1
|
Mesnard T, Vacirca A, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Sulzer TAL, Savadi S, Kanamori LR, Tenorio ER, Mirza A, Saqib N, Mendes BC, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Prospective evaluation of upper extremity access and total transfemoral approach during fenestrated and branched endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:1013-1023.e3. [PMID: 38141739 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Total transfemoral (TF) access has been increasingly used during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR). However, it is unclear whether the potential decrease in the risk of cerebrovascular events is offset by increased procedural difficulties and other complications. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of FB-EVAR using a TF vs upper extremity (UE) approach for target artery incorporation. METHODS We analyzed the clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial in two centers to investigate the use of FB-EVAR for treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) between 2013 and 2022. Patients were classified into TF or UE access group with a subset analysis of patients treated using designs with directional branches. End points were technical success, procedural metrics, 30-day cerebrovascular events defined as stroke or transient ischemic attack, and any major adverse events (MAEs). RESULTS There were 541 patients (70% males; mean age, 74 ± 8 years) treated by FB-EVAR with 2107 renal-mesenteric TAs incorporated. TF was used in175 patients (32%) and UE in 366 patients (68%) including 146 (83%) TF and 314 (86%) UE access patients who had four or more TAs incorporated. The use of a TF approach increased from 8% between 2013 and 2017 to 31% between 2018 and 2020 and 96% between 2021 and 2022. Compared with UE access patients, TF access patients were more likely to have CAAAs (37% vs 24%; P = .002) as opposed to TAAAs. Technical success rate was 96% in both groups (P = .96). The use of the TF approach was associated with reduced fluoroscopy time and procedural time (each P < .05). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.6% for TF and 1.4% for UE (P = .67). There was no early cerebrovascular event in the TF group, but the incidence was 2.7% for UE patients (P = .035). The incidence of MAEs was also lower in the TF group (9% vs 18%; P = .006). Among 237 patients treated using devices with directional branches, there were no significant differences in outcomes except for a reduced procedural time for TF compared with UE access patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS TF access was associated with a decreased incidence of early cerebrovascular events and MAEs compared with UE access for target artery incorporation. Procedural time was decreased in TF access patients irrespective of the type of stent graft design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Mesnard
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Titia A L Sulzer
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Safa Savadi
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Lucas Ruiter Kanamori
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aleem Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS. In or Out? What Are You Looking For? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024:S1078-5884(24)00372-1. [PMID: 38685309 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D'Oria M, Lima GBB, Dias N, Parlani G, Farber M, Tsilimparis N, DeMartino R, Timaran C, Kolbel T, Gargiulo M, Milner R, Melissano G, Maldonado T, Mani K, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS. Outcomes of "Anterior Versus Posterior Divisional Branches of the Hypogastric Artery as Distal Landing Zone for Iliac Branch Devices": The International Multicentric R3OYAL Registry. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31:282-294. [PMID: 36113081 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221120513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this multicentric registry was to assess the outcomes of "anteRior versus posteRior divisional bRanches Of the hYpogastric artery as distAl landing zone for iLiac branch devices (R3OYAL)." METHODS The main exposure of interest for the purpose of this study was the internal iliac artery (IIA) divisional branch (anterior vs posterior) that was used as distal landing zone. Early endpoints included technical success and adverse events. Late endpoints included survival, primary/secondary IIA patency, and IIA branch instability. RESULTS A total of 171 patients were included in the study, of which 50 received bilateral implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs). This resulted in a total of 221 incorporated IIAs included in the final analysis, of which 40 were anterior divisional branches and 181 were posterior divisional branches. Technical success was high in both groups (anterior division: 98% vs posterior division: 100%, P = .18). Occurrence of any adverse event was noted in 14% of patients in both groups (P = 1.0). The overall rate of freedom from the composite IBD branch instability did not show significant differences between patients receiving distal landing in the anterior or posterior division of the IIA at 3 years (79% vs 87%, log-rank test = .215). The 3-year estimates of IBD patency were significantly lower in patients who received distal landing in the anterior divisional branch than those who received distal landing in the posterior divisional branch (primary patency: 81% vs 96%, log-rank test = .009; secondary patency: 81% vs 97%, log-rank test < .001). CONCLUSIONS The use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the IIA as distal landing zone for IBD implantation shows comparable profiles in terms of immediate technical success, perioperative safety, and side-branch instability up to 3 years. However, IBD patency at 3 years was higher when the distal landing zone was achieved within the posterior divisional branch of the IIA. CLINICAL IMPACT The results from this large multicentric registry confirm that use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the internal iliac artery (IIA) as distal landing zone for implantation of iliac branch devices (IBD) shows comparable profiles of safety and feasibility, thereby allowing to extend the indications for endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms to cases with unsuitable anatomy within the IIA main trunk. Although mid-term rates of device durability and branch instability seem to be similar, the rates of primary and secondary IBD patency at three years was favored when the distal landing zone was achieved in the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Guilherme B B Lima
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nuno Dias
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Vascular Centre, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Giambattista Parlani
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Mark Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Randall DeMartino
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Carlos Timaran
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tilo Kolbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Centre, University Heart and Vascular Centre, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS University Hospital, Policlinico S. Orsola and University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ross Milner
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Germano Melissano
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Maldonado
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Mani
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barbosa-Lima GB, Oderich GS, Dias-Neto M, Tenorio ER, Marcondes GB, Mendes BC, Ozbek P, Macedo TA. Effectiveness of Intra-operative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Assessment to Optimize Type II Endoleak Embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:354-359. [PMID: 38153421 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03636-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the effectiveness of type II endoleaks (T2E) embolization using intra-operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS Consecutive patients treated for T2E underwent a standardized protocol with trans-arterial or trans-lumbar access, large volume embolization, onlay fusion, and intra-operative CEUS. Technical success was defined by exclusion of endoleak by CEUS. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (mean age 81 ± 11 years old; 89% male) were treated. The mean aneurysm sac enlargement was 11 ± 8 mm from T2E diagnosis. Embolization was performed using Onyx® 18 in all patients with adjunctive coils in 13 patients (50%). After the first embolization, CEUS documented residual T2E in 13 patients (50%). Ten patients (38%) had additional embolization, which successfully eradicated the T2E in seven of them. Technical success was 50% after the first embolization attempt and 77% after additional attempts guided by CEUS (P = 0.080). There was no mortality. Median imaging follow-up was 22 months. Among the 20 patients with no residual T2E on completion CEUS, 16 (80%) had sac stabilization and none required additional interventions for T2E. Of the six patients with residual T2Es on CEUS, three had sac stabilization (50%) and one required additional reintervention for T2E. There was one late aortic rupture at 56 months. CONCLUSION One in two patients treated by T2E embolization had residual endoleak on intra-operative CEUS after a first embolization attempt, decreasing to one in four patients after multiple attempts. A negative completion CEUS following embolization was associated with higher rates of sac stabilization and no need for additional T2E embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme B Barbosa-Lima
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Giulianna B Marcondes
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Pinar Ozbek
- Diagnostic Imaging, General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steadman JA, Tenorio ER, Chait J, Vierkant RA, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Preoperative predictors of nonhome discharge after fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:469-477.e3. [PMID: 37956958 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonhome discharge (NHD) has significant implications for patient counseling and discharge planning and is frequently required following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of NHD after elective FB-EVAR for CAAA and TAAA and develop a risk calculator able to predict NHD. METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing FB-EVAR between January 2007 and December 2021 at a single institution was performed. Exclusion criteria were admission from a nonhome setting, emergency and repeat FB-EVAR, and discharge to an unknown destination. The cohort was randomly split into separate development (70% of patients) and validation (30%) cohorts to develop a predictive calculator for NHD. Independent variables associated with NHD were assessed in a series of logistic regression analyses from 100 bootstrapped samples of the development set, and a model was developed using the most predictive variables. Resulting parameter estimates were applied to data in the validation set to assess model discrimination and calibration. RESULTS From the initial cohort of 712 FB-EVAR patients, 644 were included in the study (74% male; mean age, 75.4 ± 7.6 years), including 452 with CAAA (70%) and 192 with TAAA (30%). Early mortality occurred in eight patients (1.2%; 5 in CAAA and 3 in TAAA) and the median hospital stay was 5 days (4 for CAAA and 7 for TAAA). Ninety-seven patients (15%) had a NHD. On multivariable analysis, older age (per year, odds ratio [OR], 1.08; P < .001), female gender (OR, 3.03; P < .001), smoking (OR, 2.86; P = .01), congestive heart failure (OR, 3.05; P = .004), peripheral artery disease (OR, 1.81; P = .07), and extent I (OR, 3.17), II (OR, 2.84), and III (OR, 2.52; all P = .08) TAAAs were associated with an increased likelihood of NHD in the development set. Based on these factors, the risk calculator was developed which accurately predicts NHD in the validation set with an area under the curve of 0.7. CONCLUSIONS Older, female smokers with congestive heart failure and peripheral artery disease and more extensive aneurysms are at highest risk of NHD after FB-EVAR. Using only preoperative factors, our risk calculator can predict accurately who will have a NHD, allowing enhanced preoperative patient counselling and accelerated hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Steadman
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiovascular and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Jesse Chait
