Estramustine potentiates the effects of irradiation on the Dunning (R3327) rat prostatic adenocarcinoma

Antiandrogens in prostate cancer

Antiandrogens competitively inhibit ligand binding to the androgen receptor (AR), and are used therapeutically in prostate cancer patients. The AR functions as a ligand dependent transcription factor that transduces androgen binding into increased transcription of androgen dependent genes. AR blockade induces programmed cell death in the vast majority of malignant and benign prostate cancer cells that have not previously been exposed to androgen ablation. The antiandrogens are divided structurally into the steroidal and non steroidal agents. The biological effects of the steroidal versus nonsteroidal agents are distinguished by differences in their effects on serum testosterone levels, and by their activity at receptors other than the androgen receptor. There is extensive clinical experience in the palliative and curative therapy of prostate cancer using antiandrogens as monotherapy or antiandrogens in combination with luteinizing hormone agonists or surgical castration. Prolonged therapy with antiandrogens selects for mutations in the AR that change the AR ligand specificity and permits stimulation by ligands that are usually inhibitory. These mutations give insight into one of the means by which prostate cancer progresses despite antiandrogen therapy, and also helps to explain the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. Areas of active research that may affect the future use of antiandrogens include the ongoing evaluation of antiandrogens in combination with 5 alpha reductase inhibitors to achieve AR blockade without inducing castrate testosterone levels. There is also interest in developing selective androgen receptor modulators (SARM) that can achieve AR blockade without causing the increased testosterone levels produced by the nonsteroidal antiandrogens currently in use.

Estramustine resistance

Estramustine (EM), a conjugate of nornitrogen mustard and estradiol, is a antimicrotubule drug currently in use for the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Experimental data are accumulating concerning the antitumor effect of EM in other malignancies, and clinical studies in other malignancies are ongoing. This review summarizes the information available to date concerning the effects of EM and the development of drug resistance. EM depolymerizes microtubules by binding to microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) as well as tubulin. Because of the radiosensitizing effect of this drug there has been a recent increase in interest concerning estramustine and its clinical use. Recently, it was proposed that EM induces an apoptotic cell death in glioma cells in vitro and in a rat model. EM resistance is distinct from MDR phenotype; it has been used in combination with antimitotic agents which are part of the MDR phenotype. Observations made with estramustine-resistant cell lines show the acquisition of estramustine resistance is a function of multiple adaptation by changes at tubulin expression pattern, and is also associated with changes in tau expression and phosphorylation.

Current status of androgen suppression and radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer

Analogous to the impact of anti-estrogen therapy in breast cancer, anti-androgen therapy may have a greater impact on the castrate male with non-metastatic disease. The use of castration or a LHRH drug alone, does not appear to adequately suppress intra-prostatic DHT (Dihydrotestosterone) levels. Normal prostate elements appear to be more efficient than metastatic elements at converting DHT precursors to active DHT. Thus, blocking this step may be more critical for clinically localized disease. Laverdiere et al. reported a 2 year positive (+) biopsy rate of 65% with XRT alone compared to 28% when 3 months of NHT preceded radiotherapy, but 5% if NHT was continued for a total of 10.5 months of combined androgen blockade (CAB). Bolla et al. incorporated one month of NHT prior to XRT followed by 3 years of an LHRH drug. An improvement in local control, disease free survival and overall survival of nearly 20% was noted at 5 years. Thus far, these important studies demonstrate that a survival benefit may require long term adjuvant hormonal therapy. There is a need for further studies to define the optimal timing and duration of CAB and the role of XRT. Long term data recently provided by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) may provide insights into criteria for defining which patients are likely to benefit the most from long term CAB.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in carcinoma of the prostate

