Accepted: 01/09/2012] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether healthcare infrastructure impacts delay in diagnosis, and to determine whether healthcare infrastructure and delay in diagnosis impacts survival in gastric cancer. METHODS Administrative data from 2175 gastric cancer patients was analyzed using two Cox proportional hazard models with (i) delay in diagnosis and (ii) survival as dependent variables. Density of general practitioners, density of gastroenterologists, characteristics of specialty treatment centers, demographic information, and comorbidities were included in the models. Differentiation was made between urban and rural areas. RESULTS The likelihood of being diagnosed increased with an increase in general practitioners (p<0.0001) and gastroenterologists (p<0.0001) in rural areas. In urban areas a higher density of general practitioners reduced delay in diagnosis (p=0.0262), while a higher density of gastroenterologists did not (p=0.2480). The number of gastric cancer cases performed in hospital had a positive impact on survival (p<0.0001), while outpatient infrastructure did not. CONCLUSION Delay in diagnosis can be reduced by higher availability of general practitioners and gastroenterologists in rural areas. Given the already very high density of physicians in urban areas there is no effect of additional gastroenterologists. As learning effects can be observed with increased hospital volumes, minimum volumes for treatment of gastric cancer may be defined.
Collapse
|
35
|
Blankart CR, Stargardt T, Schreyögg J. Availability of and access to orphan drugs: an international comparison of pharmaceutical treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, hereditary angioedema and chronic myeloid leukaemia. Pharmacoeconomics 2011; 29:63-82. [PMID: 21073206 DOI: 10.2165/11539190-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Market authorization does not guarantee patient access to any given drug. This is particularly true for costly orphan drugs because access depends primarily on co-payments, reimbursement policies and prices. The objective of this article is to identify differences in the availability of orphan drugs and in patient access to them in 11 pharmaceutical markets: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Switzerland and the US. METHODS Four rare diseases were selected for analysis: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), Fabry disease (FD), hereditary angioedema (HAE) and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Indicators for availability were defined as (i) the indications for which orphan drugs had been authorized in the treatment of these diseases; (ii) the application date; and (iii) the date upon which these drugs received market authorization in each country. Indicators of patient access were defined as (i) the outcomes of technology appraisals; (ii) the extent of coverage provided by healthcare payers; and (iii) the price of the drugs in each country. For PAH we analysed bosentan, iloprost, sildenafil, treprostinil (intravenous and inhaled) as well as sitaxentan and ambrisentan; for FD we analysed agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta; for HAE we analysed icatibant, ecallantide and two complement C1s inhibitors; for CML we analysed imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib. RESULTS Most drugs included in this study had received market authorization in all countries, but the range of indications for which they had been authorized differed by country. The broadest range of indications was found in Australia, and the largest variations in indications were found for PAH drugs. Authorization process speed (the time between application and market authorization) was fastest in the US, with an average of 362 days, followed by the EU (394 days). The highest prices for the included drugs were found in Germany and the US, and the lowest in Canada, Australia and England. Although the prices of all of the included drugs were high compared with those of most non-orphan drugs, most of the insurance plans in our country sample provided coverage for authorized drugs after a certain threshold. CONCLUSIONS Availability of and access to orphan drugs play a key role in determining whether patients will receive adequate and efficient treatment. Although the present study showed some variations between countries in selected indicators of availability and access to orphan drugs, virtually all of the drugs in question were available and accessible in our sample. However, substantial co-payments in the US and Canada represent important barriers to patient access, especially in the case of expensive treatments such as those analysed in this study. Market exclusivity is a strong instrument for fostering orphan drug development and drug availability. However, despite the positive effect of this instrument, the conditions under which market exclusivity is granted should be reconsidered in cases where the costs of developing an orphan drug have already been amortized through the use of the drug's active ingredient for the treatment of a common indication.
Collapse
|