1
|
Enzmann FK, Grandi A, Panuccio G, Torrealba JI, Kluckner M, Nana P, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Unintended Exchange of Target Vessels for Celiac Trunk and Superior Mesenteric Artery Branches in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241251985. [PMID: 38708984 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241251985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) is safe and effective. During deployment, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) branch can unintentionally open into the celiac trunk (CT) ostium and switched catheterization of the SMA from the CT branch and the CT from the SMA branch can be used as an alternative technique in these cases. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of exchanging the intended target vessels (TVs) for the CT and SMA branches during BEVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with TAAAs who underwent BEVAR, using off-the-shelf or custom-made devices (CMDs), with an unintended exchange of TVs for the CT and SMA branches was performed. RESULTS Between 2014 and 2023, 397 patients were treated with BEVAR for TAAA. Eighteen (4.5%) of those patients were treated with an exchange of TVs for the CT and SMA branches. T-branch was used in 9 cases (50%) and the remaining patients were treated with CMDs. Twelve patients were treated electively, 3 were symptomatic and 3 presented with rupture. Of 36 mesenteric TVs in those 18 patients, 34 (94%) were catheterized successfully, including all 18 SMAs and 16 of the 18 CTs. No branch stenosis or occlusion of the switched mesenteric TVs was detected during follow-up. During 30-day follow-up, 3 patients died and during a median follow-up of 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-15) months 3 more patients died. None of the deaths or the 2 unintended reinterventions was induced by the mesenteric TV exchange. The median hospital stay was 14 (IQR: 9-22) days with a median of 4 (IQR: 2-11) days at the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION The exchange of the mesenteric TVs for the CT and SMA branches during BEVAR with off-the-shelf and CMD endografts is feasible with good TV patency and freedom from TV-related reinterventions. This alternative technique should be considered in selected cases when direct catheterization via the intended branch is deemed more time-consuming or not feasible. CLINICAL IMPACT This is the first description of using an exchange of target vessels for the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery branches in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing BEVAR, using off-the-shelf or custom-made devices. The high success rate as well as the good clinical results without any branch stenosis or occlusion during follow-up highlight the feasibility of this alternative technique. It could help in challenging cases when catheterization of the intended target vessels is not possible or too time consuming, resulting in higher success rates of BEVAR and better clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian K Enzmann
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - José Ignacio Torrealba
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michaela Kluckner
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berczeli M, Kölbel T, Tsilimparis N, Karelis A, Oderich GS, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Sonesson B, Dias NV. Multicentre Experience with Novel Bidirectional Double Cuffed Inner Branches for Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00376-9. [PMID: 38705454 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to report the initial experience with a novel bidirectional double cuff inner branch design for incorporation of renal and mesenteric arteries in patients undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken of the experience of F/BEVAR with grafts integrating at least one bidirectional double cuffed inner branch implanted at three tertiary aortic centres between March 2022 and June 2023. All consecutive patients were included. Baseline characteristics, operative and follow up data were collected. Results were presented as number or median (interquartile) unless otherwise stated. RESULTS Thirteen patients (10 male; median age 72 [68, 77] years) had F/BEVAR using a total of 15 bidirectional double cuffed inner branches (30 cuffs). Indications for bidirectional doubled cuffed inner branches included cranial vessel orientation or double renal arteries in four patients each, common coeliomesenteric trunk in three patients, and early renal artery bifurcation, renal artery origin from a false lumen requiring a flexible route for catheterisation, and surplus configuration in one patient each. Twenty three of the 30 cuffs were used, whereas the remaining seven cuffs were intentionally occluded with vascular plugs. Target vessel incorporation was successful in all bidirectional branches. There was one technical failure related to unsuccessful catheterisation of a left renal artery targeted through a unidirectional caudal inner branch. During a median follow up of seven months there were no instances of target vessel instability or re-interventions and two patients died of causes unrelated to the bidirectional branches. CONCLUSION The results of the use of bidirectional double cuff inner branches are promising, with high technical success and no short term branch related complications in this preliminary experience. This could potentially expand the applicability of branch endografting of complex endovascular aortic repairs, but long term results are still missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Márton Berczeli
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Angelos Karelis
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Björn Sonesson
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuno V Dias
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Apostolidis G, Haulon S, Kölbel T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of fenestrated or branched devices after previous open surgical aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:1251-1261.e4. [PMID: 37757916 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms being considered as a durable solution, disease progression and para-anastomotic aneurysms may require further repair, and fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) may be applied to address these pathologies. The aim of this systematic review was to assess technical success, mortality, and morbidity (acute kidney injury, spinal cord ischemia) at 30 days, and mortality and reintervention rates during the available follow-up, in patients managed with F/BEVAR after previous OSR. METHODS The PRISMA statement was followed, and the study was pre-registered to the PROSPERO (CRD42022363214). The English literature was searched, via Ovid, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, through November 30, 2022. Observational studies and case series with ≥5 patients (2000-2022), reporting on F/BEVAR outcomes after OSR, were considered eligible. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence. The primary outcome was technical success, mortality, and morbidity at 30 days. Data on the outcomes of interest were synthesized using proportional meta-analysis. RESULTS The initial search yielded 1694 articles. Eight retrospective studies (476 patients) were considered eligible. In 78.3% of cases, disease progression set the indication for reintervention. Technical success was estimated at 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-98%; I2 = 0%; 95% prediction interval [PI], 79%-99%). Thirty-day mortality was 2% (95% CI, 1%-9%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-28%). The estimated spinal cord ischemia and acute kidney injury rates were 3% (95% CI, 1%-9%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-30%) and 6% (95% CI, 2%-15%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 1%-40%), respectively. During follow-up, overall mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%-12%; I2 = 34%; 95% PI, 0%-45%) and aorta-related mortality was 1% (95% CI, 0%-2%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-3%). The rate of reinterventions was 16% (95% CI, 9%-26%; I2 = 22%; 95% PI, 3%-50%). CONCLUSIONS According to the available literature, F/BEVAR after OSR may be performed with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity during the perioperative period. Follow-up aortic-related mortality was 1%, whereas the reintervention rates were within the standard range following F/BEVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany; Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - George Apostolidis
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Behrendt CA, Heckenkamp J, Bergsträßer A, Billing A, Böckler D, Bücker A, Cotta L, Donas KP, Grözinger G, Heidecke CD, Hinterseher I, Horn S, Kaltwasser A, Kiefer A, Kirnich-Müller C, Kock L, Kölbel T, Czerny M, Kralewski C, Kurz S, Larena-Avellaneda A, Mutlak H, Oberhuber A, Oikonomou K, Pfeiffer M, Pfister K, Reeps C, Schäfer A, Schmitz-Rixen T, Steinbauer M, Steinbauer C, Strupp D, Stolecki D, Trenner M, Veit C, Verhoeven E, Waydhas C, Weber CF, Adili F. [Recommendations for the specialist further training of nursing personnel on intensive care units in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a modified Delphi procedure with experts]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2024; 95:395-405. [PMID: 38498123 PMCID: PMC11031449 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02066-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The medical development in the previous 15 years and the changes in treatment reality of the comprehensive elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms necessitate a re-evaluation of the quality assurance guidelines of the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (QBAA-RL). In the current version this requires a specialist further training quota for nursing personnel in intensive care wards of 50%. The quota was determined in 2008 based on expert opinions, although a direct empirical evidence base for this does not exist. METHODS Representatives from the fields of patient representation, physicians, nursing personnel and other relevant interface areas were invited to participate in a modified Delphi procedure. Following a comprehensive narrative literature search, a survey and focus group discussions with national and international experts, a total of three anonymized online-based voting rounds were carried out for which previously determined key statements were assessed with a 4‑point Likert scale (totally disagree up to totally agree). In addition, the expert panel had also defined a recommendation for a minimum quota for the specialist training of nursing personnel on intensive care wards in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, whereby an a priori agreement of 80% of the participants was defined as the consensus limit. RESULTS Overall, 37 experts participated in the discussions and three successive voting rounds (participation rate 89%). The panel confirmed the necessity of a re-evaluation of the guideline recommendations and recommended the introduction of a shift-related minimum quota of 30% of the full-time equivalent of nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the introduction of structured promotional programs for long-term elevation of the quota. CONCLUSION In this national Delphi procedure with medical and nursing experts as well as representatives of patients, the fundamental benefits and needs of professional specialist qualifications in the field of intensive care medicine were confirmed. The corresponding minimum quota for specialist further training of intensive care nursing personnel should generally apply without limitations to specific groups. The expert panel stipulates a shift-related minimum quota for intensive care nursing personnel with specialist training of 30% of the nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the obligatory introduction of structured and transparent promotion programs for the long-term enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- Deutsches Institut für Gefäßmedizinische Gesundheitsforschung gGmbH, Berlin, Deutschland.
