1
|
Liu JX, Zhang X, Huang YQ, Hao GF, Yang GF. Multi-level bioinformatics resources support drug target discovery of protein-protein interactions. Drug Discov Today 2024; 29:103979. [PMID: 38608830 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Drug discovery often begins with a new target. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are crucial to multitudinous cellular processes and offer a promising avenue for drug-target discovery. PPIs are characterized by multi-level complexity: at the protein level, interaction networks can be used to identify potential targets, whereas at the residue level, the details of the interactions of individual PPIs can be used to examine a target's druggability. Much great progress has been made in target discovery through multi-level PPI-related computational approaches, but these resources have not been fully discussed. Here, we systematically survey bioinformatics tools for identifying and assessing potential drug targets, examining their characteristics, limitations and applications. This work will aid the integration of the broader protein-to-network context with the analysis of detailed binding mechanisms to support the discovery of drug targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Xin Liu
- National Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Pesticide & Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, International Joint Research Center for Intelligent Biosensor Technology and Health, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for R&D of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Yuan-Qin Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for R&D of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Ge-Fei Hao
- National Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Pesticide & Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, International Joint Research Center for Intelligent Biosensor Technology and Health, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for R&D of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China.
| | - Guang-Fu Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Pesticide & Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, International Joint Research Center for Intelligent Biosensor Technology and Health, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tran MH, Schoeder CT, Schey KL, Meiler J. Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook. Front Immunol 2022; 13:859964. [PMID: 35720345 PMCID: PMC9204306 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although computational structure prediction has had great successes in recent years, it regularly fails to predict the interactions of large protein complexes with residue-level accuracy, or even the correct orientation of the protein partners. The performance of computational docking can be notably enhanced by incorporating experimental data from structural biology techniques. A rapid method to probe protein-protein interactions is hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). HDX-MS has been increasingly used for epitope-mapping of antibodies (Abs) to their respective antigens (Ags) in the past few years. In this paper, we review the current state of HDX-MS in studying protein interactions, specifically Ab-Ag interactions, and how it has been used to inform computational structure prediction calculations. Particularly, we address the limitations of HDX-MS in epitope mapping and techniques and protocols applied to overcome these barriers. Furthermore, we explore computational methods that leverage HDX-MS to aid structure prediction, including the computational simulation of HDX-MS data and the combination of HDX-MS and protein docking. We point out challenges in interpreting and incorporating HDX-MS data into Ab-Ag complex docking and highlight the opportunities they provide to build towards a more optimized hybrid method, allowing for more reliable, high throughput epitope identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minh H. Tran
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Center of Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Clara T. Schoeder
- Center of Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Institute for Drug Discovery, University Leipzig Medical School, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kevin L. Schey
- Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center of Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Institute for Drug Discovery, University Leipzig Medical School, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mapping protein interactions in the active TOM-TIM23 supercomplex. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5715. [PMID: 34588454 PMCID: PMC8481542 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26016-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins destined for the matrix have to be transported across two membranes. The TOM and TIM23 complexes facilitate the transport of precursor proteins with N-terminal targeting signals into the matrix. During transport, precursors are recognized by the TIM23 complex in the inner membrane for handover from the TOM complex. However, we have little knowledge on the organization of the TOM-TIM23 transition zone and on how precursor transfer between the translocases occurs. Here, we have designed a precursor protein that is stalled during matrix transport in a TOM-TIM23-spanning manner and enables purification of the translocation intermediate. Combining chemical cross-linking with mass spectrometric analyses and structural modeling allows us to map the molecular environment of the intermembrane space interface of TOM and TIM23 as well as the import motor interactions with amino acid resolution. Our analyses provide a framework for understanding presequence handover and translocation during matrix protein transport. The TOM and TIM23 complexes facilitate the transport of nuclear-encoded proteins into the mitochondrial matrix. Here, the authors use a stalled client protein to purify the translocation supercomplex and gain insight into the TOM-TIM23 interface and the mechanism of protein handover from the TOM to the TIM23 complex.
