Application of longitudinal item response theory models to modeling Parkinson's disease progression

Supplementing Best Care with Specialized Rehabilitation Treatment in Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Study by Different Expert Centers

Background: This is a retrospective longitudinal study comparing 374 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who were treated in centers offering a specialized program of enhanced rehabilitation therapy in addition to expert outpatient care to 387 patients with PD, who only received expert outpatient care at movement disorders centers in Italy. Methods: The data are from subjects recruited in the Parkinson's Outcome Project (POP) at six Italian centers that are part of a multicenter collaboration for care quality improvement (the Fresco Network). The effects were measured with a baseline and a follow-up clinical evaluation of the Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), and Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI), the number of falls and hospitalizations for any cause. We used a generalized linear mixed model with the dependent variables being the response variable, which included the covariates demographics, evaluation, and treatment variables. Results: We found that the subjects who underwent specialized enhanced rehabilitation had a better motor outcome over time than those who were managed by expert neurologists but had participated in community programs for exercise and other allied health interventions. The greatest effects were seen in patients in the early stages of the disease with a high amount of vigorous exercise per week in the last six months. Similar effects were seen for PDQ39, MCSI, the number of falls, and hospitalization. Conclusions: Long-term benefits to motor function and the quality of life in patients with PD and burden reduction in their caregivers can be achieved through a systematic program of specialized enhanced rehabilitation interventions.

Prediction of Individual Disease Progression Including Parameter Uncertainty in Rare Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Example of Autosomal-Recessive Spastic Ataxia Charlevoix Saguenay (ARSACS)

The aim of this study was to develop a model to predict individual subject disease trajectories including parameter uncertainty and accounting for missing data in rare neurological diseases, showcased by the ultra-rare disease Autosomal-Recessive Spastic Ataxia Charlevoix Saguenay (ARSACS). We modelled the change in SARA (Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia) score versus Time Since Onset of symptoms using non-linear mixed effect models for a population of 173 patients with ARSACS included in the prospective real-world multicenter Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxia (ARCA) registry. We used the Multivariate Imputation Chained Equation (MICE) algorithm to impute missing covariates, and a covariate selection procedure with a pooled p-value to account for the multiply imputed data sets. We then investigated the impact of covariates and population parameter uncertainty on the prediction of the individual trajectories up to 5 years after their last visit. A four-parameter logistic function was selected. Men were estimated to have a 25% lower SARA score at disease onset and a moderately higher maximum SARA score, and time to progression (T50) was estimated to be 35% lower in patients with age of onset over 15 years. The population disease progression rate started slowly at 0.1 points per year peaking to a maximum of 0.8 points per year (at 36.8 years since onset of symptoms). The prediction intervals for SARA scores 5 years after the last visit were large (median 7.4 points, Q1-Q3: 6.4-8.5); their size was mostly driven by individual parameter uncertainty and individual disease progression rate at that time.

Role of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease therapy

Dopamine agonists are an important component of Parkinson's therapy. When weighing up the various therapy options, therapy with levodopa has recently been increasingly preferred due to its stronger efficacy and the ostensibly lower rate of side effects. The advantage of the lower incidence of motor complications during therapy with dopamine agonists was neglected. The occurrence of side effects can be explained by the different receptor affinity to the individual dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic receptors of the individual dopamine agonists. However, the different affinity to individual receptors also explains the different effect on individual Parkinson symptoms and can, therefore, contribute to a targeted use of the different dopamine agonists. Since comparative studies on the differential effect of dopamine agonists have only been conducted for individual substances, empirical knowledge of the differential effect is of great importance. Therefore, the guidelines for the treatment of Parkinson's disease do not consider the differential effect of the dopamine agonists. The historical consideration of dopamine agonists within Parkinson's therapy deserves special attention to be able to classify the current discussion about the significance of dopamine agonists.

Using Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts 2 and 3 Simultaneously: Combining the Patient Voice with Clinician Ratings

BACKGROUND

Regulatory recommendations favor outcomes combining objective and patient input. The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), the most commonly used scale in Parkinson's disease (PD), includes patient and investigator ratings in distinct parts, but original clinimetric analyses failed to confirm the validity of combining parts by simple summing.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to develop clinimetrically valid constructs for combining patient-reported Part 2 and investigator-rated Part 3 MDS-UPDRS scores.

METHODS

Using 7888 MDS-UPDRS scores, we assessed construct validity of combined Part 2 and Part 3 items using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and graded item response theory (IRT) with threshold criteria: comparative fit index ≥0.9 (EFA) and discrimination parameters ≥0.65 (IRT).

RESULTS

The direct sum of Parts 2 + 3 failed to meet the threshold for a valid outcome of PD severity (comparative fit index, CFI = 0.855). However, a two-domain construct combining item scores for tremor and non-tremor domains from Parts 2 and 3 confirmed validity, meeting both EFA and IRT criteria as distinct but correlated indices of disease severity (CFI = 0.923; discrimination mean 2.197 ± 0.480 [tremor] and 1.737 ± 0.344 [non-tremor] domains).

CONCLUSIONS

The sum of Parts 2 + 3 is not clinimetrically sound. However, considering tremor and non-tremor items of both Parts 2 and 3 as two outcomes results in a valid summary of PD motor severity that leverages simultaneous patient- and investigator-derived measures. This analytic application addresses regulatory prioritizations and retains the well-validated MDS-UPDRS items. In future interventional trials, we suggest that tremor and non-tremor components of PD motor severity from Parts 2 + 3 be monitored and analyzed to accurately detect objective changes that integrate the patient's voice. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.