1
|
Carswell C, Taylor J, Holt RIG, Brown JVE, Ajjan R, Böhnke JR, Doran T, Kellar I, Shiers D, Wright J, Siddiqi N. A core outcome set for trials evaluating self-management interventions in people with severe mental illness and coexisting type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2024; 41:e15288. [PMID: 38239101 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia, have higher rates of type 2 diabetes and worse outcomes, compared to those without SMI and it is not known whether diabetes self-management interventions are effective for people who have both conditions. Research in this area has been impeded by a lack of consensus on which outcomes to prioritise in people with co-existing SMI and diabetes. AIMS To develop a core outcome set (COS) for use in effectiveness trials of diabetes self-management interventions in adults with both type 2 diabetes and SMI. METHODS The COS was developed in three stages: (i) identification of outcomes from systematic literature review of intervention studies, followed by multi-stakeholder and service user workshops; (ii) rating of outcomes in a two-round online Delphi survey; (iii) agreement of final 'core' outcomes through a stakeholder consensus workshop. RESULTS Seven outcomes were selected: glucose control, blood pressure, body composition (body weight, BMI, body fat), health-related quality of life, diabetes self-management, diabetes-related distress and medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS This COS is recommended for future trials of effectiveness of diabetes self-management interventions for people with SMI and type 2 diabetes. Its use will ensure trials capture important outcomes and reduce heterogeneity so findings can be readily synthesised to inform practice and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jo Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Richard I G Holt
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Ramzi Ajjan
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jan R Böhnke
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ian Kellar
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Judy Wright
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
- Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rickett MC, Kingstone T, Gupta V, Shiers D, French P, Lennox B, Crawford M, Penington E, Hedges A, Ward J, Williams R, Bateman P, Chew-Graham CA. Collaboration across the primary/specialist interface in early intervention in psychosis services: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2024:BJGP.2023.0558. [PMID: 38499296 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background People with new psychotic symptoms may be managed within an Early Intervention in Psychosis service (EIP). They may be discharged back to primary care at the end of their time in an EIP service. Aim To explore the role of primary care in supporting people with psychosis in an EIP service. Design and Setting Qualitative study, within a programme of work to explore the optimum duration of management within an EIP service. Methods Semi-structured interviews with people in EIP services, carers, general practitioners (GPs) and EIP practitioners. Findings GPs report difficulties in referring people into EIP services, have little contact with people who are supported by EIP services and are not included in planning discharge from EIP service to primary care. Conclusions This study suggests that GPs should have a role in the support of people within EIP services (in particular monitoring and managing physical health) and their carers. Inclusion of GPs in managing discharge from EIP services is vital. We suggest that a joint consultation with the service user, their carer (if they wish) along with EIP care co-ordinator and GP would make this transition smoother.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Clare Rickett
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Keele, United Kingdom
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Research and Innovation, Stafford, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Kingstone
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Keele, United Kingdom
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Research and Innovation, Stafford, United Kingdom
| | - Veenu Gupta
- Durham University, Department of Psychology, Durham, United Kingdom
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David Shiers
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Newcastle-under-Lyme, United Kingdom
| | - Paul French
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Belinda Lennox
- University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Crawford
- Imperial College London, Division of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Penington
- University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Hedges
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Ward
- Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, United Kingdom
- DHU Health Care, Derby, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan Williams
- Imperial College London, Division of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Bateman
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn A Chew-Graham
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Keele, United Kingdom
- Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust, Stafford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carney R, El-Metaal H, Law H, Savage S, Small I, Hann M, Shields G, Shiers D, Carmichael-Murphy P, Jones R, Kimber E, McDonald A, Parker S. Motiv8: a study protocol for a cluster-randomised feasibility trial of a weight management intervention for adults with severe mental illness in secure forensic services. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:48. [PMID: 38429815 PMCID: PMC10908020 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01458-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with severe mental illness have physical comorbidities which result in significant reductions in quality of life and premature mortality. Effective interventions are required that are suitable for people in secure forensic mental health services. We conducted pilot work of a multidisciplinary weight management intervention (Motiv8) which showed improvements in physical and mental health and high levels of satisfaction. We aim to test the feasibility of Motiv8 under cluster randomised conditions, with an aim to investigate the acceptability, feasibility and potential effectiveness of this intervention to supplement standard secure care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A randomised waitlist-controlled feasibility trial of a lifestyle intervention (Motiv8) + TAU compared with TAU (+ Motiv8 waitlist) for adults on secure mental health units will be conducted. Thirty-two people (4 cohorts) will be recruited from secure services in Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust. Participants will be randomly allocated to Motiv8 or TAU + Motiv8 waitlist. All participants will receive Motiv8 during the trial. Assessor-blinded physical/mental health and lifestyle assessments will be conducted at baseline, 10 weeks (post-intervention/waitlist), and after 12 weeks (post-waitlist intervention/follow-up). Motiv8 is a multidisciplinary intervention including exercise sessions, cooking/nutrition classes, physical health education, psychology sessions, sleep hygiene, peer support and medication review by pharmacy. A nested qualitative study will be conducted with a subsample of participants (n = 10) to explore their experiences of taking part. The analysis will focus on feasibility outcomes and tabulated success indicators of the study (e.g. Recruitment rates, retention rates, follow-up retention and response rates, attendance at sessions, the experience of involvement in the trial and delivery of the intervention, assessment of safety, development of a manualised intervention). Thematic analysis will be conducted through qualitative interviews. The analysis will aim to inform the development of a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been granted ethical approval from the NHS Health Research Authority and adopted onto the UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, professional and public networks, conferences and clinical services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN13539285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Carney
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Hany El-Metaal
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Heather Law
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Siobhan Savage
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ingrid Small
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Hann
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gemma Shields
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Parise Carmichael-Murphy
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Jones
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kimber
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew McDonald
- Lancashire and South Cumbria, NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK
| | - Sophie Parker
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajan S, Mitchell A, Zavala GA, Podmore D, Khali H, Chowdhury AH, Muliyala KP, Appuhamy KK, Aslam F, Nizami AT, Huque R, Shiers D, Murthy P, Siddiqi N, Siddiqi K. Tobacco use in people with severe mental illness: Findings from a multi-country survey of mental health institutions in South Asia. Tob Induc Dis 2023; 21:166. [PMID: 38098747 PMCID: PMC10720264 DOI: 10.18332/tid/174361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with severe mental illness (SMI) tend to die early due to cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, which may be linked to tobacco use. There is limited information on tobacco use in people with SMI in low- and middle-income countries where most tobacco users reside. We present novel data on tobacco use in people with SMI and their access to tobacco cessation advice in South Asia. METHODS We conducted a multi-country survey of adults with SMI attending mental health facilities in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. Using data collected with a standardized WHO STEPS survey tool, we estimated the prevalence and distribution of tobacco use and assessed receipt of tobacco cessation advice. RESULTS We recruited 3874 participants with SMI; 46.8% and 15.0% of men and women consumed tobacco, respectively. Smoking prevalence in men varied by country (Bangladesh 42.8%, India 20.1% and Pakistan 31.7%); <4% of women reported smoking in each country. Smokeless tobacco use in men also varied by country (Bangladesh 16.2%, India 18.2% and Pakistan 40.8%); for women, it was higher in Bangladesh (19.1%), but similar in India (9.9%) and Pakistan (9.1%). Just over a third of tobacco users (38.4%) had received advice to quit tobacco. Among smokers, 29.1% (n=244) made at least one quit attempt in the past year. There was strong evidence for the association between tobacco use and the severity of depression (OR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.12-1.48) and anxiety (OR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.12-1.49). CONCLUSIONS As observed in high-income countries, we found higher tobacco use in people with SMI, particularly in men compared with rates reported for the general population in South Asia. Tobacco cessation support within mental health services offers an opportunity to close the gap in life expectancy between SMI and the general population. STUDY REGISTRATION ISRCTN88485933; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN88485933 39.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukanya Rajan
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Alex Mitchell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Gerardo A. Zavala
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Danielle Podmore
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Faiza Aslam
- Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | | | | | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester City, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester City, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Pratima Murthy
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Bradford District Care National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, Hull, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom
| | - Kamran Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, Hull, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Appuhamy KK, Podmore D, Mitchell A, Ahmed HU, Ashworth M, Boehnke JR, Chongtham V, Chowdhury AH, Garcia OP, Holt RIG, Huque R, Muliyala KP, Onstenk EK, Rajan S, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Manjunatha S, Zavala GA. Risk factors associated with overweight and obesity in people with severe mental illness in South Asia: cross-sectional study in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. J Nutr Sci 2023; 12:e116. [PMID: 38033510 PMCID: PMC10687724 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2023.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Obesity is one of the major contributors to the excess mortality seen in people with severe mental illness (SMI) and in low- and middle-income countries people with SMI may be at an even greater risk. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity and overweight in people with SMI and investigate the association of obesity and overweight with sociodemographic variables, other physical comorbidities, and health-risk behaviours. This was a multi-country cross-sectional survey study where data were collected from 3989 adults with SMI from three specialist mental health institutions in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was estimated using Asian BMI thresholds. Multinomial regression models were then used to explore associations between overweight and obesity with various potential determinants. There was a high prevalence of overweight (17·3 %) and obesity (46·2 %). The relative risk of having obesity (compared to normal weight) was double in women (RRR = 2·04) compared with men. Participants who met the WHO recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake had 2·53 (95 % CI: 1·65-3·88) times greater risk of having obesity compared to those not meeting them. Also, the relative risk of having obesity in people with hypertension is 69 % higher than in people without hypertension (RRR = 1·69). In conclusion, obesity is highly prevalent in SMI and associated with chronic disease. The complex relationship between diet and risk of obesity was also highlighted. People with SMI and obesity could benefit from screening for non-communicable diseases, better nutritional education, and context-appropriate lifestyle interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alex Mitchell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Mark Ashworth
- School of Lifecourse and Population Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Jan R. Boehnke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Virtu Chongtham
- Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Olga P. Garcia
- Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico
| | - Richard I. G. Holt
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sukanya Rajan
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - S. Manjunatha
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perry BI, Mitchell C, Holt RI, Shiers D, Chew-Graham CA. Lester positive cardiometabolic resource update: improving cardiometabolic outcomes in people with severe mental illness. Br J Gen Pract 2023; 73:488-489. [PMID: 37884375 PMCID: PMC10617973 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp23x735273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin I Perry
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | | | - Richard Ig Holt
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton
| | - David Shiers
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang J, Palmier-Claus J, Wu J, Shiers D, Larvin H, Doran T, Aggarwal VR. Periodontal disease in people with a history of psychosis: Results from the UK biobank population-based study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2023; 51:985-996. [PMID: 36258297 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test the hypotheses that: (1) Prevalence of periodontal disease would be higher in people with a history of psychosis when compared to the general population and (2) Demographic, life-style related factors and co-morbid medical conditions would predict periodontal disease in people experiencing psychosis. METHODS The authors performed cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the UK Biobank study (2007-2010), identifying cases with psychosis using clinical diagnosis, antipsychotic medication, and self-report. Demographic (age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status), lifestyle-related(BMI, blood pressure, smoking and alcohol intake, physical activity) and physical co-morbidities (cancer, cardiovascular, respiratory, inflammatory disease and metabolic conditions) were included as potential risk factors for periodontal disease among people with a history of psychosis using logistic regression analyses. The analysis sample included 502,505 participants. RESULTS Risk of periodontal disease was higher in people with psychosis, regardless of how cases were identified. Patients with a clinical diagnosis had the highest proportion of periodontal disease compared to the general population (21.3% vs. 14.8%, prevalence ratio 1.40, 95% CI: 1.26-1.56). Older and female cases were more likely to experience periodontal disease. Lifestyle factors (smoking) and comorbidities (cardiovascular, cancer or respiratory disease) were associated with periodontal disease among people with a history of psychosis. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that periodontal disease is more common in people with a history of psychosis, compared to the general population. Prevention and early diagnosis of periodontal disease should be a priority for oral health promotion programmes, which should also address modifiable risk factors like smoking which also contribute to co-morbid systemic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Kang
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jasper Palmier-Claus
- Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Jianhua Wu
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | - Tim Doran
- Health Services & Policy, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hilton C, Morris A, Burnside G, Harris R, Aggarwal VR, Procter S, Griffiths R, French P, Laverty L, Lobban F, Berry K, Shiers D, Golby R, Fazekas F, Valemis K, Perry A, Newens C, Kerry E, Mupinga P, Gkioni E, Lodge C, Dawber A, Elliott E, Lunat F, Palmier-Claus J. A two-arm, randomised feasibility trial using link workers to improve dental visiting in people with severe mental illness: a protocol paper. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:157. [PMID: 37684682 PMCID: PMC10485965 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01383-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness (e.g. psychosis, bipolar disorder) experience poor oral health compared to the general population as shown by more decayed, missing and filled teeth and a higher prevalence of periodontal disease. Attending dental services allows treatment of oral health problems and support for prevention. However, people with severe mental illness face multiple barriers to attending routine dental appointments and often struggle to access care. Link work interventions use non-clinical support staff to afford vulnerable populations the capacity, opportunity, and motivation to navigate use of services. The authors have co-developed with service users a link work intervention for supporting people with severe mental illness to access routine dental appointments. The Mouth Matters in Mental Health Study aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention within the context of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) measuring outcomes related to the recruitment of participants, completion of assessments, and adherence to the intervention. The trial will closely monitor the safety of the intervention and trial procedures. METHODS A feasibility RCT with 1:1 allocation to two arms: treatment as usual (control) or treatment as usual plus a link work intervention (treatment). The intervention consists of six sessions with a link worker over 9 months. Participants will be adults with severe mental illness receiving clinical input from secondary care mental health service and who have not attended a planned dental appointment in the past 3 years. Assessments will take place at baseline and after 9 months. The target recruitment total is 84 participants from across three NHS Trusts. A subset of participants and key stakeholders will complete qualitative interviews to explore the acceptability of the intervention and trial procedures. DISCUSSION The link work intervention aims to improve dental access and reduce oral health inequalities in people with severe mental illness. There is a dearth of research relating to interventions that attempt to improve oral health outcomes in people with mental illness and the collected feasibility data will offer insights into this important area. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was preregistered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN13650779) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05545228).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Hilton
- The Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Abigail Morris
- The Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Girvan Burnside
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rebecca Harris
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Sarah Procter
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Robert Griffiths
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul French
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-Under-Lyne, UK
| | - Louise Laverty
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lobban
- The Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Golby
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Fanni Fazekas
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-Under-Lyne, UK
| | - Kyriakos Valemis
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Antonia Perry
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Connie Newens
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Eirian Kerry
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Efstathia Gkioni
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Clinical Directorate, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Lodge
- The Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Alison Dawber
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Elliott
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Farah Lunat
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Jasper Palmier-Claus
- The Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luykx JJ, Gonzalez-Diaz JM, Guu TW, van der Horst MZ, van Dellen E, Boks MP, Guloksuz S, DeLisi LE, Sommer IE, Cummins R, Shiers D, Lee J, Every-Palmer S, Mhalla A, Chadly Z, Chan SKW, Cotes RO, Takahashi S, Benros ME, Wagner E, Correll CU, Hasan A, Siskind D, Endres D, MacCabe J, Tiihonen J. An international research agenda for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. Lancet Psychiatry 2023:S2215-0366(23)00109-8. [PMID: 37329895 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00109-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Treatment-resistant symptoms occur in about a third of patients with schizophrenia and are associated with a substantial reduction in their quality of life. The development of new treatment options for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia constitutes a crucial, unmet need in psychiatry. Additionally, an overview of past and possible future research avenues to optimise the early detection, diagnosis, and management of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia is unavailable. In this Health Policy, we discuss the ongoing challenges associated with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia faced by patients and health-care providers worldwide to improve the understanding of this condition. We then revisit several clozapine guidelines, the diagnostic tests and treatment options for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, and currently applied research approaches in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. We also suggest methodologies and targets for future research, divided into innovative nosology-oriented field trials (eg, examining dimensional symptom staging), translational approaches (eg, genetics), epidemiological research (eg, real-world studies), and interventional studies (eg, non-traditional trial designs incorporating lived experiences and caregivers' perspectives). Finally, we note that low-income and middle-income countries are under-represented in studies on clozapine-resistant schizophrenia and propose an agenda to guide multinational research on the cause and treatment of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. We hope that this research agenda will empower better global representation of patients living with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia and ultimately improve their functional outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurjen J Luykx
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; GGNet Mental Health, Warnsveld, Netherlands.