- Abt. für Allgemeine und Endovaskuläre Gefäßchirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Wandsbek, Asklepios Medical School, Alphonsstr. 14, 22043, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | | | | | - Arend Billing
- Kommission Krankenhausökonomie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Dittmar Böckler
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Arno Bücker
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland
| | - Livia Cotta
- Deutsches Institut für Gefäßmedizinische Gesundheitsforschung gGmbH, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Konstantinos P Donas
- Rhein Main Vascular Center, Klinik für vaskuläre und endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Asklepios Kliniken Langen, Paulinen Wiesbaden und Seligenstadt, Langen, Deutschland
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Abt. für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Claus-Dieter Heidecke
- Institut für Qualität und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIG), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Irene Hinterseher
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ruppin-Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Deutschland
| | - Silvio Horn
- Gefäßchirurgie, Alexianer St. Josefs Krankenhaus Potsdam, Potsdam, Deutschland
| | - Arnold Kaltwasser
- Sektion Pflegeforschung und Pflegequalität, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Kiefer
- Deutscher Berufsverband für Pflegeberufe (DBfK) Bundesverband e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Lars Kock
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, Immanuel Albertinen Diakonie, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Klinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Martin Czerny
- Abteilung für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
- Medizinische Fakultät, Albert Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Christian Kralewski
- Kompetenz-Centrum Qualitätssicherung (KCQ), Medizinischer Dienst Baden-Württemberg, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Stephan Kurz
- Klinik für Herz‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Deutschland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Axel Larena-Avellaneda
- Abteilung für Gefäß- und endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Asklepios Medical School, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Haitham Mutlak
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv- und Schmerzmedizin, SANA Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Oberhuber
- Klinik für Vaskuläre und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Uniklinik Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Kyriakos Oikonomou
- Abteilung für Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Manfred Pfeiffer
- Interessenvertretung Patienten-&-Versicherte, Sörgenloch, Deutschland
| | - Karin Pfister
- Universitäres Gefäßzentrum Ostbayern, Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Christian Reeps
- Bereich Gefäß- und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Uniklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Schäfer
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft e. V., Duisburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Markus Steinbauer
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, Gefäßzentrum, Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Claudia Steinbauer
- Katholische Akademie für Berufe im Gesundheits- und Sozialwesen, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Strupp
- Intensivpflege, Asklepios Klinik Wandsbek, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Dietmar Stolecki
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fachkrankenpflege und Funktionsdienste e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Eric Verhoeven
- Klinikum Nürnberg und Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Nürnberg, Deutschland
| | - Christian Waydhas
- Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik Für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Christian F Weber
- Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Wandsbek, Hamburg, Deutschland
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Farzin Adili
- Klinik für Gefäßmedizin, Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gorgatti F, Nana P, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Torrealba JI, Kölbel T. Post-dissection Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Managed with Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00377-0. [PMID: 38697255 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fenestrated or branched endovascular repairs (f/bEVAR) are valuable treatments in patients with chronic post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (PD-TAAA). This study aimed to analyse early and follow up outcomes of f/bEVAR. DESIGN Thirty day and follow up outcomes of consecutive patients with PD-TAAA treated with f/bEVAR in a tertiary centre over 8 years were retrospectively analysed. METHODS All patients presenting with PD-TAAA and managed with f/bEVAR, were eligible. Modified Crawford's classification system was used. Thirty day mortality and major adverse events (MAE) were analysed. Time to event data were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS Fifty five patients (80% men, mean age 63.7 ± 7.7 years) were included: 12 (22%) were managed urgently; 25 (46%) for chronic type B aortic dissection; and the remainder for residual type A aortic dissection. Of these patients, 88% had undergone previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was used in 91%. Fifteen (27%) patients were treated with fEVAR, nine (16%) with fenestrations and branches, and 31 (56%) with bEVAR. False lumen adjunctive procedures were used in 56%. Technical success was achieved in 96% of patients. Thirty day mortality was 7% and MAE rate was 20%. Spinal cord injury (SCI) grades 1 - 3 and grade 3 rates were 13% and 2%, respectively. Mean follow up was 33.0 ± 18.4 months. Survival and freedom from unscheduled re-intervention were 86% (SE 5%) and 55% (SE 8%) at 24 months, respectively. Freedom from target vessel stenosis and occlusion was higher in fEVAR at the 12 month follow up (p = .006) compared with bEVAR. CONCLUSION Fenestrated or branched endovascular repairs in patients with PD-TAAA showed high technical success, with acceptable early mortality and MAE rates. The SCI rate was > 10%, despite CSFD use and staged procedures. Almost one-half of patients needed an unscheduled re-intervention within 24 months after f/bEVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Gorgatti
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - José I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nana P, Panuccio G, Torrealba JI, Rohlffs F, Spanos K, Kölbel T. Sex Comparative Analysis on Branched and Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00366-6. [PMID: 38677467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Female sex is a risk factor for adverse events after endovascular aortic repair. Sex comparative early and mid term outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic arch repair (f/b-Arch) are presented. METHODS Single centre retrospective sex comparative analysis of consecutive patients managed with f/b-Arch according to STROBE. Primary outcomes were sex comparative technical success, mortality, and cerebrovascular morbidity at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for follow up outcomes. RESULTS Among 209 patients, 38.3% were women. Coronary artery disease (p < .001) and previous myocardial infarction (p = .001) were more common in women. Non- native proximal aortic landing was higher in women (women: 51.3%; men: 31.8%, p = .005) and aortic dissection rate was lower (28.8% vs. 48.1%, p = .005). Proximal landing to Ishimaru zones showed no difference (zone 0: p = .18; zone 1: p = .47; zone 2: p = .39). Graft configurations were equally distributed. In total, 416 supra-aortic trunks were bridged. Median number of revascularisations per patient was 2 (interquartile range 1, 3), with no difference between sexes (p = .54). Technical success (women: 97.5%; men: 96.7%, p = .80), 30 day mortality (women: 10%; men: 9.3%, p = .86), and cerebrovascular morbidity (women: 11.3%; men: 17.1%, p = .25) were similar. Women presented more access related complications (women: 32.5%; men: 16.3%, p = .006), without affecting access related re-interventions (p = .55). Survival (women: 81.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76.3 - 85.9%; men: 79.8%, 95% CI 76.0 - 83.6%) and freedom from re-intervention (women: 56.6%, 95% CI 50.4 - 62.8%); men: 55.3%, 95% CI 50.1 - 60.5%) at 12 months were similar (log rank, p = .40 and p = .41, respectively). CONCLUSION Both sexes presented similar outcomes after f/b-Arch. Appropriate patient selection may decrease the effect of sex in f/b-Arch outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - José I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torrealba JI, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Nana P, Toader RI, Arulrajah K, Kölbel T. The Electrified Wire Technique in Complex Aortic Interventions: A Case Series. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241245341. [PMID: 38597263 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241245341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Electrosurgery has been long used in endovascular procedures, with only case reports in the aortic field. Our aim is to present a case series with the use of an electrified wire to perform catheter-based electrosurgery by applying external current through an electrocautery pen. METHODS Single-center retrospective case series of all patients undergoing complex aortic surgery from October 2020 to August 2023, in whom the electrified wire technique was used: (1) Perforation of a dissection flap or left subclavian artery (LSA) in situ endograft fenestration-a 0.014" polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) insulated guidewire is detached from the insulation with a scalpel at the end and a cautery pen is here attached with a clamp. A curved tip catheter or sheath is positioned against the aortic flap or the endograft (through a left brachial access in this case) and the wire pushed, crossing the flap by activating the electrocautery pen and (2) slicing a dissection flap ("powered cheese-wire technique")-after same preparation as above, the middle section of the 0.014 guidewire is removed from the PTFE and bent into a V-shape. Once in the aorta, the guidewire crosses from the true lumen (TL) to the false lumen (FL) and a through-and-through access is obtained. Sheaths are positioned against the flap from both sides and moved up or down while the electricity is activated, slicing the flap and communicating both lumens. Technical success and technical-related complications were evaluated. RESULTS Eleven cases concerning aortic dissections and 1 case of aortic atresia were treated. Four patients presented urgently, whereas the rest were planned procedures. Seven cases underwent perforation of a dissection flap, 2 cases underwent the powered cheese-wire technique, in 2 cases for an LSA in situ fenestration, and in 1 case to cross an aortic atresia at the aortic isthmus. The technique was in all cases successfully applied. No complications related to the technique occurred. CONCLUSIONS The "electrified wire" technique is a feasible and ready-available tool that can be safely used in complex aortic interventions, especially to perforate aortic tissue like dissection flaps or to perform in situ fenestrated repairs by perforation of the endograft fabric. CLINICAL IMPACT The electrified wire technique described herein is a straightforward technique that uses readily available tools to perform electrosurgery. We present its use in complex aortic procedures. However, it could be envisioned for any vascular procedure that requires crossing of the vessel or even prosthetic material. As we have described in this series, when used along with an adequate properative planning, it can be a safe tool of great utility, as has already been demonstarted in the field of the interventional cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Radu-Ionut Toader
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kugarajah Arulrajah
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Detter C, von Kodolitsch Y, Torrealba JI, Kölbel T. Branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic arch repair in patients with native proximal aortic landing zone. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)00931-5. [PMID: 38580160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fenestrated and branched thoracic endovascular repair (f/bTEVAR) have been successfully applied in patients with diverse aortic arch pathologies. The aim of this study is to present the early and mid-term outcomes of patients with native proximal aortic landing (NPAL) managed with f/bTEVAR. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with NPAL, managed with f/bTEVAR, between September 1, 2011, and June 30, 2022, was conducted. All patients were treated with custom-made devices (Cook Medical) with landing within Ishimaru zones 0 to 2. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality, stroke, and retrograde type A dissection at 30 days. Follow-up outcomes were considered secondary. RESULTS A total of 126 patients were included (69.8% males; mean age, 70.8 ± 4.2 years; 18.3% urgent). The main indications (60.4%) for repair were aortic arch (29.4%) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (31.0%). Seventy-two patients (57.1%) were managed with fTEVAR. Proximal landing in zone 0 and 1 was chosen in 97.6%. Technical success was 94.4%, and 30-day mortality was 11.9%. Strokes were diagnosed in 13.5% of patients and major strokes were identified in 7.9% cases. Retrograde type A dissection rate was 3.9%. The multivariate analysis confirmed landing in Ishimaru zone 0 as an independently related factor for stroke (P = .005), whereas stroke (P < .001), pericardial effusion (P < .001), and acute kidney injury (P < .001) were independently related to 30-day mortality. Mean follow-up was 17.5 ± 9.3 months. The estimated survival rate and the freedom from reintervention rate were 72.6% (standard error, 4.4%) and 46.4% (standard error, 6.0%) at 24-month follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Stroke rate after endovascular arch repair was alarming among patients with NPAL. Proximal landing to zone 0 was related to higher risk of stroke. Reinterventions were common within the 24-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Detter
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yskert von Kodolitsch
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - José I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kouvelos G, Spanos K, Eilenberg WH, Kölbel T. Editorial: Challenges and outcomes of complex endovascular aortic repair. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1379282. [PMID: 38596693 PMCID: PMC11002241 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1379282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- George Kouvelos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Wolf-Hans Eilenberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rohlffs F, Nana P, Panuccio G, Torrealba JI, Tsilimparis N, Rybczynski M, Detter C, Kölbel T. A Retrospective Analysis of 10-year Experience on Branched and Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00815. [PMID: 38501239 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to present the early and mid-term outcomes of fenestrated/branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f/bTEVAR) for aortic arch pathologies. BACKGROUND f/bTEVAR represents a less invasive treatment option for aortic arch diseases. Previous published series showed decreased early mortality and morbidity compared to open repair. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, managed with f/bTEVAR (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) between 01.09.11and 30.06.22 was conducted. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30-day mortality and stroke. Data during follow-up and factors affecting early mortality and stroke were analyzed. RESULTS 209 patients were included (38.3% females; mean age 69.8±3.4years; mean aortic diameter 61±4.7 mm); 14.4% were managed urgently. Fenestrations/scallop configuration was used in 39.7%, branched devices in 55.5% and branch/scallop combination in 4.8%. Landing to zone 0 was performed in 65.5% and in zone 1 in 32.1%. Non-native aortas were used for landing in 39.2%. Technical success was 97.1% and 30-day mortality 9.5%. Strokes were identified in 10%; 5.7% major. Non-native proximal aortic landing zone was an independent protective factor for stroke (P=0.002). Post-operative stroke (P<0.001) and pericardial effusion (P<0.001) were independently related to 30-day mortality. The mean follow-up was 21±8 months. The estimated survival and freedom from reintervention rates were 79.5% (standard error; SE3.1%) and 47.1% (SE 4.3%) at 24months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS f/bTEVAR presented high technical success and acceptable 30-day mortality. Non-native proximal landing zone was related to lower stroke rate. Half of patients needed a reintervention within the 24-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jose I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Meike Rybczynski
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Detter
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hatzl J, van Basten Batenburg M, Yeung KK, Fioole B, Verhoeven E, Lauwers G, Kölbel T, Wever JJ, Scheinert D, Van den Eynde W, Rouhani G, Mees BME, Vermassen F, Schelzig H, Böckler D, Cuypers PWM. Clinical Performance of the Low Profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft: 2 Year Results from the ZEPHYR Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00207-7. [PMID: 38490356 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The midterm outcomes of the low profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft from the ZEnith alPHa for aneurYsm Repair (ZEPHYR) registry are reported. METHODS The ZEPHYR registry is a physician initiated, multicentre, non-randomised, core laboratory controlled, prospective registry. Inclusion criteria were patients with a non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 50 mm or enlargement > 5 mm within 6 months, with a site reported infrarenal neck length of ≥ 10 mm and with the intention to electively implant the Zenith Alpha abdominal endograft. Patients from 14 sites across Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands were included. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as technical success and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of the endograft in the planned position without unintentional coverage of internal iliac or renal arteries, with successful removal of the delivery system. Clinical success was defined as freedom from aneurysm sac expansion > 5 mm, type I or type III endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, stent graft migration > 10 mm, open conversion, and stent graft occlusion. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the ZEPHYR registry. The median clinical follow up was 743 days (interquartile range [IQR] 657, 806) with a median imaging follow up of 725 days (IQR 408, 788). Treatment success at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 92.5%, 90.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Freedom from secondary intervention was 94.3%, 93.4%, and 86.9%, respectively. The predominant reason for secondary intervention was limb complications. Freedom from limb occlusion (per patient) at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 97.2%, 95.8%, and 92.5%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses could not identify any independent predictor for limb complications. CONCLUSION While treatment success is comparable with other commercially available grafts, the rate of limb complications at 2 years is of concern. The manufacturer's instructions for use should be followed closely. Further studies are necessary to investigate the root cause of the increased rate of limb complications with the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hatzl