Collapse
|
4
|
Campeanu IJ, Jiang Y, Liu L, Pilecki M, Najor A, Cobani E, Manning M, Zhang XM, Yang ZQ. Multi-omics integration of methyltransferase-like protein family reveals clinical outcomes and functional signatures in human cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:14784. [PMID: 34285249 PMCID: PMC8292347 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94019-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Human methyltransferase-like (METTL) proteins transfer methyl groups to nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and other small molecules, subsequently playing important roles in various cellular processes. In this study, we performed integrated genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and clinicopathological analyses of 34 METTLs in a large cohort of primary tumor and cell line data. We identified a subset of METTL genes, notably METTL1, METTL7B, and NTMT1, with high frequencies of genomic amplification and/or up-regulation at both the mRNA and protein levels in a spectrum of human cancers. Higher METTL1 expression was associated with high-grade tumors and poor disease prognosis. Loss-of-function analysis in tumor cell lines indicated the biological importance of METTL1, an m7G methyltransferase, in cancer cell growth and survival. Furthermore, functional annotation and pathway analysis of METTL1-associated proteins revealed that, in addition to the METTL1 cofactor WDR4, RNA regulators and DNA packaging complexes may be functionally interconnected with METTL1 in human cancer. Finally, we generated a crystal structure model of the METTL1–WDR4 heterodimeric complex that might aid in understanding the key functional residues. Our results provide new information for further functional study of some METTL alterations in human cancer and might lead to the development of small inhibitors that target cancer-promoting METTLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ion John Campeanu
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Yuanyuan Jiang
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lanxin Liu
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Maksymilian Pilecki
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alvina Najor
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Era Cobani
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Morenci Manning
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Xiaohong Mary Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.,Molecular Therapeutics Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R Street, HWCRC 815, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Zeng-Quan Yang
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. .,Molecular Therapeutics Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R Street, HWCRC 815, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marakasova E, Olivares P, Karnaukhova E, Chun H, Hernandez NE, Kurasawa JH, Hassink GU, Shestopal SA, Strickland DK, Sarafanov AG. Molecular chaperone RAP interacts with LRP1 in a dynamic bivalent mode and enhances folding of ligand-binding regions of other LDLR family receptors. J Biol Chem 2021; 297:100842. [PMID: 34058195 PMCID: PMC8239462 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family of receptors are cell-surface receptors that internalize numerous ligands and play crucial role in various processes, such as lipoprotein metabolism, hemostasis, fetal development, etc. Previously, receptor-associated protein (RAP) was described as a molecular chaperone for LDLR-related protein 1 (LRP1), a prominent member of the LDLR family. We aimed to verify this role of RAP for LRP1 and two other LDLR family receptors, LDLR and vLDLR, and to investigate the mechanisms of respective interactions using a cell culture model system, purified system, and in silico modelling. Upon coexpression of RAP with clusters of the ligand-binding complement repeats (CRs) of the receptors in secreted form in insect cells culture, the isolated proteins had increased yield, enhanced folding, and improved binding properties compared with proteins expressed without RAP, as determined by circular dichroism and surface plasmon resonance. Within LRP1 CR-clusters II and IV, we identified multiple sites comprised of adjacent CR doublets, which provide alternative bivalent binding combinations with specific pairs of lysines on RAP. Mutational analysis of these lysines within each of isolated RAP D1/D2 and D3 domains having high affinity to LRP1 and of conserved tryptophans on selected CR-doublets of LRP1, as well as in silico docking of a model LRP1 CR-triplet with RAP, indicated a universal role for these residues in interaction of RAP and LRP1. Consequently, we propose a new model of RAP interaction with LDLR family receptors based on switching of the bivalent contacts between molecules over time in a dynamic mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Marakasova
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Philip Olivares
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Elena Karnaukhova
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Haarin Chun
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Nancy E Hernandez
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - James H Kurasawa
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Gabriela U Hassink
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Svetlana A Shestopal
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Dudley K Strickland
- Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrey G Sarafanov