The rising incidence of and mortality from prostate cancer has generated great interest in improving the results of current methods of treatment. It is well-established that large tumour volumes and positive surgical margins are correlated with higher rates of local failure and distant metastasis. Significant decreases in both tumour volume and the rates of positive surgical margins are seen with NHT. Follow-up data from one randomized trial of hormonal therapy before RT have shown significantly improved disease-free survival, but so far there has been no benefit in overall survival. However, the addition of adjuvant hormonal therapy has been reported to improve survival. The results suggest that neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal therapy may be a viable option in men with locally advanced prostate cancer in whom cure is probably impossible, but disease progression can potentially be slowed. What remains to be determined is whether hormonal therapy alone can produce the same results. For younger men with clinically localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy is increasingly the treatment of choice. Prospective randomized trials of NHT have produced impressive statistics for decreasing the incidence of positive surgical margins, but the potential to down-stage tumours remains controversial. Follow-up serum PSA measurements have thus far shown no benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The possibility that patients who fail biochemically, whether they are from the pretreated or control group, may simply represent a subgroup with aggressive tumours that may not respond to androgen withdrawal, has yet to be proved. As more follow-up data are analysed within the next several years, there must be a clear survival advantage if NHT is to be offered as a treatment option. Despite the potential of neoadjuvant therapy, the use of androgen withdrawal before definitive surgical treatment should be limited to clinical trials until a clearer picture emerges. Some may argue that although there is no evidence of a true advantage for NHT, neither is there evidence of harm. However, it must be recognized that androgen withdrawal therapy has side-effects and adds significantly to the overall cost of treatment. Furthermore, NHT delays definitive treatment; clearly, this can be a source of anxiety for the patient and the impact on survival is unknown. Currently, the rates of pathologically organ-confined disease are high in some subsets of patients (e.g. low-stage, low-grade and low PSA) so that NHT is unlikely to have great additional benefit. Although the influence of hormones on prostate growth has been known for many decades, we are only now elucidating the biological mechanisms of hormonal therapy. Although androgen ablation therapy has been used in men with metastatic prostate cancer for more than 50 years, further research at the cellular and molecular level is essential if we are to refine treatment modalities for both localized and advanced disease. Furthermore, until we have more follow-up data from randomized clinical trials of NHT, it cannot be considered part of the standard treatment for carcinoma of the prostate. There are still too many unknown factors; only time will tell if the initial promise of NHT will be fulfilled.

Combined castration and fractionated radiotherapy in an experimental prostatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The present study using the Dunning R3327-PAP rat prostatic adenocarcinoma model was designed to study the effect on tumor growth of castration prior to or after irradiation with 20-25 Gy as compared with either irradiation or castration alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Rats were bilaterally orchidectomized. During the irradiation procedure the nonanesthetized animals were held in a metallic frame with a strong cotton net and they were observed by means of a video camera. The suboptimal irradiation dose was given once daily with a 4-MeV linear accelerator, 4-5 Gy/fraction, during 5 consecutive days. Tumor volumes and rat weights were followed. At the end point of the study the animals were sacrificed and the tumors were morphometrically analyzed.

RESULTS

The combination of irradiation and castration delayed tumor regrowth better than irradiation alone with the same suboptimal dose. Castration before irradiation delayed tumor regrowth more efficiently than castration after irradiation. However, castration alone delayed tumor regrowth even more effectively than suboptimal irradiation doses combined with castration.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with suboptimal irradiation neoadjuvant androgen deprivation was more inhibitory to rat prostatic adenocarcinoma regrowth than adjuvant androgen deprivation. Irradiation with suboptimal doses combined with castration may cause an earlier relapse to androgen-independent tumor growth than castration alone.

Tumor blood flow and the cytotoxic effects of estramustine and its constituents in a rat glioma model

OBJECTIVE

Estramustine (EaM) is a conjugate of nor-nitrogen mustard (NNM) and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) that has cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects on experimental malignant glioma. Its mechanism of action is only partly understood. To further investigate the mechanism in vivo, the effects on tumor blood flow (TBF) and tumor growth were analyzed.

METHODS

TBF was measured by radioactive microspheres, and tumor growth was measured by weight. Apoptosis was evaluated by in situ end labeling and gel electrophoresis. The effects of the constituents NNM and E2 were also evaluated.

RESULTS

EaM increased TBF to 153.8 ml/100 g/min after 3 days and to 153.9 ml/100 g/min after 10 days of treatment, compared with 94.0 ml/100 g/min in untreated controls. Cerebral blood flow did not change after EaM treatment. NNM increased TBF but also showed a tendency to increase cerebral blood flow. E2 increased TBF, whereas cerebral blood flow was unchanged. EaM resulted in a rapid reduction in tumor weight from 230 mg in untreated animals to 146 mg after 3 days of treatment. EaM induced an early transient fragmentation of deoxyribonucleic acid in glioma but not in the normal brain. Neither NNM nor E2 affected tumor weight.