| | - Jairo M Gonzalez-Diaz
- Barcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit, Neurosciences Institute, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; UR Center for Mental Health, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Clínica Nuestra Señora de la Paz, Orden Hospitalaria de San Juan de Dios, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ta-Wei Guu
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Division of Psychiatry, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Marte Z van der Horst
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; GGNet Mental Health, Warnsveld, Netherlands
| | - Edwin van Dellen
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Marco P Boks
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sinan Guloksuz
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lynn E DeLisi
- Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Iris E Sommer
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jimmy Lee
- Department of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore; Neuroscience and Mental Health, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Susanna Every-Palmer
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Ahmed Mhalla
- Department of Psychiatry, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Zohra Chadly
- Department of Pharmacology, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Sherry K W Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Robert O Cotes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shun Takahashi
- Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan; Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Osaka Metropolitan University, Habikino, Japan; Clinical Research and Education Center, Asakayama General Hospital, Sakai, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Michael E Benros
- Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elias Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - Alkomiet Hasan
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Augsburg, Medical Faculty, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Dan Siskind
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Dominique Endres
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - James MacCabe
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jari Tiihonen
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Campion J, Johnston G, Shiers D, Chew-Graham C. Why should we prioritise smoking cessation for people with mental health conditions? Br J Gen Pract 2023; 73:251-253. [PMID: 37230792 PMCID: PMC10229168 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp23x732921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Campion
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical and Strategic Codirector of Public Mental Health Implementation Centre, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Public Mental Health Advisor, World Health Organization Europe; Chair of Public Mental Health Working Group, World Psychiatric Association; Honorary Professor of Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK; Honorary Reader in early psychosis, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Honorary Senior Research Fellow, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Carolyn Chew-Graham
- GP, Manchester, UK; Professor of General Practice Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Turner E, Berry K, Quinlivan L, Shiers D, Aggarwal V, Palmier-Claus J. Understanding the relationship between oral health and psychosis: qualitative analysis. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e59. [PMID: 37038763 PMCID: PMC10134239 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with psychosis have poor oral health compared with the general population. The interaction between oral health and psychosis is likely to be complex and have important ramifications for improving dental and mental health outcomes. However, this relationship is poorly understood and rarely studied using qualitative methods. AIMS To explore patient perspectives on the relationship between oral health and psychosis. METHOD The authors recruited 19 people with experiences of psychosis from community mental health teams, early intervention in psychosis services, and rehabilitation units. Participants completed a qualitative interview. Transcripts were analysed with reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS The analysis resulted in three themes: theme 1, psychosis creates barriers to good oral health, including a detachment from reality, the threat of unusual experiences and increased use of substances; theme 2, the effects of poor oral health in psychosis, with ramifications for self-identify and social relationships; and theme 3, systems for psychosis influence oral health, with central roles for formal and informal support networks. CONCLUSIONS Psychosis was perceived to affect adherence to oral health self-care behaviours and overall oral health. Poor oral health negatively affected self-identity and social relationships. Clinical implications include a systemic approach to provide early intervention and prevention of the sequelae of dental disease, which lead to tooth loss and impaired oral function and aesthetics, which in turn affect mental health. Participants felt that mental health services play an important role in supporting people with oral health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Turner
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK; and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK; and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Leah Quinlivan
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Vishal Aggarwal
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Jasper Palmier-Claus
- The Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, UK; and Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zavala GA, Haidar-Chowdhury A, Prasad-Muliyala K, Appuhamy K, Aslam F, Huque R, Khalid H, Murthy P, Nizami AT, Rajan S, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Siddiqi K, Boehnke JR. Prevalence of physical health conditions and health risk behaviours in people with severe mental illness in South Asia: multi-country cross-sectional survey. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e43. [PMID: 36815449 PMCID: PMC9970179 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness (SMI) die earlier than the general population, primarily because of physical disorders. AIMS We estimated the prevalence of physical health conditions, health risk behaviours, access to healthcare and health risk modification advice in people with SMI in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan, and compared results with the general population. METHOD We conducted a cross-sectional survey in adults with SMI attending mental hospitals in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. Data were collected on non-communicable diseases, their risk factors, health risk behaviours, treatments, health risk modification advice, common mental disorders, health-related quality of life and infectious diseases. We performed a descriptive analysis and compared our findings with the general population in the World Health Organization (WHO) 'STEPwise Approach to Surveillance of NCDs' reports. RESULTS We recruited 3989 participants with SMI, of which 11% had diabetes, 23.3% had hypertension or high blood pressure and 46.3% had overweight or obesity. We found that 70.8% of participants with diabetes, high blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia were previously undiagnosed; of those diagnosed, only around half were receiving treatment. A total of 47% of men and 14% of women used tobacco; 45.6% and 89.1% of participants did not meet WHO recommendations for physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake, respectively. Compared with the general population, people with SMI were more likely to have diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and overweight or obesity, and less likely to receive tobacco cessation and weight management advice. CONCLUSIONS We found significant gaps in detection, prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases and their risk factors in people with SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Krishna Prasad-Muliyala
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | | | - Faiza Aslam
- Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
| | | | - Humaira Khalid
- Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
| | - Pratima Murthy
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Asad T Nizami
- Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
| | - Sukanya Rajan
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK; and School of Medicine, Keele University, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK; Hull York Medical School, UK; and Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Kamran Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK; and Hull York Medical School, UK
| | - Jan R Boehnke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK; and School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Estradé A, Onwumere J, Venables J, Gilardi L, Cabrera A, Rico J, Hoque A, Otaiku J, Hunter N, Kéri P, Kpodo L, Sunkel C, Bao J, Shiers D, Bonoldi I, Kuipers E, Fusar-Poli P. The Lived Experiences of Family Members and Carers of People with Psychosis: A Bottom-Up Review Co-Written by Experts by Experience and Academics. Psychopathology 2023; 56:371-382. [PMID: 36689938 PMCID: PMC10568611 DOI: 10.1159/000528513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Informal caregivers of individuals affected by psychotic disorder can play a key role in the recovery process. However, little research has been conducted on the lived experiences of carers and family members. We conducted a bottom-up (from lived experience to theory) review of first-person accounts, co-written between academics and experts by experience, to identify key experiential themes. First-person accounts of carers, relatives, and individuals with psychosis were screened and discussed in collaborative workshops involving individuals with lived experiences of psychosis, family members, and carers, representing various organizations. The lived experiences of family members and carers were characterized by experiential themes related to dealing with the unexpected news, the search for a reason behind the disorder, living with difficult and negative emotions, dealing with loss, feeling lost in fragmented healthcare systems, feeling invisible and wanting to be active partners in care, struggling to communicate with the affected person, fighting stigma and isolation, dealing with an uncertain future, and learning from one's mistakes and building resilience and hope. Our findings bring forth the voices of relatives and informal carers of people with psychosis, by highlighting some of the common themes of their lived experiences from the time of the initial diagnosis and throughout the different clinical stages of the disorder. Informal carers are key stakeholders who can play a strategic role, and their contributions in the recovery process merit recognition and active support by mental health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Estradé
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Juliana Onwumere
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK
| | - Jemma Venables
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ana Cabrera
- Asociación Madrileña de Amigos y Familiares de Personas con Esquizofrenia (AMAFE), Madrid, Spain
| | - Joseba Rico
- Asociación Madrileña de Amigos y Familiares de Personas con Esquizofrenia (AMAFE), Madrid, Spain
| | - Arif Hoque
- Young Person’s Mental Health Advisory Group (YPMHAG), King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jummy Otaiku
- Young Person’s Mental Health Advisory Group (YPMHAG), King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Hunter
- National Health System (NHS) South London and Maudsley (SLaM) Recovery College, London, UK
| | - Péter Kéri
- Global Alliance of Mental Illness Advocacy Networks-Europe (GAMIAN-Europe), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lily Kpodo
- South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlene Sunkel
- Global Mental Health Peer Network (GMHPN), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Jianan Bao
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopment Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, Newcastle, UK
| | - Ilaria Bonoldi
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK
| | - Paolo Fusar-Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
- OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Carswell C, Coventry PA, Brown JVE, Alderson SL, Double K, Gilbody S, Holt RIG, Jacobs R, Lister JE, Osborn DPJ, Shiers D, Najma S, Taylor J, Kellar I. A theory and evidence-based co-design approach to develop a supported self-management intervention for people with severe mental illness and type 2 diabetes (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e43597. [PMID: 37171868 DOI: 10.2196/43597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is 2 to 3 times more common among people with severe mental illness (SMI). Self-management is crucial, with additional challenges faced by people with SMI. Therefore, it is essential that any diabetes self-management program for people with SMI addresses the unique needs of people living with both conditions and the inequalities they experience within health care services. OBJECTIVE We combined theory, empirical evidence, and co-design approaches to develop a type 2 diabetes self-management intervention for people with SMI. METHODS The development process encompassed 4 steps: step 1 involved prioritizing the mechanisms of action (MoAs) and behavior change techniques (BCTs) for the intervention. Using findings from primary qualitative research and systematic reviews, we selected candidate MoAs to target in the intervention and candidate BCTs to use. Expert stakeholders then ranked these MoAs and BCTs using a 2-phase survey. The average scores were used to generate a prioritized list of MoAs and BCTs. During step 2, we presented the survey results to an expert consensus workshop to seek expert agreement with the definitive list of MoAs and BCTs for the intervention and identify potential modes of delivery. Step 3 involved the development of trigger films using the evidence from steps 1 and 2. We used animations to present the experiences of people with SMI managing diabetes. These films were used in step 4, where we used a stakeholder co-design approach. This involved a series of structured workshops, where the co-design activities were informed by theory and evidence. RESULTS Upon the completion of the 4-step process, we developed the DIAMONDS (diabetes and mental illness, improving outcomes and self-management) intervention. It is a tailored self-management intervention based on the synthesis of the outputs from the co-design process. The intervention incorporates a digital app, a paper-based workbook, and one-to-one coaching designed to meet the needs of people with SMI and coexisting type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS The intervention development work was underpinned by the MoA theoretical framework and incorporated systematic reviews, primary qualitative research, expert stakeholder surveys, and evidence generated during co-design workshops. The intervention will now be tested for feasibility before undergoing a definitive evaluation in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
|
15
|
Onwumere J, Stubbs B, Stirling M, Shiers D, Gaughran F, Rice AS, C de C Williams A, Scott W. Pain management in people with severe mental illness: an agenda for progress. Pain 2022; 163:1653-1660. [PMID: 35297819 PMCID: PMC9393797 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Onwumere
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Stirling
- Involvement Register Member of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Service User Member of Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Mind and Body Expert Advisory Group, King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
- Patient Governor of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew S.C. Rice
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda C de C Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Whitney Scott
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carswell C, Brown JVE, Lister J, Ajjan RA, Alderson SL, Balogun-Katung A, Bellass S, Double K, Gilbody S, Hewitt CE, Holt RIG, Jacobs R, Kellar I, Peckham E, Shiers D, Taylor J, Siddiqi N, Coventry P. The lived experience of severe mental illness and long-term conditions: a qualitative exploration of service user, carer, and healthcare professional perspectives on self-managing co-existing mental and physical conditions. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:479. [PMID: 35850709 PMCID: PMC9295434 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04117-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia, have higher rates of physical long-term conditions (LTCs), poorer health outcomes, and shorter life expectancy compared with the general population. Previous research exploring SMI and diabetes highlights that people with SMI experience barriers to self-management, a key component of care in long-term conditions; however, this has not been investigated in the context of other LTCs. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experience of co-existing SMI and LTCs for service users, carers, and healthcare professionals. METHODS A qualitative study with people with SMI and LTCs, their carers, and healthcare professionals, using semi-structured interviews, focused observations, and focus groups across the UK. Forty-one interviews and five focus groups were conducted between December 2018 and April 2019. Transcripts were coded by two authors and analysed thematically. RESULTS Three themes were identified, 1) the precarious nature of living with SMI, 2) the circularity of life with SMI and LTCs, and 3) the constellation of support for self-management. People with co-existing SMI and LTCs often experience substantial difficulties with self-management of their health due to the competing demands of their psychiatric symptoms and treatment, social circumstances, and access to support. Multiple long-term conditions add to the burden of self-management. Social support, alongside person-centred professional care, is a key facilitator for managing health. An integrated approach to both mental and physical healthcare was suggested to meet service user and carer needs. CONCLUSION The demands of living with SMI present a substantial barrier to self-management for multiple co-existing LTCs. It is important that people with SMI can access person-centred, tailored support for their LTCs that takes into consideration individual circumstances and priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Carswell