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Kak K Yeung
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bram Fioole
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Verhoeven
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Geert Lauwers
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan J Wever
- Departments of Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Dierk Scheinert
- Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Wouter Van den Eynde
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Guido Rouhani
- Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Vermassen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hubert Schelzig
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Medical Centre Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Dittmar Böckler
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nana P, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Torrealba JI, Tsilimparis N, Kölbel T. Early and midterm outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair in thoracoabdominal aneurysms types I through III. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:457-468.e2. [PMID: 38453660 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) has shown high technical success and low early mortality rates. Aneurysm extent has been reported as a factor affecting outcomes. This study aimed to assess the early and midterm follow-up outcomes of patients managed by F/BEVAR for types I through III TAAAs. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted, including data from consecutive, elective and urgent (symptomatic and ruptured cases), patients treated for types I through III TAAAs, between October 1, 2011, and October 1, 2022, using F/BEVAR. Degenerative and postdissection TAAAs were included. Patients received prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD), except those under therapeutic anticoagulation, those who were hemodynamically unstable, or those with failed CSFD application. When an initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed, as part of a staged procedure, no CSFD was used. Later stages and nonstaged procedures were performed under CSFD. Thirty-day mortality and major adverse events (MAEs) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for follow-up outcomes. RESULTS F/BEVAR for types I through III TAAAs was performed in 209 patients (56.9% males; mean age, 69.6 ± 3.2 years; mean aneurysm diameter, 65.2 ± 6.2 mm); 29.2% type I, 57.9% type II, and 12.9% type III. Urgent repair was performed in 26.7% of patients (56 cases; 23 ruptured and 33 symptomatic cases) and 153 were treated electively. Thirty-two patients (15.3%) were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class IV. CSFD was used in 91% and staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed in 51.2% of patients. Technical success was 93.8% (96.7% in elective vs 94.6% in urgent cases; P = .92). Thirty-day mortality was 11.0% (4.6% in elective vs 28.5% in urgent cases; P < .001) and MAEs were recorded in 17.2% of cases (7.8% in elective vs 42.8% in urgent cases; P < .001). Spinal cord ischemia rate was 20.5% (17.6% in elective vs 28.7% in urgent cases; P = .08), whereas 2.9% of patients presented paraplegia (1.3% in elective and 7.1% in urgent cases; P = .03). The mean follow-up was 16 ± 5 months. Survival was 75.0% (standard error, 4.0%) and freedom from reintervention was 73.3% (standard error, 4.4%) at 36 months. ASA IV and urgent repair were detected as independent factors related to early mortality and MAE, whereas ruptured aneurysm status was related to spinal cord ischemia evolution. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular repair for types I through III TAAAs provides encouraging early outcomes in terms of mortality, MAE, and paraplegia, especially in an elective setting. Setting of repair and baseline ASA score should be taken into consideration during decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jose I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nana P, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Spanos K, Torrealba JI, Kölbel T. Target Vessel-Related Outcomes in Patients Managed With Branch Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241231905. [PMID: 38380515 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241231905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data on target vessel (TV)-related outcomes in patients managed with branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (BTEVAR) are limited. This study aimed to present the TV-related outcomes of BTEVAR in patients managed for aortic arch pathologies at 30 days and during follow-up. METHODS A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, managed between September 1, 2011, and June 30, 2022, with custom-made aortic arch endografts (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), presenting at least one branch configuration, were eligible. Primary outcomes were technical success, TV-related patency, and reinterventions at 30 days. RESULTS In total, 255 TVs were revascularized using branches: 107 innominate arteries (IAs), 108 left common carotid arteries (LCCAs), and 40 left subclavian arteries (LSAs). Covered stents were used as bridging stents of which 10.2% were balloon expandable. Relining, using bare-metal stents (BMS), was performed in 14.0% of IAs, 35.2% of LCCAs, and 22.5% of LSAs. Technical success on case basis was 99.2%; no failure was related to unsuccessful TV bridging. At 30 day follow-up, no TV occlusion was detected. In 5.6% of cases, a type Ic or III endoleak, attributed to TVs, was recorded. Two patients needed early branch-related reintervention. The mean follow-up was 18.3±9.2 months. Freedom from TV instability was 94.6% (standard error [SE] 2.5%] at 12 months. No TV stenosis or occlusion was detected up to 48 months of follow-up. Freedom from TV-related reinterventions was 95.4% [SE 2.4%] at 12 months. CONCLUSION TV stenosis or occlusion in BTEVAR cases is rare and TV-related reinterventions and instability events are mainly attributed to type Ic and III endoleak formation. CLINICAL IMPACT Previous studies focusing on target vessel (TV) outcomes after endovascular aortic arch repair are limited. In this study, including 255 TVs revascularized using branched arch devices, bridging was performed with covered stents, of which 90% were self-expanding. Relining was at the discretion of the operator and was 14% for the innominate, 35.2% for the left common carotid and 22.5% for the left subclavian artery branches. No 30-day occlusion was detected. The freedom from TV instability was almost 95% at 12 months. TV instability and reintervention were mainly attributed to endoleaks type Ic and IIIc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jose I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Behrendt CA, Brodis A, Haulon S, Kölbel T. A Systematic Review on Thoracic Endovascular Repair Outcomes in Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241233163. [PMID: 38369733 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241233163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) represents a potentially life-threatening condition and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is recommended as the first-line treatment (Class I level of evidence C) by the current guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the perioperative and mid-term follow-up outcomes of patients with BTAI treated with TEVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the English literature published between 2000 and 2022, via Ovid, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, until July 30, 2022. Observational studies and case series, with ≥5 patients, reporting on the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Primary outcomes were technical success and 30-day mortality, cerebrovascular morbidity. Secondary outcomes were mortality and re-interventions during the mid-term follow-up. RESULTS From 5201 articles identified by the literature search, 35 eligible studies were included in this review. All studies had a retrospective study design. In total, 991 patients were included. The mean age was 34.5±16.5 years (range=16-89 years). Technical success was 98.0% (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.98, 0.99, p<0.001, I2=0%). Mortality at 30 days was 5.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.03, 0.06, p<0.001, I2=5.56%). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 1.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=0%) and stroke rate was 2.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=0%). The available follow-up was estimated at 29 months (range=3-119 months) with mortality rate at 2.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=0%) and re-intervention rate at 1.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=10.5%). CONCLUSION Thoracic endovascular aortic repair showed high technical success and low early cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality rates. In the mid-term follow-up, the estimated mortality and re-intervention rates were also low. Furthermore, higher quality prospective studies are needed. CLINICAL IMPACT Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is recommended as the first line treatement in patients with blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI). This systematic review of 35 retrospective studies and 991 patients showed high technical success (98.0%) with an associated 30-day mortality at 5.0% and low spinal cord ischemia (1%) and stroke rates (2.0%). Mid-term mortality and re-intervention rates reassure the effectiveness of TEVAR in BTAI cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexandros Brodis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spath P, Tsilimparis N, Gallitto E, Becker D, Vacirca A, Berekoven B, Panuccio G, Karelis A, Kahlberg A, Melissano G, Dias N, Kölbel T, Austermann M, Faggioli G, Oderich G, Gargiulo M. Endovascular Repair of One-hundred Urgent and Emergent free or Contained Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Ruptures. An International Multi-Center Trans-Atlantic experience. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00770. [PMID: 38323417 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the outcomes of urgent/emergent endovascular aortic repair of patients with free/contained ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (rTAAA). BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of rTAAA has been scarcely described in emergent setting. METHODS An international multicenter retrospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.govID:NCT05956873) from January-2015 to January-2023 in 6 European and 1 United States Vascular Surgery Centers. Primary end-points were technical success, 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality and follow-up survival. RESULTS A total of 100 rTAAA patients were included (75 male; mean age 73 y). All patients (86 contained and 14 free ruptures) were symptomatic and treated within 24-hours from diagnosis: multi-branched off-the-shelf devices (Zenith t-branch,Cook Medical Inc.Bjaeverskov,Denmark) in 88 patients, physician-modified endografts in 8, patient-specific device or parallel grafts in two patients each. Primary technical success was achieved in 89 patients and 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality was 24%. Major adverse events (MAEs) occurred in 34% of patients (permanent dialysis and paraplegia in 4 and 8 patients, respectively). No statistical differences were detected in mortality rates between free and contained ruptured patients (43%vs.21%; P =0.075). Multivariate analysis revealed contained rupture favoring technical success (Odd-Ratio10.1;95%Confidence-Interval:3.0-33.6; P =<0.001). MAEs (OR9.4;95%C-I:2.8-30.5; P =<0.001) and pulmonary complications (OR11.3;95%CI:3.0-41.5; P =<0.001) were independent risk factors for 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality. Median follow-up time was 13 months (interquartile range 5-24); 1-year survival rate was 65%. Aneurysm diameter>80 mm (Hazard-Ratio:2.0;95%CI:1.0-30.5; P =0.037), technical failure (HR:2.6;95%CI:1.1-6.5; P =0.045) and pulmonary complications (HR:3.0;95%CI:1.2-7.9; P =0.021) were independent risk factors for follow-up mortality. CONCLUSION Endovascular repair of rTAAA shows high technical success; the presence of free rupture alone appear not to correlate with early mortality. Effective prevention/management of post-operative complications is crucial for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital "Infermi" Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniel Becker
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola Bologna, Italy
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas, Houston, USA
| | - Bärbel Berekoven
- Clinic for Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital GmbH, Münster, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angelos Karelis
- Vascular Center Malmö, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University,Malmö, Sweden
| | - Andrea Kahlberg
- Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Germano Melissano
- Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center Malmö, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University,Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Austermann
- Clinic for Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital GmbH, Münster, Germany
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola Bologna, Italy
| | - Gustavo Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas, Houston, USA
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Torrealba JI, Grandi A, Nana P, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Dilated Internal Iliac Artery Confers a Higher Risk of Endoleak in Iliac Branch Devices in a Single Centre Retrospective Experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00114-X. [PMID: 38320646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.01.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Iliac branch devices (IBDs) have shown good results but there is little evidence for the risk of internal iliac artery (IIA) endoleak, so there are no clear recommendations on the maximum diameter it should be. Based on limited evidence, it was hypothesised that an IIA of ≥ 11 mm in diameter presents an increased risk of type Ic endoleak. METHODS This was a single centre, retrospective case control study. Patients undergoing an IBD with the main trunk of the IIA as the target vessel, between 2015 and 2021, were identified. Two groups were created: those with a main trunk diameter of < 11 mm; and those with a diameter of ≥ 11 mm. Technical success, freedom from type Ic endoleak, and re-intervention rates were compared. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to show a cutoff IIA diameter value for risk of type Ic endoleak. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the risk of type Ic endoleak and the presence of calcification, stenosis, and landing zone length in the IIA. RESULTS There were 182 IBDs identified. The dilated IIA group (54 IBDs) had significantly lower technical success (91% vs. 98.4%; p = .002), lower freedom from type Ic endoleak (77% vs. 97.1% at 24 months; p = .001), and lower freedom from re-interventions (70% vs. 92.4% at 24 months; p = .002). The ROC curve showed that 10.5 mm was the cutoff diameter for type Ic endoleak. Moderate or severe calcification as well as landing zone length < 5 mm also correlated with type Ic endoleak. CONCLUSION IBDs have a statistically significantly higher rate of technical failure, lower freedom from type Ic endoleak, and lower freedom from re-intervention when the IIA is ≥ 11 mm in diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose I Torrealba
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kölbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N, Antoniou GA, Björck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:192-331. [PMID: 38307694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy. METHODS The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence. RESULTS A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed. CONCLUSION The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
Collapse
|
18
|