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiovascular and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sulzer TAL, Macedo TA, Strissel N, Hesley GK, Lekah A, Tallarita T, Dias-Neto M, Huang Y, Tenorio ER, Vacirca A, Mesnard T, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Savadi S, de Bruin JL, Verhagen HJM, Mendes B, Oderich GS. Changes in renal-mesenteric duplex ultrasound velocities after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1162-1169.e2. [PMID: 37453587 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stenting of renal and mesenteric vessels may result in changes in velocity measurements due to arterial compliance, potentially giving rise to confusion about the presence of stenosis during follow-up. The aim of our study was to compare preoperative and postoperative changes in peak systolic velocity (PSV, cm/s) after placement of the celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and renal artery (RAs) bridging stent grafts during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS Patients were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized single-center study to evaluate FB-EVAR for treatment of complex AAA and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms between 2013 and 2020. Duplex ultrasound examination of renal-mesenteric vessels were obtained prospectively preoperatively and at 6 to 8 weeks after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound examination was performed by a single vascular laboratory team using a predefined protocol including PSV measurements obtained with <60° angles. All renal-mesenteric vessels incorporated by bridging stent grafts using fenestrations or directional branches were analyzed. Target vessels with significant stenosis in the preoperative exam were excluded from the analysis. The end point was variations in PSV poststent placement at the origin, proximal, and mid segments of the target vessels for fenestrations and branches. RESULTS There were 419 patients (292 male; mean age, 74 ± 8 years) treated by FB-EVAR with 1411 renal-mesenteric targeted vessels, including 260 CAs, 409 SMAs, and 742 RAs. No significant variances in the mean PSVs of all segments of the CA, SMA, and RAs at 6 to 8 weeks after surgery were found as compared with the preoperative values (CA, 135 cm/s vs 141 cm/s [P = .06]; SMA, 128 cm/s vs 125 cm/s [P = .62]; RAs, 90 cm/s vs 83 cm/s [P = .65]). Compared with baseline preoperative values, the PSV of the targeted vessels showed no significant differences in the origin and proximal segment of all vessels. However, the PSV increased significantly in the mid segment of all target vessels after stent placement. CONCLUSIONS Stent placement in nonstenotic renal and mesenteric vessels during FB-EVAR is not associated with a significant increase in PSVs at the origin and proximal segments of the target vessels. Although there is a modest but significant increase in velocity measurements in the mid segment of the stented vessel, this difference is not clinically significant. Furthermore, PSVs in stented renal and mesenteric arteries were well below the threshold for significant stenosis in native vessels. These values provide a baseline or benchmark for expected PSVs after renal-mesenteric stenting during FB-EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titia A L Sulzer
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| | | | | | | | | | - Marina Dias-Neto
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Safa Savadi
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Jorg L de Bruin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meertens MM, Tenorio ER, Lemmens CC, Marcondes GB, Lima GBB, Schurink GWH, Mendes BC, Oderich GS, Mees BME. Safety of Percutaneous Femoral Access for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Through Previously Surgically Exposed or Repaired Femoral Arteries. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30:730-738. [PMID: 35514295 PMCID: PMC10503241 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221092980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Percutaneous femoral artery access is being increasingly used in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The technique can be challenging in patients with previously surgically exposed or repaired femoral arteries because of excessive scar tissue. However, a successful percutaneous approach may cause less morbidity than a "re-do" open femoral approach. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of prior open surgical femoral exposure on technical success and clinical outcomes of percutaneous approach. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent percutaneous EVAR between 2010 and 2020 at 2 major aortic centers. Patients were divided into 2 groups (with or without prior open surgical femoral access) for analysis of clinical outcomes. Only punctures with sheaths ≥12Fr were included for analysis. The access and (pre)closure techniques were similar in both institutions. Primary end points were intraoperative technical success, access-related revision, and access complications. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify determinants of conversion to open approach and femoral access complications in intact and re-do groins. RESULTS A total of 632 patients underwent percutaneous (complex) EVAR: 98 had prior open surgical femoral access and 534 patients underwent de novo femoral percutaneous access. A total of 1099 femoral artery punctures were performed: 149 in re-do and 950 in intact groins. The extent of endovascular repair included 159 infrarenal, 82 thoracic, 368 fenestrated/branched, and 23 iliac branch devices. No significant differences were seen in technical success (re-do 93.3% vs intact 95.3%, p=0.311), access-related surgical revision (0.7% vs 0.6%, p=0.950), and access complications (2.7% vs 4.0%, p=0.443). For the whole group, significant predictors for access complications in multivariate analyses were main access site (odds ratio [OR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07%-5.35%; p=0.033) and increase of the procedure time per hour (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.34%-2.04%; p<0.001), while increase in sheath-vessel ratio had a protective effect (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.127%-0.85%; p=0.021). Surgical conversion was predicted by main access site (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.28%-4.19%; p=0.007) and calcification of 50% to 75% of the circumference of the access vessel (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.38%-7.86%; p=0.005). CONCLUSION Within our population prior open surgical femoral artery exposure or repair had no negative impact on the technical success and clinical outcomes of percutaneous (complex) endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M. Meertens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Emanuel R. Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charlotte C. Lemmens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Giulianna B. Marcondes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilherme B. B. Lima
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Geert Willem H. Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Bernardo C. Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gustavo S. Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barend M. E. Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abdelhalim MA, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Haulon S, Warren G, Adam D, Claridge M, Butt T, Abisi S, Dias NV, Kölbel T, Gallitto E, Gargiulo M, Gkoutzios P, Panuccio G, Kuzniar M, Mani K, Mees BM, Schurink GW, Sonesson B, Spath P, Wanhainen A, Schanzer A, Beck AW, Schneider DB, Timaran CH, Eagleton M, Farber MA, Modarai B. Multicenter trans-Atlantic experience with fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:854-862.e1. [PMID: 37321524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multicenter international study aimed to describe outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repairs (FB-EVAR) in a cohort of patients treated for chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAAs). METHODS We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for repair of extent I to III PD-TAAAs in 16 centers from the United States and Europe (2008-2021). Data were extracted from institutional prospectively maintained databases and electronic patient records. All patients received off-the-shelf or patient-specific manufactured fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Endpoints were any cause mortality and major adverse events at 30 days, technical success, target artery (TA) patency, freedom from TA instability, minor (endovascular with <12 Fr sheath) and major (open or ≥12 Fr sheath) secondary interventions, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM). RESULTS A total of 246 patients (76% male; median age, 67 years [interquartile range, 61-73 years]) were treated for extent I (7%), extent II (55%), and extent III (35%) PD-TAAAs by FB-EVAR. The median aneurysm diameter was 65 mm (interquartile range, 59-73 mm). Eighteen patients (7%) were octogenarians, 212 (86%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3, and 21 (9%) presented with contained ruptured or symptomatic aneurysms. There were 917 renal-mesenteric vessels targeted by 581 fenestrations (63%) and 336 directional branches (37%), with a mean of 3.7 vessels per patient. Technical success was 96%. Mortality and rate of major adverse events at 30 days was 3% and 28%, including disabling complications such as new onset dialysis in 1%, major stroke in 1%, and permanent paraplegia in 2%. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated patient survival at 3 and 5 years was 79% ± 6% and 65% ± 10%. KM estimated freedom from ARM was 95% ± 3% and 93% ± 5% at the same intervals. Unplanned secondary interventions were needed in 94 patients (38%), including minor procedures in 64 (25%) and major procedures in 30 (12%). There was one conversion to open surgical repair (<1%). KM estimated freedom from any secondary intervention was 44% ± 9% at 5 years. KM estimated primary and secondary TA patency were 93% ± 2% and 96% ± 1% at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR for chronic PD-TAAAs was associated with high technical success and a low rate of mortality (3%) and disabling complications at 30 days. Although the procedure is effective in the prevention of ARM, patient survival was low at 5 years (65%), likely due to the significant comorbidities in this cohort of patients. Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 44%, although most procedures were minor. The significant rate of reinterventions highlights the need for continued patient surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Abdelhalim
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX
| | - Stephan Haulon
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, GHPSJ, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Gasper Warren
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Donald Adam
- Birmingham Vascular Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Claridge
- Birmingham Vascular Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Talha Butt
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Said Abisi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nuno V Dias
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Panos Gkoutzios
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marek Kuzniar
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Barend M Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Björn Sonesson
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paolo Spath
- Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Matthew Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bijan Modarai