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - J. V. E. Brown
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - J. Lister
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - R. A. Ajjan
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Clinical and Population Sciences Department, Leeds institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - S. L. Alderson
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A. Balogun-Katung
- grid.1006.70000 0001 0462 7212Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - S. Bellass
- grid.25627.340000 0001 0790 5329Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - K. Double
- grid.498142.2Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - S. Gilbody
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK ,grid.413631.20000 0000 9468 0801Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | - C. E. Hewitt
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK ,grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - R. I. G. Holt
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK ,grid.430506.40000 0004 0465 4079National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - R. Jacobs
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - I. Kellar
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - E. Peckham
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - D. Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK ,grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - J. Taylor
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - N. Siddiqi
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK ,grid.498142.2Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK ,grid.413631.20000 0000 9468 0801Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | - P. Coventry
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK ,grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang HI, Han L, Jacobs R, Doran T, Holt RIG, Prady SL, Gilbody S, Shiers D, Alderson S, Hewitt C, Taylor J, Kitchen CEW, Bellass S, Siddiqi N. Healthcare resource use and costs for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without severe mental illness in England: longitudinal matched-cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 221:402-409. [PMID: 35049484 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2021.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 60 000 people in England have coexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and severe mental illness (SMI). They are more likely to have poorer health outcomes and require more complex care pathways compared with those with T2DM alone. Despite increasing prevalence, little is known about the healthcare resource use and costs for people with both conditions. AIMS To assess the impact of SMI on healthcare resource use and service costs for adults with T2DM, and explore the predictors of healthcare costs and lifetime costs for people with both conditions. METHOD This was a matched-cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics for 1620 people with comorbid SMI and T2DM and 4763 people with T2DM alone. Generalised linear models and the Bang and Tsiatis method were used to explore cost predictors and mean lifetime costs respectively. RESULTS There were higher average annual costs for people with T2DM and SMI (£1930 higher) than people with T2DM alone, driven primarily by mental health and non-mental health-related hospital admissions. Key predictors of higher total costs were older age, comorbid hypertension, use of antidepressants, use of first-generation antipsychotics, and increased duration of living with both conditions. Expected lifetime costs were approximately £35 000 per person with both SMI and T2DM. Extrapolating nationally, this would generate total annual costs to the National Health Service of around £250 m per year. CONCLUSIONS Our estimates of resource use and costs for people with both T2DM and SMI will aid policymakers and commissioners in service planning and resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-I Wang
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | | | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK
| | - Richard I G Holt
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK; and Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Stephanie L Prady
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK; and Hull York Medical School, University of York, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health/Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust/Primary Care and Health Sciences (Keele University), University of Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Alderson
- Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK
| | - Jo Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK
| | | | - Sue Bellass
- Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of York, UK; and Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fusar‐Poli P, Estradé A, Stanghellini G, Venables J, Onwumere J, Messas G, Gilardi L, Nelson B, Patel V, Bonoldi I, Aragona M, Cabrera A, Rico J, Hoque A, Otaiku J, Hunter N, Tamelini MG, Maschião LF, Puchivailo MC, Piedade VL, Kéri P, Kpodo L, Sunkel C, Bao J, Shiers D, Kuipers E, Arango C, Maj M. The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics. World Psychiatry 2022; 21:168-188. [PMID: 35524616 PMCID: PMC9077608 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Psychosis is the most ineffable experience of mental disorder. We provide here the first co-written bottom-up review of the lived experience of psychosis, whereby experts by experience primarily selected the subjective themes, that were subsequently enriched by phenomenologically-informed perspectives. First-person accounts within and outside the medical field were screened and discussed in collaborative workshops involving numerous individuals with lived experience of psychosis as well as family members and carers, representing a global network of organizations. The material was complemented by semantic analyses and shared across all collaborators in a cloud-based system. The early phases of psychosis (i.e., premorbid and prodromal stages) were found to be characterized by core existential themes including loss of common sense, perplexity and lack of immersion in the world with compromised vital contact with reality, heightened salience and a feeling that something important is about to happen, perturbation of the sense of self, and need to hide the tumultuous inner experiences. The first episode stage was found to be denoted by some transitory relief associated with the onset of delusions, intense self-referentiality and permeated self-world boundaries, tumultuous internal noise, and dissolution of the sense of self with social withdrawal. Core lived experiences of the later stages (i.e., relapsing and chronic) involved grieving personal losses, feeling split, and struggling to accept the constant inner chaos, the new self, the diagnosis and an uncertain future. The experience of receiving psychiatric treatments, such as inpatient and outpatient care, social interventions, psychological treatments and medications, included both positive and negative aspects, and was determined by the hope of achieving recovery, understood as an enduring journey of reconstructing the sense of personhood and re-establishing the lost bonds with others towards meaningful goals. These findings can inform clinical practice, research and education. Psychosis is one of the most painful and upsetting existential experiences, so dizzyingly alien to our usual patterns of life and so unspeakably enigmatic and human.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Fusar‐Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical‐detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK,OASIS serviceSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Department of Brain and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly,National Institute for Health Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreSouth London and MaudsleyLondonUK
| | - Andrés Estradé
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical‐detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Giovanni Stanghellini
- Department of Psychological, Territorial and Health Sciences“G. d'Annunzio” UniversityChietiItaly,Center for Studies on Phenomenology and Psychiatry, Medical Faculty“D. Portales” UniversitySantiagoChile
| | - Jemma Venables
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical‐detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Juliana Onwumere
- National Institute for Health Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreSouth London and MaudsleyLondonUK,Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK,Bethlem Royal HospitalSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustBeckenhamUK
| | - Guilherme Messas
- Mental Health DepartmentSanta Casa de São Paulo School of Medical SciencesSão PauloBrazil
| | | | - Barnaby Nelson
- OrygenParkvilleVICAustralia,Centre for Youth Mental HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA,Department of Global Health and PopulationHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | - Ilaria Bonoldi
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Ana Cabrera
- Asociación Española de Apoyo en PsicosisMadridSpain
| | - Joseba Rico
- Asociación Española de Apoyo en PsicosisMadridSpain
| | - Arif Hoque
- Young Person's Mental Health Advisory Group (YPMHAG)King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jummy Otaiku
- Young Person's Mental Health Advisory Group (YPMHAG)King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nicholas Hunter
- NHS South London and Maudsley (SLaM) Recovery CollegeLondonUK
| | | | - Luca F. Maschião
- Mental Health DepartmentSanta Casa de São Paulo School of Medical SciencesSão PauloBrazil
| | - Mariana Cardoso Puchivailo
- Mental Health DepartmentSanta Casa de São Paulo School of Medical SciencesSão PauloBrazil,Department of PsychologyFAE University CenterCuritibaBrazil
| | - Valter L. Piedade
- Mental Health DepartmentSanta Casa de São Paulo School of Medical SciencesSão PauloBrazil
| | - Péter Kéri
- Global Alliance of Mental Illness Advocacy Networks‐Europe (GAMIAN‐Europe)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Lily Kpodo
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - Jianan Bao
- OASIS serviceSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopment Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health TrustManchesterUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK,School of MedicineKeele UniversityStaffordshireUK
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- National Institute for Health Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreSouth London and MaudsleyLondonUK,Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK,Bethlem Royal HospitalSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustBeckenhamUK
| | - Celso Arango
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental HealthHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón School of Medicine, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Complutense University of MadridMadridSpain
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Farooq S, Hattle M, Dazzan P, Kingstone T, Ajnakina O, Shiers D, Nettis MA, Lawrence A, Riley R, van der Windt D. Study protocol for the development and internal validation of Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT): a clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056420. [PMID: 35396294 PMCID: PMC8996048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is associated with significant impairment of functioning and high treatment costs. Identification of patients at high risk of TRS at the time of their initial diagnosis may significantly improve clinical outcomes and minimise social and functional disability. We aim to develop a prognostic model for predicting the risk of developing TRS in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and to examine its potential utility and acceptability as a clinical decision tool. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will use two well-characterised longitudinal UK-based first-episode psychosis cohorts: Aetiology and Ethnicity in Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses and Genetics and Psychosis for which data have been collected on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We will identify candidate predictors for the model based on current literature and stakeholder consultation. Model development will use all data, with the number of candidate predictors restricted according to available sample size and event rate. A model for predicting risk of TRS will be developed based on penalised regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation will be undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. The clinical utility of the model in terms of clinically relevant risk thresholds will be evaluated using net benefit and decision curves (comparative to competing strategies). Consultation with patients and clinical stakeholders will determine potential thresholds of risk for treatment decision-making. The acceptability of embedding the model as a clinical tool will be explored using qualitative focus groups with up to 20 clinicians in total from early intervention services. Clinicians will be recruited from services in Stafford and London with the focus groups being held via an online platform. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The development of the prognostic model will be based on anonymised data from existing cohorts, for which ethical approval is in place. Ethical approval has been obtained from Keele University for the qualitative focus groups within early intervention in psychosis services (ref: MH-210174). Suitable processes are in place to obtain informed consent for National Health Service staff taking part in interviews or focus groups. A study information sheet with cover letter and consent form have been prepared and approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and social media. A lay summary will be published on collaborator websites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Farooq
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, Staffordshire, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Miriam Hattle
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Paola Dazzan
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tom Kingstone
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, Staffordshire, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Olesya Ajnakina
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Shiers
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Antonietta Nettis
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Lawrence
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London, UK
| | - Richard Riley
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brown JV, Ajjan R, Alderson S, Böhnke JR, Carswell C, Doherty P, Double K, Gilbody S, Hadjiconstantinou M, Hewitt C, Holt RI, Jacobs R, Johnson V, Kellar I, Osborn D, Parrott S, Shiers D, Taylor J, Troughton J, Watson J, Siddiqi N, Coventry PA. The DIAMONDS intervention to support self-management of type 2 diabetes in people with severe mental illness: Study protocol for a single-group feasibility study. SSM - Mental Health 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
21
|
Rajan S, Paton LW, Chowdhury AH, Zavala GA, Aslam F, Huque R, Khalid H, Murthy P, Nizami AT, Prasad Muliyala K, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Boehnke JR. Knowledge and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in People With Severe Mental Illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:785059. [PMID: 35237185 PMCID: PMC8884107 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.785059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) are likely to face disproportionate challenges during a pandemic. They may not receive or be able to respond to public health messages to prevent infection or to limit its spread. Additionally, they may be more severely affected, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS We conducted a telephone survey (May-June 2020) in a sample of 1,299 people with SMI who had attended national mental health institutes in Bangladesh and Pakistan before the pandemic. We collected information on top worries, socioeconomic impact of the pandemic, knowledge of COVID-19 (symptoms, prevention), and prevention-related practices (social distancing, hygiene). We explored the predictive value of socio-demographic and health-related variables for relative levels of COVID-19 knowledge and practice using regularized logistic regression models. FINDINGS Mass media were the major source of information about COVID-19. Finances, employment, and physical health were the most frequently mentioned concerns. Overall, participants reported good knowledge and following advice. In Bangladesh, being female and higher levels of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) predicted poor and better knowledge, respectively, while in Pakistan being female predicted better knowledge. Receiving information from television predicted better knowledge in both countries. In Bangladesh, being female, accessing information from multiple media sources, and better HRQoL predicted better practice. In Pakistan, poorer knowledge of COVID-19 prevention measures predicted poorer practice. CONCLUSION Our paper adds to the literature on people living with SMIs and their knowledge and practices relevant to COVID-19 prevention. Our results emphasize the importance of access to mass and social media for the dissemination of advice and that the likely gendered uptake of both knowledge and practice requires further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukanya Rajan