Spanos K, Kölbel T. Role of Initial Focal Contrast Enhancement in Type B Intramural Hematoma. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:514-515. [PMID: 38267113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Spanos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nana P, Haulon S, Kölbel T. Evidence on Aortic Arch Aneurysm Diameter Thresholds: Standing on a Wobbly Stepping Stone. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00018-2. [PMID: 38199314 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Centre, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ristow I, Riedel C, Lenz A, Well L, Adam G, Panuccio G, Kölbel T, Bannas P. Current Imaging Strategies in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024; 196:52-61. [PMID: 37699431 DOI: 10.1055/a-2119-6448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as a localized dilatation of the abdominal aorta of ≥ 3 cm. With a prevalence of 4-8 %, AAA is one of the most common vascular diseases in Western society. Radiological imaging is an elementary component in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning of AAA patients. METHOD This is a narrative review article on preoperative imaging strategies of AAA, incorporating expert opinions based on the current literature and standard-of-care practices from our own center. Examples are provided to illustrate clinical cases from our institution. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Radiological imaging plays a pivotal role in the initial diagnosis and monitoring of patients with AAA. Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and surveillance. Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is currently considered the gold standard for preoperative imaging and image-based treatment planning in AAA repair. New non-contrast MR angiography techniques are robustly applicable and allow precise determination of aortic diameters, which is of critical importance, particularly with regard to current diameter-based surgical treatment guidelines. 3D imaging with multiplanar reformation and automatic centerline positioning enables more accurate assessment of the maximum aortic diameter. Modern imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI have the potential to further improve individualized risk stratification in patients with AAA. KEY POINTS · Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and monitoring. · Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is the gold standard for preoperative imaging in AAA repair. · Non-contrast MR angiography allows for accurate monitoring of aortic diameters in AAA patients. · Measurement of aortic diameters is more accurate with 3D-CT/MRI compared to ultrasound. · Research seeks new quantitative imaging biomarkers for AAA risk stratification, e. g., using 4D flow MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inka Ristow
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Riedel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Lenz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lennart Well
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bannas
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Karelis A, Dias NV, Holmström A, Kölbel T, Sonesson B. Inferior Vena Cava-Balloon Occlusion and Its Effect on the Myocardium During Endograft Deployment in the Arch. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30:931-936. [PMID: 35735202 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221105183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of cava balloon occlusion on the myocardium during endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective observational cohort study of 21 patients who underwent endovascular repair of aortic arch and thoracic aorta in a single tertiary referral center with use of inferior vena cava (IVC) balloon occlusion as a method of intraoperative cardiac output reduction. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume index, and central venous oxygen saturation were noted. High-sensitive serum troponin levels were also analyzed according to a pre-established protocol. Endpoints were cardiac troponin T levels after induced hypotension and left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were procedure technical success and overall survival. RESULTS Twenty-one patients (18 male, median age 69, (62-75, IQR)) enrolled in the study between May 2015 and January 2019. Indication for endovascular treatment was an aortic arch aneurysm (n=10), descending aortic aneurysm (n=8), lusorian artery aneurysm (n=2), and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n=1). Median time to reach half mean arterial pressure was 60 seconds while median recovery time of blood pressure was 135 seconds. In 5 (24%) cases, we observed a > 50% change of Troponin T on the reference level. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Two (10%) patients developed new and persistent atrial fibrillation and 1 (5%) suffered a peri-operative ST-elevation myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION The use of IVC balloon occlusion is a feasible technique for cardiac output reduction during endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathologies. One fourth of the patients develop significant troponin leakage but the significance of the finding needs further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelos Karelis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuno V Dias
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anders Holmström
- Department of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Björn Sonesson
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Torrealba JI, Blessing E, Rohlffs F, Panuccio G, Carpenter S, Kölbel T. Single access covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9:101343. [PMID: 37965110 PMCID: PMC10641678 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
We describe the feasibility of covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) through a single femoral access and a steerable sheath. We present the technique, which we used for a patient with severe aortoiliac calcification and bilateral involvement of the common femoral artery. The patient underwent endarterectomy of the left common femoral artery plus CERAB with an aortic stent graft and bilateral covered stents for the common iliac artery with kissing dilatation with a steerable sheath using only left femoral access. CERAB can be performed using unilateral access with the aid of a steerable sheath, reducing the potential for access site complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose I. Torrealba
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erwin Blessing
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Carpenter
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sotir A, Klopf J, Wolf F, Funovics MA, Loewe C, Kölbel T, Neumayer C, Eilenberg W. Early experience with bridging stent graft deployment without sheath support in branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1383-1391.e5. [PMID: 37330151 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the early experience with modified version of simplified bare-wire target vessel (SMART) technique, implying delivery of bridging stent grafts without historically established sheath support, and to compare its outcome to standard endovascular aortic repair procedures with fenestrated/branched devices. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients treated with fenestrated/branched devices from January 2020 to December 2022 was undertaken. The study population was divided into three groups-a sheath group (SG), SMART group, and nonsheath group (NSG). Primary end points were radiation exposure (dose-area product), fluoroscopy time, dose of contrast agent, operation time, and incidence of intraoperative target vessel (TV) complications and additional procedures. Freedom from secondary TV related reinterventions at the three follow-up phases were defined as secondary end points. RESULTS A total of 183 TVs (38.8% visceral arteries [VA]; 56.3% renal arteries [RA]) in the SG, 36 TVs (44.4% VA, 55.6% RA) in the SMART group, and 168 TVs (47.6% VA; 50% RA) in the NSG were accessed. The mean number of fenestrations and bridging stent grafts was equally distributed in all three groups. The SMART group only included cases treated with fenestrated devices. The dose-area product was significantly lower in the SMART (median, 203 Gy × cm2; interquartile range [IQR], 179-365 Gy × cm2) and NSG (median, 340 Gy × cm2; IQR, 220-651 Gy × cm2) groups vs the SG (median, 464 Gy × cm2; IQR, 267-871 Gy × cm2; P = .007). Operation time was also significantly lower in the NSG (median, 265 minutes; IQR, 221-337 minutes) and SMART (median, 292 minutes; IQR, 234-351 minutes) groups vs the SG (median, 326 minutes; IQR, 277-375 minutes; P = .004), respectively. Intraoperative TV-related complications were most frequently observed in the SG (9/183 TVs; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS This study reports the outcomes of three currently available TV stenting approaches. Previously reported SMART technique, and its modified version (NSG) proved to be a safe alternative to historically established TV stenting technique with sheath support (SG).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sotir
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Klopf
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Wolf
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin A Funovics
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Loewe
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Neumayer
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolf Eilenberg
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bertoglio L, Bilman V, Rohlffs F, Panuccio G, Chiesa R, Kölbel T. Self-occluding Candy-Plug: Implantation Technique to Obtain False Lumen Thrombosis in Chronic Aortic Dissections. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30:811-816. [PMID: 35707893 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221102661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the implantation steps of the latest generation of candy-plug device (third CP generation [CP III]) and to illustrate its possible pitfalls by discussing a case in whom this device was employed to occlude the false lumen (FL) of a chronic type B aortic dissection. TECHNIQUE A 69 year-old male patient who underwent a frozen elephant trunk arch repair due to residual type A aortic dissection developed a FL aneurysmal degeneration limited to the descending thoracic aorta. Two thoracic stent-grafts were deployed into the true lumen up to the celiac trunk origin. Then, the FL was occluded with a self-occluding CP III device (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana), placed at the same level as the distal thoracic stent-graft. The distal un-stented sleeve was pushed upward to allow immediate occlusion of its central lumen, avoiding interference with reno-visceral arteries arising from the FL. Both intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and follow-up computed tomographic angiography scan demonstrated complete FL thrombosis. CONCLUSION The introduction of CP III with its self-occluding mechanism helped to shorten and standardize the procedure. However, adjunctive steps may be needed to immediately obtain FL occlusion and avoid hampering the perfusion of vessels arising from the FL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Victor Bilman
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Palmier M, Mougin J, Bendavid J, Fabre D, Kölbel T, Haulon S. Evaluation of false lumen occluders implanted in the abdominal aorta false lumen. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1146-1152. [PMID: 37406944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management of postdissection thoracoabdominal aneurysms with a fenestrated and/or branched endograft (F/BEVAR) is associated with favorable outcomes. Treatment should include both true lumen endografting and false lumen occlusion (FLO). Favorable results have recently been reported for FLO in the false lumen of the thoracic aorta. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of FLO of the abdominal aorta in patients treated for post dissection thoracoabdominal aneurysm. METHODS A multicenter retrospective analysis of prospective data of consecutive patients managed for post dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm from April 2019 to December 2022 with F/BEVAR associated with FLO in the abdominal false lumen was conducted. The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was followed. Baseline demographics, operative details, and early outcomes (mortality, length of stay) were recorded. Primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. FLO technical success was defined as complete occlusion of false lumen backflow above the FLO on completion angiogram. RESULTS During the 3-year study, 23 patients were treated for post dissection thoracoabdominal aneurysm with F/BEVAR and the use of abdominal FLO. Twenty-one patients (91.3%) had received prior endovascular treatment. The technical and clinical success was 95.7%. The abdominal FLO had a technical success rate of 78.3%. The median diameter of the FLO was 34 mm. No patient died during the perioperative period, and one patient had spinal cord ischemia (4.3%) with partial recovery. Six patients (26.1%) required early reintervention. The median duration of hospitalization in the intensive care unit and overall was 1 day (interquartile range, 0-3 days) and 7.5 days (interquartile range, 2-22 days), respectively. During the mean follow-up of 9.9 ± 9.0 months, no patient died. False lumen occlusion was complete or partial in nine (39.1%) and nine (39.1%) patients, respectively. No aortic rupture occurred during follow-up. Maximum aortic diameter decreased in 48% and remained stable in 39% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Abdominal aorta FLO during endovascular treatment of post dissection thoracic abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with favorable outcomes. It offers an additional staging therapeutic option before extensive aorto-bi-iliac coverage, associated with low spinal cord ischemia rates. FLO also provides high rates of false lumen occlusion and false lumen remodeling during follow-up. Longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to confirm these very promising early findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mickael Palmier
- Aortic Center, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Justine Mougin
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital G&R Laënnec, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jeremy Bendavid
- Aortic Center, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Dominique Fabre
- Aortic Center, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Center, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Le Plessis Robinson, France.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Torrealba J, Grandi A, Nana P, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Transfemoral Access to Implant Iliac Branch Devices After Previous Aortic Grafts. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231208657. [PMID: 37902437 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231208657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report on the outcomes of patients undergoing an iliac branch device implantation after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair, using exclusively femoral access for catheterization and delivery of the covering stent to the hypogastric artery. METHODS Single-center retrospective study in which all patients in whom an iliac branch device was implanted after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair were identified. Patients in whom the hypogastric artery catheterization and delivery of the bridging cover stent were achieved via exclusive femoral access were included. Different techniques were used based on surgeon preference. Technical success and access-related complications, as well as iliac branch device endoleak or occlusions during follow-up, were evaluated. RESULTS From 2015 to 2021, 28 patients with a prior open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair underwent 34 iliac branch device implantations. Most (71%) had juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 82% had common iliac artery aneurysms, and 25% had hypogastric artery aneurysms. Bilateral iliac branch device implantations were performed in 21% of the patients, and in 26% of cases, landing in the superior gluteal artery was obtained. An "up-and-over" technique from the contralateral groin was used in 65% of the cases, and a steerable sheath in 35%. Technical success was 94%, with no complications related to access or technique to catheterize and deliver the stents in the hypogastric artery. The cohort had 20% of major complications, with 3 perioperative deaths. Kaplan-Meier estimated an iliac branch device freedom from occlusion and endoleak was 92% and 83% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS The implantation of an iliac branch device over previous aortic or open endografts involving the aortic bifurcation is feasible and safe. We suggest using a femoral approach as the primary access of choice. CLINICAL IMPACT In this study we present 28 patients with previous aortoiliac grafts in which iliac branch devices were performed as a subsequent step.We demonstrated the feasibility of the technique despite the difficulty of crossing a neobifurcation, with a steep angle, without complications associated with the technique. Based on our experience, we recommend transfemoral access as the first option for bypassing the hypogastric artery stent, preserving upper extremity access and its possible complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Torrealba
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Arulrajah K, Spanos K, Panuccio G, Gandet T, Rickers C, Kölbel T. Endovascular Recanalization of Aortic Isthmus Atresia with an "Electrified Wire Technique". J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231206996. [PMID: 37872769 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231206996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE For aortic coarctation in adults endovascular repair is the treatment of choice with an acceptable safety profile. Aortic isthmus atresia is a related condition with a complete occlusion of the aorta not allowing catheterization across the isthmus. This technical note describes a recanalization of an aortic isthmus atresia using radiofrequency with an "electrified wire technique." TECHNIQUE A guidewire was selectively denuded of PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) at the distal end and was placed through a catheter distal to the aortic isthmus atresia. The denuded end of the wire was clamped to an electrosurgery pencil. By pushing the wire toward a tulip-snare, which was placed as a target proximal of the occlusion via left trans-brachial access, and shortly activating of the electrosurgery pencil the electrified wire recanalized the occlusion and was snared and used to guide implantation of a balloon-expandable covered stent. CONCLUSION The electrified wire puncture technique can be used to recanalize adult aortic isthmus atresia after failed conventional attempts. CLINICAL IMPACT The electrified wire technique offers an off-the shelf option to modify standard guidewires for the use with radiofrequency to cross a complete aortic isthmus occlusion after failed conventional attempts. This new technique may be applied also in other situations like dissection flap fenestration, transcaval access and similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kugarajah Arulrajah
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Gandet
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Rickers