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cirillo-Penn NC, Mendes BC, Tenorio ER, Cajas-Monson LC, D'Oria M, Oderich GS, DeMartino RR. Incidence and risk factors for interval aortic events during staged fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:874-882. [PMID: 37290733 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Staged endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms with first-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair may decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) associated with fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms or optimize the proximal landing zone in the cases requiring total aortic arch repair. However, a limitation of multistaged procedures is the risk of interval aortic events (IAEs) including mortality from a ruptured aneurysm. We aim to identify the incidence of and risk factors associated with IAEs during staged FB-EVAR. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective review of patients who underwent planned staged FB-EVAR from 2013 to 2021. Clinical and procedural details were reviewed. End points were the incidence of and risk factors associated with IAEs (defined as rupture, symptoms, and unexplained death) and outcomes in patients with or without IAEs. RESULTS Of 591 planned FB-EVAR patients, 142 underwent first-stage repairs. Twenty-two did not have a planned second stage because of frailty, preference, severe comorbidities, or complications after the first stage and were excluded. The remaining 120 patients (mean age: 73 ± 6 years, 51% female) were planned for second-stage completion FB-EVAR and comprised our cohort. The incidence of IAEs was 13% (16 of 120). This included confirmed rupture in 6 patients, possible rupture in 4, symptomatic presentation in 4, and early unexplained interval death with possible rupture in 2. The median time to IAEs was 17 days (range: 2-101 days), and the median time to uncomplicated completion repairs was 82 days (interquartile range: 30-147 days). Age, sex, and comorbidities were similar between the groups. There were no differences in familial aortic disease, genetically triggered aneurysms, aneurysm extent, or presence of chronic dissection. Patients with IAEs had significantly larger aneurysm diameters than those without IAEs (76.6 vs 66.5 mm, P ≤ .001). This difference persisted with indexing for body surface area (aortic size index: 3.9 vs 3.5 cm/m2, P = .04) and height (aortic height index: 4.5 vs 3.9 cm/m, P ≤ .001). IAE mortality was 69% (11 of 16) compared with no perioperative deaths for those with uncomplicated completion repairs. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of IAEs was 13% in patients planned for staged FB-EVAR. This represented a notable morbidity, including rupture, which must be balanced with SCI and landing zone optimization when planning repair. Larger aneurysms, especially when adjusted for body surface area, are associated with IAEs. Minimizing time between stages vs single-stage repairs for larger (>7 cm) complex aortic aneurysms in patients with reasonable SCI risk should be considered when planning repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Center for Aortic Disorders, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Randall R DeMartino
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Center for Aortic Disorders, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tenorio ER, Schanzer A, Timaran CH, Schneider DB, Mendes BC, Eagleton MJ, Farber MA, Parodi FE, Gasper WJ, Beck AW, Sweet MP, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Mid-term Renal and Mesenteric Artery Outcomes During Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the United States Aortic Research Consortium. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e893-e902. [PMID: 37051912 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report mid-term outcomes of renal-mesenteric target arteries (TAs) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. BACKGROUND TA instability (TAI) is the most frequent indication for reintervention after FB-EVAR. METHODS Data from consecutive patients enrolled in 9 prospective nonrandomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed. TA outcomes through 5 years of follow-up were analyzed for vessels incorporated by fenestrations or directional branches (DBs), including TA patency, endoleak, integrity failure, reintervention, and instability. RESULTS A total of 1681 patients had 6349 renal-mesenteric arteries were targeted using 3720 fenestrations (59%), 2435 DBs (38%), and 194 scallops (3%). Mean follow was 23 ± 21 months. At 5 years, TAs incorporated by fenestrations had higher primary (95 ± 1% vs 91 ± 1%, P < 0.001) and secondary patency (98 ± 1% vs 94 ± 1%, P < 0.001), and higher freedom from TAI (87 ± 2% vs 84 ± 2%, P = 0.002) compared with TAs incorporated by DBs, with no differences in other TA events. DBs targeted by balloon-expandable stent-grafts had significantly lower freedom from TAI (78 ± 4% vs 88 ± 1%, P = 0.006), TA endoleak (87 ± 3% vs 97 ± 1%, P < 0.001), and TA reintervention (83 ± 4% vs 95 ± 1%, P < 0.001) compared with those targeted by self-expandable stent-grafts. CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of renal and mesenteric TA during FB-EVAR is safe and durable with high 5-year patency rates and low freedom from TAI. DBs have lower patency rates and lower freedom from TAI than fenestrations, with better performance for self-expandable stent grafts as compared with balloon-expandable stent grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Matthew J Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Warren J Gasper
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS. Spinal cord protection: lessons learned from endovascular repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 12:484-486. [PMID: 37817855 PMCID: PMC10561342 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2023-scp-0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vacirca A, Wong J, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Tenorio ER, Huang Y, Mirza A, Saqib N, Sulzer T, Mesnard T, Mendes BC, Oderich GS. Outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in patients with or without prior history of abdominal endovascular or open surgical repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:278-288.e3. [PMID: 37080442 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in patients with or without prior history of abdominal open surgical (OSR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS The clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR for treatment of CAAAs and TAAAs was reviewed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed in patients with no previous aortic repair (Controls), prior EVAR (Group 1), and prior abdominal OSR (Group 2), including 30-day mortality and major adverse events (MAEs), patient survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), secondary interventions, any type II endoleak, sac enlargement (≥5 mm), and new-onset permanent dialysis. RESULTS There were 506 patients (69% male; mean age, 72 ± 9 years) treated by FB-EVAR, including 380 controls, 54 patients in Group 1 (EVAR), and 72 patients in Group 2 (abdominal OSR). FB-EVAR was performed on average 7 ± 4 and 12 ± 6 years after the index EVAR and abdominal OSR, respectively (P < .001). All three groups had similar clinical characteristics, except for less coronary artery disease in controls and more TAAAs and branch stent graft designs in Group 2 (P < .05). Aneurysm extent was CAAA in 144 patients (28%) and TAAA in 362 patients (72%). Overall technical success, mortality, and MAE rate were 96%, 1%, and 14%, respectively, with no difference between groups. Mean follow up was 30 ± 21 months. Patient survival was significantly lower in Group 2 (P = .03), but there was no difference in freedom from ARM and secondary interventions at 5 years between groups. Group 1 patients had lower freedom from any type II endoleak (P = .02) and sac enlargement (P < .001), whereas Group 2 patients had lower freedom from new-onset permanent dialysis (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR was performed with high technical success, low mortality, and similar risk of MAEs, regardless of prior history of abdominal aortic repair. Patient survival was significantly lower in patients who had previous abdominal OSR, but freedom from ARM and secondary interventions were similar among groups. Patients with prior EVAR had lower freedom from type II endoleak and sac enlargement. Patients with prior OSR had lower freedom from new-onset dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vacirca
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Joshua Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aleem Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Titia Sulzer
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Olsson KW, Mani K, Burdess A, Patterson S, Scali ST, Kölbel T, Panuccio G, Eleshra A, Bertoglio L, Ardita V, Melissano G, Acharya A, Bicknell C, Riga C, Gibbs R, Jenkins M, Bakthavatsalam A, Sweet MP, Kasprzak PM, Pfister K, Oikonomou K, Heloise T, Sobocinski J, Butt T, Dias N, Tang C, Cheng SWK, Vandenhaute S, Van Herzeele I, Sorber RA, Black JH, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Vincent Z, Khashram M, Eagleton MJ, Pedersen SF, Budtz-Lilly J, Lomazzi C, Bissacco D, Trimarchi S, Huerta A, Riambau V, Wanhainen A. Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Intervention in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:832-839. [PMID: 37314760 PMCID: PMC10267845 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Endovascular treatment is not recommended for aortic pathologies in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) other than in redo operations and as bridging procedures in emergencies. However, recent developments in endovascular technology may challenge this dogma. OBJECTIVE To assess the midterm outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in patients with CTD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For this descriptive retrospective study, data on demographics, interventions, and short-term and midterm outcomes were collected from 18 aortic centers in Europe, Asia, North America, and New Zealand. Patients with CTD who had undergone endovascular aortic repair from 2005 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to November 2022. EXPOSURE All principal endovascular aortic repairs, including redo surgery and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Short-term and midterm survival, rates of secondary procedures, and conversion to open repair. RESULTS In total, 171 patients were included: 142 with Marfan syndrome, 17 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 12 with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). Median (IQR) age was 49.9 years (37.9-59.0), and 107 patients (62.6%) were male. One hundred fifty-two (88.9%) were treated for aortic dissections and 19 (11.1%) for degenerative aneurysms. One hundred thirty-six patients (79.5%) had undergone open aortic surgery before the index endovascular repair. In 74 patients (43.3%), arch and/or visceral branches were included in the repair. Primary technical success was achieved in 168 patients (98.2%), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (5 patients). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 96.2% and 80.6% for Marfan syndrome, 93.8% and 85.2% for Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 75.0% and 43.8% for vEDS, respectively. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 years (1.9-9.2), 91 patients (53.2%) had undergone secondary procedures, of which 14 (8.2%) were open conversions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that endovascular aortic interventions, including redo procedures and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta, in patients with CTD had a high rate of early technical success, low perioperative mortality, and a midterm survival rate comparable with reports of open aortic surgery in patients with CTD. The rate of secondary procedures was high, but few patients required conversion to open repair. Improvements in devices and techniques, as well as ongoing follow-up, may result in endovascular treatment for patients with CTD being included in guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anne Burdess
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Suzannah Patterson
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Salvatore T. Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Eleshra
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ardita
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Germano Melissano
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Amish Acharya
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Bicknell
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Celia Riga
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Gibbs
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Jenkins
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arvind Bakthavatsalam
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Matthew P. Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Piotr M. Kasprzak
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karin Pfister
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kyriakos Oikonomou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, University Hospital Frankfurt and Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tessely Heloise
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jonathan Sobocinski
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Talha Butt
- Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ching Tang
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Stephen W. K. Cheng
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sarah Vandenhaute
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Van Herzeele
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rebecca A. Sorber
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James H. Black
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emanuel R. Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston
| | - Gustavo S. Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston
| | - Zoë Vincent
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Manar Khashram
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Matthew J. Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steen Fjord Pedersen
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sugery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sugery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Chiara Lomazzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Bissacco