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | - Lewis W Paton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gerardo A Zavala
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Faiza Aslam
- Institute of Psychiatry, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | | | - Humaira Khalid
- Institute of Psychiatry, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Pratima Murthy
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | - Asad T Nizami
- Institute of Psychiatry, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Krishna Prasad Muliyala
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | - David Shiers
- Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service Trust, Trust Headquarters, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.,Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom.,Bradford District Care National Health Service Foundation Trust, Shipley, United Kingdom
| | - Jan R Boehnke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.,School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Balogun-Katung A, Carswell C, Brown JVE, Coventry P, Ajjan R, Alderson S, Bellass S, Boehnke JR, Holt R, Jacobs R, Kellar I, Kitchen C, Lister J, Peckham E, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Wright J, Young B, Taylor J. Exploring the facilitators, barriers, and strategies for self-management in adults living with severe mental illness, with and without long-term conditions: A qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258937. [PMID: 34699536 PMCID: PMC8547651 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with severe mental illness (SMI) have a reduced life expectancy by around 15-20 years, in part due to higher rates of long-term conditions (LTCs) such as diabetes and heart disease. Evidence suggests that people with SMI experience difficulties managing their physical health. Little is known, however, about the barriers, facilitators and strategies for self-management of LTCs for people with SMI. AIM To systematically review and synthesise the qualitative evidence exploring facilitators, barriers and strategies for self-management of physical health in adults with SMI, both with and without long-term conditions. METHODS CINAHL, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, HMIC, Medline, NICE Evidence and PsycInfo were searched to identify qualitative studies that explored barriers, facilitators and strategies for self-management in adults with SMI (with or without co-morbid LTCs). Articles were screened independently by two independent reviewers. Eligible studies were purposively sampled for synthesis according to the richness and relevance of data, and thematically synthesised. RESULTS Seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria for the review; 25 articles, reporting findings from 21 studies, were included in the synthesis. Seven studies focused on co-morbid LTC self-management for people with SMI, with the remaining articles exploring self-management in general. Six analytic themes and 28 sub-themes were identified from the synthesis. The themes included: the burden of SMI; living with co-morbidities; beliefs and attitudes about self-management; support from others for self-management; social and environmental factors; and routine, structure and planning. CONCLUSIONS The synthesis identified a range of barriers and facilitators to self-management, including the burden of living with SMI, social support, attitudes towards self-management and access to resources. To adequately support people with SMI with co-morbid LTCs, healthcare professionals need to account for how barriers and facilitators to self-management are influenced by SMI, and meet the unique needs of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abisola Balogun-Katung
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Carswell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Peter Coventry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Ramzi Ajjan
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Alderson
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Bellass
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jan R. Boehnke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Holt
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rowena Jacobs
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Kellar
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Kitchen
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Jennie Lister
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom
| | - Judy Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Young
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Onwumere J, Creswell C, Livingston G, Shiers D, Tchanturia K, Charman T, Russell A, Treasure J, Di Forti M, Wildman E, Minnis H, Young A, Davis A, Kuipers E. COVID-19 and UK family carers: policy implications. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:929-936. [PMID: 34537103 PMCID: PMC8445736 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00206-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Informal (unpaid) carers are an integral part of all societies and the health and social care systems in the UK depend on them. Despite the valuable contributions and key worker status of informal carers, their lived experiences, wellbeing, and needs have been neglected during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this Health Policy, we bring together a broad range of clinicians, researchers, and people with lived experience as informal carers to share their thoughts on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK carers, many of whom have felt abandoned as services closed. We focus on the carers of children and young people and adults and older adults with mental health diagnoses, and carers of people with intellectual disability or neurodevelopmental conditions across different care settings over the lifespan. We provide policy recommendations with the aim of improving outcomes for all carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Onwumere
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
| | - Cathy Creswell
- Department of Experimental Psychology, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kate Tchanturia
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tony Charman
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alisa Russell
- Department of Psychology, Centre of Applied Autism Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Janet Treasure
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marta Di Forti
- Department of Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emilie Wildman
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Minnis
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Glasgow, UK
| | - Allan Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Annette Davis
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Spanakis P, Peckham E, Mathers A, Shiers D, Gilbody S. The digital divide: amplifying health inequalities for people with severe mental illness in the time of COVID-19. Br J Psychiatry 2021; 219:529-531. [PMID: 35048887 PMCID: PMC8111186 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2021.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
During COVID-19, health provision and information resources have been increasingly provided via digital means (e.g. websites, apps) and this will become a standard practice beyond the pandemic. People with severe mental illness face profound health inequalities (e.g. a >20-year mortality gap). Digital exclusion puts this population at risk of heightened or compounded inequalities. This has been referred to as the 'digital divide'. For any new digital means introduced in clinical practice to augment healthcare service provision, issues of accessibility, acceptability and usability should be addressed by researchers and developers early in the design phase, and prior to full implementation, to prevent digital exclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Spanakis
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK,Correspondence: Panagiotis Spanakis.
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | | | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jones WT, Peters S, Byrne RE, Shiers D, Law H, Parker S. "It felt very special, it felt customised to me"-A qualitative investigation of the experiences of participating in a clinical trial of CBT for young people at risk of bipolar disorder. Psychol Psychother 2021; 94:686-703. [PMID: 33063921 PMCID: PMC8451762 DOI: 10.1111/papt.12313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Bipolar at Risk Trial (BART) was a feasibility randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in young people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD). This qualitative study aimed to investigate participants' experiences of trial involvement, and the acceptability of CBT for this population. DESIGN Participants were those identified as being at risk of bipolar disorder, determined by current symptoms or family history. A purposive sample of twenty-one participants from both the intervention and TAU arms of the trial was recruited. METHODS Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted by service user researchers (13 participants had received therapy and 8 TAU). Interviews were audio recorded with consent from participants and transcribed verbatim. NVivo 11 Pro software was used to conduct an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Super-ordinate themes were "adaptability and flexibility," "feeling understood and valued," and "relevance of study and intervention" which had two sub-themes-"value of the trial therapy" and "acceptability of trial processes." Participating in the trial and having therapy enabled participants to feel understood and valued by research assistants (RAs) and therapists. Participants viewed therapy as relevant to their current concerns and valued adaptability and flexibility of RAs and therapists. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the importance and value of flexibility, adaptability, and understanding in relationships between participants and trial staff. Findings also indicate that the trial processes and CBT focusing on mood swings are acceptable and relevant to participants from this at risk population. PRACTITIONER POINTS Young people at risk of bipolar disorder value a flexible approach to assessments and therapy, developing a rapport with research assistants and therapists and opening up to them when they feel comfortable to do so. CBT focusing on coping with mood swings was acceptable to the majority of participants who received it and it was perceived as helpful in ways that were personal to each participant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Theresa Jones
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
| | - Rory Edward Byrne
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
| | - David Shiers
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK,Primary Care and Health SciencesKeele UniversityUK
| | - Heather Law
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK,Youth Mental Health Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK
| | - Sophie Parker
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK,Youth Mental Health Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bellass S, Lister J, Kitchen CEW, Kramer L, Alderson SL, Doran T, Gilbody S, Han L, Hewitt C, Holt RIG, Jacobs R, Prady SL, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Taylor J. Living with diabetes alongside a severe mental illness: A qualitative exploration with people with severe mental illness, family members and healthcare staff. Diabet Med 2021; 38:e14562. [PMID: 33772867 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Diabetes is two to three times more prevalent in people with severe mental illness, yet little is known about the challenges of managing both conditions from the perspectives of people living with the co-morbidity, their family members or healthcare staff. Our aim was to understand these challenges and to explore the circumstances that influence access to and receipt of diabetes care for people with severe mental illness. METHODS Framework analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews with people with severe mental illness and diabetes, family members, and staff from UK primary care, mental health and diabetes services, selected using a maximum variation sampling strategy between April and December 2018. RESULTS In all, 39 adults with severe mental illness and diabetes (3 with type 1 diabetes and 36 with type 2 diabetes), nine family members and 30 healthcare staff participated. Five themes were identified: (a) Severe mental illness governs everyday life including diabetes management; (b) mood influences capacity and motivation for diabetes self-management; (c) cumulative burden of managing multiple physical conditions; (d) interacting conditions and overlapping symptoms and (e) support for everyday challenges. People living with the co-morbidity and their family members emphasised the importance of receiving support for the everyday challenges that impact diabetes management, and identified barriers to accessing this from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS More intensive support for diabetes management is needed when people's severe mental illness (including symptoms of depression) or physical health deteriorates. Interventions that help people, including healthcare staff, distinguish between symptoms of diabetes and severe mental illness are also needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Bellass
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - Jennie Lister
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | | | - Lyndsey Kramer
- Department of Sociology, Wentworth College, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | | | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - Richard Ian Gregory Holt
- Faculty of Medicine/Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rowena Jacobs
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health/Greater, Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust/Primary Care and Health Sciences (Keele University), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Shipley, Bradford, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - Johanna Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lister J, Han L, Bellass S, Taylor J, Alderson SL, Doran T, Gilbody S, Hewitt C, Holt RIG, Jacobs R, Kitchen CEW, Prady SL, Radford J, Ride JR, Shiers D, Wang HI, Siddiqi N. Identifying determinants of diabetes risk and outcomes for people with severe mental illness: a mixed-methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
People with severe mental illness experience poorer health outcomes than the general population. Diabetes contributes significantly to this health gap.
Objectives
The objectives were to identify the determinants of diabetes and to explore variation in diabetes outcomes for people with severe mental illness.
Design
Under a social inequalities framework, a concurrent mixed-methods design combined analysis of linked primary care records with qualitative interviews.
Setting
The quantitative study was carried out in general practices in England (2000–16). The qualitative study was a community study (undertaken in the North West and in Yorkshire and the Humber).
Participants
The quantitative study used the longitudinal health records of 32,781 people with severe mental illness (a subset of 3448 people had diabetes) and 9551 ‘controls’ (with diabetes but no severe mental illness), matched on age, sex and practice, from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (GOLD version). The qualitative study participants comprised 39 adults with diabetes and severe mental illness, nine family members and 30 health-care staff.
Data sources
The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (GOLD) individual patient data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Office for National Statistics mortality data and the Index of Multiple Deprivation.
Results
People with severe mental illness were more likely to have diabetes if they were taking atypical antipsychotics, were living in areas of social deprivation, or were of Asian or black ethnicity. A substantial minority developed diabetes prior to severe mental illness. Compared with people with diabetes alone, people with both severe mental illness and diabetes received more frequent physical checks, maintained tighter glycaemic and blood pressure control, and had fewer recorded physical comorbidities and elective admissions, on average. However, they had more emergency admissions (incidence rate ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.36) and a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than people with diabetes but no severe mental illness (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.59 to 2.26). These paradoxical results may be explained by other findings. For example, people with severe mental illness and diabetes were more likely to live in socially deprived areas, which is associated with reduced frequency of health checks, poorer health outcomes and higher mortality risk. In interviews, participants frequently described prioritising their mental illness over their diabetes (e.g. tolerating antipsychotic side effects, despite awareness of harmful impacts on diabetes control) and feeling overwhelmed by competing treatment demands from multiple morbidities. Both service users and practitioners acknowledged misattributing physical symptoms to poor mental health (‘diagnostic overshadowing’).
Limitations
Data may not be nationally representative for all relevant covariates, and the completeness of recording varied across practices.
Conclusions
People with severe mental illness and diabetes experience poorer health outcomes than, and deficiencies in some aspects of health care compared with, people with diabetes alone.
Future work
These findings can inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at addressing inequalities in this population.
Study registration
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Central Portfolio Management System (37024); and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03534921.
