Protease-activated receptor-1 upregulates fibroblast growth factor 7 in stroma of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Protease-activated receptor 1 and 2 contribute to angiotensin II-induced activation of adventitial fibroblasts from rat aorta

Adventitial fibroblasts (AFs) can be activated by angiotensin II (Ang II) and exert pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory effects in vascular remodeling. Protease-activated receptor (PAR) 1 and 2 play a significant role in fibrogenic and inflammatory diseases. The present study hypothesized that PAR1 and PAR2 are involved in Ang II-induced AF activation and contribute to adventitial remodeling. We found that direct activation of PAR1 and PAR2 with PAR1-AP and PAR2-AP led to AF activation, including proliferation and differentiation of AFs, extracellular matrix synthesis, as well as production of pro-fibrotic cytokine TGF-β and pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and MCP-1. Furthermore, PAR1 and PAR2 mediated Ang II-induced AF activation, since both PAR1 and PAR2 antagonists inhibited Ang II-induced proliferation, migration, differentiation, extracellular matrix synthesis and production of pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines in AFs. Finally, mechanistic study showed that Ang II, via Ang II type I receptor (AT1R), upregulated both PAR1 and PAR2 expression, and transactivated PAR1 and PAR2, as denoted by internalization of both proteins. In conclusion, our results suggest that PAR1 and PAR2 play a critical role in Ang II-induced AF activation, and this may contribute to adventitia-related pathological changes.

Inhibition of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway by Qianliening capsules suppresses the growth and induces the apoptosis of human prostate cells

The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway is one of the main growth factor‑mediated signal transduction pathways and is closely associated with the occurrence and development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Qianliening capsules (QC) have significant therapeutic effects on BPH; however, the precise mechanism underlying its anti‑BPH activity remains to be elucidated. To further elucidate the molecular mechanism of the therapeutic effect of QC on BPH, the present study used epidermal growth factor (EGF), which has a role in the pathogenesis of BPH, to stimulate the growth of human prostate WPMY‑1 cells and activate the STAT3 pathway in the WPMY‑1 cells. The cell viability was determined using an MTT assay and the cell morphology was observed by phase‑contrast microscopy. Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis with Annexin‑V/propidium iodide (PI) staining and PI staining were performed to examine cell apoptosis and the cell cycle. The activation of caspase‑9 and ‑3 were evaluated by colorimetric assay. STAT3 phosphorylation and transcriptional activity were detected by western blot analysis and the luciferase gene reporter, respectively. The mRNA and protein expression levels of B‑cell lymhoma 2 (Bcl‑2), Bcl‑2‑associated X protein (Bax), cyclin D1, cyclin‑dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and p21 were measured by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis, respectively. In the present study, QC was found to significantly and dose‑dependently inhibit the EGF‑stimulated growth of WPMY‑1 cells, as evidenced by QC‑induced cell -morphological changes and a reduction in cell viability. In addition, QC treatment markedly induced the activation of caspase‑9 and ‑3. QC treatment also inhibited the EGF‑mediated increase of STAT3 phosphorylation levels and transcriptional activity in WPMY‑19 cells, accompanied by downregulation of the expression of Bcl‑2, cyclin D1 and CDK4 and upregulation of the expression of Bax and p21. These results suggested that QC effectively inhibited the proliferation and promoted the apoptosis of human prostate cells via modulation of the STAT3 signaling pathway and its target genes, which is likely to be one of the mechanisms underlying its activity in BPH treatment.

Expression of proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) is androgen-dependent in stromal cell line (hPCPs) from benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Growth properties of the prostate are regulated by a variety of hormones and growth factors. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is characterized by abnormal epithelial and stromal proliferation. Varying androgen hormone levels in elderly men are correlated with abnormal proliferations of the prostate. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2), a subtype of G-protein-coupled receptors, is known to induce multiple biological processes. It could also play a key role in the proliferation and metastasis of prostate cancer, but its effect on BPH pathogenesis is to a great extent unknown.

METHODS

Localization of PAR2 was determined both in pathologically altered and in normal prostate tissues by using immunohistochemical techniques. PAR2 activity was assessed by measuring changes in intracellular calcium [Ca(2+)](i) following stimulation of cultured stromal cells with a PAR2 agonist (trypsin) and a synthetic PAR2-activating peptide (AP). DHT-dependence of PAR2 expression in prostate cancer and prostatic stromal cell lines was examined with semi-quantitative and quantitative PCR. Cultured stromal cells (hPCPs) were stimulated with PAR2 AP and cell proliferation was determined through [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation.

RESULTS

In comparison to normal prostate, PAR2 expression was increased in BPH stroma. DHT induced a higher expression of PAR2 when sub-physiological DHT-levels were used. Higher levels of DHT produced reduced PAR2 expression. A mitogenic effect was induced by applying PAR2 AP to hPCPs-cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we found that PAR2 expression is hormone-dependent in prostatic stromal cells with a negative correlation and we consider it to be an important factor in mitogenesis in BPH.