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schoeder CT, Schmitz S, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Sevy AM, Finn JA, Sauer MF, Bozhanova NG, Mueller BK, Sangha AK, Bonet J, Sheehan JH, Kuenze G, Marlow B, Smith ST, Woods H, Bender BJ, Martina CE, Del Alamo D, Kodali P, Gulsevin A, Schief WR, Correia BE, Crowe JE, Meiler J, Moretti R. Modeling Immunity with Rosetta: Methods for Antibody and Antigen Design. Biochemistry 2021; 60:825-846. [PMID: 33705117 PMCID: PMC7992133 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
![]()
Structure-based antibody
and antigen design has advanced greatly
in recent years, due not only to the increasing availability of experimentally
determined structures but also to improved computational methods for
both prediction and design. Constant improvements in performance within
the Rosetta software suite for biomolecular modeling have given rise
to a greater breadth of structure prediction, including docking and
design application cases for antibody and antigen modeling. Here,
we present an overview of current protocols for antibody and antigen
modeling using Rosetta and exemplify those by detailed tutorials originally
developed for a Rosetta workshop at Vanderbilt University. These tutorials
cover antibody structure prediction, docking, and design and antigen
design strategies, including the addition of glycans in Rosetta. We
expect that these materials will allow novice users to apply Rosetta
in their own projects for modeling antibodies and antigens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara T Schoeder
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Samuel Schmitz
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.,IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Alexander M Sevy
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0301, United States.,Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0417, United States
| | - Jessica A Finn
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0417, United States.,Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | - Marion F Sauer
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0301, United States.,Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0417, United States
| | - Nina G Bozhanova
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Benjamin K Mueller
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Amandeep K Sangha
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Jaume Bonet
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan H Sheehan
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Georg Kuenze
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Institute for Drug Discovery, University Leipzig Medical School, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Brennica Marlow
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0301, United States
| | - Shannon T Smith
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0301, United States
| | - Hope Woods
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0301, United States
| | - Brian J Bender
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States
| | - Cristina E Martina
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Diego Del Alamo
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0301, United States
| | - Pranav Kodali
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - Alican Gulsevin
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| | - William R Schief
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.,IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Bruno E Correia
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - James E Crowe
- Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0417, United States.,Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States.,Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | - Jens Meiler
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States.,Institute for Drug Discovery, University Leipzig Medical School, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Rocco Moretti
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.,Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-7917, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burman SSR, Nance ML, Jeliazkov JR, Labonte JW, Lubin JH, Biswas N, Gray JJ. Novel sampling strategies and a coarse-grained score function for docking homomers, flexible heteromers, and oligosaccharides using Rosetta in CAPRI rounds 37-45. Proteins 2020; 88:973-985. [PMID: 31742764 PMCID: PMC8589291 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI) rounds 37 through 45 introduced larger complexes, new macromolecules, and multistage assemblies. For these rounds, we used and expanded docking methods in Rosetta to model 23 target complexes. We successfully predicted 14 target complexes and recognized and refined near-native models generated by other groups for two further targets. Notably, for targets T110 and T136, we achieved the closest prediction of any CAPRI participant. We created several innovative approaches during these rounds. Since round 39 (target 122), we have used the new RosettaDock 4.0, which has a revamped coarse-grained energy function and the ability to perform conformer selection during docking with hundreds of pregenerated protein backbones. Ten of the complexes had some degree of symmetry in their interactions, so we tested Rosetta SymDock, realized its shortcomings, and developed the next-generation symmetric docking protocol, SymDock2, which includes docking of multiple backbones and induced-fit refinement. Since the last CAPRI assessment, we also developed methods for modeling and designing carbohydrates in Rosetta, and we used them to successfully model oligosaccharide-protein complexes in round 41. Although the results were broadly encouraging, they also highlighted the pressing need to invest in (a) flexible docking algorithms with the ability to model loop and linker motions and in (b) new sampling and scoring methods for oligosaccharide-protein interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shourya S. Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Morgan L. Nance