Funding
This project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie Lister
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sue Bellass
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jo Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sarah L Alderson
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Richard IG Holt
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Rowena Jacobs
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - John Radford
- Patient and public involvement representative, Keighley, UK
| | - Jemimah R Ride
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Han-I Wang
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Samaras K, Shiers D, Chen R, Holt RIG, Curtis J. Editorial: Keeping the Body in Mind: Scientific Effort in Advocating the Best Outcomes for People Living With Severe Mental Illness. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:831933. [PMID: 35046905 PMCID: PMC8762288 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.831933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Samaras
- Department of Endocrinology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- Adipose Biology, Clinical Obesity and Nutrition Laboratory, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- *Correspondence: Katherine Samaras,
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, University of Keele, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard I. G. Holt
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Curtis
- Mindgardens Neuroscience Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Morrison AP, Pyle M, Byrne R, Broome M, Freeman D, Johns L, James A, Husain N, Whale R, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Hudson J, Peters S, Davies L, Bowe S, Smith J, Shiers D, Joyce E, Jones W, Hollis C, Maughan D. Psychological intervention, antipsychotic medication or a combined treatment for adolescents with a first episode of psychosis: the MAPS feasibility three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-124. [PMID: 33496261 PMCID: PMC7869006 DOI: 10.3310/hta25040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When psychosis emerges in young people there is a risk of poorer outcomes, and access to evidence-based treatments is paramount. The current evidence base is limited. Antipsychotic medications show only a small benefit over placebo, but young people experience more side effects than adults. There is sparse evidence for psychological intervention. Research is needed to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention versus antipsychotic medication versus a combined treatment for adolescents with psychosis. OBJECTIVES The objective of Managing Adolescent first-episode Psychosis: a feasibility Study (MAPS) was to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to answer the question of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these three treatment options. DESIGN This was a prospective, randomised, open-blinded, evaluation feasibility trial with a single blind. Participants were allocated 1 : 1 : 1 to receive antipsychotic medication, psychological intervention or a combination of both. A thematic qualitative study explored the acceptability and feasibility of the trial. SETTING Early intervention in psychosis services and child and adolescent mental health services in Manchester, Oxford, Lancashire, Sussex, Birmingham, Norfolk and Suffolk, and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear. PARTICIPANTS People aged 14-18 years experiencing a first episode of psychosis either with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis or meeting the entry criteria for early intervention in psychosis who had not received antipsychotic medication or psychological intervention within the last 3 months. INTERVENTIONS Psychological intervention involved up to 26 hours of cognitive-behavioural therapy and six family intervention sessions over 6 months, with up to four booster sessions. Antipsychotic medication was prescribed by the participant's psychiatrist in line with usual practice. Combined treatment was a combination of psychological intervention and antipsychotic medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was feasibility (recruitment, treatment adherence and retention). We used a three-stage progression criterion to determine feasibility. Secondary outcomes were psychosis symptoms, recovery, anxiety and depression, social and educational/occupational functioning, drug and alcohol use, health economics, adverse/metabolic side effects and adverse/serious adverse events. RESULTS We recruited 61 out of 90 (67.8%; amber zone) potential participants (psychological intervention, n = 18; antipsychotic medication, n = 22; combined treatment, n = 21). Retention to follow-up was 51 out of 61 participants (83.6%; green zone). In the psychological intervention arm and the combined treatment arm, 32 out of 39 (82.1%) participants received six or more sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy (green zone). In the combined treatment arm and the antipsychotic medication arm, 28 out of 43 (65.1%) participants received antipsychotic medication for 6 consecutive weeks (amber zone). There were no serious adverse events related to the trial and one related adverse event. Overall, the number of completed secondary outcome measures, including health economics, was small. LIMITATIONS Medication adherence was determined by clinician report, which can be biased. The response to secondary outcomes was low, including health economics. The small sample size obtained means that the study lacked statistical power and there will be considerable uncertainty regarding estimates of treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to conduct a trial comparing psychological intervention with antipsychotic medication and a combination treatment in young people with psychosis with some adaptations to the design, including adaptations to collection of health economic data to determine cost-effectiveness. FUTURE WORK An adequately powered definitive trial is required to provide robust evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80567433. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Morrison
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Melissa Pyle
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rory Byrne
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Broome
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nusrat Husain
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
| | - Richard Whale
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Davies
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Samantha Bowe
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jo Smith
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emmeline Joyce
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Wendy Jones
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Daniel Maughan
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mohamed M, Rashid M, Farooq S, Siddiqui N, Parwani P, Shiers D, Thamman R, Gulati M, Shoaib A, Chew-Graham C, Mamas M. Acute myocardial infarction in several mental illness: a nationwide analysis of prevalence, management strategies and outcomes. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Severe mental illness (SMI) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. However, it is unclear whether SMI patients are just as likely to receive guideline-recommended therapy for AMI as those without mental illness.
Purpose
To examine national-level estimates of the prevalence, management strategies and in-hospital clinical outcomes of SMI patients presenting with AMI.
Methods
All AMI hospitalisations from the United States National Inpatient Sample were included, stratified by mental health status in to 5 groups: no-SMI, Schizophrenia, “Other non-organic psychoses” (ONOP), Bipolar Disorder and Major Depression. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was performed to examine the association between SMI subtypes and receipt of invasive management and subsequent in-hospital clinical outcomes, expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Out of 6,968,777 AMI hospitalisations between 2004 and 2014, a total of 439,544 (6.5%) had an SMI diagnosis. The prevalence of SMI amongst the ACS population doubled over the study period (from 4.5% in 2004 to 9.5% in 2014), primarily due to an increase in Major Depression and Bipolar Disorder diagnoses. All SMI subtypes were less likely to receive coronary angiography and PCI, with the Schizophrenia group being at least odds of either procedure (aOR 0.46 95% CI 0.45, 0.48 and aOR 0.57 95% CI 0.55, 0.59, respectively). Although patients with Schizophrenia and ONOP experienced higher crude rates of in-hospital mortality and stroke compared to those without SMI, only Schizophrenia patients were associated with increased odds of mortality (aOR 1.10 95% CI 1.04, 1.16), while ONOP were the only group at increased odds of stroke (aOR 1.53 95% CI 1.42,1.65) following multivariate adjustment. Patients with ONOP were the only group associated with increased odds of in-hospital bleeding compared to those without SMI (aOR 1.11 95% CI 1.04,1.17).
Conclusion
Patients with SMI are less likely to receive invasive management for AMI, with women and schizophrenia diagnosis being the strongest predictors of conservative management. Schizophrenia and “other non-organic psychoses” are the only SMI subtypes associated with adverse clinical outcomes after AMI. A multidisciplinary approach between psychiatrists and cardiologists could improve outcomes of this high-risk population.
Odds of management and clinical outcomes
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mohamed
- Keele University, Cardiology, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - M Rashid
- Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - S Farooq
- Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - N Siddiqui
- Nevill Hall Hospital, Abergavenny, United Kingdom
| | - P Parwani
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, United States of America
| | - D Shiers
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - R Thamman
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States of America
| | - M Gulati
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, United States of America
| | - A Shoaib
- Keele University, Cardiology, Keele, United Kingdom
| | | | - M.A Mamas
- Keele University, Cardiology, Keele, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morrison AP, Pyle M, Maughan D, Johns L, Freeman D, Broome MR, Husain N, Fowler D, Hudson J, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Shiers D, Hollis C, James A. Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7:788-800. [PMID: 32649925 PMCID: PMC7606914 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the effectiveness of treatments in early-onset psychosis is sparse. Current guidance for the treatment of early-onset psychosis is mostly extrapolated from trials in adult populations. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs versus psychological intervention (cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT] and family intervention) versus the combination of these treatments for early-onset psychosis. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of antipsychotic monotherapy, psychological intervention monotherapy, and antipsychotics plus psychological intervention in adolescents with first-episode psychosis. METHODS We did a multicentre pilot and feasibility trial according to a randomised, single-blind, three-arm, controlled design. We recruited participants from seven UK National Health Service Trust sites. Participants were aged 14-18 years; help-seeking; had presented with first-episode psychosis in the past year; were under the care of a psychiatrist; were showing current psychotic symptoms; and met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or delusional disorder, or met the entry criteria for an early intervention for psychosis service. Participants were assigned (1:1:1) to antipsychotics, psychological intervention (CBT with optional family intervention), or antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. Randomisation was via a web-based randomisation system, with permuted blocks of random size, stratified by centre and family contact. CBT incorporated up to 26 sessions over 6 months plus up to four booster sessions, and family intervention incorporated up to six sessions over 6 months. Choice and dose of antipsychotic were at the discretion of the treating consultant psychiatrist. Participants were followed up for a maximum of 12 months. The primary outcome was feasibility (ie, data on trial referral and recruitment, session attendance or medication adherence, retention, and treatment acceptability) and the proposed primary efficacy outcome was total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at 6 months. Primary outcomes were analysed by intention to treat. Safety outcomes were reported according to as-treated status, for all patients who had received at least one session of CBT or family intervention, or at least one dose of antipsychotics. The study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN80567433. FINDINGS Of 101 patients referred to the study, 61 patients (mean age 16·3 years [SD 1·3]) were recruited from April 10, 2017, to Oct 31, 2018, 18 of whom were randomly assigned to psychological intervention, 22 to antipsychotics, and 21 to antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. The trial recruitment rate was 68% of our target sample size of 90 participants. The study had a low referral to recruitment ratio (around 2:1), a high rate of retention (51 [84%] participants retained at the 6-month primary endpoint), a high rate of adherence to psychological intervention (defined as six or more sessions of CBT; in 32 [82%] of 39 participants in the monotherapy and combined groups), and a moderate rate of adherence to antipsychotic medication (defined as at least 6 consecutive weeks of exposure to antipsychotics; in 28 [65%] of 43 participants in the monotherapy and combined groups). Mean scores for PANSS total at the 6-month primary endpoint were 68·6 (SD 17·3) for antipsychotic monotherapy (6·2 points lower than at randomisation), 59·8 (13·7) for psychological intervention (13·1 points lower than at randomisation), and 62·0 (15·9) for antipsychotics plus psychological intervention (13·9 points lower than at randomisation). A good clinical response at 6 months (defined as ≥50% improvement in PANSS total score) was achieved in four (22%) of 18 patients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy, five (31%) of 16 receiving psychological intervention, and five (29%) of 17 receiving antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. In as-treated groups, serious adverse events occurred in eight [35%] of 23 patients in the combined group, two [13%] of 15 in the antipsychotics group, four [24%] of 17 in the psychological intervention group, and four [80%] of five who did not receive any treatment. No serious adverse events were considered to be related to participation in the trial. INTERPRETATION This trial is the first to show that a head-to-head clinical trial comparing psychological intervention, antipsychotics, and their combination is safe in young people with first-episode psychosis. However, the feasibility of a larger trial is unclear because of site-specific recruitment challenges, and amendments to trial design would be needed for an adequately powered clinical and cost-effectiveness trial that provides robust evidence. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Morrison
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, UK.