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grandi A, Kölbel T, Rohlffs F, Yousef Al Sarhan D, Panuccio G. Ascending Aorta Nose-Cone Loop Technique as Bail Out for Precise Branched Endovascular Aortic Arch Endograft Delivery Without Valve Re-Crossing. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231201532. [PMID: 37822242 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231201532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe a right carotid-femoral through-and-through (T&T) guidewire technique during branched thoracic endovascular aortic arch repair (B-TEVAR) to facilitate endograft delivery in a very tortuous aortic anatomy for a type Ia endoleak (EL) of a previous aortic endograft implantation. TECHNIQUE AT&T guidewire was established between the right common carotid artery and the right common femoral artery to facilitate a difficult endograft delivery. Once in the aortic arch, a loop in the ascending aorta was formed to allow the endograft to reach the desired position without losing tension on the guidewire. This maneuver allowed the T&T guidewire to be kept in place until the desired position was reached. The nose-tip of the endograft was curved over the looped guidewire pointing toward the innominate artery without crossing the valve. After endograft deployment, the T&T guidewire was released, and the branches were bridged in a standard fashion. Completion angiography documented correct deployment of the endograft and no sign of type I/III EL. The 1-month computed tomography angiography confirmed the correct deployment. CONCLUSION Carotid-femoral T&T guidewire to facilitate endograft delivery in difficult anatomies can be feasible even in B-TEVAR. Possible bailout maneuvers are available if the aortic valve needs to be crossed after endograft delivery. CLINICAL IMPACT Endovascular arch repair gains popularity as a valuable alternative, especially in patients considered unfit for open repair. A through-and-through (T&T) guidewire for endovascular arch repair with a landing zone in zone 0 according to Ishimaru is usually performed through the externalization of the femoral guidewire through a transapical access, but this may not always be feasible in frail patients. A right carotid-femoral though-and-through guidewire with a loop formation in the ascending aorta is proposed to achieve the support of a T&T wire to pass tortuous aortoiliac anatomies and access the ascending aorta without the need for aortic valve crossing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daour Yousef Al Sarhan
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tsilimparis N, Gouveia E Melo R, Schanzer A, Sobocinski J, Austermann M, Chiesa R, Resch T, Gargiulo M, Timaran C, Maurel B, Adam D, Dias N, Oderich GS, Kölbel T, Gomez Palones F, Simonte G, Giudice R, Mesnard T, Loschi D, Leone N, Gallito E, Spath P, Porras Cólon J, Elboushi A, Wachtmeister M, Sonesson B, Tenorio E, Panuccio G, Isernia G, Bertoglio L. Transatlantic multicenter study on the use of a modified preloaded delivery system for fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:863-873.e3. [PMID: 37330705 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Analyze the outcomes of endovascular complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the Cook fenestrated device with the modified preloaded delivery system (MPDS) with a biport handle and preloaded catheters. METHODS A multicenter retrospective single arm cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms treated with the MPDS fenestrated device (Cook Medical). Patient clinical characteristics, anatomy, and indications for device use were collected. Outcomes, classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards, were collected at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and annually thereafter. RESULTS Overall, 712 patients (median age, 73 years; interquartile range [IQR], 68-78 years; 83% male) from 16 centers in Europe and the United States treated electively were included: 35.4% (n = 252) presented with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and 64.6% (n = 460) with complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Overall, 2755 target vessels were included (mean ,3.9 per patient). Of these, 1628 were incorporated via ipsilateral preloads using the MPDS (1440 accessed from the biport handle and 188 from above). The mean size of the contralateral femoral sheath during target vessel catheterization was 15F ± 4, and in 41 patients (6.7%) the sheath size was ≤8F. Technical success was 96.1%. Median procedural time was 209 minutes (IQR, 161-270 minutes), contrast volume was 100 mL (IQR, 70-150mL), fluoroscopy time was 63.9 minutes (IQR, 49.7-80.4 minutes) and median cumulative air kerma radiation dose was 2630 mGy (IQR, 838-5251 mGy). Thirty-day mortality was 4.8% (n = 34). Access complications occurred in 6.8% (n = 48) and 30-day reintervention in 7% (n = 50; 18 branch related). Follow-up of >30 days was available for 628 patients (88%), with a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR, 8-39 months). Branch-related endoleaks (type Ic/IIIc) were observed in 15 patients (2.6%) and aneurysm growth of >5 mm was observed in 54 (9.5%). Freedom from reintervention at 12 and 24 months was 87.1% (standard error [SE],1.5%) and 79.2% (SE, 2.0%), respectively. Overall target vessel patency at 12 and 24 months was 98.6% (SE, 0.3%) and 96.8% (SE, 0.4%), respectively, and was 97.9% (SE, 0.4%) and 95.3% (SE, 0.8%) for arteries stented from below using the MPDS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MPDS is safe and effective. Overall benefits include a decrease in contralateral sheath size in the treatment of complex anatomies with favorable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Jonathan Sobocinski
- Aortic Centre, Institut Cœur-Poumon, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Martin Austermann
- Vascular Surgery Department, St. Franziskus Hospital, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Timothy Resch
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS University Hospital Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlos Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Blandine Maurel
- Department of Vascular Surgery, L'institut du Thorax, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Donald Adam
- Complex Aortic Team, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francisco Gomez Palones
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Gioele Simonte
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Rocco Giudice
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Aortic Centre, Institut Cœur-Poumon, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Diletta Loschi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Leone
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Enrico Gallito
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS University Hospital Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Spath
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS University Hospital Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jesus Porras Cólon
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Amro Elboushi
- Complex Aortic Team, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Vascular Surgery Department, Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt
| | - Melker Wachtmeister
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Bjorn Sonesson
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Emanuel Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giacomo Isernia
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical and Clinical Sciences, University and ASST Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abdelhalim MA, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Haulon S, Warren G, Adam D, Claridge M, Butt T, Abisi S, Dias NV, Kölbel T, Gallitto E, Gargiulo M, Gkoutzios P, Panuccio G, Kuzniar M, Mani K, Mees BM, Schurink GW, Sonesson B, Spath P, Wanhainen A, Schanzer A, Beck AW, Schneider DB, Timaran CH, Eagleton M, Farber MA, Modarai B. Multicenter trans-Atlantic experience with fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:854-862.e1. [PMID: 37321524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multicenter international study aimed to describe outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repairs (FB-EVAR) in a cohort of patients treated for chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAAs). METHODS We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for repair of extent I to III PD-TAAAs in 16 centers from the United States and Europe (2008-2021). Data were extracted from institutional prospectively maintained databases and electronic patient records. All patients received off-the-shelf or patient-specific manufactured fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Endpoints were any cause mortality and major adverse events at 30 days, technical success, target artery (TA) patency, freedom from TA instability, minor (endovascular with <12 Fr sheath) and major (open or ≥12 Fr sheath) secondary interventions, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM). RESULTS A total of 246 patients (76% male; median age, 67 years [interquartile range, 61-73 years]) were treated for extent I (7%), extent II (55%), and extent III (35%) PD-TAAAs by FB-EVAR. The median aneurysm diameter was 65 mm (interquartile range, 59-73 mm). Eighteen patients (7%) were octogenarians, 212 (86%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3, and 21 (9%) presented with contained ruptured or symptomatic aneurysms. There were 917 renal-mesenteric vessels targeted by 581 fenestrations (63%) and 336 directional branches (37%), with a mean of 3.7 vessels per patient. Technical success was 96%. Mortality and rate of major adverse events at 30 days was 3% and 28%, including disabling complications such as new onset dialysis in 1%, major stroke in 1%, and permanent paraplegia in 2%. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated patient survival at 3 and 5 years was 79% ± 6% and 65% ± 10%. KM estimated freedom from ARM was 95% ± 3% and 93% ± 5% at the same intervals. Unplanned secondary interventions were needed in 94 patients (38%), including minor procedures in 64 (25%) and major procedures in 30 (12%). There was one conversion to open surgical repair (<1%). KM estimated freedom from any secondary intervention was 44% ± 9% at 5 years. KM estimated primary and secondary TA patency were 93% ± 2% and 96% ± 1% at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR for chronic PD-TAAAs was associated with high technical success and a low rate of mortality (3%) and disabling complications at 30 days. Although the procedure is effective in the prevention of ARM, patient survival was low at 5 years (65%), likely due to the significant comorbidities in this cohort of patients. Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 44%, although most procedures were minor. The significant rate of reinterventions highlights the need for continued patient surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Abdelhalim
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX
| | - Stephan Haulon
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, GHPSJ, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Gasper Warren
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Donald Adam
- Birmingham Vascular Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Claridge
- Birmingham Vascular Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Talha Butt
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Said Abisi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nuno V Dias
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Panos Gkoutzios
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marek Kuzniar
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Barend M Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Björn Sonesson
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paolo Spath
- Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Matthew Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bijan Modarai
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wipper SH, Kölbel T, Dumfarth J, Schelzig H, Estrera AL, Sandhu HK, Enzmann F, Debus ES. A new hybrid graft for open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 12:503-505. [PMID: 37817858 PMCID: PMC10561343 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2023-scp-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Helena Wipper
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Dumfarth
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hubert Schelzig
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Anthony L. Estrera
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Harleen K. Sandhu
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Florian Enzmann
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - E. Sebastian Debus
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Jakimowicz T, Torrealba JI, Jama K, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Urgent and emergent repair of complex aortic aneurysms using an off-the-shelf branched device. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1277459. [PMID: 37808886 PMCID: PMC10556233 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1277459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Endovascular repair using off-the-shelf endografts is a viable solution in patients with ruptured or symptomatic complex aortic aneurysms. This analysis aimed to present the peri-operative and follow-up outcomes in urgent and emergent cases managed with the t-Branch multibranched thoracoabdominal endograft. Methods Prospectively collected data from all consecutive urgent and emergent cases managed in two aortic centers between January 1st, 2014, to November 30th, 2022, using the t-Branch device (Cook Medical Inc., Bjaeverskov, Denmark) were analyzed. Patients presenting with ruptured aortic complex aneurysms were characterized as emergent and patients with aneurysms >90 mm of diameter, or symptomatic aneurysms were characterized as urgent. Technical success, 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rates were assessed. Results 225 patients (36.5% females, 72.5 ± 2.8 years) were included; 73.0% were urgent. The mean aneurysm diameter was 109 ± 3.9 mm and 44.4% were type I-III TAAAs. Females (p = .03), para-renal aneurysms (p = .02) and ASA score IV (p < .001) were more common in emergent cases. Technical success was 97.8%. Thirty-day mortality and MAE rates were 17.8% and 30.6%, respectively. SCI rate was 14.7%, (4.8% paraplegia rate) with 22.2% of patients receiving prophylactic cerebrospinal drainage. Thirty-day mortality (13.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .04) and MAE (26.0% vs. 43.0%, p = .02) were more common among emergent cases while technical success (97.6% vs. 98.3%, p = .9), and SCI (13.3% vs. 18.3%, p = .4) were similar. Survival at 12-months was 83.5% (SE 5.9%) for the urgent and 77.1% (SE 8.2%) for the emergent group (log rank, p = 0.96). Conclusion T-Branch represents an effective and safe solution for the management of urgent and emergent cases with complex aortic aneurysms, with high technical success, promising early mortality and SCI rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jose I. Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Grandi A, Gronert C, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Yousef Al Sarhan D, Kölbel T. Transvenous Access for Emergent Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients Without Femoral Access. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231197972. [PMID: 37688485 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231197972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the technique of transvenous access for emergent endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms exemplified with 2 cases. TECHNIQUE Transvenous access to the aorta is described as an alternative access method to deliver aortic endografts in emergency situations. A 68-year-old female patient with severely compromised iliac and subclavian artery access was treated for a ruptured extent V thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm with a t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) delivered through a transcaval access. To avoid severe aortocaval shunting a balloon-expandable covered stent was deployed through a carotid access due to severe bilateral subclavian ostial stenosis. A 71-year-old man with an acute type B aortic dissection and bilateral narrow long-segment stenting of the iliac arteries was treated with a physician-modified thoracic endovascular aortic repair using an arteriovenous fenestration created at the level of the common iliac artery. We describe the access creation by fenestration using a transseptal needle. CONCLUSION Transvenous access for thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is safe and feasible in selected emergent cases. CLINICAL IMPACT A transvenous approach may be helpful in selected patients when an endovascular repair needs to be performed but no arterial femoral access is available. This approach proved to be feasible even with large-bore introducer sheaths, taking its place in the armamentarium of the vascular surgeon for emergent complex endovascular aortic repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Catharina Gronert
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daour Yousef Al Sarhan
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nana P, Jama K, Kölbel T, Spanos K, Panuccio G, Jakimowicz T, Rohlffs F. Sex-Comparative Outcomes of the T-Branch Device for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5811. [PMID: 37762752 PMCID: PMC10531663 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Females are at increased risk of mortality compared to males after complex endovascular aortic repair. This study aims to examine sex-related peri-operative and follow-up outcomes in patients managed with the t-Branch device. METHODS A two-center retrospective analysis of patients managed with the off-the-shelf t-Branch device (Cook Medical Inc., Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 1 January 2014 and 30 September 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were sex-comparative 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAEs) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI). RESULTS A total of 542 patients were included; 28.0% were females. Urgent repair and type I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysms were more common among females (52.6% vs. 34%, p = 0.01, and 57.1% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.004). Technical success was similar (97.4% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.755), as well as early mortality (16.2% in females vs. 10.8% in males; p = 0.084). SCI rates were similar between groups (13.6% vs. 9.2% p = 0.183). MAEs were more common in females; 33.7% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis did not identify sex as an independent predictor of adverse events. The 12-month survival rate was 75.7% (SE 0.045) for females and 84.1% (SE 0.026) for males (log rank, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS Sex was not detected as an independent factor of mortality, MAEs and SCI within patients managed with the t-Branch device. Feasibility was high in both groups. No significant difference was shown in survival during the 12-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland; (K.J.); (T.J.)