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Abigail Huerta
- Vascular Surgery Department, CardioVascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vincent Riambau
- Vascular Surgery Department, CardioVascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tenorio ER, Mirza AK, Lima GBB, Marcondes GB, Wong J, Mendes BC, Saqib N, Khan S, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Characterization of Secondary Interventions After Fenestrated-branched Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms and Its Effect on Quality of Life and Patient Survival. Ann Surg 2023; 278:140-147. [PMID: 35801701 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of secondary intervention (SI) on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. BACKGROUND The effect of SI after FB-EVAR on physical and mental HR-QOL has not been described. METHODS A cohort of 430 consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR (2013-2020) was assessed with 1325 short-form 36 HR-QOL questionnaires preoperatively and during follow-up visits. SIs were classified as major or minor procedures. Endpoints included patient survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), freedom from SIs, and changes in HR-QOL physical component score (PCS) and mental component score. RESULTS There were 302 male with mean age 74±8 years treated by FB-EVAR for 133 complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and 297 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. After a mean follow up of 26±20 months, 97 patients (23%) required 137 SIs. At 5 years, freedom from any SI was 64%±4%, including freedom from minor SIs of 77%±4% and major SIs of 87%±3%. There was no difference in patient survival and freedom from ARM at same interval. On adjusted analysis, minor SIs correlated with improved survival. SIs had a negative correlation with PCS ( r =-0.8). There were no significant changes in mental component score with SIs. Predictors for SIs were fluoroscopy time, graft design, and aneurysm sac change. CONCLUSION SIs were needed in nearly 1 out of 4 patients treated by FB-EVAR with no effect on patient survival or ARM. SI resulted in decline in PCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Guilherme B B Lima
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Giulianna B Marcondes
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Joshua Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Sophia Khan
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tenorio ER, Schanzer A, Timaran CH, Schneider DB, Mendes BC, Eagleton MJ, Farber MA, Parodi FE, Gasper WJ, Beck AW, Sweet MP, Zettervall SL, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Effect of bridging stent graft selection for directional branches on target artery outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in the United States Aortic Research Consortium. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:10-28.e3. [PMID: 36948277 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of directional branches (DBs) bridging stent choice on target artery (TA) outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS Patients enrolled in nine prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies in the United States between 2005 and 2020 were analyzed. All patients who had at least one TA incorporated by DB using either self-expandable (SESGs), balloon-expandable (BESGs), or hybrid stent graft combinations (HSGs). Endpoints were TA patency and freedom from TA endoleak, instability, and reintervention. RESULTS There were 800 patients with 2426 renal-mesenteric arteries incorporated by DBs. DB stent selection was SESGs in 1205 TAs (50%), BESGs in 1095 TAs (45%), and HSGs in 126 TAs (5%). SESGs were predominantly used in the first three quartiles of the study period, whereas BESGs comprised 75% of all stents between 2017 and 2020. The median follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range, 6-35 months). At 5 years, BESGs had significantly lower freedom from TA instability (78% ± 4% vs 88% ± 1% vs 96% ± 2%; log-rank P =.010), freedom from TA endoleaks (87% ± 3% vs 97% ± 1% vs 99% ± 1%; log-rank P < .001), and freedom from TA reintervention (83% ± 4% vs 95% ± 1% vs 99% ± 2%; log-rank P <.001) compared with SESGs or HSGs, respectively. For renal arteries, there was no difference in freedom from TA instability for BESGs, SESGs, or HSGs. However, freedom from TA endoleaks and reintervention were lower for renal arteries targeted by BESGs compared with DBs targeted by SESGs and HSGs (83% ± 6% vs 98% ± 1% vs 100%; log-rank P < .001; and 70% ± 10% vs 92% ± 1% vs 96% ± 4%; log-rank P = .022). For mesenteric arteries, DBs targeted by BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, endoleak, and reintervention than SESGs or HSGs. In stent-specific analysis, iCAST BESGs had the lowest freedom from TA instability either for renal or mesenteric arteries, primarily due to higher rates of TA endoleaks. There was no difference in patency in any scenario. Independent predictors of TA instability were age (+1-year: hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99), stent diameter (+1 mm: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80), and BESG (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9). CONCLUSIONS DBs incorporated using BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, TA endoleak, and TA reintervention compared with SESGs and HSGs. The patency of DBs was not affected by the type of stent construction. The observed performance disadvantage associated with BESGs appears to have largely been driven by iCAST usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Matthew J Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - F Ezequiel Parodi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Warren J Gasper
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chait J, Tenorio ER, Kawajiri H, Lima GBB, Cirillo-Penn NC, Bagameri G, Pochettino A, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Mid-Term Outcomes of "Complete Aortic Repair": Surgical or Endovascular Total Arch Replacement With Thoracoabdominal Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231181211. [PMID: 37313951 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231181211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe a single-center experience of "complete aortic repair" consisting of surgical or endovascular total arch replacement/repair (TAR) followed by thoracoabdominal fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR). METHODS We reviewed 480 consecutive patients who underwent FB-EVAR with physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) or manufactured stent-grafts between 2013 and 2022. From those, we selected only patients treated with open or endovascular arch repair and distal FB-EVAR for aneurysms involving the ascending, arch and thoracoabdominal aortic segments (zones 0-9). Manufactured devices were used under an investigational device exemption protocol. Endpoints included early/in-hospital mortality, mid-term survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and target artery instability. RESULTS There were 22 patients, 14 men and 8 women with a median age of 72±7 years. Thirteen postdissection and 9 degenerative aortic aneurysms were repaired with a mean maximum diameter of 67±11 mm. Time from index aortic procedure to aneurysm exclusion was 169 and 270 days in those undergoing 2- and 3-stage repair strategies, respectively. The ascending aorta and aortic arch were treated with 19 surgical and 3 endovascular TAR procedures. Three (16%) surgical arch procedures were performed elsewhere, and perioperative details were unavailable. Mean bypass, cross-clamp, and circulatory arrest times were 295±57, 216±63, and 46±11 minutes, respectively. There were 4 major adverse events (MAEs) in 2 patients: both required postoperative hemodialysis, 1 had postbypass cardiogenic shock necessitating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and the other required evacuation of an acute-on-chronic subdural hematoma. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair was performed with 17 manufactured endografts and 5 PMEGs. There was no early mortality. Six (27%) patients experienced MAEs. There were 4 (18%) cases of spinal cord injury with 3 (75%) experiencing complete symptom resolution before discharge. Mean follow-up was 30±17 months in which there were 5 patient deaths-0 aortic related. Eight patients required ≥1 secondary intervention, and 6 target arteries demonstrated instability (3 IC, 1 IIIC endoleaks; 2 TA stenoses). Kaplan-Meier 3-year estimates of patient survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and target artery instability were 78±8%, 56±11%, and 68±11%, respectively. CONCLUSION Complete aortic repair with staged surgical or endovascular TAR and distal FB-EVAR is safe and effective with satisfactory morbidity, mid-term survival, and target artery outcomes. CLINICAL IMPACT The presented study demonstrates that repair of the entirety of the aorta - via total endovascular or hybrid means- is safe and effective with low rates of spinal cord ischemia. Cardiovascular specialists within comprehensive aortic teams at should feel confident that staged repair of the most complex degenerative and post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms can be safely performed in their patients with complication profile similar to that of less extensive repairs. Meticulous and intentional case planning is imperative for immediate and long-term success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Chait
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hidetake Kawajiri
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Guilherme B B Lima
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Gabor Bagameri
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Randall R DeMartino
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sulzer T, Tenorio ER, Mesnard T, Vacirca A, Baghbani-Oskouei A, de Bruin JL, Verhagen HJM, Oderich GS. Intraoperative complications during standard and complex endovascular aortic repair. Semin Vasc Surg 2023; 36:189-201. [PMID: 37330233 DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the most common intraoperative adverse events that occur during standard endovascular repair and fenestrated-branched endovascular repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, and aortic arch aneurysms. Despite advancements in endovascular techniques, sophisticated imaging and improved graft designs, intraoperative difficulties still occur, even in highly standardized procedures and high-volume centers. This study emphasized that with the increased adoption and complexity of endovascular aortic procedures, strategies to minimize intraoperative adverse events should be protocolized and standardized. There is a need for robust evidence on this topic, which could potentially optimize treatment outcomes and durability of the available techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titia Sulzer
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
| | | | - Jorg L de Bruin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Schanzer A, Beck AW, Gargiulo M, Farber MA, Modarai B, Jakimowicz T, Bertoglio L, Chiesa R, Gallitto E, Marcondes GB, Parodi FE, Motta F, Gkoutzios P, Jama K. Endovascular repair of intercostal and visceral aortic patch aneurysms following open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:1261-1271.e5. [PMID: 34030882 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reoperative open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) for the treatment of intercostal or visceral aortic patch aneurysms after OSR of TAAAs. METHODS We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of consecutive patients treated at 8 academic centers by F-BEVAR for visceral and intercostal aortic patch aneurysms after OSR of TAAAs (2011-2019). All patients had involvement of at least one target vessel requiring incorporation by a fenestration or directional branch. End points were technical success, 30-day and/in-hospital mortality, major adverse events, patient survival, target vessel patency/instability, and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS There were 29 patients with a median age of 70 (interquartile range, 63-74) years. Seven patients (24%) had connective tissue disorders. Technical success was 100%. There were no 30-day/in-hospital mortalities. Major adverse events occurred in 5 patients (17%), including estimated blood loss >1 L in 3 patients (10%), acute kidney injury and respiratory failure in 2 patients (7%) each, and transient paraparesis in 1 patient (3%). Median follow-up was 14 (interquartile range, 7-37) months. At 2 years, primary and secondary patency, freedom from target artery instability, freedom from reintervention, and patient survival were 95%, 100%, 83%, 61%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS F-BEVAR could be considered as an alternative to reoperative OSR in patients with visceral or intercostal aortic patch aneurysms. This series showed no mortality and a low rate of major adverse events, but a significant need for reintervention.