| | - Melissa Pyle
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel Maughan
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew R Broome
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Institute for Mental Health and Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nusrat Husain
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, UK; Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
| | - David Fowler
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) MindTech MedTech Co-operative and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Byrne R, Bird J, Reeve S, Jones W, Shiers D, Morrison A, Pyle M, Peters S. Understanding young peoples' and family members' views of treatment for first episode psychosis in a randomised controlled trial (MAPS). EClinicalMedicine 2020; 24:100417. [PMID: 32775967 PMCID: PMC7393652 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence to inform treatment decision-making in adolescents experiencing first episode psychosis (FEP). In the MAPS trial (Managing Adolescent first Episode Psychosis: a feasibility Study), adolescents with FEP received either antipsychotic medication (AP), psychological intervention (PI), or both. We investigated treatment views of young people and family members across each treatment arm of MAPS. METHODS Thirteen adolescents participating in MAPS and eighteen family members attended in-depth audio-recorded interviews to discuss trial treatments. Interviews were analysed using inductive Thematic Analysis, identifying salient themes across these accounts. FINDINGS Family members in particular reported an urgent need for treatment regardless of type. Both AP and PI were broadly viewed as acceptable treatment approaches, but for differing reasons which participants weighed against a range of concerns. AP were often seen to reduce symptoms of psychosis, though participants expressed concerns about side effects. PI were viewed as interactive treatment approaches that helped improve understanding of psychosis and enhanced coping, although some found PI emotionally and cognitively challenging. Combining treatments was seen to maximise benefits, with a perceived interaction whereby AP facilitated engagement with PI. INTERPRETATION Acceptability of and engagement with treatments for FEP may differ between individual young people and their family/carers. In order to be able to offer fully informed choices, and determine an optimum treatment approach for young people with FEP, definitive trial evidence should be established to determine wanted and unwanted treatment impacts. FUNDING NIHR HTA programme (project number 15/31/04).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R.E. Byrne
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich M25 3BL, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - J.C. Bird
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX4 7JX, UK
| | - S. Reeve
- Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - W. Jones
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich M25 3BL, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - D. Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich M25 3BL, UK
| | - A.P. Morrison
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich M25 3BL, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - M. Pyle
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich M25 3BL, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - S. Peters
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Izon E, Berry K, Law H, Shiers D, French P. “I don't think I took her fears seriously”: Exploring the experiences of family members of individuals at‐risk of developing psychosis over 12 months. Clin Psychol Psychother 2020; 27:965-976. [DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Izon
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester UK
- The Psychosis Research Unit Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Complex Trauma Research Unit Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
| | - Heather Law
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester UK
- The Psychosis Research Unit Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester UK
- The Psychosis Research Unit Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
- Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Newcastle UK
| | - Paul French
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust Ashton‐under‐Lyne UK
- Department of Psychology Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abel C, Afach S, Ayres NJ, Baker CA, Ban G, Bison G, Bodek K, Bondar V, Burghoff M, Chanel E, Chowdhuri Z, Chiu PJ, Clement B, Crawford CB, Daum M, Emmenegger S, Ferraris-Bouchez L, Fertl M, Flaux P, Franke B, Fratangelo A, Geltenbort P, Green K, Griffith WC, van der Grinten M, Grujić ZD, Harris PG, Hayen L, Heil W, Henneck R, Hélaine V, Hild N, Hodge Z, Horras M, Iaydjiev P, Ivanov SN, Kasprzak M, Kermaidic Y, Kirch K, Knecht A, Knowles P, Koch HC, Koss PA, Komposch S, Kozela A, Kraft A, Krempel J, Kuźniak M, Lauss B, Lefort T, Lemière Y, Leredde A, Mohanmurthy P, Mtchedlishvili A, Musgrave M, Naviliat-Cuncic O, Pais D, Piegsa FM, Pierre E, Pignol G, Plonka-Spehr C, Prashanth PN, Quéméner G, Rawlik M, Rebreyend D, Rienäcker I, Ries D, Roccia S, Rogel G, Rozpedzik D, Schnabel A, Schmidt-Wellenburg P, Severijns N, Shiers D, Tavakoli Dinani R, Thorne JA, Virot R, Voigt J, Weis A, Wursten E, Wyszynski G, Zejma J, Zenner J, Zsigmond G. Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron. Phys Rev Lett 2020; 124:081803. [PMID: 32167372 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.081803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
We present the result of an experiment to measure the electric dipole moment (EDM) of the neutron at the Paul Scherrer Institute using Ramsey's method of separated oscillating magnetic fields with ultracold neutrons. Our measurement stands in the long history of EDM experiments probing physics violating time-reversal invariance. The salient features of this experiment were the use of a ^{199}Hg comagnetometer and an array of optically pumped cesium vapor magnetometers to cancel and correct for magnetic-field changes. The statistical analysis was performed on blinded datasets by two separate groups, while the estimation of systematic effects profited from an unprecedented knowledge of the magnetic field. The measured value of the neutron EDM is d_{n}=(0.0±1.1_{stat}±0.2_{sys})×10^{-26} e.cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Abel
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - S Afach
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - N J Ayres
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C A Baker
- STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - G Ban
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - G Bison
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - K Bodek
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Cracow, Poland
| | - V Bondar
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Burghoff
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - E Chanel
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics and Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Z Chowdhuri
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - P-J Chiu
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - B Clement
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - C B Crawford
- University of Kentucky, 40506 Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - M Daum
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - S Emmenegger
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - L Ferraris-Bouchez
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - M Fertl
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - P Flaux
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - B Franke
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - A Fratangelo
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics and Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Geltenbort
- Institut Laue-Langevin, CS 20156 F-38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - K Green
- STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - W C Griffith
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - M van der Grinten
- STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - Z D Grujić
- Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
- Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - P G Harris
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - L Hayen
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Heil
- Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - R Henneck
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - V Hélaine
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - N Hild
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Z Hodge
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics and Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - M Horras
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - P Iaydjiev
- STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - S N Ivanov
- STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - M Kasprzak
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
- Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Y Kermaidic
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - K Kirch
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - A Knecht
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - P Knowles
- Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - H-C Koch
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
- Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - P A Koss
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Komposch
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - A Kozela
- Henryk Niedwodniczanski Institute for Nuclear Physics, 31-342 Cracow, Poland
| | - A Kraft
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - J Krempel
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - M Kuźniak
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Cracow, Poland
| | - B Lauss
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - T Lefort
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Y Lemière
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - A Leredde
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - P Mohanmurthy
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - M Musgrave
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - O Naviliat-Cuncic
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - D Pais
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - F M Piegsa
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics and Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - E Pierre
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - G Pignol
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - C Plonka-Spehr
- Department of Chemistry - TRIGA site, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - P N Prashanth
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Quéméner
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - M Rawlik
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - D Rebreyend
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - I Rienäcker
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - D Ries
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Chemistry - TRIGA site, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - S Roccia
- Institut Laue-Langevin, CS 20156 F-38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
- CSNSM, Université Paris Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay Campus, France
| | - G Rogel
- LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3, 14000 Caen, France
| | - D Rozpedzik
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Cracow, Poland
| | - A Schnabel
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - N Severijns
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Shiers
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - R Tavakoli Dinani
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - J A Thorne
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics and Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Virot
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38026 Grenoble, France
| | - J Voigt
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - A Weis
- Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - E Wursten
- Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Wyszynski
- ETH Zürich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Cracow, Poland
| | - J Zejma
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Cracow, Poland
| | - J Zenner
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Chemistry - TRIGA site, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - G Zsigmond
- Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chen Y, Farooq S, Edwards J, Chew-Graham CA, Shiers D, Frisher M, Hayward R, Sumathipala A, Jordan KP. Patterns of symptoms before a diagnosis of first episode psychosis: a latent class analysis of UK primary care electronic health records. BMC Med 2019; 17:227. [PMID: 31801530 PMCID: PMC6894287 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1462-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nature of symptoms in the prodromal period of first episode psychosis (FEP) remains unclear. The objective was to determine the patterns of symptoms recorded in primary care in the 5 years before FEP diagnosis. METHODS The study was set within 568 practices contributing to a UK primary care health record database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Patients aged 16-45 years with a first coded record of FEP, and no antipsychotic prescription more than 1 year prior to FEP diagnosis (n = 3045) was age, gender, and practice matched to controls without FEP (n = 12,180). Fifty-five symptoms recorded in primary care in the previous 5 years, categorised into 8 groups (mood-related, 'neurotic', behavioural change, volition change, cognitive change, perceptual problem, substance misuse, physical symptoms), were compared between cases and controls. Common patterns of symptoms prior to FEP diagnosis were identified using latent class analysis. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 30 years, 63% were male. Non-affective psychosis (67%) was the most common diagnosis. Mood-related, 'neurotic', and physical symptoms were frequently recorded (> 30% of patients) before diagnosis, and behavioural change, volition change, and substance misuse were also common (> 10%). Prevalence of all symptom groups was higher in FEP patients than in controls (adjusted odds ratios 1.33-112). Median time from the first recorded symptom to FEP diagnosis was 2-2.5 years except for perceptual problem (70 days). The optimal latent class model applied to FEP patients determined three distinct patient clusters: 'no or minimal symptom cluster' (49%) had no or few symptoms recorded; 'affective symptom cluster' (40%) mainly had mood-related and 'neurotic' symptoms; and 'multiple symptom cluster' (11%) consulted for three or more symptom groups before diagnosis. The multiple symptom cluster was more likely to have drug-induced psychosis, female, obese, and have a higher morbidity burden. Affective and multiple symptom clusters showed a good discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.766; sensitivity 51.2% and specificity 86.7%) for FEP, and many patients in these clusters had consulted for their symptoms several years before FEP diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Distinctive patterns of prodromal symptoms may help alert general practitioners to those developing psychosis, facilitating earlier identification and referral to specialist care, thereby avoiding potentially detrimental treatment delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Saeed Farooq
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
| | - John Edwards
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
| | | | - David Shiers
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, M25 3BL UK
| | | | - Richard Hayward
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Athula Sumathipala
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Kelvin P. Jordan
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Crawford MJ, Huddart D, Craig E, Zalewska K, Quirk A, Shiers D, Strathdee G, Cooper SJ. Impact of secondary care financial incentives on the quality of physical healthcare for people with psychosis: a longitudinal controlled study. Br J Psychiatry 2019; 215:720-725. [PMID: 31272513 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have repeatedly been expressed about the quality of physical healthcare that people with psychosis receive. AIMS To examine whether the introduction of a financial incentive for secondary care services led to improvements in the quality of physical healthcare for people with psychosis. METHOD Longitudinal data were collected over an 8-year period on the quality of physical healthcare that people with psychosis received from 56 trusts in England before and after the introduction of the financial incentive. Control data were also collected from six health boards in Wales where a financial incentive was not introduced. We calculated the proportion of patients whose clinical records indicated that they had been screened for seven key aspects of physical health and whether they were offered interventions for problems identified during screening. RESULTS Data from 17 947 people collected prior to (2011 and 2013) and following (2017) the introduction of the financial incentive in 2014 showed that the proportion of patients who received high-quality physical healthcare in England rose from 12.85% to 31.65% (difference 18.80, 95% CI 17.37-20.21). The proportion of patients who received high-quality physical healthcare in Wales during this period rose from 8.40% to 13.96% (difference 5.56, 95% CI 1.33-10.10). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that financial incentives for secondary care mental health services are associated with marked improvements in the quality of care that patients receive. Further research is needed to examine their impact on aspects of care that are not incentivised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike J Crawford
- Professor of Mental Health Research, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London; and College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
| | - Daniel Huddart
- Undergraduate Medical Student, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Eleanor Craig
- Deputy Programme Manager, College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
| | - Krysia Zalewska
- Programme Manager, College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
| | - Alan Quirk
- Senior Programme Manager, College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Clinical Advisor, College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
| | | | - Stephen J Cooper
- Clinical Lead, College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Campion J, Taylor MJ, McDaid D, Park AL, Shiers D. Applying economic models to estimate local economic benefits of improved coverage of early intervention for psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 2019; 13:1424-1430. [PMID: 30740880 DOI: 10.1111/eip.12787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Early Intervention Psychosis Services (EIPS) for people experiencing First Episode Psychosis (FEP) offer important clinical and non-clinical benefits over standard care. Similarly, intervention for Clinical High Risk for Psychosis state (CHR-P) can prevent psychosis, ameliorate symptoms and have non-clinical benefits. This study aimed to estimate associated local economic benefits of FEP and CHR-P services compared with standard care. METHODS Across four south London boroughs, proportion of annual number of new cases of FEP and CHR-P seen by early intervention services was estimated. Economic modelling conducted for England's mental health strategy was applied to estimate local economic impacts of current and improved service provision. RESULTS Across four London boroughs during 2011/2012, proportion of 15-34 year olds with FEP seen by EIPS was 100.2% assuming 80/100 000 annual incidence whereas proportion with CHR-P seen by CHR-P services was 4.1% assuming 200/100 000 annual incidence. Application of economic modelling suggests that provision of EIPS to reach all new FEP cases each year would free up resources of £13.1m over 10 years including £2.0m to National Health Service (NHS) after the first year. Scaling up to reach all new CHR-P cases each year would free up resources of £19.7m over 10 years with an estimated 10-year cost of implementation gap for each 1 year cohort of £18.9m. An earlier related briefing resulted in increased funding for EIPS and new CHR-P services despite overall cuts to mental health services. CONCLUSIONS Estimation of local economic impacts of FEP and CHR-P services was associated with improved investment in such services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Campion
- Psychosis Clinical Academic Group and Public Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew J Taylor
- Early Psychosis: Intervention and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Psychosis Clinical Academic Group, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David McDaid
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - A-La Park