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland; (K.J.); (T.J.)
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Kölbel T, Panuccio G, Jama K, Jakimowicz T, Rohlffs F. Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Females Treated with t-Branch off the Shelf Device. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 95:32-41. [PMID: 37268105 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female sex has been characterized as a risk factor of increased mortality in patients managed for complex aortic aneurysm using endovascular means. This study aimed to present the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of females managed electively or urgently with the t-Branch device and investigate factors affecting the early outcomes. METHODS A 2-center retrospective observational study was conducted including elective and urgent female patients managed with the t-Branch device (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2020. Primary early outcomes included technical success and 30-day mortality and morbidity [spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and acute kidney injury]. Follow-up survival and freedom from reintervention rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS In total, 153 females were included; 81 (52.9%) treated urgently. Urgent patients were older (73.2 ± 8.6 vs. 68.5 ± 6.8 years; P < 0.001) and presented higher previous coronary angioplasty/stenting (16.0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.005) and lower double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 46.3% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.04) rates. Technical success was 97.4%. Early mortality was 16.3% (22% in urgent; 12% in elective; P = 0.2) and SCI and acute kidney injury were diagnosed in 13.7% (11% in urgent; 16% in elective; P = 0.2) and 18.3% (22.2% in urgent; 13.9% in elective; P = 0.18), respectively. Multivariate regression analyses showed that DAPT and b-blockers were related to lower 30-day mortality. DAPT was also preventive for SCI. Survival rates were 68.4% [standard error (SE) 0.07] at 12 months for the urgent and 75.6% (SE 0.09) at 24 months for the elective group (P = 0.14). Freedom from reintervention rates were 81.4% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 64.7% (SE 0.09) at 18 months for the urgent and 81.7% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 75.4% (SE 0.081) at 18 months for the elective group (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS Female patients managed with the t-Branch device for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms in elective and urgent setting presented similar 30-day mortality and SCI rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grandi A, Bertoglio L, Lepidi S, Kölbel T, Mani K, Budtz-Lilly J, DeMartino R, Scali S, Hanna L, Troisi N, Calvagna C, D’Oria M. Risk Prediction Models for Peri-Operative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery with Particular Focus on Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5505. [PMID: 37685573 PMCID: PMC10488165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The present scoping review aims to describe and analyze available clinical data on the most commonly reported risk prediction indices in vascular surgery for perioperative mortality, with a particular focus on ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS A scoping review following the PRISMA Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews was performed. Available full-text studies published in English in PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases (last queried, 30 March 2023) were systematically reviewed and analyzed. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework used to construct the search strings was the following: in patients with aortic pathologies, in particular rAAA (population), undergoing open or endovascular surgery (intervention), what different risk prediction models exist (comparison), and how well do they predict post-operative mortality (outcomes)? RESULTS The literature search and screening of all relevant abstracts revealed a total of 56 studies in the final qualitative synthesis. The main findings of the scoping review, grouped by the risk score that was investigated in the original studies, were synthetized without performing any formal meta-analysis. A total of nine risk scores for major vascular surgery or elective AAA, and 10 scores focusing on rAAA, were identified. Whilst there were several validation studies suggesting that most risk scores performed adequately in the setting of rAAA, none reached 100% accuracy. The Glasgow aneurysm score, ERAS and Vancouver score risk scores were more frequently included in validation studies and were more often used in secondary studies. Unfortunately, the published literature presents a heterogenicity of results in the validation studies comparing the different risk scores. To date, no risk score has been endorsed by any of the vascular surgery societies. CONCLUSIONS The use of risk scores in any complex surgery can have multiple advantages, especially when dealing with emergent cases, since they can inform perioperative decision making, patient and family discussions, and post hoc case-mix adjustments. Although a variety of different rAAA risk prediction tools have been published to date, none are superior to others based on this review. The heterogeneity of the variables used in the different scores impairs comparative analysis which represents a major limitation to understanding which risk score may be the "best" in contemporary practice. Future developments in artificial intelligence may further assist surgical decision making in predicting post-operative adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Grandi
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Randall DeMartino
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Salvatore Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Lydia Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 5NH, UK
| | - Nicola Troisi
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Cristiano Calvagna
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| | - Mario D’Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, 34129 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Olsson KW, Mani K, Burdess A, Patterson S, Scali ST, Kölbel T, Panuccio G, Eleshra A, Bertoglio L, Ardita V, Melissano G, Acharya A, Bicknell C, Riga C, Gibbs R, Jenkins M, Bakthavatsalam A, Sweet MP, Kasprzak PM, Pfister K, Oikonomou K, Heloise T, Sobocinski J, Butt T, Dias N, Tang C, Cheng SWK, Vandenhaute S, Van Herzeele I, Sorber RA, Black JH, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Vincent Z, Khashram M, Eagleton MJ, Pedersen SF, Budtz-Lilly J, Lomazzi C, Bissacco D, Trimarchi S, Huerta A, Riambau V, Wanhainen A. Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Intervention in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:832-839. [PMID: 37314760 PMCID: PMC10267845 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Endovascular treatment is not recommended for aortic pathologies in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) other than in redo operations and as bridging procedures in emergencies. However, recent developments in endovascular technology may challenge this dogma. OBJECTIVE To assess the midterm outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in patients with CTD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For this descriptive retrospective study, data on demographics, interventions, and short-term and midterm outcomes were collected from 18 aortic centers in Europe, Asia, North America, and New Zealand. Patients with CTD who had undergone endovascular aortic repair from 2005 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to November 2022. EXPOSURE All principal endovascular aortic repairs, including redo surgery and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Short-term and midterm survival, rates of secondary procedures, and conversion to open repair. RESULTS In total, 171 patients were included: 142 with Marfan syndrome, 17 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 12 with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). Median (IQR) age was 49.9 years (37.9-59.0), and 107 patients (62.6%) were male. One hundred fifty-two (88.9%) were treated for aortic dissections and 19 (11.1%) for degenerative aneurysms. One hundred thirty-six patients (79.5%) had undergone open aortic surgery before the index endovascular repair. In 74 patients (43.3%), arch and/or visceral branches were included in the repair. Primary technical success was achieved in 168 patients (98.2%), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (5 patients). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 96.2% and 80.6% for Marfan syndrome, 93.8% and 85.2% for Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 75.0% and 43.8% for vEDS, respectively. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 years (1.9-9.2), 91 patients (53.2%) had undergone secondary procedures, of which 14 (8.2%) were open conversions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that endovascular aortic interventions, including redo procedures and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta, in patients with CTD had a high rate of early technical success, low perioperative mortality, and a midterm survival rate comparable with reports of open aortic surgery in patients with CTD. The rate of secondary procedures was high, but few patients required conversion to open repair. Improvements in devices and techniques, as well as ongoing follow-up, may result in endovascular treatment for patients with CTD being included in guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anne Burdess
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Suzannah Patterson
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Salvatore T. Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Eleshra
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ardita
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Germano Melissano
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Amish Acharya
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Bicknell
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Celia Riga
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Gibbs
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Jenkins
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arvind Bakthavatsalam
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Matthew P. Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Piotr M. Kasprzak
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karin Pfister
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kyriakos Oikonomou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, University Hospital Frankfurt and Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tessely Heloise
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jonathan Sobocinski
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Talha Butt
- Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ching Tang
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Stephen W. K. Cheng
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sarah Vandenhaute
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Van Herzeele
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rebecca A. Sorber
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James H. Black
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emanuel R. Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston
| | - Gustavo S. Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston
| | - Zoë Vincent
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Manar Khashram
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Matthew J. Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steen Fjord Pedersen
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sugery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sugery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Chiara Lomazzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Bissacco
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Abigail Huerta
- Vascular Surgery Department, CardioVascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vincent Riambau
- Vascular Surgery Department, CardioVascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tsilimparis N, Bosiers M, Resch T, Torsello G, Austermann M, Rohlffs F, Coates B, Yeh C, Kölbel T. Two-year target vessel-related outcomes following use of off-the-shelf branched endografts for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:289-298. [PMID: 37044318 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and target vessel patency through 2 years following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) repair with the off-the-shelf Zenith t-Branch Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Graft (William Cook Europe). METHODS This post-market observational study was conducted at three European sites with ambispective enrollment from 2012 to 2017. Patients underwent endovascular TAAA repair with the t-Branch graft and bridging stent grafts (BSGs) for the celiac (CA), superior mesenteric (SMA), left renal (LRA), and/or right renal (RRA) arteries. Follow-up was through 2 years, per sites' standard of care. Procedural and 1-year results were reported previously. RESULTS Eighty patients (mean age, 71.0±7.4 years; 70.0% men) were enrolled; six patients had symptomatic TAAAs, and 15 patients had contained ruptures. Technical success was achieved in 98.8% of patients (79/80). Median follow-up was 22.2 months (interquartile range, 9.2-25.1 months). At 24 months, Kaplan-Meier (KM) freedom from all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality were 78.5% and 98.6%, respectively. Beyond 12 months, 38 adverse events occurred in 20 patients, including two aortic ruptures (one study aneurysm and one non-study aneurysm) and six deaths (none aneurysm-related, as reported by the site). Compared with postprocedure, maximum aneurysm diameter decreased (>5 mm) in 84.6% (44/52), remained unchanged in 3.8% (2/52), and increased (>5 mm) in 11.5% (6/52) of patients with imaging follow-up after 12 months. No conversions to open repair, and no t-Branch graft or other endograft component migration or integrity issues were reported. No loss of patency was reported in the t-Branch or iliac limb grafts throughout the study. Throughout study duration, four patients had five imaging-reported BSG compressions, none of which required secondary intervention. KM freedom from secondary intervention was 76.3% at 24 months. Fourteen target vessel-related secondary interventions were performed, primarily consisting of stent placement for endoleak, stenosis, or occlusion. KM freedom from loss of primary patency was 94.8%, 100%, 91.3%, and 89.3% for the CA, SMA, LRA, and RRA, respectively, at 24 months. KM freedom from loss of secondary patency in the CA, SMA, LRA, and RRA were 96.3%, 100%, 98.2%, and 98.3% at 24 months, respectively. A total of 298 vessels were targeted, of which 12 were occluded over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Primary and secondary target vessel patency rates through 2 years demonstrated durable repair with the t-Branch graft in patients treated for symptomatic or asymptomatic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- University Heart and Vascular Surgery Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