Collapse
|
19
|
Vacirca A, Dias-Neto M, Marcondes G, Tenorio ER, Barbosa Lima GB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mendes BC, Saqib N, Mirza AK, Oderich GS. Indications and Outcomes of Iliofemoral Conduits During Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
|
20
|
Baghbani-Oskouei A, Tenorio ER, Dias-Neto M, Vacirca A, Mirza AK, Saqib N, Mendes BC, Ocasio L, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Technical Pitfalls for Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair Following PETTICOAT. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231163439. [PMID: 36995081 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231163439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Provisional Extension to Induce Complete Attachment Technique (PETTICOAT) uses a bare-metal stent to scaffold the true lumen in patients with acute or subacute aortic dissections. While it is designed to facilitate remodeling, some patients with chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) require repair. This study describes the technical pitfalls of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) in patients who underwent prior PETTICOAT repair. TECHNIQUE We report 3 patients with extent II TAAAs who had prior bare-metal dissection stents treated by FB-EVAR. Two patients required maneuvers to reroute the aortic guidewire, which was initially placed in-between stent struts. This was recognized before the deployment of the fenestrated-branched device. A third patient had difficult advancement of the celiac bridging stent due to a conflict of the tip of the stent delivery system into one of the stent struts, requiring to redo catheterization and pre-stenting with a balloon-expandable stent. There were no mortalities and target-related events after a follow-up of 12 to 27 months. CONCLUSION FB-EVAR following the PETTICOAT is infrequent, but technical difficulties should be recognized to prevent complications from the inadvertent deployment of the fenestrated-branched stent-graft component in-between stent struts. CLINICAL IMPACT The present study highlights a few maneuvers to prevent or overcome possible complications during endovascular repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm following PETTICOAT. The main problem to be recognized is the placement of the aortic wire beyond one of the struts of the existing bare-metal stent. Moreover, encroachment of catheters or the bridging stent delivery system into the stent struts may potentially cause difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura Ocasio
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eleshra A, Oderich GS, McWilliams RG, Panuccio G, Katsargyris A, Tsilimparis N, Tenorio ER, Fisher RK, Verhoeven E, Kölbel T. Endovascular Preservation of Segmental Arteries During Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Fenestrated/Branched Stent-Grafts: Feasibility and outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023:S1051-0443(23)00201-4. [PMID: 36889436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate technical success, feasibility, and outcomes of endovascular preservation of segmental arteries (SAs) during fenestrated /branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR). METHODS A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients treated with F/B-EVAR and a branch or fenestration for SA preservation. Eleven patients (median age 57, range 45-73; 7 men) were included. RESULTS Twelve SAs were preserved. Stent-grafts were custom-made with fenestrations, branches, or a combination of both in 1, 2, and 5 patients. A t-branch was used in 2 patients and physician-modified thoracic stent-graft with a branch was used in 1 patient. Eight branches and 4 fenestrations were used for the preservation of 12 SAs. Four fenestrations and 1 branch for SAs were not bridged and were left for the perfusion of the corresponding SAs. Technical success was achieved in 10/11 (91%) patients. No early mortality occurred. Early morbidities included renal insufficiency without dialysis in 1 patient and partially delayed paraplegia in 1 patient. Pre-discharge computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed patency of all SAs. No early aortic-related re-interventions were required. The median follow-up was 30 (range 10-88) months. Late death occurred in 1 patient. Two SAs occluded in 1 patient with two un-stented fenestrations at 1-year follow-up CTA. This patient did not develop spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Other SAs remained patent during follow-up. One patient with type IIIc endoleak was treated by relining of bridging stents. CONCLUSION Endovascular preservation of SAs with F/B-EVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is feasible and safe in selected patients and may add to preventive measures for SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Athanasios Katsargyris
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Robert K Fisher
- Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Verhoeven
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vacirca A, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Tenorio ER, Huang Y, Mirza A, Saqib N, Mendes B, Oderich GS. Early and Midterm Outcomes of Fenestrated-branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients with or without Prior History of Abdominal Endovascular or Open Surgical Repair. J Vasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
|
23
|
Chamseddin K, Timaran CH, Oderich GS, Tenorio ER, Farber MA, Parodi FE, Schneider DB, Schanzer A, Beck AW, Sweet MP, Zettervall SL, Mendes B, Eagleton MJ, Gasper WJ. Comparison of upper extremity and transfemoral access for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:704-711. [PMID: 36257344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of upper extremity (UE) access is an accepted and often implemented approach for fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR). The advent of steerable sheaths has enabled the performance of F-BEVAR using a total transfemoral (TF) approach without UE access, potentially decreasing the risks of cerebral embolic events. The purpose of the present study was to assess the outcomes of F-BEVAR using UE vs TF access. METHODS Prospectively collected data from nine physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies at U.S. centers were analyzed using a standardized database. All patients were treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using industry-manufactured fenestrated and branched stent grafts between 2005 and 2020. The outcomes were compared between patients who had undergone UE vs total TF access. The primary composite outcome was stroke or transient ischemia attack (TIA) and 30-day or in-patient mortality during the perioperative period. The secondary outcomes included technical success, local access-related complications, and perioperative mortality. RESULTS Among 1681 patients (71% men; mean age, 73.43 ± 7.8 years) who had undergone F-BEVAR, 502 had had CAAAs (30%), 535 had had extent IV TAAAs (32%), and 644 had had extent I to III TAAAs (38%). UE access was used for 1103 patients (67%). The right side was used for 395 patients (24%) and the left side for 705 patients (42%). UE access was preferentially used for TAAAs (74% vs 47%; P < .001). In contrast, TF access was used more frequently for CAAAs (53% vs 26%; P < .01). A total of 38 perioperative cerebrovascular events (2.5%), including 32 strokes (1.9%) and 6 TIAs (0.4%), had occurred. Perioperative cerebrovascular events had occurred more frequently with UE access than with TF access (2.8% vs 1.2%; P = .036). An individual component analysis of the primary composite outcome revealed a trend for more frequent strokes (2.3% vs 1.2%; P = .13) and TIAs (0.54% vs 0%; P = .10) in the UE access group. On multivariable analysis, total TF access was associated with a 60% reduction in the frequency of perioperative cerebrovascular events (odds ratio, 0.39; P = .029). No significant differences were observed between UE and TF access in the technical success rate (96.5% vs 96.8%; P = .72), perioperative mortality (2.9% vs 2.6%; P = .72), or local access-related complications (6.5% vs 5.5%; P = .43). CONCLUSIONS In the present large, multicenter, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, a total TF approach for F-BEVAR was associated with a lower rate of perioperative cerebrovascular events compared with UE access. Although the cerebrovascular event rate was low with UE access, the TF approach offered a lower risk of stroke and TIA. UE access will continue to play a role for appropriately selected patients requiring more complex repairs with anatomy not amenable to the TF approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Chamseddin
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - F Ezequiel Parodi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sara L Zettervall
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthew J Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Warren J Gasper
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rogers RT, Lemmens CC, Tenorio ER, Schurink GWH, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mees BME, Mendes BC. Fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair using unilateral femoral access in patients with iliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:722-730. [PMID: 36372375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) in patients with occluded iliac arteries is challenging owing to limited access for branch vessel catheterization and increased risk for leg and spinal ischemic complications. The aim of this study was to analyze technical strategies and outcomes of F/BEVAR in patients with unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients treated by F/BEVAR in two institutions (2003-2021). Patients with unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease were included in the analysis. All patients had one patent iliac artery that was used for advancement of the fenestrated-branch component. Preloaded catheter/guidewire systems or steerable sheaths were used as adjuncts to facilitate catheterization. Primary endpoints were technical success, mortality, major adverse events (stroke, spinal cord injury, dialysis or decrease in the glomerular filtration rate of more than 50%, bowel ischemia, myocardial infarction, or respiratory failure), primary iliac patency, and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS There were 959 patients treated with F/BEVAR. Of these, 15 patients (1.56%; mean age, 74 years; 80% male) had occluded iliac arteries and 1 patent iliofemoral access and were treated for a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 8) or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 7). Brachial access was used in 14 of the 15 patients and preloaded systems in 7 of the 15 patients (47%). The remaining 53% had staggered deployment of stent grafts. There were seven physician-modified endovascular grafts, seven custom-made devices, and one off-the-shelf device used. Thirteen patients (87%) had distal seal using aortouni-iliac stent grafts and two (13%) had distal seal in the infrarenal aorta. Concomitant femoral crossover bypass (FCB) was performed in two patients and six patients had a prior FCB. Technical success was 100%. There were no intraoperative complications or early lower extremity ischemic complications, and all FCB were preserved. There was one mortality (7%) within 30 days owing to retrograde type A dissection. Major adverse events occurred in 20% of patients. The median follow-up was 12 months (range, 0-85 months). Two patients (13%) required three reinterventions. One patient required proximal stent graft extension for an acute type B dissection (3 months) and another required iliac extension for type Ib endoleak of an aortouni-iliac graft (21 months) and thrombolysis of that extension (50 months). At last follow-up, all patients had primary graft patency except one with secondary graft patency without new claudication. One patient had a single renal artery stent occlusion at follow-up with no r-intervention. The overall survival rate was 60%, without aortic-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS Although challenging, F/BEVAR with unilateral femoral/brachial approach is feasible in patients with occluded iliac limbs, with an important rate of ischemic complications, but satisfactory outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Rogers
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Charlotte C Lemmens
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Geert Willem H Schurink
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wong J, Tenorio ER, Lima G, Dias-Neto M, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mendes B, Kratzberg J, Ocasio L, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Early Feasibility of Endovascular Repair of Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysms Using Patient-Specific Single Retrograde Left Subclavian Artery Branch Stent Graft. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:249-254. [PMID: 36319711 PMCID: PMC9628377 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03304-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the feasibility and outcomes of endovascular repair of distal aortic arch aneurysms using a patient-specific stent graft with a pre-loaded single retrograde left subclavian artery (LSA) branch stent graft. METHODS We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of consecutive patients enrolled in an ongoing prospective, non-randomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using patient-specific arch branch stent grafts (William Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 2019 and 2022. All patients received a design with triple-wide scallop and a single retrograde LSA branch with a pre-loaded catheter. RESULTS There were five male patients with median age of 77 years old (72-80) treated using the single LSA branch stent graft. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Median operating time, fluoroscopy time, and total radiation dose area product were 103 (78-134) minutes, 26 (19-39) minutes, and 123 (71-270) mGy.cm2, respectively. There were no 30-day or in-hospital mortality, neurological or other major adverse events (MAEs). During median follow-up of 21 (20-27) months, all patients were alive with patent LSA branches, except for one who died of COVID-19 complications. There was no branch instability or secondary interventions. CONCLUSION This early feasibility study demonstrates successful endovascular repair of distal aortic arch aneurysms using a patient-specific stent graft with single retrograde LSA branch without technical failures, mortality or neurological events. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed to determined effectiveness of this approach in patients who need endovascular repair with proximal extension into Zone 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Wong
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilherme Lima
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jarin Kratzberg
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Laura Ocasio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
- Texas Medical Center, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6400 Fannin, Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tenorio ER, Vacirca A, Mesnard T, Sulzer T, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mirza AK, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Technical tips and clinical experience with the Cook Triple inner arch branch stent-graft. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2023; 64:9-17. [PMID: 36598743 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12569-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for treatment for aortic arch diseases, but these operations can be associated with wide heterogeneity in outcomes and significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients with severe comorbidities or those who had prior arch procedures via median sternotomy. Endovascular repair has been introduced as a less invasive alternative to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair. The technique evolved with new device designs using up to three inner branches for incorporation of the supra-aortic trunks. This manuscript summarizes technical tips and clinical experience with the triple inner arch branch stent graft for total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Vacirca
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Titia Sulzer
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cirillo-Penn NC, Tenorio ER, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Outcomes Of Patients Treated For Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Fenestrated Grafts With A Double-Wide Scallop For Celiac Artery Incorporation. Ann Vasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.12.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
28
|