Kallikrein-related peptidase-4 initiates tumor-stroma interactions in prostate cancer through protease-activated receptor-1

In prostate cancer, the mechanism by which the stromal cells surrounding the cancer epithelium become reactive and overproduce growth factors is unclear. Furthermore, the precise process of how these stromal cells stimulate the cancer epithelium is not fully understood. We recently found that protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) in these reactive stromal cells is upregulated. To investigate the role of PAR-1 in the stromal-epithelial interaction, WPMY-1 stromal myofibroblasts were stimulated with PAR-1 agonists including thrombin and PAR-1 activating peptide. We show that WPMY-1 cells have functional PAR-1 by signaling through ERK1/2. Conditioned media (CM) from PAR-1 agonists-treated WPMY-1 cells stimulate the epithelial LNCaP cells leading to ERK1/2 activation and cell proliferation. Cytokine array analysis of the CM demonstrates that PAR-1 induces stromal cells to release numerous cytokines, of which interleukin 6 (IL-6) is the major factor responsible for mitogenic signaling in LNCaP cells. CM further induces expression of prostate-specific kallikrein-related peptidase-3 (KLK3/PSA) and KLK4 in LNCaP cells via the IL-6 pathway. Moreover, KLK4 functions as a potent agonist of PAR-1 by cleaving the receptor at the proper site on cell surface. KLK4 triggers transmembrane signaling and upregulates IL-6 in WPMY-1 cells through PAR-1. Immunohistochemical analysis indicates that PAR-1 is predominantly expressed in peritumoral stroma while KLK4 is produced exclusively by the epithelial cancer cells. These data provide evidence for a novel double-paracrine mechanism whereby cancer epithelium produces KLK4 to activate PAR-1 in the surrounding stroma, which in-turn releases cytokines (IL-6) that stimulate cancer cells to proliferate and increase production of KLKs.

Prostasin regulates iNOS and cyclin D1 expression by modulating protease-activated receptor-2 signaling in prostate epithelial cells

BACKGROUND

Prostasin is down-regulated during inflammation and in invasive cancers, and plays a role in regulation of inflammatory gene expression and invasion.

METHODS

We used the human benign prostatic hyperplasia cell line BPH-1 to investigate gene expression changes associated with siRNA-mediated loss of prostasin expression. Quantitative PCR and/or western blotting were used to evaluate the expression changes of iNOS, ICAM-1, cyclin D1, IL-6, and IL-8. Gene expression changes were also evaluated in the presence of a PAR-2 antagonist. The PC-3 human prostate cancer cell line was used for evaluation of gene expression in response to prostasin re-expression.

RESULTS

Prostasin silencing in BPH-1 was associated with up-regulation of iNOS, ICAM-1, IL-6, and IL-8, and down-regulation of cyclin D1; as well as reduced proliferation and invasion. The iNOS up-regulation and cyclin D1 down-regulation associated with prostasin silencing were inhibited by a PAR-2 antagonist. Re-expression of prostasin, a serine active-site mutant, and a GPI-anchor-free mutant, in the PC-3 cells resulted in PAR-2 and cyclin D1 transcription up-regulation. Transcription up-regulation of IL-6 and IL-8 was associated with re-expression of the serine active-site mutant prostasin in the PC-3 cells. Transcription up-regulation of IL-8, but to a lesser extent, was also observed in PC-3 cells expressing the wild-type prostasin. Expression of a serine protease active prostasin, GPI-anchored or anchor-free, prevented the IL-6 induction in response to PAR-2. The GPI-anchor-free prostasin also prevented the IL-8 induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostasin plays a negative regulatory role on PAR-2-mediated signaling in prostate epithelial cells.

Protease-activated receptor-1 is upregulated in reactive stroma of primary prostate cancer and bone metastasis

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer progression is partly facilitated by tumor-stroma interactions. We recently reported that protease-activated receptors (PAR-1 and PAR-2) are overexpressed in prostate cancer, and PAR-1 expression in peritumoral stroma is associated with biochemical recurrence. However, the nature of PAR expression in prostate tumor microenvironment is not fully understood. We therefore evaluated PAR-1 and PAR-2 expression in primary prostate cancer and bone metastasis.

METHODS

PAR-1 and PAR-2 expression in normal, primary prostate cancer and the corresponding bone metastatic tissues were examined by immunohistochemistry, and double-label immunohistochemistry with the use of additional markers.

RESULTS

PAR-1 was expressed in peritumoral stroma in the majority of primary cancer tissues (83%). Serial sections and double-label immunohistochemistry determined that these PAR-1 expressing stromal cells were predominantly myofibroblasts, the primary cell type in reactive stroma. Analysis of cancer glands revealed that PAR-1 expression was significantly increased in the reactive stroma around higher Gleason grade cancers. PAR-2 was predominantly expressed in the primary cancer cells as well as smooth muscle cells but not in reactive stroma. In bone metastasis, PAR-1 expression in cancer cells was elevated compared to the primary site from the same patient. In the bone reactive stroma, PAR-1 was present in vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts, while both PAR-1 and PAR-2 were expressed in osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary prostate cancer and bone metastasis, PAR-1 is upregulated in reactive stroma and PAR-2 is uniformly overexpressed in carcinoma cells, suggesting these receptors may play potentially different roles in prostate cancer development and metastasis.