| | - Michel Bosiers
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Timothy Resch
- Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giovanni Torsello
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Martin Austermann
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Chyon Yeh
- Cook Research Incorporated, West Lafayette, IN
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- University Heart and Vascular Surgery Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Eleshra A, Haulon S, Bertoglio L, Lindsay T, Rohlffs F, Dias N, Tsilimparis N, Panuccio G, Kölbel T. Custom Made Candy Plug for Distal False Lumen Occlusion in Aortic Dissection: International Experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:50-56. [PMID: 36958480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate early and midterm outcomes of the Candy Plug (CP) technique for distal false lumen (FL) occlusion in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissection (AD) in a more real world cohort of patients from an international multicentre registry. METHODS A multicentre retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive patients from the contributing centres with subacute and chronic AD treated with the CP technique from October 2013 to April 2020 at 18 centres. RESULTS A custom made CP was used in 155 patients (92 males, mean age 62 ± 11 years). Fourteen (9%) presented with ruptured false lumen aneurysms. Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 138 patients (89%). The median hospital stay was 7 days (1 - 77). The 30 day mortality rate was 3% (n = 5). Stroke occurred in four patients (3%). Spinal cord ischaemia occurred in three patients (2%). The 30 day computed tomography angiogram (CTA) confirmed successful CP placement at the intended level in all patients. Early complete FL occlusion was achieved in 120 patients (77%). Early (30 day) CP related re-intervention was required in four patients (3%). The early (30 day) stent graft related re-intervention rate was 8% (n = 12). Follow up CTA was available in 142 patients (92%), with a median follow up of 23 months (6 - 87). Aneurysmal regression was achieved in 68 of 142 patients (47%); the aneurysm diameter remained stable in 69 of 142 patients (49%) and increased in five of 142 patients (4%). A higher rate of early FL occlusion was detected in the largest volume centre patients (50 [88%] vs. 70 [71%] from other centres; p = .019). No other differences in outcome were identified regarding volume of cases or learning curve. CONCLUSION This international CP technique experience confirmed its feasibility and low mortality and morbidity rates. Aortic remodelling and false lumen thrombosis rates were high and support the concept of distal FL occlusion in AD using the CP technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | | | - Luca Bertoglio
- San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Sperimental and Clinical Sciences (DSCS), University and ASST Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nuno Dias
- Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rohlffs F, Grandi A, Panuccio G, Detter C, von Kodolitsch Y, Kölbel T. Endovascular Options for the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch - A Scoping Review. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00316-3. [PMID: 37328096 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The gold standard for aneurysmal repair of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch has been open surgery with an established track record of good results in suitable patients. In recent years, with innovations in the endovascular field alternative endovascular solutions for pathologies of the aortic arch and ascending aorta became available. At first reserved only for highly selected patients unfit for open surgery, endovascular aortic arch repair is now being offered to patients with suitable anatomy in high volume referral centers after discussion in an interdisciplinary team. The present scoping review aims at providing an overview on indications, available devices, technical aspects and feasibility studies of endovascular arch repair both in elective and emergent situations, including also experiences and considerations from our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Detter
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yskert von Kodolitsch
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Brodis A, Kouvelos G, Rickers C, Kozlik-Feldmann R, Giannoukas A, Kölbel T. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Stenting for Aortic Coarctation Management in Adults. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179919. [PMID: 37287255 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endovascular treatment of aortic coarctation (CoA) constitutes a valuable alternative with low morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the technical success, re-intervention, and mortality after stenting for CoA in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement and PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) model were followed. An English literature data search was conducted, using PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, until December 30, 2021. Only studies reporting on stenting, for native or recurrent CoA, in adults were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A proportional meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes. Primary outcomes were technical success, intra-operative pressure gradient and complications, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS Twenty-seven articles (705 patients) were included (64.0% males, 34.0±13.6 years). Native CoA was present in 65.7%. Technical success was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96%-0.99%; p<0.001, I2=9.49%). Six (odds ratio [OR]: 1%; 95% CI, 0.00%-0.02%; p=0.002, I2=0%) ruptures and 10 dissections (OR: 2%; 95% CI, 0.001%-0.02%; p<0.001, I2=0%) were reported. The intra-operative and 30-day mortality were 1% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.02%; p=0.003, I2=0%) and 1% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.02%; p=0.004, I2=0%), respectively. The median follow-up was 29 months. Sixty-eight re-interventions (OR: 8%; 95% CI, 0.05%-0.10%; p<0.001, I2=35.99%) were performed; 95.5% were endovascular. Seven deaths were reported (OR: 2%; 95% CI, 0.00%-0.03%; p=0.008, I2=0%). CONCLUSION Stenting for CoA in adults presents high technical success and the intra-operative and 30-day mortality rates were acceptable. During the midterm follow-up, the re-intervention rate was acceptable, and mortality was low. CLINICAL IMPACT Aortic coarctation is a quite common heart defect that may be diagnosed in adult patients, as a first diagnosis in native cases or as a recurrent after previous repair. Endovascular management using plain angioplasty has been associated to a high intra-operative complication and re-intervention rate. Stenting in this analysis seems to be safe and effective as is related a high technical success rate, exceeding 95%, with a low intra-operative complication and death rate. During the mid-term follow-up, the re-interventions rate is estimated at less than 10% while most cases are managed using endovascular means. Further analyses are needed on the impact of stent type on endovascular repair outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexandros Brodis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - George Kouvelos
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Carsten Rickers
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Athanasios Giannoukas
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kölbel T, Nana P, Torrealba JI, Panuccio G, Behrendt CA, Spanos K. The Association of Sarcopenia and ASA Score to Spinal Cord Ischemia in Patients Treated With the t-Branch Device. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179414. [PMID: 37282511 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sarcopenia has been identified as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and may also affect outcomes in patients with complex aortic pathologies. The aim of this study was to assess sarcopenia, combined with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, as predictors for spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in patients treated with the t-Branch off-the-shelf device. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted including elective and urgent patients managed with the t-Branch device (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020. Data were collected according to the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. The psoas muscle area (cm2) and attenuation (Hounsfield units, HU) were measured in the arterial phase of the pre-operative computed tomography angiography for each patient. The lean psoas muscle area (LPMA) was used to stratify patients into 3 groups, and further stratification was performed with a combination of the ASA score and LPMA. RESULTS Eighty patients were included (mean age at 71±9 years; 62.5% males). Thoracoabdominal aneurysms were managed in 72.5% of cases (42.5% for type I-III). Thirty-seven (46%) were treated urgently. Eleven patients died within 30 days (14%). Twelve patients (15%) presented SCI of any severity. Among the LPMA groups, the only statistically significant difference was recorded in age; group 3 was older compared with groups 1 and 2 (67.1 years vs 72.1 years vs 73.5 years, p=0.004). After ASA combined LPMA categorization, 28 patients were considered as low risk, 16 as moderate risk, and 36 as high risk. A statistically significant difference was recorded in terms of SCI (3.5% [1/28] in low risk vs 12.5% [2/16] in moderate risk vs 25% [9/36] in high risk, p=0.049). Multivariate analysis showed that moderate-risk patients were at risk to evolve to SCI (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Low-risk patients, with ASA score I-II or LPMA>350cm2HU, are at lower risk for developing SCI after BEVAR using the t-Branch device. Patients' stratification according to the combination of ASA score and psoas muscle area and attenuation may identify a group at higher risk of SCI after branched endovascular aneurysm repair. CLINICAL IMPACT Sarcopenia has been identified as a factor of increased mortality in patients managed for aortic aneurysm repair. However, significant heterogeneity has been recorded in the tools assessing its presence. In this analysis, an already used method, combining the ASA score and psoas muscle area and attenuation, has been used to assess the impact of sarcopenia in patients managed with the t-branch device. This analysis showed that patients at low risk, with an ASA score I-II or LPMA>350cm2HU were at lower risk to evolve spinal cord ischemia. Along this line, sarcopenia may be a valuable marker for the prediction of perioperative adverse events , other than mortality, in patients managed using complex endovascular repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petroula Nana
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Jose I Torrealba
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Czerny M, Gross-Fengels W, Harloff A, Janosi RA, Kölbel T, Mahnken A, Raddatz A, Rylski B, Schmidt S, Schneider W, Teske A, Berger T. [Not Available]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71:S107-S136. [PMID: 37220772 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1763500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Czerny
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg-Universitäts-Herzzentrum, Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie (DGTHG)
| | | | - Andreas Harloff
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Klinik für Neurologie und Klinische Neurophysiologie (DGN)
| | - Rolf Alexander Janosi
- Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie am Westdeutschen Herz- und Gefäßzentrum (DGK)
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg - Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum (DGG)
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Universitätsklinikum Gießen/Marburg, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie am (DeGIR)
| | - Alexander Raddatz
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie (DGAI)
| | - Bartosz Rylski
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg-Universitäts-Herzzentrum, Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie (DGTHG)
| | | | | | | | - Tim Berger
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg-Universitäts-Herzzentrum, Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie (DGTHG)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nana P, Kölbel T, Behrendt CA, Kouvelos G, Giannoukas A, Haulon S, Spanos K. Systematic review of reintervention with fenestrated or branched devices after failed previous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1806-1814.e2. [PMID: 36375726 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A proximal seal extension, after previously failed standard endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), has been described using various endovascular techniques. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the technical success, 30-day mortality, and mortality and reintervention rates during the available follow-up for patients managed with endovascular methods after failed endovascular repair. METHODS The present systematic review followed the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement and was preregistered at PROSPERO (no. CRD42022350436). A search of the English literature, via Ovid, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, until June 15, 2022, was performed. Observational studies (2000-2022) and case series with at least five patients who had undergone fenestrated/branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) after failed EVAR were considered eligible. Technical success and mortality at 30 days and the mortality and reintervention rates during available follow-up had to have been reported. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome was technical success and mortality at 30 days. RESULTS The initial search yielded 2558 reports. Ten studies were considered eligible, two of which were prospective. A total of 423 patients had undergone F/BEVAR after failed EVAR. The indication for reintervention was the presence of a type Ia endoleak in 44.9%. Technical success was reported in seven studies, and 319 of 336 interventions were considered successful (94.9%), according to each study's criteria. Of the 423 patients, 10 had died within 30 days (2.4%). Seven patients had presented with spinal cord ischemia (2.4%). Twenty-three acute kidney injury events were reported (6.8%). The mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 1-77 months). During follow-up, 47 deaths were reported (14.8%). Finally, 50 reinterventions of 303 procedures (16.5%) had been performed. CONCLUSIONS According to the available literature, F/BEVAR after failed EVAR can be performed with high technical success and low mortality during the perioperative period. The midterm mortality and reintervention rates were acceptable. However, further data are needed to provide firm conclusions regarding the safety and durability of F/BEVAR after failed EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France.