Chait J, Tenorio ER, Hofer JM, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Five-year outcomes of physician-modified endografts for repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:374-385.e4. [PMID: 36356675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is paucity of data on the durability of physician modified endografts (PMEGs) for complex abdominal (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) despite widespread use. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the early and long-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for CAAAs and TAAAs using PMEGs. METHODS We reviewed clinical data and outcomes of patients treated by FB-EVAR using PMEGs for CAAAs (defined as short-neck infrarenal, juxtarenal, and pararenal AAAs) and TAAAs between 2007 and 2019. All patients were treated by a dedicated team with extensive manufactured device experience. Endpoints included 30-day mortality and major adverse events, patient survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), freedom from secondary intervention, target artery (TA) patency, and freedom from TA endoleak and TA instability. RESULTS Of 645 patients undergoing FB-EVAR, 156 patients (24%) treated with PMEG (121 males; mean age, 75 ± 8 years) were included. There were 89 CAAAs, 33 extent IV TAAAs and 34 extent I to III TAAAs. A total of 452 renal-mesenteric targets (3.1 ± 1.0 vessels/patient) were incorporated. Patients with TAAAs had significantly (P < .05) larger aneurysms (73 ± 11 vs 68 ± 14 mm), more TAs incorporated (3.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.8 ± 1.0), and more often had previous aortic repair (54% vs 27%). Technical success was higher in patients treated for CAAAs (99% vs 91%; P = .04). Thirty-day and/or in-hospital mortality was 5.7% and was significantly lower for CAAAs compared with TAAAs (2% vs 10%; P = .04), with three of nine early mortalities (33%) among patients treated emergently. After a mean follow-up of 49 ± 38 months, there were 12 aortic-related deaths (7.6%), including nine early deaths (5.7%) from perioperative complications and three late deaths (1.9%) from rupture. At 5 years, patient survival was 41%. Patients treated for CAAAs had higher 5-year freedom from ARM (P = .016), TA instability (P = .05), TA endoleak (P = .01), and TA secondary interventions (P = .05) with a higher, but non-significant, freedom from sac enlargement ≥5 mm (P = .11). Primary and secondary TA patency was 91% ± 2% and 99% ± 1%, respectively. Sac regression ≥5 mm occurred in 67 patients (43%) and was associated with increased survival (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.80) compared with those without sac regression. CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR using PMEGs was performed with acceptable long-term outcomes. Overall patient survival was low due to significant underlying comorbidities. Patients treated for CAAAs had higher freedom from ARM, TA instability, TA endoleak, TA secondary interventions, and a trend towards higher freedom from sac enlargement compared with patients treated for TAAAs. Sac regression was associated with improved patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Chait
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Janet M Hofer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chait J, Tenorio ER, Hofer JM, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Five-year outcomes of physician-modified endografts for repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
|
30
|
Vacirca A, Tenorio ER, Mesnard T, Sulzer T, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mirza AK, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Technical tips and clinical experience with the Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis®. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2023; 64:18-25. [PMID: 36534126 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12564-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been widely accepted as a treatment option in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections who have suitable anatomy. It is estimated that up to 60% of patients treated by TEVAR require extension of the repair into the distal aortic arch across Ishimaru zone 2. In these patients, coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) without revascularization has been associated with increased risk of arm ischemia, stroke, and spinal cord injury. The Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) is the first off-the-shelf thoracic branch stent-graft approved by the Federal Drug Administration for treatment of distal aortic arch lesions requiring extension of the proximal seal into zone 2. This article summarizes the technical pitfalls and clinical outcomes of the TBE® device in zone 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vacirca
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Titia Sulzer
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ying Huang
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Memorial Hermann Medical Plaza, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dias-Neto M, Tenorio ER, Huang Y, Jakimowicz T, Mendes BC, Kölbel T, Sobocinski J, Bertoglio L, Mees B, Gargiulo M, Dias N, Schanzer A, Gasper W, Beck AW, Farber MA, Mani K, Timaran C, Schneider DB, Pedro LM, Tsilimparis N, Haulon S, Sweet M, Ferreira E, Eagleton M, Yeung KK, Khashram M, Varcica A, Lima GB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Jama K, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Chiesa R, Schurink GW, Lemmens C, Gallitto E, Faggioli G, Karelis A, Parodi E, Gomes V, Wanhainen A, Dean A, Colon JP, Pavarino F, E Melo RG, Crawford S, Garcia R, Ribeiro T, Kappe KO, van Knippenberg SEM, Tran BL, Gormley S, Oderich GS. Comparison of single- and multistage strategies during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1588-1597.e4. [PMID: 36731757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of single or multistage approach during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for extent I to III TAAAs in 24 centers (2006-2021). All patients received a single brand manufactured patient-specific or off-the-shelf fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Staging strategies included proximal thoracic aortic repair, minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization, temporary aneurysm sac perfusion and combinations of these techniques. Endpoints were analyzed for elective repair in patients who had a single- or multistage approach before and after propensity score adjustment for baseline differences, including the composite 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia, major adverse event, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality. RESULTS A total of 1947 patients (65% male; mean age, 71 ± 8 years) underwent FB-EVAR of 155 extent I (10%), 729 extent II (46%), and 713 extent III TAAAs (44%). A single-stage approach was used in 939 patients (48%) and a multistage approach in 1008 patients (52%). A multistage approach was more frequently used in patients undergoing elective compared with non-elective repair (55% vs 35%; P < .001). Staging strategies were proximal thoracic aortic repair in 743 patients (74%), temporary aneurysm sac perfusion in 128 (13%), minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization in 10 (1%), and combinations in 127 (12%). Among patients undergoing elective repair (n = 1597), the composite endpoint of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia rate occurred in 14% of single-stage and 6% of multistage approach patients (P < .001). After adjustment with a propensity score, multistage approach was associated with lower rates of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia (odds ratio, 0.466; 95% confidence interval, 0.271-0.801; P = .006) and higher patient survival at 1 year (86.9±1.3% vs 79.6±1.7%) and 3 years (72.7±2.1% vs 64.2±2.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.714; 95% confidence interval, 0.528-0.966; P = .029), compared with a single stage approach. CONCLUSION Staging elective FB-EVAR of extent I to III TAAAs was associated with decreased risk of mortality and/or permanent paraplegia at 30 days or within hospital stay, and with higher patient survival at 1 and 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dias-Neto
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Ying Huang
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- University Medical Center Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Sobocinski
- Vascular Surgery, Aortic Centre, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, France; Université de Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Barend Mees
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Warren Gasper
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA
| | - Adam W Beck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carlos Timaran
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luis Mendes Pedro
- Department of Vascular Surgery of the Hospital Santa Maria (CHULN) and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Matt Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Emília Ferreira
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Matthew Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kak Khee Yeung
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VU medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manar Khashram
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrea Varcica
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Guilherme B Lima
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Fiona Rohlffs
- University Medical Center Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Geert Willem Schurink
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Lemmens
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelos Karelis
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ezequiel Parodi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Vivian Gomes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anastasia Dean
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jesus Porras Colon
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Felipe Pavarino
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Department of Vascular Surgery of the Hospital Santa Maria (CHULN) and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Sean Crawford
- Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Rita Garcia
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tiago Ribeiro
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Kaj Olav Kappe
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VU medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bich Lan Tran
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VU medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sinead Gormley
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tenorio ER, Macedo TA, Ocasio L, Neto MD, Barbosa Lima GB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Estrera AL, Dhoble A, Zhou SF, Oderich GS. Total Transfemoral Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using 3-Vessel Inner Branch Stent-Graft. JACC Case Rep 2022; 4:101680. [PMID: 36438890 PMCID: PMC9685361 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Endovascular repair has been introduced to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair of aortic arch pathology. We illustrate total percutaneous transfemoral approach with a 3-vessel inner branch stent-graft to treat aortic arch aneurysm. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R. Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thanila A. Macedo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Laura Ocasio
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marina Dias Neto
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Guilherme B. Barbosa Lima
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony L. Estrera
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Abhijeet Dhoble
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease and Interventional Cardiology, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shao Feng Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gustavo S. Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dias-Neto M, Tenorio ER, Lima GBB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Saqib N, Mendes BC, Mirza AK, Oderich GS. Outcomes of low- and standard-profile fenestrated and branched stent grafts for treatment of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1160-1169.e1. [PMID: 35810953 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We compared the outcomes of fenestrated-branched (FB) endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using low-profile (LP) and standard-profile (SP) stent grafts for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS We reviewed the clinical data of 466 consecutive patients (70% male; mean age, 74 ± 8 years) enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study to investigate FB-EVAR for the treatment of CAAAs and TAAAs (2013-2021). The endpoints compared between the patients treated with LP (18F-20F) and SP (20F-22F) devices included procedural metrics, access-related complications, major adverse events (MAE), patient survival, freedom from secondary intervention, thromboembolic events, stent graft integrity issues, aneurysm sac enlargement, and the rate of sac shrinkage. RESULTS Of the 466 aneurysms treated by FB-EVAR, 138 were CAAAs and 141 were extent IV and 187 extent I to III TAAAs, with a mean number of 3.9 ± 0.5 vessels stented per patient. LP devices had been used in 239 patients (51%) and SP devices in 227 patients (49%). LP devices had been used more frequently for chronic dissections (12% vs 7%; P = .041) and with preloaded systems (77% vs 65%; P = .005) and bilateral percutaneous femoral access (83% vs 74%; P = .020) and less frequently with upper extremity access (67% vs 88%; P < .001) and iliac conduits (2% vs 6%; P = .020). The patients treated using LP devices had experienced similar technical success (96% vs 97%; P = .527), with a shorter total operating time (225 ± 81 minutes vs 243 ± 78 minutes; P = .018), lower radiation exposure (median, 0.93 Gy; interquartile range [IQR], 0.94; vs median, 1.01 Gy; IQR, 0.91 Gy; P < .001), and less use of contrast (median, 135 mL; IQR, 68 mL; vs median, 144 mL; IQR, 80 mL; P = .008). No differences were found in the rates of iliofemoral access complications between the LP and SP device groups (1.3% vs 3.5%; P = .107). At 30 days, 5 patients had died (1%) and MAEs had occurred in 89 patients (19%), with no differences between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 28 months (95% confidence interval, 25-30 months). At 4 years, the patients treated with LP devices had had similar freedom from all-cause mortality (69% ± 6% vs 68% ± 4%; P = .199), freedom from aortic-related mortality (97% ± 1% vs 98% ± 1%; P = .488), freedom from any secondary intervention (65% ± 6% vs 70% ± 4%; P = .433), freedom from thromboembolic events (98% ± 1% vs 99% ± 1%; P = .364) and aneurysm sac enlargement (93% ± 3% vs 91% ± 3%; P = .293). However, the LP group had had less freedom from any integrity-related issues (92% ± 5% vs 100%; P < .001). The cumulative risk of sac shrinkage was greater for patients treated with LP devices (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.040; 95% confidence interval, 1.516-2.744; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR was performed with low rates of mortality and MAEs, irrespective of the device profile. However, the procedures performed with LP devices had had less need for iliac conduits and had had better procedural metrics. The use of LP devices resulted in higher rates of sac shrinkage. However, the results on stent graft integrity require future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dias-Neto
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Guilherme B Barbosa Lima
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Escobar GA, Oderich GS, Farber MA, de Souza LR, Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Patel HJ, Eliason JL, Upchurch GR, H Timaran C, Black JH, Ellozy SH, Woo EY, Fillinger MF, Singh MJ, Lee JT, C Jimenez J, Lall P, Gloviczki P, Kalra M, Duncan AA, Lyden SP, Tenorio ER. Results of the North American Complex Abdominal Aortic Debranching (NACAAD) Registry. Circulation 2022; 146:1149-1158. [PMID: 36148651 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.045894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid debranching repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms was initially designed as a better alternative to standard open repair, addressing the limitations of endovascular repair involving the visceral aorta. We reviewed the collective outcomes of hybrid debranching repairs using extra-anatomic, open surgical debranching of the renal-mesenteric arteries, followed by endovascular aortic stenting. METHODS Data from patients who underwent hybrid repair in 14 North American institutions during 10 years were retrospectively reviewed. Society of Vascular Surgery scores were used to assess comorbidity risk. Early and late outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, reintervention, and patency were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 208 patients (118 male; mean age, 71±8 years old) were treated by hybrid repair with extraanatomic reconstruction of 657 renal and mesenteric arteries (mean 3.2 vessels/patient). Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.6±1.3 cm. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were identified in 163 (78%) patients and pararenal aneurysms in 45 (22%). A single-stage repair was performed in 92 (44%) patients. The iliac arteries were the most common source of inflow (n=132; 63%), and most (n=150; 72%) had 3 or more bypasses. There were 30 (14%) early deaths, ranging widely across sites (0%-21%). A Society of Vascular Surgery comorbidity score >15 was the primary predictor of early mortality (P<0.01), whereas mortality was 3% in a score ≤9. Early complications occurred in 140 (73%) patients and included respiratory complications in 45 patients (22%) and spinal cord ischemia in 22 (11%), of whom 10 (45%) fully recovered. At 5 years, survival was 61±5%, primary graft patency was 90±2%, and secondary patency was 93±2%. The most significant predictor of late mortality was renal insufficiency (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Mortality after hybrid repair and visceral debranching is highly variable by center, but strongly affected by preoperative comorbidities and the centers' experience with the technique. With excellent graft patency at 5 years, the outcomes of hybrid repair done at centers of excellence and in carefully selected patients may be comparable (or better) than traditional open or even totally endovascular approaches. However, in patients already considered as high-risk for surgery, it may not offer better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX (G.S.O., E.R.T.)