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gossage-Worrall R, Hind D, Barnard-Kelly KD, Shiers D, Etherington A, Swaby L, Holt RIG. STructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:358. [PMID: 31722694 PMCID: PMC6854755 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2282-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND STEPWISE is a theory-informed self-management education programme that was co-produced with service users, healthcare professionals and interventionists to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia. We report the process evaluation to inform understanding about the intervention and its effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated its efficacy. METHODS Following the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for developing and evaluating complex interventions, we explored implementation quality. We considered causal mechanisms, unanticipated consequences and contextual factors associated with variation in actual and intended outcomes, and integrated treatment fidelity, using the programme theory and a pipeline logic model. We followed a modified version of Linnan and Steckler's framework and single case design. Qualitative data from semi-structured telephone interviews with service-users (n = 24), healthcare professionals delivering the intervention (n = 20) and interventionists (n = 7) were triangulated with quantitative process and RCT outcome data and with observations by interventionists, to examine convergence within logic model components. RESULTS Training and course materials were available although lacked co-ordination in some trusts. Healthcare professionals gained knowledge and some contemplated changing their practice to reflect the (facilitative) 'style' of delivery. They were often responsible for administrative activities increasing the burden of delivery. Healthcare professionals recognised the need to address antipsychotic-induced weight gain and reported potential value from the intervention (subject to the RCT results). However, some doubted senior management commitment and sustainability post-trial. Service-users found the intervention highly acceptable, especially being in a group of people with similar experiences. Service-users perceived weight loss and lifestyle benefits; however, session attendance varied with 23% (n = 47) attending all group-sessions and 17% (n = 36) attending none. Service-users who lost weight wanted closer monitoring and many healthcare professionals wanted to monitor outcomes (e.g. weight) but it was outside the intervention design. No clinical or cost benefit was demonstrated from the intermediate outcomes (RCT) and any changes in RCT outcomes were not due to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS This process evaluation provides a greater understanding of why STEPWISE was unsuccessful in promoting weight loss during the clinical trial. Further research is required to evaluate whether different levels of contact and objective monitoring can support people with schizophrenia to lose weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN19447796. Registered 20 March 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- 0000 0004 1936 9262grid.11835.3eClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Katharine D. Barnard-Kelly
- 0000 0001 0728 4630grid.17236.31Faculty of Health & Social Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, UK
| | - David Shiers
- 0000000121662407grid.5379.8Honorary Research Consultant, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Honorary Reader in Early Psychosis, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Angela Etherington
- Patient Representative, Independent Service User Consultant, Manchester, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- 0000 0004 1936 9262grid.11835.3eClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Richard I. G. Holt
- 0000 0004 1936 9297grid.5491.9Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK ,grid.430506.4University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bellass S, Taylor J, Han L, Prady SL, Shiers D, Jacobs R, Holt RIG, Radford J, Gilbody S, Hewitt C, Doran T, Alderson SL, Siddiqi N. Exploring Severe Mental Illness and Diabetes: Protocol for a Longitudinal, Observational, and Qualitative Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:13407. [PMID: 31493324 PMCID: PMC6786849 DOI: 10.2196/13407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The average life expectancy for people with a severe mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder is 15 to 20 years less than that for the population as a whole. Diabetes contributes significantly to this inequality, being 2 to 3 times more prevalent in people with SMI. Various risk factors have been implicated, including side effects of antipsychotic medication and unhealthy lifestyles, which often occur in the context of socioeconomic disadvantage and health care inequality. However, little is known about how these factors may interact to influence the risk of developing diabetes and poor diabetic outcomes, or how the organization and provision of health care may contribute. Objective This study aims to identify the determinants of diabetes and to explore variation in diabetes outcomes for people with SMI. Methods This study will employ a concurrent mixed methods design combining the interrogation of electronic primary care health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD GOLD) with qualitative interviews with adults with SMI and diabetes, their relatives and friends, and health care staff. The study has been funded for 2 years, from September 2017 to September 2019, and data collection has recently ended. Results CPRD and linked health data will be used to explore the association of sociodemographics, illness, and health care–related factors with both the development and outcomes of type 2 diabetes in people with SMI. Experiences of managing the comorbidity and accessing health care will be explored through qualitative interviews using topic guides informed by evidence synthesis and expert consultation. Findings from both datasets will be merged to develop a more comprehensive understanding of diabetes risks, interventions, and outcomes for people with SMI. Findings will be translated into recommendations for interventions and services using co-design workshops. Conclusions Improving diabetes outcomes for people with SMI is a high-priority area nationally and globally. Understanding how risk factors combine to generate high prevalence of diabetes and poor diabetic outcomes for this population is a necessary first step in developing health care interventions to improve outcomes for people with diabetes and SMI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03534921; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03534921
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Bellass
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Johanna Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Lu Han
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie L Prady
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Prestwich Hospital, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust & The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Rowena Jacobs
- Centre for Health Economics, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - John Radford
- DIAMONDS VOICE Patient and Public Involvement Panel, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah L Alderson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Firth J, Siddiqi N, Koyanagi A, Siskind D, Rosenbaum S, Galletly C, Allan S, Caneo C, Carney R, Carvalho AF, Chatterton ML, Correll CU, Curtis J, Gaughran F, Heald A, Hoare E, Jackson SE, Kisely S, Lovell K, Maj M, McGorry PD, Mihalopoulos C, Myles H, O'Donoghue B, Pillinger T, Sarris J, Schuch FB, Shiers D, Smith L, Solmi M, Suetani S, Taylor J, Teasdale SB, Thornicroft G, Torous J, Usherwood T, Vancampfort D, Veronese N, Ward PB, Yung AR, Killackey E, Stubbs B. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6:675-712. [PMID: 31324560 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30132-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 685] [Impact Index Per Article: 137.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Firth
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Hull York Medical School, Bradford, UK; Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dan Siskind
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Simon Rosenbaum
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cherrie Galletly
- Ramsay Health Care Mental Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Stephanie Allan
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Constanza Caneo
- Departamento de Psiquiatría, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rebekah Carney
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jackie Curtis
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Keeping the Body in Mind Program, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Adrian Heald
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK
| | - Erin Hoare
- Food and Mood Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah E Jackson
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Kisely
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Patrick D McGorry
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hannah Myles
- Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Brian O'Donoghue
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Toby Pillinger
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Medical Research Council London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jerome Sarris
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Melbourne Clinic, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Felipe B Schuch
- Department of Sports Methods and Techniques, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lee Smith
- Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marco Solmi
- Neurosciences Department and Padua Neuroscience Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Shuichi Suetani
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Wacol, QLD, Australia
| | - Johanna Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Hull York Medical School, Bradford, UK
| | - Scott B Teasdale
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Keeping the Body in Mind Program, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Torous
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tim Usherwood
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of General Practice, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Davy Vancampfort
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Psychiatric Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium
| | - Nicola Veronese
- National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Aging Branch, Padova, Italy
| | - Philip B Ward
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Schizophrenia Research Unit, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison R Yung
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eoin Killackey
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pyle M, Broome MR, Joyce E, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Freeman D, Fowler D, Haddad PM, Shiers D, Hollis C, Smith J, Liew A, Byrne RE, French P, Peters S, Hudson J, Davies L, Emsley R, Yung A, Birchwood M, Longden E, Morrison AP. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of CBT vs antipsychotics vs both in 14-18-year-olds: Managing Adolescent first episode Psychosis: a feasibility study (MAPS). Trials 2019; 20:395. [PMID: 31272477 PMCID: PMC6611021 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3506-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Adolescent-onset psychosis is associated with more severe symptoms and poorer outcomes than adult-onset psychosis. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend that adolescents with first episode psychosis (FEP) should be offered a combination of antipsychotic medication (APs), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family intervention (FI). The evidence for APs in treating psychosis is limited in adolescents compared to adults. Nevertheless, it indicates that APs can reduce overall symptoms in adolescents but may cause more severe side effects, including cardiovascular and metabolic effects, than in adults. CBT and FI can improve outcomes in adults, but there are no studies of psychological interventions (PI) in patients under 18 years old. Given this limited evidence base, NICE made a specific research recommendation for determining the clinical and cost effectiveness of APs versus PI versus both treatments for adolescent FEP. Methods/design The current study aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of conducting such a trial by recruiting 14–18-year-olds with a first episode of psychosis into a feasibility prospective randomised open blinded evaluation (PROBE) design, three-arm, randomised controlled trial of APs alone versus PI alone versus a combination of both treatments. We aimed to recruit 90 participants from Early Intervention and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Teams in seven UK sites. APs were prescribed by participants’ usual psychiatrists. PI comprised standardised cognitive behavioural therapy and family intervention sessions. Discussion This is the first study to compare APs to PI in an adolescent population with FEP. Recruitment finished on 31 October 2018. The study faced difficulties with recruitment across most sites due to factors including clinician and service-user treatment preferences. Trial registration Current controlled trial with ISRCTN, ISRCTN80567433. Registered on 27 February 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3506-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Pyle
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Matthew R Broome
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. .,Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. .,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX4 7JX, UK.
| | - Emmeline Joyce
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Health Sciences Building, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, Nine Edinburgh BioQuarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX4 7JX, UK
| | - David Fowler
- School of Psychology, Pevensey Building, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QH, UK
| | - Peter M Haddad
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Department of Psychiatry, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - David Shiers
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Jo Smith
- School of Allied Health and Community, Bredon Building, University of Worcester, Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK
| | - Ashley Liew
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.,Forward Thinking Birmingham, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Finch Road, Lozells, B19 1HS, UK
| | - Rory E Byrne
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Paul French
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Health Sciences Building, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Linda Davies
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Jean MacFarlane Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Alison Yung
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Max Birchwood
- Warwick Medical School-Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Eleanor Longden
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Anthony P Morrison
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, M25 3BL, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Holt RI, Hind D, Gossage-Worrall R, Bradburn MJ, Saxon D, McCrone P, Morris TA, Etherington A, Shiers D, Barnard K, Swaby L, Edwardson C, Carey ME, Davies MJ, Dickens CM, Doherty Y, French P, Greenwood KE, Kalidindi S, Khunti K, Laugharne R, Pendlebury J, Rathod S, Siddiqi N, Wright S, Waller G, Gaughran F, Barnett J, Northern A. Structured lifestyle education to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first episode psychosis: the STEPWISE RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-160. [PMID: 30499443 DOI: 10.3310/hta22650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is twice as common in people with schizophrenia as in the general population. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance recommends that people with psychosis or schizophrenia, especially those taking antipsychotics, be offered a healthy eating and physical activity programme by their mental health care provider. There is insufficient evidence to inform how these lifestyle services should be commissioned. OBJECTIVES To develop a lifestyle intervention for people with first episode psychosis or schizophrenia and to evaluate its clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, delivery and acceptability. DESIGN A two-arm, analyst-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, with a 1 : 1 allocation ratio, using web-based randomisation; a mixed-methods process evaluation, including qualitative case study methods and logic modelling; and a cost-utility analysis. SETTING Ten community mental health trusts in England. PARTICIPANTS People with first episode psychosis, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. INTERVENTIONS Intervention group: (1) four 2.5-hour group-based structured lifestyle self-management education sessions, 1 week apart; (2) multimodal fortnightly support contacts; (3) three 2.5-hour group booster sessions at 3-monthly intervals, post core sessions. Control group: usual care assessed through a longitudinal survey. All participants received standard written lifestyle information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was change in weight (kg) at 12 months post randomisation. The key secondary outcomes measured at 3 and 12 months included self-reported nutrition (measured with the Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education questionnaire), objectively measured physical activity measured by accelerometry [GENEActiv (Activinsights, Kimbolton, UK)], biomedical measures, adverse events, patient-reported outcome measures and a health economic assessment. RESULTS The trial recruited 414 participants (intervention arm: 208 participants; usual care: 206 participants) between 10 March 2015 and 31 March 2016. A total of 341 participants (81.6%) completed the trial. A total of 412 participants were analysed. After 12 months, weight change did not differ between the groups (mean difference 0.0 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.59 to 1.67 kg; p = 0.964); physical activity, dietary intake and biochemical measures were unchanged. Glycated haemoglobin, fasting glucose and lipid profile were unchanged by the intervention. Quality of life, psychiatric symptoms and illness perception did not change during the trial. There were three deaths, but none was related to the intervention. Most adverse events were expected and related to the psychiatric illness. The process evaluation showed that the intervention was acceptable, with participants valuing the opportunity to interact with others facing similar challenges. Session feedback indicated that 87.2% of participants agreed that the sessions had met their needs. Some indicated the desire for more ongoing support. Professionals felt that the intervention was under-resourced and questioned the long-term sustainability within current NHS settings. Professionals would have preferred greater access to participants' behaviour data to tailor the intervention better. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from the health-care perspective is £246,921 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from the societal perspective is £367,543 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Despite the challenges of undertaking clinical research in this population, the trial successfully recruited and retained participants, indicating a high level of interest in weight management interventions; however, the STEPWISE intervention was neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Further research will be required to define how overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia should be managed. The trial results suggest that lifestyle programmes for people with schizophrenia may need greater resourcing than for other populations, and interventions that have been shown to be effective in other populations, such as people with diabetes mellitus, are not necessarily effective in people with schizophrenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19447796. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 65. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Ig Holt
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - David Saxon
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tiyi A Morris
- King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katharine Barnard
- Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Marian E Carey
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Yvonne Doherty
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.,Psychological Medicine, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Paul French
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kathryn E Greenwood
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Sridevi Kalidindi
- Rehabilitation and Recovery, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Richard Laugharne
- Research and Innovation, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Redruth, UK
| | | | - Shanaya Rathod
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.,Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Stephen Wright
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Glenn Waller
- Sheffield Health & Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,National Psychosis Unit and Research and Development Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Janette Barnett
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alison Northern
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mohamed MO, Rashid M, Farooq S, Siddiqui N, Parwani P, Shiers D, Thamman R, Gulati M, Shoaib A, Chew-Graham C, Mamas MA. Acute Myocardial Infarction in Severe Mental Illness: Prevalence, Clinical Outcomes, and Process of Care in U.S. Hospitalizations. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35:821-830. [PMID: 31292080 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe mental illness (SMI) is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. We sought to examine the prevalence, clinical outcomes, and management strategy of patients with SMI presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS All AMI hospitalizations from the National Inpatient Sample were included, stratified by mental health status into 5 groups: no SMI, schizophrenia, other non-organic psychoses (ONOP), bipolar disorder, and major depression. Regression analyses were performed to assess the association (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], P ≤ 0.001 for all outcomes) between SMI subtypes and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Of 6,968,777 AMI hospitalizations between 2004 and 2014, 439,544 patients (6.5%) had an SMI diagnosis. Although patients with schizophrenia and ONOP experienced higher crude rates of in-hospital mortality and stroke compared with those without SMI, only schizophrenic patients were at increased odds of mortality (OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.16), whereas ONOP was the only group at increased odds of stroke (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.42-1.65) after multivariate adjustment. Patients with ONOP were the only group associated with increased odds of in-hospital bleeding compared with those without SMI (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17). All those with SMI subtypes were less likely to receive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, with the schizophrenia group being at least odds of either procedure (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.45-0.48 and OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.55-0.59, respectively). CONCLUSION Schizophrenia and ONOP are the only SMI subtypes associated with adverse clinical outcomes after AMI. However, all patients with SMI were less likely to receive invasive management for AMI, with female gender and schizophrenia diagnosis being the strongest predictors of conservative management. A multidisciplinary approach between psychiatrists and cardiologists could improve the outcomes of this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Osama Mohamed