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - George Kouvelos
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Giannoukas
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Stephan Haulon
- Aortic Center, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany; Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Grandi A, Melloni A, D'Oria M, Lepidi S, Bonardelli S, Kölbel T, Bertoglio L. Emergent endovascular treatment options for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Semin Vasc Surg 2023; 36:174-188. [PMID: 37330232 DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Grandi
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Melloni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia School of Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste Azienda sanitaria universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste Azienda sanitaria universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy
| | - Stefano Bonardelli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia School of Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia School of Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bertoglio L, Oderich G, Melloni A, Gargiulo M, Kölbel T, Adam DJ, Di Marzo L, Piffaretti G, Agrusa CJ, Van den Eynde W. Multicentre International Registry of Open Surgical Versus Percutaneous Upper Extremity Access During Endovascular Aortic Procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:729-737. [PMID: 36740094 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate access failure (AF) and stroke rates of aortic procedures performed with upper extremity access (UEA), and compare results of open surgical vs. percutaneous UEA techniques with closure devices. METHODS A physician initiated, multicentre, ambispective, observational registry (SUPERAXA - NCT04589962) was carried out of patients undergoing aortic procedures requiring UEA, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement, aortic arch, and thoraco-abdominal aortic endovascular repair, pararenal parallel grafts, renovisceral and iliac vessel repair. Only vascular procedures performed with an open surgical or percutaneous (with a suture mediated vessel closure device) UEA were analysed. Risk factors and endpoints were classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery and VARC-3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium) reporting standards. A logistic regression model was used to identify AF and stroke risk predictors, and propensity matching was employed to compare the UEA closure techniques. RESULTS Sixteen centres registered 1 098 patients (806 men [73.4%]; median age 74 years, interquartile range 69 - 79 years) undergoing vascular procedures using open surgical (76%) or percutaneous (24%) UEA. Overall AF and stroke rates were 6.8% and 3.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of AF by multivariable analysis included pacemaker ipsilateral to the access (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 12.1; p = .026), branched and fenestrated procedure (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 9.6; p = .019) and introducer internal diameter ≥ 14 F (OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.1 - 20.7; p = .001). Stroke was associated with female sex (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3 - 9.0; p = .013), vessel diameter > 7 mm (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 - 13.8; p = .037), and aortic arch procedure (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.7 - 31.1; p = .007). After 1:1 propensity matching, there was no difference between open surgical and percutaneous cohorts. However, a statistically significantly higher number of adjunctive endovascular procedures was recorded in the percutaneous cohort (p < .001). CONCLUSION AF and stroke rates during complex aortic procedures employing UEA are non-negligible. Therefore, selective use of UEA is warranted. Percutaneous access with vessel closure devices is associated with similar complication rates, but more adjunctive endovascular procedures are required to avoid surgical exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Gustavo Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Melloni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Centre, University Heart and Vascular Centre, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Donald J Adam
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Luca Di Marzo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Christopher J Agrusa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wouter Van den Eynde
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Behrendt CA, Thomalla G, Rimmele DL, Petersen EL, Twerenbold R, Debus ES, Kölbel T, Blankenberg S, Schmidt-Lauber C, Peters F, Zyriax BC. Editor's Choice - Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, and Risk Factors in the Hamburg City Health Study: A Cross Sectional Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:590-598. [PMID: 36634745 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a paucity of current figures on the prevalence of carotid and lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as well as the associated cardiovascular risk factors to support considerations on screening programmes. METHODS In the population based Hamburg City Health Study, participants between 45 and 74 years were randomly recruited. In the current cross sectional analysis of the first 10 000 participants enrolled between February 2016 and November 2018, the prevalence of carotid artery disease (intima-media thickness ≥ 1 mm), lower extremity PAD (ankle brachial index ≤ 0.9), and AAA (aortic diameter ≥ 30 mm) was determined. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to determine the association between vascular diseases and risk factors. To account for missing values, multiple imputation was performed. RESULTS A total of 10 000 participants were analysed (51.1% females, median age 63 years, median body mass index 26.1 kg/m2). In medians, the intima media thickness was 0.74 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0.65 - 0.84), the ankle brachial index 1.04 (IQR 0.95 - 1.13), and the aortic diameter 17.8 mm (IQR 16.1 - 19.6). Concerning risk factors, 64% self reported any smoking, 39% hypertension, 5% coronary artery disease, 3% congestive heart failure, 5% atrial fibrillation, and 3% history of stroke or myocardial infarction, respectively. In males, the prevalence of carotid artery disease, lower extremity PAD, and AAA were 35.3%, 22.7%, and 1.3%, respectively, and in females, 23.4%, 24.8%, and 0.2%, respectively. Higher age and current smoking were likewise associated with higher prevalence while the impact of variables varied widely. CONCLUSION In this large population based cohort study of 10 000 subjects from Hamburg, Germany, a strikingly high prevalence of PAD was revealed. Almost 45% suffered from any index disease, while AAA was only diagnosed in 1.3% of males and 0.2% of females. The high prevalence of atherosclerotic disease and associated cardiovascular risk factors underline that it is essential to increase awareness and fuel efforts for secondary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Centre of Cardiovascular Science, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Asklepios Clinic Wandsbek, Asklepios Medical School, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Götz Thomalla
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David L Rimmele
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elina L Petersen
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Population Health Research Department, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raphael Twerenbold
- University Centre of Cardiovascular Science, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Germany; Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eike S Debus
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Population Health Research Department, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Frederik Peters
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Birgit-Christiane Zyriax
- Midwifery Science-Health Services Research and Prevention, Institute for Health Service Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Czerny M, Gross-Fengels W, Harloff A, Janosi RA, Kölbel T, Mahnken A, Raddatz A, Rylski B, Schmidt S, Schneider W, Teske A, Berger T. Guideline Summary: Treatment of acute and chronic diseases of the thoracic aorta - aortic arch. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71:239-242. [PMID: 36948216 DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-5260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
no abstract available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Czerny
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Harloff
- Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Alexander Janosi
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, Essen, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany, Marburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Raddatz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, German, Homburg, Germany
| | - Bartosz Rylski
- Univ Cardiovasc Ctr Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schmidt
- Kerckhoff Heart & Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, German, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Teske
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany., Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tim Berger
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Eleshra A, Oderich GS, McWilliams RG, Panuccio G, Katsargyris A, Tsilimparis N, Tenorio ER, Fisher RK, Verhoeven E, Kölbel T. Endovascular Preservation of Segmental Arteries During Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Fenestrated/Branched Stent-Grafts: Feasibility and outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023:S1051-0443(23)00201-4. [PMID: 36889436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate technical success, feasibility, and outcomes of endovascular preservation of segmental arteries (SAs) during fenestrated /branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR). METHODS A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients treated with F/B-EVAR and a branch or fenestration for SA preservation. Eleven patients (median age 57, range 45-73; 7 men) were included. RESULTS Twelve SAs were preserved. Stent-grafts were custom-made with fenestrations, branches, or a combination of both in 1, 2, and 5 patients. A t-branch was used in 2 patients and physician-modified thoracic stent-graft with a branch was used in 1 patient. Eight branches and 4 fenestrations were used for the preservation of 12 SAs. Four fenestrations and 1 branch for SAs were not bridged and were left for the perfusion of the corresponding SAs. Technical success was achieved in 10/11 (91%) patients. No early mortality occurred. Early morbidities included renal insufficiency without dialysis in 1 patient and partially delayed paraplegia in 1 patient. Pre-discharge computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed patency of all SAs. No early aortic-related re-interventions were required. The median follow-up was 30 (range 10-88) months. Late death occurred in 1 patient. Two SAs occluded in 1 patient with two un-stented fenestrations at 1-year follow-up CTA. This patient did not develop spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Other SAs remained patent during follow-up. One patient with type IIIc endoleak was treated by relining of bridging stents. CONCLUSION Endovascular preservation of SAs with F/B-EVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is feasible and safe in selected patients and may add to preventive measures for SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Athanasios Katsargyris
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Robert K Fisher
- Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Verhoeven
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sörelius K, Wyss TR, Adam D, Beck AW, Berard X, Budtz-Lilly J, Chakfé N, Clough R, Czerny M, D'Oria M, Dang M, di Summa PG, Eldrup N, Fourneau I, Heinola I, Hosaka A, Hsu RB, Huang YK, Jutidamrongphan W, Kan CD, Kölbel T, Lau C, Lawaetz M, Mani K, Moulakakis K, Oderich GS, Resch T, Schmidli J, Sedivy P, Shirasu T, Suwannanon R, Szeberin Z, Touma J, van den Berg JC, Veger H, Wanhainen A, Weiss S. Editor's Choice - Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definition, Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting Standards. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:323-329. [PMID: 36470311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is no consensus regarding the terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, or reporting standards for the disease of infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA), previously known as mycotic aneurysm. The aim of this study was to establish this by performing a consensus study. METHODS The Delphi methodology was used. Thirty-seven international experts were invited via mail to participate. Four two week Delphi rounds were performed, using an online questionnaire, initially with 22 statements and nine reporting items. The panellists rated the statements on a five point Likert scale. Comments on statements were analysed, statements revised, and results presented in iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the panel selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" on the Likert scale, and consensus on the final assessment was defined as Cronbach's alpha coefficient > .80. RESULTS All 38 panellists completed all four rounds, resulting in 100% participation and agreement that this study was necessary, and the term INAA was agreed to be optimal. Three more statements were added based on the results and comments of the panel, resulting in a final 25 statements and nine reporting items. All 25 statements reached an agreement of ≥ 87%, and all nine reporting items reached an agreement of 100%. The Cronbach's alpha increased for each consecutive round (round 1 = .84, round 2 = .87, round 3 = .90, and round 4 = .92). Thus, consensus was reached for all statements and reporting items. CONCLUSION This Delphi study established the first consensus document on INAA regarding terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, as well as reporting standards. The results of this study create essential conditions for scientific research on this disease. The presented consensus will need future amendments in accordance with newly acquired knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Sörelius
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Thomas R Wyss
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Kantonsspital Winterthur, Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Donald Adam
- University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam W Beck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Xavier Berard
- Vascular and General Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nabil Chakfé
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, and GEPROMED Strasbourg, France
| | - Rachel Clough
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London UK, and Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin Czerny
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Centre Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, Italy
| | - Michael Dang
- Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Pietro G di Summa
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nikolaj Eldrup
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inge Fourneau
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ivika Heinola
- Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Akihiro Hosaka
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Warissara Jutidamrongphan
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Chung-Dann Kan
- College of Medicine, National Cheng-Kung University and National Cheng-Kung University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Martin Lawaetz
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy Resch
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jürg Schmidli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Petr Sedivy
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Takuro Shirasu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ruedeekorn Suwannanon
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand
| | - Zoltan Szeberin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Joseph Touma
- Vascular Surgery Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Jos C van den Berg
- Centro Vascolare Ticino, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland; Universitätsinstitut für Diagnostische, Interventionelle und Pädiatrische Radiologie, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hugo Veger
- Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Salome Weiss
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|