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Jason W. Labonte
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph H. Lubin
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Naireeta Biswas
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey J. Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perthold JW, Oostenbrink C. GroScore: Accurate Scoring of Protein–Protein Binding Poses Using Explicit-Solvent Free-Energy Calculations. J Chem Inf Model 2019; 59:5074-5085. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Walther Perthold
- Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria
| | - Chris Oostenbrink
- Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marze NA, Roy Burman SS, Sheffler W, Gray JJ. Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets. Bioinformatics 2019; 34:3461-3469. [PMID: 29718115 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Motivation Binding-induced conformational changes challenge current computational docking algorithms by exponentially increasing the conformational space to be explored. To restrict this search to relevant space, some computational docking algorithms exploit the inherent flexibility of the protein monomers to simulate conformational selection from pre-generated ensembles. As the ensemble size expands with increased flexibility, these methods struggle with efficiency and high false positive rates. Results Here, we develop and benchmark RosettaDock 4.0, which efficiently samples large conformational ensembles of flexible proteins and docks them using a novel, six-dimensional, coarse-grained score function. A strong discriminative ability allows an eight-fold higher enrichment of near-native candidate structures in the coarse-grained phase compared to RosettaDock 3.2. It adaptively samples 100 conformations each of the ligand and the receptor backbone while increasing computational time by only 20-80%. In local docking of a benchmark set of 88 proteins of varying degrees of flexibility, the expected success rate (defined as cases with ≥50% chance of achieving 3 near-native structures in the 5 top-ranked ones) for blind predictions after resampling is 77% for rigid complexes, 49% for moderately flexible complexes and 31% for highly flexible complexes. These success rates on flexible complexes are a substantial step forward from all existing methods. Additionally, for highly flexible proteins, we demonstrate that when a suitable conformer generation method exists, the method successfully docks the complex. Availability and implementation As a part of the Rosetta software suite, RosettaDock 4.0 is available at https://www.rosettacommons.org to all non-commercial users for free and to commercial users for a fee. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Marze
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shourya S Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William Sheffler
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Seffernick J, Harvey SR, Wysocki VH, Lindert S. Predicting Protein Complex Structure from Surface-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Data. ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE 2019; 5:1330-1341. [PMID: 31482115 PMCID: PMC6716128 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Recently, mass spectrometry (MS) has become a viable method for elucidation of protein structure. Surface-induced dissociation (SID), colliding multiply charged protein complexes or other ions with a surface, has been paired with native MS to provide useful structural information such as connectivity and topology for many different protein complexes. We recently showed that SID gives information not only on connectivity and topology but also on relative interface strengths. However, SID has not yet been coupled with computational structure prediction methods that could use the sparse information from SID to improve the prediction of quaternary structures, i.e., how protein subunits interact with each other to form complexes. Protein-protein docking, a computational method to predict the quaternary structure of protein complexes, can be used in combination with subunit structures from X-ray crystallography and NMR in situations where it is difficult to obtain an experimental structure of an entire complex. While de novo structure prediction can be successful, many studies have shown that inclusion of experimental data can greatly increase prediction accuracy. In this study, we show that the appearance energy (AE, defined as 10% fragmentation) extracted from SID can be used in combination with Rosetta to successfully evaluate protein-protein docking poses. We developed an improved model to predict measured SID AEs and incorporated this model into a scoring function that combines the RosettaDock scoring function with a novel SID scoring term, which quantifies agreement between experiments and structures generated from RosettaDock. As a proof of principle, we tested the effectiveness of these restraints on 57 systems using ideal SID AE data (AE determined from crystal structures using the predictive model). When theoretical AEs were used, the RMSD of the selected structure improved or stayed the same in 95% of cases. When experimental SID data were incorporated on a different set of systems, the method predicted near-native structures (less than 2 Å root-mean-square deviation, RMSD, from native) for 6/9 tested cases, while unrestrained RosettaDock (without SID data) only predicted 3/9 such cases. Score versus RMSD funnel profiles were also improved when SID data were included. Additionally, we developed a confidence measure to evaluate predicted model quality in the absence of a crystal structure.