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Rashid
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Saeed Farooq
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom; Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Nishat Siddiqui
- Nevill Hall Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Purvi Parwani
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ritu Thamman
- Department of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Martha Gulati
- Division of Cardiology, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Ahmad Shoaib
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Chew-Graham
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom; Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Palmier-Claus JE, Shiers D, French P, Harris R, Laverty L. Oral health in psychosis: An unmet need. Schizophr Res 2019; 204:442. [PMID: 30243854 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J E Palmier-Claus
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - D Shiers
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - P French
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - R Harris
- Oral Health Service Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - L Laverty
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Holt RIG, Gossage-Worrall R, Hind D, Bradburn MJ, McCrone P, Morris T, Edwardson C, Barnard K, Carey ME, Davies MJ, Dickens CM, Doherty Y, Etherington A, French P, Gaughran F, Greenwood KE, Kalidindi S, Khunti K, Laugharne R, Pendlebury J, Rathod S, Saxon D, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Swaby EA, Waller G, Wright S. Structured lifestyle education for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first-episode psychosis (STEPWISE): randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2019; 214:63-73. [PMID: 30251622 PMCID: PMC6330076 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a major challenge for people with schizophrenia.AimsWe assessed whether STEPWISE, a theory-based, group structured lifestyle education programme could support weight reduction in people with schizophrenia. METHOD In this randomised controlled trial (study registration: ISRCTN19447796), we recruited adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis from ten mental health organisations in England. Participants were randomly allocated to the STEPWISE intervention or treatment as usual. The 12-month intervention comprised four 2.5 h weekly group sessions, followed by 2-weekly maintenance contact and group sessions at 4, 7 and 10 months. The primary outcome was weight change after 12 months. Key secondary outcomes included diet, physical activity, biomedical measures and patient-related outcome measures. Cost-effectiveness was assessed and a mixed-methods process evaluation was included. RESULTS Between 10 March 2015 and 31 March 2016, we recruited 414 people (intervention 208, usual care 206) with 341 (84.4%) participants completing the trial. At 12 months, weight reduction did not differ between groups (mean difference 0.0 kg, 95% CI -1.6 to 1.7, P = 0.963); physical activity, dietary intake and biochemical measures were unchanged. STEPWISE was well-received by participants and facilitators. The healthcare perspective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £246 921 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS Participants were successfully recruited and retained, indicating a strong interest in weight interventions; however, the STEPWISE intervention was neither clinically nor cost-effective. Further research is needed to determine how to manage overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia.Declaration of interestR.I.G.H. received fees for lecturing, consultancy work and attendance at conferences from the following: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lundbeck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Otsuka, Sanofi, Sunovion, Takeda, MSD. M.J.D. reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Servier, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc.; and, grants from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen. K.K. has received fees for consultancy and speaker for Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Servier and Merck Sharp & Dohme. He has received grants in support of investigator and investigator-initiated trials from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck Sharp & Dohme. K.K. has received funds for research, honoraria for speaking at meetings and has served on advisory boards for Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novo Nordisk. D.Sh. is expert advisor to the NICE Centre for guidelines; board member of the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH); clinical advisor (paid consultancy basis) to National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP); views are personal and not those of NICE, NCCMH or NCAP. J.P. received personal fees for involvement in the study from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) grant. M.E.C. and Y.D. report grants from NIHR Health Technology Assessment, during the conduct of the study; and The Leicester Diabetes Centre, an organisation (employer) jointly hosted by an NHS Hospital Trust and the University of Leicester and who is holder (through the University of Leicester) of the copyright of the STEPWISE programme and of the DESMOND suite of programmes, training and intervention fidelity framework that were used in this study. S.R. has received honorarium from Lundbeck for lecturing. F.G. reports personal fees from Otsuka and Lundbeck, personal fees and non-financial support from Sunovion, outside the submitted work; and has a family member with professional links to Lilly and GSK, including shares. F.G. is in part funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care Funding scheme, by the Maudsley Charity and by the Stanley Medical Research Institute and is supported by the by the Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard I. G. Holt
- Professor in Diabetes and Endocrinology, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton andHonorary Consultant Physician, Division B, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK,Correspondence: Richard I. G. Holt, The IDS Building (MP887), Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
- Trial Manager (Research Associate), Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Reader in Complex Interventions and Assistant Director, Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael J. Bradburn
- Senior Medical Statistician, Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Professor of Health Economics and Director of King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Tiyi Morris
- Research Assistant, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Charlotte Edwardson
- Associate Professor in Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Health, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Katharine Barnard
- Health Psychologist and Visiting Professor, Faculty of Health and Social Science, University of Bournemouth, UK
| | - Marian E. Carey
- Director: Structured Education Research Portfolio, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicesterand Honorary Associate Professor, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie J. Davies
- Professor of Diabetes Medicine, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Chris M. Dickens
- Professor of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Yvonne Doherty
- Consultant Clinical Psychologist and Senior Research Associate, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK
| | | | - Paul French
- Associate Director, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- Reader, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London and Consultant Psychiatrist and Director of Research, National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Kathryn E. Greenwood
- Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Professor in Clinical Psychology, Sussex Psychosis Research Interest Group, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, UK
| | - Sridevi Kalidindi
- Consultant Psychiatrist, Rehabilitation and Recovery, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Senior Clinical Lecturer, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Professor of Primary Care Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Richard Laugharne
- Consultant Psychiatrist and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - Shanaya Rathod
- Consultant Psychiatrist and Director of Research, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust and Visiting Professor, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, UK
| | - David Saxon
- Research Fellow, Mental Health Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Honorary Research Consultant, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust andHonorary Reader in Early Psychosis, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Clinical Senior Lecturer in Psychiatry, Health Sciences, University of York, Hull York Medical School and Consultant Psychiatrist, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Elizabeth A. Swaby
- Study Manager, Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Glenn Waller
- Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Stephen Wright
- Lead Consultant, Early Intervention Psychiatry, Tees Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Carey ME, Barnett J, Doherty Y, Barnard K, Daly H, French P, Gossage-Worrall R, Hadjiconstantinou M, Hind D, Mitchell J, Northern A, Pendlebury J, Rathod S, Shiers D, Taylor C, Holt RIG. Reducing weight gain in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and first episode psychosis: describing the process of developing the STructured lifestyle Education for People With SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE) intervention. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:186. [PMID: 30574354 PMCID: PMC6297970 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0378-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Obesity is twice as common in people with schizophrenia as the general population and associated with significantly worsened psychiatric and physical health. Despite National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for the management of psychosis recommending that mental health services offer lifestyle programmes to people with schizophrenia to improve physical health, this is not currently occurring. The aim of the STEPWISE research programme was to develop a lifestyle intervention addressing obesity and preventing weight gain in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or first episode psychosis taking antipsychotic medication, through an approach and fundamental principles drawn from existing diabetes and diabetes prevention interventions. This paper describes the often under-reported process of developing such an intervention from first principles. Methods Following an extensive literature review, an iterative cycle of development with input from people with schizophrenia, mental healthcare professionals, facilitators, and other stakeholders, a new weight management intervention for the target group was developed. A set of four core weekly sessions was piloted in Sheffield, followed at 3-monthly intervals by three booster sessions and telephone support contact once every 2 weeks, to form an intervention lasting 12 months. Facilitators were provided with a 4-day training package to support delivery of the intervention. Results This paper reports the process of development, including challenges and how these were addressed. It describes how user input influenced the structure, topics, and approach of the intervention. The outcome of this process was a feasible and acceptable lifestyle intervention to support people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or first episode psychosis to manage their weight. This pilot provided opportunities for refinement of the intervention and facilitator training prior to testing in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Key findings from the pilot were linked to accessibility, focus, uptake, and retention, which influenced session length, travel arrangements, refreshment, breaks, and supporting tools to incentivise participants. Conclusions The STEPWISE intervention has been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial in 10 mental health trusts in England, and the results will be published in the British Journal of Psychiatry and the NIHR Journals Library. Trial registration ISRCTN19447796. Date registered: 20/03/2014
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian E Carey
- 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,2Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.,Kairos Communications and Research Ltd, 69 Avenue Road Extension, Leicester, LE2 3EP UK
| | - Janette Barnett
- 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Yvonne Doherty
- 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Katherine Barnard
- 3Faculty of Health & Social Science, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Heather Daly
- 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Paul French
- 4Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Hind
- 5Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jonathan Mitchell
- 6Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Northern
- 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - John Pendlebury
- 4Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - David Shiers
- 4Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Cheryl Taylor
- 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Richard I G Holt
- 8Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southhampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Morrison AP, Law H, Shiers D, Yung AR, Haddad PM. Stand-alone cognitive behavioural therapy is not in clinical equipoise with antipsychotic treatment - Author's reply. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:540-541. [PMID: 29941130 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30218-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Morrison
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Heather Law
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Alison R Yung
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter M Haddad
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reduced life expectancies are recorded in adults with psychotic disorders. Informal carers play key roles in improving illness outcomes for patients, including significantly reducing rates of relapse and hospitalisation. There is, however, a dearth of literature detailing carers' perspectives on physical health problems in the relatives they care for and implications for those in the caregiving role. The study sought to explore carers' subjective experiences of supporting a relative with psychosis and physical health problems. METHODS Carers of adults with psychosis were interviewed individually, or as part of a group, about physical health problems in the relatives they care for. RESULTS Five key themes were identified from the interviews that reflected (1) ubiquity of physical health problems in psychosis, (2) gaps in service provision for those living with mental and physical health problems, (3) carers' role in responding to service gaps, (4) difficult conversations and (5) impact on carer health. CONCLUSION Service initiatives that are designed to improve patient physical health in psychosis should not overlook the role that informal carers might have in supporting this process. The implications that patient physical health problems present for carer well-being and the quality of the caregiving relationship in psychosis deserve further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Onwumere
- 1 Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sophia Howes
- 1 Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Shiers
- 2 Psychosis Research Unit, Prestwich Hospital Manchester, Manchester, UK.,3 The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- 4 Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychosis, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Morrison AP, Law H, Carter L, Sellers R, Emsley R, Pyle M, French P, Shiers D, Yung AR, Murphy EK, Holden N, Steele A, Bowe SE, Palmier-Claus J, Brooks V, Byrne R, Davies L, Haddad PM. Antipsychotic drugs versus cognitive behavioural therapy versus a combination of both in people with psychosis: a randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:411-423. [PMID: 29605187 PMCID: PMC6048761 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30096-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little evidence is available for head-to-head comparisons of psychosocial interventions and pharmacological interventions in psychosis. We aimed to establish whether a randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus antipsychotic drugs versus a combination of both would be feasible in people with psychosis. METHODS We did a single-site, single-blind pilot randomised controlled trial in people with psychosis who used services in National Health Service trusts across Greater Manchester, UK. Eligible participants were aged 16 years or older; met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or delusional disorder, or met the entry criteria for an early intervention for psychosis service; were in contact with mental health services, under the care of a consultant psychiatrist; scored at least 4 on delusions or hallucinations items, or at least 5 on suspiciousness, persecution, or grandiosity items on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS); had capacity to consent; and were help-seeking. Participants were assigned (1:1:1) to antipsychotics, CBT, or antipsychotics plus CBT. Randomisation was done via a secure web-based randomisation system (Sealed Envelope), with randomised permuted blocks of 4 and 6, stratified by gender and first episode status. CBT incorporated up to 26 sessions over 6 months plus up to four booster sessions. Choice and dose of antipsychotic were at the discretion of the treating consultant. Participants were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was feasibility (ie, data about recruitment, retention, and acceptability), and the primary efficacy outcome was the PANSS total score (assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks). Non-neurological side-effects were assessed systemically with the Antipsychotic Non-neurological Side Effects Rating Scale. Primary analyses were done by intention to treat; safety analyses were done on an as-treated basis. The study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN06022197. FINDINGS Of 138 patients referred to the study, 75 were recruited and randomly assigned-26 to CBT, 24 to antipsychotics, and 25 to antipsychotics plus CBT. Attrition was low, and retention high, with only four withdrawals across all groups. 40 (78%) of 51 participants allocated to CBT attended six or more sessions. Of the 49 participants randomised to antipsychotics, 11 (22%) were not prescribed a regular antipsychotic. Median duration of total antipsychotic treatment was 44·5 weeks (IQR 26-51). PANSS total score was significantly reduced in the combined intervention group compared with the CBT group (-5·65 [95% CI -10·37 to -0·93]; p=0·019). PANSS total scores did not differ significantly between the combined group and the antipsychotics group (-4·52 [95% CI -9·30 to 0·26]; p=0·064) or between the antipsychotics and CBT groups (-1·13 [95% CI -5·81 to 3·55]; p=0·637). Significantly fewer side-effects, as measured with the Antipsychotic Non-neurological Side Effects Rating Scale, were noted in the CBT group than in the antipsychotics (3·22 [95% CI 0·58 to 5·87]; p=0·017) or antipsychotics plus CBT (3·99 [95% CI 1·36 to 6·64]; p=0·003) groups. Only one serious adverse event was thought to be related to the trial (an overdose of three paracetamol tablets in the CBT group). INTERPRETATION A head-to-head clinical trial of CBT versus antipsychotics versus the combination of the two is feasible and safe in people with first-episode psychosis. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Morrison
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Heather Law
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lucy Carter
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Sellers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Melissa Pyle
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul French
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Alison R Yung
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Natasha Holden
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ann Steele
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Samantha E Bowe
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jasper Palmier-Claus
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Victoria Brooks
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rory Byrne
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Davies
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter M Haddad
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|