| | - Mark A Farber
- University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, NC (M.A.F.)
| | - Leonardo R de Souza
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil (L.R.d.S.)
| | | | - Himanshu J Patel
- University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, MI (H.J.P., J.L.E.)
| | - Jonathan L Eliason
- University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, MI (H.J.P., J.L.E.)
| | | | | | - James H Black
- Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD (J.H.B)
| | - Sharif H Ellozy
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (S.H.E.)
| | | | | | - Michael J Singh
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (M.J.S.)
| | - Jason T Lee
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA (J.T.L.)
| | - Juan C Jimenez
- University of California, Los Angeles, CA (W.J.Q.-B., J.C.J.)
| | - Purandath Lall
- Cleveland Clinic Martin Health, Port St. Lucie, FL (P.L., M.K.)
| | | | - Manju Kalra
- Cleveland Clinic Martin Health, Port St. Lucie, FL (P.L., M.K.).,Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.G., M.K.)
| | - Audra A Duncan
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario; Canada (A.A.D.)
| | - Sean P Lyden
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (S.P.L.)
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX (G.S.O., E.R.T.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dias-Neto M, Tenorio ER, Baumgardt Barbosa Lima G, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Oderich GS. Postoperative management in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2022; 63:587-596. [PMID: 35687066 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12359-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Patients with complex aortic aneurysms (CAA) are often high risk due to advanced age and widespread atherosclerosis affecting numerous vascular territories. Therefore, a thorough perioperative evaluation is needed prior to performing in any type of aortic repair, regardless of whether an endovascular or open surgical approach is selected. Because these operations are technically demanding and often result in end organ ischemia, it is not surprising that complex aortic repair carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Disabling complications such as dialysis, major stroke and paraplegia constitute the main limitation of complex aortic repair. The aim of this article was to review postoperative management to mitigate complications after CAA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dias-Neto
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Health Science Center at Houston, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Health Science Center at Houston, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa Lima
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Health Science Center at Houston, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Health Science Center at Houston, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Health Science Center at Houston, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vacirca A, Dias Neto M, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Huang Y, Tenorio ER, Estrera A, Oderich GS. Timing of Intervention for Aortic Intramural Hematoma. Ann Vasc Surg 2022:S0890-5096(22)00614-8. [PMID: 36309166 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Intramural hematoma (IMH) is one of the acute aortic syndromes along with acute aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer. The three conditions can occur alone or in combination with overlapping presentation. Medical, open surgical, and endovascular treatment is tailored depending on clinical presentation, timing, and location within the aorta. Among patients who present with acute IMH affecting the ascending aorta (Type A), urgent open surgical repair is considered the primary line of treatment in patients who are suitable candidates and unstable. The management of IMH in the descending aorta and aortic arch (Type B) is similar to that applied to treat acute dissections in the same segment. Medical treatment with sequential imaging is recommended in patients with uncomplicated course, and endovascular repair is indicated in patients with rupture, persistent pain, end-organ ischemia, or rapid aortic enlargement. This review discusses the ideal timing for treatment of IMH.
Collapse
|
37
|
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS. Wider is Better for Endovascular Repair of Post-dissection Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1682-1683. [PMID: 36175652 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03284-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Barbosa Lima GB, Ocasio L, Tenorio ER, Neto MD, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Graft Pseudoaneurysm using a Duct Occluder Device with On-lay Fusion Guidance. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2022; 8:708-709. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
39
|
Abstract
Fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) has gained widespread acceptance in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. It has evolved from an alternative to treat elderly and higher risk patients to the first line of treatment in most patients with suitable anatomy, independent of the clinical risk. Currently, these devices are available off-the-shelf (ready to use) and tailored to the patient anatomy with the options of fenestrated, branched and mixed fenestrated, and branched designs. Reports from single and multicenter experiences and systematic reviews have shown lower mortality and morbidity for FB-EVAR compared with historical results of open surgical repair. The main advantages are noted on mortality, respiratory complications, acute kidney injury, and length of hospital stay. The purpose of this article is to review the advances in the endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms exploring the indications for treatment, preoperative evaluation, patient selection, device design, and implantation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme B B Lima
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2850, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tenorio ER, Dias-Neto MF, Lima GBB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Oderich GS. Lessons learned over two decades of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. Semin Vasc Surg 2022; 35:236-244. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
41
|
Paajanen P, Kärkkäinen JM, Tenorio ER, Mendes BC, Oderich GS. Effect of patient frailty status on outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1170-1179.e2. [PMID: 35697310 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the present study, we assessed the effects of patient frailty status on the early outcomes and late survival after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of consecutive patients who had undergone elective FB-EVAR from 2007 to 2019 in a single institution. A previously validated 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) was derived from the comorbidity and preoperative functional status data. An mFI-11 <0.3 was defined as low risk, 0.3 to 0.5 as medium risk, and >0.5 as high risk. The studied outcomes were 90-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE), and long-term survival. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS A total of 592 patients (155 women, mean age, 75 ± 8 years) had undergone FB-EVAR. Using the mFI-11, 310 patients (52%) were included in the low-risk, 199 (34%) in the medium-risk, and 83 (14%) in the high-risk group. The 90-day mortality was significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the medium- and low-risk groups (13%, 4%, and 3%, respectively; P < .01). The corresponding MAE rates were 27%, 18%, and 19% (P = .23). As a subgroup, 44 patients in the high-risk group had had chronic kidney disease (CKD). The 90-day mortality for these patients was as high as 23%, and 32% had experienced MAE. On multivariable analysis, the independent risk factors for 90-day mortality were CKD, respiratory disease, and a high mFI-11. The independent risk factors for MAE were female sex, CKD, larger aneurysm diameter, and the high-risk subgroup with CKD. The independent risk factors for long-term mortality were age, a low body mass index, CKD, larger aneurysm diameter, extent I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, respiratory disease, congestive heart failure, a history of cerebrovascular problems, and higher mFI-11. The estimated survival at 1 year was 91% ± 2% in the low-risk, 88% ± 2% in the medium-risk, and 78% ± 5% in the high-risk group (P < .001). The corresponding 5-year survival estimates were 60% ± 4%, 52% ± 5%, and 32% ± 6%. The mean follow-up time was 2.9 ± 2.3 years. The patients treated during the first quartile of the study period were significantly more frail than were those in the later quartiles. Also, the outcomes of FB-EVAR had improved over time. CONCLUSIONS Greater frailty was significantly associated with early mortality. Together with CKD, frailty was also associated with MAE and lower patient survival after FB-EVAR. The mFI-11 represents the accumulation of comorbidities and can be used to assist in better patient selection for FB-EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paavo Paajanen
- Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shalan A, Tenorio ER, Mascaro JG, Juszczak MT, Claridge MW, Melloni A, Bertoglio L, Chiesa R, Oderich GS, Adam DJ. Fenestrated-branched endovascular repair for distal thoraco-abdominal aortic pathology after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:867-874. [PMID: 35697307 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair (FBEVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic pathology after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR+FET). METHODS Interrogation of prospectively-maintained databases from four high volume aortic centres identified consecutive patients treated with distal FBEVAR after prior TAR+FET between August 2013 and September 2020. Primary endpoint was 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were technical success, early clinical success, mid-term survival and freedom from re-intervention. Data are presented as median (IQR). RESULTS 39 patients [21 men; median age, 73 years (67-75)] with degenerative (n=22) and post-dissection TAAAs (n=17) [median diameter 71 mm (61-78)] were identified. Distal FBEVAR was intended in 27 patients [median interval 9.8 months (6.2-16.6)], anticipated in seven and unexpected in five. 31 patients had a two (n=24) or three (n=7) stage distal FBEVAR. Reno-visceral target vessel preservation was 99.3% (145 of 146). Early primary and secondary technical success was 92% and 97%, respectively. 30-day mortality was 2.6% [n=1; respiratory failure and spinal cord ischaemia (SCI)]. Six survivors also developed SCI which was associated with complete (n=4), or partial recovery (n=2) at hospital discharge. No patients required renal replacement therapy or suffered a stroke. Early clinical success was 95%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months (23.7-49.7). Eleven patients required 16 late re-interventions. Estimated 3-year survival and freedom from re-intervention were 84±6% and 63±10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Distal FBEVAR after prior TAR+FET is associated with high technical success and low early mortality. The risk of SCI is significant although the majority of patients demonstrate full or partial recovery before hospital discharge. Mid-term patient survival is favourable but there remains a high requirement for late re-intervention. FBEVAR represents an acceptable alternative to distal open TAAA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Shalan
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota and The University of Texas Health Sciences Centre at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jorge G Mascaro
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Maciej T Juszczak
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin W Claridge