Collapse
|
11
|
Roy Burman SS, Yovanno RA, Gray JJ. Flexible Backbone Assembly and Refinement of Symmetrical Homomeric Complexes. Structure 2019; 27:1041-1051.e8. [PMID: 31006588 PMCID: PMC6719319 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2019.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Symmetrical homomeric proteins are ubiquitous in every domain of life, and information about their structure is essential to decipher function. The size of these complexes often makes them intractable to high-resolution structure determination experiments. Computational docking algorithms offer a promising alternative for modeling large complexes with arbitrary symmetry. Accuracy of existing algorithms, however, is limited by backbone inaccuracies when using homology-modeled monomers. Here, we present Rosetta SymDock2 with a broad search of symmetrical conformational space using a six-dimensional coarse-grained score function followed by an all-atom flexible-backbone refinement, which we demonstrate to be essential for physically realistic modeling of tightly packed complexes. In global docking of a benchmark set of complexes of different point symmetries-starting from homology-modeled monomers-we successfully dock (defined as predicting three near-native structures in the five top-scoring models) 17 out of 31 cyclic complexes and 3 out of 12 dihedral complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shourya S Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Remy A Yovanno
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Adolf-Bryfogle J, Kalyuzhniy O, Kubitz M, Weitzner BD, Hu X, Adachi Y, Schief WR, Dunbrack RL. RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): A general framework for computational antibody design. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006112. [PMID: 29702641 PMCID: PMC5942852 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
A structural-bioinformatics-based computational methodology and framework have been developed for the design of antibodies to targets of interest. RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) samples the diverse sequence, structure, and binding space of an antibody to an antigen in highly customizable protocols for the design of antibodies in a broad range of applications. The program samples antibody sequences and structures by grafting structures from a widely accepted set of the canonical clusters of CDRs (North et al., J. Mol. Biol., 406:228-256, 2011). It then performs sequence design according to amino acid sequence profiles of each cluster, and samples CDR backbones using a flexible-backbone design protocol incorporating cluster-based CDR constraints. Starting from an existing experimental or computationally modeled antigen-antibody structure, RAbD can be used to redesign a single CDR or multiple CDRs with loops of different length, conformation, and sequence. We rigorously benchmarked RAbD on a set of 60 diverse antibody-antigen complexes, using two design strategies-optimizing total Rosetta energy and optimizing interface energy alone. We utilized two novel metrics for measuring success in computational protein design. The design risk ratio (DRR) is equal to the frequency of recovery of native CDR lengths and clusters divided by the frequency of sampling of those features during the Monte Carlo design procedure. Ratios greater than 1.0 indicate that the design process is picking out the native more frequently than expected from their sampled rate. We achieved DRRs for the non-H3 CDRs of between 2.4 and 4.0. The antigen risk ratio (ARR) is the ratio of frequencies of the native amino acid types, CDR lengths, and clusters in the output decoys for simulations performed in the presence and absence of the antigen. For CDRs, we achieved cluster ARRs as high as 2.5 for L1 and 1.5 for H2. For sequence design simulations without CDR grafting, the overall recovery for the native amino acid types for residues that contact the antigen in the native structures was 72% in simulations performed in the presence of the antigen and 48% in simulations performed without the antigen, for an ARR of 1.5. For the non-contacting residues, the ARR was 1.08. This shows that the sequence profiles are able to maintain the amino acid types of these conserved, buried sites, while recovery of the exposed, contacting residues requires the presence of the antigen-antibody interface. We tested RAbD experimentally on both a lambda and kappa antibody-antigen complex, successfully improving their affinities 10 to 50 fold by replacing individual CDRs of the native antibody with new CDR lengths and clusters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
- Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- Program in Molecular and Cell Biology and Genetics, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Oleks Kalyuzhniy
- The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
- IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center at TSRI, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Michael Kubitz
- The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Brian D. Weitzner
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Xiaozhen Hu
- The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Yumiko Adachi
- IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center at TSRI, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - William R. Schief
- The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
- IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center at TSRI, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Roland L. Dunbrack
- Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moretti R, Lyskov S, Das R, Meiler J, Gray JJ. Web-accessible molecular modeling with Rosetta: The Rosetta Online Server that Includes Everyone (ROSIE). Protein Sci 2017; 27:259-268. [PMID: 28960691 DOI: 10.1002/pro.3313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The Rosetta molecular modeling software package provides a large number of experimentally validated tools for modeling and designing proteins, nucleic acids, and other biopolymers, with new protocols being added continually. While freely available to academic users, external usage is limited by the need for expertise in the Unix command line environment. To make Rosetta protocols available to a wider audience, we previously created a web server called Rosetta Online Server that Includes Everyone (ROSIE), which provides a common environment for hosting web-accessible Rosetta protocols. Here we describe a simplification of the ROSIE protocol specification format, one that permits easier implementation of Rosetta protocols. Whereas the previous format required creating multiple separate files in different locations, the new format allows specification of the protocol in a single file. This new, simplified protocol specification has more than doubled the number of Rosetta protocols available under ROSIE. These new applications include pKa determination, lipid accessibility calculation, ribonucleic acid redesign, protein-protein docking, protein-small molecule docking, symmetric docking, antibody docking, cyclic toxin docking, critical binding peptide determination, and mapping small molecule binding sites. ROSIE is freely available to academic users at http://rosie.rosettacommons.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Moretti
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sergey Lyskov
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rhiju Das
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jens Meiler
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Program in Molecular Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|