Simultaneous Modeling of Biomarker and Toxicity Response Predicted Optimal Regimen of Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in Myeloid Malignancies

Decitabine and Vorinostat with Chemotherapy in Relapsed Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A TACL Pilot Study

PURPOSE

Treatment failure from drug resistance is the primary reason for relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Improving outcomes by targeting mechanisms of drug resistance is a potential solution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report results investigating the epigenetic modulators decitabine and vorinostat with vincristine, dexamethasone, mitoxantrone, and PEG-asparaginase for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL (B-ALL). Twenty-three patients, median age 12 years (range, 1-21) were treated in this trial.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3-4 toxicities included hypokalemia (65%), anemia (78%), febrile neutropenia (57%), hypophosphatemia (43%), leukopenia (61%), hyperbilirubinemia (39%), thrombocytopenia (87%), neutropenia (91%), and hypocalcemia (39%). Three subjects experienced dose-limiting toxicities, which included cholestasis, steatosis, and hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1); seizure, somnolence, and delirium (n = 1); and pneumonitis, hypoxia, and hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1). Infectious complications were common with 17 of 23 (74%) subjects experiencing grade ≥3 infections including invasive fungal infections in 35% (8/23). Nine subjects (39%) achieved a complete response (CR + CR without platelet recovery + CR without neutrophil recovery) and five had stable disease (22%). Nine (39%) subjects were not evaluable for response, primarily due to treatment-related toxicities. Correlative pharmacodynamics demonstrated potent in vivo modulation of epigenetic marks, and modulation of biologic pathways associated with functional antileukemic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite encouraging response rates and pharmacodynamics, the combination of decitabine and vorinostat on this intensive chemotherapy backbone was determined not feasible in B-ALL due to the high incidence of significant infectious toxicities. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01483690.

Emerging roles for clinical pharmacometrics in cancer precision medicine

Purpose of review

Although significant progress has been made in cancer research, there exist unmet needs in patient care as reflected by the 'Cancer Moonshot' goals. This review appreciates the potential utility of quantitative pharmacology in cancer precision medicine.

Recent findings

Precision oncology has received federal funding largely due to 'The Precision Medicine Initiative'. Precision medicine takes into account the inter-individual variability, and allows for tailoring the right medication or the right dose of drug to the best subpopulation of patients who will likely respond to the intervention, thus enhancing therapeutic success and reducing "financial toxicity" to patients, families and caregivers. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) committed US$ 70 million from its fiscal year 2016 budget to advance precision oncology research. Through the 'Critical Path Initiative', pharmacometrics has gained an important role in drug development; however, it is yet to find widespread clinical applicability.

Summary

Stakeholders including clinicians and pharmacometricians need to work in concert to ensure that benefits of model-based approaches are harnessed to personalize cancer care to the individual needs of the patient via better dosing strategies, companion diagnostics, and predictive biomarkers. In medical oncology, where immediate patient care is the clinician's primary concern, pharmacometric approaches can be tailored to build models that rely on patient data already digitally available in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to facilitate quick collaboration and avoid additional funding needs. Taken together, we offer a roadmap for the future of precision oncology which is fraught with both challenges and opportunities for pharmacometricians and clinicians alike.