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrea Melloni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota and The University of Texas Health Sciences Centre at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Donald J Adam
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abdelhalim MA, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Modarai B. Multicenter Trans-Atlantic Experience With Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Chronic Postdissection Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
44
|
Lima GB, Ocasio L, Tenorio ER, Dias-Neto M, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mirza AK, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Endovascular Treatment of an Aortic Arch Graft Pseudoaneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Oderich GS, Wong J, Tenorio ER, Dias-Neto M, Lima GB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mendes BC, Kratzberg J, Ocasio L, Macedo TA. Feasibility of Endovascular Repair of Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysms Using Patient-Specific Single Retrograde Left Subclavian Artery Branch Stent Graft. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
46
|
Biggs JH, Tenorio ER, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Outcomes Following Urgent Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair For Pararenal And Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 85:87-95. [PMID: 35595206 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate outcomes following urgent or emergent fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) for pararenal (PRA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) in patients considered high-risk for open repair. METHODS A retrospective, single institution evaluation of outcomes following F-BEVAR of symptomatic, rapidly enlarging, or ruptured PRA or TAAA treated with physician modified endograft (PMEG) and company manufactured devices (CMD). Outcomes were technical success, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and one year aortic related outcomes. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (23 male, mean age 74±9 years) underwent F-BEVAR using PMEG or CMD over a 12-year period. Fourteen patients underwent emergent repair for contained rupture and eighteen patients underwent urgent repair for symptomatic, mycotic or rapidly growing aneurysms. Aneurysm classification was PRA in 10 patients and TAAA in 22 (9 extent IV and 13 extent I-III). Twenty-three patients (72%) were repaired with PMEG and eight patients (26%) with CMD. Technical success was 97% with a total of 98 renal-mesenteric arteries incorporated using 67 fenestrations (68%), 29 directional branches (29%) and two double-wide scallops (2%). 30-day mortality was 6%, with one patient expiring from unclear causes after hospital discharge and the other from mesenteric ischemia. MAEs otherwise occurred in sixteen patients (50%) including minor stroke in three patients, transient paraparesis and heart failure in one patient each, and early return to the operating room in six patients. Mean follow up was 24±22 months. At 1- year, overall survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality and freedom from secondary intervention were 70%±8%, 94%±3 and 83%±7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Urgent F-BEVAR of selected patients with PRA and TAAA is a feasible and potentially safe treatment in patients with suitable anatomy, with low rates of early mortality and spinal cord complications. Long-term follow up is needed to assess durability of repair and device-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joedd H Biggs
- From the Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program Mayo Clinic, 200 1(st) St NW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- From the Advanced Aortic Research Program University of Texas Health Science, 7000 Fannin St #1200, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Randall R DeMartino
- From the Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program Mayo Clinic, 200 1(st) St NW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- From the Advanced Aortic Research Program University of Texas Health Science, 7000 Fannin St #1200, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- From the Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program Mayo Clinic, 200 1(st) St NW, Rochester, MN 55905.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lima GB, Tenorio ER, Marcondes GB, Khasawneh MA, Mendes BC, DeMartino RR, Shuja F, Colglazier JJ, Kalra M, Oderich GS. Outcomes of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable stent graft for endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms using iliac branch endoprosthesis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
48
|
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Kölbel T, Gargiulo M, Timaran CH, Bertoglio L, Modarai B, Jama K, Eleshra A, Lima GBB, Scott C, Chiesa R, Jakimowicz T. Outcomes of off-the-shelf multibranched stent grafts with intentional occlusion of directional branches using endovascular plugs during endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75:1142-1150.e4. [PMID: 34748899 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the technique and outcomes of intentional occlusion of directional branches (DBs) using endovascular plugs during branched endovascular aortic repair using off-the-shelf Zenith t-Branch thoracoabdominal (TAAA) stent grafts. METHODS We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of all consecutive patients treated by branched endovascular aortic repair using off-the-shelf Zenith t-Branch TAAA stent-graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) in seven academic centers from 2013 to 2019. All patients had at least one DB intentionally occluded using extension of the branch with balloon or self-expandable covered stent, followed by placement of endovascular plugs. Intentional occlusion was indicated in patients with variations in the normal four-vessel renal-mesenteric anatomy, pre-existing dialysis, or in those who failed catheterization of a target vessel. End points were 30-day/in-hospital mortality, major adverse events, secondary interventions, target artery (TA) patency, TA instability, and patient survival. RESULTS There were 100 patients, 65 male and 35 female, with median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR], 66-75 years). Of these, 31 patients (31%) had urgent/emergent operations for symptomatic/contained ruptured aneurysms. The median aneurysm diameter was 72 mm (IQR, 61-85 mm). A total of 290 renal-mesenteric arteries were incorporated with a median of three (IQR, 3-3) vessels/patient. Indications for DB occlusion were less than four suitable renal-mesenteric targets in 84 patients or pre-existing dialysis and inability to catheterize a target vessel in eight patients each. There were 110 DBs occluded by vascular plugs, including 48 celiac axis, one superior mesenteric artery, and 61 renal DBs. Thirty-day/in-hospital mortality was 10%, including 9% for elective and 13% for urgent/emergent procedures. Major adverse events occurred in 44 patients (44%), including acute kidney injury in 19 patients (19%), estimated blood loss >1 L in 12 patients (12%), respiratory failure and new onset dialysis in six patients (6%) each, bowel ischemia in five patients (5%), and myocardial infarction and paraplegia in two patients (2%) each. The median follow-up was 5 months (range, 1-13 months). Eighteen patients (18%) required secondary interventions, none for problems related to the occluded DB. There were no endoleaks related to the occluded DB. At 2 years, primary and secondary patency and freedom from TA instability were 93% ± 3%, 97% ± 2%, and 91% ± 4%, respectively. Freedom from secondary interventions and patient survival were 75% ± 6% and 63% ± 7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intentional occlusion of DBs using endovascular plugs allows versatile use of a four-vessel off-the-shelf multi-branched TAAA stent graft in patients with variations in the normal renal and mesenteric anatomy or when technical difficulties prevent successful target vessel stenting. There were no endoleaks or secondary interventions associated with the occluded DB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Tex
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Tex.
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Bijan Modarai
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guilherme B B Lima
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Tex
| | - Carla Scott
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chait J, Tenorio ER, Mendes BC, Barbosa Lima GB, Marcondes GB, Wong J, Macedo TA, De Martino RR, Oderich GS. Impact of gap distance between fenestration and aortic wall on target artery instability following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:79-87.e4. [PMID: 35181519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Target artery (TA) instability is the most frequent indication for secondary intervention following fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gap distance between the endograft reinforced fenestration and TA origin at the aortic wall (fenestration gap, FG) on target-related outcomes following FB-EVAR. METHODS Clinical data and imaging of 430 patients enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR using manufactured stent-grafts were reviewed. Three hundred and forty patients (79%) had >1 vessel incorporated by fenestration. FG distance was retrospectively measured on postoperative imaging and classified into three groups: no gap (FG=0 mm), FG distance 1-4 mm, and FG≥5 mm. Primary outcome was freedom from TA instability. Secondary endpoints included TA-related endoleak, TA secondary intervention, and TA patency. RESULTS A total of 1558 renal-mesenteric TAs were incorporated by 1104 reinforced fenestrations and 454 directional branches (DBs), with a mean of 3.9±0.5 vessels per patient. Mean FG distance was 2.8±4.5mm with FG distance of 0mm for 646 TAs, 1-4mm for 209 TAs, and ≥5mm for 249 TAs. FG distance ≥5mm was associated with significantly lower (p<.001) freedom from TA instability, type IC/IIIC endoleak, and secondary interventions at 5-years. As compared to DBs, fenestrations with FG ≥5mm had similar primary patency and freedom from TA instability, but significantly lower freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak (91±2 vs 95±1%, log rank=0.02) and secondary interventions (87±3% vs 93±2%, log rank=0.02) at 5-years. Independent predictors of TA instability included post-dissection TAAAs (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-5.4) and FG distance ≥5mm (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-1.8). TAs incorporated by reinforced fenestrations had higher primary (99±0.8% vs 97±1.0%, p=.039) and secondary patency rates (100% vs 98±1.0%, p=.012) at 5-years compared DBs, with the lowest primary patency observed for renal DBs (80±6% v 92±2% p=.008). CONCLUSION FG distance ≥5mm was independently associated with increased risk of TA instability, type IC/IIIC endoleaks, and secondary interventions in patients treated by FB-EVAR using fenestrated designs. Targets incorporated by DBs have lower 5-year primary and secondary patency as compared to those with reinforced fenestrations, with the lowest 5-year patency of 80% for renal branches. As compared to DBs, fenestrations with FG ≥5mm carried higher risk of type IC/IIIC endoleak and secondary interventions. Independent predictors of TA instability included post-dissection TAAAs and greater FG distance, whereas dual antiplatelet therapy and larger TA diameters were protective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Chait
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
| | - Guilherme B Barbosa Lima
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | - Giulianna B Marcondes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | - Joshua Wong
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lima GB, Mirza AK, Tenorio ER, Marcondes GB, Dias-Neto M, Saqib N, Mendes BC, Oderich GS. Single-center Experience With the Femoral-to-brachial Preloaded Delivery System for Fenestrated-branched Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|