CONCLUSION

EaM increases TBF in the BT4C rat glioma model with a concomitant rapid antitumoral effect. The increase in TBF could partially be induced by an estrogen-like action of EaM, but the rapid cytotoxic effect of the drug is obviously attributed to the intact EaM compound. This cytotoxic effect might be attributable to the induction of programmed cell death.

Radioiodinated estramustine phosphate and estramustine binding protein antibody accumulate in the prostate of a mouse

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of radioiodinated estramustine (RI-EMP) and a radioiodinated antibody against estramustine binding protein (RI-EMBP-AB) in mice.

METHODS

RI-EMP and RI-EMBP-AB were injected in male mice intravenously, and the activities of tissue samples were measured 1-31 hr from the injection. Pure iodine-125 (RI) was used as a control.

RESULTS

RI-EMP accumulated in the prostate, which contained 2.6% of injected activity (ID) per gram tissue at 7 hr. The liver had an activity of 21.4% ID/g at 1 hr, which decreased as RI-EMP was secreted in bile. The lung contained 2.3% ID/g at 7 hr, and it retained the activity longer than the prostate. RI-EMBP-AB accumulated in the prostate: The activity was 2.9% ID/g at 7 hr. The gallbladder contained 6.5% ID/g at 7 hr.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its cytotoxic and radiosensitizing properties, RI-EMP can possibly be used for treating prostate cancer and other tumors.

Estramustine in malignant glioma

Estramustine, a carbamate ester combining 17 beta-estradiol and nornitrogen mustard, has primarily been employed in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. However, a significant amount of preclinical investigation has been directed toward estramustine's activity against human malignant glioma. These studies have demonstrated that estramustine has potent antiproliferative effects against malignant glioma both in vitro and in vivo. Similar antimitotic effects also have been demonstrated for other carbamate esters. Estramustine does not impair proliferation of nonneoplastic astrocytes at concentrations that inhibit glioma cells. Although the reasons for this selective activity remain to be determined, it has been shown that malignant gliomas expresses an estramustine-specific binding site, estramustine-binding protein, more than brain tissue. In the clinical situation, an uptake and accumulation of estramustine in human glioma tissue have been demonstrated. Estramustine has been shown to enhance the cytotoxic effects of irradiation in relatively radioresistant glioma cells both in cell culture and in a rat glioma model. Estramustine has been regarded as mainly an anti-mitotic drug but recently other effects such as inhibition of DNA synthesis, induction of apoptosis, and membrane alterations have been shown. This report summarizes the preclinical observations concerning the effects of estramustine and related compounds on human malignant gliomas. These findings form the basis for proposing further laboratory and clinical investigation regarding estramustine and human malignant gliomas.

Radiosensitizing effect of estramustine in malignant glioma in vitro and in vivo

Estramustine-phosphate (EMP), a combination of nornitrogen mustard and 17 beta-estradiol, has been demonstrated to exert specific antiproliferative effects on human glioma cells in vitro. The cytotoxic effect is, at least partially, mediated by inhibiting microtubule function. In this study the combined effect of EMP and radiation was evaluated in the human glioma cell-lines, 251-MG and 105-MG, in vitro, and in the rat glioma BT4C in vitro and in vivo. In all cell-lines an additive effect of EMP and radiation was obtained in vitro. Assuming equal effect of EMP is obtained in subsequent radiation fractions, the cell kill will be increased from 2-3 to 5-10 logs if delivering 30 fractions of 2 Gy combined with EMP. In the BT4C rat model the combined effect was found to be synergistic. Flow cytometry demonstrated an arrest in G2/M phase in all cell-lines after EMP treatment. This block in G2/M phase in addition to the previously demonstrated induction of free oxygen radicals, and the increase of blood flow with an assumed subsequent increase of oxygenation, might provide an explanation for the observed radiosensitizing effect of estramustine.